Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T20:07:14.514Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction to Part 2

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2010

P. K. McEwen
Affiliation:
Cardiff University
T. R. New
Affiliation:
La Trobe University, Victoria
A. E. Whittington
Affiliation:
National Museums of Scotland
P. K. McEwen
Affiliation:
Cardiff University
T. R. New
Affiliation:
La Trobe University, Victoria
A. E. Whittington
Affiliation:
National Museums of Scotland
Get access

Summary

The species of lacewings found in the crop environment may, in some way, be ‘pre-adapted’ to that environment through their regular association with a given vegetation type, and by prey preferences. In seeking additional candidate species for use in IPM, surveys of the lacewings found ‘naturally’ on particular crops or vegetation may provide valuable leads on which may be useful, and thus targeted for increasing the collective impact on pests or – at least – for augmenting control. Much of the use of lacewings in IPM will rely increasingly on native species, perhaps those found naturally in relatively limited areas or microhabitats, and the study of such natural assemblages will also suggest combinations of species for complementary use. This may involve combinations of high impact generalist species (such as members of the Chrysoperla carnea group, so beneficial in a great variety of crop situations) and more specialised species whose more restricted predilections may favour their use in particular contexts.

This section helps us to understand the spectrum of lacewings which may be involved, and how the assemblages found on different crops vary. Despite the generalised information available, the essays collectively mention around 10% each of the global fauna of Chrysopidae and Hemerobiidae (113 species in 22 genera, and 64 species in 10 genera respectively), but also indicate the low involvement of Coniopterygidae. A general picture emerges of particular lacewing species being abundant on different crops, and a greater variety of low abundance (and, perhaps, less habitatspecific or habitat-dependent) taxa.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×