Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T15:25:06.916Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Prologue: Biocultural Co-Constructivism as a Theoretical Metascript

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 July 2009

Paul B. Baltes
Affiliation:
Professor of Psychology University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA
Frank Rösler
Affiliation:
Professor for Experimental and Biological Psychology Philipps-University, Marburg, Germany
Patricia A. Reuter-Lorenz
Affiliation:
Professor of Psychology University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA
Paul B. Baltes
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Bildungsforschung, Berlin
Patricia A. Reuter-Lorenz
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Frank Rösler
Affiliation:
Philipps-Universität Marburg, Germany
Get access

Summary

The main objective of this book is to advance research and theory in the study of brain–culture relationships. Contentwise, our primary arena is the study of human behavior, in general, and human development, in particular. When speaking of human development, we refer to the view that human development is a lifelong process, extending from conception into old age. When we speak of culture in this context, we use it in its most general sense and mean to include all aspects of the environment – physical, material, social, and symbolic.

On the one hand, we note the already existing and recently strengthened connections between researchers and scholars in the neuro, behavioral, social, and cultural sciences that give testimony to a new level of “interdisiplinarity.” It is increasingly recognized that such collaborative work, aimed at a more explicit treatment of the brain–culture interface, is necessary to better understand the interactive systems that shape the human mind and its development.

On the other hand, we also suggest that there are lacunae or misunderstandings in recognizing the full reciprocal nature of the brain–culture interaction. One example is the occasionally high emphasis that brain researchers place on brain determinism. A similar one-sidedness exists among some social scientists when they engage themselves in demonstrating the exclusive role of social-cultural environmental conditions. To counteract such lacunae or one-sided perspectives, we introduce a new “metatheoretical” paradigm as a guiding principle. This is the principle of developmental biocultural co-constructivism.

