Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  • Cited by 5
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
June 2014
Print publication year:
2013
Online ISBN:
9781139856027

Book description

Lawyering for the Rule of Law introduces a new model of government lawyering in which government lawyers function as an ancillary mechanism that enables the court to expand its influence on policy-making within the political branches by forming out-of-court settlements. It discusses the centrality of government lawyers with regard to judicial mobilization and the enforcement of social reforms through adjudication, and sheds light on particular functions of government lawyers as adjudicators and facilitators of institutional arrangements. It also discusses the ethical and professional dilemmas of government lawyers in judicial review and the relationship between lawyers' professional morality and outcomes in litigation.

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Contents

Bibliography
Abel, R. L. and Lewis, P. S. C. (eds.), Lawyers in Society: An Overview (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995)
Abel, R. L. and Lewis, P. S. C.Lawyers in Society: The Common Law World (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988)
ACRI (Association for Civil Rights in Israel), “Negev Bedouins and Unrecognized Villages” (2010)
ACRI (Association for Civil Rights in Israel) Report, Negev Bedouin: Info Sheet (February 5, 2009)
Alon, G.Ex Chief Justices Support the Seniority Rule,”Ha’aretz, December 21, 1999
Alon, G.The Government Rejects the Criticism Made by Religious MKs on Justice Barak,” Ha’aretz December 12, 1994
Alon, G. and Verter, Y.The Attorney General Bar-On Resigned,” Ha’aretz, January 13, 1997
Amit-Kohn, U., Jarach, R., Glick, C. B. and Biton, N.Israel, The ‘Intifada’ and the Rule of Law (Israeli Ministry of Defense Publications, 1993)
Arian, A. et al. “Auditing Israeli Democracy: Democratic Values in Practice,” (The Israel Democracy Institute, 2010)
Atkins, B. M.Alternative Model of Appeal Mobilization in Judicial Hierarchies,” 37 Am. J. Pol. Sci. 780 (1993)
Babcock, B. A.Defending the Guilty,” 32 Clev. St. L. Rev. 175 (1983)
Baker, N. V.Conflicting Loyalties: Law and Politics in the Attorney General’s Office 1789–1990 (University Press of Kansas, 1992)
Baker, N. V. “The Attorney General as a Legal Policy-Maker: Conflicting Loyalties,” in Clayton, C. W. (ed.), Government Lawyers: The Federal Legal Bureaucracy and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kansas, 1995)
Baldwin, R. and McCrudden, C.Regulation and Public Law (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1987)
Barak-Erez, D.From an Unwritten to a Written Constitution: The Israeli Challenge in American Perspective,” 26 Colum. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 309 (1995)
Barak-Erez, D.Outlawed Pigs: Law, Religion, and Culture in Israel (University of Wisconsin Press, 2007)
Barzilai, G.Between the Rule of Law and the Laws of the Ruler: The Supreme Court in Israeli Legal Culture,” 49 (152) Int’l Soc. Sci. J. 193 (1997)
Barzilai, G.Fantasies of Liberalism and Liberal Jurisprudence: State Law and Israeli Arab-Palestinian Community,” 34 Isr. L. Rev. 425 (2000)
Barzilai, G., Yuchtman-Ya’ar, E. and Segal, Z. —“Supreme Courts and Public Opinion: General Paradigms and the Israeli Case,” 4(3) Law & Courts 3 (1994)
Barzilai, G., Yuchtman-Ya’ar, E. and Segal, Z.The Israeli Supreme Court and the Israeli Public (Tel Aviv: Papyrus, 1993)
Bash, T. and Eran, S.Bureaucratic Harassment; Abuse and Maltreatment during Operational Activities in the West Bank in the First Year of the Declaration of Principles (B’Tselem information sheet, September 1994)
Bassok, O.Television Coverage of the Israeli Supreme Court 1968–1992: The Persistence of the Mythical Image,” 42 Isr. L. Rev. 306 (2009)
Baum, L.The Supreme Court, 6th edn. (Washington, D.C.: CQ Press, 1998)
Ben-David, Y. “The Bedouin in Israel,” Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs (July 1999)
Benvenisti, E.The International Law of Occupation, 2nd edn. (Oxford University Press, 2012)
Berenson, S. K.Public Lawyers, Private Values: Can, Should, and Will Government Lawyers Serve the Public Interest?,” 41 B.C.L. Rev. 789 (2000)
Berenson, S. K.The Duty Defined: Specific Obligations that Follow from Civil Government Lawyers’ General Duty to Serve the Public Interest,” 42 Brandeis L.J. 13 (2003)
Bisharat, G. E.Courting Justice? Legitimation in Lawyering under Israeli Occupation,” 20 Law & Soc. Inquiry 349 (1995)
Black, R. C. and Owens, R. JThe Solicitor General and the United States Supreme Court (Cambridge University Press, 2012).
