Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T06:47:55.768Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 July 2017

Wei Zhuang
Affiliation:
University of Geneva
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Intellectual Property Rights and Climate Change
Interpreting the TRIPS Agreement for Environmentally Sound Technologies
, pp. 373 - 410
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Australian Productivity Commission (2013). Compulsory Licensing of Patents, Inquiry Report No. 61, Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
Copenhagen Economics (2009). Are IPR a Barrier to the Transfer of Climate Change Technology? Copenhagen Economics A/S and the IPR Company ApS.Google Scholar
Economics and Statistics Administration and United States Patent and Trademark Office (2012). Intellectual Property and the U.S. Economy: Industries in Focus, Washington, D.C.: US Department of Commerce.Google Scholar
International Council on Human Rights Policy (2011). Beyond Technology Transfer: Protecting Human Rights in a Climate-Constrained World, Geneva: International Council on Human Rights Policy.Google Scholar
IPCC (2000). IPCC Special Report: Methodological and Technological Issues in Technology Transfer. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
IPCC (2007a). Synthesis Report, Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC, Core Writing Team. Pachauri, R. K. and Reisinger, A. (eds.). Geneva, Switzerland: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.Google Scholar
IPCC (2007b). Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis: Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC. Solomon, S. D. et al. (eds.). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
IPCC (2007c). Mitigation, Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC. Metz, B., Davidson, O. R., Bosch, P. R., Dave, R., and Meyer, L. A. (eds.). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
IPCC (2012). Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation: Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
IPCC (2014a). Climate Change 2014 Synthesis Report: Summary for Policymakers, available at www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/syr/SYR_AR5_SPM_Final.pdfGoogle Scholar
IPCC (2014b). Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change, Working Group III Contribution to the IPCC 5th Assessment Report, Chapter 13: International Cooperation: Agreements and Instruments.Google Scholar
IPCC (2014c). Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change, Working Group III Contribution to the IPCC 5th Assessment Report, Chapter 15: National and Sub-National Policies and Institutions.Google Scholar
Lee, B., Iliev, L., and Preston, F. (2009). Who Owns Our Low Carbon Future?, Intellectual Property and Energy Technologies, A Chatham House Report.Google Scholar
Ockwell, David (2008). Intellectual Property Rights and Low Carbon Technology Transfer to Developing Countries – A Review of the Evidence to Date, UK-India Collaboration to Overcome Barriers to the Transfer of Low Carbon Energy Technology: Phase 2, University of Sussex, Energy and Resources Institute and Institute of Development Studies.Google Scholar
Ockwell, David, Watson, Jim, Mackerron, Gordon, Pal, Prosanto, Yamin, Farhana, Vasudevan, N. and Mohanty, Parimita, (2007). UK-India Collaboration to Identify the Barriers to the Transfer of Low Carbon Energy Technology, Final Report, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.Google Scholar
OECD (2002). Foreign Direct Investment for Development: Maximising Benefits, Minimising Costs. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Publishing.Google Scholar
Pugatch, Meir Perez (2011). Intellectual Property and the Transfer of Environmentally Sound Technologies, Global Challenges Report. Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization.Google Scholar
Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future (1987, March 20). Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to Document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.Google Scholar
The Energy and Resources Institute (2009). Emerging Asia Contribution on Issues of Technology for Copenhagen, TERI Report No. 2008 RS09. New Delhi.Google Scholar
The UK Commission on Intellectual Property Rights (2002). Integrating Intellectual Property Rights and Development Policy, Report of the Commission on Intellectual Property Rights. London.Google Scholar
Thomas, John R. (2010). The Role of Trade Secrets in Innovation Policy, Congressional Research Service (CRS) Report for Congress, Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress.Google Scholar
UNCTAD (1974a). The Role of the Patent System in the Transfer of Technology to Developing Countries, UN Doc. TD/B/AC.11/19.Google Scholar
UNCTAD (1974b). The Possibility and Feasibility of an International Code of Conduct on Transfer of Technology, UN Doc. TD/B/AC.11/22.Google Scholar
UNCTAD (1996). The TRIPS Agreement and Developing Countries, UNCTAD/ITE/1. New York and Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar
UNCTAD (2001). Transfer of Technology, UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements. New York and Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar
UNCTAD (2007). The Least Developed Countries Report 2007: Knowledge, Technological Learning and Innovation for Development, prepared by the UNCTAD Secretariat. New York and Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar
UNCTAD (2010). Intellectual Property in the World Trade Organisation: Turning It into Developing Countries’ Real Property. New York and Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar
UNCTAD (2011). Using Intellectual Property Rights to Stimulate Pharmaceutical Production in Developing Countries: A Preference Guide. New York and Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar
UNCTAD (2014). Transfer of Technology and Knowledge Sharing for Development: Science, Technology and Innovation Issues for Developing Countries, UNCTAD/DTL/STICT/2013/8. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar
UNCTC (1987). Transnational Corporations and Technology Transfer: Effects and Policy Issues, ST/CTC/86. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
UNEP, EPO and ICTSD (2010). Patents and Clean Energy: Bridging the Gap between Evidence and Policy. Munich: Mediengruppe Universal.Google Scholar
UNFCCC (2014). Report of the Green Climate Fund to the Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, UN Doc. FCCC/CP/2014/8, Annex.Google Scholar
UNGA (2014). The Road to Dignity by 2030: Ending Poverty, Transforming All Lives and Protecting the Planet, Synthesis Report of the Secretary-General on the Post-2015 Sustainable Development Agenda, A/69/700.Google Scholar
UNIDO (2008). Public Goods for Economic Development. Vienna: United Nations Industrial Development Organisation.Google Scholar
United Nations (1981). Proceedings of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Fifth Session, Manila, 7 May–3 June 1979, Vol. III, New York.Google Scholar
United States International Trade Commission (1988). Foreign Protection of Intellectual Property Rights and the Effect on U.S. Industry and Trade, Report to the United States Trade Representative, Investigation No. 332–245, Under Section 332 (g) of the Tariff Act of 1930, USITC Publication 2065, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
