Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T16:48:01.302Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - Failed introductions: finches from outside Australia

from Part II - Modern invaders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2014

Jan Komdeur
Affiliation:
University of Groningen
Martijn Hammers
Affiliation:
University of Groningen
Herbert H. T. Prins
Affiliation:
Wageningen Universiteit, The Netherlands
Iain J. Gordon
Affiliation:
The James Hutton Institute, Scotland
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Humans have deliberately or accidentally introduced various plants and animals to areas outside their natural range (Long 1981; Lever 1994). European acclimatisation societies introduced many bird species from Europe into Australasia and the New World to enrich the local avifauna, but species were also introduced in order to control insect pests or as game birds. Some of these species have established populations successfully and became invasive, often with negative or even disastrous consequences for biodiversity, community structure and native species, sometimes leading to species extinction (e.g. Case 1996; Sala et al. 2000; Stein et al. 2000). Introduced animals are estimated to be responsible for about 40% of historic extinctions (Caughley and Gunn 1996). Consequently, introductions of exotic species and their impacts on native species have received much attention in recent years (see e.g. Savidge 1987; Blackburn and Duncan 2001; Duncan et al. 2003; Smith 2005). However, not all introductions of exotic species were successful; many introduced species either failed to establish or established but did not spread (e.g. Duncan et al. 2001). The majority of bird introductions into continental areas are failures. For example, in the continental United States, only 13 species of introduced birds are common, although at least 98 species have been introduced (Case 1996). On average, introductions of continental bird species are only successful about 10–30% of the time (Krebs 2001). The detailed historical records of bird introductions to New Zealand, the United States and many oceanic islands have been used extensively to test hypotheses about the factors influencing introduction success and the subsequent spread of introduced birds (New Zealand: Veltman et al. 1996; Duncan 1997; Green 1997; Sorci et al. 1998; Duncan et al. 1999; Legendre et al. 1999; Sol and Lefebvre 2000; Southeastern Florida: Rand 1980). A similarly detailed record of bird introductions to Australia exists (Long 1981; Newsome and Noble 1986); of the 52 bird species introduced to mainland Australia, only 19 (37%) species have successfully established (Long 1981; Newsome and Noble 1986) and only 5 (10%) species have become widespread and abundant in Australia (Duncan et al. 2001).

Type
Chapter
Information
Invasion Biology and Ecological Theory
Insights from a Continent in Transformation
, pp. 324 - 350
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allee, W. C., Emerson, A. E., Park, O., Park, T. and Schmidt, K. P. (1949). Principles of Animal Ecology. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders,.Google Scholar
Anderson, T. R. (2006). Biology of the Ubiquitous House Sparrow: From Genes to Populations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, A. J. and Moeed, A. (1987). Rapid genetic differentiation and founder effect in colonizing populations of common mynas (Acridotheres tristis). Evolution 41: 525–538.Google Scholar
Berggren, A. (2001). Colonization success in Roesel’s bush-cricket Metrioptera roeseli: the effect of propagule size. Ecology 82: 274–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berthier, K., Galan, M., Foltete, J. C., Charbonnel, N. and Cosson, H. F. (2005). Genetic structure of the cyclic fossorial water vole (Arvicola terrestris): landscape and demographic influences. Molecular Ecology 14: 2861–2871.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
BirdLife International (2012). IUCN Red List for Birds. Available at: .
