Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-rvbq7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T13:20:29.949Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2017

Julia Jorati
Julia Jorati
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Leibniz on Causation and Agency , pp. 208 - 216
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, Robert Merrihew. 2014. “Justice, Happiness, and Perfection in Leibniz’s City of God.” In New Essays on Leibniz’s Theodicy, eds. Jorgensen, Larry M. and Newlands, Samuel, 197–217. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Adams, Robert Merrihew. 2005. “Moral Necessity.” In Leibniz: Nature and Freedom, eds. Rutherford, Donald and Cover, Jan A., 181–93. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Adams, Robert Merrihew. 1996. “Response to Carriero, Mugnai, and Garber.” Leibniz Review 6: 107–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, Robert Merrihew. 1994. Leibniz: Determinist, Theist, Idealist. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Anfray, Jean-Pascal. 2011. “Leibniz, le choix du meilleur et la nécessité morale.” In Lectures et interprétations des Essais de théodicée de G. W. Leibniz, ed. Rateau, Paul, 49–68. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Antognazza, Maria Rosa. 2014. “Primary Matter, Primitive Passive Power, and Creaturely Limitation in Leibniz.” Studia Leibnitiana 46 (2): 167–86.Google Scholar
Arthur, Richard. 2001. “Introduction.” In The Labyrinth of the Continuum: Writings on the Continuum Problem, 1672–1686, ed. Arthur, Richard, xxiii–lxxxviii. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Audi, Robert. 1993. Action, Intention, and Reason. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Audi, Robert. 1979. “Weakness of Will and Practical Judgment.” Noûs 13 (2): 173–96.Google Scholar
Barth, Christian. 2011. “Leibnizian Conscientia and Its Cartesian Roots.” Studia Leibnitiana 43 (2): 216–36.Google Scholar
Baxter, Donald. 2000. “Leibniz on Contingent Conceptual Truths in the Arnauld Correspondence.” Studia Leibnitiana 32 (2): 191–214.Google Scholar
Bennett, Jonathan. 2005. “Leibniz’s Two Realms.” In Leibniz: Nature and Freedom, eds. Rutherford, Donald and Cover, Jan A., 135–55. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blumenfeld, David. 1995. “Perfection and Happiness in the Best Possible World.” In The Cambridge Companion to Leibniz, ed. Jolley, Nicholas, 382–410. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blumenfeld, David. 1988. “Freedom, Contingency, and Things Possible in Themselves.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 49 (1): 81–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumenfeld, David. 1973. “Leibniz’s Theory of the Striving Possibles.” Studia Leibnitiana 5 (2): 163–77.Google Scholar
Bobro, Marc E. 2013. “Leibniz on Causation.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Zalta, Edward N. (Summer 2013 Edition) https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2013/entries/leibniz-causation/.Google Scholar
Bobro, Marc E. 2008. “Leibniz on Concurrence and Efficient Causation.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 46 (3): 317–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobro, Marc E. 2004. Self and Substance in Leibniz. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Bobro, Marc E. and Clatterbaugh, Kenneth. 1996. “Unpacking the Monad: Leibniz’s Theory of Causality.” Monist 79 (3): 408–25.Google Scholar
Bolton, Martha Brandt. 2013. “Change in the Monad.” In The Divine Order, the Human Order, and the Order of Nature: Historical Perspectives, ed. Watkins, Eric, 175–94. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bolton, Martha Brandt. 2011. “Leibniz’s Theory of Cognition.” In The Continuum Companion to Leibniz, ed. Look, Brandon, 136–58. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Bolton, Martha Brandt. 2008. “Locke and Leibniz on the Structure of Substance and Powers: The Metaphysics of Moral Subjects.” In Studies on Locke: Sources, Contemporaries, and Legacy, eds. Hutton, Sarah and Schuurmann, Paul, 107–26. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Brown, Gregory. 2016. “Leibniz on the Ground of Moral Normativity and Obligation.” Leibniz Review 26: 11–62.Google Scholar
Brown, Gregory. 2011. “Disinterested Love: Understanding Leibniz’s Reconciliation of Self- and Other-Regarding Motives.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (2): 265–303.Google Scholar