WHO (2006). Public Health: Innovation and Intellectual Property Rights, Report of the Commission on Intellectual Property Rights, Innovation and Public Health, Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
WHO, WIPO and WTO (2012). Promoting Access to Medical Technologies and Innovation: Intersections between Public Health, Intellectual Property and Trade. Geneva: WHO, WIPO and WTO.Google Scholar
WHO, WIPO and WTO (2013). Promoting Access to Medical Technologies and Innovation: Intersections between Public Health, Intellectual Property and Trade. Geneva: WHO, WIPO and WTO.Google Scholar
WIPO (1979, 25 June). Diplomatic Conference on the Revision of the Paris Convention: Basic Proposals, PR/DC/3, Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization.Google Scholar
WIPO (1979). WIPO Model Law for Developing Countries on Inventions, Vol. I: Patents, Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization.Google Scholar
WIPO (2011). Patent Landscape Report on Ritonavir, Patent Landscape Reports Project prepared by Landon IP, Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization.Google Scholar
World Bank (2002). Global Economic Prospects and Developing Countries: Making Trade Work for the World’s Poor, Washington, D.C.: World Bank.Google Scholar
World Bank (2008). Global Economic Prospects: Technology Diffusion in the Developing World, Washington, D.C.: World Bank.Google Scholar
World Economic Forum (2013, December). The Global Energy Architecture Performance Index Report 2014, World Economic Forum and Accenture.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Anderman, Steven (2007). The Interface between Intellectual Property Rights and Competition Policy, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Andersen, Birgitte (2006). Intellectual Property Rights: Innovation, Governance and the Institutional Environment, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Aust, Anthony (2007). Modern Treaty Law and Practice, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barro, Robert J. and Sala-i-Martin, Xavier (2004). Economic Growth, 2nd edn, Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Bessen, James and Meurer, Michael J. (2008). Patent Failure: How Judges, Bureaucrats, and Lawyers Put Innovators at Risk, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bjorge, Eirik (2014). The Evolutionary Interpretation of Treaties, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blakeney, Michael (2012). Intellectual Property Enforcement: A Commentary on the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA), Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodenhausen, G.H.C. (1969). Guide to the Application of the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property (as revised at Stockholm in 1967). United International Bureaux for the Protection of Intellectual Property.Google Scholar
Bradford, Scott C. and Lawrence, Robert Z. (2004). Has Globalization Gone Far Enough?: The Costs of Fragmented Markets, Washington, D.C.: Peterson Institute.Google Scholar
Brownlie, Ian (2008). Principles of Public International Law, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carlarne, Cinnamon Piñon (2010). Climate Change Law and Policy: EU and US Approaches, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cassese, Antonio (2001). International Law, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chang, Ha-Joon (2003). Kicking Away the Ladder: Development Strategy in Historical Perspective, London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
Chang, Ha-Joon (2008). Bad Samaritans: The Guilty Secrets of Rich Nations and the Threat to Global Prosperity, New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Cheng, Bin (1953). General Principles of Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals, London: Stevens and Sons.Google Scholar
Correa, Carlos M. (2000). Intellectual Property Rights, the WTO and Developing Countries: The TRIPS Agreement and Policy Options, London and New York: Zed Books, Third World Network.Google Scholar
Correa, Carlos M. (2007). Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights: A Commentary on the TRIPS Agreement, Oxford Commentaries on International Law, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottier, Thomas and Véron, Pierre (2011). Concise International and European IP Law: TRIPS, Paris Convention, European Enforcement and Transfer of Technology, 2nd edn, New York: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Davies, Gillian (2002). Copyright and the Public Interest, 2nd edn, London: Sweet & Maxwell.Google Scholar
de Carvalho, Nuno Pires (2010). The TRIPS Regime of Patent Rights, 3rd edn, New York: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
de Carvalho, Nuno Pires (2011). The TRIPS Regime of Trademarks and Designs, New York: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Deere, Carolyn (2009). The Implementation Game: The TRIPS Agreement and the Global Politics of Intellectual Property Reform in Developing Countries, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dinwoodie, Graeme B. and Dreyfuss, Rochelle C. (2012). A Neofederalist Vision of TRIPS: The Resilience of the International Intellectual Property Regime, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dörr, Oliver and Schmalenbach, Kirsten (2012). Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary, Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Drahos, Peter and Braithwaite, John (2002). Information Feudalism: Who Owns the Knowledge Economy? Abingdon-on-Thames, UK: Earthscan Publications.Google Scholar
Dratler, Jay (1991). Intellectual Property Law: Commercial, Creative, and Industrial Property, New York: Law Journal Press.Google Scholar
Dratler, Jay and McJohn, Stephen M. (2004). Intellectual Property Law: Commercial, Creative, and Industrial Property, Vol. I, New York: Law Journal Press.Google Scholar
Dratler, Jay and McJohn, Stephen M. (2006). Intellectual Property Law: Commercial, Creative, and Industrial Property, New York: Law Journal Press.Google Scholar
Dreyfuss, Rochelle Cooper and Kwall, Roberta Rosenthal (1996). Intellectual Property: Trademark, Copyright, and Patent Law: Cases and Materials, Eagan, MN: West Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Dutfield, Graham (2000). Intellectual Property Rights, Trade, and Biodiversity: Seeds and Plant Varieties, Abingdon-on-Thames, UK: Earthscan Publications.Google Scholar
Engelen, Frank (2004). Interpretation of Tax Treaties under International Law, IBFD Publications BV.Google Scholar
Fikentscher, Wolfgang (1980). The Draft International Code of Conduct on the Transfer of Technology: A Study in Third World Development, Munich: Max Planck Institute for Foreign and International Patent, Copyright, and Competition Law,.Google Scholar
Foltea, Marina (2012). International Organisations in WTO Dispute Settlement: How Much Institutional Sensitivity? Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
French, Duncan (2005). International Law and Policy of Sustainable Development, Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Gardiner, Richard K. (2008). Treaty Interpretation, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gervais, Daniel (2012). The TRIPS Agreement: Drafting History and Analysis, 4th edn, London: Sweet & Maxwell.Google Scholar
Ghidini, Gustavo (2010). Innovation, Competition and Consumer Welfare in Intellectual Property Law, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing .Google Scholar
