American Law Institute, Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws (American Law Institute, 1971).Google Scholar

American Law Institute, Restatement (Third) of Foreign Relations Law of the United States (American Law Institute, 1989).Google Scholar

Audit, Bernard, ‘The Vienna Sales Convention and the Lex Mercatoria’, in Carbonneau, Thomas E. (ed.), Lex Mercatoria and Arbitration, (Juris Publishing, 1998), pp. 173–94.Google Scholar

Baratt, James and Ichilcik, Hayley, ‘Bribery’ (2011) The European & Middle Eastern Arbitration Review.

Basedow, Jürgen, ‘Wirtschaftskollisionsrecht’ (1988) 52 Rabels Zeitschrift für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht, 8–38.Google Scholar

Beale, Hugh (ed.), Chitty on Contracts, 31st edn, 2 vols. (Sweet & Maxwell, 2012).Google Scholar

Beale, Hugh, ‘English Law Reform and the Impact of European Contract Law’ in Vogenauer, Stefan and Weatherill, Stephen (eds.), Harmonization of European Contract Law (Hart Publishing, 2006), pp. 31–8.Google Scholar

Beatson, Jack, Burrows, Andrew and Cartwright, John, Anson’s Law of Contract, 29th edn (Oxford University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berg, Albert Jan, ‘The Application of the New York Convention by the Courts’, in van den Berg, Albert Jan, (ed.), Improving the Efficiency of Arbitration Agreements and Awards: 40 Years of Application of the New York Convention ICCA Congress Series No. 9 (Kluwer Law International, 1999), , pp. 25–34.Google Scholar

Berg, Albert Jan, ‘Consolidated Commentary on the New York Convention’ ICCA Yearbook Commercial Arbitration XXVIII (Kluwer International, 2003)

Berg, Albert Jan, The New York Arbitration Convention of 1958 (Deventer, 1981).Google Scholar

Berger, Klaus Peter, The Creeping Codification of the Lex Mercatoria, 2nd edn (Kluwer Law International, 2010).Google Scholar

Blessing, Marc, ‘Choice of Substantive Law in International Arbitration’ (1997) 14(2) Journal of International Arbitration, 39–65.Google Scholar

Blessing, Marc, ‘Keynotes on Arbitral Decision-Making’: The New 1998 ICC Rules of Arbitration (1997) 14(2) Journal of International Arbitration, 39–65.Google Scholar

Bodgan, Michael, ‘1980 års EC-konvention om tillämping lag på kontraksrättsliga förpliktelser – synpunkter beträffande den svenske innställningen’ (1982) 95 Tidsskrift for Rettsvitenskap, 1–49.Google Scholar

Bodgan, Michael, Svensk internationell privat- och prosessrätt, 7th edn (Norstedst Juridik, 2008).Google Scholar

Boek, Annuck and Hoecke, Mark, ‘The Interpretation of Standard Clauses in European Contract Law’ in Collins, Hugh (ed.), Standard Contract Terms in Europe: A Basis for and a Challenge to European Contract Law (Wolters Kluwer, 2008), pp. 201–44.Google Scholar

Bonell, Michael, An International Restatement of Contract Law (Transnational Publishers, 1997).Google Scholar

Bonell, Michael, ‘Formation of Contracts and Precontractual Liability Under the Vienna Convention on International Sale of Goods’, in ICC, Formation of Contracts and Precontractual Liability (International Chamber of Commerce, 1990), pp. 157–78.Google Scholar

Born, Gary, International Commercial Arbitration, (Kluwer Law International, 2009).Google Scholar

Born, Gary, International Commercial Arbitration: Commentary and Materials, 2nd edn (Kluwer Law International, 2001).Google Scholar

Bridge, Michael, ‘Good Faith in Commercial Contracts’ in Brownsword, Roger, Hird, Norma J. and Howells, Geraint (eds.) Good Faith in Contract (Ashgate/Dartmouth, 1999), pp. 139–64.Google Scholar

British Institute for International and Comparative Law, ‘Study on the Question of Effectiveness of an Assignments or Subrogation of a Claim Against Third Parties and the Priority of the Assigned or Subrogated Claim over a Right of Another Person’ (2012), .

Brownsword, Roger, ‘Positive, Negative, Neutral: the Reception of Good Faith in English Contract Law’ in Brownsword, Roger, Hird, Norma J. and Howells, Geraint (ed.) Good Faith in Contract (Ashgate/Dartmouth, 1999), pp. 13–40.Google Scholar

Bussani, Mauro and Mattei, Ugo, The Common Core of European Private Law Project (Kluwer Law International, 2003).Google Scholar

Cafaggi, Fabrizio, ‘Self-Regulation in European Contract Law’, in Collins, Hugh (ed.), Standard Contract Terms in Europe: A Basis for and a Challenge to European Contract Law (Wolters Kluwer, 2008).Google Scholar

Canuel, Edward T., ‘Comparing Exculpatory Clauses under Anglo-American Law: Testing Total Legal Convergence’, in Cordero-Moss, Giuditta (ed.), Boilerplate clauses, International Commercial Contracts and the Applicable Law (Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 80–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carrington, Paul D. and Hagen, Paul H., ‘Contract and Jurisdiction’ (1997) 8 The Supreme Court Review, 331–402.Google Scholar

