Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T02:01:34.478Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 December 2009

Stephen R. Anderson
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
David W. Lightfoot
Affiliation:
Georgetown University, Washington DC
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Language Organ
Linguistics as Cognitive Physiology
, pp. 244 - 256
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, C. 1997. Investigating the origins of the “group genitive” in English. Transactions of the Philological Society 95. 111–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, C. 2002. Case and Middle English genitive noun phrases. In Lightfoot 2002. 57–80
Anderson, S. R. 1974. The organization of phonology. New York: Academic Press
Anderson, S. R. 1976. On the description of consonant gradation in Fula. Studies in African Linguistics 7. 93–136Google Scholar
Anderson, S. R. 1978. Syllables, segments and the northwest Caucasian languages. In Syllables and segments, ed. by A. Bell and J. B. Hooper. 47–58. Amsterdam: North-Holland
Anderson, S. R. 1981. Why phonology isn't “natural.” Linguistic Inquiry 12. 493–539Google Scholar
Anderson, S. R. 1985. Phonology in the twentieth century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Anderson, S. R. 1988. Objects (direct and not so direct) in English and other languages. In On language: a Festschrift for Robert Stockwell, ed. by C. Duncan-Rose, T. Vennemann and J. Fisiak. 279–306. Beckenham, Kent: Croom-Helm
Anderson, S. R. 1990. The grammar of Icelandic verbs in -st. In Icelandic syntax, ed. by J. Maling and A. Zaenen. Syntax & Semantics 24. 235–273. New York: Academic Press
Anderson, S. R. 1992. A-morphous morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Anderson, S. R. 1993. Linguistic expression and its relation to modality. In Current issues in ASL phonology, ed. by G. R. Coulter. Phonetics and Phonology 3. San Diego: Academic Press
Anderson, S. R. 2000. Reflections on “on the phonetic rules of Russian.” Folia Linguistica 34. 1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, S. R. forthcoming. Doctor Dolittle's delusion: animal communication and the nature of human language
Anderson, S. R. and Lightfoot, D. W.. 1999. The human language faculty as an organ. Annual Review of Physiology 62. 697–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersson, A-B. and Dahl, O.. 1974. Against the penthouse principle. Linguistic Inquiry 5. 451–454Google Scholar
Aronoff, M. 1976. Word formation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Aronoff, M. 1988. Two senses of lexical. Proceedings of the Eastern States Conference on Linguistics 5. 13–23Google Scholar
Baker, M. 2001. The atoms of language. New York: Basic Books
Barbosa, P., D. Fox, P. Hagstrom, M. McGinnis and D. Pesetsky, eds. 1998. Is the best good enough? Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Barbour, J. 2000. The end of time. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Bates, E. A. and Elman, J. L.. 1996. Learning rediscovered. Science 274. 1849–1850CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bauer, L. 1995. The emergence and development of SVO patterning in Latin and French. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Bazell, C. E. 1952. The correspondence fallacy in structural linguistics. Studies by Members of the English Department, Istanbul University 3. 1–41Google Scholar
Beard, R. 1995. Lexeme-morpheme base morphology: a general heory of inflection and word formation. Albany: SUNY Press
Beckman, M., J. Edwards and J. Fletcher. 1992. Prosodic structure and tempo in a sonority model of articulatory dynamics. In Docherty and Ladd 1992. 68–86
Bellugi, U., S. Marks, A. Bihrle and H. Sabo. 1993. Dissociation between language and cognitive functions in Williams Syndrome. In Language development in exceptional circumstances, ed. by D. Bishop and K. Mogford. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Berthier, M. L., Rutz, A., Massone, M. I., Starkstein, S. E. and Leiguarda, R. C.. 1991. Foreign accent syndrome: behavioral and anatomical findings in recovered and non-recovered patients. Aphasiology 5. 129–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickerton, D. 1984. The language bioprogram hypothesis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7. 173–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickerton, D. 1999. How to acquire language without positive evidence: what acquisitionists can learn from creoles. In DeGraff 1999. 49–74
Bishop, D. V. M. 1997. Uncommon understanding: development and disorders of language comprehension in children. London: Psychology
Bittner, M. 1987. On the semantics of the Greenlandic antipassive and related constructions. International Journal of American Linguistics 53. 194–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, B. 1994. Case. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Bloch, B. 1941. Phonemic overlapping. American Speech 16. 278–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, L. 1933. Language. New York: Holt
Bloomfield, L. 1939. Menomini morphophonemics. Travaux du cercle linguistique de Prague 8. 105–115Google Scholar
Bloomfield, L. 1962. The Menomini language. New Haven: Yale University Press. [Charles F. Hockett, ed.]
Blumstein, S. E., Alexander, M. P., Ryalls, J. H., Katz, W. and Dworetzky, B.. 1987. On the nature of the foreign accent syndrome: a case study. Brain and Language 31. 215–244CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boas, F., ed. 1911. Handbook of American Indian languages. Bulletin 40, part I. Bureau of American Ethnology
Boatman, D., Gordon, B., Stone, M. and Anderson, S.. 1994. Studies of articulatory timing in normal and foreign accent syndrome speech. Brain and Language 47. 549–552Google Scholar
Borer, H. and K. Wexler. 1987. The maturation of syntax. In Parameter setting, ed. by T. Roeper and E. Williams. 123–172. Dordrecht: Reidel
Bowerman, M. F. 1973. Structural relationships in children's utterances: syntactic or semantic? In Cognitive development and the acquisition of language, ed. by T. E. Moore. New York: Academic Press
Boyce, S. E., Krakow, R. A. and Bell-Berti, F.. 1991. Phonological underspecification and speech motor organization. Phonology 8. 219–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brentari, D. 1995. Sign language phonology: ASL. In The handbook of phonological theory, ed. by J. A. Goldsmith. 615–639. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell
Briscoe, E. 2000. Grammatical acquisition: innovative bias and coevolution of language and the language acquisition device. Language 76. 245–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broe, M. B. and J. B. Pierrehumbert. 2000. Papers in laboratory phonology vol. V: Acquisition and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Browman, C. and Goldstein, L.. 1990a. Gestural specification using dynamically-defined articulatory structures. Journal of Phonetics 18. 299–320Google Scholar
Browman, C. and L. Goldstein. 1990b. Tiers in articulatory phonology, with some implications for casual speech. In Kingston and Beckman 1990. 341–346
Browman, C. and Goldstein, L.. 1992a. Articulatory phonology: an overview. Phonetica 49. 155–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browman, C. and L. Goldstein. 1992b. Targeted and targetless schwas. Paper presented at International Phonologietagung, Krems, Austria
Browman, C. and L. Goldstein. 1992c. “Targetless” schwa: an articulatory analysis. In Docherty and Ladd 1992. 26–56
Browman, C. and L. Goldstein. 1998. Competing constraints on intergestural coordination and self-organization of phonological structures. Read at Current Trends in Phonology, II, Royaumont, France
Browman, C. P., L. M. Goldstein, D. N. Honoroff, A. Jebbour and E. Selkirk. 1998. Gestural organizations underlying syllable structure in Tashlhiyt Berber. Read at Current Trends in Phonology, II, Royaumont, France
Brown, C. M. and P. Hagoort, eds. 1999. The neurocognition of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Byrd, D., A. Kaun, S. Narayanan and E. Saltzman. 2000. Phrasal signatures in articulation. In Broe and Pierrehumbert. 70–87
Byrd, D. and Saltzman, E.. 1998. Intragestural dynamics of multiple prosodic boundaries. Journal of Phonetics 26. 173–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caplan, D. 1987. Neurolinguistics and linguistic aphasiology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Carbary, T. J., Patterson, J. P. and Snyder, P. J.. 2000. Foreign accent syndrome following a catastrophic second injury: MRI correlates, linguistic and voice pattern analyses. Brain and Cognition 43. 78–85Google ScholarPubMed
Choi, J. D. 1992. Phonetic underspecification and target interpolation: an acoustic study of Marshallese vowel allophony. Working Papers in Phonetics 82. Los Angeles: Phonetics Laboratory, UCLA
Chomsky, N. 1959. Review of B. F. Skinner, Verbal Behavior. Language 35. 547–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1964. The logical basis of linguistic theory. Proceedings of the ninth international congress of linguists, Cambridge, MA, August 27–31, 1962, ed. by H. G. Lunt. 914–978. The Hague: Mouton
Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Chomsky, N. 1975. Reflections on language. New York: Pantheon
Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris
Chomsky, N. 1986. Knowledge of language. New York: Praeger
Chomsky, N. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Chomsky, N. 2000. New horizons in the study of language and mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Chomsky, N. and M. Halle. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row
Clahsen, H. and Almazan, M.. 1998. Syntax and morphology in Williams Syndrome. Cognition 68. 167–198CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clahsen, H., Bartke, S. and Gollner, S.. 1997. Formal features in impaired grammars: a comparison of English and German SLI children. Essex Research Reports in Linguistics 14. 42–75Google Scholar
Clark, R. 1992. The selection of syntactic knowledge. Language Acquisition 2. 83–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulter, G. R. ed. 1993. Current issues in ASL Phonology. Phonetics and Phonology 3. San Diego, CA: Academic Press
Crain, S. 1991. Language acquisition in the absence of experience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14. 597–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crain, S. and C. McKee. 1986. The acquisition of structural restrictions on anaphora. In Proceedings of North Eastern Linguistics Society 16, ed. by I. S. Berman, J. Choe and J. McDonough. 94–110. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts, GLSA
Crain, S. and R. Thornton. 1998. Investigations in Universal Grammar: a guide to experiments on the acquisition of syntax and semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Culicover, P. 1997. Principles and parameters: an introduction to syntactic theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Curtiss, S. 1988. Abnormal language acquisition and the modularity of language. In Linguistics: the Cambridge survey, ed. by F. J. Newmeyer. Vol. II. 96–116. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Darnell, R. 1990. Edward Sapir. Berkeley: University of California Press
Darwin, C. 1874. The descent of man. New York: Appleton. [Second edition, 1889.]