Gollin, Micheal A. (2008). Driving Innovation: Intellectual Property Strategies for a Dynamic World, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, Jeffrey L. (2003). Law and Economics in a Nutshell, 3rd edn, Eagan, MN: West Group.Google Scholar
Haugen, Hans Morten (2007). The Right to Food and the TRIPS Agreement: With a Particular Emphasis on Developing Countries’ Measures for Food Production and Distribution, Leiden, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
Hestermeyer, Holger (2007). Human Rights and the WTO: The Case of Patents and Access to Medicines, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ho Cynthia, M. (2011). Access to Medicine in the Global Economy: International Agreements on Patents and Related Rights, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hoekman, Bernard and Javorcik, Beata Smarzynska (2006). Global Integration and Technology Transfer, World Bank, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Honkonen, Tuula (2009). The Common but Differentiated Responsibility Principle in Multilateral Environmental Agreements: Regulatory and Policy Aspects, New York: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Howkins, John (2002). The Creative Economy: How People Make Money from Ideas, London: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
Howse, Robert (2007). The WTO System: Law, Politics & Legitimacy, London: Cameron May.Google Scholar
Jaffe, Adam B. and Lerner, Josh (2004). Innovation and Its Discontents: How Our Broken Patent System Is Endangering Innovation and Progress, and What to Do about It, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Joyner, Daniel H. (2012). Interpreting the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Khor, Martin (2001). Globalisation and the Crisis of Sustainable Development, Penang, Malaysia: Third World Network.Google Scholar
Kim, Linsu (1997). Imitation to Innovation: The Dynamics of Korea’s Technological Learning, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
Kim, Linsu and Nelson, Richard R. (2000). Technology, Learning, and Innovation: Experiences of Newly Industrializing Economies, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kingston, William (2010). Beyond Intellectual Property: Matching Information Protection to Innovation, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Kinsella, Stephan N. (2008). Against Intellectual Property, Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute.Google Scholar
Kuanpoth, Jakkrit (2010). Patent Rights in Pharmaceuticals in Developing Countries: Major Challenges for the Future, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Li, Yuwen (1994). Transfer of Technology for Deep Sea-bed Mining: The 1982 Law of the Sea Convention and Beyond, Berlin, Germany: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Linderfalk, Ulf (2007). On the Interpretation of Treaties: The Modern International Law as Expressed in the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Houten: Springer Netherlands.Google Scholar
Luo, Yan (2010). Anti-dumping in the WTO, the EU and China: The Rise of Legalization in the Trade Regime and Its Consequences, Vol. LXIX, New York: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Maggiolino, Mariateresa (2011). Intellectual Property and Antitrust: A Comparative Economic Analysis of US and EU Law, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Malbon, Justin, Lawson, Charles and Davison, Mark (2014). The WTO Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights: A Commentary, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Maskus, Keith E. (2000). Intellectual Property Rights in the Global Economy, Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Matsushita, Mitsuo, Schoenbaum, Thomas J. and Mavroidis, Petros C. (2006). The World Trade Organisation: Law, Practice, and Policy, 2nd edn, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
May, Christopher (2007). The World Intellectual Property Organisation: Resurgence and the Development Agenda, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
McCarthy, Thomas J. (1995). McCarthy’s Desk Encyclopaedia of Intellectual Property, Washington, D.C.: Bureau of National Affairs.Google Scholar
McNair, Arnold Duncan (1961). The Law of Treaties, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Merrill, Stephen A., Levin, Richard C. and Meyers, Mark B. (2004). A Patent System for the 21st Century, Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Miller, John C., Serrato, Ruben M., Represas-Cardenas, Jose Miguel and Kundahl, Griffith A. (2005). The Handbook of Nanotechnology: Business, Policy and Intellectual Property Law, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Monti, Giorgio (2007). EC Competition Law: Law in Context, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moon, Suerie and Hein, Wolfgang (2013). Informal Norms in Global Governance: Human Rights, Intellectual Property Rules and Access to Medicines, Farnham, UK: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
Muchlinski, Peter (2007). Multinational Enterprises and the Law, 2nd edn, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Munro, Joseph Edwin Crawford (1884). The Patents, Designs, and Trade Marks Act, 1883, Section 22, London: Stevens and Sons.Google Scholar
Nguyãẽn, Tú Thanh (2010). Competition Law, Technology Transfer and the TRIPS Agreement: Implications for Developing Countries, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Ockwell, David and Mallett, Alexandra (2012). Low-Carbon Technology Transfer: From Rhetoric to Reality, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
OECD (1989). Competition Policy and Intellectual Property Rights, Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Publishing.Google Scholar
OECD (1997). Patents and Innovation in the International Context, OCDE/GD (97) 210, Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Publishing.Google Scholar
O’Connell, Donal (2011). Harvesting External Innovation: Managing External Relationships and Intellectual Property, London: Gower Publishing.Google Scholar
O’Keefe, Roger and Tams, Christian J. (2013). The United Nations Convention on Jurisdictional Immunities of States and Their Property: A Commentary, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Aidan (2011). EU Law for UK Lawyers, Oxford, UK: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Orakhelashvili, Alexander (2008). The Interpretation of Acts and Rules in Public International Law, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Papadopoulos, Anestis S. (2010). The International Dimension of EU Competition Law and Policy, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Park, Jae Hun (2010). Patents and Industry Standards, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Patel, Surendra J., Roffe, Pedro and Yusuf, Abdulqawi A. (2001). International Technology Transfer: The Origins and Aftermath of the United Nations Negotiations on a Draft Code of Conduct, New York: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost (2008). Conflict of Norms in Public International Law: How WTO Law Relates to Other Rules of International Law, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Penrose, Edith Tilton (1951). The Economics of the International Patent System, Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Pugatch, Meir Perez (2006). The Intellectual Property Debate: Perspectives from Law, Economics and Political Economy, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Qureshi, Asif H.(2012). Interpreting WTO Agreements: Problems and Perspectives, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Radhakrishnan, R. and Balasubramanian, S. (2008). Intellectual Property Rights: Text and Cases, New Delhi: Anurag Jain for Excel Books.Google Scholar
