Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T00:39:12.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

11 - Civil liberties at work

from Part III - Statutory regulation of the employment relationship

Hugh Collins
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science
K. D. Ewing
Affiliation:
King's College London
Aileen McColgan
Affiliation:
King's College London
Get access

Summary

Much of the material in this book is concerned with human rights or fundamental rights. These rights include both civil and political rights, such as the protection of freedom of association, and social and economic rights, such as the right to fair pay and protection against unjust dismissal. As we have seen, all of those rights form part of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU and therefore may influence the interpretation of labour law insofar as it emanates from EU law. Here, we focus on the implications of the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998) for the protection of individual employees in the enjoyment of their civil liberties at work. The Act provides a mechanism by which the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) of the Council of Europe may be legally enforceable in national courts. Without this legislation, individuals who had exhausted the available legal process under UK law were compelled to bring a claim before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in Strasbourg alleging that the national law failed to secure their Convention rights. This chapter examines the protection of workers’ privacy interests (Article 8), freedom of religion (Article 9) and whistleblowing and other issues relating to freedom of expression (Article 10). Other Convention rights protected under the HRA 1998 that are pertinent to labour law are considered in other chapters.

Interpreting the Human Rights Act

Before examining the detailed application of Convention rights in labour law, it is important to appreciate how the HRA 1998 may effect the interpretation and application of domestic labour law. Furthermore, it is necessary to note how the European Convention on Human Rights, as an international treaty regarding human rights, itself presents unique challenges with regard to its interpretation and evolution.

Type
Chapter
Information
Labour Law , pp. 408 - 444
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Morris, G.The Human Rights Act and the Public/Private Divide in Employment Law 1998 27 Industrial Law Journal293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2001
2001
2004
Mantouvalou, V.Work and Private Life: Sidabras and Dziautas v. Lithuania 2005 30 European Law Review573Google Scholar
2004
1968
1985
2001
1992
Ford, M.Article 8 and the Right to Privacy at the WorkplaceHuman Rights at WorkLondonInstitute of Employment Rights 2000 31Google Scholar
2001
Gautier, P.-Y.Hunter-Henin, M.France: Horizontal Application and the Triumph of the European Convention on Human RightsHuman Rights and the Private SphereLondonRoutledge-Cavendish 2007 117Google Scholar
2003
2003
2003
1979
1994
Kim, P. T.Regulating the Use of Genetic Information: Perspectives from the US Experience 2010 31 Comparative Labour Law and Policy Journal693Google Scholar
Kersley, B.Alpin, C.Bryson, A.Bewley, H.Dix, G.Oxenbridge, S.Inside the Workplace: Findings from the 2004 Workplace Employment Relations SurveyLondonRoutledge 2006 77Google Scholar
1980
1988
Mantouvalou, V.Human Rights and Unfair Dismissal: Private Acts in Public Spaces 2008 71 Modern Law Review912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedland, M.Privacy, Employment and the Human Rights Act 1998Human Rights and Private LawOxfordHart Publishing 2007 141Google Scholar
1999
1992
2001
Mantouvalou, V.Collins, H.Private Life and Dismissal 2009 38 Industrial Law Journal133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2010
2010
2002
2006
2002
2001
Bates, D. 2011
1999
1998
2008
2007
Ewing, K.The Implications of the ASLEF Case 2007 36 Industrial Law Journal425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2006
2004
2011
2002
2007
2009
2002
Klare, K. E.Power/Dressing: Regulation of Employee Appearance 1992 26 New England Law Review1398Google Scholar
1976

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×