Carruthers, Janeen M., The Transfer of Property in the Conflict of Laws (Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Collins, Hugh, ‘The Freedom to Circulate Documents: Regulating Contracts in Europe’ (2004) 10 European Law Journal, 787–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collins, Hugh, ‘Social Rights, General Clauses and the Acquis Communitaire’, in Grundmann, Stefan and Mazeaud, Denis (eds.), General Clauses and Standards in European Contract Law (Kluwer Law International, 2006), pp. 111–40.Google Scholar

Collins, Lawrence, Mase, C. G. J., McClean, David, Briggs, Adrain, Harris, Jonathan, McLachlan, Campbell, Dickenson, Andrew and McEleary, Peter, Dicey, Morris & Collins on the Conflict of Laws, 15th edn (Sweet & Maxwell, 2012).Google Scholar

Commission of the European Communities, Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament (2006), .

Commission on European Contract Law, The Principles of European Contract Law (PECL) (European Union, 2002), .

Cordero-Moss, Giuditta, ‘Arbitration and Private International Law’ (2008) 11 International Arbitration Law Review, 153–64.Google Scholar

Cordero-Moss, Giuditta, Boilerplate Clauses, International Commercial Contracts and the Applicable Law (Cambridge University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cordero-Moss, Giuditta, ‘Commercial Arbitration and Investment Arbitration: Fertile Soil for False Friends?’, in Binder, Cristina, Kriebaum, Ursula, Reinisch, August and Wittich, Stephan (eds.), International Investment Law for the 21st Century – Essays in Honour of Christoph Schreuer (Oxford University Press, 2009), pp. 782–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cordero-Moss, Giuditta, ‘Consumer Protection Except for Good Commercial Practice: A Satisfactory Regime for Commercial Contracts?’, in Schulze, Reiner (ed.), CFR and Existing EC Contract Law (Sellier European Law Publishers, 2009), pp. 78–94.Google Scholar

Cordero-Moss, Giuditta, ‘Direct Action Against the Insurer: A Recent Decision by the Norwegian Supreme Court Illustrates the Norwegian Approach to Private International Law’, in Einhorn, Talia and Siehr, Kurt, (eds.), Intercontinental Cooperation Through Private International Law – Essays in Memory of Peter E. Nygh (Asser Press, 2002), pp. 55–67.Google Scholar

Cordero-Moss, Giuditta, ‘Does the Use of Common Law Contract Models Give Rise to a Tacit Choice of Law or to a Harmonised, Transnational Interpretation?’, in Cordero-Moss, Giuditta (ed.), Boilerplate Clauses, International Commercial Contracts and the Applicable Law (Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 37–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cordero-Moss, Giuditta, ‘International Arbitration is not only International’, in Cordero-Moss, Giuditta (ed.), International Commercial Arbitration: Different Forms and their Features (Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 7–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cordero-Moss, Giuditta, International Commercial Arbitration. Different Forms and their Features (Cambridge University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cordero-Moss, Giuditta, International Commercial Arbitration – Party Autonomy and Mandatory Rules (Tano Aschehoug, 1999).Google Scholar

Cordero-Moss, Giuditta, ‘International Contracts Between Common Law and Civil Law: Is Non-State Law to be Preferred? The Difficulty of Interpreting Legal Standards such as Good Faith’ (2007) 7(1) Global Jurist Advances1–38.Google Scholar

Cordero-Moss, Giuditta, Lectures on Comparative Law of Contracts (University of Oslo Institute of Private Law, 2004), .Google Scholar

Cordero-Moss, Giuditta, ‘Revision of the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules: Further Steps’ (2010) 1 International Law Review, 96–9Google Scholar

Cordero-Moss, Giuditta, ‘The Function of Letters of Intent and Their Recognition in Modern Legal Systems’, in Schulze, Reiner (ed.), New Features in Contract Law (Sellier European Law Publishers, 2007), pp. 139–59.Google Scholar

Cordero-Moss, Giuditta, ‘Tvangsfullbyrdelse av utenlandske voldgiftsavgjørelser,’ (2000) 1 Nytt i Privatretten15–16.Google Scholar

Cordero-Moss, Giuditta and Echenberg, David et al., Transcript of the APA Seminar 21 Nov 2011 (2011), .

Dannemann, Gerhard, ‘Common Law Based Contracts under German Law’, in Cordero-Moss, Giuditta (ed.), Boilerplate Clauses, International Commercial Contracts and the Applicable Law (Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 62–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dasser, Felix, Internationale Schiedsgerichte und Lex mercatoria. Rechtsvergleichender Beitrag zur Diskussion über ein nicht-staatliches Handelsrecht (Sculthess Olygraphischer Verlag, 1989).Google Scholar

De Ly, Filip, International Business Law and Lex Mercatoria (TMC Asser Institute, 1992).Google Scholar

De Nova, Giorgio, ‘The Romanistic Tradition: Application of Boilerplate Clauses under Italian Law’ in Cordero-Moss, Giuditta (ed.), Boilerplate Clauses, International Commercial Contracts and the Applicable Law (Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 227–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Derains, Yves and Scwhartz, Eric, A Guide to the New ICC Rules of Arbitration, (Kluwer Law International, 1998).Google Scholar