Blumberg, A. S. “The Practice of Law as Confidence Game,” in Aubert, V. (ed.), Sociology of Law (1969)
Bogoch, B. and Holtzman-Gazit, Y.Mutual Bonds: Media Frames and the Israeli High Court of Justice,” 33 Law & Soc. Inquiry 53 (2008)
Boon, A. and Levin, J.The Ethics and Conduct of Lawyers in England and Wales (Oxford: Hart, 2008)
Bracha, B.The Protection of Human Rights in Israel,” 12 Israel Yearbook of Human Rights 110 (1982)
B’Tselem, , “10 Years to the Second Intifada” (press release, September 27, 2010)
Canon, B. C.Defining the Dimensions of Judicial Activism,” 66 Judicature 236 (1983)
Caplan, L.The Tenth Justice: The Solicitor General and the Rule of Law (New York: Knopf, 1987)
Chayes, A.The Role of the Judge in Public Law Litigation,” 89 Harv. L. Rev. 1281 (1976)
Clark, K.Government Lawyers and Confidentiality Norms,” 85 Wash. U.L. Rev 1033 (2007)
Clayton, C. W. (ed.) Government Lawyers: The Federal Legal Bureaucracy and Presidential Policies (University Press of Kansas, 1995)
Clayton, C. W.The Politics of Justice: The Attorney General and the Making of Legal Policy (New York: M. E. Sharpe, 1992)
Cohen, S. et al. Impossible Coexistence: Human Rights in Hebron since the Massacre at the Cave of the Patriarchs (B’Tselem information sheet, September 1995)
Cross, F. B. and Lindquist, S. A.The Scientific Study of Judicial Activism,” 91 Minn. L. Rev. 1752 (2007)
Dailey, W. R.Who is the Attorney General’s Client?87 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1113 (2012)
Davis, M. and Elliston, F. A. (eds.) Ethics and the Legal Profession (New York: Prometheus Books, 1986)
De Smith, S. A., Woolf, H., Jowell, J. L. and Le Sueur, A. P.Judicial Review of Administrative Action, 5th edn., vol. I (London:Sweet & Maxwell, 1995)
Devins, N. (ed.), “Government Lawyering,” 61(1–2)Law & Contemp. Probs. 1 (1998)
Devins, N.Unitariness and Independence: Solicitor General Control over Independent Agency Litigation,” 82 Cal. L. Rev. 255 (1994)
Diver, C. S.The Judge as Political Powerbroker: Superintending Structural Change in Public Institutions,” 65 Va. L. Rev. 43 (1979)
Doron, I. et al. “A decade to ‘Amicus Curiae’: Empirical Analysis of Court Decisions,” 34 Iunei Mishpat [Law Studies] 667 (2011) (Hebrew)
Dotan, Y.Cause Lawyers Crossing the Lines: Patterns of Fragmentation and Cooperation between State and Civil Rights Lawyers in Israel,” 5 Int’l J. Legal Prof. 193 (1998)
Dotan, Y.Constitution to Israel? The Constitutional Dialog After the ‘Constitutional Revolution’,” 28 Mishpatim [Law] 149 (1997)
Dotan, Y.Does Israel Need A Constitutional Court,” 5 Mishpat Umimshal [Law and Government] 117 (1999)
Dotan, Y.Do the ‘Haves’ Still Come Out Ahead? Resource Inequalities in Ideological Courts: The Case of the Israeli High Court of Justice,” 33 Law & Soc’y Rev. 1059 (1999)
Dotan, Y.Government Lawyers as Adjudicators: Pre-petitions in the High Court of Justice Department 1990–1997,” 35 Isr. Law Rev. 453 (2003)
Dotan, Y. “Judicial Activism and Government Practices in Litigation in the Israeli High Court of Justice 1970–2000,” Paper presented at the Law and Society Association Annual Meeting, San Francisco June 2–5, 2011
Dotan, Y.Judicial Review and Political Accountability: The Case of the High Court of Justice in Israel”, 32 Isr. L. Rev. 448 (1998)
Dotan, Y.Judicial Rhetoric, Government Lawyers and Human Rights: The Case of the Israeli High Court of Justice during the Intifada,” 33 Law & Soc’y Rev. 319 (1999)
Dotan, Y.Non-Delegation and the Reformulation of Legality,” 42 Mishpatim [Law] 397 (2012) (Hebrew)
Dotan, Y. “‘Pre-petitions’ and Constitutional Dilemmas Regarding the Role of Government Lawyers,” 7 Mishpat Umimshal [Law and Government] 159 (2004) (Hebrew)
Dotan, Y.Public Lawyers and Private Clients: An Empirical Observation on the Relative Success Rates of Cause Lawyers,” 21 Law & Pol’y 401 (1999)
Dotan, Y.Ripeness and Politics in the High Court of Justice,” 20 Iunei Mishpat [Law Studies] 93 (1996) (Hebrew)
Dotan, Y.Should Prosecutorial Discretion Enjoy Special Treatment in Judicial Review? A Comparative Analysis of the Law in England and Israel,” Pub. L. 513 (1997)
