Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-xxrs7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T13:26:34.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Conclusions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2016

Douglas A. Kibbee
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Get access

Summary

In his first inaugural address (1801), Thomas Jefferson enunciated what to him was a “sacred principle” of republican government, “that tho’ the will of the majority is in all cases to prevail, that will, to be rightful, must be reasonable; that the minority possess, their equal rights, which equal laws must protect, and to violate would be oppression.” In the same address, Jefferson speaks of “our equal right to the use of our own faculties, to the acquisitions of our own industry, to honor and confidence from our fellow citizens, resulting not from our birth, but from our actions and their sense of them.” He foresees many of the issues we have dealt with in the preceding pages, the relationship between the majority and minorities, the veneration of equality, for all (as liberty to pursue our individual happiness), for minorities (as rights that protect the minority), and procedurally (through a respect for laws). This equality does not deny material difference, as acquisitions earned through effort are natural, as are the differences in our innate faculties.

From the earliest days of the Republic, equality and liberty have been supreme virtues in American ideology, necessary components of a legitimate democracy. Both are served by justice, a process of rational decision-making. Equality has natural constraints: we are all born unequal in one manner or another. Justice is a matter of deciding rationally the ways in which we should be equal, and by what procedures we should pursue the redistributions necessary to create equality in those domains. Liberty also has natural constraints: our freedom does not extend to committing crimes. Justice is a matter of deciding rationally the limits of our liberty. The rationality of justice depends on a sense of fairness, a confidence in an impartiality born of higher principles. Reason, in a social context, is a perception rather than a reality, a term whose meaning is constantly negotiated. So too are the meanings of equality, liberty, and justice.

The negotiation of meaning takes place in language. There is no level playing field of language, as we judge others by their language and through our language. Language is a fundamental inequality of any society.

Type
Chapter
Information
Language and the Law
Linguistic Inequality in America
, pp. 182 - 199
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Conclusions
  • Douglas A. Kibbee, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
  • Book: Language and the Law
  • Online publication: 05 August 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139178013.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Conclusions
  • Douglas A. Kibbee, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
  • Book: Language and the Law
  • Online publication: 05 August 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139178013.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Conclusions
  • Douglas A. Kibbee, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
  • Book: Language and the Law
  • Online publication: 05 August 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139178013.008
Available formats
×