Type
Chapter
Information
Lifespan Development and the Brain
The Perspective of Biocultural Co-Constructivism
, pp. 3 - 39
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amaral, L. A. N., Díaz-Guilera, A., Moreira, A. A., Goldberger, A. L., & Lipsitz, L. A. (2004). Emergence of complex dynamics in a simple model of signaling networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA), 101, 15551–15555CrossRef
Assmann, A. (2006). Memory, individual and collective. In R. E. Goodin & C. Tilly (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of contextual political analysis (pp. 210–224). Oxford: UP 2006
Bäckman, L., & Dixon, R. A. (1992). Psychological compensation: A theoretical framework. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 1–25CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baltes, P. B. (1997). On the incomplete architecture of human ontogeny: Selection, optimization, and compensation as foundation of developmental theory. American Psychologist, 52, 366–380CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baltes, P. B., & Baltes, M. M. (1990). Psychological perspectives on successful aging: The model of selective optimization with compensation. In P. B. Baltes & M. M. Baltes (Eds.), Successful aging: Perspectives from the behavioral sciences (pp. 1–34). Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baltes, P. B., & Labouvie, G. V. (1973). Adult development of intellectual performance: Description, explanation, and modification. In C. Eisdorfer & M. P. Lawton (Eds.), The psychology of adult development and aging (pp. 157–219). Washington, DC:American Psychological AssociationGoogle Scholar
Baltes, P. B., & Lindenberger, U. (1988). On the range of cognitive plasticity in old age as a function of experience: 15 years of intervention research. Behavior Therapy, 19, 283–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baltes, P. B., Lindenberger, U., & Staudinger, U. M. (1998). Life-span theory in developmental psychology. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1. Theoretical models of human development (5th ed., pp. 1029–1143). New York:WileyGoogle Scholar
, P. B., Lindenberger, U., & Staudinger, U. M. (2006). Lifespan theory in developmental psychology. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Theoretical models of human development: Vol. 1. Handbook of child psychology (6th ed., pp. 569–664). New York:Wiley
Baltes, P. B., Reese, H. W., & Lipsitt, L. P. (1980). Life-span developmental psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 65–110CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baltes, P. B., Reese, H. W., & Nesselroade, J. R. (1977). Life-span developmental psychology: Introduction to research methods. Monterey, CA:Brooks/ColeGoogle Scholar
Baltes, P. B., & Schaie, K. W. (1976). On the plasticity of intelligence in adulthood and old age: Where Horn and Donaldson fail. American Psychologist, 31, 720–725CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baltes, P. B., & Singer, T. (2001). Plasticity and the ageing mind: An exemplar of the bio-cultural orchestration of brain and behaviour. European Review, 9, 59–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baltes, P. B., & Staudinger, U. M. (Eds.). (1996). Interactive minds: Life-span perspectives on the social foundation of cognition. Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Baltes, P. B., Staudinger, U. M., & Lindenberger, U. (1999). Lifespan psychology: Theory and application to intellectual functioning. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 471–507CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (Eds.). (1992). The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture.New York:Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Beer, R. D. (2000). Dynamical approaches to cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4 (3), 91–99CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brandtstädter, J., & Lerner, R. M. (Eds.). (1999). Action and self development: Theory and research through the life span. Thousand Oaks, CA:SageGoogle Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, U. (2001). Bioecological theory of human development. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 6963–6970). Oxford, UK: ElsevierGoogle Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, U., & Ceci, S. J. (1994). Nature–nuture reconceptualized in developmental perspective: A bioecological model. Psychological Review, 101, 568–586CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caspi, A., Roberts, B. W., & Shiner, R. L. (2005). Personality development: Stability and change. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 453–484CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cavallis-Sforza, L. L., & Feldman, M. W. (1973). Cultural versus biological inheritance: Phenotypic transmission from parents to children (A theory of the effect of parental phenotypes on children's phenotypes). American Journal of Human Genetics, 25, 618–637Google Scholar
Cicchetti, D. (2002). The impact of social experiences on neurobiological systems: Illustration from a constructivist view of child maltreatment. Cognitive Development, 17 (3–4), 1407–1428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, A. (1999). An embodied cognitive science?Trends in Cognitive Science, 3, 345–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. J. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58, 10–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, M. (1996). Interacting minds in a life-span perspective: A cultural/historical approach to culture and cognitive development. In P. B. Baltes & U. M. Staudinger (Eds.), Interactive minds: Life-span perspectives on the social foundation of cognition (pp. 59–87). New York:Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Cotman, C. W. (Ed.). (1985). Synaptic plasticity. New York: GuilfordGoogle Scholar
Dannefer, D. (2003). Cumulative advantage/disadvantage and the life course: Cross-fertilizing age and social science theory. Journals of Gerontology, 58b, S327–S337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunbar, R. I. M. (2003). The social brain: Mind, language, and society in evolutionary perspective. Annual Review of Anthropology, 32, 163–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durham, W. H. (1991). Coevolution: Genes, culture and human diversity.Stanford, CA:Stanford University PressGoogle Scholar
Ehrlich, P., & Feldman, M. W. (2003). Genes and cultures: What creates our behavioral phenome?Current Anthropology, 44 (1), 87–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gärdenfors, P. (2003). How homo became sapiens: On the evolution of the thinking. Oxford, UK:Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Gehlen, A. (1956). Urmensch und Spätkultur.Bonn: AthenäumGoogle Scholar
Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. M., & the ABC Research Group (Eds.). (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Gottlieb, G. (1982). Individual development and evolution: The genesis of novel behavior. New York:Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Gottlieb, G. (2002). Developmental-behavioral initiation of evolutionary change. Psychological Review, 109 (2), 211–218CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gottlieb, G., Wahlsten, D., & Lickliter, R. (1998). The significance of biology for human development: A developmental psychobiological systems view. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1. Theoretical models of human development (5th ed., pp. 233–273). New York:WileyGoogle Scholar
