Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T12:07:52.005Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Social relation and mutual influence analyses of children's interpersonal trust

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

By
Lucy R. Betts ,
Ken J. Rotenberg  and
Mark Trueman
Edited by
Ken J. Rotenberg
Lucy R. Betts
Affiliation:
(Nottingham Trent University),
Ken J. Rotenberg
Affiliation:
(Keele University), and
Mark Trueman
Affiliation:
(Keele University)
Ken J. Rotenberg
Affiliation:
Keele University
Get access

Summary

Interpersonal trust has been viewed as a crucial aspect of social functioning that originates in infant–caregiver interactions and affects psychosocial functioning across the life-span (Armsden and Greenberg, 1987; Erikson, 1963; Waters, Vaughn, Posada, and Kondo-Ikemura, 1995). Researchers have found that children's interpersonal trust is associated with various aspects of their psychosocial functioning. Specifically, trustworthiness in children has been found to be associated with, and longitudinally predictive of, the number of their friendships (Rotenberg, McDougall, Boulton, Vaillancourt, Fox, and Hymel, 2004) and their adjustment to school (Betts and Rotenberg, 2007; Betts, Rotenberg, and Trueman, 2009; Rotenberg, Michalik, Eisenberg, and Betts, 2008). Children's trust beliefs have been found to be associated with honesty (Wright and Kirmani, 1977), lack of depression (Lester and Gatto, 1990), academic achievement (Imber, 1973), and lack of loneliness (Rotenberg, MacDonald, and King, 2004). Rotenberg, Boulton, and Fox (2005) found that the trust beliefs of elementary school children were negatively associated with, and longitudinally predictive of, internalized maladjustment (loneliness, depression, and anxiety). Also, a curvilinear relationship was found whereby children with very high and those with very low trust beliefs were at additional risk for internalized maladjustment. Some researchers (see Chapter 2) have highlighted that interpersonal trust during childhood is dyadic and reciprocal in nature, but there is a scarcity of research addressing this hypothesis.

