Abbi, Anvita. (2006). Reconstructing pre-colonization knowledge-base of ecological environment and sociolinguistic practices of Andamanese. Paper given at the Hunter-Gatherer Workshop, Max Planck Institute of Evolutionary Anthopology, Leipzig, August 2006.Google Scholar

Benjamin, Geoffrey. (1976). Austroasiatic subgroupings and prehistory in the Malay Peninsula. Austroasiatic Studies I: 37–128.Google Scholar

Bernatzik, Hugo A. (2005). The spirits of the yellow leaves. The enigmatic hunter-gatherers of northern Thailand. (Originally 1938 and 1958; new edition by Jørgen Rischel). Bangkok: White Lotus Press.Google Scholar

Boeles, J. J. (1963). Second expedition to the Mrabri of North Thailand. JSS 51, 2: 133–160.Google Scholar

Phong, Nguyên Phú, Dõi, Tr`ân Tr and Ferlus, Michel. (1988). Lexique Vietnamien-Ruc-Français. Paris: Université de Paris VII, Sudestasie.Google Scholar

Oota, H., Pakendorf, B., Weiss, G., et al. (2005). Recent origin and cultural reversion of a hunter-gatherer group. PLoS Biology 3(3): e71.Google Scholar

Rischel, J. (1995). Minor Mlabri: A hunter-gatherer language of northern Indochina. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Publishers.Google Scholar

Rischel, J. (2000). The dialect of Bernatzik’s (1938) ‘Yumbri’ refound? Mon-Khmer Studies 30: 115–122.Google Scholar

Rischel, J. (2005). Preface (p. xi), Introduction (pp. xiii–xxxviii), Appendix (pp. 135–172, i.e. a detailed analysis of Bernatzik’s Mlabri word list of 1938), and Selected Bibliography (pp. 173–175) to Bernatzik 2005.Google Scholar

Watters, David. (2006). Notes on Kusunda grammar: A language isolate of Nepal. Himalayan Linguistics Archive 3:1–182.Google Scholar

Zide, Arlene R. K. and Zide, Norman H.. (1976). Proto-Munda cultural vocabulary: Evidence for early agriculture. Austroasiatic Studies II: 1295–1334.Google Scholar

Bailey, Robert C., Head, Genevieve, Jenike, Mark, Owen, Bruce, Rechtman, Robert, and Zechenter, Elzbieta. (1989). Hunting and gathering in tropical rain forest: Is it possible? American Anthropologist 91(1): 59–82.Google Scholar

Bellwood, Peter. (1979). Man’s conquest of the Pacific: The prehistory of Southeast Asia and Oceania. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bellwood, Peter. (1985). Prehistory of the Indo-Malaysian archipelago. Sydney: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Bellwood, Peter. (1993). Cultural and biological differentiation in Peninsular Malaysia: The last 10,000 years. Asian Perspectives 32: 37–60.Google Scholar

Bellwood, Peter. (1997). Prehistory of the Indo-Malaysian archipelago. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar

Bellwood, Peter. (2004). The origins and dispersals of agricultural communities in Southeast Asia. In Glover, Ian and Bellwood, Peter (eds.), Southeast Asia: From prehistory to history. Abingdon/New York: RoutledgeCurzon, 21–40.Google Scholar

Bellwood, Peter. (2005). Examining the farming/language dispersal hypothesis in the East Asian context. In Sagart, Laurent, Blench, Roger and Sanchez-Mazas, Alicia (eds.), The peopling of East Asia: Putting together archaeology, linguistics and genetics, Abingdon/New York: RoutledgeCurzon, 17–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benjamin, Geoffrey. (1976a). Austroasiatic subgroupings and prehistory in the Malay Peninsula. In Jenner, Philip N., Thompson, Laurence C. and Starosta, Stanley (eds.), Austroasiatic studies, Part I. Honolulu: The University Press of Hawaii, 37–128.Google Scholar

Benjamin, Geoffrey. (1976b). An outline of Temiar grammar. In Jenner, Philip N., Thompson, Laurence C. and Starosta, Stanley (eds.), Austroasiatic studies, Part I. Honolulu: The University Press of Hawaii, 129–188.Google Scholar

Benjamin, Geoffrey. (1985). In the long term: Three themes in Malayan cultural ecology. In Hutterer, Karl L., Terry Rambo, A. and Lovelace, George (eds.), Cultural values and human ecology in Southeast Asia. University of Michigan: Center for South and Southeast Asian Studies, 219–278.Google Scholar

Benjamin, Geoffrey. (1997). Issues in the ethnohistory of Pahang. In Nik Hassan Shuhaimi bin Nik Abd. Rahman, Bakar, Mohamed Mokhtar Abu, Khairuddin, Ahmad Hakimi and Baharuddin, Jazamuddin (eds.), Pembangunan arkeologi pelancongan negeri Pahang. Pekan: Muzium Pahang, 82–121.Google Scholar

Benjamin, Geoffrey. (2001). Orang Asli languages: From heritage to death? In Rashid, Razha and Karim, Wazir Jahan (eds.), Minority cultures of peninsular Malaysia: Survivals of indigenous heritage. Penang: Academy of Social Sciences,101–122.Google Scholar

Benjamin, Geoffrey. (2002). On being tribal in the Malay world. In Benjamin, Geoffrey and Chou, Cynthia (eds.), Tribal communities in the Malay world: Historical, cultural and social perspectives. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 7–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benjamin, Geoffrey. (2004). The Malay world as a regional array. Paper presented at the International Workshop on Scholarship in Malay World Studies: Looking Back, Striding Ahead, Leiden, the Netherlands, 26–28 August, 2004.Google Scholar

Benjamin, Geoffrey. (2012). The Aslian languages of Malaysia and Thailand: An assessment. Language Documentation and Description 11: 136–230.Google Scholar

Bishop, Nancy M. (1996). A preliminary description of Kensiw (Maniq) phonology. Mon-Khmer Studies 25: 227–253.Google Scholar

Bloch, Jules. (1952). L’Andaman. In Cohen, Marcel (ed.), Les langues du monde. Paris: Société linguistique de Paris, 512–521.Google Scholar

