Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T10:27:16.525Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 January 2018

Betsy E. Evans
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Erica J. Benson
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Eau Claire
James N. Stanford
Affiliation:
Dartmouth College, New Hampshire
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Language Regard
Methods, Variation and Change
, pp. 1 - 28
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albarracín, Dolores, Johnson, Blair T., & Zanna, Mark P. (eds.). 2005. The Handbook of Attitudes. Malwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Albarracín, Dolores, Johnson, Blair T., Zanna, Mark P., & Kumkale, G. Tarcan. 2005. Attitudes: Introduction and scope. In Albarracín et al. (eds.), 319.Google Scholar
Alfaraz, Gabriela G. 2002. Miami Cuban perceptions of varieties of Spanish. In Long & Preston (eds.), 111.Google Scholar
Bassili, John N. & Brown, Rick D.. 2005. Implicit and explicit attitudes: Research, challenges, and theory. In Albarracín et al. (eds.), 543574.Google Scholar
Bijvoet, Ellen & Fraurud, Kari. 2011. Language variation and varieties in contemporary multilingual Stockholm: An exploratory pilot study of young peoples’ perceptions. In Källström, Roger & Lindberg, Inger (eds.), Young Urban Swedish. Gothenburg: Department of Swedish Language, University of Gothenburg, pp. 1–34.Google Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. 2012. The Implicit Association Test and sociolinguistic meaning. Lingua 122. 753763.Google Scholar
Conrey, Briana, Potts, Geoffrey, & Niedzielski, Nancy. 2005. Effects of dialect on merger perception: ERP and behavioral correlates. Brain and Language 95(3). 435449.Google Scholar
Cramer, Jennifer & Montgomery, Chris. 2016. Cityscapes and Perceptual Dialectology: Global Perspectives on Non-linguists’ Knowledge of the Dialect Landscape. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2008. Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(4). 453476Google Scholar
Evans, Betsy. 2001. Dialect Contact and the Northern Cities Shift in Ypsilanti, Michigan. PhD dissertation. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.Google Scholar
Evans, Betsy. 2011. “Seattletonian” to “faux hick”: Perceptions of English in Washington State. American Speech 86(4). 383414Google Scholar
Fazio, Russell H., Sanbonmatsu, David M., Powell, Martha C., & Kardes, Frank R.. 1986. On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Social Psychology 50. 229238.Google Scholar
Garrett, Peter. 2010. Attitudes to Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gawronski, Bertram & Payne, B. Keith (eds.). 2010. Handbook of Implicit Social Cognition. New York/London: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Greenwald, Anthony G., McGhee, Debbie E., & Schwartz, Jordan L. K. 1998. Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74. 14641480.Google Scholar
Hall-Lew, , Nola Stephens, Lauren, 2015. Country talk. Journal of English Linguistics 40(3). 256280.Google Scholar
Hillenbrand, James, Getty, Laura A., Clark, Michael J., & Wheeler, Kimberlee. 1995. Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97(5). 30993111.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell. 1972. Models of the interaction of language and social life. In Gumperz, John J. & Hymes, Dell (eds.) Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication, 3571. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Inoue, Fumio. 1977/8. Hôgen Imêji no Tahenryô Kaiseki [Multi-variate analysis of dialect image] (part 1). Gengo Seikatsu 311. 8291.Google Scholar
Inoue, Fumio. 1978/9. Hôgen Imêji no Tahenryô Kaiseki [Multi-variate analysis of dialect image] (part 2). Gengo Seikatsu 312. 8288.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith. 2001. “Style” as distinctiveness: The culture and ideology of linguistic differentiation. In Eckert, Penelope & Rickford, John R. (eds.), Style and Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 21–43.Google Scholar
Ito, Rika. 1999. Diffusion of Urban Sound Change in Rural Michigan: A Case of the Northern Cities Shift. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Jones, Jamila. 2003. African Americans in Lansing & the Northern Cities Vowel Shift. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Jones, Jamila & Preston, Dennis R.. 2011. AAE & identity: Constructing & deploying linguistic resources (https://www.msu.edu/~dwyer/06-JonesPreston.pdf). D. Dwyer (ed.), The Joy of Language: Proceedings of a Symposium Honoring the Colleagues of David Dwyer on the Occasion of His Retirement. http://www.msu.edu/%7Edwyer/JOLIndex.htm.Google Scholar
