Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T23:08:23.543Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

19 - Neuroscientific Evidence in Context

from IV - Evidence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2021

By
Deborah W. Denno
Edited by
Bartosz Brożek ,
Jaap Hage  and
Nicole Vincent
Bartosz Brożek
Affiliation:
Jagiellonian University, Krakow
Jaap Hage
Affiliation:
Universiteit Maastricht, Netherlands
Nicole Vincent
Affiliation:
Macquarie University, Sydney
Get access

Summary

In her commentary on Moriarty’s contribution about neuroscientific evidence, Denno examines the scientific environment in which neuroscientific evidence took hold, as well as the complexities that can arise when attempting to decipher the influence of such evidence in the much broader framework of a criminal case that involves hundreds of factors, with neuroimaging tests simply being one component. In this connection, she first discusses the conceptual distance between the evidence that neurosciences can contribute and the legal question that need to be answered. Second, she addresses the historical development of the use of neuroscientific evidence. The comments are concluded by a brief discussion of the different evidentiary standards and their influence on the usability of neuroscientific evidence.

Type
Chapter
Information
Law and Mind
A Survey of Law and the Cognitive Sciences
 , pp. 412 - 420
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aono, D., Yaffe, G., & Kober, H. (2019). Neuroscientific Evidence in the Courtroom: A Review. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications 4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-019–0179-yGoogle Scholar
Bonnie, R. J., Jeffries, J. C., Jr. & Low, P. W. (2008). A Case Study of the Insanity Defense: The Trial of John W. Hinckley, Jr., 3rd ed. St. Paul, MN: Foundation Press.Google Scholar
Denno, D. W. (2005). Criminal Law in a Post-Freudian World. University of Illinois Law Review 3, 601–774.Google Scholar
Denno, D. W. (2015). The Myth of the Double-Edged Sword: An Empirical Study of Neuroscience Evidence in Criminal Cases. Boston College Law Review 56, 493–551.Google Scholar
Denno, D. W. (2017). Concocting Criminal Intent. Georgetown Law Journal 105, 323–378.Google Scholar
Denno, D. W. (2019a). Neuroscience and the Personalization of Criminal Law. University of Chicago Law Review 86, 359–401.Google Scholar
Denno, D. W. (2019b). How Courts in Criminal Cases Respond to Childhood Trauma. Marquette Law Review 103, 302–363.Google Scholar
Garland, B. (2004). Neuroscience and the Law: Brain, Mind, and the Scales of Justice. New York: Dana Press.Google Scholar
Jones, O. D. (2013). Seven Ways Neuroscience Aids Law. In Battro, A. M., Dehaene, S., Sorondo, M. S., & Singer, W. J. (eds.), Neurosciences and the Human Person: New Perspectives on Human Activities. Vatican City: The Pontifical Academy of Sciences, pp. 181–194.Google Scholar
Kansas v. Marsh, 548 U.S. 163, 174 (2006) (quoting LOCKETT V. OHIO, 438 U.S. 586, 604 [1978]).Google Scholar
Moriarty, J. C. (2016). Seeing Voices: Potential Neuroscience Contributions to a Reconstruction of Legal Insanity. Fordham Law Review 85, 599–618.Google Scholar
Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 688 (1984).Google Scholar
Wiggins v. Smith, 539 U.S. 510, 524 (2003).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×