Dotan, Y. and Hofnung, M.Interest Groups in the Israeli High Court of Justice: Measuring Success in Litigation and in Out-of-Court Settlements,” 23 Law & Pol’y 1 (2001)
Dotan, Y. and Hofnung, M.Legal Defeats – Political Wins: Why Do Elected Representatives Go to Court?,” 38 Comp. Pol. Stud. 75 (2005)
Easterbrook, F. H.Do Liberals and Conservatives Differ in Judicial Activism?,” 73 U. Colo. L. Rev. 1401 (2002)
Edelman, M.Courts, Politics and Culture in Israel (University of Virginia Press, 1994)
Edelman, M. “Israel,” in Neal, C. and Vallinder, T. (eds.), The Global Expansion of Judicial Power (New YorkUniversity Press, 1995)
Edelman, M.The Judicial Elite of Israel,” 13 Int’l Pol. Sci. Rev. 235 (1992)
Edwards, J. Ll. J. The Attorney General and the Public Interest (London: Sweet and Maxwell, 1984)
Einstein, J.Counsel for the United States: U.S. Attorney General in the Political and Legal System (Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1978)
Eisenberg, T., Fisher, T. and Rosen-Zvi, I.Israel’s Supreme Court Appellate Jurisdiction: An Empirical Study,” 96 Cornell L. Rev. 693 (2011)
Epp, C. R.The Rights Revolution (University of Chicago Press, 1998)
Epstein, L. and Kobylka, J. F.The Supreme Court and Legal Change: Abortion and the Death Penalty (Chapel Hill: North Carolina University Press, 1992)
Etinger, Y.More than 100,000 ultra-orthodox took part in protest against the rule of law,” Ha’Aretz June 18, 2010
Feeley, M. M. and Rubin, E. L.Judicial Policy Making and the Modern State: How the Courts Reformed America’s Prisons (Cambridge University Press, 1998)
Fiss, O. M.Foreword: The Forms of Justice,” 93 Harv. L. Rev. 1 (1979)
Fletcher, W. A.The Discretionary Constitution: Institutional Remedies and Judicial Legitimacy,” 91 Yale L.J. 635 (1982)
Frankel, M. E.The Search for Truth: An Umpireal View,” 123 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1031 (1975)
Freedman, M. H. Lawyers’ Ethics in an Adversary System (New York: The Bobbs-Merrill Company, Inc., 1975)
Fried, C.The Lawyer as Friend: The Moral Foundations of the Lawyer-Client Relation,” 85 Yale L.J. 1060 (1976)
Fuller, L. L. The Adversary System in Forum Lectures, Series 3, 1 (Washington, D.C.: Voice of America, 1961)
Fuller, L. and Randall, J. D.Professional Responsibility: Report of the Joint Conference,” 44 Am. Bar Ass’n. J. 1159 (1958)
Galanter, M.Why the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change,” 9 Law & Soc’y Rev. 95 (1974)
Galligan, D. J.Discretionary Powers: A Legal Study of Official Discretion (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986)
Gambitta, R. A. L., May, M. L. and Foster, J. C. (eds.), Governing Through Courts (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1981)
Gavison, R.Administrative Discretion in Law Enforcement (Jerusalem, 1991)
Gavison, R.Jewish and Democratic? A Rejoinder to the ‘Ethnic Democracy’ Debate,” 4 Isr. Stud. 44 (1999)
Gavison, R.The Attorney General: A Critical Examination of New Trends,” 5 Plilim [Israel Journal of Criminal Justice] 27 (1996) (Hebrew)
Gavison, R., Kremnitzer, M. and Dotan, Y.Judicial Activism at the High Court of Justice (Jerusalem: Magnes, 2000)
Ginsburg, T.Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases (Cambridge University Press, 2003)
Glikman, A.The Attorney General Freezes the Appointment of the Chief Commissioner,” Ynet, November 18, 2010
Gordon, R. “The Ideal and the Actual in the Law: Fantasies and Practices of New York City Lawyers, 1870–1910,” in Gawalt, G. W. (ed.), The New High Priests: Lawyers in Post-Civil War America (1984)
Graglia, L. A.Disaster by Decree: The Supreme Court Decisions on Race and the Schools (Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press, 1976)
Green, B. A.Must Government Lawyers ‘Seek Justice’ in Civil Litigation?9 Widener J. Pub. L. 235 (2000)
Grosman, G.Ulmert Calls for Investigation of the OAG for Obstruction of Justice,” Walla News June 23, 2011
Gutman, Y.A Storm in the G.S.S: The Attorney General Versus the Government (Tel-Aviv, 1995)
Gutman, Y.The Attorney General Versus The Government (Jerusalem: Edanim, 1981)