Ramanathan, Kavasseri, Jacobs, Keith and Bandyopadhyay, Madhusudan (2011). Technology Transfer and Small and Medium Enterprises in Developing Countries, New Delhi: Daya Publishing House.Google Scholar
Reinsdorf, Marshall and Slaughter, Matthew J. (2009). International Trade in Services and Intangibles in the Era of Globalization, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rimmer, Matthew (2011). Intellectual Property and Climate Change: Inventing Clean Technologies, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodger, Barry J. and MacCulloch, Angus (2015). Competition Law and Policy in the EU and UK, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, Edson Beas (2012). The General Exception Clauses of the TRIPS Agreement: Promoting Sustainable Development, Vol. XVII, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ros, Jaime (2013). Rethinking Economic Development, Growth, and Institutions, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sampson, Gary P. (2005). The WTO and Sustainable Development, Tokyo: UNU Press.Google Scholar
Sands, Philippe and Peel, Jacqueline (2012). Principles of International Environmental Law, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Hedvig (2009). Competition Law, Innovation and Antitrust: An Analysis of Tying and Technological Integration, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Schwarzenberger, Georg (1965). The Inductive Approach to International Law, University of Michigan Library.Google Scholar
Sell, Susan K. (1998). Power and Ideas: North-South Politics of Intellectual Property and Antitrust, State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Senftleben, Martin (2004). Copyright, Limitations, and the Three-step Test: An Analysis of the Three-Step Test in International and EC Copyright Law, New York: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Sinclair, Ian McTaggart (1984). The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Stern, Nicholas (2007). The Economics of Climate Change – The Stern Review, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stoll, Peter-Tobias, Busche, Jan and Arend, Katrin (2009). WTO: Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, Vol. VII, Leiden, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
Štrba, Susan Isiko (2012). International Copyright Law and Access to Education in Developing Countries: Exploring Multilateral Legal and Quasi-Legal Solutions, Leiden, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
Taubman, Antony (2011). A Practical Guide to Working with TRIPS, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Taubman, Antony, Wager, Hannu and Watal, Jayashree (2012). A Handbook on the WTO TRIPS Agreement, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trebilcock, Michael, Howse, Robert and Eliason, Antonia (2013). The Regulation of International Trade, 4th edn, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
UNCTAD (2010). Intellectual Property in the World Trade Organisation: Turning It into Developing Countries’ Real Property, United Nations, New York and Geneva.Google Scholar
UNCTAD and ICTSD (2005). Resource Book on TRIPS and Development, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
UNDP (2001). Human Development Report 2001: Making New Technologies Work for Human Development, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
UNDP (2003). Making Global Trade Work for People, Abingdon-on-Thames, UK: Earthscan Publications.Google Scholar
UNIDO (2008). Public Goods for Economic Development, Vienna: United Nations Industrial Development Organization.Google Scholar
Van Damme, Isabelle (2009). Treaty Interpretation by the WTO Appellate Body, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
van den Berg, Hendrik and Lewer, Joshua J. (2007). International Trade and Economic Growth, Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
van den Bossche, Peter and Zdouc, Werner (2013). The Law and Policy of the World Trade Organisation, 3rd edn, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Villiger, Mark Eugen (2009). Commentary on the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Leiden, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
Voigt, Christina (2009). Sustainable Development as a Principle of International Law: Resolving Conflicts between Climate Measures and WTO Law, Leiden, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
Waincymer, Jeff (2002). WTO Litigation: Procedural Aspects of Formal Dispute Settlement, London: Cameron May.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, Mitchel B., Mogee, Mary Ellen and Schoen, Roberta A. (1993). Global Dimensions of Intellectual Property Rights in Science and Technology, Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Watal, Jayashree (2001). Intellectual Property Rights in the WTO and Developing Countries, New York: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Weeramantry, J. Romesh (2012). Treaty Interpretation in Investment Arbitration, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weiler, Todd (2013). The Interpretation of International Investment Law: Equality, Discrimination and Minimum Standards of Treatment in Historical Context, Leiden, Netherlands: Koninklijke Brill NV.Google Scholar
WIPO (1997). Introduction to Intellectual Property: Theory and Practice, New York: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
WIPO (2004). WIPO Intellectual Property Handbook, Publication No. 489(E), 2nd edn, Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization. reprinted 2008.Google Scholar
WIPO (2007). WIPO Patent Drafting Manual, Publication No. 867(E), Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization.Google Scholar
WIPO (2009). WIPO Guide to Using Patent Information, Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization.Google Scholar
Witt, Anne C. (2016). The More Economic Approach to EU Antitrust Law, Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Wolfrum, Rudiger and Matz, Nele (2003). Conflicts in International Environmental Law, Vol. CLXIV, Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag .Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (2008). Understanding the WTO, Geneva, Switzerland: World Trade Organisation.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (2012). WTO Analytical Index: Guide to WTO Law and Practice, 3rd edn, Vol. I, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Xiong, Ping (2012). An International Law Perspective on the Protection of Human Rights in the TRIPS Agreement: An Interpretation of the TRIPS Agreement in Relation to the Right to Health, Leiden, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
Yamane, Hiroko (2011). Interpreting TRIPS: Globalisation of Intellectual Property and Access to Medicines, Oxford, UK: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Yamin, Farhana and Depledge, Joanna (2004). The International Climate Change Regime: A Guide to Rules, Institutions and Procedures, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Yasseen, Mustafa Kamil (1976). L’interprétation des Traités d’après la Convention de Vienne sur le Droit des Traités, Leiden, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
