References

David Delaney

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511493690.016

Abbott, Jack Henry, 1982. In the Belly of the Beast. New York

Abramson, Paul, and Steven Pinkerton, 1995. With Pleasure: Thoughts on the Nature of Human Sexuality. Oxford

Adams, Carol, 1995. “Bestiality: The Unmentioned Abuse,” Animal Agenda 15: 29–31Google Scholar

Ajami, Fouad, 1996. “Why Bosnia Needs a Nuremberg,” US News and World Report, 19 February

Alford, C. Fred, 1997. What Evil Means to Us. Ithaca, NY

Allen, Anita, 1990. “Surrogacy, Slavery, and the Ownership of Life,” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 13 139–149Google Scholar PubMed

Andrews, Lori, 1990. “Surrogate Motherhood: The Challenge for Feminists,” in Larry Gostin (ed.), Surrogate Motherhood: Politics and Privacy. Bloomington, IN: 167–182

Andriette, Bill, 1999. “Laying with Beasts,” The Guide, January (www. guidemag.com), 1

Angier, Natalie, 1995. The Beauty of the Beastly: New Views on the Nature of Life. New York

Animal Sexual Abuse Information and Resources (www.asairs.com/zoo summary.htm)

Annas, George, 1990. “Fairy Tales Surrogate Mothers Tell,” in Larry Gostin (ed.), Surrogate Motherhood: Politics and Privacy. Bloomington, IN: 43–58

Aplet, Gregory, 1999. “On the Nature of Wildness: Exploring What Wilderness Protects,” Denver University Law Review 76: 347–367Google Scholar

Appy, Christian, 1993. Working Class War: American Combat Soldiers in Vietnam. Chapel Hill, NC

Arluke, Arnold and Clinton Sanders, 1996. Regarding Animals. Philadelphia

Aronowitz, Stanley, 1988. Science as Power: Discourse and Ideology in Modern Science. Minneapolis, MN

Baker, C. Edwin, 1986. “Property and its Relation to Constitutionally Protected Liberty,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 134: 741–816CrossRef Google Scholar

Baker, Lynne Rudder, 1987. Saving Belief: A Critique of Physicalism. Princeton, NJ

Baker, Nicola, 1996. “Let's Talk about our Relationships,” New Statesman, 20 September, 12

Barnard, Neal, and Steven, Kaufman, 1997. “Animal Research is Wasteful and Misleading,” Scientific American 2: 80–82CrossRef Google Scholar

Barrett, Robert, 1998. “The ‘Schizophrenic’ and the Liminal Persona in Modern Society,” Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry 22: 465–494CrossRef Google Scholar

Barrow, John, 1991. Theories of Everything. Oxford

Bazelon, David, 1969. “Implementing the Right to Treatment,” University of Chicago Law Review 36: 742–754CrossRef Google Scholar

Becker, Ernst, 1973. The Denial of Death. New York

Berg, Barbara, 1995. “Listening to the Voices of the Infertile,” in Joan Callahan (ed.), Reproduction, Ethics and the Law: Feminist Perspectives. Bloomington IN: 80–108

Berlin, Isaiah, 1965/1999. The Roots of Romanticism. Princeton, NJ

Bierne, Piers, 1997. “Rethinking Bestiality: Towards a Concept of Interspecies Sexual Assault,” Theoretical Criminology 1: 317–340CrossRef Google Scholar

Binder, Denis, 1996. “Act of God? or Act of Man: A Reappraisal of the Act of God Defense in Tort,” Review of Litigation 15: 1–79Google Scholar

Birch, Thomas, 1990. “The Incarceration of Wildness: Wilderness Areas as Prisons,” Environmental Ethics 12: 3–26CrossRef Google Scholar

Bitz, D. Michael, and Jean, Bitz, 1999. “Incompetence and the Brain Injured Individual,” St. Thomas Law Review 12: 205–276Google Scholar

Blecker, Robert, 1990. “Haven or Hell: Inside Lorton Central Prison,” Stanford Law Review 42: 1149–1249CrossRef Google Scholar

Blum, Deborah, 1994. The Monkey Wars. Oxford

Bogert, Laurence, 1994. “That's My Story and I'm Stickin' to it: Is ‘the Best Available’ Science Any Available Science under the Endangered Species Act?” Idaho Law Review 31: 85–150Google Scholar

Bookchin, Murray, 1986. The Modern Crisis. Philadelphia

Borges, Ellen, 1995. “A Social Critique of Biological Psychiatry,” in Colin Ross and Alvin Pam (eds.), Pseudoscience in Biological Psychiatry: Blaming the Body. New York: 211–240

Boswell, John, 1980. Christianity, Social Tolerance and Homosexuality. Chicago

Botting, Jack, and Adrian, Morrison, 1997. “Animal Research is Vital to Medicine,” Scientific American 2: 83–85CrossRef Google Scholar

Boyle, James, 1991. “Is Subjectivity Possible? The Post-Modern Subject in Legal Theory,” University of Colorado Law Review 62: 489–524Google Scholar

Bransford, Helen, 1995. “Surrogacy: A Mother's Story,” Vogue, July, 134

Brown, Bill, 2001. “Thing Theory,” Critical Inquiry 28: 1–22CrossRef Google Scholar

Burton, Steven, 1992. Judging in Good Faith. Cambridge

Button, Lori, 1989. “Postpartum Psychosis: The Birth of a New Defense,” Cooley Law Review 6: 323–344Google Scholar

Cahoone, Lawrence, 1988. The Dilemma of Modernity: Philosophy, Culture and Anti-Culture.Albany, NY

