Abi-Saab, G. (2010). “The Appellate Body and Treaty Interpretation,” in Fitzmaurice, M., Elias, O. and Merkouris, P., eds., Treaty Interpretation and the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: 30 Years On. Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar

Alexandrowicz, C. H. (1973). The Law Making Functions of the Specialized Agencies of the United Nations. Sydney: Angus and Robertson.Google Scholar

Álvarez, J. E. (2005). International Organizations as Law-Makers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Andonova, L. and Elsig, M. (2011). “Informal International Lawmaking: A Conceptual View from International Relations,” in Pauwelyn, J., Wessel, R. and Wouters, J., eds., Informal International Lawmaking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Appleton, A. and Heiskanen, V. (2004). “The Sardines Decision: Fish without Chips?” in Mitchel, D., ed., Challenges and Prospects for the WTO. London: Cameron May.Google Scholar

Arcuri, A. (2013). “The TBT Agreement and Private Standards,” in Epps, T. and Trebilcock, M. J., eds., Research Handbook on WTO and Technical Barriers to Trade. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Arnold, D. (2011). “The Codex Alimentarius Commission: A View from Practice,” in Dilling, O., Herberg, M. and Winter, G., eds., Transnational Administrative Rule Making. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar

Arts, B. and Kerwer, D. (2013). “Beyond Legalization? How Global Standards Work?” in Arts, B. et al., Forest and Nature Governance. A Practice Based Approach. New York and London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Auld, G. and Cashore, B. (2012). “The Forest Stewardship Council,” in Reed, D., Utting, P. and Mukherjee-Reed, A., eds., Business Regulation and Non-State Actors: Whose Standards? Whose Development? Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Barton, J. Barton, J. H., Goldstein, J., Steinberg, R. H. and Josling, T. E. (2006). The Evolution of the Trade Regime: Politics, Law, and Economics of the GATT and the WTO. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Beisheim, M. and Dingwerth, K. (2010). “The Link between Standard-Setting NGOs: Legitimacy and Effectiveness: An Exploration of Social Mechanism,” in Steffek, J. and Hahn, K., eds., Evaluating Transnational NGOs: Legitimacy, Accountability, Representation. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar

Berman, A. and Wessel, R. A. (2012). “The International Legal Form and Status of Informal International Lawmaking Bodies: Consequences for Accountability,” in Pauwelyn, J., Wessel, R. and Wouters, J., eds., Informal International Lawmaking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Black, J. (2009). “Legitimacy, Accountability and Polycentric Regulations: Dilemmas, Trilemmas and Organizational Response,” in Peters, A., Koechlin, L. and Zinkeragel, G. F, eds., Non-State Actors as Standard Setters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Blagescu, M. and Lloyd, R. (2006). “Accountability of Transnational Actors: Is There Scope for Cross Sector Principles?” in Peters, A., Koechlin, L. and Zinkeragel, G. F., eds., Non-State Actors as Standard Setters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Blind, K. (2004). The Economics of Standards: Theory, Evidence, Policy. Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Bodansky, D. (2008). “The Concept of Legitimacy in International Law,” in Rüdiger, W. and Volker, R., eds., Legitimacy in International Law. New York and London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boisrobert, C., Stjepanovic, A., Oh, S. and Lelieveld, H. (2010). Ensuring Global Food Safety: Exploring Global Harmonization. Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar

Bossis, G. (2005). La sécurité sanitaire des aliments en droit international et communautaire. Raports croisés at perspectives d’harmonisation. Bruxelles: Bruylant, pp. 111–113.Google Scholar

Boström, M. and Hallström, K. T. (2015). “Forest Stewardship Council,” in Lechner, F. J. and Boli, J., eds., The Globalization Reader. Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar

Boyle, A. and Chinkin, C. (2007), The Making of International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Braithwaite, J. (1994a). “Lessons for Regulatory Cooperation,” in OECD, Regulatory Cooperation for an Interdependent World. Paris: Public Management Studies, OECD Publishing.Google Scholar

Braithwaite, J.(1994b). “Prospects for Win-Win International Rapprochement of Regulation,” in OECD, Regulatory Cooperation for an Interdependent World. Paris: Public Management Studies, OECD Publishing.Google Scholar

Buck, J. (2009). “International Electrotechnical Commission,” in Tietje, C. and Brouder, A., eds., Handbook of Transnational Economic Governance Regimes. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar

Busch, L. (2011). Standards: Recipes for Reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Busch, L. and Bingen, J. (2006). “Introduction: A New World of Standards,” in Bingen, J. and Busch, L., eds., Agricultural Standards: The Shape of the Global Food and Fiber System. New York and London: Springer.Google Scholar

Büthe, T. (2010). “The Power of Norms; the Norms of Power: Who Governs International Electrical and Electronic Technology?” in Avant, D., Finnemore, M. and Sell, S., eds., Who Governs the Globe? New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Büthe, T. and Harris, N. (2011). “The Codex Alimentarius Commission: A Hybrid Public–Private Regulator,” in Hale, T. and Held, D., eds., Handbook on Innovations in Transnational Governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Büthe, T. and Mattli, W. (2010). “International Standards and Standard-Setting Bodies,” in Coen, D., Wilson, G. and Grant, W., eds., Oxford Handbook on Business and Government. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Büthe, T. and Mattli, W.(2011). The New Global Rulers: The Privatization of Regulation in the World Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Button, C. (2004). The Power to Protect: Trade, Health and Uncertainty in the WTO, Studies in International Trade Law, vol. 2. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar

Cadman, T. (2011). Quality and Legitimacy of Global Governance: Case Lessons from Forestry. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calliess, V., Nolte, C. and Stroll, G., eds. (2007). Coalitions of the Willing: Avant garde or Threat? Cologne: Carl Heymanns Verlag.Google Scholar

Chinkin, C. (2000). “Normative Development in the International Legal System,” in Shelton, D., ed., Commitment and Compliance: The Role of Non-Binding Norms in the International Legal System. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Clark, I. (2005). Legitimacy in International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Coglianese, C. (2000). “Globalization and the Design of International Institutions,” in Nye, J. S. and Donahue, J. D., eds., Governance in a Globalizing World. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar

Coglianese, C., Finkel, A. and Zaring, D. (2009). Import Safety: Regulatory Governance in the Global Economy. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Cutler, C. (2003). Private Power and Global Authority: Transnational Merchant and the Global Political Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dann, P. and von Engelhardt, M. (2011). “Legal Approaches to Global Governance and Accountability: Informal Lawmaking, International Public Authority and Global Administrative Compared,” in Pauwelyn, J., Wessel, R. and Wouters, J., eds., Informal International Lawmaking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

De Burca, G., Kilpatrick, C. and Scott, J. (2014). Critical Legal Perspectives on Global Governance: Liber Amicorum David M. Trubek. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar

Desta, M. (2012). “GATT/WTO Law and International Standards: An Example of Soft Law Instruments Hardening Up?” in Bjorklund, A. K. and Reinisch, A., eds., International Investment Law and Soft Law. London: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Djelic, M. L. and Sahlin, A. K., eds. (2006). Transnational Governance Institutional Dynamics of Regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drezner, D. (2007). All Politics Is Global: Explaining International Regulatory Regimes. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Dunoff, J. L. and Trachtman, J. P. (2009). Ruling the World? Constitutionalism, International Law and Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Echols, M. A. (2001). Food Safety and the WTO: The Interplay of Culture, Science and Technology. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar

Edwards, M. and Zadek, S. (1999). “Governing the Provision of Global Public Goods: The Role and Legitimacy of Non-state Actors,” in Kaul, I., Grunberg, I. and Stern, M., eds., Global Public Goods: International Cooperation in the 21st Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Egan, M. (2001). Constructing a European Market: Standards, Regulation and Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Egyedi, T. M. (2010). “On the Implications of Competing Standards,” in The Pros and Cons of Standard Setting. Stockholm: Swedish Competition Authority.Google Scholar

Eicher, L. (1987), “Technical Regulations and Standards,” in Finger, M. and Olechowski, A., eds., The Uruguay Round: A Handbook for the Multilateral Trade Negotiations. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar

Falke, J. (1996). “Standardization by Professional Organizations,” in Winter, G., ed., Sources and Categories of European Union Law. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar

Gale, F. and Haward, M. (2011). Global Commodity Governance: State Response to Sustainable Forest and Fisheries Certification. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gandal, N. (2001). “Quantifying the Trade Impact of Compatibility Standards and Barriers: An Industrial Organization Perspective,” in Wilson, J. and Maskus, K. E., eds., Quantifying the Impact of Technical Barriers to Trade: Can It Be Done? Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Grundman, R. and Sther, N. (2012). The Power of Scientific Knowledge: From Research to Public Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Guzman, A. T. and Pauwelyn, J. (2009). International Trade Law. The Hague: Aspen Publisher Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar

Hallström, K. T. (2004). Organizing International Standardization: ISO and the IASC in Quest of Authority. London: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.Google Scholar

Hardfiled, G. K. (2009). “The Public and the Private in the Provision of Law for Global Transactions,” in Gressner, V., ed., Contractual Certainty in International Trade: Empirical Studies and Theoretical Debates on Institutional Support for Global Economic Exchanges. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar

Herwig, A. (2011). “The Contribution of Global Administrative Law to Enhancing the Legitimacy of the Codex Alimentarius Commission,” in Dilling, O., Herberg, M. and Winter, G., eds., Transnational Administrative Rule Making. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar

Horn, H. and Weiler, J. H. H. (2005). “European Communities-Trade Description of Sardines: Textualism and Its Discontent,” in Horn, H. and Mavroidis, P., eds., The WTO Case Law of 2002. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Howse, R. (2011). “A New Device for Creating International Legal Normativity: The WTO Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement and ‘International Standards,’” in Joerges, C. and Petersmann, E.-U., eds., Constitutionalism, Multilevel Trade Governance and International Economic Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar

Hüller, T. and Maier, L. (2011). “Fixing the Codex? Global Food – Safety Governance Under Review,” in Joerges, C. and Petersmann, E.-U., eds., Constitutionalism, Multilevel Trade Governance and International Economic Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar

International Trade Centre (2011). The Interplay of Public and Private Standards. Geneva: International Trade Centre.Google Scholar

Jacobs, S. (1994). “Regulatory Co-operation for an Interdependent World: Issues for Government in OECD,” in Regulatory Cooperation for an Interdependent World. Paris: Public Management Studies, OECD Publishing.Google Scholar

Jaffe, S. and Henson, S. (2005). “Agrofood Exports from Developing Countries: The Challenges Posed by Standards,” in Askoy, A. M. and Beghin, J. C., eds., Global Agricultural Trade and Developing Countries. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar

Josling, T., Roberts, D. and Hassan, A. (2000). The Beef-Hormone Dispute and Its Implications for Trade Policy. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University.Google Scholar

Kaul, I. and Le Goulven, K. (1999). “Institutional Options for Producing Global Public Goods,” in Kaul, I., Grunberg, I. and Stern, M., eds., Global Public Goods: International Cooperation in the 21st Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kaul, I. and Mendoza, R. (2003). “Advancing the Concept of Public Goods,” in Kaul, I., Conceição, P., le Goulven, K. and Mendoza, R., eds., Providing Global Public Goods: Managing Globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kennedy, K. C. (2006). “The World Trade Organization: Ultimate Arbiter of International Sanitary and Phytosanitary Standards?” in Bingen, J. and Busch, L., eds., Agricultural Standards: The Scope of the Global Food and Fiber System. New York and London: Springer.Google Scholar

Kieffer, B. (2008). L’Organisation Mondiale du Commerce et l’évolution du droit international publique. Larcier.Google Scholar