Handler, J. F.Down from Bureaucracy: The Ambiguity of Privatization and Empowerment (New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1996)
Harvey, J. R. III “Note, Loyalty in Government Litigation: Department of Justice Representation of Agency Clients,” 37 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1569 (1996)
Haynie, S. L.Resource Inequalities and Litigation Outcomes in the Philippine Supreme Court,” 56 J. Pol. 752 (1994)
Haynie, S. L. and Devore, J.Judging in an Unjust Regime: South Africa’s Appellate Division, 1950–1990,” 17 Am. Rev. Pol. 245 (1996)
Hazut, R.The Night on which the Supreme Court was Almost Conquered,” Yediot Acharonot, May 14, 1997
Herz, M. and Devins, N.The Consequences of DOJ Control of Litigation on Agencies’ Programs,” 52 Admin. L. Rev. 1345 (2000)
Hirschl, R.The Political Origins of Judicial Empowerment through Constitutionalization: Lessons from Four Constitutional Revolutions,” 25 Law & Soc. Inquiry 91 (2000)
Hirschl, R.Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004)
Hofnung, M. and Weinshall-Margel, K.Judicial Setbacks, Material Gains: Terror Litigation at the Israeli High Court of Justice,” 7 J. Empirical Legal Stud. 664 (2010)
Horowitz, D. L.The Courts and Social Policy (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 1977)
Horowitz, D. L.The Jurocracy: Government Lawyers, Agency Programs and Judicial Decisions (Washington, D.C.: Lexington Books, 1977)
Ilan, S.An Effort to Prevent Violence in the Ultra-orthodox and Secular Demonstrations in Jerusalem Today,” Ha’Aretz February 14, 1999
Ilan, S.Inflation of Bills: From Four to Average of 40 Bills for Each MK,” Ha’aretz October 30, 2000
Ilan, S.Rabbi David Yosef: ‘Antisemistic forces in the legal bureaucracy calls the Shas people parasites’,” Ha’aretz February 2, 1999
Ilan, S.Rabbi Ovadia Yosef: ‘The HCJ Justices Are Worse than Non-Jewish Courts and Should not Be Regarded as Judges of Israel’,” Ha’aretz, October 8, 1996
Ilan, S.Shas: Deri’s Conviction is the Conviction of Shas,” Ha’aretz March 18, 1999
Ilan, S., Alon, G. and Verter, Y.An Extreme Ultra-orthodox Attack on the HCJ: ‘Barak is the Enemy of the Jewish People’,” Ha’Aretz February 10, 1999
Ilan, S., Alon, G., Moalem, M. and Krao, N.Rabbi Yosef: The HCJ Justices are Villains and are the Cause of All the Suffering in the World,” Ha’Aretz February 11, 1999
Jacobsohn, G. J.Apple of Gold: Constitutionalism in Israel and the United States (Princeton University Press, 1993)
Kagan, R. A.Adversarial Legalism and American Government,” 10 J. Pol’y Analysis & Mgmt. 369 (1991)
Kagan, R. A.Adversarial Legalism: The American Way of Law (Harvard University Press, 2001)
Karp, J.Basic Law: Human Dignity and Liberty: A Biography of Power Struggles,” 1 Mishpat Umimshal [Law and Government] 323 (1993) (Hebrew)
Kedar, A.The Legal Transformation of Ethnic Geography: Israeli Law and the Palestinian Landholder 1948–1967,” 33 N.Y.U. J. Int’l L. & Pol. 923 (2001)
Kelly, J. B.Bureaucratic Activism and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms: The Department of Justice and Its Entry into the Centre of Government,” 42 Can. Pub. Admin. 476 (1999)
Kelly, J. B. “Canada: Legal Services and the Role of Government Lawyers” (Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Law and Society Association, Budapest, July 4–7, 2001)
Krebs, S.Lifting the Veil of Secrecy: Judicial Review of Administrative Detention in the Israeli Supreme Court,” 45 Vand. J. Transnat’l L. 639, 689 (2012)
Kmiec, K. D.The Origin and Current Meaning of ‘Judicial Activism’,” 92 Cal. L. Rev. 1441 (2004)
Kremnitzer, M. “The HCJ and Its Wide Concept of Its Role,” in Gavison, R., Kremnitzer, M., and Dotan, Y.Judicial Activism at the High Court of Justice (Jerusalem: Magnes, 2000)
Kretzmer, D.Judicial Review of Knesset Decisions,” 8 Tel Aviv U. Stud. L. 95 (1988)
Kretzmer, D. “The New Basic Laws on Human Rights: A Mini-revolution in Israeli Constitutional Law?,” in Zamir, I. and Zysblat, A. (eds.), Public Law in Israel (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996)
Kritzer, H. M. “The Government Gorilla: Why Does Government Come Out Ahead in Appellate Courts?,” in Kritzer, H. M. and Silbey, S. (eds.), In Litigation: Do the “Haves” Still Come Out Ahead? (Stanford University Press, 2003)