Dawkins, R. 1976. The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press
de Boysson-Bardies, B. 1999. How language comes to children. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
de Saussure, F. 1879. Mémoire sur le système primitif des voyelles dans les langues indo-européennes. Leipzig: Tübner
de Saussure, F. 1974. Cours de linguistique générale. critical edn. Paris: Payot. [Prepared by Tullio de Mauro.]
DeGraff, M., ed. 1999. Language creation and change: creolization, diachrony and development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Dekkers, J., F. van der Leeuw and J. van deWeijer, eds. 2000. Optimality theory: phonology, syntax and acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press
deVilliers, J. and P. deVilliers. 1985. The acquisition of English. In The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, ed. by D. Slobin. 27–139. Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Di Sciullo, A-M. and E. Williams. 1987. On the definition of word. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Dobzhansky, T. 1970. Genetics of the evolutionary process. New York: Columbia University Press
Docherty, G. J. and D. R. Ladd, eds. 1992. Papers in laboratory phonology, Vol. II: Gesture, segment, prosody. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Dresher, B. E. 1999. Charting the learning path: cues to parameter setting. Linguistic Inquiry 30. 27–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dresher, B. E. and Idsardi, W.. 1999. Prerequisites for a theory of diachronic adaptation. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 18. 212–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumézil, G. 1975. Le verbe oubykh: études descriptives et comparatives. Mémoires de l'Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-lettres 1. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale
Edwards, S. and Bastiaanse, R.. 1998. Diversity in the lexical and syntactic abilities of fluent aphasic speakers. Aphasiology 12(2). 99–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekwall, E. 1943. Studies on the genitive of groups in English. Lund: Gleerup
Engdahl, E. 1985. Parasitic gaps, resumptive pronouns, and subject extractions. Linguistics 23. 3–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finger, S. 2000. Minds behind the brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Flourens, M.-J.-P. 1824. Récherche expérimentale sur les propriétés et les fonctions du système nerveux dans les animaux vertébrés. Paris: Ballières
Flourens, M.-J.-P. 1846. Phrenology examined. Philadelphia: Hogan & Thompson. Translated from the 2nd French edition (1842) by C. de L. Meigs
Fodor, J. D. 1998. Unambiguous triggers. Linguistic Inquiry 29. 1–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, C. A. 1990. Some regularities of speech are not consequences of formal rules: Comments on Keating's paper. In Kingston and Beckman 1990. 476–489
Friedmann, N. and Grodzinsky, Y.. 1997. Tense and agreement in agrammatic production: pruning the syntactic tree. Brain and Language 56. 397–425CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frith, U. 1991. Autism and Asperger Syndrome. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Fujimura, O. 1994. C/D model: a computational model of phonetic implementation. In Language computations, ed. by E. S. Ristad. 1–20. American Mathematical Society
Gardner, R. A. and Gardner, B. T.. 1969. Teaching sign language to a chimpanzee. Science 165. 664–672CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gazzaniga, M. S. 1996. Conversations in the cognitive neurosciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Gibson, E. and Wexler, K.. 1994. Triggers. Linguistic Inquiry 25. 407–454Google Scholar
Gleitman, L. and E. Wanner. 1982. Introduction. In Language acquisition: the state of the art, ed. by E. Wanner and L. Gleitman. 3–48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Goldin-Meadow, S. and Mylander, C.. 1990. Beyond the input given: the child's role in the acquisition of language. Language 66. 323–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gopnik, M. 1990. Feature blindness: a case study. Language Acquisition 1(2). 139–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gopnik, M. 1997. Language deficits and genetic factors. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1. 5–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gopnik, M. and Crago, M.. 1991. Familial aggregation of a developmental language disorder. Cognition 39. 1–50CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graff-Radford, N. R., Cooper, W. E., Colsher, P. L. and Damasio, A. R.. 1986. An unlearned foreign “accent” in a patient with aphasia. Brain and Language 28. 86–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, J. H. 1963. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Universals of language, ed. by J. H. Greenberg. 73–112. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Grimm, J. 1848. Geschichte der deutschen Sprache. Vol. I. Leipzig: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung
Grimshaw, J. 1990. Argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Grodzinsky, Y. 2000. The neurology of syntax: language use without Broca's area. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23. 1–21CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guy, G. R. 1991a. Contextual conditioning in variable lexical phonology. Language Variation and Change 3. 223–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guy, G. R. 1991b. Explanation in variable phonology: an exponential model of morphological constraints. Language Variation and Change 3. 1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagoort, P., C. M. Brown and L. Osterhaut. 1999. The neurocognition of syntactic processing. In Brown and Hagoort 1999. 273–316
Hale, K. 1976. The adjoined relative clause in Australia. In Grammatical categories in Australian languages, ed. by R. M. W. Dixon. 78–105. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies
Halle, M. 1957. On the phonetic rules of Russian. Unpublished paper read to the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Chicago
Halle, M. 1959. The sound pattern of Russian. The Hague: Mouton
Hamburger, H. and Crain, S.. 1984. Acquisition of cognitive compiling. Cognition 17. 85–136CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, Z. 1951. Methods in structural linguistics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Haspelmath, M. 1999a. Are there principles of grammatical change?Journal of Linguistics 35. 579–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, M. 1999b. Optimality and diachronic adaptation. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 18. 180–205Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. 1999c. Why is grammaticalization irreversible?Linguistics 37. 1043–1068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauser, M. D. and M. Konishi, eds. 1999. The design of animal communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Herbert of Cherbury. 1624/1937. De veritate. University of Bristol Studies Number 6. Translated by M. H. Carré
Hickok, G. and Poeppel, D.. 2000. Towards a functional neuroanatomy of speech perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4. 131–138CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hockett, C. F. 1947. Problems of morphemic analysis. Language 23. 321–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoenigswald, H. 1963. On the history of the comparative method. Anthropological Linguistics 5. 1–11Google Scholar
Hombert, J.-M. 1976. Consonant types, vowel height and tone in Yoruba. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 33. 40–54Google Scholar
Hopper, P. J. and E. Traugott. 1993. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Hornstein, N. and D. Lightfoot. 1981. Introduction. In Explanation in linguistics: the logical problem of language acquisition, ed. by N. Hornstein and D. Lightfoot. 9–31. London: Longman
Householder, F. W. 1965. On some recent claims in phonological theory. Journal of Linguistics 1. 13–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hovav, M. R. and B. Levin. 1992. -er nominals: implications for the theory of argument structure. In Syntax and the lexicon, ed. by T. Stowell and E. Wehrli. Syntax & Semantics 26. 127–153. San Diego: Academic Press
Hubel, D. 1978. Vision and the brain. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 31(7). 28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubel, D. and Wiesel, T.. 1962. Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. Journal of Physiology 160. 106–154CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hughes, H. C. 1999. Sensory exotica. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Ingham, R. 1998. Tense without agreement in early clause structure. Language Acquisition 7. 51–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R. S. 1975. Morphological and semantic regularities in the lexicon. Language 51. 639–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R. S. 1983. Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Jackendoff, R. S. 1990. Semantic structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Jackendoff, R. S. 1994. Patterns in the mind. New York: Basic Books
Jaeger, J. J., Lockwood, A. H., Kemmerer, D. L., Valin, R. D., Murphy, B. W. and Khalak, H. G.. 1996. A positron emission tomography study of regular and irregular verb morphology in English. Language 72. 451–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janda, R. D. 2001. Beyond “pathways” and “unidirectionality”: On the discontinuity of language transmission and the counterability of grammaticalization. Language Sciences 23. 265–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, O. 1909. Progress in language. London: Swan Sonnenschein. [Second edition.]