Blackburn, T. M. and Duncan, R. P. (2001). Determinants of establishment success in introduced birds. Nature 414: 195–197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blackburn, T. M., Lockwood, J. L. and Cassey, P. (2009). Avian Invasions: The Ecology and Evolution of Exotic Birds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brazil, M. (2009). Birds of East Asia. London: Christopher Helm.Google Scholar
Briskie, J. V. (2006). Introduced birds as model systems for the conservation of endangered native birds. The Auk 123: 949–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J. H. (1989). Patterns, modes and extents of invasions by vertebrates. In Drake, J. A., Mooney, H. A., di Castri, F., Groves, R. H. and Kruger, F. G. (eds), Biological Invasions: A Global Perspective. Chichester, NY: Wiley, pp. 85–109.Google Scholar
Bull, P. C., Gaze, P. D. and Robertson, C. J. R. (1985). The Atlas of Bird Distribution in New Zealand. Wellington, New Zealand: The Ornithological Society of New Zealand.Google Scholar
Bump, G. (1970). The Coturnix or Old World Quails. US Dep. Int. Fish, Wildl. Serv., Bur. Sport, Fish. Wildl, FGL-10. Washington DC: GPO.Google Scholar
Case, T. J. (1996). Global patterns in the establishment and distribution of exotic birds. Biological Conservation 78: 69–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassey, C., Blackburn, T. M. and Evans, K. L. (2005). Changes in egg size of exotic passerines introduced to New Zealand. Notornis 52: 243–246.Google Scholar
Cassey, P. (2001a). Determining variation in the success of New Zealand land birds. Global Ecological Biogeogaphy 10: 161–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassey, P. (2001b). Are there body size implications for the success of globally introduced land birds. Ecography 21: 413–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassey, P., Blackburn, T. M., Sol, D., Duncan, R. P. and Lockwood, J. L. (2004). Global patterns of introduction effort and establishment success in birds. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, Biological Science (Suppl.) 271: S405–S408.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caughley, G. and Gunn, A. (1996). Conservation Biology in Theory and Practice. Oxford: Blackwell Science.Google Scholar
Cena, C. J., Morgan, G. E., Malette, M. D. and Heath, D. D. (2006). Inbreeding, outbreeding and environmental effects on genetic diversity in 46 walleye (Sander vitreus) populations. Molecular Ecology 15: 303–320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coleman, J. D. and Spurr, E. B. (2001). Farmers perceptions of bird damage and control in arable crops. NZ Plant Protection 54: 184–187.Google Scholar
Davies, N. B. and Brooke, M. de L. (1989). An experimental study of co-evolution between the cuckoo, Cuculus canorus, and its hosts. I. Host egg discrimination. Journal of Animal Ecology 58: 207–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dong, J., Chuanhai, L. and Zhibin, Z. (2010). Density-dependent genetic variation in dynamic populations of the greater long-tailed hamster (Tscherskia triton). Journal of Mammalogy 91: 200–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, R. P. (1997). The role of competition and introduction effort in the success of passeriform birds introduced to New Zealand. American Naturalist 149: 903–915.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duncan, R. P. and Blackburn, T. M. (2002). Morphological over-dispersion in game birds (Aves: Galliformes) successfully introduced to New Zealand was not caused by interspecific competition. Evoutionary Ecology Research 4: 551–561.Google Scholar
Duncan, R. P, Blackburn, T. M. and Sol, D. (2003). The ecology of bird introductions. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 34: 71–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, R. P., Blackburn, T. M. and Veltman, C. J. (1999). Determinants of geographical range sizes: a test using introduced New Zealand birds. Journal of Animal Ecology 68: 963–975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, R. P., Bomford, M., Forsyth, D. M. and Conibear, L. (2001). High predictability in introduction outcomes and the geograpical range size of introduced Australian birds: a role for climate. Journal of Animal Ecology 70: 621–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebenhard, T. (1988). Introduced birds and mammals and their ecological effects. Swedish Wildlife Research 13: 1–107.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, P. (1989). Attributes of invaders and the invading process: vertebrates. In Drake, J. A., Mooney, H. A., di Castri, F., Groves, R. H. and Kruger, F. G. (eds), Biological Invasions: A Global Perspective. Chichester, NY: Wiley, pp. 315–328.Google Scholar
Ericson, P. G. P, Irestedt, M. and Johansson, U. S. (2003). Evolution, biogeography, and patterns of diversification in passerine birds. Journal of Avian Biology 34: 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, K. L., Duncan, R. P., Blackburn, T. M. and Crick, H. Q. P. (2005). Investigating geographic variation in clutch size using a natural experiment. Functional Ecology 19: 616–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feare, C. and Craig, A. (1998). Starlings and Mynas. London: Christopher Helm.Google Scholar