Bower, Bruce. (1989). A world that never existed: Re-assessing hunter-gatherers. Science News 135(17): 264–266.Google Scholar

Brenzinger, Matthias (ed.). (1992). Language death: Factual and theoretical explorations with special reference to East Africa. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Bulbeck, F. David. (1996). Holocene biological evolution of the Malay Peninsula aborigines (Orang Asli). Perspectives in Human Biology 2: 37–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bulbeck, F. David. (2003). Hunter-gatherer occupation of the Malay Peninsula from the Ice Age to the Iron Age. In Mercader, J. (ed.), The archaeology of tropical rain forests. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 119–160.Google Scholar

Bulbeck, F. David. (2004a). Indigenous traditions and exogenous influences in the early history of Peninsular Malaysia. In Glover, Ian and Bellwood, Peter (eds.), Southeast Asia: From prehistory to history. London: RoutledgeCurzon, 314–336.Google Scholar

Bulbeck, F. David. (2004b). An integrated perspective on Orang Asli ethnogenesis. In Paz, Victor (ed.), Southeast Asian archaeology: Wilhelm G. Solheim II Festschrift. Quezon City: The University of the Philippines Press, 366–399.Google Scholar

Bulbeck, F. David and Lauer, Adam. (2006). Human variation and evolution in Holocene Peninsular Malaysia. In Oxenham, Marc and Tayles, Nancy (eds.), Bioarchaeology of Southeast Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 133–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burenhult, Niclas. (2005). A grammar of Jahai. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

Burenhult, Niclas. (2006). Body part terms in Jahai. Language Sciences 28: 162–180.Google Scholar

Burenhult, Niclas. (2008). Streams of words: hydrological lexicon in Jahai. Language Sciences 30: 182–199.Google Scholar

Burenhult, Niclas and Wegener, Claudia. (2009). Preliminary notes on the phonology, orthography and vocabulary of Semnam (Austroasiatic, Malay Peninsula). Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society 1: 283–312.Google Scholar

Burenhult, Niclas, Kruspe, Nicole and Dunn, Michael. (2011). Language history and culture groups among Austroasiatic-speaking foragers of the Malay Peninsula. In Enfield, Nick and White, Joyce (eds.), Dynamics of human diversity: The case of mainland Southeast Asia. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics, 257–275.Google Scholar

Carey, Iskandar. (1976). Orang Asli: The aboriginal tribes of Peninsular Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Collins, James T. (ed.). (2006). Borneo and the homeland of the Malays. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.Google Scholar

Cooper, John M. (1940). Andamanese-Semang-Eta cultural relations. Primitive Man 13(2): 29–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dallos, Csilla. (2003). Identity and opportunity: Asymmetrical household integration among the Lanoh, newly sedentary hunter-gatherers and forest collectors of Peninsular Malaysia. Doctoral thesis. McGill University: Department of Anthropology.Google Scholar

Diffloth, Gérard. (1972). Notes on expressive meaning. In Peranteau, P. M., Levi, J. N. and Phares, G. C. (eds.), Papers from the Eighth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 440–447.Google Scholar

Diffloth, Gérard. (1975). Les langues mon-khmer de Malaisie: classification historique et innovations. Asie du sud-est et monde insulinde 6(4): 1–19.Google Scholar

Diffloth, Gérard. (1976). Jah-Hut: An Austroasiatic language of Malaysia. In Liem, Nguyen Dang (ed.), South-east Asian linguistic studies, Vol. 2. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics, 73–118.Google Scholar

Diffloth, Gérard. (1979). Aslian languages and Southeast Asian prehistory. Federation Museums Journal (new series) 24: 2–16.Google Scholar

Diffloth, Gérard. (2005). The contribution of linguistic palaeontology to the homeland of Austro-Asiatic. In Sagart, Laurent, Blench, Roger and Sanchez-Mazas, Alicia (eds.), The peopling of East Asia: Putting together archaeology, linguistics and genetics. Abingdon/New York: RoutledgeCurzon, 77–80.Google Scholar

Diffloth, Gérard and Zide, Norman. (1992). Austro-Asiatic languages. In Bright, William (ed.), International encyclopedia of linguistics, Vol. 1. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, 137–142.Google Scholar

Dorian, Nancy C. (1981). Language death: The life cycle of a Scottish Gaelic dialect. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Dunn, Michael, Burenhult, Niclas, Kruspe, Nicole, Tufvesson, Sylvia and Becker, Neele. (2011). Aslian linguistic prehistory: A case study in computational phylogenetics. Diachronica 28(3): 291–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunn, M., Kruspe, N. and Burenhult, N. (2013). Time and place in the prehistory of the Aslian languages. Human Biology 85: 383–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Endicott, Kirk. (1979). Batek Negrito religion: The world-view and rituals of a hunting and gathering people of Peninsular Malaysia. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

Endicott, Kirk M. and Bellwood, Peter. (1991). The possibility of independent foraging in the rain forest of Peninsular Malaysia. Human Ecology 19(2): 151–185.Google Scholar

Fase, Willem, Jaspaert, Koen and Kroon, Sjaak (eds.). (1992). Maintenance and loss of minority languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Fix, Alan G. (1995). Malayan paleosociology: Implications for patterns of genetic variation among the Orang Asli. American Anthropologist 97(2): 313–323.Google Scholar

Fix, Alan G. (2002). Foragers, farmers, and traders in the Malayan Peninsula: Origins of cultural and biological diversity. In Morrison, Kathleen D. and Junker, Laura L. (eds.), Forager-traders in South and Southeast Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 185–202.Google Scholar

Fix, Alan G. (2011). Origin of genetic diversity among Malaysian Orang Asli: An alternative to the demic diffusion model. In Enfield, Nick and White, Joyce (eds.), Dynamics of human diversity: The case of mainland Southeast Asia. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics, 277–291.Google Scholar

Fucharoen, G., Fucharoen, S. and Horai, S.. (2001). Mitochondrial DNA polymorphisms in Thailand. Journal of Human Genetics 46(3): 115–125.Google Scholar