Brown, Gregory. 1992. “Is There a Pre-established Harmony of Aggregates in the Leibnizian Dynamics, or Do Non-substantial Bodies Interact?” Journal of the History of Philosophy 30 (1): 53–75.Google Scholar
Carlin, Laurence. 2012. “Boyle’s Teleological Mechanism and the Myth of Immanent Teleology.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 43 (1): 54–63.Google Scholar
Carlin, Laurence. 2006. “Leibniz on Final Causes.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (2): 217–33.Google Scholar
Carlin, Laurence. 2000. “Leibniz’s Great Chain of Being.” Studia Leibnitiana 32 (2): 131–50.Google Scholar
Carriero, John. 2008. “Substance and Ends in Leibniz.” In Contemporary Perspectives on Early Modern Philosophy: Essays in Honor of Vere Chappell, eds. Hoffman, Paul, Owen, David, and Yaffe, Gideon, 115–40. Peterborough: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
Carriero, John. 2005. “Spinoza on Final Causality.” In Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy, eds. Garber, Daniel and Nadler, Steven. Vol. 2, 105–47. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Carriero, John. 1996. “Symposium on Leibniz: Determinist, Theist, Idealist by Robert Merrihew Adams.” Leibniz Review 6: 61–77.Google Scholar
Carriero, John. 1993. “Leibniz on Infinite Resolution and Intramundane Contingency – Part One: Infinite Resolution.” Studia Leibnitiana 25 (1): 1–26.Google Scholar
Carriero, John. 1991. “Spinoza’s Views on Necessity in Historical Perspective.” Philosophical Topics 19 (1): 47–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chappell, Vere. 2005. “Self-Determination.” In Early Modern Philosophy: Mind, Matter, and Metaphysics, eds. Mercer, Christia and O’Neill, Eileen, 127–41. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clatterbaugh, Kenneth. 1973. Leibniz’s Doctrine of Individual Accidents. Studia Leibnitiana Sonderheft 4. Wiesbaden: Steiner.Google Scholar
Cover, Jan A. and O’Leary-Hawthorne, John. 1999. Substance and Individuation in Leibniz. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cox, Donovan. 2002. “Leibniz on Divine Causation: Creation, Miracles, and the Continual Fulgurations.” Studia Leibnitiana 34 (2): 185–207.Google Scholar
Craig, Edward. 1996. The Mind of God and the Works of Man. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald. 2001 [1970]. “How is Weakness of the Will Possible?” In Essays on Actions and Events. 2nd edn., 21–42. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, Jack. 2005. “Video Meliora Proboque, Deteriora Sequor.” In Leibniz: Nature and Freedom, eds. Rutherford, Donald and Cover, Jan A., 234–52. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, Jack. 1998. “Imitators of God: Leibniz on Human Freedom.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 36 (3): 387–412.Google Scholar
Della Rocca, Michael. 2013. “Striving, Oomph, and Intelligibility in Spinoza.” In Judgement and the Epistemic Foundation of Logic, ed. van der Schaar, Maria, 49–65. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Della Rocca, Michael. 1996. “Spinoza’s Metaphysical Psychology.” In The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza, ed. Garrett, Don, 192–266. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel C. 1984. Elbow Room: The Varieties of Free Will Worth Wanting. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Des Chene, Dennis. 1996. Physiologia: Natural Philosophy in Late Aristotelian and Cartesian Thought. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Di Bella, Stefano. 2015. “Hylomorphism (Even) without Matter? Transtemporal Sameness and the Rehabilitation of Substantial Form in Leibniz’s Theory of Substance.” In Leibniz’s Metaphysics and Adoption of Substantial Forms: Between Continuity and Transformation, ed. Nita, Adrian, 43–58. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Bella, Stefano. 2008. “Causa Sive Ratio: Univocity of Reason and Plurality of Causes in Leibniz.” In Leibniz: What Kind of Rationalist? ed. Dascal, Marcelo, 495–509. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Dicker, Georges. 1982. “Leibniz on Necessary and Contingent Propositions.” Studia Leibnitiana 14 (2): 221–32.Google Scholar