Fisher, D. O. and Owens, I. P. F. (2004). The comparative method in conservation biology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19: 391–398.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forsyth, D. M. and Duncan, R. P. (2001). Propagule size and the relative success of exotic ungulate and bird introduction to New Zealand. The American Naturalist 157: 583–595.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forsyth, D. S., Duncan, R. P., Bomford, M. and Moore, G. (2003). Climatic suitability, life-history traits, introduction effort, and the establishment and spread of introduced mammals in Australia. Conservation Biology 18: 557–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankham, R., Ballou, J. D. and Briscoe, D. A. (2004). A Primer of Conservation Genetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamarra, J. G. P., Montoya, J. M., Alonso, D. and Solé, R. V. (2005). Competition and introduction regime shape exotic bird communities in Hawaii. Biological Invasions 7: 297–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaston, K. J. (1988). Patterns in the local and regional dynamics of moth populations. Oikos 53: 49–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaston, K. J. (1994). Rarity. London: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, B. J. (1998). Behavior and ecology of the shining cuckoo Chrysococcyx lucidus. In Rothstein, S. I. and Robinson, S. K. (eds), Parasitic Birds and their Hosts: Studies in Coevolution. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 143–151.Google Scholar
Green, R. E. (1997). The influence of numbers released on the outcome of attempts to introduce exotic bird species to New Zealand. Journal of Animal Ecology 66: 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffith, B., Scott, J. M., Carpenter, J. W. and Reed, C. (1989). Translocation as a species tool: status and strategy. Science 245: 477–480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hale, K. and Briskie, J. V. (2007). Response of introduced European birds in New Zealand to experimental brood parasitism. Journal of Avian Biology 38: 198–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanski, I. (1991). Single-species metapopulation dynamics: concepts, models and observations. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 42: 17–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanski, I., Kouki, J. and Halkka, A. (1993) Three explanations of the positive relationship between distribution and abundance of species. In Ricklefs, R. E. and Schluter, D. (eds), Species Diversity in Ecological Communities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 108–116.Google Scholar
Hole, D. G., Whittingham, M. J., Bradbury, R. B. et al.(2002). Widespread local house sparrow extinctions. Nature 418: 931–932.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holt, R. D., Lawton, J. H., Gaston, K. J. and Blackburn, T. M. (1997). On the relationship between range size and local abundance: back to basics. Oikos 78: 183–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, K. R. and Roush, R. T. (1993). Mate finding, dispersal, number released, and the success of biological control introductions. Ecological Entomology 18: 321–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeschke, J. M. and Strayer, D. L. (2006). Determinants of vertebrate invasion success in Europe and North America. Global Change Biology 12: 1608–1619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeschke, J. M. and Strayer, D. L. (2008). Are threat status and invasion success two sides of the same coin?Ecography 31: 124–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jønsson, K. A. and Feldså, J. (2006). A phylogenetic supertree of oscine passerine birds (Aves: Passeri). Zoologica Scripta 35: 149–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kark, S. and Sol, D. (2005). Establishment success across convergent Mediterranean ecosystems: an analysis of bird introductions. Conservation Biology 19: 1519–1527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koenig, W. D. (2003). European starlings and their effect on native cavity-nesting birds. Conservation Biology 17: 1134–1140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolar, C. S. and Lodge, D. M. (2001). Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16: 199–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Komers, P. E. and Curman, G. P. (2000). The effect of demographic characteristics on the success of ungulate re-introductions. Biological Conservation 93: 187–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krebs, C. J. (2001). Ecology: The Experimental Analysis of Distribution and Abundance. Boston, MA: Benjamin Cummings, Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.Google Scholar