Callicott, J. Baird, 1998. “That Good Old-Time Wilderness Religion,” in J. Baird Callicott and Michael Nelson (eds.), The Great New Wilderness Debate. Athens, GA: 387–394

Callicott, J. Baird, and Michael Nelson (eds.), The Great New Wilderness Debate. Athens, GA

Cardozo, Benjamin, 1921. The Nature of the Judicial Process. New Haven

Carhart, Arthur, 1961. Planning for America's Wildlands. Harrisburg, PA

Carney, Robert, and Williams, Brian, 1983. “Note – Criminal Law: Premenstrual Syndrome – a Criminal Defense,” Notre Dame Law Review 59: 253–269Google Scholar

Castree, Noel, and Bruce Braun, 2001. Social Nature: Theory, Practice, and Politics. Malden, MA

Charo, R. Alta, 1994. “And Baby Makes Three – or Four, or Five, or Six: Defining Family after the Genetic Revolution,” in M. Frankel and A. Teich (eds.), The Genetic Frontier: Ethics, Law and Policy. Washington: 25–44

Charo, R. Alta, and Karen Rothenberg, 1994. “‘The Good Mother’: The Limits of Reproductive Accountability and Genetic Choice,” in Karen Rothenberg and E. Thomson (eds.), Women and Prenatal Testing: Facing the Challenges of Genetic Technology. Columbus, OH: 105–130

Charvet, John, 1999. “Rousseau, the Problem of Sovereignty and the Limits of Political Obligation,” in Christopher Morris (ed.), Social Contract Theorists. Lanham, MD: 205–218

Cheah, Pheng, and Elizabeth Grosz, 1996. “The Body of the Law: Notes toward a Theory of Corporeal Justice,” in David Fraser and Judith Grbich (eds.), Thinking through the Body of the Law. New York: 3–25

Chesler, Phyllis, 1988. The Sacred Bond. New York

Cichon, Dennis, 1992. “The Right to ‘Just Say No’: A History and Analysis of the Right to Refuse Antipsychotic Drugs,” Louisiana Law Review 53: 283–426Google Scholar

Clayton, Ellen, 1994. “What the Law Says about Reproductive Genetic Testing and What it Doesn't,” in Karen Rothenberg and E. Thomson (eds.), Women and Prenatal Testing: Facing the Challenges of Genetic Technology. Columbus, OH: 131–161

Coffey, Maureen, 1993. “The Genetic Defense: Excuse or Explanation?” William and Mary Law Review 35: 353–399Google Scholar

Cohen, Felix, 1935. “Transcendental Nonsense and the Functional Approach,” Columbia Law Review 35: 809–849CrossRef Google Scholar

Coke, Edward, 1628/1979. First Part of the Institutes of the Laws of England. New York

Collingwood, R. G., 1945. The Idea of Nature. Oxford

Colson, Charles, 1993. “Society Must Cultivate Man's Innate Moral Sense,” Insight on the News, 17 November

Cook-Deegan, Robert, 1994. The Gene Wars: Science, Politics, and the Human Genome. New York

Cooper, David E., 1990. Existentialism. Oxford

Corea, Gena, 1985. The Mother Machine: Reproductive Technologies from Artificial Insemination to Artificial Wombs. New York

Cover, Robert, 1986. “Violence and the Word,” Yale Law Journal 95: 1601–1630CrossRef Google Scholar

Cronon, William, 1995. “The Trouble with Wilderness; or, Getting Back to the Wrong Nature,” in Cronon (ed.), Uncommon Ground: Toward Reinventing Nature. New York: 69–90

Csordas, Thomas, 1994. “Introduction: The Body as Representation and Being-in-the-World,” in Thomas Csordas (ed.), Embodiment and Experience: The Existential Ground of Culture and Self. Cambridge: 1–27

Dallmayr, Fred, 1981. Twilight of Subjectivity: Contributions to a Post-Individualist Theory of Politics. Amherst, MA

Dan-Cohen, Meir, 1992. “Responsibility and the Boundaries of the Self,” Harvard Law Review 105: 959–1004CrossRef Google Scholar

Daston, Lorraine, 1998. “Objectivity and the Escape from Perspective,” in Mario Biagioli (ed.), The Science Studies Reader. New York: 110–123

Davies, Margaret, 1994. Asking the Law Question. London

Davies, Margaret, 1996. Delimiting the Law: “Postmodernism” and the Politics of Law. London

Davies, Paul, 1998. “What are the Laws of Nature?” in John Brockman (ed.), Doing Science: The Reality Club. New York: 45–72

Dekkers, Midas, 1994. Dearest Pet: On Bestiality. London

Dennett, Daniel, 1984. Elbow Room: The Varieties of Free Will Worth Having. Cambridge, MA

Dolgin, Janet, 1993. “Just a Gene: Judicial Assumptions about Parenthood,” UCLA Law Review 40: 637–694Google Scholar PubMed

Donovan, Josephine, 1996. “Animal Rights and Feminist Theory,” in Josephine Donovan and Carol Adams (eds.), Beyond Animal Rights: A Feminist Caring Ethic for the Treatment of Animals. New York: 34–59

Douglas, William O., 1965. A Wilderness Bill of Rights. Boston

Doyle, Richard, 1997. On Beyond Living: Rhetorical Transformations of the Life Sciences. Stanford, CA

Dresser, Rebecca, 1991. “Making up our Minds: Can Law Survive Cognitive Science?” Criminal Justice Ethics 6: 27–40CrossRef Google Scholar

Dressler, Joshua, 1998. “Reflections on Excusing Wrongdoers,” Rutgers Law Journal 19: 671–709Google Scholar

