Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-8mjnm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T14:42:12.724Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Language and Democracy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2016

Douglas A. Kibbee
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Get access

Summary

One of the rallying cries of the American Revolution was “No taxation without representation.” The fundamental promise of a democracy is the opportunity to participate in the direction of the society one lives in. As Western democracies developed from the eighteenth century on, this promise has been realized through the election of representative government, and sometimes through direct voting on specific issues in referenda. The extension of that opportunity to an ever-expanding number of adults, the methods of delivery on that promise, and the ultimate effectiveness of democracy for representing common interests all intersect with considerations of the language of potential participants in self-government. The expansion of the right to vote focuses on individuals’ input, while effectiveness stresses outcomes relating to group membership. Both individual and group claims thus present issues linking language and the law.

Even before voters get their say, the choices open to them can be limited by language. Arizona had an English literacy test for voters from the time of its entry into the Union as a state (1912), a law overthrown by the Voting Rights Act of 1970. The Voting Rights Act says nothing about candidacy for election. Even before Arizona was a state, the territorial code declared ineligible for office anyone who “cannot write and read in the English language,” and the Enabling Act of 1910 requires of all state officers “the ability to read, write, speak and understand the English language sufficiently well to conduct the duties of the office without the aid of an interpreter.” Arizona's version of an English-only law, in 1988, included a provision in the state constitution requiring English fluency of all public office holders.

In San Luis, a small town on the Mexican border, Alejandrina Cabrera wanted to be a candidate for the city council; the sitting mayor, Juan Carlos Escamilla challenged her right to be on the ballot, given her lack of proficiency in English. The Arizona Supreme Court ruled in favor of the mayor, after admitting testimony of an expert who evaluated the English proficiency required to function in the position and Ms. Cabrera's level. As to the general principle of excluding those who do not speak English from public office, the court found that “there is no general constitutional right to seek or hold public office” (2012, at 207).

Type
Chapter
Information
Language and the Law
Linguistic Inequality in America
, pp. 33 - 52
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Language and Democracy
  • Douglas A. Kibbee, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
  • Book: Language and the Law
  • Online publication: 05 August 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139178013.003
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Language and Democracy
  • Douglas A. Kibbee, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
  • Book: Language and the Law
  • Online publication: 05 August 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139178013.003
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Language and Democracy
  • Douglas A. Kibbee, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
  • Book: Language and the Law
  • Online publication: 05 August 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139178013.003
Available formats
×