Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T06:49:22.598Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 January 2022

Patrick R. Goold
Affiliation:
City Law School, University of London
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
IP Accidents
Negligence Liability in Intellectual Property
, pp. 127 - 132
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowicz, M, ‘An Industrial Organization Approach to Copyright Law’ (2014) 46 William and Mary Law Review 33Google Scholar
Andrews, M, ‘Historical Patent Data: A Practitioner’s Guide’ (2020) 30 Journal of Economic & Management Strategy 368Google Scholar
Ard, BJ, ‘More Property Rules than Property: Revisiting the Right to Exclude in IP’ (2019) 68 Emory Law Journal 685Google Scholar
Aufderheide, P, and Jaszi, P, ‘Untold Stories: Creative Consequences of the Rights Clearance Culture for Documentary Filmmakers’ (2004) https://perma.cc/DN2E-F83WGoogle Scholar
Aufderheide, P, and Jaszi, P, Reclaiming Fair Use: How to Put Balance Back in Copyright (University of Chicago Press 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, J, Introduction to English Legal History (Oxford University Press 2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balganesh, S, ‘Foreseeability and Copyright Incentives’ (2009) 122 Harvard Law Review 1569Google Scholar
Balkin, J, ‘Digital Speech and Democratic Culture: A Theory of Freedom of Expression for the Information Society’ (2004) 79 New York University Law Review 1Google Scholar
Barnett, J, Innovators, Firms, and Markets: The Organizational Logic of Intellectual Property (Oxford University Press 2021)Google Scholar
Beauchamp, C, ‘The First Patent Litigation Explosion’ (2016) 125 Yale Law Journal 848Google Scholar
Beckerman-Rodau, A, ‘The Problem with Intellectual Property Rights: Subject Matter Expansion’ (2010) 13 Yale Journal of Law & Technology 35Google Scholar
Benkler, Y, ‘Siren Songs and Amish Children: Autonomy, Information, and Law’ (2001) 76 New York University Law Review 23Google Scholar
Benkler, Y, The Wealth of Networks (Yale University Press 2006)Google Scholar
Benkler, Y, ‘Networks of Power, Degrees of Freedom’ (2011) 5 International Journal of Communication 721Google Scholar
Bently, L, Sherman, B, Gangjee, D, and Johnson, P, Intellectual Property Law (Oxford University Press 2018)Google Scholar
Bernstein, G, ‘The Rise of the End User in Patent Litigation’ (2014) 55 Boston College Law Review 1443Google Scholar
Bessen, J, and Hunt, R, ‘An Empirical Look at Software Patents’ (2007) 16 Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 157Google Scholar
Bessen, J, and Meurer, M, Patent Failure: How Judges, Bureaucrats, and Lawyers Put Innovators at Risk (Princeton University Press 2008) 47Google Scholar
Blair, R, and Cotter, R, Intellectual Property: Economic and Legal Dimension of Rights and Remedies (Cambridge University Press 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, R, and Cotter, T, ‘Strict Liability and Its Alternatives in Patent Law’ (2002) 17 Berkeley Technology Law Journal 799Google Scholar
Bohn, R, and Short, J, ‘How Much Information? 2009 Report on American Consumers’ (2009) https://group47.com/HMI_2009_ConsumerReport_Dec9_2009.pdfGoogle Scholar
Bracha, O, ‘Standing Copyright on Its Head? The Googlization of Everything and the Many Faces of Property’ (2007) 85 Texas Law Review 1799Google Scholar
Bracha, O, Owning Ideas: The Intellectual Origins of American Intellectual Property, 1709–1909 (Cambridge University Press 2016)Google Scholar
