Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T05:55:16.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - A different approach to the external trade requirement of GATT Article XXIV: assessing ‘other regulations of commerce’ in the context of EU enlargement and its heightened regulatory standards

from PART III - Responding to international economic law commitments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2011

Susy Frankel
Affiliation:
Victoria University of Wellington
Meredith Kolsky Lewis
Affiliation:
Victoria University of Wellington
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Disappointed with the pace of multilateral trade talks, WTO members have turned towards regionalism, which has undermined the global trading system. Thus, regionalism has been influenced by political and other socioeconomic factors. Moreover, in some regulatory fields, multilateral rules have not been sufficiently developed or are not easily susceptible to consensus. Therefore, regional trade agreements (RTAs) operate increasingly in those fields, which may be problematic for third countries affected by regional trade. Developing countries might especially be affected by RTAs since there are no effectively enforced multilateral rules and thus no meaningful control mechanisms over RTAs. Some RTAs are particularly advanced in achieving WTO-plus provisions in the absence of multilateral rules. This feature of RTAs has led some to assess them as ‘building blocks’ since they argue that RTAs serve as a platform for new rule-making exercises. Others, who are critical about regionalist trends, point out the risk the multilateral trading system (MTS) runs due to fragmenting trade rules at the regional level, and thus increases the difficulty in agreeing multilaterally on new issues.