Kirton, J. and Trebilcock, M., eds. (2004). Hard choices, Soft Law: Voluntary Standards in Global Trade, Environment and Social Governance. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Klabbers, J. (2013). International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koechlin, P., Förster, T. and Xinkernagel, F., eds. (2009). Non-State Actors and Standard Setters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Komives, K. and Jackson, A. (2014). “Introduction to Voluntary Sustainability Standard Systems,” in Schmitz-Hoffman, D. C., Schmidt, M., Hansmann, B. and Palekhov, D., eds., Voluntary Standard Systems: A Contribution to Sustainable Development. New York and London: Springer.Google Scholar

Kudrayavstev, A. (2013). “The TBT Agreement in Context,” in Epps, T. and Trebilcock, M. J., eds., Research Handbook on the WTO and Technical Barriers to Trade. London: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Lassalle-de Salins, M. (2012). Lobbying de l’agroalimentaire et normes internationales: le cas du Codex Alimentarius. Paris: Éditions Quae.Google Scholar

Leibfried, S. (2010). “To Tame and to Frame,” in von Bogdandy, A., Dann, P. and Goldmann, M., eds., The Exercise of Public Authority by International Institutions: Advanced International Institutional Law. New York and London: Springer.Google Scholar

Leive, D. M. (1976). International Regulatory Regimes: Case Studies in Health, Meteorology, and Food, Volume 1. Lexington, KY: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Lindblom, A.-K. (2005). Non-Governmental Organizations in International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Liu, H.-W. (2015). Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Standards and World Trade: Understanding and Managing Global Friction. PhD Thesis, IHEID, Thesis 1103.Google Scholar

Loya, T. A. and Boli, J. (1999). “Standardization in the World Polity: Technical Regulations over Power,” in Boli, J. and Thomas, G. M., eds., Constructing World Culture: International Nongovernmental Organizations since 1875. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Maljean-Dubois, S. and Echelar, E. (2007). “World Trade and International Normalization: Codex Alimentarius,” in Byttebier, K, van der Borght, K. and May, C., eds., WTO Obligations and Opportunities: Challenges of Implementation. London: Cameron May.Google Scholar

Mankiw, N. G. (2009). Principles of Economics, vol. 1. Andover: South-Western Cengage Learning.Google Scholar

Mankiw, N. G. and Taylor, M. P. (2011). Economics. Andover: South-Western Cengage Learning.Google Scholar

Marceau, G. and Trachtman, J. P. (2004). “GATT, TBT and SPS: A Map of WTO Law Domestic Regulation of Goods,” in Ortino, F. and Peterman, E.-U., eds., The WTO Dispute Settlement System 1995–2003. Studies in Transnational Economic Law, vol. 18. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar

Masson-Matlhee, M. D. (2007). The Codex Alimentarius Commission and Its Standards. The Hague:TMC Asser Press.Google Scholar

Mattli, W. (2003). “Public and Private Governance in Setting International Standards,” in Kahler, M. and Lake, D., eds., Governance in Global Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Mayeda, G. (2013). “The TBT Agreement and Developing Countries,” in Epps, T. and Trebilcock, M., eds., Research Handbook on the WTO and Technical Barriers to Trade. London: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

McGovern, E. (1986). International Trade Regulation: GATT, the United States and the European Community. Exeter: Globefield Press.Google Scholar

McGrady, B. (2011). Trade and Public Health: The WTO, Tobacco, Alcohol, and Diet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mehta, R. and George, J. (2005). Food Safety Regulation Concerns and Trade: A Developing Country Perspective. Delhi: Macmillan India.Google Scholar

Meidinger, E. (2007). “Beyond Westphalia: Competitive Legalization in Emerging Transnational Regulatory Systems,” in Brütsch, C. and Lehmkuhl, D., eds., Law and Legalization in Transnational Relations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Messerlin, P. (2001). Measuring the Costs of Protection in Europe: European Commercial Policy in 2000s. Institute for International Economics Press.Google Scholar

Murphy, C. N. and Yates, J. (2009). The International Organization for Standardization (ISO): Global Governance through Voluntary Consensus. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Nakawa, J. (2011). International Harmonization of Economic Regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Nanz, P. (2011). “Democratic Legitimacy of Transnational Trade Governance: A View from Political Theory,” in Joerges, C. and Petersmann, E.-U., eds., Constitutionalism, Multilevel Trade Governance and International Economic Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar

Nickel, R. (2011). “Legal Patterns of Global Governance: Participatory Transnational Governance,” in Joerges, C. and Petersmann, E.-U., eds., Constitutionalism, Multilevel Trade Governance and International Economic Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar

Nielse, S. S. (2009). Food Analysis. New York and London: Springer.Google Scholar

Nowrot, K. (2009). “Forest Stewardship Council,” in Tietje, C., ed., Handbook of Transnational Economic Governance Regimes. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, J. (2011). “Non-Traditional Patterns of Global Regulation: Is the WTO ‘Missing the Boat’?” in Joerges, C. and Petersmann, E.-U., eds., Constitutionalism, Multilevel Trade Governance and International Economic Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, J.(2012). “Informal International Lawmaking: Framing the Concept and Research Questions,” in Pauwelyn, J., Wessel, R. and Wouters, J., eds., Informal International Lawmaking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, J., Wessel, R. A. and Wouters, J. (2012). “An Introduction to Informal International Law-Making,” in Pauwelyn, J., Wessel, R. A. and Wouters, J., eds., Informal International Lawmaking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pearson, K. (1990). “The Role of ASTM in Voluntary Standards,” in Estrin, N., ed., The Medical Device Industry: Science, Technology and Regulation in a Competitive Environment. New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar

Peters, A., Koechlin, L. and Zinkeragel, G. F. (2009). “Non-State Actors as Standard Setters: Framing the Issue in an Interdisciplinary Fashion,” in Peters, A., Koechlin, L. and Zinkeragel, G. F., eds., Non-State Actors as Standard Setters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Randell, A. (2000). “International Food Standards: The Work of Codex,” in Rees, N. and Watson, D., eds., International Standards for Food Safety. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publishers.Google Scholar

Rosenau, J. N. (2006). The Study of World Politics: Globalization and Governance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Rosenau, J. N. and Czempiel, E. O. (1992). Governance without Government: Order and Change in the World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Roth-Arriaza, N. (2000). “‘Soft Law’ in a ‘Hybrid’ Organization: The International Organization for Standardization,” in Shelton, D., ed., Commitment and Compliance: The Role of Non-Binding Norms in the International Legal System. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ruiter, D. W. and Wessel, R. A. (2011). “The Legal Nature of International Law: A Legal Theoretical Exercise,” in Pauwelyn, J., Wessel, R. and Wouters, J., eds., Informal International Lawmaking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Russell, A. (2005). “Standardization in History: A Review Essay with an Eye to the Future,” in Bolin, S., ed., The Standards Edge: Future Generations. Ann Arbor, MI: Sheridan Books.Google Scholar

Salazar, M., Miller, J., Busch, L. and Mascarenhas, M. (2006). “The Indivisibility of Science, Policy and Ethics: Starlink Corn and the Making of Standards,” in Bingen, J. and Burch, L., eds., Agricultural Standards: The Shape of the Global Food and Fiber System. New York and London: Springer.Google Scholar

Schepel, H. (2005). The Constitution of Private Governance: Product Standards in Regulating the Integrated Markets. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar

Schepel, H.(2011). “The Empire Drains: Sources of Legal Recognition of Private Standardization under the TBT Agreement,” in Joerges, C. and Petersmann, E.-U., eds., Constitutionalism, Multilevel Trade Governance and International Economic Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar

Schuppert, F., ed. (2006). Global Governance and the Role of Non-State Actors. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar

Scott, J. (2007). The WTO Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures: A Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Shapiro, C. (2001). “Setting Compatibility Standards: Cooperation or Collision?” in Dreyfuss, R., Zimmerman, D. and First, H., eds., Expanding the Boundaries of Intellectual Property for the Knowledge of Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Slaughter, A.-M. (2004). A New World Order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Struck, C. (2014). Product Regulations and Standards in WTO Law. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar

Sturm, D. (2001). Product Standards, Trade Dispute and Protectionism. London: Centre for Economic Performance.Google Scholar

Teubner, G., Joerges, C. and Sand, I.-J. (2004). Transnational Governance and Constitutionalism. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar

Van Damme, I. (2009). Treaty Interpretation by the WTO Appellate Body. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Vogel, D. and Kagan, R. (2000). Dynamics of Regulatory Change: How Globalization Affects National Regulatory Policy. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Wagner, M. (2013). “International Standards,” in Epps, T. and Trebilcock, M. J., eds., Research Handbook on the WTO and Technical Barriers to Trade. London: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Wheatley, S. (2009). “Democratic Governance beyond the State: The Legitimacy of Non-State Actors as Standard Setters,” in Peters, A., Koechlin, L. and Zinkeragel, G. F., eds., Non-State Actors as Standard Setters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wilson, J. S. (2002). “Standards, Regulations and Trade, WTO Rules and Developing Countries’ Concerns,” in Hoekman, B., Matt, A. and English, P., eds., Development, Trade and the WTO: A Handbook. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar

Wirth, D. (2000). “Compliance with Non-Binding Norms of Trade and Finance,” in Shelton, D., ed., Commitment and Compliance: The Role of Non-Binding Norms in the International Legal System. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wirth, D.(2013). “The International Organization for Standardization: Private Voluntary Standards as Swords and Shields,” in van Calster, G. and Prévost, D., eds., Research Handbook on Environment, Health and the WTO. London: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Wolfrum, R., Stoll, P. T. and Seibert-Fohr, A., eds. (2007). WTO, Technical Barriers and SPS Measures. Leiden, Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar

Wood, S. (2012). “The International Organization for Standardization,” in Reed, D., Utting, P. and Mukherjee-Reed, A., eds., Business Regulation and Non-State Actors: Whose Standards? Whose Development? London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Wouters, J., Marx, A. and Hachez, N. (2012). “Private Standards, Global Governance and International Trade: The Case of Global Food Governance,” in Marx, A., Maertens, M., Swinnen, J. and Wouters, J., eds., Private Standards and Global Governance: Economic, Legal and Political Perspectives. Leuven: Global Governance.Google Scholar

Yearwood, R. (2012). The Interaction between the World Trade Organization Law (WTO) and External International Law: The Constrained Openness of WTO Law (A Prologue to a Theory). London:Routledge.Google Scholar

Young, O. R. and Levy, M. A. (1999). “The Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes,” in Young, O. R., ed., The Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes, Causal Connections and Behavioral Mechanism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Zemernek, K. (1983). “Majority Rule and Consensus Technique in Law-Making Diplomacy,” in Donald, R. and Douglas, J., eds., The Structure and Process of International Law: Essays in Legal Philosophy. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar

Zleptnig, S. (2010). Non-Economic Objectives in WTO Law: Justification Provisions of GATT, GATS, SPS and TBT Agreements. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar

Zúñiga Schroder, H. (2011). Harmonization, Equivalence and Mutual Recognition of Standards in WTO Law. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar

Abbot, K. and Snidal, D. (2008). The Governance Triangle: Regulatory Standards Institutions and the Shadow of the State. Paper presented at the annual meeting of The Law and Society Association, Hilton Bonaventure, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, May 27.Google Scholar

Abbot, K. and Snidal, D.(2009). “Strengthening International Regulation through Transnational New Governance: Overcoming the Orchestration Deficit.” Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, vol. 42, pp. 501–578.Google Scholar

Abbot, K. and Snidal, D.(2011). “International ‘Standards’ and International Governance.” Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 345–370.Google Scholar

Acemoglu, D., Gancia, G. and Zilibotti, F. (2010). Competing Engines of Growth: Innovation and Standardization. NBER Working Paper Series, Working Paper 15958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allen, R. and Sriram, R. (2000). “The Role of Standards in Innovation.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 64, pp. 171–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baldwin, R. (2000). Regulatory Protectionism, Developing Nations and a Two-Tier World Trade System. Brooking Trade Forum, Project Muse.Google Scholar

Baller, S. (2007). Trade Effects of Regional Standards Liberalization: A Heterogeneous Firms Approach. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4121, The World Bank.Google Scholar