Bracha, O, and Goold, P, ‘Copyright Accidents’ (2016) 96 Boston University Law Review 943Google Scholar
Bracha, O, and Syed, T, ‘Beyond Efficiency: Consequence-Sensitive Theories of Copyright’ (2014) 29 Berkeley Technology Law Journal 229Google Scholar
Bracha, O, and Syed, T, ‘Beyond the Incentive-Access Paradigm? Product Differentiation & Copyright Revisited’ (2014) 92 Texas Law Review 1841Google Scholar
Burk, D, and Lemley, M, ‘Fence Posts or Sign Posts? Rethinking Patent Claim Construction’ (2009) 157 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1743Google Scholar
Calabresi, G, The Costs of Accidents (Yale University Press 1970)Google Scholar
Calabresi, G, and Melamed, D, ‘Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral’ (1972) 85 Harvard Law Review 1089Google Scholar
Cane, P, The Anatomy of Tort Law (Bloomsbury 1997)Google Scholar
Cane, P, Responsibility in Law and Morality (Hart 2002)Google Scholar
Carroll, M, ‘Fixing Fair Use’ (2006) 85 North Carolina Law Review 1087Google Scholar
Castells, M, The Information Age: Economic, Society and Culture, vol 1, The Rise of the Network Society (2nd edn, Wiley Blackwell 2009)Google Scholar
Catanzariti, J (ed), The Papers of Thomas Jefferson, vol 22 (Princeton University Press 1990)Google Scholar
Chiang, TJ, ‘The Reciprocity of Search’ (2015) 66 Vanderbilt Law Review 1Google Scholar
Chisum, D, ‘Common Law and Civil Law Approaches to Patent Claim Interpretation’ in Vaver, D, and Bently, L (eds), Intellectual Property in the New Millennium (Cambridge University Press 2004)Google Scholar
Ciolino, D, and Donelon, E, ‘Questioning Strict Liability in Copyright’ (2002) 54 Rutgers Law Review 351Google Scholar
Claeys, E, ‘On the “Property” and the “Tort” in Trespass’ in Oberdiek, J (ed) The Philosophical Foundations of the Law of Torts (Oxford University Press 2014) 122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, R, ‘The Problem of Social Cost’ (1960) 3 Journal of Law and Economics 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, F, ‘Transcendental Nonsense and the Functional Approach’ (1935) 6 Columbia Law Review 809Google Scholar
Coleman, J, Risks and Wrongs (Oxford University Press 2002)Google Scholar
Coombe, R, ‘Objects of Property and Subjects of Politics: Intellectual Property Laws and Democratic Dialogue’ (1991) 69 Texas Law Review 1853Google Scholar
Cooter, R, and Ulen, T, Law and Economics (6th edn, 2016)Google Scholar
Demsetz, H, ‘Toward a Theory of Property Rights’ (1967) 57 American Economics Review 347Google Scholar
Diver, C, ‘The Optimal Precision of Administrative Rules’ (1983) 93 Yale Law Journal 65 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorfman, A, and Jacob, A, ‘Copyright as Tort’ (2011) 12 Theoretical Inquiries in Law 59Google Scholar
Drassinower, A, What’s Wrong with Copying? (Harvard University Press 2015)Google Scholar
Dworkin, G, The Theory and Practice of Autonomy (Cambridge University Press 1988)Google Scholar
Dworkin, R, Law’s Empire (Harvard University Press 1986)Google Scholar
Ehrlich, I, and Posner, R, ‘An Economic Analysis of Legal Rulemaking’ (1974) 3 Journal of Legal Studies 257Google Scholar
Elkin-Koren, N, ‘Cyberlaw and Social Change: A Democratic Approach to Copyright Law in Cyberspace’ (1996) 14 Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal 215Google Scholar
Elkin-Koren, N, and Frischman-Afori, O, ‘Rulifying Fair Use’ (2017) 59 Arizona Law Review 161Google Scholar
Epstein, R, ‘A Theory of Strict Liability’ (1973) 2 Journal of Legal Studies 151Google Scholar
