Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- List of Tables
- List of Abbreviations
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 The Legacy of the Irish Party in Free State Politics, 1922–5
- 2 The Place of Home Rulers in Memoir, Commemoration and Public Discourse, 1922–5
- 3 A Legacy Party? The Irish National League, 1926–7
- 4 From the National League to Cumann na nGaedheal?
- 5 The Blueshirts and the Shadow of the Land League, 1932–4
- 6 Home Rulers in a New Ireland, 1935–49
- 7 ‘Why Not Study History!’ Remembering Parnell’s Party v. Remembering Redmond’s Party
- Conclusion
- Biographical Appendix
- Bibliography
- Index
2 - The Place of Home Rulers in Memoir, Commemoration and Public Discourse, 1922–5
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- List of Tables
- List of Abbreviations
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 The Legacy of the Irish Party in Free State Politics, 1922–5
- 2 The Place of Home Rulers in Memoir, Commemoration and Public Discourse, 1922–5
- 3 A Legacy Party? The Irish National League, 1926–7
- 4 From the National League to Cumann na nGaedheal?
- 5 The Blueshirts and the Shadow of the Land League, 1932–4
- 6 Home Rulers in a New Ireland, 1935–49
- 7 ‘Why Not Study History!’ Remembering Parnell’s Party v. Remembering Redmond’s Party
- Conclusion
- Biographical Appendix
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
Was John Redmond right or wrong? The policy they preached was a policy of vindication of John Redmond. They were not there for a political purpose, but to perform an act of national duty, which they owed to him for the noble services he had rendered to Ireland, and in some sense a penance for the wrong that their country had inflicted upon him.
J.P. Gaynor of the Redmond Anniversary Committee, quoted in Evening Star, 27 February 1924While it has been argued that Free State leaders revelled in the achievement of self-government ‘without acknowledging the groundwork laid by constitutional nationalism, since the days of Isaac Butt’, the same could not be said of the thousands who congregated in Wexford and Ennis for commemorations of John and Willie Redmond in the early 1920s. The success of such events jars with perceptions that Redmond and the Irish Party were either neglected or excoriated in the Free State. Such anniversaries even exceeded commemorations for Redmond's parliamentary idol Parnell, while other prominent commemorations held at the time had the advantage of honouring figures who were seemingly easier subjects of tribute in the post-revolutionary independent state. W.T. Cosgrave delivered the oration at the 1924 event for 1798 republican Wolfe Tone, which included a military demonstration by the Free State army, while remembrance of the youthful founding fathers of the Free State, Collins and Griffith, in front of Leinster House, were understandably major ceremonial events with official endorsement. The Redmond events, on the other hand, demonstrated a strong show of vernacular memory. They underlined the impact which the Redmonds had made on Irish political life, but they also had the potential to challenge historical narratives which suited parties with Sinn Féin derivations.
The revival of the Irish Party's place in public debate was not therefore simply confined to the election of Captain Redmond or Alfie Byrne to the Dáil. Defence of the old party circulated among private and public writings and through extant home rule networks. Much of the historiography and public debate on history in the early Free State understandably dwelt on Ireland's ‘fighting story’. Such a focus was reflective of the political situation outlined in Chapter 1 and the Civil War cleavage would influence commemoration and memory of the Rising and subsequent events for decades.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: Liverpool University PressPrint publication year: 2019