Dressler, Joshua, 1994. Cases and Materials on Criminal Law. St. Paul, MN

Dreyfuss, Rochelle Cooper, and Nelkin, Dorothy, 1992. “The Jurisprudence of Genetics,” Vanderbilt Law Review 45: 313–348Google Scholar PubMed

Duxbury, Neil, 1995. Patterns of American Jurisprudence. Oxford

Dyn, Barry, and Michael Glenn, 1993. “Forecast for Couples,” Psychology Today, July

Edmundson, William, 1993. “Transparency and Indeterminacy in the Critique of Critical Legal Studies,” Seton Hall Law Review 24: 557–602Google Scholar

Ehrlich, Paul, 1986. The Machinery of Nature. New York

Elias, Norbert, 1939/1982. The Civilizing Process. Oxford

Elliot, Robert, 1982. “Faking Nature,” Inquiry 25: 81–94CrossRef Google Scholar

EquAdept, “The Essence of Zoophilia” (http://home.worldonline.dk/horsies)

Eskridge, William, 1999. Gaylaw. Cambridge, MA

Faulstich, Paul, 1994. “The Cultured Wild and the Limits of Wilderness,” in David Burks (ed.), The Place of the Wild. Washington: 161–174

Feldman, Stephen, 2000. American Legal Thought from Premodernism to Postmodernism. New York

Fingarette, Herbert, 1972. The Meaning of Criminal Insanity. Berkeley

Flanagan, Dennis, 1988. Flanagan's Version. New York

Floyd, Jami, 1990. “The Administration of Psychotropic Drugs to Prisoners: State of the Law and Beyond,” California Law Review 78: 1243–1285CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Foreman, Dave, 1994. “Where Man is a Visitor,” in David Burks (ed.), The Place of the Wild. Washington: 225–235

Foucault, Michel, 1965. Madness and Civilization. New York

Foucault, Michel, 1978. The History of Sexuality. New York

Francione, Gary, 1995. Animals, Property and the Law. Philadelphia

Foucault, Michel, 1996. Rain without Thunder: The Ideology of the Animal Rights Movement. Philadelphia

Frank, Jerome, 1949. Courts on Trial. Princeton

Franklin, Sarah, 1997. Embodied Progress: A Cultural Account of Assisted Conception. London

Fraser, Caroline, 1993. “The Raid at Silver Spring,” New Yorker, 19 April, 66Google Scholar

Freud, Sigmund, 1930/1962. Civilization and its Discontents. New York

Freyfogle, Eric, 1994. “The Ethical Strands of Environmental Law,” University of Illinois Law Review 1994: 819–846Google Scholar

Fuller, Steven, 1996. “Does Science Put an End to History, or History to Science? Or, Why Being Pro-Science is Harder than you Think,” in Andrew Ross (ed.), Science Wars. Durham, NC: 29–60

Fuss, Diana, 1989. Essentially Speaking: Feminism, Nature and Difference. New York

Garber, Marjorie, 1996. Dog Love. New York

Gelman, Sheldon, 1995. “The Biological Alteration Cases,” William and Mary Law Review 36: 1203–1301Google Scholar PubMed

Gelman, Sheldon, 1999. Medicating Schizophrenia. New Brunswick, NJ

George, Robert, 1992. “Natural Law and Human Nature,” in Robert George (ed.), Natural Law Theory: Contemporary Essays. Oxford: 31–41

Gerety, Tom, 1997. “Redefining Privacy,” Harvard Civil Rights – Civil Liberties Law Review 12: 233–296Google Scholar

Gilbert, Walter, 1992. “A Vision of the Grail,” in Daniel Kevles and Leroy Hood (eds.), The Code of Codes: Scientific and Social Issues in the Human Genome Project. Cambridge, MA: 83–97

Gilman, Owen, 1992. Vietnam and the Southern Imagination. Jackson, MS

Gladwell, Malcolm, 1997. “Damaged,” New Yorker, 24 February, 132Google Scholar

Goldstein, Abraham, 1967. The Insanity Defense. New Haven

Graves-Brown, Paul, 2000. “Introduction,” in Paul Graves-Brown (ed.), Matter, Materiality and Modern Culture. London: 1–9

Greenawalt, Kent, 1992. Law and Objectivity. Cambridge, MA

Griffin, David Ray, 1988. “Introduction,” in David Griffin (ed.), The Reenchantment of Science. Albany: 1–46

Gross, Paul, 1994. Higher Superstition: The Academic Left and its Quarrels with Science. New York

Grosz, Elizabeth, 1994. Volatile Bodies: Toward a Corporeal Feminism. Bloomington, IN

Gruchow, Paul, 1997. The Boundary Waters: The Grace of the Wild. Minneapolis, MN

Guthiel, Thomas, 1980. “In Search of True Freedom: Drug Refusal, Involuntary Medication, and ‘Rotting with your Rights on’,” American Journal of Psychiatry 137: 327–328Google Scholar

Guthiel, T., and Appelbaum, P., 1983. “‘Mind Control’, ‘Synthetic Sanity’, ‘Artificial Competence’ and General Confusion: Legally Relevant Effects of Antipsychotic Medication,” Hofstra Law Review 12: 77–120Google Scholar

Hacking, Ian, 1999. The Social Construction of What? Cambridge, MA

Halewood, Peter, 1996. “Law's Bodies: Disembodiment and the Structure of Liberal Property Rights,” Iowa Law Review 81: 1331–1393Google Scholar

Ham, Jennifer, and Mathew Senior (eds.), 1997. Animal Acts: Configuring the Human in Western History. London