Zemer, Lior (2007). The Idea of Authorship in Copyright, Farnham, UK: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Andreas (2011). The 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees and Its 1967 Protocol: A Commentary, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zuniga, P., Guellec, D., Dernis, H., Khan, M., Okazaki, T., and Webb, C. (2009). OECD Patent Statistics Manual, Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar
Abbott, Frederick M. (2004). WTO Dispute Settlement Practice Relating to the Agreement on Trade-Related Intellectual Property Rights, in Ortino, Federico and Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich (eds.). The WTO Dispute Settlement System 1995–2003, New York: Kluwer Law International, pp. 421–53.Google Scholar
Abbott, Frederick M. (2008). Intellectual Property Rights in World Trade, in Guzman, Andrew T. and Sykes, A. O. (eds.). Research Handbook in International Economic Law, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, pp. 444–84.Google Scholar
Abi-Saab, Georges (2010). The Appellate Body and Treaty Interpretation, in Fitzmaurice, Malgosia, Elias, Olufemi and Merkouris, Panos (eds.). Treaty Interpretation and the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: 30 Years On, Leiden, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, pp. 99109.Google Scholar
Alker, Daniel and Heidhues, Franz (2002). Farmers’ Rights and Intellectual Property Rights – Reconciling Conflicting Concepts, in Evenson, R.E., Santaniello, V. and Zilberman, V. (eds.). Economic and Social Issues in Agricultural Biotechnology, Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing, pp. 6185.Google Scholar
Anderson, Robert D. (2010). Competition Policy and Intellectual Property in the WTO: More Guidance Needed? in Drexl, Josef (ed.). Research Handbook on Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 451–73.Google Scholar
Asrani, Rajesh (2015). Economic Implications of Intellectual Property Rights in Evolving Markets, in Manimala, Mathew J. and Wasdani, Kishinchand Poornima (eds.). Entrepreneurial Ecosystem: Perspectives from Emerging Economies, Delhi: Springer India, pp. 109–31.Google Scholar
Azmi, Ida Madieha bt Abdul GhaniS (2015). Scope and Duration of Compulsory Licensing: Lessons from National Experiences, in Hilty, Reto M. and Liu, Kung-Chung (eds.). Compulsory Licensing: Practical Experiences and Ways Forward, MPI Studies on Intellectual Property and Competition Law 22, Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, pp. 207–20.Google Scholar
Balasegaram, Manica, Childs, Michelle, and Arkinstall, James (2014). The Fight for Global Access to Essential Health Commodities, in Brown, Garrett W., Yamey, Gavin and Wamala, Sarah (eds.). The Handbook of Global Health Policy, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 245–66.Google Scholar
Banasevic, Nicholas and Hellstrom, Per (2010). Windows into the World of Abuse of Dominance: An Analysis of the Commission’s 2004 Microsoft Decision and the CFI’s 2007 Judgment, in Rubini, Luca (ed.). Microsoft on Trial: Legal and Economic Analysis of a Transatlantic Antitrust Case, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Barbosa, Denis Borges (2010). Minimum Standards vs. Harmonization in the TRIPS Context: The Nature of Obligations under TRIPS and Modes of Implementation at the National Level in Monist and Dualist Systems, in Correa, Carlos M. (ed.). Research Handbook on the Protection of Intellectual Property under WTO Rules: Intellectual Property in the WTO, Vol. I, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 52109.Google Scholar
Chung, Rae Kwon (1998). The Role of Government in the Transfer of Environmentally Sound Technology, in Forsyth, Tim (ed.). Positive Measures for Technology Transfer under the Climate Change Convention, London: Royal Institute of International Affairs, pp. 4761.Google Scholar
Correa, Carlos M. (2003). Formulating Effective Pro-Development National Intellectual Property Policies, in Bellmann, Christophe, Dutfield, Graham and Melendez-Ortiz, Ricardo (eds.). Trading in Knowledge: Development Perspectives on TRIPS, Trade and Sustainability, Abingdon-on-Thames, UK: Earthscan Publications, pp. 209–17.Google Scholar
Correa, Carlos M. (2005). Can the TRIPS Agreement Foster Technology Transfer to Developing Countries? in Maskus, Keith E. and Jerome, Reichman (eds.). International Public Goods and Transfer of Technology under a Globalized Intellectual Property Regime, Cambridge University Press, pp. 227–56.Google Scholar
Correa, Carlos M. (2007). The TRIPS Agreement and Developing Countries, in Appleton, Arthur E. and Plummer, Michael G. (eds.). The World Trade Organization: Legal, Economic and Political Analysis, New York: Springer Science + Business Media, pp. 420–55.Google Scholar
Correa, Carlos M. (2008). Patent Rights, in Correa, Carlos M. and Yusuf, Abdulqawi (eds.). Intellectual Property and International Trade: The TRIPS Agreement, New York: Kluwer Law International, pp. 227–57.Google Scholar
Correa, Carlos M. (2014). Intellectual Property and Competition – Room to Legislate under International Law, in Abbott, Frederick et al. (eds.), Using Competition Law to Promote Access to Health Technologies: A Guidebook for Low- and Middle-Income Countries, New York: United Nations Development Programme, pp. 3557.Google Scholar
Correa, Carlos M. (2016). Intellectual Property Rights under the UNFCCC: Without Response to Developing Countries’ Concerns, in Sarnoff, Joshua D. (ed.), Research Handbook on Intellectual Property and Climate Change, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 7491.Google Scholar
Cottier, Thomas and Schefer, Krista Nadakavukaren (2000). Good Faith and the Protection of Legitimate Expectations in the WTO, in Bronckers, Marco and Quick, Reinhard (eds.). New Directions in International Economic Law: Essays in Honour of John H. Jackson, New York: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Dahrendorf, Anke (2010). Global Proliferation of Bilateral and Regional Trade Agreements: A Threat for the World Trade Organisation and/or for Developing Countries? in Hertwig, Jana and Maus, Sylvia (eds.). Global Risks: Constructing World Order Through Law, Politics and Economics, Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Lang GmbH, pp. 3966.Google Scholar
Dinwoodie, Graeme B. and Dreyfuss, Rochelle Cooper (2005). WTO Dispute Resolution and the Preservation of the Public Domain of Science under International Law, in Maskus, Keith E. and Reichman, Jerome (eds.). International Public Goods and Transfer of Technology Under a Globalized Intellectual Property Regime, Cambridge University Press, pp. 861–83.Google Scholar
Drexl, Josef (2005). The Critical Role of Competition Law in Preserving Public Goods in Conflict with Intellectual Property Rights, in Maskus, Keith E. and Reichman, Jerome (eds.). International Public Goods and Transfer of Technology under a Globalized Intellectual Property Regime, Cambridge University Press, pp. 707–25.Google Scholar
Fink, Carsten (2005a). Comment: Competition Law as a Means of Containing Intellectual Property Rights, in Maskus, Keith E. and Reichman, Jerome (eds.). International Public Goods and Transfer of Technology under a Globalized Intellectual Property Regime, Cambridge University Press, pp. 770–3.Google Scholar
