Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2012
  • Online publication date: December 2012

3 - Harm reduction at the UN: member state tension and systemic dissonance

Summary

Harm reduction is the dye that once injected into the international drug control system reveals the extent of the tensions within it.

Daniel Wolfe, 2008

By the time national delegations met for the HLS of the CND in March 2009, the UN General Assembly (UNGA) had twice unanimously endorsed its commitment to provide people at risk of HIV with harm reduction services, including NSPs. Observers of events in Vienna, however, could be forgiven for overlooking the commitments made in New York in 2001 and 2006. As the UNGASS decade saw the practice of soft defection from the GDPR become increasingly apparent in the national policy choices of some regime members, so parallel and often very heated debates on the issue of harm reduction became more commonplace within the Commission on Narcotic Drugs; especially its Committee of the Whole (COW) where resolutions are debated and usually agreed. Within a regime well populated by a range of diverse states, there will of course always be a certain degree of debate and disagreement concerning the actions of individual nations and any desire to influence and shape the structure of which they are a part. In this regard, treaty making is a process rather than a one-off event. Diplomats and international civil servants involved with drug control at the UN are thus quick to stress that energetic discussion within and around the Commission is a natural and indeed healthy characteristic of the regime’s operation. This may be the case. Yet the emergence of such fundamentally different positions on harm reduction among a range of actors within the regime between 1998 and 2009 must be seen as more than the standard functioning of a stable multilateral structure. Rather, it was a manifestation, at times very visible, of extraordinary internal tension.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
Krasner, S. D.International RegimesCornell University Press 1983
Cassese, A.International LawOxford University Press 2005
Macbeth, A.International Economic Actors and Human RightsLondonRoutledge 2010
INCBReport of the International Narcotics Control Board for 2003New YorkUnited Nations 2004
Room, R.Trends and Issues in the International Drug Control System – Vienna 2003Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 37, 2005 377
UNODCWorld Drug Report 2008ViennaUnited Nations 2008
Schechter, M. T.Science, Ideology and Needle Exchange ProgramsThe Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 582, 2002 94
Bertram, E.Blachman, M.Sharpe, K.Andreas, P.Drug War Politics: The Price of DenialUniversity of California Press 1996
Mooney, C.The Republican War on ScienceNew YorkBasic Books 2005
Colquhoun, D.The Highs and Lows of Policy Based EvidenceBritish Medical Journal 339, b4564 2009
Vaughn, J. S.Villalobos, J. D.The Obama Administration’s Challenges after the “War on Science”: Reforming Staffing Practices and Protecting Scientific Integrity in the Executive BranchReview of Policy Research 26, 2009 803
2005 http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle/375/soudercircus.shtml
Blickman, T.Bewley-Taylor, D.The UNGASS Evaluation Process EvaluatedWitley, SurreyInternational Drug Policy Consortium 2006
Carstairs, C.The Stages of the International Drug Control SystemDrug and Alcohol Review, 24, 2005 62
Nadelmann, E. A.Commonsense Drug PolicyForeign Affairs 77, 1998 124
UNODC2005 World Drug ReportViennaUnited Nations 2005
Thoumi, F. E.Can the United Nations support “objective” and unhampered illicit drug policy research?Crime, Law and Social Change 38, 2002 180
Watson, R.US Official Preaches Benefits of “Drug Courts” in Curbing MisuseBritish Medical Journal 330, 2005 560
Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDSIntensifying HIV Prevention: UNAIDS Policy Position PaperGenevaUnited Nations 2005
2003
IDPCThe 2007 Commission on Narcotic DrugsWitley, SurreyInternational Drug Policy Consortium 2007
2007
2007
McLaren, R. I.The UN System and its Quixotic Quest for CoordinationInternational Organization 34, 1980 139
Barnett, Rules for the World. International Organizations in Global PoliticsCornell University Press 2004