Joanisse, M. and Seidenberg, M.. 1998. Specific language impairment: a deficit in grammar or processing?Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2. 240–247CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, K., Flemming, E. and Wright, R.. 1993. The hyperspace effect: phonetic targets are hyperarticulated. Language 69. 505–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joseph, B. 2001. Is there such a thing as grammaticalization?Language Sciences 23. 163–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jusczyk, P. 1997. The discovery of spoken language. Cambridge: MIT Press
Kagaya, R. 1971. Laryngeal gestures in Korean stop consonants. Annual Bulletin, Research Institute of Logopedics and Phoniatrics, University of Tokyo 5. 15–23Google Scholar
Keating, P. 1988. Underspecification in phonetics. Phonology 5. 275–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kegl, J. A., A. Senghas and M. Coppola. 1999. Creation through contact: sign language emergence and sign language change in Nicaragua. In DeGraff 1999. 179–237
Keller, E. 1987. The cortical representation of motor processes of speech. In Motor and sensory processes of language, ed. by E. Keller and M. Gopnik. 125–162. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Kenstowicz, M. 1994. Phonology in generative grammar. Cambridge: Blackwell
Kingston, J. and M. Beckman, eds. 1990. Papers in laboratory phonology, Vol. I: Between the grammar and the physics of speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Kingston, J. and Diehl, R. L.. 1994. Phonetic knowledge. Language 70. 419–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, P. 1982. Word formation and the lexicon. In Proceedings of the 1982 Mid-America linguistics conference, ed. by F. Ingemann. 3–29. Lawrence: University of Kansas
Kiparsky, P. 1984. On the lexical phonology of Icelandic. In Nordic prosody, Vol. III, ed. by C.-C. Elert, I. Johansson and E. Strangert. 135–164. Stockholm: University of Umeå (Almqvist and Wiksell)
Kiparsky, P. 1993. Variable rules. Unpublished paper read at Rutgers Optimality Workshop
Kiparsky, P. 1996. The shift to head-initial VP in Germanic. In Studies in comparative Germanic syntax, ed. by H. Thráinsson, S. J. Epstein and S. Peters. 140–179. Dordrecht: Kluwer
Kisseberth, C. 1970a. On the functional unity of phonological rules. Linguistic Inquiry 1. 291–306Google Scholar
Kisseberth, C. 1970b. Vowel elision in Tonkawa and derivational constraints. In Studies presented to Robert B. Lees by his students, ed. by J. Sadock and A. Vanek. 109–138. Edmonton: Linguistic Research
Klima, E. and U. Bellugi. 1979. The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Kosslyn, S. M., M. S. Gazzaniga, A. M. Galaburda and C. Rabin. 1999. Hemispheric specialization. In Fundamental neuroscience, ed. by M. J. Zigmond, F. E. Bloom, S. C. Landis, J. L. Roberts and L. R. Squire. 1521–1542. San Diego: Academic Press
Kroch, A. 1989. Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change 1. 199–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroodsma, D. E. and E. H. Miller, eds. 1996. Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
Kuhl, P. K. 1999. Speech, language and the brain: innate preparation for learning. In Hauser and Konishi 1999. 419–450
Kuipers, A. H. 1960. Phoneme and morpheme in Kabardian. The Hague: Mouton
Kurowski, K. M., Blumstein, S. E. and Alexander, M.. 1996. The foreign accent syndrome: a reconsideration. Brain and Language 54. 1–25CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kutas, M., K. D. Federmeier and M. I. Sereno. 1999. Current approaches to mapping language in electromagnetic space. In Brown and Hagoort 1999. 359–392
Lakoff, R. T. 1972. Another look at drift. In Linguistic change and generative theory, ed. by R. P. Stockwell and R. Macauley. 172–198. Bloomington: Indiana University Press
Langacker, R. W. 1969. Pronominalization and the chain of command. In Modern studies in English, ed. by D. Reibel and S. Schane. 160–186. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
Lasnik, H. 1999. Minimalist analysis. Oxford: Blackwell
Lass, R. 1980. On explaining linguistic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Lass, R. 1997. Historical linguistics and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Laughren, M. 1988. Toward a lexical representation of Warlpiri verbs. In Thematic relations, ed. by W. Wilkins. Syntax and Semantics 21. 215–242. San Diego: Academic Press
Lefebvre, C. 1998. Creole genesis and the acquisition of grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Lehiste, I. 1970. Suprasegmentals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Levy, Y. and Kavé, G.. 1999. Language breakdown and linguistic theory: a tutorial overview. Lingua 107. 95–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, A. M. and Mattingly, I. G.. 1985. The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition 21. 1–36CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lieberman, P. 2000. Human language and our reptilian brain: the subcortical bases of speech, syntax and thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Lightfoot, D. W. 1989. The child's trigger experience: Degree-0 learnability. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12. 321–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, D. W. 1991. How to set parameters: arguments from language change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Lightfoot, D. W. 1994. Degreed-0 learnability. In Syntactic theory and first language acquisition: crosslinguistic perspectives, ed. by B. Lust, G. Hermon and J. Kornfilt. Vol. II. 453–171. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Lightfoot, D. W. 1999. The development of language: acquisition, change and evolution. Oxford: Blackwell
Lightfoot, D. W. ed. 2002. Syntactic effects of morphological change. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Lindblom, B. 1990. Explaining phonetic variation: a sketch of the H and H theory. In Speech production and speech modelling, ed. by W. J. Hardcastle and A. Marchal. 403–439. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic
Locke, J. 1993. The child's path to spoken language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
MacDonnell, A. 1916. A Vedic grammar for students. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Manzini, R. and Wexler, K.. 1987. Parameters, binding theory, and learnability. Linguistic Inquiry 18. 413–444Google Scholar
Marantz, A., Y. Miyashita and W. O'Neil, eds. 2000. Image, language, brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Marchand, H. 1969. The categories and types of present-day English word formation. München: Beck. [Second edition.]
Marler, P. 1970. Birdsong and human speech: could there be parallels?American Scientist 58. 669–674Google ScholarPubMed
Marler, P. 1991. Song-learning behavior: the interface with neuroethology. Trends in Neurosciences 14. 199–206CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marler, P. 1999. On innateness: are sparrow songs “learned” or “innate”? In Hauser and Konishi 1999. 293–318
Marr, D. 1982. Vision. San Francisco: Freeman
Matthei, E. 1982. The acquisition of prenominal modifier sequences. Cognition 11. 201–332CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matthews, G. H. 1955. A phonemic analysis of a Dakota dialect. International Journal of American Linguistics 21. 56–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattingly, I. G. and M. Studdert-Kennedy, eds. 1991. Modularity and the motor theory of speech perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum
Mayeux, R. and E. R. Kandel. 1991. Disorders of language: the aphasias. In Principles of neural science, ed. by E. Kandel, J. H. Schwartz and T. M. Jessel. 839–851. New York: Elsevier
McCarthy, J. J. 1981. A prosodic theory of non-concatenative morphology. Linguistic Inquiry 12. 373–418Google Scholar
McCawley, J. D. 1999. Why surface syntactic structure reflects logical structure as much as it does, but only that much. Language 75. 34–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGurk, H. and MacDonald, J.. 1976. Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature 264. 746–748CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Medawar, P. 1967. The art of the soluble. London: Methuen
Monrad-Kröhn, G. H. 1947. Dysprosody or altered “melody of language”. Brain 70. 405–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris Jones, J. 1913. A Welsh grammar. Oxford: Clarendon
Mustanoja, T. 1960. A Middle English syntax. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique
Nash, D. 1986. Topics in Warlpiri grammar. New York: Garland
Nespor, M. and I. Vogel. 1986. Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris
Newmeyer, F. J. 1998. Language form and language function. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Newport, E. L. 1999. Reduced input in the acquisition of signed languages: contributions to the study of creolization. In DeGraff 1999. 161–178
Niyogi, P. 2002. The computational study of diachronic linguistics. In Lightfoot 2002. 351–65
Niyogi, P. and Berwick, R.. 1997. A dynamical systems model for language change. Complex Systems 11. 161–204Google Scholar
Nunes, J. 1995. Linearization of chains and sideward movement. PhD thesis. University of Maryland. College Park, MD
Nunnally, T. 1985. The syntax of the genitive in Old, Middle, and Early Modern English. PhD thesis. University of Georgia
Ojemann, G., Ojemann, J., Lettich, E. and Berger, M.. 1989. Cortical language organization in left, dominant hemisphere. Journal of Neurosurgery 71. 316–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neil, W. 1978. The evolution of the Germanic inflectional systems: a study in the causes of language change. Orbis 27. 248–285Google Scholar
Orešnik, J. and Pétursson, M.. 1977. Quantity in modern Icelandic. Arkiv för Nordisk Filologi 92. 155–171Google Scholar
Paradis, C. and LaCharité, D.. 1997. Preservation and minimality in loanword adaptation. Journal of Linguistics 33. 379–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, H. 1880. Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte. Tübingen: Niemeyer
Payne, D. L. 1998. Maasai gender in typological and applied perspective. Read at 29th Annual Conference on African Linguistics, Yale University
Pepperberg, I. M. 2000. The Alex studies: cognitive and communicative abilities of grey parrots. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Perlmutter, D. M. 1991. The language of the Deaf. New York Review of Books 38(6). 65–72. [Review of Sacks 1989.]Google Scholar
Petitto, L. A. and Marentette, P. F.. 1991. Babbling in the manual mode: evidence for the ontogeny of language. Science. 251. 1493–1496CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petitto, L. and Seidenberg, M.. 1979. On the evidence for linguistic abilities in signing apes. Brain and Language 8. 162–183CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, C. 2001. Levels of representation in the electrophysiology of speech perception. Cognitive Science 25. 711–731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, J. and B. Inhelder. 1968. The psychology of the child. London: Routledge