Derains, Yves and Scwhartz, Eric, Guide to the ICC Rules of Arbitration, 2nd edn (Kluwer Law International, 1998)Google Scholar

Dirk, Otto and Elwan, Omaia, ‘Article V(2)’, in Kronke, Herbert and Nacimiento, Patricia (eds.), Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards: A Global Commentary on the New York Convention (Kluwer Law International, 2010), pp. 345–414.Google Scholar

Drobnig, Ulrich, ‘Das Profil des Wirtschaftskollisionrechts’ (1988) 52 Rabels Zeitschrift für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht, 1–7.Google Scholar

Echenberg, David, ‘Negotiating International Contracts: Does the Process Invite a Review of Standard Contracts from the Point of View of a National Legal Requirements?’ in Cordero-Moss, Giuditta (ed.), Boilerplate Clauses, International Commercial Contracts and the Applicable Law (Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 11–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eidemüller, Horst et al, ‘The Common Frame of Reference for European Private Law – Policy Choices and Codification Problems’ (2008) 28(4) Oxford Journal of Legal Studies659–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Engel, Christoph, ‘Die Bedeutung des Völkerrechts für die Anwendung in- und ausländischen Wirschaftsrechts’ (1988) 52 Rabels Zeitschrift für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht, 271–302.Google Scholar

Fawcett, James, Carruthers, Janeen and North, Peter, Cheshire, North & Fawcett: Private International Law, 14th edn (Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Fern, M. D., Warren’s Forms of Agreements (LexisNexis, 2004), vol. II.Google Scholar

Ferrari, F. (ed.), The CISG and its Impact on National Legal Systems (Sellier, 2008)Google Scholar

Ferreri, Silvia, ‘Complexity of Transnational Sources’, in Brown, Karen B. and Snyder, David V. (eds.), General Reports of the XVIIIth Congress of the International Academy of Comparative Law (Springer Law, 2012), pp. 29–56.Google Scholar

Ferreri, Silvia, The Italian National Report XVII Congress of the International Academy of Comparative Law, Section II-B1, Private International Law, Utrecht (16–16 July 2006).

Flambouras, D., ‘The Doctrines of Impossibility of Performance and Clausula Rebus Sic Stantibus in the 1980 Vienna Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods and the Principles of European Contract Law: A Comparative Analyses’ (2001) 13 Pace International Law Review, 261–93, .Google Scholar

Flessner, Alex and Verhagen, Hendrik, Assignment in European Private International Law (Sellier European Law Publishers, 2006).Google Scholar

Fontaine, Marcel and De Ly, Filip, Drafting International Contracts: An Analysis of Contract Clauses (Brill Academic Publishers, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gaillard, Emmanuel and Savage, John (eds.), Fouchard, Gaillard and Goldman on International Commercial Arbitration (Kluwer Law International, 2004).Google Scholar

Gaja, Giorgio, ‘Sulle norme applicabili al merito secondo la nuova disciplina dell’Arbitrato internazionale’, Rivista dell’Arbitrato (Giuffrè, 1994).Google Scholar

Gambaro, Antonio and Sacco, Rodolfo, Sistemi giuridici comparati (Utet Giuridica, 2002).Google Scholar

Giardina, Andrea, ‘La legge n. 25 del 1994 internazionale’, Rivista dell’Arbitrato (Giuffrè, 1994).Google Scholar

Giuliano, Mario and Lagarde, Paul, Report on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations (1980) OJ C 282.

Goode, Roy, ‘Usage and its Reception in Transnational Commercial Law’ (1997) 46 International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goode, Roy, Kronke, Herbert and McKendrick, Ewan, Transnational Commercial Law – Texts, Cases and Materials (Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Gordley, James, The Philosophical Origins of Moderns Contract Doctrine (Oxford University Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Gorton, Lars, ‘The Nordic Tradition: Application of Boilerplate Clauses under Swedish Law’, in Cordero-Moss, Giuditta (ed.), Boilerplate Clauses, International Commercial Contracts and the Applicable Law (Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 276–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Graziadei, Michele, ‘Variations on the Concept of Contract in a European Perspective: Some Unresolved Issues’, in Schulze, Reiner (ed.), New Features in Contract Law (Sellier European Law Publisher, 2007), pp. 311–324.Google Scholar

Grosheide, W., ‘The Duty to Deal Fairly in Commercial Contracts’, in Grundmann, Stefan and Mazeaud, Denis (eds.), General Clauses and Standards in European Contract Law (Aspen Publishers, 2006), pp. 197–204.Google Scholar

Hagstrøm, Viggo, Obligasjonsrett, 2nd edn (Universitetsforlaget, 2011).Google Scholar

Hagstrøm, Viggo, ‘The Nordic Tradition: Application of Boilerplate Clauses under Norwegian Law’, in Cordero-Moss, Giuditta (ed.), Boilerplate Clauses, International Commercial Contracts and the Applicable law (Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 265–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hague Conference on Private International Law, ‘Some Reflections on the Present State of Negotiations on the Judgments Project in the Context of the Future Work Program of the Conference’, Preliminary Document No 16 of February 2002 (2002), .