Hanson, F. Allan, 1996. “Suits for Wrongful Life, Counterfactuals and the Nonexistence Problem,” Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal 5: 1–24Google Scholar

Haraway, Donna, 1991. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York

Harding, Sandra, 1996. “Science is ‘Good to Think with’,” in Andrew Ross (ed.), Science Wars. Durham, NC: 16–28

Hart, H. L. A., 1968. Punishment and Responsibility. Cambridge, MA

Hayles, N. Katherine, 1996. “Consolidating the Canon,” in Andrew Ross (ed.), Science Wars. Durham, NC: 226–237

Healy, David, 2002. The Creation of Psychopharmacology. Cambridge, MA

Hearne, Vicki, 1986. Adam's Task: Calling Animals by Name. New York

Hegert, James, 1990. American Jurisprudence 1870–1970. Houston

Heller, Agnes, 1988. General Ethics. Oxford

Henifin, Mary Sue, Ruth Hubbard, and Judy Norsigian, 1989. “Prenatal Screening,” in Sherrill Cohen and Nadine Taub (eds.), Reproductive Laws for the 1990s. Clifton, NJ: 155–183

Hill, John Lawrence, 1997. “Law and the Concept of the Core Self: Toward a Reconciliation of Naturalism and Humanism,” Marquette Law Review 80: 289–390Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas, 1650/1994. The Elements of Law. Oxford

Hill, John Lawrence, 1651/1994. Leviathan. Indianapolis

Holmes, Oliver Wendell, 1881. The Common Law. Boston

Horan, Susan, 1992. “The XYY Supermale and the Criminal Justice System: A Square Peg in a Round Hole,” Loyola Los Angeles Law Review 25: 1343–1376Google Scholar

Horgan, John, 1999. The Undiscovered Mind: How the Human Brain Defies Replication, Medication and Explanation. New York

Hosp, Christina, 1991. “Has the PMS Defense Gained a Legitimate Foothold in Virginia Criminal Law?” George Mason Law Review 14: 427–446Google Scholar

Houck, Oliver, 1995. “Reflections on the Endangered Species Act,” Environmental Law 25: 689–702Google Scholar

Hubbard, Ruth, and Elijah Wald, 1993. Exploding the Gene Myth. Boston

Hyde, Alan, 1997. Bodies of Law. Princeton

Jeffery, C. Ray, 1992. “The Brain, the Law and the Medicalization of Crime,” in Roger Masters and Michael McGuire (eds.), The Neurotransmitter Revolution: Serotonin, Social Behavior and the Law.Carbondale, IL: 161–178

Johnston, David, 1986. The Rhetoric of Leviathan. Princeton

Jordan, Mark, 1997. The Invention of Sodomy in Christian Theology. Chicago

Julien, Robert, 1996. A Primer of Drug Action: A Concise, Nontechnical Guide to the Actions, Uses and Side Effects of Pyschoactive Drugs, 8th ed. New York

Kadish, Sanford, 1987. “Excusing Crime,” California Law Review 75: 257–290CrossRef Google Scholar

Kay, Lily, 2000. “The Book of Life? How a Genetic Code Became a Language,” in Phillip Sloan (ed.), Controlling Our Destinies. Notre Dame, IN: 99–124

Keller, Evelyn Fox, 1992. “Nature, Nurture and the Human Genome Project,” in Daniel Kevles and Leroy Hood (eds.), The Code of Codes: Scientific and Social Issues in the Human Genome Project. Cambridge, MA: 281–299

Keller, Evelyn Fox, 1995. Refiguring Life. New York

Kelley, Donald, 1990. The Human Measure: Social Thought in the Western Legal Tradition. Cambridge, MA

Kelsen, Hans, 1945. General Theory of Law and the State. Cambridge, MA

Kennedy, J. S., 1992. The New Anthropomorphism. Cambridge

Kennedy, Walter, 1941. “My Philosophy of Law,” in My Philosophy of Law: Credos of 16 American Legal Scholars. Boston: 147–160

Kevles, Daniel, 1992. “Out of Eugenics: The Historical Politics of the Human Genome,” in Daniel Kevles and Leroy Hood (eds.), The Code of Codes: Scientific and Social Issues in the Human Genome Project. Cambridge, MA: 3–36

Kevles, Daniel, and Leroy Hood (eds.), 1992. The Code of Codes: Scientific and Social Issues in the Human Genome Project. Cambridge, MA

Kilbourne, James, 1991. “The Endangered Species Act under the Microscope: A Closeup Look from a Litigator's Perspective,” Environmental Law 21: 499–585Google Scholar

King, Martin Luther Jr., 1963. Letter from the Birmingham City Jail. Philadelphia

Kirmayer, Laurence, 1992. “The Body's Insistence on Meaning: Metaphor as Presentation and Representation in Illness Experience,” Medical Anthropology Quarterly 6: 323–346CrossRef Google Scholar

Kirwin, Barbara, 1997. The Mad, The Bad and the Innocent: The Criminal Mind on Trial. Boston

Kitcher, Philip, 2000. “Utopian Genetics and Social Inequality,” in Phillip Sloan (ed.), Controlling Our Destinies. Notre Dame, IN: 229–264

Klaver, Irene, 1995. “Silent Wolves: The Howl of the Implicit,” in David Rothenberg (ed.), Wild Ideas. Minneapolis: 117–132

Klein, Richard, 1995. “The Power of Pets,” New Republic, 10 July, 18–23Google Scholar

Klinenberg, Eric, 2002. Heat Wave: A Social Autopsy of Disaster in Chicago. Chicago

Krafft-Ebing, Richard von, 1924. Psychopathia Sexualis. New York

Kuhn, Thomas, 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago

Lakoff, George, 1987. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind.Chicago