Piattelli-Palmarini, M., ed. 1980. Language and learning: the debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul
Piattelli-Palmarini, M., ed. 1986. The rise of selective theories: a case study and some lessons from immunology. In Language learning and concept acquisition: foundational issues, ed. by W. Demopoulos and A. Marras. 117–130. Norwood, NJ: Ablex
Piattelli-Palmarini, M.. 1989. Evolution, selection, and cognition: from “learning” to parameter setting in biology and the study of language. Cognition 31. 1–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierce, A. 1992. Language acquisition and syntactic theory: a comparative analysis of French and English child grammars. Dordrecht: Kluwer
Pierrehumbert, J. 1990. Phonological and phonetic representation. Journal of Phonetics 18. 375–394Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J. and D. Talkin. 1992. Lenition of /h/ and glottal stop. In Docherty and Ladd 1992. 90–117
Pinker, S. 1994. The language instinct. New York: William Morrow
Poeppel, D. 1996. A critical review of PET studies of phonological processing. Brain and Language 55. 317–351CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poeppel, D. and A. Marantz. 2000. Cognitive neuroscience of speech processing. In Marantz et al. 2000. 29–50
Poeppel, D. and Wexler, K.. 1993. The full competence hypothesis of clause structure in early German. Language 69. 1–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poizner, H., E. S. Klima and U. Bellugi. 1987. What the hands reveal about the brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Premack, D. 1978. Chimpanzee problem-solving: a test for comprehension. Science 202. 532–535CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Premack, D. 1980. Representational capacity and accessibility of knowledge: the case of chimpanzees. In Piattelli-Palmarini 1980. 205–221
Premack, D. 1990. Words: What are they, and do animals have them?Cognition 37. 197–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prince, A. and P. Smolensky. 1993. Optimality theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. Manuscript, Rutgers University and University of Colorado
Purves, D., G. J. Augustine, D. Fitzpatrick, L. C. Katz, A.-S. LaMantia and J. O. McNamara, eds. 1997. Neuroscience. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer
Rask, R. K. 1818. UndersØgelse om det gamle Nordisk eller Islandske sprogs oprindelse. Copenhagen: Gyldendals
Reinhart, T. 1976. The syntactic domain of anaphora. PhD thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Rizzi, L. 1982. Violations of the wh-island constraint and the subjacency condition. In Issues in Italian syntax, ed. by L. Rizzi. 49–76. Dordrecht: Foris
Rizzi, L. 1990. Relativized minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Roberts, I. 1993. A formal account of grammaticalization in the history of Romance futures. Folia Linguistica Historica 13. 219–258Google Scholar
Ross, J. R. 1967. On the cyclic nature of English pronominalization. To honor Roman Jakobson. The Hague: Mouton
Ross, J. R. 1969. Auxiliaries as main verbs. In Studies in philosophical linguistics, ed. by W. Todd. Vol. I. Evanston: Great Expectations
Rugg, M. D. 1999. Functional neuroimaging in cognitive neuroscience. In Brown and Hagoort 1999. 15–36
Sacks, O. 1989. Seeing voices. Berkeley: University of California Press
Sapir, Edward. 1921. Language. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World
Sapir, Edward 1925. Sound patterns in language. Language 1. 37–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapir, Edward 1929. The status of linguistics as a science. Language 5. 207–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapir, Edward 1938. Why cultural anthropology needs the psychiatrist. Psychiatry 1. 7–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapir, Edward. 1994. The psychology of culture. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Reconstructed and edited by Judith T. Irvine
Savage-Rumbaugh, E. S. 1986. Ape language: from conditioned response to symbol. New York: Columbia University Press
Savage-Rumbaugh, E. S. 1987. Communication, symbolic communication, and language: reply to Seidenberg & Petitto. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 116. 288–292CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Savage-Rumbaugh, E. S., McDonald, K., Sevcick, R. A., Hopkins, W. D. and Rupert, E.. 1986. Spontaneous symbol acquisition and and communicative use by pygmy chimpanzees (Pan Paniscus). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 115. 211–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savage-Rumbaugh, E. S., McDonald, K., Sevcick, R. A., Hopkins, W. D. and Rupert, E. 1993. Language comprehension in ape and child. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 58. 1–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savage-Rumbaugh, E. S., S. G. Shanker and T. J. Taylor. 1998. Apes, language, and the human mind. New York: Oxford University Press
Schleicher, A. 1848. ϋber die Bedeutung der Sprache für die Naturgeschichte des Menschen. Weimar: Hermann-Böhlau
Schleicher, A. 1861–62. Compendium der vergleichenden Grammatik der indogermanischen Sprachen. Weimar: Hermann-Böhlau
Schleicher, A. 1863. Die Darwinische Theorie und die Sprachwissenschaft. Weimar: Hermann-Böhlau
Seidenberg, M. and Petitto, L.. 1987. Communication, symbolic communication, and language: comment on Savage-Rumbaugh et al.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 116. 279–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaywitz, B., Shaywitz, S., Pugh, K., Constable, T., Skudlasrski, P., Fulbright, R., Bronen, R., Fletcher, J., Shankweiler, D., Katz, L. and Gore, J.. 1995. Sex differences in the functional organization for language. Nature 373. 607–609CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shlonsky, U. 1988. Complementizer cliticization in Hebrew and the ECP. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6. 191–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sieratzki, J. and B. Woll. in press. Toddling into language: precocious language development in motor-impaired children with spinal muscular atrophy. Lingua
Sievers, E. 1881. Grundzüge der Phonetik. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Hartel
Smith, N. V. in press. Dissociation and modularity. In Mind, brain and language: multidisciplinary perspectives, ed. by M. T. Banich and M. Mack. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Smith, N. V. and I. M. Tsimpli. 1995. The mind of a savant: language-learning and modularity. Oxford: Blackwell
Solan, L. 1983. Pronominal reference: child language and the theory of grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel
Sperry, R. 1968. Plasticity of neural maturation. Developmental Biology Supplement 2. 306–27Google Scholar
Stevens, K. and M. Halle. 1967. Remarks on analysis by synthesis and distinctive features. In Models for the perception of speech and visual form, ed. by W. Whaten-Dunn. 88–102. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Supalla, S. 1990. Segmentation of manually coded English: problems in the mapping of English in the visual/gestural mode. PhD thesis. University of Illinois
Tavakolian, S. 1978. Children's comprehension of pronominal subjects and missing subjects in complicated sentences. University of Massachusetts occasional papers 4: Papers in the structure and development of child language, ed. by H. Goodluck and L. Solan. 37–83. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Graduate Student Linguistic Association
Terrace, H. S., Pettito, L. A., Sanders, R. J. and Bever, T. G.. 1979. Can an ape create a sentence?Science 206. 891–902CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thornton, R. 1994. Children's negative questions: a production/comprehension asymmetry. In Proceedings of Eastern States Conference on Linguistics 1994, ed. by J. Fuller, H. Han and D. Parkinson. 306–317. Ithaca: Cornell University Department of Linguistics
Thornton, R. 1995. Referentiality and wh-movement in child English: juvenile dlinkuency. Language Acquisition 4. 139–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomblin, J. B. 1997. Epidemiology of specific language impairment. In The inheritance and innateness of grammars, ed. by M. Gopnik. 91–110. New York: Oxford University Press
Trubetzkoy, N. S. 1939. Grundzüge der Phonologie. Travaux du cercle linguistique de Prague
Uylings, H. B. M., L. I. Malofeeva, I. N. Bogolepova, K. Amunts and K. Zilles. 1999. Broca's language area from a neuroanatomical and developmental perspective. In Brown & Hagoort 1999. 319–336
Lely, H. K. J. 1996. Specifically language impaired and normally developing children: verbal passive vs. adjectival passive sentence interpretation. Lingua 98. 243–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Gelderen, E. 1997. Verbal agreement and the grammar behind its “breakdown”: minimalist feature checking. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer
Vennemann, T. 1975. An explanation of drift. In Word order and word order change, ed. by C. N. Li. 269–302. Austin: University of Texas Press
Wallman, J. 1992. Aping language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Warner, A. R. 1995. Predicting the progressive passive: parametric change within a lexicalist framework. Language 71. 533–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, A. R. 1997. The structure of parametric change and V movement in the history of English. In Parameters of morphosyntactic change, ed. by A. van Kemenade and N. Vincent. 380–393. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Watkins, C. 1976. Toward Proto-Indo-European syntax: problems and pseudo-problems. In Diachronic syntax, ed. by S. Steever, C. Walker and S. Mufwene. 305–326. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society
Weverink, M. 1989. The subject in relation to inflection in child language. Master's thesis. Utrecht University
Wexler, K. 1994. Optional infinitives, head movement, and the economy of derivations. In Verb movement, ed. by D. W. Lightfoot and N. Hornstein. 305–350. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Wexler, K., Rice, M. and Cleave, P.. 1995. Specific language impairment as a period of extended optional infinitives. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 38. 850–863Google Scholar
Williams, H. and Nottebohm, F.. 1985. Auditory responses in avian vocal motor neurons: a motor theory for song perception in birds. Science 229. 279–282CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, J. 1910. Grammar of the Gothic language. Oxford: Clarendon
Yang, C. D. 2002. Grammar competition and language change. In Lightfoot 2002. 367–380