Halpern, Joseph, ‘Exorbitant Jurisdiction and the Brussels Convention: Toward a Theory of Restraint’, in Reisman, Michael (ed.), Jurisdiction in International Law (Ashgate Publishing, 1999), pp. 369–87.Google Scholar

Hanotiau, Bernard, ‘The Law Applicable to Arbitrability’, in Albert Jan van den Berg (ed.), 40 years of Application of the the New York Convention, The Hague etc. (ICCA Congress Series No. 9, 1999) pp. 146–67.

Hartley, Trevor C., ‘Mandatory Rules in International Contracts: The Common Law Approach’, Recueil des Cours vol. 266 (The Hague Academy of International Law, 1997), vol. CCLXVI.Google Scholar

Hay, Peter, Borcher, Patrick and Symeonides, Symeon, Conflict of Laws, 5th edn (Thomson West, 2010).Google Scholar

Heuman, Lars, Arbitration Law of Sweden: Practice and Procedure (JurisNet, 2003).Google Scholar

Heuman, Lars, Current Issues in Swedish Arbitration (Kluwer, 1990).Google Scholar

Heuman, Lars, Skiljemannarätt (Nordstedts Juridik, 1999).Google Scholar

Heuman, Lars and Jarvin, S., The Swedish Arbitration Act of 1999, Five Years on: A Critical Review of Strengths and Weaknesses (JurisNet, 2006).Google Scholar

Hober, Kaj, ‘Arbitration Involving States’, in Newman, Lawrence W. and Hill, Richard D. (eds.), The Leading Arbitrators’ Guide to International Arbitration (JurisNet, 2004), pp. 139–62.Google Scholar

Honsell, P., Vogt, N. P., Schnyder, A. K. and Berti, S. V. (eds.), Basler Kommentar Internationales Privatrecht, 2nd edn (Helbing Lichtenhahn Verlag, 2007).Google Scholar

House of Lords European Union Committee, Social Policy and Consumer Affairs, 12th Report of Session 2008–2009, European Contract Law: the Draft Common Frame of Refence Report with evidence (10 June 2009), .

Houtte, Hans, The Law of International Trade, 2nd edn (Sweet & Maxwell, 2002).Google Scholar

Immenga, Ulrich, Mestmäcker, Ernst Joachim and Dannecker, Gerhard, GWB Gesetz gegen Wettbewerbsbeschränkungen Kommentar (C. H. Beck, 2001).Google Scholar

International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), The International Commercial Terms (INCOTERMS) (International Chamber of Commerce, 2010).Google Scholar

International Institute for the Unification of Private Law (UNIDROIT), ‘ALI/UNIDROIT Principles of Transnational Civil Procedure’ (2004) 9 Uniform Law Review 4, .Google Scholar

International Institute for the Unification of Private Law (UNIDROIT), Principles of International Commercial Contracts (International Institute for the Unification of Private Law, 2010), .Google Scholar

International Law Association Committee on International Civil Litigation & the Interests of the Public, Conference Resolution Sofia 2012 (International Law Association, 2012), .Google Scholar

International Law Association Committee on International Civil Litigation & the Interests of the Public, Final Report International Civil Litigation for Human Rights Violations (International Law Association, 2012), .Google Scholar

International Law Association Committee on International Commercial Arbitration, Final Report Ascertaining the Contents of the Applicable Law in International Commercial Arbitration (International Law Association, 2008), , pp. 4–21.Google Scholar

International Law Association Committee on International Commercial Arbitration, Final Report on Public Policy as a Bar to Enforcement of International Arbitration Awards (International Law Association, 2002), .Google Scholar

International Law Association Committee on International Commercial Arbitration, Interim Report on Public Policy as a Bar to Enforcement of International Arbitration Awards (International Law Association, 2000), .Google Scholar

International Swaps and Derivatives Association, ‘Response to Questionnaire’ (2006), .

Jansen, Nils and Zimmermann, Reinhard, ‘A European Civil Code in All But Name: Discussing the Nature and Purpose of the Draft Common Frame of Reference’ (2010) 69 Cambridge Law Journal, 98–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jesse, Katinka. and Verschuuren, Jonathan, ‘Litigation Against International Business Corporations for Their Actions Abroad: Recent Environmental Cases from the Netherlands’ (2011) Tilburg Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series No. 12, , 1–7.

Jhering, Rudolf, ‘Culpa in contrahendo, oder Schadenersatz bei nichtigen oder nicht zur Perfektion galangten Verträgen’ (1861) 4 Jahrbücher für die Dogmatik de heutigen römischen und deutschen Privatrechts.Google Scholar

Juenger, Friedrich K., Choice of Law and Multistate Justice (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1993).Google Scholar

Jung, Helena, ‘SCC Practice: Challenges to Arbitrators SCC Board Decisions 2005–2007’ (2008) Stockholm International Arbitration Review 1, 1–18.