Balzarova, M. and Catska, P. (2012). “Stakeholders’ Influence and Contribution to Social Standards Development: The Case of Multiple Stakeholder Approach to ISO 26000 Development.” Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 111, pp. 265–279.Google Scholar

Battigalli, P. and Maggi, G. (2003). International Agreements on Product Standard: An Incomplete Contracting Theory. NBER Working Paper No. 9533.Google Scholar

Berman, P. S. (2002). “The Globalization of Jurisdiction.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 151, pp. 311–529.Google Scholar

Bernstein, S. and Cashore, B. (2007). “Can Non-State Global Governance Be Legitimate? An Analytical Framework.” Regulation and Governance, vol. 1, pp. 347–371.Google Scholar

Bernstein, S. and Hannah, E. (2008). “Non-State Global Standard Setting and the WTO: Legitimacy and the Need for Regulatory Space.” Journal of International Economic Law, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 375–608.Google Scholar

Berthelot, Y. and Rayment, P. (2007). Looking Back and Peering Forward: A Short History of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, 1947–2007. Economic Commission for Europe.Google Scholar

Besen, S. and Farrell, J. (1994). “Choosing How to Compete: Strategies and Tactics in Standardization.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 117–131.Google Scholar

Bevilacqua, D. (2006). The Codex Alimentarius Commission: Increasing Accountability through Transparency. Institute of International Law and Justice, New York University. www.iilj.org/gal/documents/BevilacquaCodex.doc.Google Scholar

Bevilacqua, D.(2007). “Il principio di tranparenza come strumento di accountability nella Codex Alimentarius Commission.” Rivista Trimestrale di Diritto Pubblico, vol. 57.Google Scholar

Black, J. (2001). “Decentring Regulation: Understanding the Role of Regulations and Self-Regulations in a ‘Post-Regulatory’ World.” Current Legal Problems, vol. 54, pp. 103–146.Google Scholar

Blind, K. (2011). “An Economic Analysis of Standards Competition: The Example of the ISO ODF and OOXML Standards.” Telecommunications Policy, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 373–381.Google Scholar

Blind, K. and Jungmittag, J. (2005). The Impact of Standards on Productivity in Manufacturing: A Panel Approach Covering Four Countries and Twelve Sectors. The Empirical Economics of Standards. DTI Economic Papers No. 12.Google Scholar

Blind, K. and Jungmittag, J.(2008). “The Impact of Patents and Standards on Macroeconomic Growth: A Panel Approach Covering Four Countries and 12 Sectors.” Journal of Productivity Analysis, vol. 147, pp. 51–60.Google Scholar

Bohman, J. (1999). “International Regimes and Democratic Governance: Political Equality and Influence Global in Global Institutions.” International Affairs, vol. 75.Google Scholar

Bongers, C. (1982). “Optimal Size Selection in Standardization: A Case Study.” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 33, no. 9, pp. 499–513.Google Scholar

Bonson, Y. (2008). “Institutionalizing Public Participation in WTO Decision Making: Some Conceptual Hurdles and Avenues.” Journal of International Economic Law, vol. 11, pp. 751–777.Google Scholar

Boström, M. and Hallström, K. T. (2013). “Global Multistakeholder Standard Setters: How Fragile Are They?” Journal of Global Ethics, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 93–110.Google Scholar

Bovens, M. (2006). Analyzing and Assessing Public Accountability: A Conceptual Framework. European Governance Papers, volume C-06–01.Google Scholar

Buchanan, A. and Keohane, R. (2006). “The Legitimacy of Global Governance.” Ethics and International Affairs, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 405–437.Google Scholar

Büthe, T. (2008). “The Globalization of Health and Safety Standards: Delegation of Regulatory Authority in the SPS Agreement of the 1994 Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization.” Law and Contemporary Problems, vol. 7, pp. 405–437.Google Scholar

Büthe, T.(2010). “Engineering Uncontested? The Origins and Institutional Development of the International Electrotechnical Commission.” Business and Politics, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 1–64.Google Scholar

den Butter, F., Grott, S. and Lazrak, F. (2007). The Transaction Cost Perspective on Standards as a Source of Trade and Productivity Growth. Tinbergen, Institute Discussion Paper 090/3.Google Scholar

den Butter, F. and Mosch, R. (2003). Trade, Trust and Transaction Costs. Tinbergen Institute Working Paper No. 2003–082/3.Google Scholar

Cafaggi, F. (2008). Product Safety, Private Standard Setting and Information Networks. Working Paper 2008/17, EUI.Google Scholar

Cafaggi, F.(2011). “New Foundations of Transnational Private Regulation.” Journal of Law and Society, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 20–49.Google Scholar

Cahsore, B. (2002). “Legitimacy and the Privatization of Environmental Governance: How Non-State Market-Driven (NSMD) Governance Systems Gain Rule Making Authority.” Governance, vol. 4, pp. 503–529.Google Scholar

Cárdenas Castañeda, F. A. (2013). “A Call for Rethinking the Sources of International Law: Soft Law and the Other Side of the Coin.” Anuario Mexicano de Derecho Internacional, vol. XIII, pp. 355–403.Google Scholar

Casella, A. (2001). “Product Standards and International Trade: Harmonization through Private Coalitions?” KYKLOS, vol. 54, pp. 243–244.Google Scholar

Cassese, S. (2004). Shrimps, Turtles and Procedure: Global Standards for National Administration. Institute for International Law & Justice, Global Administrative Law Series. Working Paper No. 2004/4.Google Scholar

Centre for International Trade, Economics & Environment (2003). Dealing with Protectionist Standard Setting: Effectiveness of WTO, SPS and TBT. Research Report.Google Scholar

Cham, B. (2008). A Developing Nation: Why Standardization Matters. CMGT 564 Research Paper, Strategic Standardization.Google Scholar

Charnovitz, S. (2005). International Standards and the WTO. The George Washington University Law School. Legal Studies Research Paper No. 133.Google Scholar

Chen, M. and Mattoo, A. (2004). Regionalism in Standards: Good or Bad for Trade. Policy Research Working Papers, The World Bank.Google Scholar

Chinkin, C. (1989). “The Challenges of Soft Law: Development and Change in Soft Law.” International and Comparative Law Quarterly, vol. 38, pp. 850–866.Google Scholar

Christoforou, T. (2000). “Settlement of Science-Based Trade Disputes in the WTO: A Critical Review of the Developing Case Law in the Face of Scientific Uncertainty.” New York University Environmental Law Journal, vol. 8, pp. 622–648.Google Scholar

Clapp, J. (1998). “The Privatization of Global Environmental Governance: ISO 14000 and the Developing World.” Global Governance, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 295–316.Google Scholar

Cogilanese, C. (1999). “The Limits of Consensus.” Environment, vol. 41, pp. 1505–1506.Google Scholar

Czubala, W., Shepherd, B. and Wilson, J. (2007). Help or Hindrance? The Impact of Harmonized Standards from African Exports. Policy Research Working Paper 4400, The World Bank.Google Scholar

De Bellis, M. (2011). “Public Law and Private Regulators in the Global Legal Space.” International Journal of Constitutional Law, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 425–448.Google Scholar

De Búrca, G. (2008). “Developing Democracy beyond the State.” Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, vol. 46, pp. 211–278.Google Scholar

DeLacey, B. J., Herman, K., Kiron, D. and Lerner, J. (2006). Strategic Behavior in Standard-Setting Organizations. Harvard NOM Working Paper.Google Scholar

Delimatsis, P. (2014). “Relevant International Standards” and “Recognized Standardization Bodies” under the TBT Agreement. TILEC Discussion Paper No. 2014–031, September.Google Scholar

Delimatsis, P.(2014). Into the Abyss of Standard-Setting: An Analysis of Procedural and Substantive Guarantees within ISO. TILEC Discussion Paper No. 2014–042, November.Google Scholar

DeNardis, L. and Tam, E. (2009). “Open Documents and Democracy: A Political Basis for Open Document Standards.” Indiana Journal Law and Technology, vol. 5, pp. 5–18.Google Scholar

Deutsches Institut für Normung (2000). Economic Benefits of Standardization. Berlin: Deutsches Institut für Normung.Google Scholar

Diller, J. M. (2012). “Private Standardization in Public International Law Making.” Michigan Journal of International Law, vol. 33, pp. 481–536.Google Scholar

Dingwerth, K. (2008). “North-South Parity in Global Governance: The Affirmative Procedures of the Forest Stewardship Council.” Global Governance, vol. 14, pp. 53–71.Google Scholar

Disdier, A.-C., Fontagné, L. and Momoiuni, M. (2009). “The Impact of Regulations on Agricultural Trade: Evidence from the SPS and the TBT Agreements.” American Journal of Agricultural Economy, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 336–350.Google Scholar

Dobbert, J. P. (1969). “Le Codex Alimentarius vers une nouvelle méthode de réglamentation internationale.” 15 Annuaire Français de Droit International, pp. 677–717.Google Scholar

Du, M. (2010). “Reducing Product Standards Heterogeneity through International Standards in the WTO: How Far across the River?” Journal of World Trade, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 295–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

ECMA (2006). Minutes of the 92nd Meeting of the ECMA General Assembly. Zurich, Switzerland, December 7, 2006. Ecma/GA/2006/210.Google Scholar

Egyedi, T. M. (2012). To Select or Not? Dealing with Competing Standards in Public IT Procurement. Delft University of Technology, January 3.Google Scholar

Ehlermann, C.-D. and Ehring, L. (2005). “Decision-Making in the World Trade Organization: Is the Consensus Practice of the World Trade Organization Adequate for Making, Revising and Implementing Rules on International Trade?” Journal of Economic Law, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 51–75.Google Scholar

Enright, C. (2008). About Voting. Your Vote Counts in the ASTM International Standards Development Process, but How Is It Tallied? Standardization News, ASTM, January/February.Google Scholar

Ewers, J. (2000). “Dueling Risk Assessment: Why the WTO and Codex Threaten US Food Standards.” Environmental Law, vol. 30, pp. 387–412.Google Scholar

Farquhar, B. (2005). “Governance in the Codex Alimentarius Commission,” in Decision Making in the Global Market: Trade, Standards and the Consumer. Consumer International.Google Scholar

Farquhar, B.“Governance in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC),” in Decision Making in the Global Market: Trade, Standards and the Consumer. Consumer International.Google Scholar

Farrell, J. and Simcoe, T. (2012). “Choosing the Rules for Consensus Standardization.” RAND Journal of Economics, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 235–252.Google Scholar

Flåten, K. and Burud, E. M. (2009). The Economic Impacts of Compatibility Standards: The Case of Office Open XML. Oslo: BI Norwegian School of Management.Google Scholar

Fliess, B., et al. (2010). “The Use of International Standards in Technical Regulations.” OECD Trade Policy Papers, no. 102, pp. 235–252.Google Scholar

Fontanelli, F. (2011). “ISO and CODEX Standards and International Trade Law: What Gets Said and Is Not What’s Heard.” International and Comparative Law Quarterly, vol. 60, no. 4.Google Scholar

Ganslandt, M. and Markusen, J. R. (2001). Standards and Related Regulations in International Trade: A Modelling Approach. NBER Working Paper 8346.Google Scholar

García Martínez, M. and Poole, P. (2004). “The Development of Private Fresh Produce Safety Standards: Implications for Developing and Mediterranean Exporting Countries.” Food Policy, vol. 29, pp. 229–255.Google Scholar

Garrett, S., Jahncke, M. and Cole, E. (1998). “Effects of Codex and GATT.” Food Control, vol. 9, no. 2–3, pp. 177–182.Google Scholar

Glinski, C. (2012). “Private Norms as International Standards? Regime Collisions in Tuna Dolphin II.” European Journal of Risk Regulation, vol. 4 pp. 545–560.Google Scholar

Groetzinger, J. (1975). “The New GATT Code and the International Harmonization of Products Standards.” Cornell International Law Journal, vol. 8, pp. 168–188.Google Scholar