Kyrkos, A., Wilson, J. D. and Fuller, R. J. (1998). Farmland habitat change and abundance of yellowhammers Emberiza citrinella: an analysis of Common Birds Census data. Bird Study 45: 232–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, K. A. and Klasing, K. C. (2004). A role for immunology in invasion biology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19: 523–529.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, K. A., Martin, L. B. and Wikelski, M. C. (2005). Responding to inflammatory challenges is less costly for a successful avian invader, the house sparrow (Passer domesticus), than its less-invasive congener. Oecologia 145: 243–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legendre, S., Clobert, J., Møller, A. P. and Sorci, G. (1999). Demographic stochasticity and social mating system in the process of extinction of small populations: the case of passerines introduced to New Zealand. American Naturalist 153: 449–463.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lever, C. (1987). Naturalised Birds of the World. Harlow, Essex: Longman Scientific and Technical.Google Scholar
Lever, C. (1994). Naturalized Animals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lockwood, J. L., Cassey, P. and Blackburn, T. (2005). The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 20: 223–228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Long, J. L. (1981). Introduced Birds of the World. New York: Universe Books.Google Scholar
Long, J. L. and Mawson, P. R. (1991). Species of introduced birds in Mediterranean Australia. In Groves, R. H. and di Castri, F. (eds) Biogeography of Mediterranean Invasions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 365–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLeod, C. J., Duncan, R. P., Parish, D. M. B., Wratten, S. D. and Hubbard, S. F. (2005a). Can increased niche opportunities and release from enemies explain the success of introduced yellowhammer populations in New Zealand?Ibis 147: 598–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLeod, C. J., Duncan, R. P., Parish, D. M. B., Wratten, S. D. and Hubbard, S. F. (2005b). Importance of niche quality for yellowhammer Emberiza citrinella nestling survival, development and body condition in its native and exotic ranges: the role of diet. Ibis 147: 270–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLeod, C. J., Newson, S. E., Blackwell, G. and Duncan, R. P. (2009). Enhanced niche opportunities: can they explain the success of New Zealand’s introduced bird species?Diversity and Distributions 15: 41–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLean, I. G. (1988). Breeding behaviour of the long-tailed cuckoo on Little Barrier Island. Notornis 35: 89–98.Google Scholar
Martin, L. B. and Fitzgerald, L. (2005). A taste for novelty in invading house sparrows, Passer domesticus. Behavioral Ecology 16: 702–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, T. E. and Li, P. (1992). Life-history traits of open- versus cavity-nesting birds. Ecology 73: 579–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merilä, J., Björklund, M. and Baker, A. J. (1996). The successful founder: genetics of introduced Carduelis chloris (greenfinch) populations in New Zealand. Heredity 77: 410–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Middleton, A. L. A. (1970a). Foods and feeding habits of the European goldfinch near Melbourne. Emu 70: 12–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Middleton, A. L. A. (1970b). The breeding biology of the goldfinch in south-eastern Australia. Emu 70: 159–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, D., Waas, J. R. and Innis, J. (2006). Do territorial and non-breeding Australian magpies Gymnorhina tibicen influence the local movements of rural birds in New Zealand?Ibis 148: 330–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nei, M., Maruyama, T. and Chakraborty, R. (1975). The bottleneck effect and genetic variability in populations. Evolution 29: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newsome, A. E. and Noble, I. R. (1986). Ecological and physiological characters of invading species. In Groves, R. H. and Burdon, J. J. (eds), Ecology of Biological Invasions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
Paterson, A. M., Palma, R. L. and Gray, R. D. (1999). How frequently do avian lice miss the boat? Implications for coevolutionary studies. Systematic Biology 48: 214–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pimm, S. L. (1991). The Balance of Nature? Ecological Issues in the Conservation of Species and Communities. Chicago, IL: University Of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rand, A. C. (1980). Factors responsible for the successful establishment of exotic avian species in southeastern Florida. Proceedings of the 9th Vertebrate Pest Conference, Lincoln, University of Nebraska, pp. 49–52.Google Scholar