Jänterä-Jareborg, Maarit, ‘Foreign Law in National Courts – A Comparative Perspective’, Recueil des cours (The Hague Academy of International Law, 2003), vol. CCCIV.Google Scholar

Kaufmann-Kohler, Gabrielle, ‘Iura novit arbiter – Est-ce bien raisonnable? Réflexions sur le statut du droit de fond devant l’arbitre international’, in Héritier, A. and Hirsch, L. (ed.), De lege ferenda – Réflexions sur le droit désirable en l’honneur du professeur Alain Hirsch (Editions Slaktine, 2004), pp. 71–8.Google Scholar

Kaufmann-Kohler, Gabrielle, ‘The Arbitrator and the Law: Does He/She Know it? Apply it? How? And a Few More Questions’ (2005) 21(4) Arbitration International631–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kegel, G., ‘The Crisis of Conflict of Laws’, Recueil des Cours (The Hague Academy of International Law, 1986), vol. CII.Google Scholar

Kessedjian, C., ‘Principe de la contradiction et arbitrage’, (1995) 3 Revue de l’arbitrage, 382–410.Google Scholar

Kondring, J, ‘Der Vertrag ist das Recht der Parteien – Zur Verwirklichung des Parteiwillens durch nachträgliche Teilrechtswahl’ (2006) 5 Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts, 425–38.Google Scholar

Konow, Berte-Elen Reinertsen, Løsørepant over landegrenser (Fagbokforlaget, 1999).Google Scholar

Kritzer, Albert H., ‘Pre-Contract Formation’, CISG Database (Pace Law School Institute of International Commercial Law, 2008), .Google Scholar

Kropholler, Jan, Internationales Privatrecht, 6th edn (Mohr Siebeck, 2006).Google Scholar

Kurkela, Matti, ‘“Jura Novit Curia” and the Burden of Education in International Arbitration – A Nordic Perspective’ (2003) 21(3) ASA Bulletin, 486–500.Google Scholar

Lagarde, Xavier, Méheut, David and Reversac, Jean-Michel, ‘The Romanistic Tradition: Application of Boilerplate Clauses under French Law’, in Cordero-Moss, Giuditta (ed.), Boilerplate Clauses, International Commercial Contracts and the Applicable Law (Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 210–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lalive, Pierre, ‘L’ordre public transnational et l’arbitre international’, in Bariatti, S. and Venturini, G. (eds.), Liber Fausto Pocar (Giuffre, 2009), pp. 599–611.Google Scholar

Lando, Ole, ‘CISG and Its Followers: A Proposal to Adopt Some International Principles of Contract Law’ (2005) 53 American Journal of Comparative Law, 379–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lando, Ole, ‘The Law Applicable to the Merits of the Dispute’ (1986) 2 Arbitration International, 104–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lando, Ole, ‘The Lex Mercatoria in International Commercial Arbitration’ (1985) 34 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 4, 747–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lando, Ole, ‘Lex Mercatoria 1985–1996’, Festskrift til Stig Strömholm (Iustus, 1997), pp. 567–584.Google Scholar

Lando, Ole, ‘The New Lex Mercatoria in International Commercial Arbitration’ (1985) International and Comparative Law Quarterly pp. 747–768.

Lando, Ole and Beale, Hugh (eds.), Principles of European Contract Law – Parts I And II (Kluwer Law International, 2002).Google Scholar

Lando, Ole, Prüm, André, Clive, Eric and Zimmerman, Richard (eds.), Principles of European Contract Law – Part III (Kluwer Law International, 2003).Google Scholar

Law Society of England and Wales, The, ‘Firms’ Cross-Border Work’ (2010), .

Lennep, W. Huding-van, ‘Anticipatory Application of a Multilateral Treaty with Uniform Conflict Rules’ (1995) 42(2) Netherlands International Law Review, 259–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lew, Julian D. M., Applicable Law in International Commercial Arbitration (Oceana Publications, 1978).Google Scholar

Liukkunen, Ulla, ‘Lex Mercatoria in International Arbitration’, in Klabbers, J. and Piiparinen, Touko (eds.), Normative Pluralism and International Law: Exploring Global Governance (Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 201–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lookofsky, J., International privatrett på formuerettens område (Jurist- og Økonomiforbundets Forlag, 1997).Google Scholar

Lowenfeld, Andreas, International Litigation and the Quest for Reasonableness: Essays in Private International Law (Clarendon Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Lowe, Alan Vaughan, ‘Ends and Means in the Settlement of International Disputes over Jurisdiction’ (1985) 11 Review of International Studies, 183–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lupoi, Michele A., Conflitti transnazionali di giurisdizione, (Giuffrè, 2002).Google Scholar

Mann, Fritz A., ‘Lex Facit Arbitrum’, in Sanders, Pieter (ed.) Liber Amicorum for Martin Domke (Martinus Nijhoff, 1967).Google Scholar

Mann, Fritz A., ‘Sonderanknüpfung und zwingendes Recht im internationalem Privatrecht’ in Festschrift für Günther Beitzke zum 70. Geburtstag (De Gruyter, 1979), pp. 607–24.Google Scholar

Mann, Fritz A., Studies in International Law (Clarendon Press, 1973).Google Scholar

Magnus, Ulrich, ‘Comparative Editorial Remarks on the Provisions regarding Good Faith in CISQ Article 8(1) and the UNIDROIT Principles Article 1.7,’ in Felemegas, J. (ed.) An International Approach to the Interpretation of the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the Internatioanl Sale of Goods (1980) as Uniform Sales Law (Cambridge University Press, 2007), pp. 45–8.Google Scholar