Langdell, Christopher, 1879. Selection of Cases on the Law of Contracts, 2nd ed. Boston

Latour, Bruno, 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA

Latour, Bruno, and Steve Woolgar, 1986. Laboratory Life. Princeton

Law, John, 1994. Organizing Modernity. Oxford

Law, John, and Mol, Annemarie, 1995. “Notes on Materiality and Sociality,” Sociological Review 43: 274–294CrossRef Google Scholar

Laycock, Steven, 1999. “The Animal as Animal: A Plea for Open Conceptuality,” in H. Peter Steeves (ed.), Animal Others: On Ethics, Ontology and Animal Life. Albany: 271–284

Leder, Drew, 1990. The Absent Body. Chicago

Leiss, William, 1972. The Domination of Nature. New York

Lelling, Andrew, 1993. “Eliminative Materialism, Neuroscience and the Criminal Law,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 141: 1471–1564CrossRef Google Scholar

Lessnoff, Michael, 1986. Social Contract. Atlantic Highlands, NJ

Lévi-Strauss, Claude, 1985. The View from Afar. New York

Lewis, Dorothy, 1998. Guilty by Reason of Insanity. New York

Libby, Ronald, 1998. Eco-Wars: Political Campaigns and Social Movements. New York

Lieberman, Jethro, 1999. A Practical Companion to the Constitution. Berkeley

Light, Andrew, 1995. “Urban Wilderness,” in David Rothenberg (ed.), Wild Ideas. Minneapolis: 195–212

Lightman, Alan, 1996. Dance for Two. New York

Liliequist, Jonas, 1992. “Peasants Against Nature: Crossing the Boundaries between Man and Animals in 17th and 18th Century Sweden,” in John Fout (ed.), Forbidden History. Chicago: 57–88

Lindberg, David, 1992. The Beginnings of Western Science. Oxford

Linzey, Andrew, 2000. “On Zoophilia,” Animal Agenda 20: 29Google Scholar

Lippman, Abby, 1991. “Prenatal Genetic Testing and Screening: Constructing Needs and Reinforcing Inequalities,” American Journal of Law and Medicine 17: 15–49Google Scholar

Lippman, Abby, 1994. “The Genetic Construction of Prenatal Testing: Choice, Consent or Conformity for Women,” in Karen Rothenberg and E. Thomson (eds.), Women and Prenatal Testing: Facing the Challenges of Genetic Technology. Columbus, OH: 9–34

Llewellyn, Karl, 1931. “Some Realism about Realism – Responding to Dean Pound,” Harvard Law Review 44: 1222–1256CrossRef Google Scholar

Llewellyn, Karl, 1960. The Common Law Tradition: Deciding Appeals. Boston

Lock, Margaret, 1993. “Cultivating the Body: Anthropology and Epistemologies of Bodily Practice and Knowledge,” Annual Review of Anthropology 22: 133–155CrossRef Google Scholar

Locke, John, 1690/1980. Second Treatise on Government. Indianapolis

McKibben, Bill, 1989. The End of Nature. New York

Macklin, Ruth, 1990. “Is There Anything Wrong with Surrogate Motherhood? An Ethical Analysis,” in Larry Gostin (ed.), Surrogate Motherhood: Politics and Privacy. Bloomington, IN: 136–150

McPhee, John, 1989. The Control of Nature. New York

Mahoney, Joan, 1990. “An Essay on Surrogacy and Feminist Thought,” in Larry Gostin (ed.), Surrogate Motherhood: Politics and Privacy. Bloomington, IN: 181–197

Mann, Charles, and Mark Plummer, 1995. Noah's Choice: The Future of Endangered Species. New York

Mann, Joe, 1999. “Making Sense of the Endangered Species Act: A Human Centered Justification,” New York University Environmental Law Journal 7: 246–304Google Scholar

Mannix, Brian, 1992. “The Endangered Species Act and the Descent of Man (with apologies to Mr. Darwin),” The American Enterprise, 12 November, 56–63

Marcuse, Herbert, 1966. Eros and Civilization. Boston

Marks, Jonathan, 2002. What it Means to be 98% Chimpanzee. Berkeley

Martin, Emily, 1987. The Women in the Body: A Cultural Analysis of Reproduction. Boston

Masson, Jeffery Moussaieff, 1995. When Elephants Weep: The Emotional Lives of Animals. New York

Masson, Jeffery Moussaieff, 1997. Dogs Never Lie about Love: Reflections on the Emotional World of Dogs. New York

Mathews, Mark, 1994. The Horseman: Obsessions of a Zoophile. Amherst, NY

Mead, Margaret, 1983. Foreword, in Thomas Rhys Williams, Socialization. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: v–viii

Mele, Alfred, 1995. Autonomous Agents: From Self-Control to Autonomy. New York

Merchant, Caroline, 1989. The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology and the Scientific Revolution. San Francisco

Meyer, Linda Ross, 1998. “Is Practical Reason Mindless?” Georgetown Law Journal 86: 647–675Google Scholar

Meyer, Michel, 2000. Philosophy and the Passions: Toward a History of Human Nature. University Park, PA

Midgley, Mary, 1978. Beast and Man: The Roots of Human Nature. Ithaca, NY

Midgley, Mary, 1984. Animals and Why They Matter. Athens, GA

Mill, John Stuart, 1874/1923. Nature, the Utility of Religion and Theism. London

Miller, William, 1997. The Anatomy of Disgust. Cambridge, MA

Modrow, John, 1992. How to Become a Schizophrenic: The Case against Biological Psychiatry. Everett, WA