Zwicky, A. M. and Pullum, G. K.. 1983. Cliticization vs. inflection: English n't.Language 59. 502–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, C. 1997. Investigating the origins of the “group genitive” in English. Transactions of the Philological Society 95. 111–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, C. 2002. Case and Middle English genitive noun phrases. In Lightfoot 2002. 57–80
Anderson, S. R. 1974. The organization of phonology. New York: Academic Press
Anderson, S. R. 1976. On the description of consonant gradation in Fula. Studies in African Linguistics 7. 93–136Google Scholar
Anderson, S. R. 1978. Syllables, segments and the northwest Caucasian languages. In Syllables and segments, ed. by A. Bell and J. B. Hooper. 47–58. Amsterdam: North-Holland
Anderson, S. R. 1981. Why phonology isn't “natural.” Linguistic Inquiry 12. 493–539Google Scholar
Anderson, S. R. 1985. Phonology in the twentieth century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Anderson, S. R. 1988. Objects (direct and not so direct) in English and other languages. In On language: a Festschrift for Robert Stockwell, ed. by C. Duncan-Rose, T. Vennemann and J. Fisiak. 279–306. Beckenham, Kent: Croom-Helm
Anderson, S. R. 1990. The grammar of Icelandic verbs in -st. In Icelandic syntax, ed. by J. Maling and A. Zaenen. Syntax & Semantics 24. 235–273. New York: Academic Press
Anderson, S. R. 1992. A-morphous morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Anderson, S. R. 1993. Linguistic expression and its relation to modality. In Current issues in ASL phonology, ed. by G. R. Coulter. Phonetics and Phonology 3. San Diego: Academic Press
Anderson, S. R. 2000. Reflections on “on the phonetic rules of Russian.” Folia Linguistica 34. 1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, S. R. forthcoming. Doctor Dolittle's delusion: animal communication and the nature of human language
Anderson, S. R. and Lightfoot, D. W.. 1999. The human language faculty as an organ. Annual Review of Physiology 62. 697–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersson, A-B. and Dahl, O.. 1974. Against the penthouse principle. Linguistic Inquiry 5. 451–454Google Scholar
Aronoff, M. 1976. Word formation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Aronoff, M. 1988. Two senses of lexical. Proceedings of the Eastern States Conference on Linguistics 5. 13–23Google Scholar
Baker, M. 2001. The atoms of language. New York: Basic Books
Barbosa, P., D. Fox, P. Hagstrom, M. McGinnis and D. Pesetsky, eds. 1998. Is the best good enough? Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Barbour, J. 2000. The end of time. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Bates, E. A. and Elman, J. L.. 1996. Learning rediscovered. Science 274. 1849–1850CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bauer, L. 1995. The emergence and development of SVO patterning in Latin and French. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Bazell, C. E. 1952. The correspondence fallacy in structural linguistics. Studies by Members of the English Department, Istanbul University 3. 1–41Google Scholar
Beard, R. 1995. Lexeme-morpheme base morphology: a general heory of inflection and word formation. Albany: SUNY Press
Beckman, M., J. Edwards and J. Fletcher. 1992. Prosodic structure and tempo in a sonority model of articulatory dynamics. In Docherty and Ladd 1992. 68–86
Bellugi, U., S. Marks, A. Bihrle and H. Sabo. 1993. Dissociation between language and cognitive functions in Williams Syndrome. In Language development in exceptional circumstances, ed. by D. Bishop and K. Mogford. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Berthier, M. L., Rutz, A., Massone, M. I., Starkstein, S. E. and Leiguarda, R. C.. 1991. Foreign accent syndrome: behavioral and anatomical findings in recovered and non-recovered patients. Aphasiology 5. 129–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickerton, D. 1984. The language bioprogram hypothesis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7. 173–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickerton, D. 1999. How to acquire language without positive evidence: what acquisitionists can learn from creoles. In DeGraff 1999. 49–74
Bishop, D. V. M. 1997. Uncommon understanding: development and disorders of language comprehension in children. London: Psychology
Bittner, M. 1987. On the semantics of the Greenlandic antipassive and related constructions. International Journal of American Linguistics 53. 194–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, B. 1994. Case. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Bloch, B. 1941. Phonemic overlapping. American Speech 16. 278–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, L. 1933. Language. New York: Holt
Bloomfield, L. 1939. Menomini morphophonemics. Travaux du cercle linguistique de Prague 8. 105–115Google Scholar
Bloomfield, L. 1962. The Menomini language. New Haven: Yale University Press. [Charles F. Hockett, ed.]
Blumstein, S. E., Alexander, M. P., Ryalls, J. H., Katz, W. and Dworetzky, B.. 1987. On the nature of the foreign accent syndrome: a case study. Brain and Language 31. 215–244CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boas, F., ed. 1911. Handbook of American Indian languages. Bulletin 40, part I. Bureau of American Ethnology
Boatman, D., Gordon, B., Stone, M. and Anderson, S.. 1994. Studies of articulatory timing in normal and foreign accent syndrome speech. Brain and Language 47. 549–552Google Scholar
Borer, H. and K. Wexler. 1987. The maturation of syntax. In Parameter setting, ed. by T. Roeper and E. Williams. 123–172. Dordrecht: Reidel
Bowerman, M. F. 1973. Structural relationships in children's utterances: syntactic or semantic? In Cognitive development and the acquisition of language, ed. by T. E. Moore. New York: Academic Press
Boyce, S. E., Krakow, R. A. and Bell-Berti, F.. 1991. Phonological underspecification and speech motor organization. Phonology 8. 219–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brentari, D. 1995. Sign language phonology: ASL. In The handbook of phonological theory, ed. by J. A. Goldsmith. 615–639. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell
Briscoe, E. 2000. Grammatical acquisition: innovative bias and coevolution of language and the language acquisition device. Language 76. 245–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broe, M. B. and J. B. Pierrehumbert. 2000. Papers in laboratory phonology vol. V: Acquisition and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Browman, C. and Goldstein, L.. 1990a. Gestural specification using dynamically-defined articulatory structures. Journal of Phonetics 18. 299–320Google Scholar
Browman, C. and L. Goldstein. 1990b. Tiers in articulatory phonology, with some implications for casual speech. In Kingston and Beckman 1990. 341–346
Browman, C. and Goldstein, L.. 1992a. Articulatory phonology: an overview. Phonetica 49. 155–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browman, C. and L. Goldstein. 1992b. Targeted and targetless schwas. Paper presented at International Phonologietagung, Krems, Austria
Browman, C. and L. Goldstein. 1992c. “Targetless” schwa: an articulatory analysis. In Docherty and Ladd 1992. 26–56
Browman, C. and L. Goldstein. 1998. Competing constraints on intergestural coordination and self-organization of phonological structures. Read at Current Trends in Phonology, II, Royaumont, France
Browman, C. P., L. M. Goldstein, D. N. Honoroff, A. Jebbour and E. Selkirk. 1998. Gestural organizations underlying syllable structure in Tashlhiyt Berber. Read at Current Trends in Phonology, II, Royaumont, France
Brown, C. M. and P. Hagoort, eds. 1999. The neurocognition of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Byrd, D., A. Kaun, S. Narayanan and E. Saltzman. 2000. Phrasal signatures in articulation. In Broe and Pierrehumbert. 70–87
Byrd, D. and Saltzman, E.. 1998. Intragestural dynamics of multiple prosodic boundaries. Journal of Phonetics 26. 173–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caplan, D. 1987. Neurolinguistics and linguistic aphasiology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Carbary, T. J., Patterson, J. P. and Snyder, P. J.. 2000. Foreign accent syndrome following a catastrophic second injury: MRI correlates, linguistic and voice pattern analyses. Brain and Cognition 43. 78–85Google ScholarPubMed
Choi, J. D. 1992. Phonetic underspecification and target interpolation: an acoustic study of Marshallese vowel allophony. Working Papers in Phonetics 82. Los Angeles: Phonetics Laboratory, UCLA
Chomsky, N. 1959. Review of B. F. Skinner, Verbal Behavior. Language 35. 547–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1964. The logical basis of linguistic theory. Proceedings of the ninth international congress of linguists, Cambridge, MA, August 27–31, 1962, ed. by H. G. Lunt. 914–978. The Hague: Mouton
Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Chomsky, N. 1975. Reflections on language. New York: Pantheon
Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris
Chomsky, N. 1986. Knowledge of language. New York: Praeger
Chomsky, N. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Chomsky, N. 2000. New horizons in the study of language and mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Chomsky, N. and M. Halle. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row
Clahsen, H. and Almazan, M.. 1998. Syntax and morphology in Williams Syndrome. Cognition 68. 167–198CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clahsen, H., Bartke, S. and Gollner, S.. 1997. Formal features in impaired grammars: a comparison of English and German SLI children. Essex Research Reports in Linguistics 14. 42–75Google Scholar
Clark, R. 1992. The selection of syntactic knowledge. Language Acquisition 2. 83–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulter, G. R. ed. 1993. Current issues in ASL Phonology. Phonetics and Phonology 3. San Diego, CA: Academic Press
Crain, S. 1991. Language acquisition in the absence of experience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14. 597–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crain, S. and C. McKee. 1986. The acquisition of structural restrictions on anaphora. In Proceedings of North Eastern Linguistics Society 16, ed. by I. S. Berman, J. Choe and J. McDonough. 94–110. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts, GLSA
Crain, S. and R. Thornton. 1998. Investigations in Universal Grammar: a guide to experiments on the acquisition of syntax and semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Culicover, P. 1997. Principles and parameters: an introduction to syntactic theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Curtiss, S. 1988. Abnormal language acquisition and the modularity of language. In Linguistics: the Cambridge survey, ed. by F. J. Newmeyer. Vol. II. 96–116. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Darnell, R. 1990. Edward Sapir. Berkeley: University of California Press
Darwin, C. 1874. The descent of man. New York: Appleton. [Second edition, 1889.]
