Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-24T08:54:19.592Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Campaigning for life: building a new transnational solidarity in the face of HIV/AIDS and TRIPS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2009

Heinz Klug
Affiliation:
Professor of Law University of Wisconsin-Madison
Boaventura de Sousa Santos
Affiliation:
Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal
César A. Rodríguez-Garavito
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

In a dramatic display of political astuteness, six hundred volunteers under the banner of the Treatment Action Campaign, a non-government organization dedicated to ensuring access to treatment for the millions of South Africans infected with HIV/AIDS, commemorated human rights day in South Africa in 2003 by marching on the same police station at Sharpeville where anti-apartheid protestors had been gunned down on March 21, 1960. Symbolizing the number of South Africans dying each day from HIV/AIDS-related illnesses, the demonstrators demanded that the government immediately agree to establish an antiretroviral treatment program in the public health sector. At the same time, fellow TAC protestors in Durban and Cape Town highlighted the urgency of their demands by laying formal charges of culpable homicide against the Minister of Health as well as the Minister of Trade and Industry whom they accused of negligently failing to act and thus of causing the deaths of thousands of AIDS sufferers.

This campaign reflects a situation in marked contrast to the day nearly a decade before in May 1994, when Nelson Mandela, in his first official exercise of power as President of South Africa, announced that free health services must be provided to all children under the age of six and to pregnant women. Yet, unlike the over forty-year struggle against apartheid, within a year the government had conceded that the public sector must provide treatment and was instead embroiled in a debate over the pace of implementation of the promised program.

Type
Chapter
Information
Law and Globalization from Below
Towards a Cosmopolitan Legality
, pp. 118 - 139
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

African National Congress. 1994a. “A National Health Plan for South Africa.” Prepared by the ANC with the technical support of WHO and UNICEF, May.
African National Congress.1994b. “RDP White Paper Discussion Document.” September.
Bond, Patrick. 1999. “Globalization, Pharmaceutical Pricing and South African Health Policy: Managing Confrontation with US Firms and Politicians.” International Journal of Health Services 29(4):765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Consumer Project on Technology. 1999. Cptech, Appendix B: Time-Line of Disputes over Compulsory Licensing and Parallel Importation in South Africa, http://www.cptech.org/ip/health/sa/sa-timeline.txt, August 5, 1999.
Deeb, M. T. 1998a. Founding Affidavit, February, 18 High Court of South Africa.
Deeb, M. T.1998b. Supplementary Affidavit by M. T. Deeb, July 23, High Court of South Africa.
Department of Health, “National Drug Policy for South Africa.” January.
International Intellectual Property Institute. 2000. Patent Protection and Access to HIV/AIDS Pharmaceuticals in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: International Intellectual Property Institute.
Klug, Heinz. 2000. Constituting Democracy: Law, Globalism and South Africa's Political Reconstruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minister of Health v. Treatment Action Campaign 2002 (5) SA 721 (CC).
Moy, Carl R. 1993. “The History of the Patent Harmonization Treaty: Economic Self-Interest as an Influence.” John Marshall Law Review 26:457Google Scholar
Ryan, Michael. 1998. “Knowledge Diplomacy: Global Competition and the Politics of Intellectual Property.” Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 2002. Toward a New Legal Common Sense: Law, Globalization and Emancipation. London: .Butterworths.Google Scholar
Sell, Susan K. 2003. Private Power, Public Law: The Globalization of Intellectual Property Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soobramoney v. Minister of Health, KwaZulu-Natal 1997 (12) BCLR 1696 (CC).
WTO. 1994. Final Act Embodying the Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×