Wolfe, D.War on Drugs, HIV/AIDS and Human RightsNew York, Amsterdam, BrusselsInternational Debate Education Association 2004
INCBReport of the International Narcotics Control Board for 2001New YorkUnited Nations 2000
Wolfe, D.Malinowska-Sempruch, K.Illicit Drug Policies and the Global HIV Epidemic: Effects of UN and National Government ApproachesInternational Harm Reduction and Development, Open Society InstituteNew York 2004
Trace, M.Riley, D.Stimson, G.UNAIDS and the Prevention of HIV Infection Through Injecting Drug UseBeckley, Oxon.The Beckley Foundation Drug Policy Programme 2005
Wilson, A.Illicit Drugs Convention Reform and the United Nations AgenciesParisThe Senlis Council 2002
Cook, C.Kanaef, N.Global State of Harm Reduction 2008. Mapping the Response to Drug-related HIV and Hepatitis C EpidemicsIHRA 2008
Barrett, D.Security, Development and Human Rights: Normative, Legal and Policy Challenges for the International Drug Control SystemInternational Journal of Drug Policy 21, 2010 140
Bewley-Taylor, D. R.Emerging Policy Contradictions between the United Nations Drug Control System and the Core Values of the United NationsInternational Journal of Drug Policy 16, 2005 423
Ree, E. VanDrugs as a Human RightInternational Journal of Drug Policy 10, 1999 89
Fidler, D. P.International Law and Infectious DiseasesOxfordClarendon Press 1999
Gilmore, N.Drug Use and Human Rights: Privacy, Disability, and Human Rights InfringementsJournal of Contemporary Health and Law 12, 1996 356
Boister, N.Penal Aspects of the UN Drug ConventionsThe Hague, London, BostonKluwer International 2001
Hunt, P.Protecting the Human Rights of Injection Drug Users: The Impact of HIV and AIDSNew YorkInternational Harm Reduction and Development, Open Society Institute 2005
Farer, T. J.Gaer, F.United Nations: Divided WorldOxford University Press 1993
Annan, K.In Larger Freedom: Decision Time at the UNForeign Affairs 84, 2005 63
Barrett, D.Nowak, M.The Diversity of International Law: Essays in Honour of Professor Kalliopi K. KoufaLeiden, the NetherlandsBrill/Martinus Nijhoff 2009
Lines, R. 2007
Lines, R.A ‘Most Serious Crime’? – The Death Penalty for Drug Offences and International Human Rights LawAmicus Journal 21 2010 21
Open Society InstituteAt What Cost? HIV and Human Rights Consequences of the Global ‘War on Drugs’New YorkOpen Society Institute Public Health Program 2009
Elliott, R.Establishing Safe Injection Facilities in Canada: Legal and Ethical IssuesMontrealCanadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network 2002
Ezard, N.Public Health, Human Rights and the Harm Reduction Paradigm: From Risk Reduction to Vulnerability ProtectionInternational Journal of Drug Policy 12, 2001 207
Boister, N.Human Rights Protections in the Suppression ConventionsHuman Rights Law Review 2, 2002 199
Elliot, R.Harm Reduction, HIV/AIDS and the Human Rights Challenge to Global Drug Control PolicyHealth and Human Rights: An International Journal 8, 2005 104
Mena, F.Narcophobia: Drugs Prohibition and the Generation of Human Rights AbusesTrends in Organized Crime 13, 2009 60
Cohen, J.Injecting Reason: Human Rights and HIV Prevention for Injection Drug Users, California: A Case StudyNew YorkHuman Rights Watch 2003
Elliot, R.Harm Reduction, HIV/AIDS, and the Human Rights Challenge to Global Drug Control PolicyHealth and Human Rights 8, 2005 121
Barrett, D. 2008
Barrett, D.Recalibrating the Regime: The Need for a Human Rights-Based Approach to International Drug PolicyBeckley, Oxon., UKThe Beckley Foundation Drug Policy Programme, in partnership with the International Harm Reduction Association, Human Rights Watch and the Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network 2007
Room, R.Harm Reduction: A New Direction for Drug Policies and ProgramsUniversity of Toronto Press 1997
Csete, J.The Global Politics of AIDSBoulder, ColoradoLynne Rienner 2007
IDPCThe International Narcotics Control Board: Current Tensions and Options for ReformWitley, SurreyInternational Drug Policy Consortium 2008
INCBReport of the International Narcotics Control Board for 2008New YorkUnited Nations 2009
Takahashi, SaulDrug Control, Human Rights, and the Right to the Highest Attainable Standard of Health: By No Means Straightforward IssuesHuman Rights Quarterly 31, 2009 748