Rhymer, J. M. and Simberloff, D. (1996). Extinction by hybridization and introgression. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 27: 83–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricciardi, A., Mack, R. N., Steiner, W. M. and Simberloff, D. (2000). Toward a global information system for invasive species. BioScience 50: 239–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Røskaft, E., Moksnes, A., Stokke, B. G., Bicik, V. and Moská, C. (2002). Aggression to dummy cuckoos by potential European cuckoo hosts. Behaviour 139: 613–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, S. I. (2001). Relic behaviours, coevolution and the retention versus loss of host defences after episodes of avian brood parasitism. Animal Behaviour 61: 95–107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sala, O. E., Chapin, III F. S., Armesto, J. J. et al. (2000). Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287: 1770–1774CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Savidge, J. A. (1987). Extinction of an island forest avifauna by an introduced snake. Ecology 68: 660–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sax, D. F. and Brown, J. H. (2000). The paradox of invasion. Global Ecology and Biogeography 9: 363–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shea, K. and Chesson, P. (2002). Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17: 170–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siriwardena, G. M., Crick, H. Q. P., Baillie, S. R. and Wilson, J. D. (2000). Agricultural land-use and the spatial distribution of granivorous lowland farmland birds. Ecography 23: 702–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, K. W. (2005). Has the reduction in nest-site competition from starlings Sturnus vulgaris been a factor in the recent increase of great spotted woodpecker Dendrocopos major numbers in Britain?Bird Study 52: 307–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snow, D. W. and Perrins, C. M. (1998). The Birds of the Western Palearctic, concise edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sol, D. (2007). Do successful invaders exist? Pre-adaptations to novel environments in terrestrial vertebrates. In Nentwig, W. (ed.), Biological Invasions. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer, pp. 127–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sol, D. and Lefebvre, L. (2000). Behavioural flexibility predicts invasion success in birds introduced to New Zealand. Oikos 90: 599–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sol, D., Duncan, R. P., Blackburn, T. M., Cassey, P. and Lefebvre, L. (2005). Big brains, enhanced cognition, and responses of birds to novel environments. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102: 5460–5465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sol, D., Timmermans, S. and Lefebvre, L. (2002). Behavioural flexibility and invasion success in birds. Animal Behaviour 63: 495–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorci, G., Møller, A. P. and Clobert, J. (1998). Plumage dichromatism of birds predicts introduction success in New Zealand. Journal of Animal Ecology 67: 263–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, B., Kutner, L. S. and Adams, J. S. (2000). Precious Heritage: The Status of Biodiversity in the United States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stevens, G. C. (1989). The latitudinal gradient in geographical range: how so many species coexist in the tropics. American Naturalist 133: 240–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strubbe, D. and Matthysen, E. (2007). Invasive ring-necked parakeets Psittacula krameri in Belgium: habitat selection and impact on native birds. Ecography 30: 578–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Summers-Smith, J. D. (1988). The Sparrows: A Study of the Genus Passer. Carlton, UK: T and A. D. Poyser.Google Scholar
Thomson, G. M. (1922). The Naturalisation of Plants and Animals in New Zealand. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, G. M. and Heath, M. F. (1994). Birds in Europe: Their Conservation Status. Conservation Series no. 3. Cambridge: BirdLife International.Google Scholar
Vall-llosera, M. and Sol, D. (2009). A global risk assessment for the success of bird introductions. Journal of Applied Ecology 46: 787–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Meij, M. A. A., de Bakker, M. A. G. and Bout, R. G. (2005). Phylogenetic relationships of finches and allies based on nuclear and mitochondrial DNA. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 34: 97–105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Riper, C., van Riper, C. G., Goff, M. L. and Laird, M. (1986). The epizootiology and ecological significance of malaria in Hawaiian land birds. Ecological Monographs 56: 327–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veltman, C. J., Nee, S. and Crawley, M. J. (1996). Correlates of introduction success in exotic New Zealand birds. American Naturalist, 147, 542–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, M. (1996). Biological Invasions. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Wolf, C. M., Garland, T.. and Griffith, B. (1998). Predictors of avian and mammalian translocation success: reanalysis with phylogenetically independent contrasts. Biological Conservation 86: 243–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×