Furthermore, it is largely accepted that GATT Article XXIV, which regulates regional trade agreements, lacks clarity. There have been several attempts to clarify it and an Understanding on the Interpretation of Article XXIV has been reached, yet questions remain. Arguably, the Understanding brings significant clarification of the text of Article XXIV through legislative action only to the internal trade requirement in relation to customs unions (CU).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Mavroidis, P. C., ‘If I Don't Do It, Somebody Else Will (Or Won't): Testing the Compliance of Preferential Trade Agreements With the Multilateral Rules’, Journal of World Trade, 40 (2006) 187, p. 197Google Scholar
Maskus, K. E. and Wilson, J. S. (eds.), Quantifying the Impact of Technical Barriers to Trade: Can it be done? (Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press, 2001)CrossRef
Trachtman, J. P., ‘Toward Open Recognition? Standardization and Regional Integration Under Article XXIV of GATT’, Journal of International Economic Law, 6 (2003) 459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, A. D. and N. J. S. Lockhart, ‘Legal Requirements for PTAs under the WTO’ in S. Lester and B. Mercurio (eds.), Bilateral and Regional Trade Agreements: Commentary and Analysis (Cambridge University Press, 2009)Google Scholar
Mathis, J. H., Regional Trade Agreements in the GATT/WTO: Article XXIV and the Internal Trade Requirement (The Hague, T.M.C. Asser Press, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marceau, G. and Reiman, C., ‘When and How Is a Regional Trade Agreement Compatible with the WTO?’, Legal Issues of Economic Integration, 28 (2001) 297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
J-A. Crawford and Laird, S., ‘Regional Trade Agreements and the WTO’, North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 12 (2001) 193Google Scholar
Chase, K., ‘Multilateralism Compromised: The Mysterious Origins of GATT Article XXIV’, World Trade Review, 5 (2006) 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilf, M., ‘The Single European Act and 1992: Legal Implications for Third Countries’, European Journal of International Law, 1 (1990) 89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eeckhout, P., ‘The EU and its Member States in the WTO – Issues of Responsibility’ in Bartels, L. and Ortino, F. (eds.), Regional Trade Agreements and the WTO Legal System (Oxford University Press, 2007)Google Scholar
A. Von Bogdandy and Makatsch, T., ‘Collision, Co-existence or Co-operation? Prospects for the Relationship between WTO Law and European Union Law’ in Búrca, G. and Scott, J. (eds.), The EU and the WTO: Legal and Constitutional Issues (Oxford and Portland OR, Hart Publishing, 2001)Google Scholar
Hudec, R., ‘Discussion on “GATT's Influence on Regional Arrangements” by J. M. Finger’ in Melo, J. and Panagariya, A. (eds.), New Dimensions in Regional Integration (Centre for Economic Policy Research, Cambridge University Press, 1993)Google Scholar
Bartels, L., ‘The Legality of the EC Mutual Recognition Clause under WTO Law’, Journal of International Economic Law, 8 (2005) 691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, J. H., Davey, W. J. and Sykes, A. O., Legal Problems of International Economic Relations, Cases, Materials and Text on the National and International Regulation of Transnational Economic Relations, 4th edn (St Paul, MN, West Group, 2002)Google Scholar
Craig, P. and Búrca, G., EU Law: Text, Cases and Materials, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press, 1998)Google Scholar
Pelkmans, J., ‘The New Approach to Technical Harmonization and Standardization’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 25 (1987) 249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, A. R., ‘The Incidental Fortress: The Single European Market and World Trade’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 42 (2004) 393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, D. and Pope, H., EU Food Law and Policy (The Hague/London/New York, Kluwer Law International, 2004)Google Scholar
Drabek, Z., ‘Regionalism and Trade Discipline’ in Drabek, Z. (ed.), Can Regional Integration Arrangements Enforce Trade Discipline? The Story of the EU Enlargement (New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2005)Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, J., ‘The Puzzle of WTO Safeguards and Regional Trade Agreements’, Journal of International Economic Law, 7 (2004) 109, pp. 131–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockhart, N. J. S. and Mitchell, A. D., ‘Regional Trade Agreements Under GATT 1994: An Exception and Its Limits’ in Mitchell, A. D. (ed.), Challenges and Prospects for the WTO (London, Cameron May, 2005)Google Scholar
McMillan, J., ‘Does Regional Integration Foster Open Trade? Economic Theory and GATT's Article XXIV’ in K. Anderson and R. Blackhurst (eds.), Regional Integration and the Global Trading System (London, Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1993)Google Scholar
Cho, S., ‘Defragmenting World Trade’, Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business, 27 (2006) 39Google Scholar
Otsuki, T., Wilson, J. S. and Sewadeh, M., ‘Saving Two in a Billion: Quantifying the Trade Effect of European Food Safety Standards on African Exports’, Food Policy, 26 (2001) 495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majone, G., ‘The Credibility Crisis of Community Regulation’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 38 (2000) 273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buonanno, L., Zablotney, S. and Keefer, R., ‘Politics versus Science in the Making of a New Regulatory Regime for Food in Europe’, European Integration Online Papers, 5 (2001) 1Google Scholar
Bernauer, T. and Caduff, L., ‘European Food Safety: Multilevel Governance, Re-Nationalization or Centralization?’, University of Zürich, (Center for Comparative and International Studies Working Paper No. 3, 2004)Google Scholar
Young, A. R. and Holmes, P., ‘Protection or Protectionism? EU Food Safety and the WTO’ in Ansell, C. and Vogel, D. (eds.), What's the Beef? The Contested Governance of European Food Safety Regulation (London, MIT Press, 2006)Google Scholar
,World Trade Organization, World Trade Report 2007 (Geneva, 2007)Google Scholar
Piermartini, R. and Budetta, M., ‘A Mapping of Regional Rules on Technical Barriers to Trade’, presented workshops on Regional Rules and the Global Trading System (Washington DC, 26–27 July 2006)Google Scholar
Mavroidis, P. C., ‘Judicial Supremacy, Judicial Restraint, and the Issue of Consistency of Preferential Trade Agreements with the WTO: The Apple in the Picture’ in D. L. M. Kennedy and J. D. Southwick (eds.), The Political Economy of International Trade Law: Essays in Honor of Robert E. Hudec (Cambridge University Press, 2002)Google Scholar
Howse, R., ‘The Most Dangerous Branch? WTO Appellate Body Jurisprudence on the Nature and Limits of the Judicial Power’ in Cottier, T. and Mavroidis, P. C. (eds.), P. Blatter (ass. ed.), The Role of the Judge in International Trade Regulation: Experience and Lessons for the WTO, The World Trade Forum, 4 vols. (Ann Arbor MI, University of Michigan Press, 2003)Google Scholar
Sutherland, P., ‘Political Challenges to the World Trading System’ in Petersmann, E-U. (ed.), Reforming the World Trading System, Legitimacy, Efficiency and Democratic Governance (Oxford University Press, 2005)Google Scholar
Dam, K. W., ‘Cordell Hull, Reciprocity and the WTO’ in Petersmann, (ed.), Reforming the World Trading System, Legitimacy, Efficiency and Democratic Governance (Oxford University Press, 2005)Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×