Grynberg, R. and Silva, S. (2006). “Harmonization without Representation: Small States, the Basel Committee, and the WTO.” World Development, vol. 34, pp. 1223–1236.Google Scholar

Guzman, A. T. (2002). “Exploring the Need for International Harmonization: Introduction – International Regulatory Harmonization.” Chicago Journal of International Law, vol. 3.Google Scholar

Guzman, A. T. and Meyer, T. (2010). “International Soft Law.” Journal of Legal Analysis, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 171–225.Google Scholar

Haas, P. M. (1992). “Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination.” International Organization, vol. 46, pp. 1–35.Google Scholar

Halpern, R. A. (1989). “The U.S.–EC Hormone Beef Controversy and the Standards Code: Implications for the Application of Health Regulations to Agricultural Trade.” North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 135–155.Google Scholar

Hammonds, H. (1990). “A U.S. Perspective on the EC Hormones Directive.” Michigan Journal of International Law, vol. 11, pp. 840–844.Google Scholar

Hang, S. W. (2004). Global Trade Patterns in Fruits and Vegetables. USDA, Agriculture Trade Report Number WRS-04–06.Google Scholar

Helfer, L. R. (2006). “Not Fully Committed? Reservations, Risk, and Treaty Design,” Yale Journal of International Law, vol. 31.Google Scholar

Herwig, A. (2001). “Legal and Institutional Aspects in the Negotiation of the Codex Alimentarius Convention.” Zeitschrift für das gesamte Lebensmittelrecht, vol. 2.Google Scholar

Howse, R. (2000). “Democracy, Science and Free Trade: Risk Regulation on Trial at the World Trade Organization.” Michigan Law Review, vol. 98, no. 7.Google Scholar

Howse, R.(2002). “From Politics to Technocracy and Back Again: The Fate of the Multilateral Trading Regime.” American Journal of International Law Symposium: The Boundaries of the WTO, vol. 94, pp. 94–117.Google Scholar

Howse, R.(2002). “The Sardines Panel and AB Rulings: Some Preliminary Reactions.” Legal Issues of Economic Integration, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 367–382.Google Scholar

Hudson, J. and Jones, P. (2003). “The Impact of Standardization on International Trade.” Homo Oeconomicus, 20, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar

International Law Commission (1966). Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of Its 18th Session. Geneva, May 4–July 19, 1966. II Yearbook of the International Law Commission, 172.Google Scholar

Jakobs, K., Procter, R. and Williams, R. (1998). “User Participation in Standards Setting: The Panacea?” Standard View, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 85–89.Google Scholar

Jakobs, K., Procter, R. and Williams, R.(2001). “The Making of Standards: Looking Inside the Work Groups.” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 102–107.Google Scholar

Joergens, C. (2004). Transnational Governance and Its Legitimacy Problematics: The Examples of Standardization and Food Safety. Presented at the Globalization and Its Discontents Colloquium (Spring 2004) at NYU Law School.Google Scholar

Jungmittag, A., Blind, K. and Grupp, H. (1999). “Innovation, Standardization and the Long-Term Production Function: A Co-integration Analysis for Germany 1960–1996.” Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften (ZWS), vol. 119, pp. 205–222.Google Scholar

Katz, M. L. and Shapiro, C. (1985). “Network Externalities, Competition and Compatibility.” American Economic Review, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 424–440.Google Scholar

Katz, M. L. and Shapiro, C.(1986). “Technology Adoption in the Presence of Network Externalities.” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 94.Google Scholar

Keohane, R.O. and Nye, J. Jr. (2001). Between Centralization and Fragmentation: The Club Model of Multilateral Cooperation and Problems of Democratic Legitimacy. KSG Working Paper No. 01–004.Google Scholar

Kimbrell, E. (2000). “What Is Codex Alimentarius?” AgBioForum, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 822–841.Google Scholar

Kingsbury, B., Krisch, N. and Stewart, R. B. (2005). “The Emergence of Global Administrative Law.” Law and Contemporary Problems, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 15–61.Google Scholar

Klabbers, J. (1996). “The Redundancy of Soft Law.” Nordic Journal of International Law, vol. 65, pp. 15–62.Google Scholar

Kobayashi, N. (2008). Harmonization of International Standards and Electric Utilities. USJP Occasional Paper 08–05, Program on U.S.–Japan Relations, Harvard University.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M. (2009). “The Politics of International Law: 20 Years Later.” European Journal of International Law, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 7–19.Google Scholar

Kurokawa, T. (2005). “Developing Human Resources for International Standards.” Quarterly Review, no. 17, pp. 34–47.Google Scholar

Lang, A. and Scott, J. (2009). “The Hidden World of WTO Governance.” European Journal of International Law, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 575–614.Google Scholar

Lapan, H. and Moschini, G. (2004). “Innovation and Trade with Endogenous Market Failure: The Case of Genetically Modified Products.” American Journal of Agricultural Economy, vol. 86, pp. 634–648.Google Scholar

Levit, J. K. (2007). “Bottom-Up International Lawmaking: Reflections on the New Haven School of International Law.” Yale Journal of International Law, vol. 32, pp. 393–420.Google Scholar

Levit, J. K.(2008). “Bottom-Up International Lawmaking: The Private Origins of Transnational Law.” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 49–73.Google Scholar

Levy, M. A., Young, O. R. and Zürn, M. (1994). The Study of International Regimes. IIASA Working Paper, WP–94–113.Google Scholar

Livemore, M. (2006). “Authority and Legitimacy in Global Governance: Deliberation, Institutional Differentiation, and the Codex Alimentarius.” New York University Law Review, vol. 81, pp. 766–801.Google Scholar

Livshiz, D. (2007). “Updating American Administrative Law: WTO, International Standards, Domestic Implementation and Public Participation.” Wisconsin International Law Journal, vol. 24, pp. 961–1016.Google Scholar

Lupien, J. R. (2000). “The Codex Alimentarius Commission: International Science-Based Standards, Guidelines and Recommendations.” AgBioForum, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 192–196.Google Scholar

Maertens, M. and Swinnen, J. F. W. (2009). “Trade, Standards and Poverty, Evidence from Senegal.” World Development, vol. 37 no. 1, pp. 161–178.Google Scholar

Marceau, G. (2013). “The New TBT Jurisprudence in US–Clove Cigarettes, WTO US Tuna II, and US–Cool.” Asian Journal of WTO and International Health Law and Policy, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–39.Google Scholar

Marceau, G. and Trachtman, J. P. (2014). “A Map of the World Trade Organization Law of Domestic Regulations of Goods: The Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement, the Sanitary and Phytosaintray Measures Agreement, and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade.” Journal of World Trade, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 351–432.Google Scholar

Márquez, P. (2007). “Standardization and Capture: The Rise of Standardization in International Industrial Regulation and Global Administrative Law.” Global Jurist, vol. 7 no. 3.Google Scholar

Maskus, K., Otsuki, T. and Wilson, J. (2005). The Cost of Compliance with Product Standards for Firms in Developing Countries: An Econometric Study. World Bank Policy Research Document, Working paper 3590, The World Bank.Google Scholar

Maskus, K. and Wilson, J. (2000). Quantifying the Impact of Technical Barriers to Trade: A Review of Past Attempts and the New Policy Context. Paper presented at the World Bank Workshop on Quantifying Trade Effects on Standards and Technical Barriers: Is It Possible?Google Scholar

Mathis, J. H. (2005). “The WTO Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT): Interaction with International Standards and Implication for Consumers.” Decision Making in the Global Market: Trade, Standards and the Consumer. Consumers International.Google Scholar

Mattli, W. (2001). “The Politics and Economics of International Institutional Standards Setting: An Introduction.” Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 328–344.Google Scholar

Mattli, W. and Büthe, T. (2003). “Setting International Standards: Technical Rationality or Primacy of Power?” World Politics, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 1–42.Google Scholar

Mattoo, A. and Sauve, P. (2003). Domestic Regulations and Service Trade Liberalization. The World Bank.Google Scholar

McCrea, D. (1997). “Codex Alimentarius: In the Consumer Interest?” Consumer Political Review, vol. 132, no. 7.Google Scholar

McDonald, J. (2005). “Domestic Regulation, International Standards, and Technical Barriers to Trade.” World Trade Review, vol. 4, pp. 249–274.Google Scholar

Meng, W. P. (1990). “The Hormone Conflict between the EEC and the United States within the Context of GATT.” Michigan Journal of International Law, vol. 11, pp. 819–839.Google Scholar

Middleton, R. W. (1973). “Standardization and International Cooperation.” Journal of World Trade Law, vol. 7, pp. 500–510.Google Scholar

Middleton, R. W.(1980). “The GATT Standards Code.” World Trade Journal, vol. 14, pp. 201–219.Google Scholar

Moenius, J. (2006). “Do National Standards Hinder or Promote Trade in Electronic Products?” IEC Centenary Challenge.Google Scholar

Moenius, J.(2006). The Good, the Bad and the Ambiguous: Standards and Trade in Agricultural Products. IATRC Summer Symposium, May 28–30, Bonn.Google Scholar

Moenius, J.(2006). Information versus Product Adaptation: The Role of Standards in Trade, International Business and Markets. Research Center Working Paper, Northwestern University, 2004.Google Scholar

Mootal, A. (2004). “The Multilateral Scientific Consensus and the World Trade Organization.” Journal of World Trade, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 855–876.Google Scholar

Morais, H. (2002). “Quest for International Standards: Global Governance vs. Sovereignty.” University of Kansas Law Review, vol. 50, pp. 779–782.Google Scholar

Morikawa, M. and Morrison, J. (2004). Who Develops ISO Standards? A Survey of Participation in ISO’s International Standards Development Process. Pacific Institute for Studies in Development, Environment, and Security, October.Google Scholar

Muñoz, R. (2005). “La Communauté entre les mains des normes internationales: les conséquences de la décision Sardines au sein de l’OMC.” Revue du Droit de l’Union Européenne, vol. 4, pp. 457–484.Google Scholar

Nanz, P. and Steffek, J. (2005). “Assessing the Democratic Quality of Deliberation in International Governance: Criteria and Research Strategies.” Acta Politica, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 368–383.Google Scholar

Nusbaumer, J. (1984). “The GATT Standards Code in Operation.” Journal of World Trade Law, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 542–552.Google Scholar

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (1999). An Assessment of the Costs for International Trade in Meeting Regulatory Requirements, TD/TC/WP(99)8/FINAL. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar

Overman, J. R. (1991). GATT Standards Code Activities of the National Institute of Standards and Technology 1991. US Department of Commerce, Technical Administration, National Institute of Standards and Technology, April.Google Scholar

Partiti, E. (2013). “The Appellate Body Report in the US–Tuna II and Its Impact on Eco-Labeling and Standardization.” Legal Issues of Economic Integration, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 73–94.Google Scholar

Pattberg, P. (2005). “The Forest Stewardship Council: Risk and Potential of Private Forest Governance.” Journal of Environment and Development, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 356–374.Google Scholar

Pascal, L. (2009). Private Standards in International Trade: Issues and Opportunities. Paper presented at the WTO’s Workshop on Environment-Related Private Standards, Certification and Labeling Requirements, Geneva, July 9.Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, J. (2001). “The Role of Public International Law in the WTO. How Far Can We Go?” American Journal of International Law, vol. 95, pp. 535–578.Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, J.(2011). Informal International Lawmaking: Mapping the Action and Testing Concepts of Accountability and Effectiveness. CTEI Working Paper, CTEI–2011–05.Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, J., Wessel, R. A. and Wouters, J. (2011). The Exercise of Public Authority through Informal International Lawmaking: An Accountability Issue? Global Governance as Public Authority: Structures, Contestation, and Normative Change, Jean Monnet Working Paper 06/11.Google Scholar

Pereira, R. A. (2008). “Why Would International Administrative Activity Be Any Less Legitimate? A Study of the Codex Alimentarius Commission.” German Law Journal, vol. 9, pp. 541–571.Google Scholar

