Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T05:38:45.547Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 9 - Laboratory Design, Equipment and Consumables for Oocyte Retrieval

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2022

Rachel Cutting
Affiliation:
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, London
Mostafa Metwally
Affiliation:
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals and the University of Sheffield
Get access

Summary

The importance of optimising the environment in which oocytes are collected should not be underestimated, as the quality of the oocytes obtained is a key determinant factor in the success or failure of any subsequent fertility treatment. The laboratory facilities should be well designed and well equipped, meticulously clean and stocked with carefully selected non-reprotoxic consumables. Laboratory personnel should be well trained, working to clearly defined protocols and competent to perform the procedures relevant to their role. Control of the culture conditions and environmental air quality during the oocyte retrieval is as important as the skill of the doctors, nurses and scientists involved. The modern, well-designed and well-equipped laboratory should provide an optimised, consistent and continually monitored environment for all elements of the IVF process including the collection, processing and incubation of gametes and embryos, without causing unnecessary stress or harm at any point during the procedure.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Nelson, SM, Lawlor, DA. Predicting live birth, preterm delivery, and low birth weight in infants born from in vitro fertilisation: a prospective study of 144,018 treatment cycles. PLoS Med 2011;8(1):e1000386. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000386.Google Scholar
Pickering, SJ, Braude, PR, Johnson, MH, Cant, A, Currie, J. Transient cooling to room temperature can cause irreversible disruption of the meiotic spindle in the human oocyte. Fertil Steril 1990;54(1):102–8. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)53644-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HEFA). Code of Practice, 9th ed. London: HEFA, 2018. Available from: https://portal.hfea.gov.uk/knowledge-base/read-the-code-of-practice/Google Scholar
Cairo Consensus Group. ‘There is only one thing that is truly important in an IVF laboratory: everything.’ Cairo Consensus Guidelines on IVF Culture Conditions. Reprod Biomed Online 2020;40(1):3360. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.10.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Commission. The Rules Governing Medicinal Products in the European Union, Volume 4. EU Guidelines to Good Manufacturing Practice Medicinal Products for Human and Veterinary Use. Annex 1. Manufacture of Sterile Medicinal Products. Brussels: European Commission, 2008. https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/health/files/files/eudralex/vol-4/2008_11_25_gmp-an1_en.pdfGoogle Scholar
ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology and Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine. The Vienna consensus: report of an expert meeting on the development of ART laboratory performance indicators. Reprod Biomed Online 2017;35(5):494510. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.06.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nijs, M, Franssen, K, Cox, A, et al. Reprotoxicity of intrauterine insemination and in vitro fertilization–embryo transfer disposables and products: a 4-year survey. Fertil Steril 2008;92(2):527–35. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.07.011Google ScholarPubMed
Delaroche, L, Oger, P, Genauzeau, E, et al. Embryotoxicity testing of IVF disposables: how do manufacturers test? Hum Reprod 2020;35(2):283–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swain, J. Optimizing the culture environment in the IVF laboratory: impact of pH and buffer capacity on gamete and embryo quality. Reprod Biomed Online 2010;21(1): 616. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.03.012CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×