Money, John, 1986. Lovemaps. Buffalo

Moore, Michael, 1985. “Causation and the Excuses,” California Law Review 73: 1091–1148CrossRef Google Scholar

Moran, Leslie, 1996. The Homosexual(ity) of Law. London

Morriss, Peter, 1997. “Blurred Boundaries,” Inquiry 40: 259–290CrossRef Google Scholar

Morse, Stephen, 1994. “Culpability and Control,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 142: 1587–1660CrossRef Google Scholar

Morse, Stephen, 1996. “Brain and Blame,” Georgetown Law Review 84: 527–549Google Scholar

Morse, Stephen, 1999. “Crazy Reasons,” Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues 10: 189–226Google Scholar

Murphy, Lawrence, 1990. “Defining the Crime against Nature: Sodomy in the United States Appeals Courts, 1810–1940,” Journal of Homosexuality 19: 49–66CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Nash, Roderick, 1982. Wilderness and the American Mind. New Haven

Nash, Roderick, 1989. The Rights of Nature: A History of Environmental Ethics. Madison, WI

Nedelsky, Jennifer, 1990. “Law, Boundaries and the Bounded Self,” Representations 30: 162–189CrossRef Google Scholar

Nelkin, Dorothy, 1992. “The Social Power of Genetic Information,” in Daniel Kevles and Leroy Hood (eds.), The Code of Codes: Scientific and Social Issues in the Human Genome Project. Cambridge, MA: 177–190

Nelkin, Dorothy, 1996. “The Science Wars: Responses to a Failed Marriage,” in Andrew Ross (ed.), Science Wars. Durham, NC: 114–122

Nelkin, Dorothy, and M. Susan Lindee, 1995. The DNA Mystique: The Gene as a Cultural Icon. New York

Nelkin, Dorothy, and Laurence Tancredi, 1989. Dangerous Diagnostics: The Social Power of Biological Information. New York

Nelson, Michael P., 1998. “An Amalgamation of Wilderness Preservation Arguments,” in J. Baird Callicott and Michael Nelson (eds.), The Great New Wilderness Debate. Athens, GA: 154–198

Neu, Jerome, 2000. A Tear is an Intellectual Thing: The Meanings of Emotions. New York

Noske, Barbara, 1997. Beyond Boundaries: Humans and Animals. Montreal

Nussbaum, Martha, 1999. “‘Secret Sewers of Vice’: Disgust, Bodies and the Law,” in Susan Bandes (ed.), The Passions of Law. New York: 19–62

Oelschlaeger, Max, 1991. The Idea of Wilderness from Prehistory to the Age of Ecology. New Haven

Nussbaum, Martha, 1992. “Wilderness, Civilization and Language,” in Max Oelschlaeger (ed.), The Wilderness Condition: Essays in Environment and Civilization. San Francisco: 271–308

O'Neill, John, 1985. Five Bodies: The Human Shape of Modern Society. Ithaca, NY

Opton, Gary, 1974. “Psychiatric Violence against Prisoners: When Therapy is Punishment,” Mississippi Law Review 45: 605–644Google Scholar PubMed

Overall, Christine, 1987. Ethics and Human Reproduction: A Feminist Analysis. Boston

Pam, Alvin, 1995. “Introduction,” in Colin Ross and Alvin Pam (eds.), Pseudoscience in Biological Psychiatry: Blaming the Body. New York: 1–6

Paul, Diane, 1995. Controlling Human Heredity: 1865 to the Present. Atlantic Highlands, NJ

Peller, Gary, 1985. “The Metaphysics of American Law,” California Law Review 73: 1151–1290CrossRef Google Scholar

Perlin, Michael, 1994. The Jurisprudence of the Insanity Defense. Durham, NC

Perrine, Daniel, 1996. The Chemistry of Mind-Altering Drugs. Washington

Pfeffer, Naomi, 1987. “Artificial Insemination, In-Vitro Fertilization and the Stigma of Infertility,” in Michelle Stanworth (ed.), Reproductive Technologies: Gender, Motherhood and Medicine. Minneapolis: 81–97

Posner, Richard, and K. Silbaugh, 1994. A Guide to America's Sex Laws. Chicago

Pound, Roscoe, 1908. “Mechanical Jurisprudence,” Columbia Law Review 8: 605–623CrossRef Google Scholar

Pound, Roscoe, 1931. “A Call for a Realist Jurisprudence,” Harvard Law Review 44: 697–711CrossRef Google Scholar

Powell, John, 1997. “The Multiple Self: Exploring between and beyond Modernity and Postmodernity,” Minnesota Law Review 81: 1481–1520Google Scholar

Price-Huish, Cecilee, 1997. “‘Born to Kill?’ Aggression Genes and their Potential Impact on Sentencing and the Criminal Justice System,” Southern Methodist University Law Review 50: 603–626Google Scholar

Rapp, Rayna, 1988. “The Power of ‘Positive’ Diagnosis: Medical and Maternal Discourses on Amniocentesis,” in Karen Michaelson (ed.), Childbirth in America. South Hadley, MA: 103–116

Redding, Richard, 1999. “Reconstructing Science through Law,” Southern Illinois University Law Journal 23: 585–610Google Scholar

Regan, Pamela, and Ellen Berscheid, 1999. Lust: What We Know about Human Desire. Thousand Oaks, CA

Reider, Laura, 1998. “Toward a New Test for the Insanity Defense: Incorporating the Discoveries of Neuroscience into Moral and Legal Theories,” UCLA Law Review 46: 289–340Google Scholar