Picciotto, S. (2003). “Private Rights vs. Public Standards in the WTO.” Review of International Political Economy, vol. 10, pp. 377–405.Google Scholar

Picciotto, S.(2003). “Rights, Responsibilities and Regulation of International Business.” Columbia Journal of Transatlantic Law, vol. 42.Google Scholar

Pinder, J. (1968). “Positive Integration and Negative Integration: Some Problems of Economic Union in the EEC.” The World Today, vol. 24, pp. 88–110.Google Scholar

Ping, W. (2011). A Brief History of Standards and Standardization Organizations: A Chinese Perspective. East-West Center Working Papers, no. 117, April.Google Scholar

Pistor, K. (2002). “The Standardization of Law and Its Effects in Developing Economies.” American Journal of Comparative Law, vol. 50, pp. 97–130.Google Scholar

Poli, S. (2004). “The European Community and the Adoption of International Food Standards within the Codex Alimentarius Commission.” European Law Journal, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 613–630.Google Scholar

Portugal Pérez, A., Reyes, J. D. and Wilson, J. (2010). “Beyond the Information Technology Agreement: Harmonization of Standards and Trade in Electronics.” The World Economy, vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 879–897.Google Scholar

Post, D. L. (2005). “Standards and Regulatory Capitalism: The Diffusion of Food Safety Standards in Developing Countries.” Annals of the Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 598, pp. 168–183.Google Scholar

Quick, R. and Bluther, A. (1999). “Has the Appellate Body Erred? An Appraisal and Criticism of the Ruling in the WTO Hormones Case.” Journal of International Economic Law, vol. 2 no. 4, pp. 603–639.Google Scholar

Raballand, G. and Aldaz-Carroll, E. (2005). How Do Differing Standards Increase Trade Costs? The Case of Pallets, Policy Research Working Papers, The World Bank.Google Scholar

Randell, A. (1995). Codex Alimentarius: How It All Began. Food and Agriculture Organization.Google Scholar

Raustiala, K. (2003). “The Architecture of International Cooperation: Transgovernmental Networks and the Future of International Law.” Virginia Journal of International Law, vol. 43.Google Scholar

Regan, D. H. (2005). The Limited (and Sometimes Perverse) Contribution of the WTO to Global Administrative Law. Draft paper given at NYU Law School Global Administrative Law Conference.Google Scholar

Reich, A. (2004). “The WTO as Law-Harmonizing Institutions.” University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law, vol. 25, pp. 321–382.Google Scholar

Reyes, J. D. (2011). International Harmonization of Product Standards and Firm Heterogeneity International Trade. Policy Research Working Paper 5677, The World Bank.Google Scholar

Roberts, D. (1998). “Preliminary Assessment of the Effects of the WTO Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Trade Regulations.” Journal of International Economic Law, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 377–405.Google Scholar

Romi, R. (2001). “Codex Alimentarius: de l’ambivalence à l’ambiguïté.” Revue Juridique de l’Environnement, no. 2, pp. 201–213.Google Scholar

Rosman, L. (1993). “Public Participation in International Pesticide Regulation: When the Codex Commission Decides, Who Will Listen?” Virginia Environmental Law Journal, vol. 12, pp. 329–365.Google Scholar

Roth-Arriaza, N. (1995). “Shifting the Point of Regulation: The International Organization for Standardization and Global Law Making on Trade and the Environment.” Ecology Law Quarterly, vol. 22, pp. 480–539.Google Scholar

Schepers, D. H. (2010). “Challenges to Legitimacy at the Forest Stewardship Council.” Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 279–290.Google Scholar

Schubber, S. (1972). “The Codex Alimentarius Commission under International Law.” International and Comparative Law Quarterly, vol. 21.Google Scholar

Scott, J. (2004). “International Trade and Environmental Governance: Relating Rules (and Standards) in the EU and in the WTO.” European Journal of International Law, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 631–655.Google Scholar

Scott, C., Cafaggi, F. and Senden, L. (2011). “The Concept and Constitutional Challenge of Transnational Private Regulation.” Journal of Law and Society, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 1–19.Google Scholar

Seck, M. D. and Evans, D. D. (2004). Major U.S. Cities Using National Standard Fire Hydrants, One Century after the Great Baltimore Fire. US Department of Commerce Technology Administration, National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST 7158.Google Scholar

Shaffer, G. (2002). “Reconciling Trade and Regulatory Goals: The Prospects and Limits of New Approaches to Transatlantic Governance through Mutual Recognition and Safe Harbor Agreements.” Columbia Journal of European Law, vol. 29, no. 30, pp. 29–77.Google Scholar

Shaha, R. and Kesan, J. P. (2012). “Lost in Translation: Interoperability Issues for Open Standards.” Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 119–147.Google Scholar

Sidney, A. (2002). “International Trade Agreements, Regulatory Protection and Public Accountability.” Administrative Law Review, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 435–458.Google Scholar

Sikes, L. (1998). “FDA’s Consideration of Codex Alimentarius Standards in Light of International Trade Agreements.” Food and Drug Law Journal, vol. 53, pp. 327–335.Google Scholar

Simcoe, T. (2003). “Global Government Networks: Global Information Agencies and Disaggregated Democracy.” Michigan Journal of International Law, vol. 24, pp. 1044–1075.Google Scholar

Simcoe, T.(2012). “Standard Setting Committees: Consensus Governance for Shared Technology Platforms.” American Economic Review, vol. 102, no. 1, pp. 305–336.Google Scholar

Smith, B. C. (1999). “The Politics of Global Consensus Building: A Comparative Analysis.” Global Governance, vol. 5, pp. 173–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Staiger, R. and Sykes, A. (2011). “International Trade, National Treatment and Domestic Regulation.” Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 149–203.Google Scholar

Stewart, R., Sanchez, B. and Michelle, R. (2011). “The World Trade Organization: Multiple Dimensions of Global Administrative Law.” International Journal of Constitutional Law, vol. 9, nos. 3 and 4, pp. 556–586.Google Scholar

Stewart, T. P. and Johansson, D. S. (1998). “The SPS Agreement of the World Trade Organization and International Organizations: The Roles of the Codex Alimentarius Commission, the International Plant Protection Convention, and the International Office of Epizootics.” Syracuse Journal of International Law, 26.Google Scholar

Stiglitz, J. (1995). The Theory of International Public Goods and the Architecture of International Organizations. High Level Group on Development Strategy and Management on the Market Economy. Third meeting, Background Paper no. 7, July 8–10.Google Scholar

Strawbridge, J. (2013). “U.S. Implementation of Adverse WTO Rulings: A Closer Look at the Tuna-Dolphin, COOL, and Clove Cigarettes Cases.” American Society of International Law, vol. 17, no. 23.Google Scholar

Suppan, S. (2005). Governance in the Codex Alimentarius Commission. Consumers International.Google Scholar

Swann, G. M. P. (2005). Do Standards Enable or Constrain Innovation? The Empirical Economics of Standards, DTI Economic Papers, no. 12.Google Scholar

Swann, G. M. P.(2010). “International Standards and Trade: A Review of the Empirical Literature.” OECD Trade Policy Working Papers, No. 97, OECD Publishing.Google Scholar

Swann, G. M. P., Temple, P. and Shurmer, M. (1996). “Standards and Trade Performance: The British Experience.” Economic Journal, vol. 106, pp. 1297–1313.Google Scholar

Swinnen, J. and Vandemoortele, T. (2012). “Trade and the Political Economy of Standards.” World Trade Review, vol. 11, pp. 390–400.Google Scholar

Sykes, A. O. (1999). “The (Limited) Role of Regulatory Harmonization in International Goods and Services Markets.” Journal of International Economy Law, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 49–70.Google Scholar

Tassey, G. (2000). “Standardization in Technology-Based Markets.” Elsevier, vol. 29, nos. 4 and 5, pp. 587–602.Google Scholar

Temple, P. (2005). An Overview of the Projects. The Empirical Economics of Standards, DTI Economic Papers No. 12.Google Scholar

Temple, P., Spencer, C. and Witt, R. (2005). Standards and the Long Run Growth in the UK. The Empirical Economics of Standards, DTI Economic Papers No. 12.Google Scholar

Teubner, G. (1983). “Substantive and Reflexive Elements Modern Law.” Law and Society, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 239–286.Google Scholar

Unnevehr, L. J. (2000). “Food Safety Issues and Fresh Food Products from LDC.” Agricultural Economics, vol. 23, pp. 231–240.Google Scholar

Van Aaken, A. (2009). “Effectuating Public International Law through Market Mechanism?” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 33–57.Google Scholar

Van de Beek, R. and Ranjan, P. (2003). Dealing with Protectionist Standard Setting: Effectiveness of WTO Agreement on SPS and TBT. CUTS Centre for International Trade, Economics and Environment.Google Scholar

Vapnek, J. and Spreij, M. (2005). Perspectives and Guidelines on Food Legislation: With a New Model Food Law. FAO Legislative Studies 87, Food and Agriculture Organization.Google Scholar

Vaux, C. (1998). Trade-Related Harmonization Issues and the Multilateral Trading System. UNECE, Standards and Regulations in International Trade. Summary of Proceedings. Round Table on the Impact of Standards on Trade, Geneva, June 15.Google Scholar

Veggland, F. and Borgen, S. O. (2002). Changing the Codex: The Role of International Institutions. Norwegian Agricultural Economics Research Institute, Working Paper 16.Google Scholar

Veggland, F. and Borgen, S. O.(2005). “Negotiating International Food Standards: The World Trade Organization’s Impact on the Codex Alimentarius Commission.” Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 675–708.Google Scholar

Veggeland, F. and Elvestad, C. (2004). Equivalence and Mutual Recognition in Trade Arrangements: Relevance for the WTO and the Codex Alimentarius Commission. Norwegian Agricultural Economic Research Institute.Google Scholar

Vesterdorf, B. (1999). “Transparency Not Just a Vogue Word.” Fordham International Law, vol. 22, pp. 902–929.Google Scholar

Victor, D. G. (2000). “The Sanitary and Phytosanitary Agreement of the World Trade Organization: An Assessment after Five Years.” NYU Journal of International Law and Politics, vol. 32, pp. 865–938.Google Scholar

Vogel, D. (1997). Barriers or Benefits? Regulation in Transatlantic Trade. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar

Vogel, D.(2008). “Private Global Business Regulations.” Annual Review of Political Science, vol. 11, pp. 261–282.Google Scholar

Voigt, C. (2008). “The Role of General Principles in International Law and Their Relationship to Treaty Law.” Retfærd Årgang, vol. 31, NR. 2/121, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar

Von Bernstorff, J. (2008). “Procedures of Decision-Making and the Role of Law in International Organizations.” German Law Journal, vol. 9, pp. 1939–1964.Google Scholar

Von Bogdandy, A., Dann, P. and Goldmann, M. (2008). “Developing Publicness of Public International Law: Towards a Legal Framework for Global Governance Activities.” German Law Journal, vol. 9, pp. 3–32.Google Scholar

Wallach, L. M. (2002). “Accountable Governance in the Era of Globalization: The WTO, NAFTA, and International Harmonization of Standards.” University of Kansas Law Review, vol. 50, pp. 777–806.Google Scholar

Wane, D. Y. (2008). De l’influence des nouveaux modes de régulation juridique sur le droit objectif: le codex alimentarius, artisan d’un nouvel ordre alimentaire international. Université de Genève.Google Scholar

Weil, P. (1987). “Towards Relative Normativity in International Law.” American Journal of International Law, vol. 77, pp. 413–442.Google Scholar

Werle, R. (2001). “Institutional Aspects of Standardization: Jurisdictional Conflicts and the Choice of Standardization Organization.” Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 392–410.Google Scholar

Wijkström, E. and McDaniels, D. (2013). “Improving Regulatory Governance: International Standards and the WTO TBT Agreement.” Journal of World Trade, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 1013–1046.Google Scholar