Kronman, A. T.The Lost Lawyer: Failing Ideals of the Legal Profession (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1993)
Lahav, P.Judgment in Jerusalem: Chief Justice Simon Agranat and the Zionist Century (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997)
Lanctot, C. J.The Duty of Zealous Advocacy and the Ethics of the Federal Government Lawyer: The Three Hardest Questions,” 64 S. Cal. L. Rev. 951 (1991)
Langevoort, D. C. and Rasmussen, R. K.Skewing the Results: The Role of Lawyers in Transmitting Legal Rules,” 5 S. Cal. Interdisc. L.J. 375 (1997)
Lawry, R. P.Who is the Client of the Federal Government Lawyer? An Analysis of the Wrong Question,” 37 Fed. B.J. 61 (1978)
Lemos, M. H.The Solicitor General as Mediator between Court and Agency,” 185 Mich. St. L. Rev. 2009
Levine, D. I.The Modification of Equitable Decrees in Institutional Reform Litigation: A Commentary on the Supreme Court’s Adoption of the Second Circuit’s Flexible Test,” 58 Brook. L. Rev. 1239 (1993)
Levit, N.Megacases, Diversity, and the Elusive Goal of Workplace Reform,” 49 B. C. L. Rev. 367 (2008)
Levontin, E. “Representation of the State in Court” (PhD dissertation, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 2009)
Levontin, E. and Gavison, R. “The ‘Binding’ Position of the Attorney General,” in Barak, A. (ed.), Shamgar Book, vol. I (2003)
Lewinbuk, K. P.Let’s Sue All the Lawyers: The Rise of Claims Against Lawyers for Aiding and Abetting a Client’s Breach of Fiduciary Duty,” 40 Ariz. St. L.J. 135 (2008)
Likhovski, A.The Invention of ‘Hebrew Law’ in Mandatory Palestine,” 46 Am. J. Comp. L. 339 (1998)
Linowitz, S. M. and Mayer, M.The Betrayed Profession: Lawyering at the End of the Twentieth Century (Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994)
Luban, D. “The Adversary System Excuse,” in Luban, D. (ed.) The Good Lawyer: Lawyers’ Roles and Lawyers’ Ethics (Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allenheld, 1983)
Macey, J. R. and Miller, G. P.Reflections on Professional Responsibility in a Regulatory State,” 63 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1105 (1995)
Magen, H. “Aharon Barak: We Shall Fight Like Lions against the Individual Survey on Judges,” Globs December 12, 2001
Magen, H.Changes in the New Proposal to Implement the Or Commission Report,” Globs November 22, 1998
Magen, H.The Bar Rejects the Central Part of Or Commission Report,” Globs September 9, 1997
Margalit, D.Rabin and Peres of the HCJ,” Ha’aretz December 9, 1994
Markus, Y.The Malice, Not the Stupidity,” Ha’aretz January 14, 1997
Marshall, W. P.Conservatives and the Seven Sins of Judicial Activism,” 73 U. Colo. L. Rev. 1217 (2002)
Mate, M. “Public Interest Litigation & The Transformation of the Supreme Court of India,” in Kapsizewski, D., Silverstein, G. and Kagan, R. A. (eds.), Consequential Courts: Judicial Roles in Global Perspective (Cambridge University Press, 2013)
Mautner, M.Law and Culture in Israel at the Threshold of the Twenty First Century (Tel Aviv: Am Oved, 2008)
Mautner, M.The Decline of Formalism and the Rise of Values in Israeli Law (Tel Aviv: Ma’agalei Deot, 1993)
McCann, M. W.Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization (University of Chicago Press, 1994)
McCann, M. and Silverstein, H. “Rethinking Law’s ‘Allurements’: A Relational Analysis of Social Movement Lawyers in the United States,” in Sarat, A. and Scheingold, S. A. (eds.), Cause Lawyering: Political Commitments and Professional Responsibilities (Oxford University Press, 1998)
McCormick, P.Party Capability Theory and Appellate Success in the Supreme Court of Canada 1949–1992,” 26 Can. J. Pol. Sci. 523 (1993)
Meir, A.As Nomadism Ends: The Israeli Bedouin of the Negev (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1997)
Mellinkoff, D.The Conscience of a Lawyer (St Paul, MN: West Publishing Company, 1973)
Mendel, O.On the Job of the Lawyer at the High Court of Justice Department,” 2 Ma’asei Mishpat [The Practice of Law] 53 (2009) (Hebrew)