Magnus, Ulrich, Staudingers Kommentarzum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch mit Einführungsgesetz und Nebegesetzen (Sellier de Gruyter, 2002).Google Scholar

Magnus, Ulrich, ‘The Germanic Tradition: Application of Boilerplate Clauses under German Law’ in Cordero-Moss, Giuditta (ed.), Boilerplate Clauses, International Commercial Contracts and the Applicable Law (Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 179–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mance, Jonathan, ‘Is Europe Aiming to Civilise the Common Law?’ (2007) 18, European Business Law Review, 77–99.Google Scholar

Martinek, M., ‘Die Mitwirkungsverweigerung des Schiedsbeklagten’, in Lüke, G., Mikami, T. and Prütting, H. (eds.), Festschrift für Akira Ishikawa zum 70. Geburtstag (De Gruyter, 2001), pp. 269–92.Google Scholar

Mayer, Pierre, ‘Le pouvoir des arbitres de régler la procédure’, (1995) 2 Revue de l’arbitrage, 163–84.Google Scholar

McKendrick, Ewan., ‘Harmonisation of European Contract Law: The State We Are in’, in Vogenauer, Stefan and Weatherill, Stephen (eds.), The Harmonisation of European Contract Law (Hart Publishing, 2006) pp. 5–29.Google Scholar

Mehren, Arthur Taylor, ‘Adjudicatory Jurisdiction: General Theories Compared and Evaluated’ (1983) 63 Boston University Law Review, 279–340.Google Scholar

Menyhárd, Attila, ‘The East European Tradition: Application of Boilerplate Clauses under Hungarian Law’, in Cordero-Moss, Giuditta (ed.), Boilerplate Clauses, International Commercial Contracts and the Applicable Law (Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 302–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Merkin, Robert, Arbitration Law (Laforma Law, 2004).Google Scholar

Mikelsen, Anders, Hindringsfritak (Gyldendal, 2011)Google Scholar

Mustill, M. J., ‘The New Lex Mercatoria: the First Twenty-Five Years’ (1988) 4 Arbitration International, 86–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Møgelvang-Hansen, Peter, ‘The Nordic Tradition: Application of Boilerplate Clauses under Danish Law’, in Cordero-Moss, Giuditta (ed.), Boilerplate Clauses, International Commercial Contracts and the Applicable law (Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 233–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Möller, Gustaf, ‘The Nordic Tradition: Application of Boilerplate Clauses under Finnish Law’, in Cordero-Moss, Giuditta (ed.), Boilerplate Clauses, International Commercial Contracts and the Applicable Law (Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 254–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neuhold, Hanspeter, Hummer, Waldemar and Schreuer, Christoph, Österreichisches Handbuch des Völkerrechts, 4th edn (Manz, 2004).Google Scholar

Nielsen, P. A., International privat- og procesret, (Jurist- og Økonomiforbundets Forlag, 1997).Google Scholar

Nygh, Peter and Pocar, Fausto, Report on the Preliminary Draft Convention on Jurisdiction and Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, Preliminary Document No 11 of August 2000 (Hague Conference on Private International Law, 2000), .Google Scholar

Paulsson, Jan, ‘Arbitration Unbound: Award Detached from the Law of its Country of Origin’ (1981) 30 International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 357–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paulsson, Jan, ‘Arbitration Without Privity’ (1995) 10 ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal, 232–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paulsson, Jan, ‘Delocalization of International Commercial Arbitration: When and Why it Matters’ (1983) 32(1) International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 53–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peel, Edwin, ‘The Common Law Tradition: Application of Boilerplate Clauses under English Law’, in Cordero-Moss, Giuditta (ed.), Boilerplate Clauses, International Commercial Contracts and the Applicable Law, (Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 129–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peel, Edwin, Treitel on The Law of Contract 13th edn (Sweet & Maxwell, 2011).Google Scholar

Philip, Alan, First Danish Decisions on the Rome Convention (IPRax, 1994).Google Scholar

Port, Nicola Christine., Bowers, Scott Ethan and Noll, Bethany Davis, ‘Article V(1)(c)’, in Kronke, Herbert and Nacimiento, Patricia (eds.), Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards: A Global Commentary on the New York Convention (Kluwer Law International, 2010), pp. 257–80.Google Scholar

Pålsson, Lennart, Romkonventionen. Tillämplig lag för avtalsförpliktelser (Norstedts Juridik, 1998),Google Scholar

Queen Mary University of London School of International Arbitration, International Arbitration Survey: Choices in International Arbitration (2010), .