Wilson, J. S. (2001). Bridging the Standards Divide: Recommendations for Reform from a Development Perspective. World Bank Background Paper, The World Bank.Google Scholar

Wilson, J. S.(2003). Standards and Global Trade: A Voice for Africa. The World Bank.Google Scholar

Wilson, J. S.(2007). Standards, Trade and Development: A Quick Look at Regulations and Information Technology. Yale University Law School, Open International Standards Symposium, New Haven, February.Google Scholar

Wilson, J. S. and Otsuki, T. (2004). Standard and Technical Regulations and Firms in Developing Countries: New Evidence from a World Bank Technical Barriers to Trade Survey. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar

Winickoff, D. and Bushey, D. (2010). “Science and Power in Global Food Regulation: The Rise of the Codex Alimentarius.” Science, Technology, & Human Values, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 356–381.Google Scholar

Winkler, S. (2012). “Taiwan’s UN Dilemma: To Be or Not To Be.” Taiwan–U.S. Quarterly Analysis, no. 9.Google Scholar

Witte, J. M. (2003). “A Single European Voice” in International Standardization? American Perceptions, European Realities. AICGS/CDAAD Working Paper Series.Google Scholar

Wolfe, R. (2005). “Decision-Making and Transportation in the Medieval WTO: Does the Sutherland Report Have the Right Prescription?” Journal of International Economic Law, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 631–645.Google Scholar

World Bank (1997). Standards and Conformity Assessment of Non-Tariff Barriers to Trade. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, The World Bank.Google Scholar

Wouters, J., De Meester, B. and Ryngaert, C. (2003). “Democracy and International Law.” Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, vol. 24, pp. 139–197.Google Scholar

Wtostowski, T. (2010). “Selected Observations on Regulation of Private Standards by the WTO.” XXX Polish Yearbook of International Law.Google Scholar

Yates, J. and Murphy, C. (2007). Coordinating International Standards: The Formation of the ISO. MIT Sloan Working Paper 46 T-07, January 2007.Google Scholar

Zaring, D. (2005). “Informal Procedure, Hard and Soft in International Administration.” Chicago Journal of International Law, vol. 5, pp. 547–603.Google Scholar

Zúñiga Schroder, H. (2009). “Definition of the Concept ‘International Standard’ in the TBT Agreement.” Journal of World Trade, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 1233–1254.Google Scholar

Zürn, M. (2004). “Global Governance and Legitimacy Problems.” Government and Opposition, vol. 39, pp. 260–287.Google Scholar

ANSI (2003). ISO Horizon 2010. Consultations to Update ISO Strategies 2005–2010, October.Google Scholar

ASME (2011). Standards and Technical Barriers to Trade. General Position Paper, PS11–03.Google Scholar

BBC (2000). “Netscape: A History.” BBC News, February 10.Google Scholar

BKP, Development, Research and Consulting (2015). Mid-Term Evaluation of SIDA Contribution to ISO Action Plan for Developing Countries 2011–2015. Final Report, March.Google Scholar

Bray, T. (u. d.). On OOXML. tbray.org.Google Scholar

Brown, A. (2010). Microsoft Fails the Standards Test. www.adjb.net/, March 31.Google Scholar

Bushell-Embling, D. (2008). “Bias Claim on Big Office Vote,” The Age, February 26.Google Scholar

Chernoff, M. (2008). “ISO Approval: A Good Process Gone Bad,” Red Hat Magazine, March 24.Google Scholar

Christofides, A. (2011). Some Clarifications on the OOXML Ballot Resolution Meeting. ΕΜΠ – Τυποποίηση Τεχνολογίας Πληροφορικής, July 11.Google Scholar

CONEVAL (2015). Medición de la Pobreza en México y las Entidades Federativas 2014, July.Google Scholar

Delaney, H. (2010). Choosing Standards Based on Merit: Liberalizing Regulation, Trade and Development. ASTM.Google Scholar

Doussin, J. P. (1998). Les eaux minérales dans le Codex Alimentarius, un choc de cultures. Annales de Mines: Réalites industrielles, May.Google Scholar

Ecologia (2003). Increasing the Effectiveness of NGOs’ Participation in ISO TC 2003.Google Scholar

The Economist (1945). “UNSCC,” The Economist, March 3.Google Scholar

European Communities (2001). Trade Description of Sardines. First Written Submission of the European Communities, WT/DS231, Geneva, November 12.Google Scholar

European Communities (2002). Trade Description of Sardines. Second Written Submission of the European Communities, WT/DS231, Geneva, January 11.Google Scholar

European Communities (2002). Trade Description of Sardines. Appellant’s Submission of the European Communities Pursuant to Rule 21 of the Working Procedures for Appellate Review, AB.-2002–3, Geneva, July 8.Google Scholar

FAO (u.d.). Principles Concerning the Participation of International Non-Governmental Organizations in the Work of the Codex Alimentarius Commission, Rome.Google Scholar

FAO (u.d.). (2007). Private Standards in the United States and European Union Markets for Fruit and Vegetables, Rome.Google Scholar

FAO/WHO (u.d.). FACT Sheet: What Is JECFA?Google Scholar

FAO/WHO (1955). Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Nutrition. Report of the First Session. Technical Report Series, No. 16, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar

FAO/WHO (2003). FAO/WHO Cooperative Programme, Multi-Donor Project, Project Document, FAO/WHO Project and Fund for Enhanced Participation in Codex, June 17.Google Scholar

FAO/WHO (2014). FAO/WHO Project and Fund for Participation in Codex Grouping of Eligible Countries – 2014 Support.Google Scholar

Fiveash, K. (2008). “OOXML Approved as International Standard?” The Channel, March 31.Google Scholar

Formosa Foundation (n.d.). Background Briefing Taiwan’s Participation in International Organizations.Google Scholar

Forss, K., Andersson, J. and Kasirye-Alemu, E. (2011). Evaluation of the ISO Action Plan for Developing Countries, 2005–2010, Final Report, November.Google Scholar

FSFE (u.d.). Six Questions to National Standards Bodies. www.fsfeurope.org.Google Scholar

FSFE (2007). FSFE Formal Objection to the Recent UK14 Meeting, August 13.Google Scholar

Gedda, R. (2008). “Microsoft Developer Joins Aussie OOXML Standards Delegation,” Computerworld, February 20.Google Scholar

Geoghegan, T. (2009). “Could the UK Drive on the Right?” BBC News Magazine, September 7.Google Scholar

Goldberg, D. (2007). “Microsoft Pressed Partners in Sweden to Vote for OOXML,” Washington Post, August 30.Google Scholar

ISO (2008). “Ballot Resolution Meeting Addresses Comments of Draft ISO/IEC29500 Standard,” ISO News, March 5.Google Scholar

ISO (2008). “ISO/IEC DIS 29500 Receives Necessary Votes for Approval as an International Standard,” ISO News, April 2.Google Scholar

ISO (2008). “ISO and IEC Members Give Go Ahead on ISO/IEC DIS 29500,” ISO News, August 15.Google Scholar

Kosek, J. (2008). “From the Office Document Format Battlefield,” IT PRO, May–June.Google Scholar

Kuert, W. (1997). The Founding of ISO. ISO, Friendship among Equals: Recollections from ISO’s First 50 Years.Google Scholar

Lowel, S. C. (1999). The Yin and Yang of Standards Development. World Standard Day Paper Competition, First Place Winner.Google Scholar

Malanitchev, S. (2009). Commercial Quality Standards Produced by the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. Available with the author.Google Scholar

Montalbano, E. (2008). “ISO, IEC Reject Appeals, Approve OOXML Spec,” InfoWorld, August 15.Google Scholar

Paul, R. (2008). “ISO Leadership Encourages Rejection of OOXML Appeal,” Ars Technica, July 10.Google Scholar

Paul, R.(2008). “Norwegian Standards Body Implodes over OOXML Controversy,” Ars Technica, October 3.Google Scholar

Robie, J. (2008). “OOXML Approved by ISO: What Next?” Red Hat Magazine, April 10.Google Scholar

Ruppert, L. (1956). Brief History of the International Electrotechnical Commission. International Electrotechnical Commission.Google Scholar

SABS (2008). Appeal from the South African National Body Regarding the Outcome of the Fast Track Processing of DIS2 9500 Office Open XML, May 22.Google Scholar

Sayer, P. (2008). “Debate on OOXML Standard Continues behind Closed Doors,” Info World, February 27.Google Scholar

Sayer, P.(2008). “Changes to OOXML Draft Standard Waved Through,” Info World, February 29.Google Scholar

Sayer, P.(2008). “India and Brazil File Appeals against OOXML Standardization,” IDG News Service, May 3.Google Scholar

Schofield, J. (2003). “Why Was VHS Better Than Betamax?” The Guardian, January 25.Google Scholar

SIUG (2007). Letter to the SNV, August 14.Google Scholar

Swedish Standard Institute (2007). Office Open XML-SIS oglitigförklarar omröstingen, August 30.Google Scholar

Thomas, J. (1997). What Is an International Standard? ASTM.Google Scholar

Thomas, J.(2011). “A Real Barrier to Trade: Who Develops International Standards?” Plain Talk, ASTM Standardization News.Google Scholar

Thomas, J.(2011). “Coherence. Avoiding Redundancy and Duplication of Effort in Standards Development,” Plain Talk, ASTM Standardization News.Google Scholar

United Nations (1946). General Assembly, Resolution 46, Economic Reconstruction of Devastated Areas, Fifty-Fifth Plenary Meeting, December 11.Google Scholar

United Nations (1974). United Nations Judicial Yearbook.Google Scholar

UNCTAD (2013). Non-Tariff Measures to Trade: Economic and Policy Issues for Developing Countries, UNCTAD/DITC/TAB/2012/1.Google Scholar

UNCTAD (2014). Introduction to Non-Tariff Measures. Online Course on Non-Tariff Measures. Document available with the author.Google Scholar

Updegrove, A. (2007). “The Contradictory Nature of OOXML (Part II) – 19 Nations [Make That 20] Respond,” The Standards Blog, February 6.Google Scholar

US Department of Commerce (2009). Standards and Competitiveness: Coordinating for Results, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

US Trade Representative (2013). Report on Technical Barriers to Trade, Washington, DC: US Trade Representative.Google Scholar

Weir, R. (2010). ISO/IEC JTC1 Revises Directives, Addresses OOXML Abuse. www.robweir.com, July 7.Google Scholar

Williams, M. (u.d.). “Sony to End Floppy Disk Production,” PC World.Google Scholar

FAO (2013). Basic Texts of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Constitution, 2013 Edition.Google Scholar

Diario Oficial de la Federación (2012). Ley Federal sobre Metrología y Normalización. General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (1947).Google Scholar

GATT (1980). Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade.Google Scholar

ISO, IEC, ITU and UNECE (u.d.). Memorandum of Understanding between the International Electrotechnical Commission, the International Organization for Standardization, the International Telecommunication Union and the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Concerning Standardization in the Field of Electronic Business.Google Scholar

United Nations (1945). Charter of the United Nations, October 24.Google Scholar

United Nations (1946). Statute of the International Court of Justice, April 18.Google Scholar

United Nations (1969). Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, May 23.Google Scholar

US Government Publishing Office (2015). Electronic Code of Federal Regulations, October 29.Google Scholar

WHO (1946). Constitution of the World Health Organization, 2006 Edition.Google Scholar

WTO (1994). Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures.Google Scholar

WTO (1994). Agreement on Technical Barrie to Trade.Google Scholar

WTO (1994). Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization.Google Scholar

(u.d.). ASTM International’s Compliance with the Principles for the Development of International Standards.Google Scholar

(u.d.). Technical Committee Officer Handbook, Eighth Edition.Google Scholar

(1902). ASTM Charter.Google Scholar

(2005). ASTM C1363–05, Standard Test Method for Thermal Performance of Building Materials and Envelope Assemblies by Means of a Hot Box Apparatus.Google Scholar