Ricklefs, Robert, 1973. Ecology. Newton, MA

Robinson, Daniel, 1996. Wild Beasts and Idle Humours: The Insanity Defense from Antiquity to the Present. Cambridge, MA

Rojek, Chris, 1993. Ways of Escape: Modern Transformations in Leisure and Travel. London

Rosen, Jeffery, 1994. “Hugo Black: A Biography,” New Republic, 5 December, 110Google Scholar

Rosenfeld, Michel, 1992. “Deconstruction and Legal Interpretation: Conflict, Indeterminacy and the Temptations of the New Legal Formalism,” in Drucilla Cornell, Michael Rosenfeld, and David Gray (eds.), Deconstruction and the Possibility of Justice. New York: 152–210

Ross, Andrew (ed.), 1996. Science Wars. Durham, NC

Ross, Colin, 1995. “Errors in Logic in Biological Psychiatry,” in Colin Ross and Alvin Pam (eds.), Pseudoscience in Biological Psychiatry: Blaming the Body. New York: 85–128

Ross, Colin, and Alvin Pam (eds.), 1995. Pseudoscience in Biological Psychiatry: Blaming the Body. New York

Roth, Martha, 1998. Arousal: Bodies and Pleasures. Minneapolis

Rothenberg, David, 1995a. “Introduction: Wildness Untamed: The Evolution of an Ideal,” in David Rothenberg (ed.), Wild Ideas. Minneapolis: xiii–xxvii

Rothenberg, David, 1995b. “Epilogue: Paradox Wild,” in David Rothenberg (ed.), Wild Ideas. Minneapolis: 213–218

Rouse, Joseph, 1996. Engaging Science: How to Understand its Practices Philosophically. Ithaca, NY

Rousseau, Jean Jacques, 1755/1983. Discourse on the Origin of Inequality. Indianapolis

Rousseau, Jean Jacques, 1762/1963. Emile. London

Rozin, Paul, Jonathan Haidt, and Clark McCauly, 2000. “Disgust,” in Michael Lewis and Jeanette Haviland-Jones (eds.), The Handbook of Emotions. New York: 637–653

Sandelowski, Margarete, andLinda, Corson Jones, 1996. “‘Healing Fictions’: Stories of Choosing in the Aftermath of the Detection of Fetal Anomalies,” Social Science and Medicine 42: 353–361CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Santoni, Ronald, 1993. “On the Existential Meaning of Violence,” Dialogue and Humanism 4: 139–151Google Scholar

Sarat, Austin, 1990. “‘ … The Law is All Over’: Power, Resistance and the Legal Consciousness of the Welfare Poor,” Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities 2: 343–379Google Scholar

Sarat, Austin, (ed.), 2001. Pain, Death and the Law. Ann Arbor

Sarat, Austin, and Thomas Kearns (eds.), Law's Violence. Ann Arbor

Scarry, Elaine, 1992. “The Declaration of War: Constitutional and Unconstitutional Violence,” in Austin Sarat and Thomas Kearns (eds.), Law's Violence. Ann Arbor: 23–76

Schlag, Pierre, 1991. “The Problem of the Subject,” Texas Law Review 69: 1627–1743Google Scholar

Schott, Robin May, 1993. “Resurrecting Embodiment,” in Louise Antony and Charlotte Witt (eds.), A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity. Boulder: 171–185

Schultz, Marjorie, 1990. “Reproductive Technology and Intention-Based Parenthood: An Opportunity for Gender Neutrality,” Wisconsin Law Review 1990: 297–398

Schwenger, Peter, 2001. “Words and the Murder of the Thing,” Critical Inquiry 28: 99–113CrossRef Google Scholar

Scruton, Roger, 1986. Sexual Desire: A Moral Philosophy of the Erotic. New York

Scull, Andrew, 1981. “Moral Treatment Reconsidered: Some Sociological Comments on an Episode in the History of British Psychiatry,” in Andrew Scull (ed.), Madhouses, Mad-Doctors and Madmen. Philadelphia

Shacochis, Bob, 1996. “Missing Children,” Harpers, October, 55–61

Shanley, Mary Lyndon, 1993. “Surrogate Mothers and Women's Freedom: A Critique of Contracts for Human Reproduction,” Signs 18: 618–639CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Shapiro, Michael, 1992. “Law, Culpability and the Neural Sciences,” in Roger Masters and Michael McGuire (eds.), The Neurotransmitter Revolution: Serotonin, Social Behavior and the Law. Carbondale, IL: 179–202

Shorter, Edward, 1997. A History of Psychiatry: From the Era of the Asylum to the Age of Prozac. New York

Simpson, Lorenzo, 1995. Technology, Time and the Conversations of Modernity. London

Skinner, B. F., 1974. About Behaviorism. New York

Sokal, Alan, and Jean Bricmont, 1998. Fashionable Nonsense: Postmodern Intellectuals' Abuse of Science. New York

Solomon, Lee, 1995. “Premenstrual Syndrome: The Debate Surrounding Criminal Defense,” Maryland Law Review 54: 571–600Google Scholar

Solomon, Robert, 1993. The Passions: Emotions and the Meaning of Life. Indianapolis

Soper, Kate, 1995. What is Nature? Oxford

Soule, Michael, and Gary Lease (eds.), Reinventing Nature? Responses to Postmodern Deconstruction. Washington

Stanworth, Michelle, 1987. “Reproductive Technologies and the Destruction of Motherhood,” in Michelle Stanworth (ed.), Reproductive Technologies: Gender, Motherhood and Medicine. Minneapolis: 1–9

Steeves, H. Peter, 1999. “They Say Animals Can Smell Fear,” in H. Peter Steeves (ed.), Animal Others: On Ethics, Ontology and Animal Life. Albany: 133–178