Radicati di Brozolo, Luca ‘Arbitration and Competition Law: The Position of the Courts and of Arbitrators’ (2011) 27(1) Arbitration International1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Redfern, Alan, Hunter, Martin, Blackaby, Nigel and Partasides, Constantine, Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration (Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Reese, W. ‘Dépecage: a Common Phenomenon in Choice of Law’ (1973) 73 Columbia Law Review 1, 58–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Research Group on the Existing EC Private Law (Acquis group), ‘Principles of the Existing EC Contract Law (Acquis Principles) – Contract II: General Provisions, Delivery of Goods, Package Travel and Payment Services’ (Sellier European Law Publishers, 2009).Google Scholar

Reymond, Claude, ‘Civil Law and Common Law Procedures: Which is the More Inquisitorial? A Civil Lawyer’s Response’ (1989) 5(4) Arbitration International, 357–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rogers, Catherine A., ‘The International Arbitrator Information Project: An Idea Whose Time Has Come’, in Alford, Roger (ed.) Kluwer Arbitration Blog (Wolters Kluwer, 2012), .Google Scholar

Rubins, Noah, ‘Final Arbitral Award Rendered in 2000 in UNCITRAL Ad Hoc Arbitration SwemBalt AB v. Republic of Latvia – Observations’ (2004) 2 Stockholm Arbitration Report, 119–27.Google Scholar

Rubins, Noah et al., ‘Judgment by the Svea Court of Appeal, rendered in 2003 in case T8735–01, The Czech Republic v. CME Czech Republic B.V. – The CME v. Czech Republic case – Observations’ (2003) 2 Stockholm Arbitration Report, .Google Scholar

Savigny, Friedrich Carl, System des heutigen römischen Rechts, 8 vols. (Veit und Comp, 1849).Google Scholar

Schlechtriem, Peter, Good Faith in German Law and in International Uniform Laws (Rome: Pace Law School Institute of International Commercial Law, 1997).Google Scholar

Schlechtriem, Peter, ‘The Functions of General Clauses, Exemplified by Regarding Germanic Laws and Dutch Law’, in Grundmann, Stefan and Mazeaud, Denis (eds.) General Clauses and Standards in European Contract Law (Aspen Publishers, 2006), pp. 41–55.Google Scholar

Schneider, Michael, ‘Combining Arbitration with Conciliation’ (2003), 1(2) Oil, Gas & Enegy Law Intelligence, Article 55.Google Scholar

School of International Arbitration, Queen Mary, University of London, International Arbitration Survey: Choices in International Arbitration, .

School of International Arbitration, Queen Mary, University of London, International Arbitration Survey: Current and Preferred Practices in the Arbitral Process (2012), .

Schreuer, Christoph, ‘Failure to Apply the Governing Law in International Investment Arbitration’ (2002) 7 Austrian Review of International and European Law147–96, .Google Scholar

Schreuer, Christoph, ‘Investment Treaty Arbitration and Jurisdiction over Contract Claims – the Vivendi I Case Considered’, in Weiler, T. (ed.), Leading Cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, Bilateral Treaties and Customary International Law (Cameron May, 2005), pp. 281–323.Google Scholar

Schreuer, Christoph, ‘Three Generations of ICSID Annulment Proceedings’, in Gaillard, E. and Banifatemi, Y. (eds.), Annulment of ICSID Awards (Juris Publishing, 2004), pp. 17–42.Google Scholar

Schreuer, Christoph, Malintoppi, Loretta, Reinisch, August and Sinclair, Antony, The ICSID Convention: A commentary, 2nd edn (Cambridge University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwenzer, I., Schlechtriem & Schwenzer Commentary on the UN Convention on the International Sale of Goods (CISG), 3rd edn (Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Schwenzer, I., Hachem, P. and Kee, C., Global Sales and Contract Law (Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Scoles, Eugene, Hay, Peter, Borchers, Patrick and Symeonides, Simeon, Conflict of Laws, 4th edn (Thomson West, 2004).Google Scholar

Sheppard, Audly, ‘Public Policy and the Enforcement of Arbitral Awards’ (2004) 1(1) Transnational Dispute Management, .Google Scholar

Siehr, Kurt, ‘Ausländische Eingriffsnormen im inländischen Wirschaftskollisionsrecht’ (1988) 52 Rabels Zeitschrift für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht, 41–102.Google Scholar

Siehr, Kurt (ed.), Intercontinental Cooperation through Private International Law – Essays in Memory of Peter Nygh (Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Siehr, Kurt (ed.), Internationales Privatrechts (Mueller C. F., 2001).Google Scholar

Sonnenberger, H. J., ‘Treu und Glauben – ein supranationaler Grundsatz?’, Festschrift für Walter Odersky (De Gruyter, 1996), pp. 703–21.Google Scholar

Spagnolo, Lisa, ‘Green Eggs and Ham: The CISG, Path Dependence, and the Behavioural Economics of Lawyer’s Choice of Law in International Sales Contracts’ (2010) 6(2) Journal of Private International Law, 417–64, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Special Commission on Choice of Law in International Contracts, ‘Draft Hague Principles on the Choice of Law in International Contracts’ (Hague Conference on Private International Law, 2012) .Google Scholar

Staudinger, J., Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch mit Einführungsgesetz und Nebengesetzen (De Gruyter, 2009).Google Scholar

Staudinger, J., Book 2: Einleitung zum Schuldrecht, Treu und Glauben (De Gruyter, 2005)Google Scholar

Staudinger, J., Book 2: Vertragsschluss (De Gruyter, 2005)Google Scholar

Sternlight, Jean R., ‘Panacea or Corporate Tool? Debunking the Supreme Court’s Preference for Binding Arbitration’ (1996) 74(3) Washington University Law Quarterly, 637–712.Google Scholar

Study Group on a European Civil Code and Research Group on EC Private Law (Acquis Group), Principles, Definitions and Model Rules of European Private Law – Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR) (Sellier European Law Publishers, 2009) .Google Scholar

Symeonides, Simeon, ‘Material Justice and Conflicts of Justice in Choice of Law’, in Borchers, P. and Zekoll, J. (eds.), International Conflict of Laws For the Third Millenium: Essays in Honor of Friedrich K. Juenger (Transnational Publishers, 2001), pp.125–40.Google Scholar

Symeonides, Simeon, ‘Party Autonomy and Private-Law Making: The Lex Mercatoria that Isn’t’ (19 November 2006), .