(2006). Brazil–US Standards Dialogue.Google Scholar

(2009). ASTM Bylaws.Google Scholar

(2010). COTCO Bylaws.Google Scholar

(2011). Effectiveness of Federal Agency Participation in Standardization Activities in Selected Technical Sectors for National Science and Technology Council Subcommittee on Standardization. Comments from ASTM, FR. Doc 201030864, February 28.Google Scholar

(2013). Committee of Standards Bylaws.Google Scholar

(2013). Partnering with People. ASTM International Memorandum of Understanding Program, September.Google Scholar

(2013). Regulations Governing ASTM Technical Committees.Google Scholar

(2014). Annual Business Meeting.Google Scholar

(2014). ASTM International Board of Directors.Google Scholar

(2014). Helping Our World Work Better, September.Google Scholar

(2017). 2017 Annual Report.Google Scholar

(2002). FSC Social Strategy: Building and Implementing a Social Agenda, Version 2.1.Google Scholar

(2004). Policy for Pilot Tests of Draft FSC Standards, FSC-POL-01–001 (2004) EN, April.Google Scholar

(2011). FSC Standard for Chain of Custody Certification FSC-STD-40–004 V2-1 EN.Google Scholar

(2013). The Development and Revision of FSC Normative Documents. FSC-PRO-01–001 (V3-0) EN.Google Scholar

(2013). The Development Procedure, P045 – Version 1.Google Scholar

(2013). Revision of FSC Normative Documents, FSC-PRO-01–001 (V3-0 – January, 2010), EN, March.Google Scholar

(2013). Statutes.Google Scholar

(2015). Facts and Figures, September.Google Scholar

(1968). Committee on Trade on Industrial Products, Report on First Meeting of the Committee, November 12–29, L/3083.Google Scholar

(1969). Committee on Trade on Industrial Products, Report to Council, November 22, L/3298.Google Scholar

(1970). Committee on Trade on Industrial Products, Summary of Proposals in Reports of the Five Working Groups of Non-Tariff Barriers, October 27, COM.IND/W/36.Google Scholar

(1970). Committee on Trade on Industrial Products, Report of Working Group 3 on Non-Tariff Barriers, November 26, COM.IND/W/41.Google Scholar

(1971). Committee on Trade on Industrial Products, Report to Council, February 10, L/3496.Google Scholar

(1971). Committee on Trade on Industrial Products. Note by the Secretariat on Meeting of July 9, 1971, August 9, COM.IND/17.Google Scholar

(1972). Committee on Trade on Industrial Products, Meeting of March 1972, March 30, COM.IND/19.Google Scholar

(1972). Committee on Trade on Industrial Products, Meeting of June 1972, June 27, COM.IND/W/83.Google Scholar

(1972). Committee on Trade on Industrial Products. Note by the Secretariat, August 3, COM.IND/W/87.Google Scholar

(1973). Committee on Trade on Industrial Products, Meeting of January 1973, January 30, COM.IND/W/96.Google Scholar

(1973). Committee on Trade on Industrial Products. Note by the Secretariat, June 14, COM.IND/W/106.Google Scholar

(1973). Committee on Trade on Industrial Products, Group 3 on Standards, June 25, COM.IND/W/108.Google Scholar

(1973). Committee on Trade on Industrial Products, Meeting of July 1973. Note by the Secretariat, August 10, COM.IND/W/112.Google Scholar

(1974). Group 3 (e) work on task 15, Draft Code on Standards. Note by the Secretariat, March 29, MTN/3e/W/11.Google Scholar

(1974). Group 3 (e) work on task 15, Some Aspects of the Applicability of the Draft Code on Standards to Agriculture. Note by the Secretariat, October 8, MTN/3e/W/26.Google Scholar

(1975). Multilateral Trade Negotiations. Subgroup “Technical Barriers to Trade,” Standards, Packaging and Labeling, Marks of Origin, Background. Note by the Secretariat, April 21, MTN/NTM/W/5.Google Scholar

(1975). Multilateral Trade Negotiations. Group “Non-Tariff Measures,” Subgroup “Technical Barriers to Trade,” Definitions, Working Paper by the Secretariat, June 26, MTN/NTM/W/14.Google Scholar

(1975). Multilateral Trade Negotiations. Group “Non-Tariff Measures,” Subgroup “Technical Barriers to Trade,” Issues Raised and Suggestions Made at May Meeting of Subgroup, July 10, MTN/NTM/W/12.Google Scholar

(1975). Multilateral Trade Negotiations. Group “Non-Tariff Measures,” The Applicability of the ECE/ISO. Definitions for the Proposed Standards Code. Note by the Secretariat, September 17, MTN/NTM/W/18.Google Scholar

(1975). Multilateral Trade Negotiations. Group “Non-Tariff Measures.” Subgroup “Technical Barriers to Trade,” Proposal by Nordic Delegation, September 24, MTN/NTM/W/19.Google Scholar

(1976). Multilateral Trade Negotiations. Group “Non-Tariff Measures.” Subgroup “Technical Barriers to Trade,” Definitions. Note by the Secretariat, January 27, MTN/NTM/W/35.Google Scholar

(1976), Multilateral Trade Negotiations. Group “Non-Tariff Measures.” Subgroup “Technical Barriers to Trade,” Definitions. Note by Mr. K. Bergholm (Finland), February 25, MTN/NTM/W/86.Google Scholar

(1976). Multilateral Trade Negotiations. Group “Non-Tariff Measures.” Subgroup “Technical Barriers to Trade,” Points before the Subgroup. Notes by the Secretariat, June 16, MTN/NTM/W/50.Google Scholar

(1977). Multilateral Trade Negotiations. Group “Non-Tariff Measures.” Subgroup “Technical Barriers to Trade,” Definitions, February 25, 1977, MTN/NTM/W/86.Google Scholar

(1977). Multilateral Trade Negotiations. Group “Non-Tariff Measures.” Subgroup “Technical Barriers to Trade,” Insertions in the Text of the Draft Standards Code, March 29, MTN/NTM/W/93.Google Scholar

(1977). Multilateral Trade Negotiations. Group “Non-Tariff Measures.” Subgroup “Technical Barriers to Trade,” Synoptic Table of Proposals on Sections 19 and 21 of Draft Standards Code. Note by the Secretariat, December 19, MTN/NTM/W/130.Google Scholar

(1978). Multilateral Trade Negotiations. Group “Non-Tariff Measures.” Subgroup “Technical Barriers to Trade,” Summary of Activities of International Organizations to Assist Developing Countries in the Standards Area. Note by the Secretariat, July 19, MTN/NTM/W/177.Google Scholar

(1978). Multilateral Trade Negotiations. Group “Non-Tariff Measures.” Subgroup “Technical Barriers to Trade,” Proposal of the European Communities for the Draft Code for Preventing Technical Barriers to Trade, January 13, MTN/NTM/W/135.Google Scholar

(1980). Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade, List of International Standardizing Bodies for Purposes of Articles 10.4 and 13.3 of the Agreement. Note by the Secretariat, June 5, Doc. TBT/W/8.Google Scholar

(1980). Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade, List of International Standardizing Bodies. Note by the Secretariat. Addendum, November 3, TBT/W/8 Add.1.Google Scholar

(1982). Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade, Information on Existing International Standards. Note by the Secretariat, February 15, TBT/W/45.Google Scholar

(1987). Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade, Communication from the Nordic Delegations. Updating the Definitions for Terms Used in the TBT Agreement, September 4, TBT/W/103.Google Scholar

(1987). Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade, Minutes of the Meeting Held on March 10, 1988, July 6, TMB/M/27.Google Scholar

(1987). Uruguay Round, Group of Negotiations on Goods, Negotiating Group on MTN Agreements and Arrangements, Subjects Related to the Uruguay Round in the Area of Technical Barriers to Trade, October 2, MTN.GNG/NG8/W/13.Google Scholar

(1988). Uruguay Round, Group of Negotiations on Goods, Negotiating Group on Agriculture, A Discussion Paper on Issues Related to the Negotiations Submitted by the United States, February 22, Doc. MTN.GNG/NG5/W/44.Google Scholar

(1989). Uruguay Round, Group of Negotiations on Goods, Negotiating Group on Agriculture, Negotiating Group on Agriculture (September 25–26), Sanitary and Phytosanitary Issues, Communication from the Cairns Group, October 2, Doc. MTN.GNG/NG5/W/112.Google Scholar

(1989). Uruguay Round. Group of Negotiations on Goods, Submission of the European Communities on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Regulations and Measures, December 20, Doc. MTN.GNG/NG5/W/146.Google Scholar

(1990). Uruguay Round. Group of Negotiations on Goods, Negotiating Group on Agriculture, Working Group on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Regulations and Barriers. Draft Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures. Note by the Nordic Countries, May 28, Doc. MTN.GNG/NG5/WGSP/W/21.Google Scholar

(1990). Multilateral Trade Negotiations. The Uruguay Round. Group of Negotiations on Goods (GATT). Negotiating Group on MTN Agreements and Arrangements, Meeting of October 29–30, November 1, MTN.GNG/NG8/22.Google Scholar

(1995). Committee on Trade and Environment. Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade, Negotiating History of the Coverage of the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade with Regard to Labeling Requirements, Voluntary Standards, and Processes and Production Methods Unrelated to Products Characteristics. Note by the Secretariat, August 29, WT/CTE/W/10 and G/TBT/W/11.Google Scholar

(u.d.). IEC Affiliate Country Programme.Google Scholar

(1981). 1981: A Year of Anniversaries.Google Scholar

(2001). IEC Statutes and Rules of Procedure, 2001 Edition.Google Scholar

(2007). IEC Global Relevance Toolbox, Administrative Circular AC/22/2007 2007–06–29.Google Scholar

(2011). Master Plan.Google Scholar

(2015). ISO/IEC Directives, IEC Supplement.Google Scholar

(u.d.). Guidance to ISO National Standards Bodies Engaging Stakeholders and Building Consensus.Google Scholar

(u.d.). ISO Policy on Global Relevance.Google Scholar

(u.d.). ISO/TMB Policy and Principles Statement Global Relevance of ISO Technical Work and Publications.Google Scholar

(1994). ISO 8990:1994, Thermal Insulation – Determination of Steady-State Thermal Transmission Properties – Calibrated and Guarded Hot Box.Google Scholar

(2007). ISO 216. Writing Paper and Certain Classes of Printed Matter – Trimmed Sizes – A and B Series, and Indication of Machine Direction, Second Edition.Google Scholar

(2010). Action Plan for Developing Countries 2010–2015.Google Scholar

(2010). Strategic Plan 2010–2015.Google Scholar

(2013). ISO Statutes, Seventeenth Edition.Google Scholar

(2013). ISO Membership Manual.Google Scholar

(2013). Guidance on Twinning in ISO Standards Development Activities. Increasing the Participation of Developing Country Members, April.Google Scholar

(2013). Historical Record of ISO Membership since Its Creation (1947).Google Scholar

(2013). COPOLCO, Consumer Participation Working Group Report, Agenda Item 1114/2013 March.Google Scholar

(2013). ISO in Figures for the Year 2013.Google Scholar

(2014). ISO in Figures for the Year 2014.Google Scholar

(2014). Consolidated ISO Supplement: Procedures Specific to ISO.Google Scholar

(2014). 37th General Assembly, Working Documents, September 10–12. Document available with the author.Google Scholar

(2016). Action Plan for Developing Countries, 2016–2020.Google Scholar

(2016). ISO in Figures for the Year 2016.Google Scholar

(2001). ISO/IEC Statement on Consumer Participation in Standardization Work.Google Scholar

(2004). ISO/IEC Guide 2: 2004, Standardization and Related Activities – General Vocabulary.Google Scholar

(2014). ISO/IEC Directives, Fifth Edition.Google Scholar

(2015). JTC1 Supplement.Google Scholar

(1965). Report of the Third Session of the Codex Alimentarius Commission, Alinorm 68/30, Rome, October 19–28.Google Scholar