Stich, Stephen, 1983. From Folk Psychology to Cognitive Science: The Case against Belief. Cambridge, MA

Strathern, Marilyn, 1992. Reproducing the Future: Essays on Anthropology, Kinship and the New Reproductive Technologies. London

Stumpf, Andrea, 1986. “Redefining Motherhood: A Legal Matrix for New Reproductive Technologies,” Yale Law Journal 96: 187–208CrossRef Google Scholar

Suggs, Ike, 1993. “Caught in the Act: Evaluating the Endangered Species Act, its Effect on Man and the Prospects for Reform,” Cumberland Law Review 24: 1–78Google Scholar

Sullum, Jacob, 2000. “Curing the Therapeutic State: Thomas Szasz on the Medicalization of American Life” (www.reason.com)

Szasz, Thomas, 1990. The Untamed Tongue: A Dissenting Dictionary. La Salle, IL

Talbot, Carl, 1998. “The Wilderness Narrative and the Cultural Logic of Capitalism,” in J. Baird Callicott and Michael Nelson (eds.), The Great New Wilderness Debate. Athens, GA: 325–333

Terborgh, John, 1999. Requiem for Nature. Washington

Thomas, Keith, 1983. Man and the Natural World: Changing Attitudes in England 1500–1800. London

Torrey, E. Fuller, 1992. A Freudian Freud. New York

Tribe, Lawrence, 1988. American Constitutional Law, 2nd ed. Mineola, NY

Turiel, Elliot, 1983. The Development of Social Knowledge: Morality and Convention. Cambridge

Turner, Bryan, 1984. The Body and Society: Explorations in Social Theory. Oxford

Turner, Jack, 1994. “The Quality of Wildness: Preservation, Control and Freedom,” in David Burks (ed.), The Place of the Wild. Washington: 175–189

Turner, Jack, 1996. The Abstract Wild. Tucson

Tushnet, Mark, 1996. “Defending the Indeterminacy Thesis,” Quinnipiac Law Review 16: 339–356Google Scholar

Ulrich, Roger, 1993. “Biophilia, Biophobia and Natural Landscapes,” in Stephen Kellert and E. O. Wilson (eds.), The Biophilia Hypothesis. Washington: 73–137

Unger, Roberto, 1983. The Critical Legal Studies Movement. Cambridge, MA

Walker, Mark Thomas, 1996. “The Voluntariness of Judgment,” Inquiry 39: 97–119CrossRef Google Scholar

Waller, Donald, 1998. “Getting Back to the Right Nature: A Reply to Cronon's ‘The Trouble with Wilderness’,” in J. Baird Callicott and Michael Nelson (eds.), The Great New Wilderness Debate. Athens, GA: 540–567

Weinreb, Lloyd, 1987. Natural Law and Justice. Cambridge, MA

Wicke, Jennifer, 1991. “Postmodern Identity and the Legal Subject,” University of Colorado Law Review 62: 455–473Google Scholar

Wigmore, John Henry, 1914. “The Terminology of Legal Science with a Plea for the Science of Nomothetics,” Harvard Law Review 28: 1–9CrossRef Google Scholar

Wigmore, John Henry, 1917. “The Problems of Law's Evolution,” Virginia Law Review 4: 247–272CrossRef Google Scholar

Wigmore, John Henry, 1919. “Problems of Law's Evolution,” Virginia Law Review 4: 1–9Google Scholar

Williams, Karen, 1998. “The Gift that Made me a Mother,” Good Housekeeping, April, 89

Wilson, Edward, O., 1975. Sociobiology: A New Synthesis. Cambridge, MA

Wilson, Edward, O., 1984. Biophilia. Cambridge, MA

Winick, Bruce, 1997. The Right to Refuse Mental Health Treatment. Washington

Winston, Mark, 1997. Nature Wars. Cambridge, MA

Wolch, Jennifer, and Jody Emel, 1998. “Witnessing the Animal Moment,” in Jennifer Wolch and Jody Emel (eds.), Animal Geographies: Place, Politics and Identity in the Nature–Culture Borderlands. London: 1–25

Wolfe, Alan, 1992. “Algorithmic Justice,” in Drucilla Cornell, Michael Rosenfeld, and David Gray (eds.), Deconstruction and the Possibility of Justice. New York: 361–386

Wolin, Sheldon, 1960. Politics and Vision. Boston

Wolpert, Lewis, and Alison Richard, 1997. The Passionate Mind: The Inner World of Scientists. Oxford

Woods, Mark, 1998. “Federal Wilderness Preservation in the United States: The Preservation of Wilderness?” in J. Baird Callicott and Michael Nelson (eds.), The Great New Wilderness Debate. Athens, GA: 131–153

Yagerman, Katherine, 1990. “Protecting Critical Habitat under the Federal Endangered Species Act,” Environmental Law 20: 811–856Google Scholar

Yanagisako, Sylvia, and Carol Delaney, 1995. Naturalizing Power: Essays in Feminist Cultural Analysis. London

Young, Iris, 1990. “Pregnant Embodiment: Subjectivity and Alienation,” in Iris Young, Throwing Like a Girl and Other Essays in Feminist Philosophy and Social Theory. Bloomington, IN: 160–177

Zachary, G. Pascal, 1999. Endless Frontier: Vannevar Bush, Engineer of the American Century. Cambridge, MA

Zapf, Christian, and Moglen, Eben, 1996. “Linguistic Indeterminacy and the Rule of Law: On the Perils of Misunderstanding Wittgenstein,” Georgetown Law Review 84: 485–520Google Scholar