Fischer, John Martin and Ravizza, Mark. 1998. Responsibility and Control: A Theory of Moral Responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Frankel, Lois. 1984. “Being Able to Do Otherwise: Leibniz on Freedom and Contingency.” Studia Leibnitiana 16: 45–59.Google Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry G. 1988. The Importance of What We Care About: Philosophical Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freddoso, Alfred J. 1988. “Introduction.” In Luis de Molina, on Divine Foreknowledge (Part IV of the Concordia), ed. Freddoso, Alfred J., 1–81. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Garber, Daniel. 2015. “Monads on My Mind.” In Leibniz’s Metaphysics and Adoption of Substantial Forms: Between Continuity and Transformation, ed. Nita, Adrian, 107–76. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Garber, Daniel. 2009. Leibniz: Body, Substance, Monad. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Garrett, Don. 1990. “Truth, Method, and Correspondence in Spinoza and Leibniz.” Studia Spinozana 6: 13–41.Google Scholar
Gennaro, Rocco J. 1999. “Leibniz on Consciousness and Self-Consciousness.” In New Essays on the Rationalists, eds. Gennaro, Rocco J. and Huenemann, Charles, 353–71. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Sean. 2005. “Leibniz against Molinism: Freedom, Indifference, and the Nature of the Will.” In Leibniz: Nature and Freedom, eds. Rutherford, Donald and Cover, Jan A., 217–33. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Griffin, Michael V. 2013. Leibniz, God and Necessity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grimm, Robert. 1970. “Individual Concepts and Contingent Truths.” Studia Leibnitiana 2 (3): 200–23.Google Scholar
Hartz, Glenn A. 1996. “Exactly How Are Leibnizian Substances Related to Extension?” In Leibniz’s “New System” (1695), ed. Woolhouse, Roger S., 63–81. Florence: Olschki.Google Scholar
Hawthorne, John and Cover, Jan A.. 2000. “Infinite Analysis and the Problem of the Lucky Proof.” Studia Leibnitiana 32 (2): 151–65.Google Scholar
Hirschmann, David. 1988. “The Kingdom of Wisdom and the Kingdom of Power in Leibniz.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 88: 147–59.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas and Bramhall, John. 1999. Hobbes and Bramhall: On Liberty and Necessity, ed. Chappell, Vere. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Paul. 2009. “Does Efficient Causation Presuppose Final Causation? Aquinas vs. Early Modern Mechanism.” In Metaphysics and the Good: Themes from the Philosophy of Robert Merrihew Adams, eds. Newlands, Samuel and Jorgensen, Larry M., 295–312. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas S. 1998. “Spontaneität.” In Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, ed. Ritter, Joachim. Vol. 9, 1424–34. Basel: Schwabe.Google Scholar
Hostler, John. 1975. Leibniz’s Moral Philosophy. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Imlay, Robert A. 2002. “Leibniz on Freedom of the Will: A Vindication.” Studia Leibnitiana 34 (1): 81–90.Google Scholar
Irwin, Terence H. 1992. “Who Discovered the Will?” Philosophical Perspectives 6: 453–73.Google Scholar
Jalabert, Jacques. 1960. Le Dieu de Leibniz. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Jauernig, Anja. 2010. “Disentangling Leibniz’s Views on Relations and Extrinsic Denominations.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (2): 171–205.Google Scholar
Johnson, Monte Ransome. 2005. Aristotle on Teleology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jolley, Nicholas. 2005. Leibniz. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jolley, Nicholas. 1998. “Causality and Creation in Leibniz.” Monist 81 (4): 591–611.Google Scholar
Jorati, Julia. Forthcoming a. “Leibniz on Appetitions and Desires.” In History of Philosophy of Mind, eds. Shields, Christopher and Copenhaver, Becko. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jorati, Julia. Forthcoming b. “Leibniz’s Ontology of Force.” In Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy, eds. Garber, Daniel and Rutherford, Donald. Vol. 8. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Jorati, Julia. 2017. “Gottfried Leibniz [on Free Will].” In The Routledge Companion to Free Will, eds. Timpe, Kevin, Griffith, Meghan, and Levy, Neil, 293–302. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jorati, Julia. 2015. “Three Types of Spontaneity and Teleology in Leibniz.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 53 (4): 669–98.Google Scholar
Jorati, Julia. 2014a. “Leibniz’s Twofold Gap between Moral Knowledge and Motivation.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22 (4): 748–66.Google Scholar