Gal, Susan. 1979. Language shift: Social determinants of linguistic change in bilingual Austria. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Hamilton, Annette. (2006). Reflections on the ‘disappearing Sakai’: A tribal minority in southern Thailand. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 37(2): 293–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Headland, Thomas N. (1987). The wild yam question: How well could independent hunter-gatherers live in a tropical rain forest ecosystem? Human Ecology 15: 463–491.Google Scholar

Headland, Thomas N. and Bailey, Robert C. (eds.). (1991). Human foragers in tropical rain forests [special issue of Human Ecology 19(2)].Google Scholar

Headland, Thomas N. and Reid, Lawrence A.. (1989). Hunter-gatherers and their neighbors from prehistory to the present. Current Anthropology 30(1): 43–66.Google Scholar

Hill, Catherine, Soares, Pedro, Mormina, Maru, et al.(2006). Phylogeography and ethnogenesis of Aboriginal Southeast Asians. Molecular Biological Evolution 23(12): 2480–2491.Google Scholar

Junker, Laura L. (2002). Southeast Asia: Introduction. In Morrison, Kathleen D. and Junker, Laura L. (eds.), Forager-traders in South and Southeast Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 131–166.Google Scholar

Kruspe, Nicole. (2004). A grammar of Semelai. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kruspe, Nicole. (2009). Loanwords in Ceq Wong, an Austroasiatic language of Peninsular Malaysia. In Haspelmath, Martin and Tadmor, Uri (eds.), Loanwords in the world’s languages: A comparative handbook of lexical borrowing. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 659–685.Google Scholar

Kruspe, Nicole. (2010). A dictionary of Mah Meri, as spoken at Bukit Bangkong. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar

Kruspe, Nicole, Burenhult, Niclas and Wnuk, Ewelina. (2014). Northern Aslian. In Sidwell, Paul and Jenny, Mathias (eds.), Handbook of the Austroasiatic languages. Leiden: Brill, 419–474.Google Scholar

Lye, Tuck-Po. (1997). Knowledge, forest, and hunter-gatherer movement: The Batek of Pahang, Malaysia. Doctoral dissertation. University of Hawai’i: Department of Anthropology.Google Scholar

Lye, Tuck-Po. (2004). Changing pathways: Forest degradation and the Batek of Pahang, Malaysia. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Matisoff, James A. (2003). Aslian: Mon-Khmer of the Malay Peninsula. Mon-Khmer Studies 33: 1–58.Google Scholar

Morrison, Kathleen D. and Junker, Laura L. (eds.). (2002). Forager-traders in South and Southeast Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Nagata, Shuichi. (2006). Subgroup ‘names’ of the Sakai (Thailand) and the Semang (Malaysia): A literature survey. Anthropological Science 114: 45–57.Google Scholar

Oppenheimer, Stephen. (2011). MtDNA variation and southward Holocene human dispersals within mainland Southeast Asia. In Enfield, Nick and White, Joyce (eds.), Dynamics of human diversity: The case of mainland Southeast Asia. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics, 81–108.Google Scholar

Duangchan, Phaiboon. (2006). The Northern Aslian languages of southern Thailand. Mon-Khmer Studies 36: 207–224.Google Scholar

Porter, Claire C. and Marlowe, Frank W.. (2007). How marginal are forager habitats? Journal of Archaeological Science 34: 59–68.Google Scholar

Rambo, A. Terry. (1988). Why are the Semang? Ecology and ethnogenesis of aboriginal groups in Peninsular Malaysia. In Terry Rambo, A., Gillogly, K. and Hutterer, Karl L. (eds.), Ethnic diversity and the control of natural resources in Southeast Asia. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 19–35.Google Scholar

Reid, Lawrence A. (1987). The early switch hypothesis: Linguistic evidence for contact between Negritos and Austronesians. Man and Culture in Oceania 3: 41–59.Google Scholar

Reid, Lawrence A. (1994). Unravelling the linguistic histories of Philippine Negritos. In Dutton, Tom and Tryon, Darrell T. (eds.), Language contact and change in the Austronesian world. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 443–475.Google Scholar

Renfrew, Colin. (1987). Archaeology and language: The puzzle of Indo-European origins. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar

Sasse, Hans-Jürgen. (1992). Theory of language death. In Brenzinger, Matthias (ed.), Language death: Factual and theoretical explorations with special reference to East Africa. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 7–30.Google Scholar

Sather, Clifford. (1995). Sea nomads and rainforest hunter-gatherers: Foraging adaptations in the Indo-Malaysian archipelago. In Bellwood, Peter, Fox, James J. and Tryon, Darrell (eds.), The Austronesians: Historical and comparative perspectives. Canberra: Department of Anthropology, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University, 229–268.Google Scholar

Schebesta, Paul. (1928). Among the forest dwarfs of Malaya. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Schebesta, Paul. (1952). Die Negrito Asiens: Geschichte, Geographie, Umwelt, Demographie und Antropologie der Negrito. Vienna: St. Gabriel Verlag.Google Scholar

Skeat, Walter William and Blagden, Charles Otto. (1906). Pagan races of the Malay Peninsula. 2 vols. London: Macmillan and Co. (Reprint: 1966, London: Frank Cass)Google Scholar

Solheim, Wilhelm G. (1980). Searching for the origins of the Orang Asli. Federations Museum Journal 25: 61–75.Google Scholar

Spielmann, Katherine A. and Eder, James F.. (1994). Hunters and farmers: Then and now. Annual Review of Anthropology 23: 303–323.Google Scholar

Stiles, Daniel. (1992). The hunter-gatherer revisionist debate. Anthropology Today 8(2): 13–17.Google Scholar

Thomason, Sarah G. and Kaufman, Terrence. (1988). Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Trombetti, Alfredo. (1923). Elementi di glottologia. Volume pubblicato a spese della cassa di risparmio in Bologna. Bologna.Google Scholar

van der Sluys, Cornelia M. I. (2000). Gifts from the immortal ancestors: Cosmology and ideology of Jahai sharing. In Schweitzer, Peter P., Biesele, Megan and Hitchcock, Robert K. (eds.), Hunters and gatherers in the modern world: Conflict, resistance and self-determination.New York: Berghahn, 427–454.Google Scholar