Dawkins, R. 1976. The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press
de Boysson-Bardies, B. 1999. How language comes to children. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
de Saussure, F. 1879. Mémoire sur le système primitif des voyelles dans les langues indo-européennes. Leipzig: Tübner
de Saussure, F. 1974. Cours de linguistique générale. critical edn. Paris: Payot. [Prepared by Tullio de Mauro.]
DeGraff, M., ed. 1999. Language creation and change: creolization, diachrony and development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Dekkers, J., F. van der Leeuw and J. van deWeijer, eds. 2000. Optimality theory: phonology, syntax and acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press
deVilliers, J. and P. deVilliers. 1985. The acquisition of English. In The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, ed. by D. Slobin. 27–139. Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Di Sciullo, A-M. and E. Williams. 1987. On the definition of word. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Dobzhansky, T. 1970. Genetics of the evolutionary process. New York: Columbia University Press
Docherty, G. J. and D. R. Ladd, eds. 1992. Papers in laboratory phonology, Vol. II: Gesture, segment, prosody. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Dresher, B. E. 1999. Charting the learning path: cues to parameter setting. Linguistic Inquiry 30. 27–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dresher, B. E. and Idsardi, W.. 1999. Prerequisites for a theory of diachronic adaptation. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 18. 212–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumézil, G. 1975. Le verbe oubykh: études descriptives et comparatives. Mémoires de l'Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-lettres 1. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale
Edwards, S. and Bastiaanse, R.. 1998. Diversity in the lexical and syntactic abilities of fluent aphasic speakers. Aphasiology 12(2). 99–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekwall, E. 1943. Studies on the genitive of groups in English. Lund: Gleerup
Engdahl, E. 1985. Parasitic gaps, resumptive pronouns, and subject extractions. Linguistics 23. 3–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finger, S. 2000. Minds behind the brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Flourens, M.-J.-P. 1824. Récherche expérimentale sur les propriétés et les fonctions du système nerveux dans les animaux vertébrés. Paris: Ballières
Flourens, M.-J.-P. 1846. Phrenology examined. Philadelphia: Hogan & Thompson. Translated from the 2nd French edition (1842) by C. de L. Meigs
Fodor, J. D. 1998. Unambiguous triggers. Linguistic Inquiry 29. 1–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, C. A. 1990. Some regularities of speech are not consequences of formal rules: Comments on Keating's paper. In Kingston and Beckman 1990. 476–489
Friedmann, N. and Grodzinsky, Y.. 1997. Tense and agreement in agrammatic production: pruning the syntactic tree. Brain and Language 56. 397–425CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frith, U. 1991. Autism and Asperger Syndrome. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Fujimura, O. 1994. C/D model: a computational model of phonetic implementation. In Language computations, ed. by E. S. Ristad. 1–20. American Mathematical Society
Gardner, R. A. and Gardner, B. T.. 1969. Teaching sign language to a chimpanzee. Science 165. 664–672CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gazzaniga, M. S. 1996. Conversations in the cognitive neurosciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Gibson, E. and Wexler, K.. 1994. Triggers. Linguistic Inquiry 25. 407–454Google Scholar
Gleitman, L. and E. Wanner. 1982. Introduction. In Language acquisition: the state of the art, ed. by E. Wanner and L. Gleitman. 3–48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Goldin-Meadow, S. and Mylander, C.. 1990. Beyond the input given: the child's role in the acquisition of language. Language 66. 323–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gopnik, M. 1990. Feature blindness: a case study. Language Acquisition 1(2). 139–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gopnik, M. 1997. Language deficits and genetic factors. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1. 5–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gopnik, M. and Crago, M.. 1991. Familial aggregation of a developmental language disorder. Cognition 39. 1–50CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graff-Radford, N. R., Cooper, W. E., Colsher, P. L. and Damasio, A. R.. 1986. An unlearned foreign “accent” in a patient with aphasia. Brain and Language 28. 86–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, J. H. 1963. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Universals of language, ed. by J. H. Greenberg. 73–112. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Grimm, J. 1848. Geschichte der deutschen Sprache. Vol. I. Leipzig: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung
Grimshaw, J. 1990. Argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Grodzinsky, Y. 2000. The neurology of syntax: language use without Broca's area. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23. 1–21CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guy, G. R. 1991a. Contextual conditioning in variable lexical phonology. Language Variation and Change 3. 223–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guy, G. R. 1991b. Explanation in variable phonology: an exponential model of morphological constraints. Language Variation and Change 3. 1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagoort, P., C. M. Brown and L. Osterhaut. 1999. The neurocognition of syntactic processing. In Brown and Hagoort 1999. 273–316
Hale, K. 1976. The adjoined relative clause in Australia. In Grammatical categories in Australian languages, ed. by R. M. W. Dixon. 78–105. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies
Halle, M. 1957. On the phonetic rules of Russian. Unpublished paper read to the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Chicago
Halle, M. 1959. The sound pattern of Russian. The Hague: Mouton
Hamburger, H. and Crain, S.. 1984. Acquisition of cognitive compiling. Cognition 17. 85–136CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, Z. 1951. Methods in structural linguistics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Haspelmath, M. 1999a. Are there principles of grammatical change?Journal of Linguistics 35. 579–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, M. 1999b. Optimality and diachronic adaptation. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 18. 180–205Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. 1999c. Why is grammaticalization irreversible?Linguistics 37. 1043–1068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauser, M. D. and M. Konishi, eds. 1999. The design of animal communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Herbert of Cherbury. 1624/1937. De veritate. University of Bristol Studies Number 6. Translated by M. H. Carré
Hickok, G. and Poeppel, D.. 2000. Towards a functional neuroanatomy of speech perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4. 131–138CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hockett, C. F. 1947. Problems of morphemic analysis. Language 23. 321–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoenigswald, H. 1963. On the history of the comparative method. Anthropological Linguistics 5. 1–11Google Scholar
Hombert, J.-M. 1976. Consonant types, vowel height and tone in Yoruba. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 33. 40–54Google Scholar
Hopper, P. J. and E. Traugott. 1993. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Hornstein, N. and D. Lightfoot. 1981. Introduction. In Explanation in linguistics: the logical problem of language acquisition, ed. by N. Hornstein and D. Lightfoot. 9–31. London: Longman
Householder, F. W. 1965. On some recent claims in phonological theory. Journal of Linguistics 1. 13–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hovav, M. R. and B. Levin. 1992. -er nominals: implications for the theory of argument structure. In Syntax and the lexicon, ed. by T. Stowell and E. Wehrli. Syntax & Semantics 26. 127–153. San Diego: Academic Press
Hubel, D. 1978. Vision and the brain. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 31(7). 28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubel, D. and Wiesel, T.. 1962. Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. Journal of Physiology 160. 106–154CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hughes, H. C. 1999. Sensory exotica. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Ingham, R. 1998. Tense without agreement in early clause structure. Language Acquisition 7. 51–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R. S. 1975. Morphological and semantic regularities in the lexicon. Language 51. 639–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R. S. 1983. Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Jackendoff, R. S. 1990. Semantic structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Jackendoff, R. S. 1994. Patterns in the mind. New York: Basic Books
Jaeger, J. J., Lockwood, A. H., Kemmerer, D. L., Valin, R. D., Murphy, B. W. and Khalak, H. G.. 1996. A positron emission tomography study of regular and irregular verb morphology in English. Language 72. 451–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janda, R. D. 2001. Beyond “pathways” and “unidirectionality”: On the discontinuity of language transmission and the counterability of grammaticalization. Language Sciences 23. 265–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, O. 1909. Progress in language. London: Swan Sonnenschein. [Second edition.]