Jorati, Julia. 2014b. “Review of Michael V. Griffin, Leibniz, God and Necessity.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 52 (1): 172–3.Google Scholar
Jorati, Julia. 2013. “Monadic Teleology without Goodness and without God.” The Leibniz Review 23: 43–72.Google Scholar
Jorgensen, Larry M. 2015. “Leibniz on Perceptual Distinctness, Activity, and Sensation.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 53 (1): 49–77.Google Scholar
Jorgensen, Larry M. 2013. “By Leaps and Bounds: Leibniz on Transcreation, Motion, and the Generation of Minds.” The Leibniz Review 23: 73–98.Google Scholar
Jorgensen, Larry M. 2011a. “Mind the Gap: Reflection and Consciousness in Leibniz.” Studia Leibnitiana 43 (2): 179–95.Google Scholar
Jorgensen, Larry M. 2011b. “Leibniz on Memory and Consciousness.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (5): 887–916.Google Scholar
Jorgensen, Larry M. 2009. “The Principle of Continuity and Leibniz’s Theory of Consciousness.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 47 (2): 223–48.Google Scholar
Kaphagawani, Didier Njirayamanda. 1999. Leibniz on Freedom and Determinism in Relation to Aquinas and Molina. Brookfield: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Knebel, Sven K. 2000. Wille, Würfel und Wahrscheinlichkeit: Das System der moralischen Notwendigkeit in der Jesuitenscholastik 1550–1700. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Knebel, Sven K. 1991. “Necessitas moralis ad optimum: Zum historischen Hintergrund der Wahl der besten der möglichen Welten.” Studia Leibnitiana 23 (1): 3–24.Google Scholar
Kulstad, Mark. 2006. “Leibniz on Expression: Reflections after Three Decades.” In Einheit in der Vielheit: Vorträge; VIII. Internationaler Leibniz-Kongress, Hannover, 24. bis 29. Juli 2006, eds. Breger, Herbert, Herbst, Jürgen, and Erdner, Sven. Vol. 1, 413–9. Hannover: Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Gesellschaft.Google Scholar
Kulstad, Mark. 1993. “Causation and Preestablished Harmony in the Early Development of Leibniz’s Philosophy.” In Causation in Early Modern Philosophy: Cartesianism, Occasionalism, and Preestablished Harmony, ed. Nadler, Steven, 93–118. University Park: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
Kulstad, Mark. 1991. Leibniz on Apperception, Consciousness, and Reflection. Munich: Philosophia.Google Scholar
Kulstad, Mark. 1990. “Appetition in the Philosophy of Leibniz.” In Mathesis Rationis: Festschrift für Heinrich Schepers, eds. Heinekamp, Albert, Lenzen, Wolfgang, and Schneider, Martin, 133–51. Munster: Nodus.Google Scholar
Kulstad, Mark. 1977. “Leibniz’s Conception of Expression.” Studia Leibnitiana 9: 55–76.Google Scholar
Lærke, Mogens. 2009. “The Problem of Alloglossia: Leibniz on Spinoza’s Innovative Use of Philosophical Language.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (5): 939–53.Google Scholar
Lærke, Mogens. 2007. “Contingency, Necessity, and the Being of Possibility: Leibniz’s Modal Ontology in Relation to His Refutation of Spinoza.” Revue Roumaine de Philosophie 51 (1–2): 39–62.Google Scholar
Lagerlund, Henrik and Myrdal, Peter. 2006. “Possible Worlds and the Nature of Choice in Leibniz.” Studia Leibnitiana 38 (2): 156–76.Google Scholar
Lee, Sukjae. 2014. “Toward a New Reading of Leibnizian Appetites: Appetites as Uneasiness.” Res Philosophica 91 (1): 123–50.Google Scholar
Lee, Sukjae. 2006. “Leibniz on Spontaneity: A Sketch of Formal and Final Causation.” In Einheit in der Vielheit: Vorträge; VIII. Internationaler Leibniz-Kongress, Hannover, 24. bis 29. Juli 2006, eds. Breger, Herbert, Herbst, Jürgen, and Erdner, Sven. Vol. 1, 440–7. Hannover: Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Gesellschaft.Google Scholar
Lee, Sukjae. 2004. “Leibniz on Divine Concurrence.” Philosophical Review 113 (2): 203–48.Google Scholar
Lin, Martin. 2014. “Efficient Causation in Spinoza and Leibniz.” In Efficient Causation: A History, ed. Schmaltz, Tad M., 165–91. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lin, Martin. 2012. “Rationalism and Necessitarianism.” Nous 46 (3): 418–48.Google Scholar
