Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T23:25:04.734Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2018

Lewis D. Sargentich
Lewis D. Sargentich
Affiliation:
Harvard Law School, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Liberal Legality
A Unified Theory of Our Law
 , pp. 169 - 170
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, John (1780). Part the First, Art. XXX in Constitution of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Anonymous, (1886). “The Basis of Individualism,” The Westminster Review, vol. 126, 118, July 1886.Google Scholar
Austin, John (1832). “The Province of Jurisprudence Determined,” in Christie, G. C., ed., Jurisprudence: Text and Readings on the Philosophy of Law (1973).Google Scholar
Bohannan, Paul (1973). “The Differing Realms of Law” (1965) in Black, D. and Milesky, M., eds., The Social Organization of Law.Google Scholar
Coke, Edward (1607). “Prohibitions Del Roy” (November 10, 1607), in Fraser, J. F., ed., The Reports of Sir Edward Coke, vol. VI (1826).Google Scholar
Culler, Jonathan (1982). On Deconstruction.Google Scholar
Dalton, Clare (1985). “An Essay in the Deconstruction of Contract Doctrine,” 94 Yale Law Journal 997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derrida, Jacques (1981). Positions (A. Bass, trans.).Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald (1967). “The Model of Rules,” 35 University of Chicago Law Review 14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald (1975). “Hard Cases,” 88 Harvard Law Review 1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald (1977a). “No Right Answer?” in Hacker, P. M. S. and Raz, J., eds., Law, Morality, and Society.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald (1977b). Taking Rights Seriously.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald (1978). “Is There Really No Right Answer in Hard Cases?” in Dworkin (1985), p. 136.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald (1985). A Matter of Principle.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald (1986). Law’s Empire.Google Scholar
Fish, Stanley (1980). Is There a Text in This Class?Google Scholar
Fiss, Owen M. (1982). “Objectivity and Interpretation,” 34 Stanford Law Review 739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fried, Charles (1981). Contract as Promise: A Theory of Contractual Obligation.Google Scholar
Frug, Gerald E. (1984). “The Ideology of Bureaucracy in American Law,” 97 Harvard Law Review 1276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, Lon (1958). “Positivism and Fidelity to Law – A Reply to Professor Hart,” 71 Harvard Law Review 630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, Lon (1968). Anatomy of the Law.Google Scholar
Gabel, Peter (1980). “Reification in Legal Reasoning,” Research in Law and Sociology, vol. 3, 25 (Spitzer, S., ed.).Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol (1982). In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1979). Communication and the Evolution of Society (T. McCarthy, trans.).Google Scholar
Hamilton, William (1861). “Lecture VII,” in Mansel, H. and Veitch, J., eds., Lectures on Metaphysics, vol. 1, 2nd edn.Google Scholar
Hart, Herbert Lionel Adolphus (1958). “Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals,” 71 Harvard Law Review 593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, Herbert Lionel Adolphus (1961). The Concept of Law (2nd edn., 1994).Google Scholar
Hart, Henry M. Jr. and Sacks, Albert M. (1958). The Legal Process: Basic Problems in the Making and Application of Law (tent. edn., 1958; Eskridge, W. and Frickey, P., eds., 1994).Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich (1944). The Road to Serfdom.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich (1960). The Constitution of Liberty.Google Scholar
Hempel, Carl Gustav (1962). “Deductive-Nomological vs. Statistical Explanation,” in Feigl, H. and Maxwell, G., eds., Scientific Explanation, Space, and Time.Google Scholar
Holmes, Oliver Wendell Jr. (1881). The Common Law (Howe, M. D., ed., 1963).Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce (1985). This Sex Which Is Not One (C. Porter, trans.).Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan (1997). A Critique of Adjudication.Google Scholar
Locke, John (1689). The Second Treatise of Government (Gough, J. W., ed., 1956).Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas (1982). The Differentiation of Society (S. Holmes and C. Laramore, trans.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair (1981). After Virtue.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl (1875). “Critique of the Gotha Program,” in Marx, K. and Engels, F., eds., Selected Works, vol. II (Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House, 1962).Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart (1865). An Examination of Sir William Hamilton’s Philosophy, vol. 2 (Boston).Google Scholar
Montesquieu, Baron de La Brède et de (1748). The Spirit of the Laws, vol. 2 (T. Nugent trans., 1949).Google Scholar
Nagel, Ernest (1961). The Structure of Science.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, Franz (1944). Behemoth: The Structure and Practice of National Socialism, 1933–1944 (1942; 2nd edn. with appendix, 1944).Google Scholar
Rawls, John (1971). A Theory of Justice.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John (1993). Political Liberalism.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph (1979). The Authority of Law.Google Scholar
Searle, John R. (1969). Speech Acts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unger, Roberto M. (1975). Knowledge and Politics.Google Scholar
Unger, Roberto M. (1976). Law in Modern Society.Google Scholar
Unger, Roberto M. (1983). “The Critical Legal Studies Movement,” 96 Harvard Law Review 561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unger, Roberto M. (1984). Passion: An Essay on Personality.Google Scholar
Voltaire, (1752). “Thoughts on the Public Administration,” para. xx in The Works of Voltaire, vol. 37 (Fleming, trans., 1901).Google Scholar
Warren, Samuel D. and Brandeis, Louis D. (1890). “The Right to Privacy,” 4 Harvard Law Review 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Max (1925). Economy and Society, vol. 2 (Roth, G. and Wittich, C., eds., 1978).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Lewis D. Sargentich, Harvard Law School, Massachusetts
  • Book: Liberal Legality
  • Online publication: 20 April 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108673860.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Lewis D. Sargentich, Harvard Law School, Massachusetts
  • Book: Liberal Legality
  • Online publication: 20 April 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108673860.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Lewis D. Sargentich, Harvard Law School, Massachusetts
  • Book: Liberal Legality
  • Online publication: 20 April 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108673860.015
Available formats
×