Fink, Carsten (2005b). Entering the Jungle of Intellectual Property Rights Exhaustion and Parallel Importation, in Fink, Carsten and Maskus, Keith E. (eds.). Intellectual Property and Development: Lessons from Recent Economic Research, World Bank and Oxford University Press, pp. 171–87.Google Scholar
Fink, Carsten (2013). Intellectual Property Rights: Economic Principles and Trade Rules, in Lukauskas, Arvid, Stern, Robert M. and Zanini, Gianni (eds.). Handbook of Trade Policy for Development, Oxford University Press, pp. 740–67.Google Scholar
Fink, Carsten and Braga, Carlos A. Primo (2005). How Stronger Protection of Intellectual Property Rights Affects International Trade Flows, in Fink, Carsten and Maskus, Keith E. (eds.). Intellectual Property and Development: Lessons from Recent Economic Research, a copublication of the World Bank and Oxford University Press, pp. 1940.Google Scholar
Fink, Carsten and Reichenmiller, Patrick (2006). Tightening TRIPS: Intellectual Property Provisions of US Free Trade Agreements, in Newfarmer, Richard (ed.). Trade, Doha, and Development: A Window into the Issues, Washington, D.C.: World Bank, pp. 289303.Google Scholar
Fisher, William (2001). Theories of Intellectual Property, in Munzer, Stephen R. (ed.). New Essays in the Legal and Political Theory of Property, Cambridge University Press, pp. 168200.Google Scholar
Frankel, Susy (2010). The Applicability of GATT Jurisprudence to the Interpretation of the TRIPS Agreement, in Correa, Carlos (ed.). Research Handbook on the Interpretation and Enforcement of Intellectual Property Under WTO Rules: Intellectual Property in the WTO, Vol. II, pp. 3–23.Google Scholar
Galal, Essam E. (2001). The Developing Countries’ Quest for a Code, in Patel, J. Surendra, Roffe, Pedro and Yusuf, A. Abdulqawi (eds.). International Technology Transfer: The Origins and Aftermath of the United Nations Negotiations on a Draft Code of Conduct, New York: Kluwer Law International, pp. 199215.Google Scholar
Gallego, Beatriz Conde (2010). Intellectual Property Rights and Competition Policy, in Correa, Carlos M. (ed.). Research Handbook on the Protection of Intellectual Property under WTO Rules: Intellectual Property in the WTO, Vol. I, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 226–65.Google Scholar
Ganslandt, Mattias and Maskus, Keith E. (2008). Intellectual Property Rights, Parallel Imports and Strategic Behaviour, in Maskus, Keith E. (ed.). Intellectual Property, Growth and Trade, Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing, pp. 263–88.Google Scholar
Gervais, Daniel J. (2007a). The TRIPS Agreement and the Changing Landscape of International Intellectual Property, in Torremans, Paul, Shan, Hailing and Erauw, Johan (eds.). Intellectual Property and TRIPS Compliance in China: Chinese and European Perspectives, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 6584.Google Scholar
Gervais, Daniel J. (2007b). The TRIPS Agreement and the Doha Round: History and Impact on Economic Development, in Yu, Peter K. (ed.). Intellectual Property and Information Wealth: Issues and Practices in the Digital Age, Vol. IV, pp. 23–72.Google Scholar
Grosse, Ruse-Khan Henning (2011). Assessing the Need for a General Public Interest Exception in the TRIPS Agreement, in Kur, Annette and Levin, Marianne (eds.). Intellectual Property Rights in a Fair World Trade System: Proposal for Reforms of TRIPS, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 167207.Google Scholar
Grotto, Andrew J. (2004). Organizing for Influence: Developing Countries, Non-Traditional Intellectual Property Rights and the World Intellectual Property Organisation, in Von Bogdandy, Armin, Wolfrum, Armin and Philipp, Christiane (eds.). Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, 8(1). Leiden, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, pp. 359–82.Google Scholar
Heinemann, Andreas (1996). Antitrust Law of Intellectual Property in the TRIPS Agreement of the World Trade Organisation, in Beier, Friedrich-Karl and Schricker, Gerhard (eds.). From GATT to TRIPS – The Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, IIC Studies, Munich: Max Planck Institute for Foreign and International Patent, Copyright and Competition Law, pp. 239–47.Google Scholar
Howse, Robert (2003). Comments on the Papers Presented by Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann and William J. Davey/Werner Zdouc, in Cottier, Thomas, Mavroidis, Petros Constantinos and Panizzon, Marion (eds.). Intellectual Property: Trade, Competition and Sustainable Development, World Trade Forum Vol. III, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 95–9.Google Scholar
Howse, Robert L. and Mutua, Makau (2001). Protecting Human Rights in a Global Economy Challenges for the World Trade Organization, in Stokke, Hugo and Tostensen, Anne (eds.). Human Rights in Development Yearbook 1999/2000, New York: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Jager, Melvin F. (2002). The Critical Role of Trade Secret Law in Protecting Intellectual Property Assets, in Goldscheider, Robert (ed.). Licensing Best Practices: The LESI Guide to Strategic Issues and Contemporary Realities, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 127–38.Google Scholar
Janis, Mark D. (2005). “Minimal” Standards for Patent-Related Antitrust Law under TRIPS, in Maskus, Keith E. and Reichman, Jerome (eds.). International Public Goods and Transfer of Technology under a Globalized Intellectual Property Regime, Cambridge University Press, pp. 774–92.Google Scholar
Kong, Qingjiang (2011). China in the WTO: Enforcement of the TRIPS Agreement and the Doha Agenda, in Kariyawasam, Rohan (ed.). Chinese Intellectual Property and Technology Laws, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 348–66.Google Scholar
Korean Trade Promotion Agency (2000). Case Study 4: The Republic of Korea and the Montreal Protocol, in Jha, Veena and Hoffmann, Ulrich (eds.). Achieving Objectives of Multilateral Environmental Agreements: A Package of Trade Measures and Positive Measures, UNCTAD/ITCD/TED/6, pp. 56–70.Google Scholar
Kur, Annette (2011). Limitations and Exceptions under the Three-step-test – How Much Room to Walk the Middle Ground? in Kur, Annette and Levin, Marianne (eds.). Intellectual Property Rights in a Fair World Trade System: Proposal for Reforms of TRIPS, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 208–61.Google Scholar
Laperrouza, Marc (2010). Trade, Technology Transfer and Institutional Catch-up, in Lehmann, Fabrice and Lehmann, Jean-Pierre (eds.). Peace and Prosperity through World Trade, Cambridge University Press, pp. 222–6.Google Scholar
Levin, Marianne (2011). The Pendulum Keeps Swinging – Present Discussions on and around the TRIPS Agreement, in Kur, Annette (ed.). Intellectual Property Rights in a Fair World Trade System: Proposals for Reform of TRIPS, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 360.Google Scholar
Lopez, Andres (2009). Innovation and Appropriability, Empirical Evidence and Research Agenda, in The Economics of Intellectual Property: Suggestions for Further Research in Developing Countries and Countries with Economies in Transition, Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization, pp. 132.Google Scholar
Lowe, Vaughan (1999). Sustainable Development and Unsustainable Arguments, in Boyle, Alan and Freestone, David (eds.). International Law and Sustainable Development: Past Achievements and Future Challenges, Oxford University Press, pp. 1938.Google Scholar