Weinreich, Uriel. (1979) [1953]. Languages in contact: findings and problems. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Whitmore, T. C. (1984). Tropical rain forests of the Far East. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

Winstedt, Richard O. (1961). The Malays: A cultural history, 6th edition. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Zide, Norman and Pandya, Vishvajit. (1989). A bibliographical introduction to Andamanese linguistics. Journal of the American Oriental Society 109(4): 639–651.Google Scholar

Abbi, Anvita. (2006). Endangered languages of the Andaman Islands. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar

Abbi, Anvita. (2008). Is Great Andamanese genealogically and typologically distinct from Onge and Jarawa? Language Sciences (22 April 2008).Google Scholar

Bellwood, Peter. (1985). Prehistory of the Indo-Malaysian Archipelago. Sydney: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Benjamin, Geoffrey. (1976a). Austroasiatic subgroupings and prehistory in the Malay Peninsula. In Jenner, P. N. et al. (eds.), Austroasiatic Studies, Oceanic Linguistics Special Publications No. 13. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 37–128.Google Scholar

Blevins, Juliette. (2007). A long lost sister of Proto-Austronesian? Proto-Ongan, mother of Jarawa and Onge of the Andaman Islands. Oceanic Linguistics 46: 154–198.Google Scholar

Blust, Robert. (1985). The Austronesian homeland: A linguistic perspective. Asian Perspectives 20: 46–67.Google Scholar

Blust, Robert. (1994). The Austronesian settlement of mainland Southeast Asia. In Adams, Karen L. and Hudak, Thomas John (eds.), Papers from the Second Annual Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society. Tempe, AZ: Program for Southeast Asian Studies, Arizona State University, 25–83.Google Scholar

Colebrooke, R. H. (1795). On the Andaman Islands. Asiatic Researches 4: 385–395.Google Scholar

Cooper, Zarine. (2002). Archaeology and history: Early settlements in the Andaman Islands. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Diffloth, Gérard. (1968). Proto-Semai phonology. Federation Museums Journal (new series), 13: 65–74.Google Scholar

Diffloth, Gérard. (1979). Aslian languages and Southeast Asian prehistory. Federation Museums Journal 24: 3–16.Google Scholar

Diffloth, Gérard. (2005). The contribution of linguistic palaeontology and Austroasiatic. In Sagart, Laurent, Blench, Roger, and Sanchez-Mazas, Alicia (eds.), The peopling of East Asia: Putting together archaeology, linguistics and genetics. London: RoutledgeCurzon, 77–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kroeber, A. L. (1925). Handbook of the Indians of California. Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 78. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar

Man, E. H. (1883). On the aboriginal inhabitants of the Andaman Islands. Journal of the Anthropological Institute 12: 69–116, 327–434.Google Scholar

Man, E. H. (1889). A dictionary of the Central Nicobarese language. Bombay: British India Press.Google Scholar

Man, E. H. (1923). Dictionary of the South Andaman language. Bombay: British India Press.Google Scholar

Portman, M. V. (1887). Manual of the Andamanese languages. Calcutta: Office of the Superintendent of Government Printing. [Reprinted in 1992 by Manas Publications, Delhi.]Google Scholar

Portman, M. V. (1898). Notes on the languages of the South Andaman group of tribes. Calcutta: Office of the Superintendent of Government Printing.Google Scholar

Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. (1914). Notes on the languages of the Andaman Islands. Anthropos 9: 36–52.Google Scholar

Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. (1922). The Andaman Islanders: A study in social anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Shorto, Harry. (2006). A Mon-Khmer comparative dictionary. Sidwell, Paul (ed.). Pacific Linguistics 579. Canberra: Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, the Australian National University.Google Scholar

Sreenathan, M. (2001). The Jarawas: Language and culture. Anthropological Survey of India. Calcutta: Government of India.Google Scholar

Temple, Richard C. (1903). The Andaman and Nicobar Islands. Report on the Census. Census of India, 1901. Volume III. Calcutta: Office of the Superintendent of Government Printing, India.Google Scholar

Usher, Timothy. (2006). Great Andamanese reconstruction underway: A condensed handout with tentative remarks on Papuan and Australian vis-avis external language families. Mother Tongue: Journal of the Association for the Study of Language Prehistory XI: 295–298.Google Scholar

Weber, George. (2006). The Andamanese. www.andaman.org/BOOK/text.htm.Google Scholar

Whitehead, Rev. G. (1925). Dictionary of the Car-Nicobarese language. Rangoon: American Baptist Mission Press.Google Scholar

Zide, Norman, and Pandya, Vishvajit. (1989). A bibliographical introduction to Andamanese linguistics. Journal of the American Oriental Society 109: 639–651.Google Scholar

Antworth, Evan L. (1979). A grammatical sketch of Botolan Sambal. Philippine Journal of Linguistics Special Monograph 8. Manila: Linguistic Society of the Philippines.Google Scholar

Bellwood, Peter. (1985). Prehistory of the Indo-Malaysian archipelago. Sydney: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Bellwood, Peter, and Dizon, Eusebio. (2005). The Batanes archaeological project and the “out-of-Taiwan” hypothesis for Austronesian dispersal. Bulletin of the Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association 1(1): 1–36.Google Scholar

Bellwood, Peter, Stevenson, Janelle, Anderson, Atholl, and Dizon, Eusebio. (2003). Archaeological and palaeoenvironmental research in Batanes and Ilocos Norte Provinces, northern Philippines. Bulletin of the Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association 11: 141–161.Google Scholar

Blust, Robert. (1972). Note on PAN *qa(R)(CtT)a ‘outsiders, alien people’. Oceanic Linguistics 11(2): 166–171.Google Scholar

Blust, Robert (1976). Austronesian culture history: Some linguistic inferences and their relations to the archaeological record. World Archaeology 8(1): 19–43.Google Scholar

Blust, Robert (1981). Variation in retention rate among Austronesian languages. Paper presented to the Third International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, Bali, Indonesia.Google Scholar