Type
Chapter
Information
Interpersonal Trust during Childhood and Adolescence , pp. 110 - 132
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albright, L., Kenny, D. A., and Malloy, T. E. (1988). Consensus in personality judgments at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 387–395.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Armsden, G. C. and Greenberg, M. T. (1987). The inventory of parent and peer attachment: Individual differences and their relationship to psychological well-being in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 16, 427–454.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Betts, L. R. (2005). The relationship between young children's trust and their school adjustment. PhD thesis, Keele University.Google Scholar
Betts, L. R. and Rotenberg, K. J. (2007). Trustworthiness, friendship and self-control: Factors that contribute to young children's school adjustment. Infant and Child Development, 16, 491–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betts, L. R. and Rotenberg, K. J. (2008). A social relations analysis of children's trust in their peers across the early years of school. Social Development, 17, 1039–1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betts, L. R., Rotenberg, K. J., and Trueman, M. (2006). Examining reciprocity of trust in young children's dyadic relationships. Poster presented at the British Psychological Society Social Section Annual Conference, Birmingham.Google Scholar
Betts, L. R., Rotenberg, K. J., and Trueman, M. (2009). An investigation of the impact of young children's self-knowledge of trustworthiness on school adjustment: A test of the Realistic Self-Knowledge and Positive Illusion models. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 27, 405–424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butler, J. K. (1986). Reciprocity of dyadic trust in close male–female relationships. Journal of Social Psychology, 126, 579–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buzzelli, C. A. (1988). The development of trust in children's relations with peers. Child Study Journal, 18, 33–46.Google Scholar
Campbell, L. and Kashy, D. A. (2002). Estimating actor, partner, and interaction effects for dyadic data using PROC MIXED and HLM: A user-friendly guide. Personal Relationships, 9, 327–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Card, N. A., Hodges, E. V. E., Little, T. D., and Hawley, P. H. (2005). Gender differences in peer nominations for aggression and social status. International Journal of Behavioural Development, 29, 146–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coie, J. D., Cillessen, A. H. N., Dodge, K. A., Hubbard, J. A., Schwartz, D., Lemerise, E. A., and Bateman, H. (1999). It takes two to fight: A test of relational factors and a method for assessing aggressive dyads. Developmental Psychology, 35, 1179–1188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Couch, L. L. and Jones, W. H. (1997). Measuring levels of trust. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 319–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and society (2nd edn.). New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Furman, W. and Bierman, K. L. (1984). Children's conceptions of friendship: A multimethod study of development changes. Developmental Psychology, 20, 925–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furman, W. and Buhrmester, D. (1985). Children's perceptions of the personal relationships in their social networks. Developmental Psychology, 21, 1016–1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, J. G. and Rempel, J. K. (1989). Trust in close relationships. In Hendrick, C. (ed.), Review of personality and social psychology: Group pro­cesses and intergroup relations (9th edn.) (pp. 187–220). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Hubbard, J. A., Dodge, K. A., Cillessen, A. H. N., Coie, J. D., and Schwartz, D. (2001). The dyadic nature of social information processing in boys' reactive and proactive aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 268–280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Imber, S. C. (1973). Relationship of trust to academic performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 145–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kashy, D. A. and Kenny, D. A. (2000). The analysis of data from dyads and groups. In Reis, H. T. and Judd, C. M. (eds.), Handbook of research methods in social personality psychology (pp. 451–477). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kenny, D. A. (1994a). Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. New York: Guilford Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Kenny, D. A. (1994b). Using the social relations model to understand relationships. In Erber, R. and Gilmour, R. (eds.), Theoretical framework for personal relationships (pp. 111–127). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Kenny, D. A. (1996). Models of non-independence in dyadic research. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 13, 279–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenny, D. A. (1998). SOREMO version 2. Retrieved from http://davidakenny.net/srm/srmp.htm on December 17, 2009.
Kenny, D. A. and Voie, L. (1984). The social relations model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 141–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenny, D. A. and Nasby, W. (1980). Splitting the reciprocity correlation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 249–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenny, D. A. and Xuan, A. (2002). WinSoReMo (computer software).
Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., and Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Kenny, D. A., Mannetti, L., Pierro, A., Livi, S., and Kashy, D. A. (2002). The statistical analysis of data from small groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 126–137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larzelere, R. E. and Huston, T. L. (1980). The dyadic trust scale: Toward understanding interpersonal trust in close relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42, 595–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lashley, B. R. and Kenny, D. A. (1998). Power estimation in social relations analyses. Psychological Methods, 3, 328–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lester, D. and Gatto, J. L. (1990). Interpersonal trust, depression, and suicidal ideation in teenagers. Psychological Reports, 67, 786.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malloy, T. E. and Kenny, D. A. (1986). The social relations model: An integrative method for personality research. Journal of Personality, 54, 199–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malloy, T. E., Sugarman, D. B., Montvilo, R. K., and Ben-Zeev, T. (1995). Children's interpersonal perceptions: A social relations analysis of perceiver and target effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 418–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malloy, T. E., Yarlas, A., Montvilo, R. K. and Sugarman, D. B. (1996). Agreement and accuracy in children's interpersonal perceptions: A social relations analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 692–702.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merrel, K. W. and Gimpel, G. A. (1998). Social skills of children and adolescents: Conceptualization, assessment and treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Moyer, J. E. and Kunz, J. T. (1975). Trust in everything. Young Children, 30, 107–112.