Epstein, R, ‘Causation and Corrective Justice: A Reply to Two Critics’ (1979) 8 Journal of Legal Studies 477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, R, ‘The Historical Origins and Economic Structure of Workers’ Compensation Law’ (1982) 16 Georgia Law Review 775Google Scholar
Epstein, R, Simple Rules for a Complex World (Harvard University Press 1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, JM, and Ennis, R, ‘Causation and Liability’ (1986) 15 Philosophy & Public Affairs 33Google Scholar
Fisher, W, ‘Reconstructing the Fair Use Doctrine’ (1988) 101 Harvard Law Review 1659Google Scholar
Fisher, W, ‘Theories of Intellectual Property’ in Munzer, S (ed), New Essays in the Legal and Political Theory of Property (Cambridge University Press 2001)Google Scholar
Fisher, W, ‘The Implications for Law of User Innovation’ (2010) 94 Minnesota Law Review 1417Google Scholar
Fletcher, G, ‘Fairness and Utility in Tort Theory’ (1972) 85 Harvard Law Review 537Google Scholar
Frischman, B, and Lemley, M, ‘Spillovers’ (2007) 107 Columbia Law Review 257Google Scholar
Fromer, J, ‘Expressive Incentives in Intellectual Property’ (2012) 98 Virginia Law Review 1745Google Scholar
Ganley, P, ‘Google Book Search: Fair Use, Fair Dealing and the Case for Intermediary Copying’ (2006) https://bit.ly/3hSXJWSGoogle Scholar
Glushko, R, ‘Failure Is an Orphan: Reflecting on the Fall of the University of Michigan Orphan Works Project’ (2017) 292 Research Library Issues 27Google Scholar
Goldberg, J, and Zipursky, B, ‘Torts as Wrongs’ (2010) 88 Texas Law Review 917Google Scholar
Goldberg, J, and Zipursky, B, ‘The Strict Liability in Fault and the Fault in Strict Liability’ (2016) 85 Fordham Law Review 743Google Scholar
Goldberg, J, and Zipursky, B, Recognizing Wrongs (Harvard University Press 2020)Google Scholar
Gompel, S, Formalities in Copyright Law: An Analysis of their History, Rationale, and Possible Future (Wolters Kluwer 2011)Google Scholar
Goold, P, ‘Corrective Justice and Copyright Infringement’ (2014) 16 Vanderbilt Journal Entertainment & Technology Law 251Google Scholar
Goold, P, ‘Is Copyright Infringement a Strict Liability Tort?’, (2015) 30 Berkeley Technology Law Journal 305Google Scholar
Goold, P, ‘Unbundling the “Tort” of Copyright Infringement’ (2016) 102 Virginia Law Review 1833Google Scholar
Goold, P, ‘Intent in Patent Infringement’ (2017) 68 Florida Law Review Forum 93Google Scholar
Goold, P, ‘Patent Accidents: Questioning Strict Liability in Patent Law’ (2020) 95 Indiana Law Journal 1075Google Scholar
Goold, P, ‘Moral Reflections on Strict Liability in Copyright’ (2021) 44 Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts 123Google Scholar
Gordon, W, ‘The Concept of “Harm” in Copyright’ in Balganesh, S (ed), Intellectual Property and the Common Law (Cambridge University Press 2013) 431Google Scholar
Hansen, D, Hashimoto, K, Hinze, G, Samuelson, P, and Urban, J, ‘Solving the Orphan Works Problem for the United States’ (2014) 37 Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts 1Google Scholar
Hargreaves, I, ‘Review of Intellectual Property and Growth’ (May, 2011) https://bit.ly/3AIezPfGoogle Scholar
Hart, H, The Concept of Law (Oxford University Press 1961)Google Scholar
Hart, H, and Honoré, T, Causation in Law (2nd edn, Clarendon Press 1985)Google Scholar
Hetcher, S, ‘The Immorality of Strict Liability in Copyright’ (2013) 17 Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review 1Google Scholar