Joanisse, M. and Seidenberg, M.. 1998. Specific language impairment: a deficit in grammar or processing?Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2. 240–247CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, K., Flemming, E. and Wright, R.. 1993. The hyperspace effect: phonetic targets are hyperarticulated. Language 69. 505–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joseph, B. 2001. Is there such a thing as grammaticalization?Language Sciences 23. 163–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jusczyk, P. 1997. The discovery of spoken language. Cambridge: MIT Press
Kagaya, R. 1971. Laryngeal gestures in Korean stop consonants. Annual Bulletin, Research Institute of Logopedics and Phoniatrics, University of Tokyo 5. 15–23Google Scholar
Keating, P. 1988. Underspecification in phonetics. Phonology 5. 275–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kegl, J. A., A. Senghas and M. Coppola. 1999. Creation through contact: sign language emergence and sign language change in Nicaragua. In DeGraff 1999. 179–237
Keller, E. 1987. The cortical representation of motor processes of speech. In Motor and sensory processes of language, ed. by E. Keller and M. Gopnik. 125–162. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Kenstowicz, M. 1994. Phonology in generative grammar. Cambridge: Blackwell
Kingston, J. and M. Beckman, eds. 1990. Papers in laboratory phonology, Vol. I: Between the grammar and the physics of speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Kingston, J. and Diehl, R. L.. 1994. Phonetic knowledge. Language 70. 419–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, P. 1982. Word formation and the lexicon. In Proceedings of the 1982 Mid-America linguistics conference, ed. by F. Ingemann. 3–29. Lawrence: University of Kansas
Kiparsky, P. 1984. On the lexical phonology of Icelandic. In Nordic prosody, Vol. III, ed. by C.-C. Elert, I. Johansson and E. Strangert. 135–164. Stockholm: University of Umeå (Almqvist and Wiksell)
Kiparsky, P. 1993. Variable rules. Unpublished paper read at Rutgers Optimality Workshop
Kiparsky, P. 1996. The shift to head-initial VP in Germanic. In Studies in comparative Germanic syntax, ed. by H. Thráinsson, S. J. Epstein and S. Peters. 140–179. Dordrecht: Kluwer
Kisseberth, C. 1970a. On the functional unity of phonological rules. Linguistic Inquiry 1. 291–306Google Scholar
Kisseberth, C. 1970b. Vowel elision in Tonkawa and derivational constraints. In Studies presented to Robert B. Lees by his students, ed. by J. Sadock and A. Vanek. 109–138. Edmonton: Linguistic Research
Klima, E. and U. Bellugi. 1979. The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Kosslyn, S. M., M. S. Gazzaniga, A. M. Galaburda and C. Rabin. 1999. Hemispheric specialization. In Fundamental neuroscience, ed. by M. J. Zigmond, F. E. Bloom, S. C. Landis, J. L. Roberts and L. R. Squire. 1521–1542. San Diego: Academic Press
Kroch, A. 1989. Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change 1. 199–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroodsma, D. E. and E. H. Miller, eds. 1996. Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
Kuhl, P. K. 1999. Speech, language and the brain: innate preparation for learning. In Hauser and Konishi 1999. 419–450
Kuipers, A. H. 1960. Phoneme and morpheme in Kabardian. The Hague: Mouton
Kurowski, K. M., Blumstein, S. E. and Alexander, M.. 1996. The foreign accent syndrome: a reconsideration. Brain and Language 54. 1–25CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kutas, M., K. D. Federmeier and M. I. Sereno. 1999. Current approaches to mapping language in electromagnetic space. In Brown and Hagoort 1999. 359–392
Lakoff, R. T. 1972. Another look at drift. In Linguistic change and generative theory, ed. by R. P. Stockwell and R. Macauley. 172–198. Bloomington: Indiana University Press
Langacker, R. W. 1969. Pronominalization and the chain of command. In Modern studies in English, ed. by D. Reibel and S. Schane. 160–186. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
Lasnik, H. 1999. Minimalist analysis. Oxford: Blackwell
Lass, R. 1980. On explaining linguistic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Lass, R. 1997. Historical linguistics and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Laughren, M. 1988. Toward a lexical representation of Warlpiri verbs. In Thematic relations, ed. by W. Wilkins. Syntax and Semantics 21. 215–242. San Diego: Academic Press
Lefebvre, C. 1998. Creole genesis and the acquisition of grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Lehiste, I. 1970. Suprasegmentals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Levy, Y. and Kavé, G.. 1999. Language breakdown and linguistic theory: a tutorial overview. Lingua 107. 95–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, A. M. and Mattingly, I. G.. 1985. The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition 21. 1–36CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lieberman, P. 2000. Human language and our reptilian brain: the subcortical bases of speech, syntax and thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Lightfoot, D. W. 1989. The child's trigger experience: Degree-0 learnability. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12. 321–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, D. W. 1991. How to set parameters: arguments from language change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Lightfoot, D. W. 1994. Degreed-0 learnability. In Syntactic theory and first language acquisition: crosslinguistic perspectives, ed. by B. Lust, G. Hermon and J. Kornfilt. Vol. II. 453–171. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Lightfoot, D. W. 1999. The development of language: acquisition, change and evolution. Oxford: Blackwell
Lightfoot, D. W. ed. 2002. Syntactic effects of morphological change. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Lindblom, B. 1990. Explaining phonetic variation: a sketch of the H and H theory. In Speech production and speech modelling, ed. by W. J. Hardcastle and A. Marchal. 403–439. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic
Locke, J. 1993. The child's path to spoken language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
MacDonnell, A. 1916. A Vedic grammar for students. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Manzini, R. and Wexler, K.. 1987. Parameters, binding theory, and learnability. Linguistic Inquiry 18. 413–444Google Scholar
Marantz, A., Y. Miyashita and W. O'Neil, eds. 2000. Image, language, brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Marchand, H. 1969. The categories and types of present-day English word formation. München: Beck. [Second edition.]
Marler, P. 1970. Birdsong and human speech: could there be parallels?American Scientist 58. 669–674Google ScholarPubMed
Marler, P. 1991. Song-learning behavior: the interface with neuroethology. Trends in Neurosciences 14. 199–206CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marler, P. 1999. On innateness: are sparrow songs “learned” or “innate”? In Hauser and Konishi 1999. 293–318
Marr, D. 1982. Vision. San Francisco: Freeman
Matthei, E. 1982. The acquisition of prenominal modifier sequences. Cognition 11. 201–332CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matthews, G. H. 1955. A phonemic analysis of a Dakota dialect. International Journal of American Linguistics 21. 56–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattingly, I. G. and M. Studdert-Kennedy, eds. 1991. Modularity and the motor theory of speech perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum
Mayeux, R. and E. R. Kandel. 1991. Disorders of language: the aphasias. In Principles of neural science, ed. by E. Kandel, J. H. Schwartz and T. M. Jessel. 839–851. New York: Elsevier
McCarthy, J. J. 1981. A prosodic theory of non-concatenative morphology. Linguistic Inquiry 12. 373–418Google Scholar
McCawley, J. D. 1999. Why surface syntactic structure reflects logical structure as much as it does, but only that much. Language 75. 34–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGurk, H. and MacDonald, J.. 1976. Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature 264. 746–748CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Medawar, P. 1967. The art of the soluble. London: Methuen
Monrad-Kröhn, G. H. 1947. Dysprosody or altered “melody of language”. Brain 70. 405–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris Jones, J. 1913. A Welsh grammar. Oxford: Clarendon
Mustanoja, T. 1960. A Middle English syntax. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique
Nash, D. 1986. Topics in Warlpiri grammar. New York: Garland
Nespor, M. and I. Vogel. 1986. Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris
Newmeyer, F. J. 1998. Language form and language function. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Newport, E. L. 1999. Reduced input in the acquisition of signed languages: contributions to the study of creolization. In DeGraff 1999. 161–178
Niyogi, P. 2002. The computational study of diachronic linguistics. In Lightfoot 2002. 351–65
Niyogi, P. and Berwick, R.. 1997. A dynamical systems model for language change. Complex Systems 11. 161–204Google Scholar
Nunes, J. 1995. Linearization of chains and sideward movement. PhD thesis. University of Maryland. College Park, MD
Nunnally, T. 1985. The syntax of the genitive in Old, Middle, and Early Modern English. PhD thesis. University of Georgia
Ojemann, G., Ojemann, J., Lettich, E. and Berger, M.. 1989. Cortical language organization in left, dominant hemisphere. Journal of Neurosurgery 71. 316–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neil, W. 1978. The evolution of the Germanic inflectional systems: a study in the causes of language change. Orbis 27. 248–285Google Scholar
Orešnik, J. and Pétursson, M.. 1977. Quantity in modern Icelandic. Arkiv för Nordisk Filologi 92. 155–171Google Scholar
Paradis, C. and LaCharité, D.. 1997. Preservation and minimality in loanword adaptation. Journal of Linguistics 33. 379–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, H. 1880. Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte. Tübingen: Niemeyer
Payne, D. L. 1998. Maasai gender in typological and applied perspective. Read at 29th Annual Conference on African Linguistics, Yale University
Pepperberg, I. M. 2000. The Alex studies: cognitive and communicative abilities of grey parrots. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Perlmutter, D. M. 1991. The language of the Deaf. New York Review of Books 38(6). 65–72. [Review of Sacks 1989.]Google Scholar
Petitto, L. A. and Marentette, P. F.. 1991. Babbling in the manual mode: evidence for the ontogeny of language. Science. 251. 1493–1496CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petitto, L. and Seidenberg, M.. 1979. On the evidence for linguistic abilities in signing apes. Brain and Language 8. 162–183CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, C. 2001. Levels of representation in the electrophysiology of speech perception. Cognitive Science 25. 711–731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, J. and B. Inhelder. 1968. The psychology of the child. London: Routledge
Piattelli-Palmarini, M., ed. 1980. Language and learning: the debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul
Piattelli-Palmarini, M., ed. 1986. The rise of selective theories: a case study and some lessons from immunology. In Language learning and concept acquisition: foundational issues, ed. by W. Demopoulos and A. Marras. 117–130. Norwood, NJ: Ablex
Piattelli-Palmarini, M.. 1989. Evolution, selection, and cognition: from “learning” to parameter setting in biology and the study of language. Cognition 31. 1–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierce, A. 1992. Language acquisition and syntactic theory: a comparative analysis of French and English child grammars. Dordrecht: Kluwer
Pierrehumbert, J. 1990. Phonological and phonetic representation. Journal of Phonetics 18. 375–394Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J. and D. Talkin. 1992. Lenition of /h/ and glottal stop. In Docherty and Ladd 1992. 90–117
Pinker, S. 1994. The language instinct. New York: William Morrow
Poeppel, D. 1996. A critical review of PET studies of phonological processing. Brain and Language 55. 317–351CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poeppel, D. and A. Marantz. 2000. Cognitive neuroscience of speech processing. In Marantz et al. 2000. 29–50
Poeppel, D. and Wexler, K.. 1993. The full competence hypothesis of clause structure in early German. Language 69. 1–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poizner, H., E. S. Klima and U. Bellugi. 1987. What the hands reveal about the brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Premack, D. 1978. Chimpanzee problem-solving: a test for comprehension. Science 202. 532–535CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Premack, D. 1980. Representational capacity and accessibility of knowledge: the case of chimpanzees. In Piattelli-Palmarini 1980. 205–221
Premack, D. 1990. Words: What are they, and do animals have them?Cognition 37. 197–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prince, A. and P. Smolensky. 1993. Optimality theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. Manuscript, Rutgers University and University of Colorado
Purves, D., G. J. Augustine, D. Fitzpatrick, L. C. Katz, A.-S. LaMantia and J. O. McNamara, eds. 1997. Neuroscience. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer
Rask, R. K. 1818. UndersØgelse om det gamle Nordisk eller Islandske sprogs oprindelse. Copenhagen: Gyldendals
Reinhart, T. 1976. The syntactic domain of anaphora. PhD thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Rizzi, L. 1982. Violations of the wh-island constraint and the subjacency condition. In Issues in Italian syntax, ed. by L. Rizzi. 49–76. Dordrecht: Foris
Rizzi, L. 1990. Relativized minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Roberts, I. 1993. A formal account of grammaticalization in the history of Romance futures. Folia Linguistica Historica 13. 219–258Google Scholar
Ross, J. R. 1967. On the cyclic nature of English pronominalization. To honor Roman Jakobson. The Hague: Mouton
Ross, J. R. 1969. Auxiliaries as main verbs. In Studies in philosophical linguistics, ed. by W. Todd. Vol. I. Evanston: Great Expectations
Rugg, M. D. 1999. Functional neuroimaging in cognitive neuroscience. In Brown and Hagoort 1999. 15–36
Sacks, O. 1989. Seeing voices. Berkeley: University of California Press
Sapir, Edward. 1921. Language. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World
Sapir, Edward 1925. Sound patterns in language. Language 1. 37–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapir, Edward 1929. The status of linguistics as a science. Language 5. 207–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapir, Edward 1938. Why cultural anthropology needs the psychiatrist. Psychiatry 1. 7–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapir, Edward. 1994. The psychology of culture. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Reconstructed and edited by Judith T. Irvine
Savage-Rumbaugh, E. S. 1986. Ape language: from conditioned response to symbol. New York: Columbia University Press
Savage-Rumbaugh, E. S. 1987. Communication, symbolic communication, and language: reply to Seidenberg & Petitto. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 116. 288–292CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Savage-Rumbaugh, E. S., McDonald, K., Sevcick, R. A., Hopkins, W. D. and Rupert, E.. 1986. Spontaneous symbol acquisition and and communicative use by pygmy chimpanzees (Pan Paniscus). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 115. 211–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savage-Rumbaugh, E. S., McDonald, K., Sevcick, R. A., Hopkins, W. D. and Rupert, E. 1993. Language comprehension in ape and child. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 58. 1–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savage-Rumbaugh, E. S., S. G. Shanker and T. J. Taylor. 1998. Apes, language, and the human mind. New York: Oxford University Press
Schleicher, A. 1848. ϋber die Bedeutung der Sprache für die Naturgeschichte des Menschen. Weimar: Hermann-Böhlau
Schleicher, A. 1861–62. Compendium der vergleichenden Grammatik der indogermanischen Sprachen. Weimar: Hermann-Böhlau
Schleicher, A. 1863. Die Darwinische Theorie und die Sprachwissenschaft. Weimar: Hermann-Böhlau
Seidenberg, M. and Petitto, L.. 1987. Communication, symbolic communication, and language: comment on Savage-Rumbaugh et al.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 116. 279–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaywitz, B., Shaywitz, S., Pugh, K., Constable, T., Skudlasrski, P., Fulbright, R., Bronen, R., Fletcher, J., Shankweiler, D., Katz, L. and Gore, J.. 1995. Sex differences in the functional organization for language. Nature 373. 607–609CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shlonsky, U. 1988. Complementizer cliticization in Hebrew and the ECP. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6. 191–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sieratzki, J. and B. Woll. in press. Toddling into language: precocious language development in motor-impaired children with spinal muscular atrophy. Lingua
Sievers, E. 1881. Grundzüge der Phonetik. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Hartel
Smith, N. V. in press. Dissociation and modularity. In Mind, brain and language: multidisciplinary perspectives, ed. by M. T. Banich and M. Mack. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Smith, N. V. and I. M. Tsimpli. 1995. The mind of a savant: language-learning and modularity. Oxford: Blackwell
Solan, L. 1983. Pronominal reference: child language and the theory of grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel
Sperry, R. 1968. Plasticity of neural maturation. Developmental Biology Supplement 2. 306–27Google Scholar
Stevens, K. and M. Halle. 1967. Remarks on analysis by synthesis and distinctive features. In Models for the perception of speech and visual form, ed. by W. Whaten-Dunn. 88–102. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Supalla, S. 1990. Segmentation of manually coded English: problems in the mapping of English in the visual/gestural mode. PhD thesis. University of Illinois
Tavakolian, S. 1978. Children's comprehension of pronominal subjects and missing subjects in complicated sentences. University of Massachusetts occasional papers 4: Papers in the structure and development of child language, ed. by H. Goodluck and L. Solan. 37–83. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Graduate Student Linguistic Association
Terrace, H. S., Pettito, L. A., Sanders, R. J. and Bever, T. G.. 1979. Can an ape create a sentence?Science 206. 891–902CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thornton, R. 1994. Children's negative questions: a production/comprehension asymmetry. In Proceedings of Eastern States Conference on Linguistics 1994, ed. by J. Fuller, H. Han and D. Parkinson. 306–317. Ithaca: Cornell University Department of Linguistics
Thornton, R. 1995. Referentiality and wh-movement in child English: juvenile dlinkuency. Language Acquisition 4. 139–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomblin, J. B. 1997. Epidemiology of specific language impairment. In The inheritance and innateness of grammars, ed. by M. Gopnik. 91–110. New York: Oxford University Press
Trubetzkoy, N. S. 1939. Grundzüge der Phonologie. Travaux du cercle linguistique de Prague
Uylings, H. B. M., L. I. Malofeeva, I. N. Bogolepova, K. Amunts and K. Zilles. 1999. Broca's language area from a neuroanatomical and developmental perspective. In Brown & Hagoort 1999. 319–336
Lely, H. K. J. 1996. Specifically language impaired and normally developing children: verbal passive vs. adjectival passive sentence interpretation. Lingua 98. 243–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Gelderen, E. 1997. Verbal agreement and the grammar behind its “breakdown”: minimalist feature checking. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer
Vennemann, T. 1975. An explanation of drift. In Word order and word order change, ed. by C. N. Li. 269–302. Austin: University of Texas Press
Wallman, J. 1992. Aping language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Warner, A. R. 1995. Predicting the progressive passive: parametric change within a lexicalist framework. Language 71. 533–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, A. R. 1997. The structure of parametric change and V movement in the history of English. In Parameters of morphosyntactic change, ed. by A. van Kemenade and N. Vincent. 380–393. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Watkins, C. 1976. Toward Proto-Indo-European syntax: problems and pseudo-problems. In Diachronic syntax, ed. by S. Steever, C. Walker and S. Mufwene. 305–326. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society
Weverink, M. 1989. The subject in relation to inflection in child language. Master's thesis. Utrecht University
Wexler, K. 1994. Optional infinitives, head movement, and the economy of derivations. In Verb movement, ed. by D. W. Lightfoot and N. Hornstein. 305–350. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Wexler, K., Rice, M. and Cleave, P.. 1995. Specific language impairment as a period of extended optional infinitives. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 38. 850–863Google Scholar
Williams, H. and Nottebohm, F.. 1985. Auditory responses in avian vocal motor neurons: a motor theory for song perception in birds. Science 229. 279–282CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, J. 1910. Grammar of the Gothic language. Oxford: Clarendon
Yang, C. D. 2002. Grammar competition and language change. In Lightfoot 2002. 367–380
Zwicky, A. M. and Pullum, G. K.. 1983. Cliticization vs. inflection: English n't.Language 59. 502–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Stephen R. Anderson, Yale University, Connecticut, David W. Lightfoot, Georgetown University, Washington DC
  • Book: The Language Organ
  • Online publication: 03 December 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613869.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Stephen R. Anderson, Yale University, Connecticut, David W. Lightfoot, Georgetown University, Washington DC
  • Book: The Language Organ
  • Online publication: 03 December 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613869.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Stephen R. Anderson, Yale University, Connecticut, David W. Lightfoot, Georgetown University, Washington DC
  • Book: The Language Organ
  • Online publication: 03 December 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613869.012
Available formats
×