Kerswill, Paul. 1993. Rural dialect speakers in an urban speech community. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 3(1). 3356.Google Scholar
Kerswill, Paul. 1994. Dialects Converging: Rural Speech in Urban Norway. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Koops, Christian, Gentry, Elizabeth, & Pantos, Andrew. 2008. The effect of perceived speaker age on the perception of PIN and PEN vowels in Houston, Texas. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 14(2). (Selected papers from NWAV 36). http://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol14/iss2/.Google Scholar
Kristiansen, Tore. 2009. The macro-level social meanings of late-modern Danish accents. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 41. 167192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kutas, Marta & Hillyard, S. A.. 1984. Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature 307. 161163.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 2002. Driving forces in linguistic change. Paper presented to the International Conference on Korean Linguistics, Seoul National University.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 2005. Handout for LSA.218: Sound Change in Progress. A course taught at the 2005 LSA Institute. Harvard University and Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Labov, William, Ash, Sharon, & Boberg, Charles. 2006. The Atlas of North American English: Phonetics, Phonology and Sound Change. A Multimedia Reference Tool. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Long, Daniel & Preston, Dennis R. (eds.). 2002. Handbook of Perceptual Dialectology, Vol. 2, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Loudermilk, Brandon C. 2015. Implicit attitude and the perception of sociolinguistic variation. In Prikhodkine, & Preston, (eds.). 137156.Google Scholar
Lucas, Ceil, Bayley, Robert, & Valli, Clayton. 2003. What’s Your Sign for Pizza? Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Christopher & Stoeckle, Phillip. 2013. Geographic information systems and perceptual dialectology: A method for processing draw-a-map data. Journal of Linguistic Geography 1(1). 5285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niedzielski, Nancy. 1997. The Effect of Social Information on the Perception of Sociolinguistic Variables. PhD dissertation. Santa Barbara, CA: University of California Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
Niedzielski, Nancy. 1999. The effect of social information on the perception of sociolinguistic variables. In Milroy, Lesley & Preston, Dennis R. (eds.), Attitudes, Perception, and Linguistic Issues. Journal of Language and Social Psychology special issue 18(1). 162185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niedzielski, Nancy & Preston, Dennis R.. 2003. Folk Linguistics (rev. paperback ed.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
North Carolina Language and Life Project. https://www.ncsu.edu/linguistics/ncllp/Google Scholar
Onishi, Isao & Long, Daniel. 1997. Perceptual dialectology quantifier (PDQ) for Windows. http://nihongo.hum.tmu.ac.jp/,long/maps/perceptmaps.htm (July 2, 2012).Google Scholar
Pantos, Andrew. 2015. Applying the implicit association test to language attitudes research. In Prikhodkine, & Preston, (eds.), 117136.Google Scholar
Peterson, Gordon E. & Barney, Harold L.. 1952. Control methods used in a study of the vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 24(2). 175184.Google Scholar
Plichta, Bartłomiej. 2004. Interdisciplinary Perspectives on the Northern Cities Chain Shift. PhD dissertation. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.Google Scholar
Potter, Jonathan & Wetherell, Margaret. 1987. Discourse and Social Psychology. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 1989. Perceptual Dialectology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 1991. Sorting out the variables in sociolinguistic theory. American Speech 66(1). 326.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 1994. Content-oriented discourse analysis & folk linguistics. Language Sciences 16(2). 285330.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 1996. Where the worst English is spoken. In Schneider, Edgar (ed.), Focus on the USA. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 297–360.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 1999a. A language attitude approach to the perception of regional variety. In Preston, (ed.). 