Thue, Helge Johan, Internasjonal privatrett (Gyldendal Academic, 2002).Google Scholar

Twigg-Flesner, Christian, ‘Standard Terms in International Commercial Law – The Example of Documentary Credits’, in Schulze, Reiner (ed.), New Features in Contract Law (Sellier European Law Publishers, 2007), pp. 325–39.Google Scholar

UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts, 3rd edn (2010), .

United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), ‘Commentary on the Draft Convention on Contracts for the International Sales of Goods, prepared by the Secretariat A/CONF.97/5’ (1979), .

United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), ‘UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration – Explanatory Note’ (2006), .

United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), ‘Recommendation Regarding the Interpretation of Article II Paragraph 2, and Article VII, Paragraph 1, of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards’ (1956), .

United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), ‘Report of the Working Group on Arbitration on the Work of its Thirty-second Session’ (2000), A/CN.9/468, .

United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), ‘Report of Working Group II (Arbitration and Conciliation) on the Work of its Forty-sixth Session’ (2007), A/CN.9/619, .

United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), ‘Report of Working Group II (Arbitration and Conciliation) on the Work of its Forty-ninth Session’ (2008), A/CN.9/665, .

United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), ‘Settlement of Commercial Disputes – Preparation of Uniform Provisions on Written Form for Arbitration Agreements – Article 2 of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards’ (1958), A/CN.9/WGII/WP.139, .

Vettese, Maria Celeste, ‘Multinational Companies and National Contracts’, in Cordero-Moss, Giuditta (ed.), Boilerplate Clauses, International Commercial Contracts and the Applicable Law, (Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 20–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vogenauer, Stefan, ‘Regulatory Competition Through Choice of Contract Law and Choice of Forum in Europe: Theory and Evidence’ (2013) 21(1) European Review of Private Law13–78.Google Scholar

Wallin, Martin, ‘Judgment by the Svea Court of Appeal rendered in 2000 in case 8090–99 – Observations’ (2003) 1 Stockholm Arbitration Report, 251.Google Scholar

Weise, P. F., Lex Mercatoria (Peter Lang, 1990).Google Scholar

Wetter, G. J., ‘The Conduct of the Arbitration’ (1985) 2(2) Journal of International Arbitration, 7–38.Google Scholar

Whish, Richard, Competition Law, 5th edn (Lexis Nexis, 2003).Google Scholar

Whittaker, Simon, ‘On the Development of European Standard Contract Terms’ (2006) 1 European Review of Contract Law, 51–76.Google Scholar

Whittaker, Simon, ‘Theory and Practice of the “General Clause” in English Law: General Norms and the Structuring of Judicial Discretion’, in Grundmann, Stefan and Mazeaud, Denis (eds.), General Clauses and Standards in European Contract Law (Kluwer International, 2006), pp. 57–76.Google Scholar

Wiegand, W., ‘Iura Novit Curia v. Ne Ultra Petita – Die Anfechtbarkeit von Schiedsgerichtsurteilen im Lichte der Jüngsten Rechtsprechung des Bundesgerichts’, in Greiner, Monique Jametti, Berger, Bernhard and Güngerich, Andreas (eds.), Rechtsetzung und Rechtsdurchsetzung. Festschrift für Franz Kellerhals (Stämpfli Verlag, 2005), pp. 127–44.Google Scholar

Wilhelmson, T., ‘International Lex Mercatoria and Local Consumer Law: An Impossible Combination?’ (2004) 3 Revue européenne de droit de la consummation, 141–53.Google Scholar

Windmöller, Martin, Die Vertragsspaltung im internationalen Privatrecht des EGBGB und des EGVVG (Nomos, 2000).Google Scholar

Yala, Farouk, ‘Final Arbitral Award rendered in 2000 in UNCITRAL Ad Hoc Arbitration SwemBalt AB v. Republic of Latvia – Observations’ (2004) 2 Stockholm Arbitration Report, 128–41.Google Scholar

Zimmermann, Reinhard, The Law of Obligations: Roman Foundations of the Civilian Tradition (Oxford University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zimmermann, Reinhard and Whittaker, Simon (eds.), Good Faith in European Contract Law (Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Zweigert, Konrad and Kötz, Hein, Einführung in die Rechtsvergleichung (Mohr Siebeck, 1996).Google Scholar

Zykin, Ivan S., ‘The East European Tradition: Application of Boilerplate Clauses under Russian law’, in Cordero-Moss, Giuditta (ed.), Boilerplate Clauses, International Commercial Contracts and the Applicable Law (Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 329–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar