The Cost of Success

On June 13, 2005, the US Senate apologized for filibustering antilynching legislation from the early twentieth century that would have made lynching a federal crime. In essence, the government apologized for failing one of its most basic functions: protecting its citizens from harm. This apology acknowledged that victims of lynch mobs, largely southern African Americans killed by whites, did not receive appropriate protection of law officials to prevent or punish their deaths. This apology was long overdue and reflects a popular consensus, perhaps prompted by scholarship, that lynching is unjust.

Had this apology been issued one hundred years ago, however, it might have been different. It might have included an apology for the government's failure to protect African American women from white sexual assault. Activists in the earliest phase of the antilynching movement, the two decades at the turn of the century, had what we today would call an intersectional understanding. Lynch critics considered the mob killings of black men and the sexual assaults on black women to be complementary problems with similar root causes and faulted the criminal justice system for failing to prevent or punish either crime.