Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T00:21:39.027Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - The Causes and Labor-Market Consequences of the Steep Increase in U.S. Incarceration Rates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Clair Brown
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Barry J. Eichengreen
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Michael Reich
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The United States currently incarcerates its residents at a rate that is greater than every other country in the world. Aggregating the state and federal prison populations as well as inmates in local jails, there were 737 inmates per 100,000 U.S. residents in 2005 (International Centre for Prison Studies 2007). This compares with a world average of 166 per 100,000 and an average among European Community member states of 135. Of the approximately 2.1 million U.S. residents incarcerated in 2005, roughly 65 percent were inmates in state and federal prisons and the remaining 35 percent resided in local jails.

Moreover, current U.S. incarceration rates are unusually high relative to historical figures for the United States itself. For the fifty-year period spanning the 1920s through the mid-1970s, the number of state and federal prisoners per 100,000 varied within a 10- to 20-unit band around a rate of approximately 110. Beginning in the mid-1970s, however, state prison populations grew at an unprecedented rate, nearly quadrupling between the mid-1970s and the present. Concurrently, the rate of incarceration in local jails more than tripled.

These trends in incarceration rates are a likely source of increasing socioeconomic inequality along a number of dimensions. First, there is growing evidence that prior incarceration and conviction adversely affect the employment prospects of former inmates. Second, recent research has linked the increase in incarceration to a number of secondary, negative social externalities affecting the members of the communities that disproportionately comprise the sources of our nation's prison inmates.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bonczar, Thomas P. (2003). Prevalence of Imprisonment in the U.S. Population, 1974–2001. Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report, NCJ 197976.Google Scholar
Butcher, Kirsten F., and Piehl, Anne Morrison (2006). “Why Are Immigrant Incarceration Rates So Low? Evidence on Selective Immigration, Deterrence, and Deportation.” Working Paper, Rutgers University.
Charles, Kerwin K., and Louh, Ming Ching (2007). “Male Incarceration, the Marriage Market, and Female Outcomes.” Working Paper, University of Chicago.
Cho, Rosa, and Lalonde, Robert (2005). “The Impact of Incarceration in State Prison on the Employment Prospects of Women.” Harris School Working Paper No. 5-10, University of Chicago.
Craig, Scott R. (1987). “Negligent Hiring: Guilt by Association.” Personnel Administrator, October: 32–34.Google Scholar
Donohue, John J. (2007). “Assessing the Relative Benefits of Incarceration: The Overall Change of the Previous Decades and the Benefits on the Margin.” Working Paper, Yale University.
Grogger, Jeffrey (1995). “The Effect of Arrest on the Employment and Earnings of Young Men.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 110, 1: 51–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, J. M. (1991). “Pre-Employment Information Services: Employers Beware.” Employee Relations Law Journal 17, 1: 45–69.Google Scholar
Holzer, Harry J., Raphael, Steven, and Stoll, Michael A. (2006). “Perceived Criminality, Criminal Background Checks and the Racial Hiring Practices of Employers.” Journal of Law and Economics 49, 2: 451–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,International Centre for Prison Studies (2007). World Prison Brief. Available at www.prisonstudies.org/.
Johnson, Rucker (2007). “Intergenerational Risks of Criminal Involvement and Incarceration.” Working Paper, University of California, Berkeley.
Johnson, Rucker, and Raphael, Steven (2006). “The Effect of Male Incarceration Dynamics on AIDS Infection Rates among African American Women and Men.” National Poverty Center Working Paper No. 06-22.
Johnson, Rucker, and Raphael, Steven (2007). “How Much Crime Reduction Does the Marginal Prisoner Buy?” Working Paper, University of California, Berkeley.
Jung, Haeil (2007). “The Effects of First Incarceration on Male Ex-Offenders' Employment and Earnings.” Working Paper, University of Chicago.
Kling, Jeffrey R. (2006). “Incarceration Length, Employment, and Earnings.” American Economic Review 96, 3: 863–876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornfeld, Robert, and Bloom, Howard (1999). “Measuring Program Impacts on Earnings and Employment: Do Unemployment Insurance Wage Records Agree with Survey Reports of Individuals?Journal of Labor Economics 17, 1: 168–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manza, Jeff, and Uggen, Christopher (2006). Locked Out: Felon Disenfranchisement and American Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pager, Devah (2003). “The Mark of a Criminal Record.” American Journal of Sociology 108, 5: 937–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersilia, Joan (2003). When Prisoners Come Home. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pettit, Becky, and Lyons, Christopher (2007). “Status and the Stigma of Incarceration: The Labor Market Effects of Incarceration by Race, Class, and Criminal Involvement.” In Bushway, Shawn, Stoll, Michael, and Weiman, David (eds.), Barriers to Reentry? The Labor Market for Released Prisoners in Post-Industrial America (pp. 206–226). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Pettit, Becky, and Western, Bruce (2004). “Mass Imprisonment and the Life Course: Race and Class Inequality in U.S. Incarceration.” American Sociological Review 69: 151–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raphael, Steven (2005). “The Socioeconomic Status of Black Males: The Increasing Importance of Incarceration.” In Auerbach, Alan, Card, David, and Quigley, John (eds.), Poverty, the Distribution of Income, and Public Policy. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Raphael, Steven (2007a). “Early Incarceration Spells and the Transition to Adulthood.” In Danziger, Sheldon and Rouse, Cecilia (eds.), The Price of Independence. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Raphael, Steven (2007b). “The Impact of Incarceration on the Employment Outcomes of Former Inmates: Policy Options for Fostering Self-Sufficiency and An Assessment of the Cost-Effectiveness of Current Corrections Policy.” Working Paper, University of California, Berkeley.
Raphael, Steven, and Ronconi, Lucas (2006). “Reconciling National and Regional Estimates of the Effects of Immigration on the U.S. Labor Market: The Confounding Effects of Native Male Incarceration Trends.” Working Paper, University of California, Berkeley.
Raphael, Steven, and Stoll, Michael (2005). “The Effect of Prison Releases on Regional Crime Rates.” In Gale, William G. and Pack, Janet Rothenberg (eds.), The Brookings–Wharton Papers on Urban Economic Affairs, vol. 5 (pp. 207–255). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Raphael, Steven, and Stoll, Michael (2007). “Why Are So Many Americans in Prison?” National Poverty Center, Working Paper No. 07-10.
Sabol, William J. (2007). “Local Labor-Market Conditions and Post-Prison Employment Experiences of Offenders Released from Ohio State Prisons.” In Bushway, Shawn, Stoll, Michael, and Weiman, David (eds.), Barriers to Reentry? The Labor Market for Released Prisoners in Post-Industrial America (pp. 257–303). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Spelman, William (2000). “The Limited Importance of Prison Expansion.” In Blumstein, Alfred and Wallman, Joel (eds.), The Crime Drop in America (pp. 97–129). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sweeten, Gary, and Apel, Robert (2007). “Incarceration and the Transition to Adulthood.” Working Paper, Arizona State University.
Travis, Jeremy (2005). But They All Come Back: Facing the Challenges of Prisoner Reentry. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar
Tyler, John H., and Kling, Jeffrey R. (2007). “Prison-Based Education and Reentry into the Mainstream Labor Market.” In Bushway, Shawn, Stoll, Michael, and Weiman, David (eds.), Barriers to Reentry? The Labor Market for Released Prisoners in Post-Industrial America (pp. 227–256). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Waldfogel, Joel (1994). “The Effect of Criminal Convictions on Income and the Trust ‘Reposed in the Workmen.’Journal of Human Resources, 29, 1: 62–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Western, Bruce (2002). “The Impact of Incarceration on Wage Mobility and Inequality.” American Sociological Review 67, 4: 526–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×