Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-24T08:54:18.352Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - The Movement of the Landless (MST), juridical field, and legal change in Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2009

Peter P. Houtzager
Affiliation:
Institute of Development Studies University of Sussex
Boaventura de Sousa Santos
Affiliation:
Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal
César A. Rodríguez-Garavito
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

What forms of legal change can social movements set in motion to diminish systemic and durable forms of social exclusion? And when are movements successful at doing so? This chapter explores these two questions in the context of the struggle for land waged by the Movement of the Landless' (MST) in Brazil, a country which has one of the most unequal land distributions in the world. It focuses in particular on the movement's emergent juridical strategy and that strategy's contribution to legal change. The MST rarely initiates legal action itself, and in fact does not have standing to bring cases to expropriate land for agrarian reform, which is the preserve of federal government. In recent years, however, its reactive juridical strategy – in civil and criminal cases brought against it – has grown increasingly sophisticated. The movement has helped produce watershed legal precedents, contributed to a broader process of constitutionalizing law, and made access to land more equitable in parts of Brazil by redefining property rights in practice.

These outcomes have been achieved at a world historic moment when powerful international institutions are committed to globalizing a new “classic” interpretation of liberal property rights. The creation of rural and urban land markets, modeled on a mythologized account of Western property regimes, has become a pillar of many international programs of structural reform and to combat poverty.

Type
Chapter
Information
Law and Globalization from Below
Towards a Cosmopolitan Legality
, pp. 218 - 240
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barroso, Luís Roberto. 2002a. O Direito Constitucional e a Efetividade de Suas Normas: Limites e Possibilidades da Constituição Brasileira. Rio de Janeiro: Renovar.Google Scholar
Barroso, Luís Roberto.2002b. “Fundamentos Teóricos e Filosóficos do Novo Direito Constitucional Brasileiro.” Jus Navigandi 59:157.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1987. “The Force of Law: Toward a Sociology of the Juridical Field.” Hastings Law Journal 38: 814–853.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, and Wacquant, Loïc. 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, and Garth, Bryant. 1998. Dealing in Virtue: International Commercial Arbitration and the Construction of a Transnational Legal Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Diomo, Ana Maria. 1995. A Vez e Voz do Popular: Movimentos Sociais e Participação Política no Brasil Pós-70. Rio de Janeiro: ANPOCS/Relume Dumará.
Epp, Charles. 1998. The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Facchini Netto, Eugênio. 2003. “Fundamental Rights in the Balance: One View of the Cathedral, through a Judge's Eye.” Paper presented at the International Workshop on “Fundamental Rights in the Balance: New Ideas on the Rights to Property, Land, and Shelter,” 16–18 October 2003, Institute of Development Studies, Brighton, UK.
Galanter, Marc. 1981. “Justice in Many Rooms: Courts, Private Ordering, and Indigenous Law.” Journal of Legal Pluralism 19:1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houtzager, Peter. 2001a. “We Make the Law and the Law Makes Us: Some Ideas on a Law in Development Research Agenda.” IDS Bulletin 32(1):8–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houtzager, Peter.2001b. “Collective Action and Patterns of Political Authority: Rural Workers, Church, and State in Brazil.” Theory and Society 30(1):1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, Alan. 1993. Explorations in Law and Society: Toward a Constitutive Theory of Law. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
ITESP. 2000. Mediação no Campo: Estratégias de Ação em Situações de Conflito Fundiário. 2nd edition. Cadernos ITESP No. 6. São Paulo: ITESP, Paginas e Letras.
Mançano, Bernardo. 1996. MST: Formação e Territorialização em São Paulo. São Paulo: Editora Hucitec.Google Scholar
Mançano, Bernardo.2000. A Formação do MST no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Vozes.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug, Tarrow, Sidney, and Tilly, Charles. 2001. Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merryman, John. 1985. The Civil Law Tradition: An Introduction to the Legal Systems of Western Europe and Latin America. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Navarro, Zander. 1997. “Sete Teses Equivocadas sobre as Lutas Sociais no Campo, o MST e a Reform Agrária.” In A Reforma Agrária e a Luta do MST, edited by Stedile, João Pedro. Rio de Janeiro: Vozes.Google Scholar
Navarro, Zander.2001. “‘Mobilização sem emancipação' – as lutas sociais dos sem-terra no Brasil.” In Reinventando a emancipação social, edited by Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. São Paulo: Record.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 1995. Toward a New Common Sense: Law, Science and Politics in the Paradigmatic Transition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa.2002. Toward a New Legal Common Sense: Law, Globalization, and Emancipation. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Streck, Lenio. 2002. Jurisdição Constitucional e Hermenêutica: Uma Nova Crítica do Direito. Porto Alegre: Livraria do Advogado.Google Scholar
Strozake, Juvelino (Ed.). 2000. A Questão Agrária e a Justiça. São Paulo: Editora Revista dos Tribunais.Google Scholar
Strozake, Juvelino(Ed.). 2002. Questões Agrárias: Julgados comentados e Pareceres. São Paulo: Editora Método.Google Scholar
Varella, Marcelo. 1997. “O MST e o Direito.” In A Reforma Agrária e a Luta do MST, edited by Stédile, João Pedro. Petrópolis: Vozes.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×