Machado-Filho, Haroldo and Poppe, Marcelo Khaled (2011). Transfer of Technology under the Climate Change Regime, in da Motta, Ronaldo Seroa et al. (eds.). Climate Change in Brazil: Economic, Social and Regulatory Aspects, Brazil: Institute for Applied Economic Research, pp. 329–48.Google Scholar
Maskus, Keith E. (2002). Benefiting from Intellectual Property Protection, in Hoekman, Bernard, Mattoo, Aaditya and English, Philip (eds.). Development, Trade and the WTO: A Handbook, Washington, D.C.: World Bank, pp. 369–81.Google Scholar
Maskus, Keith E. and Reichman, Jerome (2005). The Globalization of Private Knowledge Goods and the Privatization of Global Public Goods, in Maskus, Keith E. and Reichman, Jerome (eds.). International Public Goods and Transfer of Technology Under a Globalized Intellectual Property Regime, Cambridge University Press, pp. 345.Google Scholar
McManis, Charles R. and Contreras, Jorge L. (2014). Compulsory Licensing of Intellectual Property: A Viable Policy Lever for Promoting Access to Critical Technologies, in Ghidini, Gustavo, Peritz, Rudolph J. R. and Ricolfi, Marco (eds.). TRIPS and Developing Countries: Towards a New IP World Order? Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 109–31.Google Scholar
Menell, Peter S. (2000). Intellectual Property: General Theories, in Bouckaert, Boudewijn and De Geest, Gerrit (eds.). Encyclopaedia of Law and Economics, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 129–88.Google Scholar
Nelson, Richard R. (1992). What Is “Commercial” and What Is “Public” About Technology, What Should Be? in Rosenberg, Natham, Landau, Ralph and Mowery, David C. (eds.). Technology and the Wealth of Nations, Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 5771.Google Scholar
Nolte, Georg (2013). Subsequent Agreements and Subsequent Practice of States Outside of Judicial or Quasi-judicial Proceedings, in Nolte, Georg (ed.). Treaties and Subsequent Practice, Oxford University Press, pp. 307–86.Google Scholar
Nyman-Metcalf, Katrin, Pawan, Kumar Dutt and Chochia, Archil (2014). The Freedom to Conduct Business and the Right to Property: The EU Technology Transfer Block Exemption Regulation and the Relationship between Intellectual Property and Competition Law, in Kerikmäe, Tanel (ed.). Protecting Human Rights in the EU: Controversies and Challenges of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, pp. 3770.Google Scholar
Park, Walter G. (2011). Intellectual Property Rights and Foreign Direct Investment: Lessons from Central America, in Lopez, Humberto J. and Shankar, Rashmi (eds.). Getting the Most Out of Free Trade Agreements in Central America, Washington, D.C.: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/World Bank, pp. 275308.Google Scholar
Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich (2003). From Negative to Positive Integration in the WTO: The TRIPS Agreement and the WTO Constitution, in Cottier, Thomas and Mavroidis, Petros C. (eds.). Intellectual Property: Trade, Competition and Sustainable Development, World Trade Forum Vol. 3, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 2152.Google Scholar
Pflüger, Martin (2008). Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property, in Cottier, Thomas and Véron, Pierre (eds.). Concise International and European IP Law: TRIPS, Paris Convention, European Enforcement and Transfer of Technology, New York: Kluwer Law International, pp. 175269.Google Scholar
Rajamani, Lavanya (2012). Developing Countries and Compliance in the Climate Regime, in Brunnée, Jutta, Doelle, Meinhard and Rajamani, Lavanya (eds.). Promoting Compliance in an Evolving Climate Regime, Cambridge University Press, pp. 367–94.Google Scholar
Ramello, Giovanni B. (2010). Intellectual Property, Social Justice and Economic Efficiency: Insights from Law and Economics, in Flanagan, Anne and Montagnani, Maria L. (eds.). Intellectual Property Law: Economic and Social Justice Perspectives, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 123.Google Scholar
Rao, Niranjan C. (2009). TRIPS and Public Health, in Dasgupta, Paramita (ed.). The WTO at the Crossroads, Cape Town: Concept Publishing Company, pp. 81100.Google Scholar
Reichman, Jerome H. (2014). Intellectual Property in the Twenty-First Century: Will the Developing Countries Lead or Follow? in Cimoli, Mario, Dosi, Giovanni, Maskus, Keith E., Okediji, Ruth L., Reichman, Jerome H. and Stiglitz, Joseph E., (eds.). Intellectual Property Rights: Legal and Economic Challenges for Development, Oxford University Press, pp. 111–81.Google Scholar
Robbins, Carlo A. (2009). Measuring Payments for the Supply and Use of Intellectual Property, in Reinsdorf, Marshall and Slaughter, Matthew J. (eds.). International Trade in Services and Intangibles in the Era of Globalization, University of Chicago Press, pp. 139–71.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, Mendoza Miguel and Wilke, Marie (2011). Revisiting the Single Undertaking: Towards a More Balanced Approach to WTO Negotiations, in Birkbeck, Deere and Birkbeck, Carolyn (eds.). Making Global Trade Governance Work for Development: Perspectives and Priorities from Developing Countries, Cambridge University Press, pp. 486506.Google Scholar
Roffe, Pedro (1998). Control of Anti-Competitive Practices in Contractual Licences under the TRIPS Agreement, in Correa, Carols M. and Yusuf, Abdulqawi A. (eds.). Intellectual Property and International Trade: The TRIPS Agreement, New York: Kluwer Law International, pp. 261–96.Google Scholar
Roffe, Pedro (2005). Comment: Technology Transfer on the International Agenda, in Maskus, Keith E. and Reichman, Jerome (eds.). International Public Goods and Transfer of Technology under a Globalized Intellectual Property Regime, Cambridge University Press, pp. 257–64.Google Scholar
Roffe, Pedro, Spennemann, Christoph and Von Braun, Johanna (2010). Intellectual Property Rights in Free Trade Agreements: Moving beyond TRIPS Minimum Standards, in Correa, Carlos (ed.). Research Handbook on the Protection of Intellectual Property under WTO Rules: Intellectual Property in the WTO, Vol. I, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 266316.Google Scholar
Sands, Philippe (2003). International Courts and the Application of the Concept of “Sustainable Development”, in Hatchard, John and Perry-Kessaris, Amanda (eds.). Law and Development: Facing Complexity in the 21st Century, London: Cavendish Publishing, pp. 147–57.Google Scholar
Schovsbo, Jens (2011). Fire and Water Make Steam – Redefining the Role of Competition Law, in Kur, Annette and Levin, Marianne (eds.). Intellectual Property Rights in a Fair World Trade System: Proposal for Reforms of TRIPS, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 308–58.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Carl (2002). Navigating the Patent Thicket: Cross Licenses, Patent Pools, and Standard Setting, in Jaffe, Adam B., Lerner, Josh, and Stern, Scott (eds.). Innovation Policy and the Economy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 119–50.Google Scholar
Siplon, Patricia (2013). The Troubled Path to HIV/AIDS Universal Treatment Access: Snatching Defeat from the Jaws of Victory? in Smith, Raymond A. (ed.). Global HIV/AIDS Politics, Policy, and Activism: Persistent Challenges and Emerging Issues, Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO, LLC.Google Scholar
Straus, Joseph (1996). Implications of the TRIPS Agreement in the Field of Patent Law, in Beier, Friedrich-Karl and Schricker, Gerhard (eds.). From GATT to TRIPS: The Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons , pp. 160215.Google Scholar