Blust, Robert (1995). The prehistory of the Austronesian-speaking peoples: A view from language. Journal of World Prehistory 9(4): 453–510.Google Scholar

Blust, Robert (2005). The linguistic macrohistory of the Philippines: Some speculations. In Liao, Hsiu-chuan and Galvez Rubino, Carl R. (eds.), Current issues in Philippine linguistics and anthropology: Parangal kay Lawrence A. Reid. Manila: Linguistic Society of the Philippines and SIL Philippines, 31–68.Google Scholar

Blust, Robert, and Trussel, Steve. Ongoing. Austronesian comparative dictionary. www.trussel2.com/ACD/.Google Scholar

Dempwolff, Otto. (1938). Austronesisches Worterverzeichnis: Vergleichende Lautlehre des austronesischen Wortschatzes 3. Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für Eingeborenen-Sprachen 19. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer.Google Scholar

DuBois, Carl D. (1974). Sarangani Manobo dictionary. Unpublished computer printout. Library of SIL Philippines.Google Scholar

Eberhard, David M., Simons, Gary F., and Fennig, Charles D. (eds.). 2019. Ethnologue: Languages of the World. Twenty-second edition. Dallas, Texas: SIL International. Online version: http://www.ethnologue.com.Google Scholar

Elkins, Richard E. (1968). Manobo-English dictionary. Oceanic Linguistics Special Publication 3. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar

Finkbeiner, Marianne. 1983. Paranan lessons. Lesson 8. Manuscript. Library of SIL Philippines.Google Scholar

Forster, Jannette, and Barnard, Myra Lou. (1976). Dibabawon-English dictionary with English-Dibabawon index. Unpublished typescript. Library of SIL Philippines.Google Scholar

Gonzalez, Andrew. (2005). Contemporary Filipino (Tagalog) and Kapampangan: Two Philippine languages in contact. In Liao, Hsiu-chuan and Galvez Rubino, Carl R. (eds.), Current issues in Philippine linguistics and anthropology: Parangal kay Lawrence A. Reid. Manila: Linguistic Society of the Philippines and SIL Philippines, 93–114.Google Scholar

Hassan, Irene U., Ashley, Seymour A., and Ashley, Mary L.. (1975/1994). Tausug-English dictionary: Kabtangan iban maana, 2nd edn. Sulu Studies 6). Jolo, Sulu: Notre Dame of Sulu College; Manila: Summer Institute of Linguistics, 1st edn. Sulu Studies 4. Jolo, Sulu: Coordinated Investigation of Sulu Culture; Manila: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar

Headland, Thomas N. (1975). Report of eastern Luzon language survey. Philippine Journal of Linguistics 6(2), 47–54.Google Scholar

Headland, Thomas N. (2002). Why Southeast Asian Negritos are a disappearing people: A case study of the Agta of eastern Luzon, Philippines. In Headland, Thomas N. and Blood, Doris E. (eds.), What place for hunter-gatherers in millennium three? Publications in Ethnography 39. Dallas, TX: SIL International and International Museum of Cultures, 25–39.Google Scholar

Headland, Thomas N., and Headland, Janet D.. (1974). A Dumagat (Casiguran)-English dictionary. Pacific Linguistics C–28. Canberra: Department of Linguistics, Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University.Google Scholar

Headland, Thomas N., and Reid, Lawrence A.. (1989). Hunter-gatherers and their neighbors from prehistory to the present. Current Anthropology 30(1), 43–51.Google Scholar

Headland, Thomas N., and Reid, Lawrence A. (1991). Holocene foragers and interethnic trade: A critique of the myth of isolated hunter-gatherers. In Gregg, Susan A. (ed.), Between bands and states. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 333–340.Google Scholar

Himes, Ronald S. (2002). The relationship of Umiray Dumaget to other Philippine languages. Oceanic Linguistics 41(2): 275–294.Google Scholar

Himes, Ronald S. (2012). The Central Luzon group of languages. Oceanic Linguistics 51(2): 490–537.Google Scholar

Lobel, Jason W. (2013). Philippine and North Bornean languages: Issues in description, subgrouping, reconstruction. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Hawai’i.Google Scholar

Magaña, Delia S. (2003). The Agta foragers in the Northern Sierra Madre Natural Park: Ancestral domains in theory and practice. In van der Ploeg, Jan, Masipiqueña, Andres B., and Bernardo, Eileen C. (eds.), The Sierra Madre mountain range: Global relevance, local realities. Tuguegarao City: Golden Press, 241–257.Google Scholar

McFarland, Curtis D. (1980). A linguistic atlas of the Philippines. Study of Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa Monograph Series 15. Tokyo: Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.Google Scholar

McKaughan, Howard P., and Macaraya, Batua A.. (1967/1996). A Maranao dictionary. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press. 2nd edn, Manila: De La Salle University Press and Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar

Miller, Jeanne, and Miller, Helen. (1976). Mamanwa grammar. Language Data: Asian-Pacific Series 8. Huntington Beach, CA: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar

Omoto, Keiichi. (1981). The genetic origins of the Philippine Negritos. Current Anthropology 22(4): 421–422.Google Scholar

Paz, Victor J. (1999). Neolithic human movement to island Southeast Asia: The search for archaeobotanical evidence. Bulletin of the Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association 18(2): 151–157.Google Scholar

Pennoyer, F. Douglas. (1986–1987). Inati: The hidden Negrito language of Panay, Philippines. Philippine Journal of Linguistics 17(2), 18(1): 1–36.Google Scholar

Peterson, Warren E. (1974). Summary report of two archaeological sites from north-eastern Luzon. Archaeology and Physical Anthropology in Oceania 9(1): 26–35.Google Scholar

Reid, Lawrence A. (1971). Philippine minor languages: Word lists and phonologies. Oceanic Linguistics Special Publication 8. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar

Reid, Lawrence A. (1974). The Central Cordilleran subgroup of Philippine languages. Oceanic Linguistics 13(1–2): 511–560.Google Scholar

Reid, Lawrence A. (1976). Bontok-English dictionary. Pacific Linguistics C–36. Canberra: Department of Linguistics, Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University.Google Scholar

