Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T16:02:49.095Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Arkansas

Third Time Was the Charm

from Part I - Change as an Exercise in Partisan Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2020

Herbert M. Kritzer
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota School of Law
Get access

Summary

It took three tries for Arkansas to make the change from partisan to nonpartisan elections. Twice, in 1970 and 1980, proposals for revising the state constitution that included changing to nonpartisan judicial elections were rejected by the voters. By 1999, when yet a third proposal was authorized by the legislature, Republican strength in the state had increased substantially. However, there were many more Democrats running for judicial office than Republicans. Because, historically, primary elections were entirely the responsibility of the parties, the parties set and collected filing fees from candidates running in their party primaries. Filing fees from judicial candidates constituted a significant source of revenue for the Democratic Party but not for the Republican Party. The combination of Democratic concerns that Republicans would start winning an increasing share of judicial offices and the Republican desire to deprive the Democratic Party of the revenue from filing fees paid by large numbers of judicial candidates provided the motivation for the legislature to pass and send to the voters another amendment changing to nonpartisan elections.

Type
Chapter
Information
Judicial Selection in the States
Politics and the Struggle for Reform
, pp. 58 - 74
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Arkansas
  • Herbert M. Kritzer
  • Book: Judicial Selection in the States
  • Online publication: 06 April 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108866941.006
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Arkansas
  • Herbert M. Kritzer
  • Book: Judicial Selection in the States
  • Online publication: 06 April 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108866941.006
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Arkansas
  • Herbert M. Kritzer
  • Book: Judicial Selection in the States
  • Online publication: 06 April 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108866941.006
Available formats
×