Miller, G. P.Government Lawyers’ Ethics in a System of Checks and Balances,” 54 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1293 (1987)
Mishkin, P. J.Federal Courts as State Reformers,” 35 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 949 (1978)
Mizrachi, S.Dani Dankner to Face Indictment for Bribery and Fraud,” The Marker September 5, 2011
Moalem, M.A Wave of Intimidation against OAG Staff after the Ultra-orthodox Demonstration against the HCJ,” Ha’aretz February 17, 1999
Nagel, R. F.Separation of Powers and the Scope of Federal Equitable Remedies,” 30 Stan. L. Rev. 661 (1978)
Note, “Developments in the Law: Conflicts of Interest in the Legal Profession,” 94 Harv. L. Rev. 1244 (1981)
Note, “Government Counsel and their Obligations,” 121 Harv. L. Rev. 1409 (2008)
Note, “Rethinking the Professional Responsibilities of Federal Agency Lawyers,” 115 Harv. L. Rev. 1170 (2002)
Ogletree, C. J., Jr. and Sapir, Y.Keeping Gideon’s Promise: A Comparison of the American and Israeli Public Defender Experience,” 29 N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change 203 (2004)
Orgad, L. and Lavi, S.Judicial Guidance: Comments for Legislative Amendment in Supreme Court Decisions,” 34 Iunei Mishpat [Law Studies] 473 (2011) (Hebrew)
Pacelle, R. L., Jr. Between Law and Politics: The Solicitor General and the Structuring of Race, Gender and Reproductive Rights Litigation (Texas A&M University Press, 2003)
Parker, W.The Future of School Desegregation,” 94 Nw. U. L. Rev. 1157 (2000)
Paulsen, M. S.Who ‘Owns’ the Government’s Attorney-Client Privilege?,” 83 Minn. L. Rev. 473 (1998)
Perry, H. W., Jr. “United States Attorneys – Whom Shall They Serve?,” 61 Law & Contemp. Probs. 129 (1998)
Pierce, R. J.Two Problems in Administrative Law: Political Polarity on the District of Columbia Circuit and Judicial Deterrence of Agency Rulemaking,” Duke L.J. 300 (1988)
Polikoff, N. D.Am I My Client?: The Role Confusion of a Lawyer Activist,” 31 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 443 (1996)
Porsher, E.Now It Is Official: Chief Justice Beinish,” Ma’ariv-NRG September 7, 2006
Posner, R.Enlightened Despot,” The New Republic, April 2007 (Review of The Judge in a Democracy by Aharon Barak, 2006)
Postema, G. J.Moral Responsibility in Professional Ethics,” 55 N.Y. U. L. Rev. 63 (1980)
Provine, D. M.Case Selection in the United States Supreme Court (University of Chicago Press, 1980)
Reichman, A.A Very Narrow Bridge: Constitution, Justice, Equity and Remedy,” 37 Mishpatim [law] 701 (2007) (Hebrew)
Reinfeld, M.The Movement for the Quality of Government to HCJ: Order the Bar to Discharge Hoter Yishai,” Ha’aretz March 13, 1997
Roitman, Y. “The Public Lawyer and the Protection of Human Rights” (Lecture, 2004)
Roots, R.Unfair Federal Rules of Procedure: Why Does the Government Get More Time?33 Am. J. Trial Advoc. 493 (2010)
Rosenberg, G. N.The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change?, 2nd edn. (University of Chicago Press, 2008)
Rosen-Zvi, I.Taking Space Seriously: Law, Space and Society in Contempoary Israel (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004)
Rotem, M., Noach, H. and Al-Ukbi, N. The Arab-Bedouin in the Negev-Naqab Desert in Israel: Response to the Report of the State of Israel on Implementing the Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) (Shadow Report submitted by The Negev Coexistence Forum for Civil Equality, 2010)
Rubin, M. H.The Ethical Negotiator: Ethical Dilemmas, Unhappy Clients, and Angry Third Parties,” 26 Constr. Law. 12 (2006)
Rubinstein, A. and Medina, B.The Constitutional Law of Israel (Tel Aviv: Shoken, 2005)
Salokar, R. M. “Politics, Law, and the Office of the Solicitor General,” in Clayton, C. W. (ed.), Government Lawyers: The Federal Legal Bureaucracy and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kansas, 1995)
Salokar, R. M.The Solicitor General: The Politics of Law (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1992)
Sandler, R. and Schoenbrod, D.Democracy by Decree: What Happens When Courts Run Government (Yale University Press, 2003)
Sarat, A. and Scheingold, S. “Cause Lawyering and the Reproduction of Professional Authority,” in Sarat, A. and Scheingold, S. (eds.), Cause Lawyering: Political Commitments and Professional Responsibilities (Oxford University Press, 1998)
Scheingold, S.The Politics of Rights: Lawyers, Public Policy, and Political Change (New Haven CT: Yale University Press, 1974)
Schiff, Z. and Ya’ari, E.Intifada: The Palestinian Uprising – Israel’s Third Front (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1990)
Schlanger, M.Book Review: Beyond the Hero Judge: Institutional Reform Litigation as Litigation,” 97 Mich. L. Rev. 1994 (1999)
Schlanger, M.Civil Rights Injunctions over Time: A Case Study of Jail and Prison Court Orders,” 81 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 550 (2006)
Schnapper, E.Legal Ethics and the Government Lawyer,” 32 Rec. Ass’n. B. City N.Y 649 (1977)
Schuck, P. H.The Role of Judges in Settling Complex Cases: The Agent Orange Example,” 53 U. Chi. L. Rev. 337 (1986)
Segal, A.The Judgement of Edna Arbel [State Attorney] is Flawed,” Maariv April 4, 2001
Segal, J. A. and Spaeth, H. J.The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited (Cambridge University Press, 2002)
Segal, Z.Israeli Democracy (Tel Aviv: Ministry of Defense, 1990)
Shachar, Y., Haris, R. and Gross, M.Anatomy of Discourse and Division in the Supreme Court: Quantitative Analysis,” 20 Iunei Mishpat [Law Studies] 749 (1997) (Hebrew)
Shachar, Y., Haris, R. and Gross, M.Reference Patterns of the Supreme Court: A Quantitative Analysis,” 27 Mishpatim [Law] 119 (1996) (Hebrew)
Shadmi, H.The Government to Set Up Clinics for Bedouin: We Shall Build One Clinic,” Ha’aretz March 21, 2003
Shalev, C.Collective Punishment in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip (B’Tselem Report, November, 1990)
Shamgar, M.The Observance of International Law in the Administered Territories,” 1 Israeli Yearbook of Human Rights 262 (1971)
Shamir, R. “‘Landmark Cases’ and the Reproduction of Legitimacy: The Case of Israel’s High Court of Justice,” 24 Law & Soc’y Rev. 781 (1990)
Shamir, R.Suspended in Space: Bedouins under the Law of Israel,” 30 Law & Soc’y Rev. 231 (1996)
Shamir, R.The Politics of Reasonableness: Discretion as Judicial Power,” 5 Theory and Criticism 7 (1994)
Shapiro, M.Who Guards the Guardians?: Judicial Control of Administration (Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press, 1988)
Shavit, A.An Interview with Deri,” Ha’aretz July 20, 2000
Sheehan, R. S., Mishler, W. and Songer, D. S.Ideology, Status and Differential Success of Direct Parties Before the Supreme Court,” 86 Am. Pol. Sci. Rev. 464 (1992)
Shetreet, S.On Adjudication: Justice on Trial (Jerusalem: Yedioth Aharonot, 2004)
Shetreet, S.Reflections on the Protection of the Rights of the Individual: Form and Substance,” 12 Isr. L. Rev. 32 (1977)
Shetreet, S. “The Critical Challenge of Judicial Independence in Israel,” in Russel, P. and O’Brien, D. M. (eds.), Judicial Independence in the Age of Democracy: Critical Perspectives from around the World (2001)
Simon, W. H.The Ideology of Advocacy: Procedural Justice and Professional Ethics,” Wis. L. Rev. 29 (1978)
Solomon, R. C.Wearing Many Hats: Confidentiality and Conflicts of Interests Issues for the California Public Lawyer,” 25 Sw. U.L. Rev. 265 (1996)
Songer, D. R. and Sheehan, R. S.Who Wins on Appeal? Upperdogs and Underdogs in the United States Courts of Appeals,” 36 Am. J. Pol. Sci. 235 (1992)
Straschnov, A.Justice Under Fire (Tel Aviv: Yedioth Aharonot, 1994)
Strauss, D. A.The Solicitor General and the Interests of the United States,” 61 Law & Contemp. Probs. 165 (1998)
Strauss, P. L., Rakoff, T. D. and Farina, C. R.Gellhorn & Byse’s Administrative Law: Cases and Materials, 10 edn. (New York:Foundation Press, 2003)
Sunstein, C. R. Radicals in Robes (New York:Basic Books, 2005)
Supreme Court of Canada: Statistics 2001 to 2011
Symposium: Legal Ethics for Government Lawyers, 9(2) Widener J. Pub. L. 199 (2000)
Tate, C. N. and Valinder, T. (eds.), The Global Expansion of Judicial Power (New York University Press, 1995)
Tidmarsh, J. and Trangsrud, R. H.Complex Litigation and the Adversary System (New York:Foundation Press, 1998)
Trapolin, E. W.Sued into Submission: Judicial Creation of Standards in the Manufacture and Distribution of Lawful Products – The New Orleans Lawsuit Against Gun Manufacturers,” 46 Loy. L. Rev. 1275 (2000)
Ugarte, E. E.The Government Lawyer and the Common Good,” 40 S. Tex. L. Rev. 269 (1999)
United Kingdom Ministry of Justice, Judicial and Court Statistics 2010
Utz, P. J. “Two Models of Prosecutorial Professionalism,” in McDonald, W. F. (ed.), The Prosecutor (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1979)
Volcansek, M. L.Exporting the Missouri Plan: Judicial Appointment Commissions,” (in: “Symposium: The Fallacies and Fixables of Merit Selection and the Constituencies that Support Missouri Plan Reform”) 74 Mo. L. Rev. 783 (2009)
Wade, H. W. R. and Forsyth, C. F. Administrative Law, 10th edn. (Oxford University Press, 2009)
Wald, P. M. “‘For the United States’: Government Lawyers in Court,” 61 Law & Contemp. Probs. 107 (1998)
Wasserstrom, R.Lawyers as Professionals: Some Moral Issues,” 5 Hum. Rts. 1 (1975)
Weinshall-Margel, K.Attitudinal and Neo-Institutional Models of Supreme Court Decision Making: An Empirical and Comparative Perspective from Israel,” 8 J. Empirical Legal Stud. 556 (2011)
Wheeler, S., Cartwright, B., Kagan, R. A. and Friedman, L. M.Do the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead: Winning and Losing in State Supreme Courts, 1870–1970,” 21 Law & Soc’y Rev. 403 (1987)
Yashuvi, N. (ed.), Violations of Human Rights in the Occupied Territories 1990/1991 (Jerusalem:B’Tselem, 1991)
Yoaz, Y.The Labor Party: Friedman’s Proposal Will Cause Coalition Crisis,” Ha’Aretz November 16, 2007
Young, E. A.Judicial Activism and Conservative Politics,” 73 U. Colo. L. Rev. 1139 (2002)
Zamir, I.Adjudication in Administrative Cases (Jerusalem:The Harry Sacher Institution, 1975)
Zamir, I. “Administrative Law,” in Zamir, I. and Zysblat, A. (eds.), Public Law in Israel (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996)
Zamir, I. “Editor’s Note,” in Zamir, I. (ed.), The Klinghoffer Book on Public Law (Jerusalem, 1993)
Zamir, I.Evidence in the High Court of Justice,” 1 Mishpat Umimshal [Law and Government] 295 (1993) (Hebrew)
Zamir, I.Klinghoffer Book on Public Law (Jerusalem, 1993)
Zamir, I.Rule of Law and Civil Liberties in Israel,” 7 C. J. Q. 64, 65 (1988)
Zamir, I.Secondary Legislation: Procedures and Directives,” 11 Iunei Mishpat [Law Studies] 339 (1986) (Hebrew)
Zamir, I. “The Attorney General: A Public Servant, Not a Government Servant,” in Zamir, I. (ed.), The Klinghoffer Book on Public Law (Jerusalem, 1993)
Zamir, I. “The Lawyer in the Public Service,” in Dotan, Y. and Bendor, A. (eds.), Zamir Book: On Law, Government and Society (Jerusalem, 1995) (Hebrew)
Zamir, I. “The Role of the Attorney General in Times of Crisis: The Israeli Shin Bet Affair,” in Shetreet, S. (ed.), The Role of Courts in Society (Dordrecht: Nijhoff, 1988)
Zamir, I. “Unreasonableness as Ground of Review,” in Zamir, I. and Zysblat, A. (eds.), Public Law in Israel (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996)
Zarchin, T.This is how Noam Solberg’s Road is Paved to the Supreme Court,” Ha’aretz October 27, 2011
Zaring, D.National Rulemaking Through Trial Courts: The Big Case and Institutional Reform,” 51 UCLA L. Rev. 1015 (2004)
Zelikovitz, M.Ramon: The OAG Became Coercive,” Ynet June 12, 2008
Zer-Gutman, L.The Lawyer’s Duty not to Mislead the Court,” 24 Iunei Mishpat [Law Studies] 413 (2000) (Hebrew)
Zitrin, B. Z.Hoter Yishai: The Judicial System is Frozen and Very Conservative,” Ha’aretz February 25, 1997
Ziv, N.Symposium: The Legal Profession: Looking Backward: Combining Professionalism, Nation Building and Public Service: The Professional Project of the Israeli Bar 1928–2002,” 71 Fordham L. Rev. 1621 (2003)
Zysblat, A. “Introduction: The System of Government,” in Zamir, I. and Zysblat, A. (eds.), Public Law in Israel (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996)
Zysblat, A. “Protecting Fundamental Rights in Israel without a Written Constitution,” in Zamir, I. and Zysblat, A. (eds.), Public Law in Israel (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.