Lodge, Paul. 2015. “Corporeal Substances as Monadic Composites in Leibniz’s Later Philosophy.” In Leibniz’s Metaphysics and Adoption of Substantial Forms: Between Continuity and Transformation, ed. Nita, Adrian, 107–24. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Look, Brandon and Rutherford, Donald. 2007. “Introduction.” In The Leibniz-Des Bosses Correspondence, eds. Look, Brandon and Rutherford, Donald, xix–lxxix. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lovejoy, Arthur O. 1936. The Great Chain of Being: A Study of the History of an Idea. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Scott. 1991. “The Relation between Being and Goodness.” In Being and Goodness: The Concept of the Good in Metaphysics and Philosophical Theology, ed. MacDonald, Scott, 1–28. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Madden, James D. 2003. “Leibniz on Teleology and the Intelligibility of Nature.” Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 77: 173–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonough, Jeffrey K. 2016a. “Leibniz and the Foundations of Physics: The Later Years.” Philosophical Review 125 (1): 1–34.Google Scholar
McDonough, Jeffrey K. 2016b. “Leibniz on Monadic Agency and Optimal Form.” In Leibniz’s Experimental Philosophy, ed. Pelletier, Arnaud, 93–120. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
McDonough, Jeffrey K. 2011. “The Heyday of Teleology and Early Modern Philosophy.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 35: 179–204.Google Scholar
McDonough, Jeffrey K. 2008. “Leibniz’s Two Realms Revisited.” Noûs 42 (4): 673–96.Google Scholar
McDonough, Jeffrey K. 2007. “Leibniz: Creation and Conservation and Concurrence.” The Leibniz Review 17: 31–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuire, James E. 1976. “‘Labyrinthus Continui’: Leibniz on Substance, Activity, and Matter.” In Motion and Time, Space and Matter, eds. Machamer, Peter K. and Turnbull, Robert G., 290–326. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
McRae, Robert. 1976. Leibniz: Perception, Apperception, and Thought. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mele, Alfred R. 2012. Backsliding: Understanding Weakness of Will. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mele, Alfred R. 1995. Autonomous Agents: From Self-Control to Autonomy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mele, Alfred R. 1987. Irrationality: An Essay on Akrasia, Self-Deception, and Self-Control. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell-Yellin, Benjamin. 2015. “The Platonic Model: Statement, Clarification and Defense.” Philosophical Explorations 18 (3): 378–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell-Yellin, Benjamin. 2014. “In Defense of the Platonic Model: A Reply to Buss.” Ethics 124 (2): 342–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mugnai, Massimo. 2012. “Leibniz’s Ontology of Relations: A Last Word?” Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy 6: 171–208.Google Scholar
Mugnai, Massimo. 1992. Leibniz’ Theory of Relations. Studia Leibnitiana Supplementa 28. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Murray, Michael J. 2005. “Spontaneity and Freedom in Leibniz.” In Leibniz: Nature and Freedom, eds. Rutherford, Donald and Cover, Jan A., 194–216. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Murray, Michael J. 2004. “Pre-Leibnizian Moral Necessity.” The Leibniz Review 14: 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, Michael J. 1995. “Leibniz on Divine Foreknowledge of Future Contingents and Human Freedom.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 (1): 75–108.Google Scholar
Nachtomy, Ohad. 2007. Possibility, Agency, and Individuality in Leibniz’s Metaphysics. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Alan. 2005. “Leibniz on Modality, Cognition, and Expression.” In A Companion to Rationalism, ed. Nelson, Alan, 282–301. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Newlands, Samuel. 2010. “The Harmony of Spinoza and Leibniz.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 81 (1): 64–104.Google Scholar
O’Connor, Timothy and Sandis, Constantine. 2010. A Companion to the Philosophy of Action. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Eileen. 1993. “Influxus Physicus.” In Causation in Early Modern Philosophy: Cartesianism, Occasionalism, and Preestablished Harmony, ed. Nadler, Steven, 27–56. University Park: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
Osler, Margaret J. 2001. “Whose Ends? Teleology in Early Modern Natural Philosophy.” Osiris 16: 151–68.Google Scholar
Pasnau, Robert. 2011. Metaphysical Themes 1274–1671. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Pasnau, Robert. 2002. Thomas Aquinas on Human Nature: A Philosophical Study of Summa Theologiae Ia, 75–89. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pasnau, Robert. 2001. “Intentionality and Final Causes.” In Ancient and Medieval Theories of Intentionality, ed. Perler, Dominik, 302–23. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Penner, Terrence. 1997. “Socrates on the Strength of Knowledge: Protagoras 351B–357E.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 79 (2): 117–49.Google Scholar
Penner, Terrence. 1990. “Plato and Davidson: Parts of the Soul and Weakness of Will.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Supplementary Volume 16: 35–74.Google Scholar
Phemister, Pauline. 2005. Leibniz and the Natural World: Activity, Passivity and Corporeal Substances in Leibniz’s Philosophy. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Phemister, Pauline. 1991. “Leibniz, Freedom of Will and Rationality.” Studia Leibnitiana 26 (1): 25–39.Google Scholar
Pickup, Martin. 2014. “Leibniz and the Necessity of the Best Possible World.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 92 (3): 507–23.Google Scholar
Puryear, Stephen. 2010. “Monadic Interaction.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (5): 763–96.Google Scholar
Rateau, Paul. 2015. Leibniz et le meilleur des mondes possibles. Paris: Classiques Garnier.Google Scholar
Rescher, Nicholas. 2001. “Contingentia Mundi: Leibniz on the World’s Contingency.” Studia Leibnitiana 33 (2): 145–62.Google Scholar
Riley, Patrick. 1996. Leibniz’s Universal Jurisprudence: Justice as the Charity of the Wise. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozemond, Marleen. 2009. “Leibniz on Final Causation.” In Metaphysics and the Good: Themes from the Philosophy of Robert Merrihew Adams, eds. Newlands, Samuel and Jorgensen, Larry M., 272–94. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1937. A Critical Exposition of the Philosophy of Leibniz. 2nd edn., London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1903. “Recent Work on the Philosophy of Leibniz.” Mind 12 (46): 177–201.Google Scholar
Rutherford, Donald. 2013. “Laws and Powers in Leibniz.” In The Divine Order, the Human Order, and the Order of Nature: Historical Perspectives, ed. Watkins, Eric, 149–74. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rutherford, Donald. 2008. “Leibniz on Infinitesimals and the Reality of Force.” In Infinitesimal Differences: Controversies between Leibniz and His Contemporaries, eds. Goldenbaum, Ursula and Jesseph, Douglas, 255–80. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Rutherford, Donald. 2005. “Leibniz on Spontaneity.” In Leibniz: Nature and Freedom, eds. Rutherford, Donald and Cover, Jan A., 156–80. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, Donald. 1995a. Leibniz and the Rational Order of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rutherford, Donald. 1995b. “Metaphysics: The Late Period.” In The Cambridge Companion to Leibniz, ed. Jolley, Nicholas, 124–75. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schmaltz, Tad M. 2014. “Moral Evil and Divine Concurrence in the Theodicy.” In New Essays on Leibniz’s Theodicy, eds. Jorgensen, Larry M. and Newlands, Samuel, 135–52. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schmaltz, Tad M. 2012. “Substantial Forms as Causes: From Suárez to Descartes.” In Matter and Form in Early Modern Science and Philosophy, ed. Manning, Gideon, 125–50. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Schmaltz, Tad M. 2008. Descartes on Causation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schmid, Stephan. 2016. “The Intrinsic Directedness of Leibnizian Forces.” In‘Für unser Glück oder das Glück anderer’: Vorträge des X. Internationalen Leibniz-Kongresses Hannover, 18.–23. Juli 2016, ed. Li, Wenchao. Vol. 5, 131–41. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Schmid, Stephan. 2011. Finalursachen in der frühen Neuzeit: eine Untersuchung der Transformation teleologischer Erklärungen. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Scott, David. 1998. “Leibniz’s Model of Creation and His Doctrine of Substance.” Animus 3: 73–88.Google Scholar
Seeskin, Kenneth R. 1977. “Moral Necessity.” The New Scholasticism 51: 90–101.Google Scholar
Seidler, Michael J. 1985. “Freedom and Moral Therapy in Leibniz.” Studia Leibnitiana 17 (1): 15–35.Google Scholar
Shields, Christopher John. 1986. “Leibniz’s Doctrine of the Striving Possibles.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 24 (3): 343–57.Google Scholar
Simmons, Alison. 2011. “Leibnizian Consciousness Reconsidered.” Studia Leibnitiana 43 (2): 196–215.Google Scholar
Simmons, Alison. 2001. “Changing the Cartesian Mind: Leibniz on Sensation, Representation and Consciousness.” The Philosophical Review 110 (1): 31–75.Google Scholar
Sleigh, Robert C. 2009. “Moral Necessity in Leibniz’s Account of Human Freedom.” In Metaphysics and the Good: Themes from the Philosophy of Robert Merrihew Adams, eds. Newlands, Samuel and Jorgensen, Larry M., 252–71. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sleigh, Robert C. 2005. “Introduction.” In Confessio philosophi: Papers Concerning the Problem of Evil, 1671–1678, ed. Sleigh, Robert C., xix–xli. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sleigh, Robert C. 1999. “Leibniz on Freedom and Necessity: Critical Notice of Robert Adams, Leibniz: Determinist, Theist, and Idealist.” The Philosophical Review 108 (2): 245–77.Google Scholar
Sleigh, Robert C. 1990a. Leibniz & Arnauld: A Commentary on Their Correspondence. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sleigh, Robert C. 1990b. “Leibniz on Malebranche on Causality.” In Central Themes in Early Modern Philosophy: Essays Presented to Jonathan Bennett, eds. Cover, Jan A. and Kulstad, Mark, 161–93. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Smith, Angela M. 2005. “Responsibility for Attitudes: Activity and Passivity in Mental Life.” Ethics 115 (2): 236–71.Google Scholar
Sotnak, Eric. 1999. “The Range of Leibnizian Compatibilism.” In New Essays on the Rationalists, eds. Gennaro, Rocco J. and Huenemann, Charles, 200–23. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stroud, Sarah. 2014. “Weakness of Will.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Zalta, Edward N. (Spring 2014 Edition) https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/weakness-will/.Google Scholar
Swoyer, Chris. 1995. “Leibnizian Expression.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 33 (1): 65–99.Google Scholar
Temmik, Aloys. 1706. Philosophia vera theologiae & medicinae ministra, in theatrum mundi dijudicanda. Cologne: W. Michahelles & J. Adolph.Google Scholar
Vailati, Ezio. 1990. “Leibniz on Locke on Weakness of Will.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 28 (2): 213–28.Google Scholar
Vailati, Ezio. 1986. “Leibniz on Necessary and Contingent Predication.” Studia Leibnitiana 18 (2): 195–210.Google Scholar
van Ruler, Johannes A. 1995. The Crisis of Causality: Voetius and Descartes on God, Nature, and Change. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
von Bodelschwingh (Jorati), Julia. 2011. “Leibniz on Concurrence, Spontaneity, and Authorship.” The Modern Schoolman 88 (3/4): 267–97.Google Scholar
Watson, Gary. 2004. Agency and Answerability: Selected Essays. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Whipple, John. 2015. “Leibniz on Substance and Causation.” In Locke and Leibniz on Substance, eds. Lodge, Paul and Stoneham, Tom, 203–30. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Whipple, John. 2010a. “Leibniz on Divine Concurrence.” Philosophy Compass 5 (10): 865–79.Google Scholar
Whipple, John. 2010b. “The Structure of Leibnizian Simple Substances.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (3): 379–410.Google Scholar
Wilson, Catherine. 1989. Leibniz’s Metaphysics: A Historical and Comparative Study. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Margaret Dauler. 1999. “Leibniz’s Dynamics and Contingency in Nature.” In Ideas and Mechanism: Essays on Early Modern Philosophy, 421–41. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wolf, Susan R. 1990. Freedom within Reason. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Youpa, Andrew. 2013. “Leibniz’s Ethics.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Zalta, Edward N. (Summer 2013 Edition) https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2013/entries/leibniz-ethics/.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Julia Jorati, Ohio State University
  • Book: Leibniz on Causation and Agency
  • Online publication: 05 July 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108131629.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Julia Jorati, Ohio State University
  • Book: Leibniz on Causation and Agency
  • Online publication: 05 July 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108131629.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Julia Jorati, Ohio State University
  • Book: Leibniz on Causation and Agency
  • Online publication: 05 July 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108131629.009
Available formats
×