Greenfield, S. (2000). The private life of the brain. New York: Penguin PressGoogle Scholar
Greenough, W. T., & Black, J. E. (1992). Induction of brain structure by experience: Substrates for cognitive development. In M. R. Gunnar & C. A. Nelson (Eds.), Minnesota symposium on child psychology: Vol. 24. Developmental behavioral neuroscience (pp. 155–200). Hillsdale, NJ:ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
Hagen, E. H., & Hammerstein, P. (2005). Evolutionary biology and the strategic view of ontogeny: Genetic strategies provide robustness and flexibility in the life course. Research in Human Development, 2 (1), 87–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckhausen, J. (1998). Developmental regulation in adulthood: Age normative and sociostructural constraints as adaptive challenges. New York:Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jablonka, E., & Lamb, M. J. (2001). Epigenetic inheritance. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 4706–4710). Oxford, UK: ElsevierGoogle Scholar
, E., & Lamb, M. J. (2005). Evolution in four dimensions: Genetic, epigenetic, behavioral, and symbolic variation in the history of life. Cambridge, MA:MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A., & Clark, A. (1993). What's special about the human mind/brain? A reply to Abrahamsen, Bechtel, Dennett, Plunkett, Scutt & O'Hara. Mind & Language, 8 (3), 569–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelso, S. (1995). Dynamic patterns. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by.Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Lambourn, D. (2001). Metaphor and its role in social thought. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 9728–9743). Oxford, UK: ElsevierGoogle Scholar
Leary, D. E. (Ed.). (1990). Metaphors in the history of psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Lerner, R. M. (1984). On the nature of human plasticity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
, R. M. (2002). Concepts and theories of human development (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
Li, S.-C. (2001). Aging mind: Facets and levels of analysis. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 310–317). Oxford, UK:ElsevierGoogle Scholar
Li, S.-C. (2003). Biocultural orchestration of developmental plasticity across levels: The interplay of biology and culture in shaping the mind and behavior across the life span. Psychological Bulletin, 129 (2), 171–194CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, S.-C., Lindenberger, U., Hommel, B., Aschersleben, G., Prinz, W., & Baltes, P. B. (2004). Transformations in the couplings among intellectual abilities and constituent cognitive processes across the life span. Psychological Science, 15 (3), 155–163CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, S.-C., Lindenberger, U., & Sikström, S. (2001). Aging cognition: From neuromodulation to representation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 479–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindenberger, U., & Baltes, P. B. (1999). Die Entwicklungspsychologie der Lebensspanne (Lifespan-Psychologie): Johann Nicolaus Tetens (1736–1807) zu ehren. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 207, 299–323Google Scholar
Magnusson, D. (Ed.). (1996). The life-span development of individuals: Behavioral, neurobiological and psychosocial perspectives: A synthesis. Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Markman, A. B., & Dietrich, E. (2000). Extending the classical view of representation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 470–475CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayer, K. U. (2003). The sociology of the life course and lifespan psychology: Diverging or converging pathways? In U. M. Staudinger & U. Lindenberger (Eds.), Understanding human development: Dialogues with lifespan psychology (pp. 463–481). Boston:Kluwer AcademicGoogle Scholar
Molenaar, P. C. M., Huizenga, H. M., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2003). The relationship between the structure of inter-individual and intra-individual variability: A theoretical and empirical vindication of developmental systems theory. In U. M. Staudinger & U. Lindenberger (Eds.), Understanding human development: Dialogues with lifespan psychology (pp. 339–360). Boston:Kluwer AcademicGoogle Scholar
Nelson, C. A. (2000). Neural plasticity and human development: The role of early experience in sculpting memory systems. Developmental Science, 3, 115–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nesselroade, J. R. (2002). Elaborating the differential in differential psychology. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 37, 543–561CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108, 291–310CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Odling-Smee, F. J., Laland, K. N., & Feldman, M. (2003). Niche construction: The neglected process in evolution.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Port, R., & Gelder, T. (Eds.). (1995). Mind as motion: Dynamics, behavior, and cognition. Cambridge, MA:MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Quartz, S. (1999). The constructivist brain. Trends in Cognitive Science, 3, 48–57CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quartz, S. R., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1997). The neural basis of cognitive development: A constructivist manifesto. Behavioral and Brain Science, 20, 537–596CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schaie, K. W. (2005). Developmental influences on intelligence: The Seattle Longitudinal Study. New York:Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schooler, C., Mulatu, M. S., & Oates, G. (1999). The continuing effects of substantively complex work on the intellectual functioning of older workers. Psychology and Aging, 14, 483–506CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Settersten, R. A. Jr. (2005). Toward a stronger partnership between life-course sociology and life-span psychology. Research in Human Development, 2 (1/2), 25–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, W. (2003). The nature–nurture problem revisited. In U. M. Staudinger & U. Lindenberger (Eds.), Understandung human development: Dialogues with lifespan psychology (pp. 437–447). Boston:Kluwer AcademicGoogle Scholar
Staudinger, U. M., & Lindenberger, U. (Eds.). (2003). Understanding human development: Dialogues with lifespan psychology. Dordrecht, The Netherlands:Kluwer AcademicCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. (1990). Metaphors of mind: Conceptions of the nature of intelligence. New York:Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. (2004). Culture and intelligence. American Psychologist, 59, 325–338CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tetens, J. N. (1777). Philosophische Versuche über die menschliche Natur und ihre Entwicklung.Leipzig, Germany: Weidmanns Erben und ReichGoogle Scholar
Thelen, E., & Smith, L. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Valsiner, J., & Lawrence, J. A. (1997). Human development in culture across the life-span. In J. W. Berry, P. R. Dasen, & T. S. Saraswathi (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 69–106). Boston: Allyn & BaconGoogle Scholar
Vandermeer, J. (2004, January 23). Evolution: The importance of a constructivist view. Science, 472–474Google Scholar
Willis, S. L. (1987). Cognitive training and everyday competence. In K. W. Schaie & C. Eisdorfer (Eds.), Annual review of gerontology and geriatrics (Vol. 7, pp. 159–188). New York: SpringerGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×