Reid, Lawrence A. (1978). Problems in the reconstruction of Proto-Philippine construction markers. In Wurm, S. A. and Carrington, Lois (eds.), Second International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics: Proceedings, Vol. 1. Pacific Linguistics C–61. Canberra: Department of Linguistics, Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University, 33–66.Google Scholar

Reid, Lawrence A. (1979). Towards a reconstruction of the pronominal systems of Proto-Cordilleran, Philippines. In Liem, Nguyen Dang (ed.), South-east Asian linguistic studies, Vol. 3. Pacific Linguistics C–45. Canberra: Department of Linguistics, Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University, 259–275.Google Scholar

Reid, Lawrence A. (1987). The early switch hypothesis: Linguistic evidence for contact between Negritos and Austronesians. Man and Culture in Oceania. Tokyo: Japanese Society for Oceanic Studies 3 (special issue), 41–60.Google Scholar

Reid, Lawrence A. (1989). Arta, another Philippine Negrito language. Oceanic Linguistics 28(1): 47–74.Google Scholar

Reid, Lawrence A. (1991). The Alta languages of the Philippines. In Harlow, Ray (ed.), VICAL 2: Western Austronesian and contact languages: Papers from the Fifth International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics. Auckland: Linguistic Society of New Zealand, 265–297.Google Scholar

Reid, Lawrence A. (1992). The Tasaday language: A key to Tasaday prehistory. In Headland, Thomas N. (ed.), The Tasaday controversy: An assessment of the evidence. Washington, DC: American Anthropological Association, 180–193.Google Scholar

Reid, Lawrence A. (1994a). Possible non-Austronesian lexical elements in Philippine Negrito languages. Oceanic Linguistics 33(1): 37–72.Google Scholar

Reid, Lawrence A. (1994b). Unraveling the linguistic histories of Philippine Negritos. In Dutton, Thomas E. and Tryon, Darrell T. (eds.), Language contact and change in the Austronesian world. Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs 77. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 443–475.Google Scholar

Reid, Lawrence A. (1996). The Tasaday tapes. In Pan-Asiatic linguistics: Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Languages and Linguistics, January 8–10, 1996, Vol. 5. Salaya, Thailand: Institute of Language and Culture for Rural Development, Mahidol University, 1743–1766.Google Scholar

Reid, Lawrence A. (1997). Linguistic archaeology: Tracking down the Tasaday language. In Blench, Roger and Spriggs, Matthew (eds.), Theoretical and methodological orientations: Archaeology and language 1. One World Archaeology 27. London: Routledge, 184–208.Google Scholar

Reid, Lawrence A. (2009). The reconstruction of a dual pronoun to Proto-Malayo-Polynesian. In Evans, Bethwyn (ed.), Discovering history through language. Papers in honour of Malcolm Ross. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics, 461–477.Google Scholar

Reid, Lawrence A. (2013). Who are the Philippine Negritos? Evidence from language. Human Biology 85(1–3): 329–358.Google Scholar

Reid, Lawrence A. (2018). Tasaday: Their current situation. Paper presented to the 12th International Conference on Hunting and Gathering Societies, Universiti Sains Malaysia, July 23–27, 2018.Google Scholar

Reid, Lawrence A., and Liao, Hsiu-chuan. (2004). A brief syntactic typology of Philippine languages. Language and Linguistics 5(2): 433–490.Google Scholar

Robinson, Laura C. (2012). Dupaningan Agta: Grammar, vocabulary, and texts. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

Santos, Pilar C. (1975). Sinauna Tagalog: A genetic study examining its relationship with other Philippine languages. MA thesis, Ateneo de Manila University, Quezon City.Google Scholar

Snow, Bryan E., Shutler, R., Nelson, D. E., Vogel, J. S., and Southon, J. R.. (1986). Evidence of early rice cultivation in the Philippines. Philippine Quarterly of Culture and Society 14(1): 3–11.Google Scholar

Tharp, James A. (1974). The Northern Cordilleran subgroup of Philippine languages. Working Papers in Linguistics 6(6): 53–114.Google Scholar

Vanoverbergh, Morice. (1937). Some undescribed languages of Luzon. Publications de la Commission d’Enquête Linguistique 3. Nijmegen: Dekker and van de Vegt.Google Scholar

Wolff, John U. (1972). A dictionary of Cebuano Visayan, 2 vols. Data Paper 87. Ithaca, NY: Southeast Asia Program, Cornell University.Google Scholar

Zorc, R. David. (1974). Internal and external relationships of the Mangyan languages. Oceanic Linguistics 13(1–2): 561–600.Google Scholar

Zorc, R. David (1979). Core etymological dictionary of Filipino, fascicle 1. Batchelor, Northern Territory, Australia: Public Domain.Google Scholar

Zorc, R. David (1993). The prehistory and origin of the Tagalog people. In Dahl, Øyvind (ed.), Language–a doorway between human cultures: Tributes to Dr. Otto Chr. Dahl on his ninetieth birthday. Oslo: Novus, 201–211.Google Scholar

Adelaar, K. Alexander. (1995). Borneo as a cross-roads for comparative Austronesian linguistics. In Bellwood, P., Fox, J. J., and Tryon, D. (eds.), The Austronesians: Historical and comparative perspectives. Canberra: Australian National University, Department of Anthropology, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, 75–95.Google Scholar

Bellwood, Peter. (1999). Archaeology of Southeast Asian hunters and gatherers. In Lee, Richard B. and Daly, Richard (eds.), The Cambridge encyclopaedia of hunters and gatherers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 284–288.Google Scholar

Berlin, Brent. (1992). Ethnobiological classification: Principles of categorization of plants and animals in traditional societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Blench, Roger. (2010). Was there an Austroasiatic presence in island SE Asia prior to the Austronesian expansion? Bulletin of the Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association 30: 133–144.Google Scholar

Blust, Robert. (1974). The Proto-North Sarawak vowel deletion hypothesis. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Hawai‘i.Google Scholar

Blust, Robert (1976a). Austronesian culture history: Some linguistic inferences and their relations to the archaeological record. World Archaeology 8(1): 19–43.Google Scholar

Blust, Robert (1976b). A third palatal reflex in Polynesian languages. Journal of the Polynesian Society 85: 339–358.Google Scholar

Blust, Robert (1977). Sketches of the morphology and phonology of Bornean languages 1 Uma Juman (Kayan). Papers in Borneo and Western Austronesian linguistics 2: 7–122.Google Scholar

Blust, Robert (1998). The position of the languages of Sabah, in Bautista, L.S. PAGTANÁW. Essays on Language in honor of Teodoro A. Llamzon. Manila: The Linguistic Society of the Philippines.Google Scholar

Blust, Robert (2002). Formalism or phoneyism? The history of Kayan final glottal stop. In Adelaar, K. Alexander and Robert, A. Blust (eds.), Between worlds: Linguistic paper in memory of David John Prentice. Pacific Linguistics, 29–37.Google Scholar

Blust, Robert (2003). A short morphology, phonology and vocabulary of Kiput, Sarawak. Pacific Linguistics, 546.Google Scholar

Blust, Robert (2007). Òma Lóngh Historical Phonology. Oceanic Linguistics 46: 1–53.Google Scholar

Blust, Robert (2010). The Greater North Borneo Hypothesis. Oceanic Linguistics 49(1): 44–118.Google Scholar

Brosius, J. Peter. (1988). A separate reality: Comments on Hoffman’s “The Punan: Hunters and gatherers of Borneo.” Borneo Research Bulletin 20(2): 81–106.Google Scholar

Brosius, J. Peter (1992). The axiological presence of death: Penan Geng death-names. PhD thesis, University of Michigan.Google Scholar

Brosius, J. Peter (1995). Signifying bereavement: Form and context in the analysis of Penan death-names. Oceania 66(2): 119–146.Google Scholar

Brosius, J. Peter (1999). The Western Penan of Borneo. In Lee, Richard B., and Daly, Richard (eds.), The Cambridge encyclopaedia of hunters and gatherers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 312–316.Google Scholar

Bruno Manser Fund. (2017). Mép tana’ suket asen lu’. Penan Community maps. Basel: Bruno Manser Fund and Keluan.Google Scholar

Césard, Nicolas, Guerreiro, Antonio, and Soriente, Antonia, eds. (2015). Petualangan Unjung dan Mbui Kuvong. Sastra lisan dan Kamus Punan Tuvu’ dari Kalimantan. Jakarta: EFEO and KPG Gramedia.Google Scholar

Clayre, Beatrice. (1996). The changing face of focus in the languages of Borneo. In Hein Steinhauer (ed.), Papers in Austronesian Linguistics 3. Pacific Linguistics A-84, 51–88.Google Scholar

Clayre, Beatrice (2014). A preliminary typology of the languages of Middle Borneo. In Sercombe, Peter, Boutin, Michael and Clynes, Adrian (eds.), Advances in research on Linguistic and cultural practices in Borneo (Memorial volume in honor of Peter Martin). Phillips: Borneo Research Council, 123–152.Google Scholar

Endicott, Kirk M. (1999). Introduction: Southeast Asia. In Lee, Richard B. and Daly, Richard (eds.), The Cambridge encyclopaedia of hunters and gatherers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 275–283.Google Scholar

Gordon, Raymond G. (ed.) (2005). Ethnologue: Languages of the world, 15th ed. Dallas: SIL International. www.ethnologue.comGoogle Scholar

Heine-Geldern, Robert Von. (1946). Research on Southeast Asia: Problems and suggestions. American Anthropologist 48: 149–175.Google Scholar

Hoffman, Carl L. (1986). The Punan: Hunters and gatherers of Borneo. Studies in Cultural Anthropology, 12. Ann Arbor: University Microfilms International Research Press.Google Scholar

Hose, Charles and McDougall., William (1912). The Pagan tribes of Borneo: A description of their physical, moral and intellectual condition with some discussion of their ethnic relations. 2 vols. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Hudson, Alfred B. (1978). Linguistic relations among Bornean peoples with special reference to Sarawak: An interim report, in Sarawak: Linguistics and Development Problems. Williamsburg, VA: College of William and Mary, Department of Anthropology. Studies in Third World Societies 3: 1–44.Google Scholar

Kaskija, Lars. (2017). Devolved, diverse, distinct? Hunter-gatherer research in Borneo. In King, V. T., Ibrahim, Z and Hassan, N. H. (eds.), Borneo studies in history, society and culture. Singapore: Springer, 125–158.Google Scholar

Kato, Yumi. (2017). Perceptions of the Iban in the Sihan Ethnoscape. Ngingit 9: 49–58.Google Scholar

Klimut, K. A. and Puri., R. K. (2007). The Punan from the Tubu’ river, East Kalimantan: A native voice on past, present, and future circumstances. In Sercombe, Peter and Bernard, Sellato (eds.), Beyond the green myth: Borneo’s hunter-gatherers in the 21st century. Copenhagen: Nias Press., 110–134.Google Scholar

Koizumi, Miyako, Mamung, Dollop and Levang, Patrice. (2012). Hunter-gatherers’ culture, a major hindrance to a settled agricultural life: The case of the Penan Benalui of East Kalimantan. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods 21(1): 1–15.Google Scholar

Koizumi, Miyako and Kuniyasu, Momose. (2007). Penan Benalui wild-plant use, classification, and nomenclature. Current Anthropology 48(3): 454–459.Google Scholar

Langub, Jayl. (2001). Sukét: Penan folk stories. Sukét Penan, Kota Samarahan: Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Institute of East Asian Studies, Oral Literature Series, 2.(2003)Google Scholar

Mackenzie, Ian. (2006). Dictionary of Eastern Penan. Ms. Soriente www.rimba.comGoogle Scholar

Mamung, Dollop. (1998).Kamus Punan-Indonesia. Bah Ngguh Punan Tufu’. Kamus Bahasa Punan Tubu’. Samarinda: Pusat Kebudayaan dan Alam Kalimantan.Google Scholar

Moseley, Christopher and Asher., R. E. (eds.). (1994). Atlas of the world’s languages, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Needham, Rodney. (1954). Penan and Punan. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, Malaysian Branch 27(1): 73–83.Google Scholar

Nicolaisen, Johannes. (1976a). The Penan of Sarawak: Further notes on the neo-evolutionary concept of hunters. Folk 18: 205–236.Google Scholar

Nicolaisen, Johannes (1976b). The Penan of the seventh division of Sarawak: Past, present and future. Sarawak Museum Journal 24(45): 35–61.Google Scholar

Okushima, Mika. (2008). Ethnohistory of the Kayanic peoples in Northeast Borneo (Part 2): expansion, regional alliance groups, and Segai disturbances in the colonial era. Borneo Research Bulletin 39.Google Scholar

Puri, Rajindra K. (2001). Bulungan thnobiology handbook. Bogor: CIFOR.Google Scholar

Puri, Rajindra K. (2005). Deadly Dances in the Bornean rainforest. Leiden: KITLV Press.Google Scholar

Puxon, Peter. (2018). Documentation of Sihan, an endangered language of Borneo. London: SOAS, Endangered Language Archive. https://elar.soas.ac.uk/Collection/MPI1104004.Google Scholar

Rousseau, Jerome. (1988). Central Borneo: A bibliography. Special Monograph n. 5. Kuching: Sarawak Museum.Google Scholar

Rousseau, Jerome (1990). Central Borneo: Ethnic identity and social life in a stratified society. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Sather, Clifford. (1995). Sea nomads and rainforest hunter-gatherers: Foraging adaptations in the Indo-Malaysian archipelago. In Bellwood, Peter, Fox, James J. and Tryon, Darrell (eds.), The Austronesians: Historical and comparative perspectives. Canberra: Department of Anthropology, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University, 229–268.Google Scholar

Sellato, Bernard. (1993). The Punan question and the reconstruction of Borneo’s culture history. In Sutlive Vincent, V. H. Jr. (ed.), Change and development in Borneo. Williamsburg, VA: Borneo Research Council, 47–82.Google Scholar

Sellato, Bernard (2002). Innermost Borneo: Studies in Dayak cultures. Paris: SevenOrients, and Singapore: Singapore University Press.Google Scholar

Sellato, Bernard (2007). Resourceful children of the forest: The Kalimantan Punan through the twentieth century. In Sercombe, Peter and Bernard, Sellato (eds.), Beyond the green myth: Borneo’s hunter-gatherers in the 21st century. Copenhagen: Nias Press, 61–90.Google Scholar

Sellato, Bernard (2018). Hunter-gatherers and the slave trade in coastal eastern Borneo, 18th–19th c. Paper presented at the Eleventh Conference on Hunting and Gathering Societies (CHAGS 11), at USM, Penang Malaysia.Google Scholar

Sellato, Bernard and Sercombe, Peter. (2007). Introduction. In Sercombe, Peter and Bernard, Sellato (eds.), Beyond the green myth: Borneo’s hunter-gatherers in the 21st century. Copenhagen: Nias Press, 1–49.Google Scholar

Sellato, Bernard and Soriente, Antonia (2015). The languages and peoples of the Müller Mountains: A contribution to the study of the origins of Borneo’s nomads and their languages. Wacana 16(2): 339–354.Google Scholar

Sercombe, Peter. (2002). Linguistic continuity and adaptation among the Penans of Brunei Darussalam. PhD thesis, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.Google Scholar

Sercombe, Peter (2006). The Eastern Penan language of Borneo. In Shin, Chong et al. (eds.), Reflections in Borneo Rivers: Essays in honour of Professor James T. Collins. Pontianak: Stain Press, 1–34.Google Scholar

Sercombe, Peter (2018). A dictionary of Eastern Penan. London: SOAS, Endangered Languages Archive. https://elar.soas.ac.uk/Collection/MPI1171473.Google Scholar

Shimeda, Takashi. (1996). Koe no chikara (Power of voice). Tokyo: Koubundou.Google Scholar

Sidwell, Paul and Blench, Roger. (2011). The Austroasiatic Urheimat: The Southeastern Riverine Hypothesis. In Enfield, Nick J. (ed.), Dynamics of human diversity: The case of mainland Southeast Asia. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics 627, 1–30.Google Scholar

Simons, Gary F. and Fenning, Charles D., eds. (2018). Ethnologue: Languages of the world, 21st ed. Dallas, TX: SIL International. www.ethnologue.com.Google Scholar

Soriente, Antonia. (1997). The Kenyah isolects of Long Pujungan district in North-east Kalimantan. In Ode’, C., and Stokhof, W. (eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Austronesian Languages. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 713–738.Google Scholar

Soriente, Antonia (2004). A classification of Kenyah varieties in Sarawak and Kalimantan. PhD thesis, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.Google Scholar

Soriente, Antonia (2008). The classification of Kenyah languages: A preliminary statement. Journal of the SEAsian Linguistics Society. 14(2). www.JSEALS.orgGoogle Scholar

Soriente, Antonia (2013). Undergoer voice in Borneo: Penan, Punan, Kenyah and Kayan languages. In NUSA: Linguistic studies of languages in and around Indonesia, Vol. 54. Voice variation in Austronesian languages of Indonesia: 175–203.Google Scholar

Thambiah, Shanty. (2007). The emergence of the ethnic category Bhuket: Diversity and the collective hunter-gatherer identity in Borneo. In Sercombe, Peter and Sellato, Bernard (eds.), Beyond the green myth: Borneo’s hunter-gatherers in the 21st century. Copenhagen: Nias Press, 91–109.Google Scholar

Urquhart, Ian A. N. (1958). Nomadic Punans and Pennans. Sarawak Gazette 30 November, 205–207.Google Scholar

Winzeler, Robert L. (2011). The peoples of Southeast Asia today: Ethnography, ethnology and change in a complex region. Plymouth: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar

Whittier, Herbert L. (1973). Social organization and symbols of social differentiation: an ethnographic study of the Kenyah Dayak of East Kalimantan. PhD thesis, Michigan State University. Ann Arbor: University Microfilms.Google Scholar

Wurm, Steven A. and Hattori, Shiro, eds. (1984). Language atlas of the Pacific area. Pacific Linguistics C-66.Google Scholar