Parker, J. G. and Asher, S. R. (1993). Friendship and friendship quality in middle childhood: Links with peer group acceptance and feelings of loneliness and social dissatisfaction. Developmental Psychology, 29, 611–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, D. G., Kusel, S. J., and Perry, L. C. (1988). Victims of peer aggression. Developmental Psychology, 24, 807–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, H. S. and Lollis, S. P. (1989). A social relations analysis of toddle peer relationships. Child Development, 60, 1082–1091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotenberg, K. J. (1984). Sex differences in children's trust in peers. Sex Roles, 11, 953–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotenberg, K. J. (1986). Same-sex patterns and sex differences in the trust-value basis of children's friendship. Sex Roles, 15, 613–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotenberg, K. J. (1991). Children's interpersonal trust: Sensitivity to lying, deception, and promise violations. NY: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotenberg, K. J. (1994). Loneliness and interpersonal trust. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 13, 152–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotenberg, K. J. (2001). Interpersonal trust across the lifespan. In N. J. Smelser and Baltes, P. B. (eds.), International encyclopedia of social and behavioral sciences (pp. 7866–7868). New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Rotenberg, K. J. and Pilipenko, T. A. (1983–1984). Mutuality, temporal consistency, and helpfulness in children's trust in peers. Social Cognition, 2, 235–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotenberg, K. J., Boulton, M. J., and Fox, C. L. (2005). Cross-sectional and longitudinal relations among children's trust beliefs, psychological maladjustment, and social relationships during childhood: Are very high as well as very low trusting children at risk?Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33, 595–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotenberg, K. J., Fox, C., Green, S., Ruderman, L., Slater, K., Stevens, K., and Carlo, G. (2005). Construction and validation of a children's interpersonal trust belief scale. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 23, 271–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotenberg, K. J., MacDonald, K. J., and King, E. V. (2004). The relationship between loneliness and interpersonal trust during middle childhood. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 165, 233–249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rotenberg, K. J., McDougall, P., Boulton, M. J., Vaillancourt, T., Fox, C., and Hymel, S. (2004). Cross-sectional and longitudinal relations among relational trustworthiness, social relationships, and psychological adjustment during childhood and adolescence in the UK and Canada. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 88, 46–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotenberg, K. J., Michalik, N., Eisenberg, N., and Betts, L. R. (2008). The relations among young children's peer-reported trustworthiness, inhibitory control, and preschool adjustment. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23, 288–298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rotter, J. B. (1967). A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. Journal of Personality, 35, 651–665.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rotter, J. B. (1980). Interpersonal trust, trustworthiness and gullibility. American Psychologist, 35, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, B. H. (2000). Friends and enemies: Peer relations in childhood. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Scott, C. L. (1980). Interpersonal trust: A comparison of attitudinal and situational factors. Human Relations, 33, 805–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shannon, K. and Kafer, N. F. (1984). Reciprocity, trust and vulnerability in neglected and rejected children. Journal of Psychology, 117, 65–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpkins, S. D. and Parke, R. D. (2002). Do friends and nonfriends behave differently? A social relations analysis of children's behavior. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 48, 263–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, R. M., Kenny, D. A., and Stoto, M. (1979). A new round-robin analysis of variance for social interaction data. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1742–1757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waters, E., Vaughn, B. E., Posada, G., and Kondo-Ikemura, K. (eds.) (1995). Caregiving, cultural, and cognitive perspectives on security-based behavior and working models. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 60 (2–3, Serial No. 244).
Whitley, B. E., Schofield, J. W., and Snyder, H. N. (1984). Peer preferences in a desegregated school: A round-robin analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 799–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, T. L. and Kirmani, A. (1977). Interpersonal trust, trustworthiness, and shoplifting in high school. Psychological Reports, 41, 1165–1166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, T. L. and Sharp, E. G. (1979). Content and grammatical sex bias on the interpersonal trust scale and differential trust toward women and men. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 72–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woody, E. and Sadler, P. (2005). Structural equation models for interchangeable dyads: Being the same makes a difference. Psychological Methods, 10, 139–158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zak, A. M., Gold, J. A., Ryckman, R. M., and Lenney, E. (1988). Assessment of trust in intimate relationships and the self-perception process. Journal of Social Psychology, 138, 217–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×