1999b, 359373.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. (ed.). 1999b. Handbook of Perceptual Dialectology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 2005. Belle’s body just caught the fit gnat: The perception of Northern Cities shifted vowels by local speakers. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics (Selected papers from NWAV 33) 11(2). 133146.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 2010. Variation in language regard. In Gilles, Peter, Scharloth, Joachim & Ziegler, Evelyn (eds.), Variatio delectat: Empirische Evidenzen und theoretische Passungen sprachlicher Variation, für Klaus J. Mattheier zum 65. Geburtstag. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, pp. 7–27.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 2011. The power of language regard – Discrimination, classification, comprehension, and production. In Dirk Speelman, Stefan Grondelaers & John Nerbonne (eds.), Proceedings of Production, Perception, Attitude 2009. Dialectologia special issue II. 9–33. http://www.publicacions.ub.es/revistes/dialectologiaSP2011/.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. To appear. [ˈsʌδɚn], [ˈsʌδən], [ˈsʌδɹən], [ˈsʌδn], [sʌːn], etc...: what we/they think/thought it is/was/will be. In Reaser, Jeff, Wolfram, Walt & Thomas, Erik (eds.). LAVIS IV. Raleigh: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. and Howe, George M. 1987. Computerized studies of mental dialect maps. In Denning, K. M., Inkelas, S., McNair-Knox, F., & Rickford, J. (eds.), Variation in language: NWAV-XV at Stanford (Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Conference on New Ways of Analyzing Variation), 361378. Stanford CA: Department of Linguistics, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R., Ocumpaugh, Jaclyn, & Roeder, Rebecca. 2009. L1 & L2 accents: Where the action is. Lingua y migración/Language & Migration 2(1). 520.Google Scholar
Prikhodkine, Alexei. 2011. Dynamique normative de français en usage en Suisse romande. Condé-sur-Noireau: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Prikhodkine, Alexei & Preston, Dennis R. (eds.). 2015. Responses to Language Varieties: Variability, Processes, and Outcomes (IMPACT: Studies in Language and Society 39). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Purnell, Thomas, Idsardi, William, & Baugh, John. 1999. Perceptual and phonetic experiments in American English dialect identification. In Milroy, Lesley & Preston, Dennis R. (eds.), Attitudes, perception, and linguistic issues. Journal of Language and Social Psychology special issue 18(1). 1030.Google Scholar
Purschke, Christoph. 2015. REACT – A constructivist theoretic framework for attitudes. In Prikhodkine, Preston (eds.), 3753.Google Scholar
Ramos-Pellicia, Michelle. 2009. Language Contact and Dialect Contact: Cross-generational Phonological Variation in a Puerto Rican Community in the Midwest of the United States. Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag.Google Scholar
Rodgers, Elena & Preston, Dennis R.. 2015. Arguments and analyses. Paper presented to GURT (Georgetown University Roundtable on Language and Linguistics), Washington DC.Google Scholar
Siegel, Jeff. 2010. Second Dialect Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Soukup, Barbara. 2015. Mixing methods in the study of language attitudes: Theory and application, In Prikhodkine, & Preston, (eds.), 5584.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1972. Sex, covert prestige and linguistic change in the urban British English of Norwich. Language in Society 1(2). 179195.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1986. Dialects in Contact. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 2011. Sociolinguistic Typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel, Labov, William, & Herzog, Marvin I.. 1968. Empirical foundations for a theory of linguistic change. In Lehmann, W. F. & Malkiel, Yakov (eds.), Directions for Historical Linguistics, 95188. Austin/London: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt. 2000. Endangered dialects and social commitment. In Peyton, Joy Kreeft, Griffin, Peg, Wolfram, Walt & Fasold, Ralph (eds.), Language in Action: New Studies of Language in Society, 1939. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
Wollard, Kathryn A. 1998. Introduction: Language ideology as a field of inquiry. In Schieffelin, Bambi B., Woolard, Kathryn A., & Kroskrity, Paul V. (eds.), Language Ideologies: Practice and Theory, 347. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×