(1969). Report of the Sixth Session of the Joint FAO/WHO Codex Alimentarius Commission, Alinorm, 69/67, Geneva, March 4–14.Google Scholar

(1970). Report of the Seventh Session of the Codex Alimentarius Commission, Alinorm, 70/43, Rome, April 7–17.Google Scholar

(1971). Report of the Sixth Session Codex Committee on Fish and Fishery Products, Bergen, Norway, October 4–8.Google Scholar

(1972). Report of the Fourth Session of the Codex Committee on Natural Mineral Waters, Alinorm 72/19 B, Vienna, June 12–13.Google Scholar

(1974). Tenth Session, Rome, July, Report of the Codex Committee on Fish and Fishery Products, Seventh Session, October 2–7, 1972, Bergen, Norway.Google Scholar

(1974). Report of the Tenth Codex Alimentarius Commission, Alinorm 74/44, Rome, July 1–11.Google Scholar

(1974). Report of the Codex Committee on Fish and Fishery Products, Eighth Session, October 1–5, 1973, Bergen, Norway.Google Scholar

(1975). Report of the Codex Committee on Fish and Fishery Products, Tenth Session, September 24–October 4, Bergen, Norway.Google Scholar

(1977). Report of the Tenth Session of the Coordinating Committee for Europe, Vienna, Alinorm 78/19, June 13–17.Google Scholar

(1978). Report of the Twelfth Session of the Codex Committee on Fish and Fishery Products, Bergen (Norway), October 3–8, 1977.Google Scholar

(1978). Report of the Twelfth Codex Alimentarius Commission, Alinorm 78/41, Rome, April 17–28.Google Scholar

(1985). Codex Stan. 152–1985, Codex Standard for Wheat Flour.Google Scholar

(1991). Report on the Nineteenth Session of the Codex Alimentarius Commission, Alinorm 91/40, Rome, July 1–10.Google Scholar

(1993). Report on the Twentieth Session of the Codex Alimentarius Commission, Geneva, Alinorm 93/40, June 28–July 7.Google Scholar

(1995). Codex Procedural Manual, Tenth Edition.Google Scholar

(1996). Report of the Fifth Session of the Codex Committee on Natural Mineral Waters, Thun, Switzerland, Alinorm 97/20, October 3–5.Google Scholar

(1997). Report of the Twenty-Second Session of the Joint FAO/WHO Codex Alimentarius Commission, Alinorm 97/37, Geneva, June 23–28.Google Scholar

(2000). Twenty-Fourth Session, Geneva, July 2–7, 2001, Report of the Twenty-Fourth Session of the Codex Committee on Fish and Fishery Products, June 5–9.Google Scholar

(2001). Twenty-Fourth Session of the Codex Alimentarius Commission, Geneva, July 2–7.Google Scholar

(2001). Statements of Principle Concerning the Role of Science in the Codex Decision-Making Process and the Extent to Which Other Factors Are Taken into Account. (Adopted in 1995, amended in 2001).Google Scholar

(2004). Procedural Manual, Fourteenth Edition.Google Scholar

(2006). Understanding the Codex Alimentarius, Third Edition.Google Scholar

(2010). Codex Trust Fund Mid-Term Review, Final Report, CX/CAC 10/33/14 Add. 1, April 30.Google Scholar

(2010). Codex Stan. 299–2010, Standard for Apples.Google Scholar

(2011). Report of the 16th Session of the Codex Committee on Fresh Fruits and Vegetables, Mexico City, Mexico, May 1–5.Google Scholar

(2012). Report of the Thirty-Fifth Session of the Codex Alimentarius Commission, Rome, Italy, July 2–7.Google Scholar

(2012). Codex Alimentarius Commission 35th Session, Communication from ISO (Report of Activities Relevant to Codex Work), FAO Headquarters Rome, Italy, July 2–7.Google Scholar

(2013). Report of the Thirty-Sixth Session of the Codex Alimentarius Commission, FAO Headquarters, Rome, Italy, July 1–5.Google Scholar

(2014). Procedural Manual, Twenty-Second Edition.Google Scholar

(2014). Strategic Plan 2014–2019.Google Scholar

(2014). Report of the 37th Session of the Codex Alimentarius Commission, CICG Geneva, Switzerland, July 14–18.Google Scholar

(2014). Codex Committee on Fresh Fruits and Vegetables 18th Session Phuket, Thailand, February 24–28, Review of the Terms of Reference of the Codex Committee on Fresh Fruits and Vegetables (Prepared by the Electronic Working Group Led by Japan), CX/FFV XE “FFV” 14/18/11.Google Scholar

(2015). Report of the Twenty-Ninth Session of the Codex Committee on General Principles, Paris, France, March 9–13.Google Scholar

(2015). Report of the Thirty-Eighth Session of the Codex Alimentarius Commission, CICG, Geneva, Switzerland, July 6–11.Google Scholar

(2015). Final Project Evaluation, CX/CAC 15/38/18-Add.3.Google Scholar

(2015). Codex Trust Fund 2, Project Document, December.Google Scholar

(2016). CAC, Report of the Thirty-Ninth Session of the Codex Alimentarius Commission, FAO Headquarters, Rome Italy, June 27–July 1.Google Scholar

(1998). Standards in International Trade. Summary of Proceedings, Round Table on the Impact of Standards on International Trade, Geneva, June 15.Google Scholar

(2008). Terms of Reference and Rules of Procedure of the Executive Committee of the European Commission for Europe, ECE/EX/3/Rev.1.Google Scholar

(2008). Committee on Trade, Working Party on Agricultural Quality Standards Sixty-Fourth Session, Geneva, November 3–6, Report of the Working Party on Agricultural Quality, ECE/TRADE/C/WP.7/2008/25, November 10.Google Scholar

(2009). Terms of Reference and Rules of Procedure of the European Commission for Europe, E/ECE/778rev.5.Google Scholar

(2012). Working Procedures of the Working Party on Agricultural Quality Standards (WP.7) and Its Specialized Sections.Google Scholar

(2012). Committee on Trade, Working Party on Agricultural Quality Standards, Sixty-Eighth Session, Geneva, November 5–7, Revision of the Geneva Protocol. Legal Office Opinion on the Legal Status of the Geneva Protocol.Google Scholar

(2013). Committee on Trade, Working Party on Agricultural Quality Standards, Sixty-Ninth Session of the Working Party on Agricultural Quality Standards (WP.7), November 4–6, Salle V, Palais des Nations, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar

(2014). Committee on Trade, Working Party on Agricultural Quality Standards, Seventieth Session of the Working Party on Agricultural Quality Standards (WP.7), November 3–5, Palais des Nations, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar

(2015). Steering Committee on Trade Capacity and Standards, Working Party on Agricultural Quality Standards, Geneva Understanding on Agricultural Quality Standards, ECE/CTCS/WP.7/2015/22, October 6.Google Scholar

(1997). Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade, Restrictive Trade Effects of Standards, Technical Regulations and Conformity Assessment Procedures, Background Paper by the Secretariat, Doc. G/TBT/W/42.Google Scholar

(1997). Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade, Note from the European Community. First Three-Year Review of the Operation and Implementation of the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade Annexed to the Marrakech Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization, G/TBT/W/36, March 25.Google Scholar

(1997). Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade, Note from the Government of Japan. The following paper with respect to the Triennial Review of the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade has been received from the delegation of Japan with the request that it be circulated to Members of the Committee, G/TBT/W/39, April 15.Google Scholar

(1997). Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade, US Paper on the First Triennial Review, G/TBT/W/40, April 25.Google Scholar

(1997). Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade, First Triennial Review of the Operation and Implementation of the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade of the World Trade Organization. Communication from Mexico, G/TBT/W/48, August 5.Google Scholar

(1997). Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade, Philippine Paper on the First Triennial Review Communication from the Philippines, G/TBT /W/54, September 30.Google Scholar

(1997). Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade, First Three-Year Review of the Operation and Implementation of the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (Article 15.4). Communication from Egypt, G/TBT/W/56, October 9.Google Scholar

(1997). Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade, First Triennial Review of the Operation and Implementation of the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade, November 19, G/TBT/5.Google Scholar

(1998). Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade, Minutes of the Meeting Held on March 27 1998, May 27, G/TBT/M/11.Google Scholar

(1998). Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade, Minutes of the Meeting Held on July 1, 1998, September 9, G/TBT/M/12.Google Scholar

(1998). Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade, Transparency in International Standards Draft US Proposal for a Decision. Contribution from the United States, June 30, 1998, G/TBT/W/75.Google Scholar

(1998). Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade, On the Conditions for Acceptance and Use of International Standards in the Context of the WTO Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement. Note from the European Community, September 14, 1998, Doc. G/TBT/W/87.Google Scholar

(1999). Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade, Minutes of the Meeting Held on November 20, 1998, February 10, G/TBT/M/14.Google Scholar

(1999). Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade, Minutes of the Meeting Held on March 31, 1999, May 3, G/TBT/M/15.Google Scholar

(1999). Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade, Information Provided by Bodies Involved in the Preparation of International Standards, March 26, 1999, G/TBT/W/106.Google Scholar

(1999). Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade, Issues Concerning International Standards and International Standardization Bodies. Submission from Japan, June 15, 1999, G/TBT/W/113.Google Scholar

(1999). Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade, Transparency in International Standards Draft US Proposal for a Decision. Contribution from the United States, June 17, 1999, Doc. G/TBT/W/75/Rev.1.Google Scholar

(1999). Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade, Minutes of the Meeting Held on June 11, 1999, May 3, G/TBT/M/16.Google Scholar

(1999). Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade, On the Conditions for Acceptance and Use of International Standards in the Context of the WTO Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement. Note from the European Community, Revision September 30, 1999, G/TBT/W/87/Rev.1.Google Scholar

(1999). Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade, Amendment of the TBT Agreement, Proposal by Japan, October 7, 1999, Doc. G/TBT/W/121.Google Scholar

(1999). Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade, Minutes of the Meeting Held on October 1, 1999, November 12, G/TBT/M/17.Google Scholar

(2000). Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade, WTO/TBT Agreement and International Standards. Communication from the IEC and ISO, March 29, G/TBT/W/131.Google Scholar

(2000). Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade, Minutes of the Meeting Held on February 25, 2000, May 3, G/TBT/M/18.Google Scholar

(2000). Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade, Minutes of the Meeting Held on June 17–19, June 27, May, G/TBT/M/19.Google Scholar

(2000). Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade, Good Practice for the Acceptance of Results of Conformity Assessment, Second Triennial Review of the Agreement: Contributions from Australia, July 28, G/TBT/W/138.Google Scholar

(2000). Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade, Second Triennial Review of the Operation and Implementation of the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade, November 13, G/TBT/9.Google Scholar

(2000). Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade, Second Triennial Review of the Agreement. International Standards, Contributions by Australia, July 28, 2000, G/TBT/W/139.Google Scholar

(2000). Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade, Brazilian Proposal to the Second Triennial Review of the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade, Contributions from Brazil, July 28, G/TBT/W/140.Google Scholar

(2000). Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade, Minutes of the Meeting Held on July 21, 2000, August 29, G/TBT/M/20.Google Scholar

(2000). Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade, Issues Concerning Standards. Submission by Japan, October 2, 2000, G/TBT/W/144.Google Scholar

(2000). Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade, Minutes of the Meeting Held on October 6, 2000, October 31, G/TBT/M/21.Google Scholar

(2000). Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade, Minutes of the Meeting Held on November 10, 2000, December 11, G/TBT/M/22.Google Scholar

(2001). Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade, Dissemination of Activities in Relation with the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, October 8, G/TBT/W/170.Google Scholar

(2002). Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade, Actions to Increase Participation of Developing Country Members in the Work of Relevant International Standard Setting Organizations, Information from International Organizations, Report of the Director General, February 27, G/TBT/W/172.Google Scholar