Holman, C, ‘Bowman v Monsanto Co.: A Bellwether for the Emerging Issues of Patentable Self-Replicating Technologies and Inadvertent Infringement’ (2015) 80 Missouri Law Review 665Google Scholar
Holmes, O, The Common Law (Macmillan 1882)Google Scholar
Honoré, T, ‘Responsibility and Luck: The Moral Basis of Strict Liability’ (1988) 104 Law Quarterly Review 530Google Scholar
Honoré, T, Responsibility and Fault (Hart 1999)Google Scholar
Horwitz, M, The Transformation of American Law, 1780–1860 (Harvard University Press 1977)Google Scholar
Houweling, M, ‘The New Private Law and Intellectual Property: Calibrating Copyright on the Common Law Continuum’ in Gold, A, Goldberg, J, Kelly, D, Sherwin, E, and Smith, H (eds), The Oxford Handbook of New Private Law (Oxford University Press 2020) 397Google Scholar
Kaplow, L, ‘Rules Versus Standards: An Economic Analysis’ (1992) 42 Duke Law Journal 557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karshtedt, D, ‘Causal Responsibility and Patent Infringement’ (2017) 70 Vanderbilt Law Review 565Google Scholar
Khan, ZB, The Democratization of Invention: Patents and Copyright in American Economic Development, 1790–1920 (Cambridge University Press 2005)Google Scholar
Landes, W, and Posner, R, The Economic Structure of Tort Law (Harvard University Press 1987)Google Scholar
Landes, W, and Posner, R, ‘An Economic Analysis of Copyright Analysis of Copyright’ (1989) 18 Journal of Legal Studies 325Google Scholar
Landes, W, and Posner, R, The Economic Structure of Intellectual Property Law (Harvard University Press 2009)Google Scholar
Latman, A, and Tager, W, ‘Study No 25: Liability of Innocent Infringers of Copyrights’ (United States Government Printing Office, 1958) Copyright Law Revision StudiesGoogle Scholar
Lee, W, and Mealamed, AD, ‘Breaking the Vicious Cycle of Patent Damages’ (2016) 101 Cornell Law Review 385Google Scholar
Lemley, M, ‘Rational Ignorance at the Patent Office’ (2001) 95 Northwestern University Law Review 1495Google Scholar
Lemley, M, ‘Should Patent Law Require Proof of Copying?’ (2007) 105 Michigan Law Review 1524Google Scholar
Lemley, M, and Shapiro, C, ‘Patent Holdup and Royalty Stacking’ (2007) 85 Texas Law Review 1991Google Scholar
Lemley, M, and Cotropia, C, ‘Copying in Patent Law’ (2009) 87 North Carolina Law Review 1421Google Scholar
Lin, L, ‘Licensing Strategies in the Presence of Patent Thickets’ (2011) 28 Journal of Product Innovation Management 698Google Scholar
Lipton, J, ‘Cyberspace, Exceptionalism, and Innocent Copyright Infringement’ (2011) Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law 767, 802804Google Scholar
London Economics, ‘Economic Study of Patent Backlogs and a System of Mutual Recognition’ (January 2010) https://bit.ly/3iuoIbU accessed 20 December 2020Google Scholar
Luo, H, and Mortimer, JH, ‘Copyright Infringement in the Market for Digital Images’ (2016) 106 American Economics Review 140Google Scholar
Lyman, P, and Varian, H, ‘How Much Information?’ (2003) https://bit.ly/3crfzNqGoogle Scholar
Machlup, F, ‘An Economic Review of the Patent System’ (United States Government Printing Office, 1958) Study of the Subcommittee of Patents, Trademarks and CopyrightsGoogle Scholar
Magliocca, G, ‘Blackberries and Barnyards: Patent Trolls and the Perils of Innovation’ (2006) 82 Notre Dame Law Review 1809Google Scholar
Margolis, S, ‘Law and Economics of Copyright Remedies’, in Watt, R (ed), Handbook on the Economics of Copyright (Elgar 2014) 246.Google Scholar
Maurer, S, and Scotchmer, S, ‘The Independent Invention Defence in Intellectual Property’ (2002) 69 Economica 535Google Scholar
Mautner, M, ‘The Eternal Triangles of the Law’ (1991) 90 Michigan Law Review 95Google Scholar
McNish, J, and Silcoff, S, Losing the Signal: The Untold Story Behind the Extraordinary Rise and Spectacular Fall of BlackBerry (Flatiron Books 2015)Google Scholar
Menell, P, and Meurer, M, ‘Notice Failure and Notice Externalities’ (2013) 5 Journal of Legal Analysis 1Google Scholar
Merges, R, ‘A Few Kind Words for Absolute Infringement in Patent Law’ (2016) 31 Berkeley Technology Law Journal 1Google Scholar
Merton, R, ‘Singletons and Multiples in Scientific Discovery: A Chapter in the Sociology of Science’ (1961) 105 Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 470Google Scholar
Mossoff, A, ‘Exclusion and Exclusive Use in Patent Law’ (2009) 22 Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 1Google Scholar
Mossoff, A, ‘The Rise and Fall of the First American Patent Thicket: The Sewing Machine War of the 1850s’ (2011) 53 Arizona Law Review 165Google Scholar
Mossoff, A, ‘The Trespass Fallacy in Patent Law’ (2013) 65 Florida Law Rev 1687Google Scholar
Netanel, N, ‘Making Sense of Fair Use’ (2011) 15 Lewis & Clark Law Review 715Google Scholar
Nimmer, D, Nimmer on Copyright (Matthew Bender 2020)Google Scholar
Oswald, L, ‘The “Strict Liability” of Direct Patent Infringement’ (2017) 19 Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law 993Google Scholar
Pallante, M, ‘The Next Great Copyright Act’ (2013) 36 Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts 315Google Scholar
Parchomovsky, G, ‘Fair Use, Efficiency, and Corrective Justice’ (1997) 3 Legal Theory 347Google Scholar
Parchomovsky, G, and Bell, A, ‘Restructuring Copyright Infringement’ (2020) 98 Texas Law Review 679Google Scholar
Penner, J, The Idea of Property in Law (Oxford University Press 2000)Google Scholar
Perry, S, ‘The Impossibility of General Strict Liability’ (1988) 1 Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence 147Google Scholar
Porat, A, ‘Misalignments in Tort Law’ (2011) 121 Yale Law Journal 82Google Scholar
Priest, G, and Klein, B, ‘The Selection of Disputes for Litigation’ (1984) 13 Journal of Legal Studies 1Google Scholar
Rabin, R, ‘The Historical Development of the Fault Principle: A Reinterpretation’ (1980) 15 Georgia Law Review 925Google Scholar
Raz, J, The Morality of Freedom (Clarendon Press 1986)Google Scholar
Reece, RA, ‘Innocent Infringement in US Copyright Law: A History (2007) 30 Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts 133Google Scholar
Reitzig, M, Henkel, J, and Heath, C, ‘On Sharks, Trolls, and their Patent Prey: Unrealistic Damage Awards and Firms’ Strategies of “Being Infringed”’ (2007) 36 Research Policy 134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risch, M, ‘The Failure of Public Notice in Patent Prosecution’ (2007) 21 Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 179Google Scholar
Rosen, Z, and Schwinn, R, ‘An Empirical Study of 225 Years of Copyright Registrations’ (2020) 94 Tulane Law Review 1003Google Scholar
Sag, M, ‘Orphan Works as Grist for the Data Mill’ (2012) 27 Berkeley Technology Law Journal 1503Google Scholar
Samuelson, P, ‘The Quest for a Sound Conception of Copyright’s Derivative Work Right’ (2012) 101 Georgetown Law Journal 1505Google Scholar
Samuelson, P, and Wheatland, T, ‘Statutory Damages in Copyright Law: A Remedy in Need of Reform’ (2009) 51 William and Mary Law Review 439Google Scholar
Shapiro, C, ‘Navigating the Patent Thicket: Cross Licenses, Patent Pools, and Standard Setting’ (2001) 1 Innovation Policy and the Economy 120Google Scholar
Shavell, S, Economic Analysis of Accident Law (Harvard University Press 1987)Google Scholar
Sherman, B, and Bently, L, The Making of Modern Intellectual Property Law: The British Experience, 1760–1911 (Cambridge University Press 1999)Google Scholar
Sinclair, K, ‘Liability for Copyright Infringement: Handling Innocence in a Strict-Liability Context’ (1970) 58 California Law Review 940Google Scholar
Smith, H, ‘Exclusion versus Governance: Two Strategies for Delineating Property Rights’ (2002) 31 Journal of Legal Studies S453Google Scholar
Smith, H, ‘Intellectual Property as Property: Delineating Entitlements in Information’ (2007) 116 Yale Law Journal 1742Google Scholar
Smith, H, ‘Property as the Law of Things’ (2012) 125 Harvard Law Review 1691Google Scholar
Smith, H, ‘Equity as Second-Order Law: The Problem of Opportunism’ (15 January 2015) https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2617413Google Scholar
Smith, H, ‘Equity as Meta-Law’ (2021) 130 Yale Law Journal 1050Google Scholar
Sprigman, C, ‘Reform(aliz)ing Copyright’ (2004) 57 Stanford Law Review 485Google Scholar
Sprigman, C, ‘Berne’s Vanishing Ban on Formalities’ (2013) 28 Berkeley Technology Law Journal 1565Google Scholar
Sterk, S, ‘Strict Liability and Negligence in Property Theory’ (2012) 160 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 2129Google Scholar
Stern, RG, and Bugaisky, L, ‘The Expansion of Statutory Subject Matter Under the 1952 Patent Act’ (2004) 37 Akron Law Review 217Google Scholar
Subotnik, E, ‘Intent in Fair Use’ (2014) 18 Lewis & Clark Law Review 935Google Scholar
Sunder, M, From Goods to a Good Life: Intellectual Property and Global Justice (Stanford University Press 2012)Google Scholar
Swaddling, W, ‘Property: General Principles’ in Burrows, A (ed), English Private Law (3rd edn, Oxford University Press 2013)Google Scholar
Thompson, JJ, ‘Remarks on Causation and Liability’ (1984) 13 Philosophy & Public Affairs 101Google Scholar
Urban, J, ‘How Fair Use Can Help Solve the Orphan Works Problem’ (2012) 27 Berkeley Technology Law Journal 1379Google Scholar
Vermont, S, ‘Independent Invention as a Defence to Patent Infringement’ (2006) 105 Michigan Law Review 475Google Scholar
Vishnubhakat, S, ‘An Intentional Tort Theory of Patents’ (2016) 68 Florida Law Review 571Google Scholar
Walterscheid, EC, ‘Thomas Jefferson and the Patent Act of 1793’ (1998) 39 Essays in History https://bit.ly/3vbKVOhGoogle Scholar
Weinrib, E, The Idea of Private Law (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2012)Google Scholar
Winfield, P, ‘Mistake of Law’ (1943) 59 Law Quarterly Review 327Google Scholar
Wright, R, ‘Causation in Tort Law’ (1985) 73 California Law Review 1735Google Scholar
Yoo, C, ‘Copyright and Product Differentiation’ (2004) 79 New York University Law Review 212Google Scholar
Ziedonis, RH, ‘On the Apparent Failure of Patents: A Response to Bessen and Meurer’ (2008) 22 Academy of Management Perspectives 21Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Patrick R. Goold
  • Book: IP Accidents
  • Online publication: 24 January 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108882576.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Patrick R. Goold
  • Book: IP Accidents
  • Online publication: 24 January 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108882576.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Patrick R. Goold
  • Book: IP Accidents
  • Online publication: 24 January 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108882576.008
Available formats
×