Thompson, Dennis (2001). An Overview of the Draft Code, in Surendra, Patel J., Pedro, Roffe and Abdulqawi, Yusuf A. (eds.). International Technology Transfer: The Origins and Aftermath of the United Nations Negotiations on a Draft Code of Conduct, New York: Kluwer Law International, pp. 5175.Google Scholar
Tian, Yijun George (2012). Consumer Protection and IP Abuse Prevention under the WTO Framework, in Malcolm, Jeremy (ed.). Consumers in the Information Society: Access, Fairness and Representation, Kuala Lumpur: Consumers International.Google Scholar
Ullrich, Hanns (2005). Expansionist Intellectual Property Protection and Reductionist Competition Rules: A TRIPS Perspective, in Maskus, Keith E. and Reichman, Jerome (eds.). International Public Goods and Transfer of Technology under a Globalized Intellectual Property Regime, Cambridge University Press, pp. 726–57.Google Scholar
Villiger, Mark E. (2011). The Rules on Interpretation: Misgivings, Misunderstandings, Miscarriage? The ‘Crucible’ Intended by the International Law Commission, in Cannizzaro, Enzo (ed.). The Law of Treaties beyond the Vienna Convention, Oxford University Press, pp. 105–22.Google Scholar
Von Hase, Andres Moncayo (2008). The Application and Interpretation of the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, in Correa, Carlos M. and Yusuf, Abdulqawi A. (eds.). 2nd edn, Intellectual Property and International Trade: The TRIPS Agreement, New York: Kluwer Law International, pp. 83124.Google Scholar
Watal, Jayashree (2000). India: The Issue of Technology Transfer in the Context of the Montreal Protocol, in Jha, Veena and Hoffmann, Ulrich (eds.). Achieving Objectives of Multilateral Environmental Agreements: A Package of Trade Measures and Positive Measures, UNCTAD/ITCD/TED/6, pp. 45–55.Google Scholar
Watal, Jayashree (2003). Parallel Imports and IPR-Based Dominant Positions: Where Do India’s Interests Lie? in Cottier, Thomas and Mavroidis, Petros C. (eds.). Intellectual Property: Trade, Competition and Sustainable Development, University of Michigan Press, pp. 199210.Google Scholar
Xu, Shiying (2011). Intellectual Property Protection and Competition Law, in Kariyawasam, Rohan (ed.). Chinese Intellectual Property and Technology Laws, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 323–47.Google Scholar
Yu, Peter (2010). The Objectives and Principles of the TRIPS Agreement, in Correa, Carlos M. (ed.). Research Handbook on the Protection of Intellectual Property under WTO Rules: Intellectual Property in the WTO, Vol. I, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp.146–91.Google Scholar
Yu, Vicente Paolo B. (2010). The UN Climate Change Convention and Developing Countries: Towards Effective Implementation, in Faundez, Julio and Celine, Tan (eds.). International Economic Law, Globalization and Developing Countries, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 379410.Google Scholar
Yusuf, Abdulqawi A. (1989). Developing Countries and Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, in UNCTAD (ed.). Uruguay Round: Papers on Selected Issues, UN Publication, UNCTAD/ITP/10.Google Scholar
Yusuf, Abdulqawi A. (2001). Technology Transfer in the Global Environmental Agreements: A New Twist to the North-South Debate, in Patel, Surendra J., Roffe, Pedro and Yusuf, Abdulqawi A. (eds.). International Technology Transfer: The Origins and Aftermath of the United Nations Negotiations on a Draft Code of Conduct, New York: Kluwer Law International, pp. 313–20.Google Scholar
Yusuf, Abdulqawi A. (2008). TRIPS: Background, Principles and General Provisions, in Correa, Carlos M. and Yusuf, Abdulqawi A. (eds.). Intellectual Property and International Trade: The TRIPS Agreement, 2nd edn, New York: Kluwer Law International, pp. 321.Google Scholar
Zhuang, Wei (2013). Evolution of the Patent System in China, in Abbott, Frederick M., Correa, Carlos M. and Drahos, Peter (eds.). Emerging Markets and the World Patent Order, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 155–80.Google Scholar
Abbott, Frederick M. (2001). The TRIPS-Legality of Measures Taken to Address Public Health Crises: A Synopsis, Widener Law Symposium Journal 7, pp. 7185.Google Scholar
Abbott, Frederick M. (2002). The Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health: Lighting a Dark Corner at the WTO, Journal of International Economic Law 5(2), pp. 469505.Google Scholar
Abbott, Frederick M. (2004). Are the Competition Rules in the WTO TRIPS Agreement Adequate? Journal of International Economic Law 7(3), pp. 687703.Google Scholar
Abbott, Frederick M. (2005). Toward a New Era of Objective Assessment in the Field of TRIPS and Variable Geometry for the Preservation of Multilateralism, Journal of International Economic Law 8(1), pp. 77100.Google Scholar
Adam, Alexander (2009). Technology Transfer to Combat Climate Change: Opportunities and Obligations under TRIPS and Kyoto, Journal of High Technology Law 9(1), pp. 120.Google Scholar
Anderson, Robert D. (1998). The Interface between Competition Policy and Intellectual Property in the Context of the International Trading System, Journal of International Economic Law, pp. 655–78.Google Scholar
Anderson, Robert D. and Wager, Hannu (2006). Human Rights, Development and the WTO: The Case of Intellectual Property Rights and Competition Policy, Journal of International Economic Law 9(3), pp. 707–47.Google Scholar
Athreye, Suma and Cantwell, John (2007). Creating Competition? Globalisation and the Emergence of New Technology Producers, Research Policy 36, pp. 209–26.Google Scholar
Aution, Erkko, Hameri, Ari-Pekka and Vuola, Olli (2004). A Framework of Industrial Knowledge Spillovers in Big-Science Centres, Research Policy 33, pp. 107–26.Google Scholar
Baird, Sean (2013). Magic and Hope: Relaxing TRIPS-Plus Provisions to Promote Access to Affordable Pharmaceuticals, Boston College Journal of Law & Social Justice 33(1), pp. 107–45.Google Scholar
Barbosa, Denis Borges, Chon, Margaret and Moncayo Von Hase, Andrés,(2007). Slouching towards Development in International Intellectual Property, Michigan State Law Review, pp. 71–141.Google Scholar
Barfield, Claude E. and Groombridge, Mark A. (1999). Parallel Trade in the Pharmaceutical Industry: Implications for Innovation, Consumer Welfare, and Health Policy, Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal 10, pp. 185265.Google Scholar
Barral, Virginie (2012). Sustainable Development in International Law: Nature and Operation of an Evolutive Legal Norm, The European Journal of International Law 23 (2), pp. 377400.Google Scholar
Barrett, Margreth (2000). United States’ Doctrine of Exhaustion: Parallel Imports of Patented Goods, Northern Kentucky Law Review 27(5), pp. 911–84.Google Scholar
Barton, John H. (2000). Reforming the Patent System, Science 287(5460), pp. 1933–4.Google Scholar
Bently, Lionel (2011). Exclusions from Patentability and Exceptions to Patentees’ Rights: Taking Exceptions Seriously, Current Legal Problems, pp. 1–33.Google Scholar
Berger, Jonathan Michael (2002). Tripping over Patents, AIDS, Access to Treatment and The Manufacturing of Scarcity, Connecticut Journal of International Law 17, pp. 157248.Google Scholar
Bettencourt, Luis M. A., Trancik, Jessika E. and Kaur, Jasleen (2013). Determinants of the Pace of Global Innovation in Energy Technologies, Plos One 8(10), e67864.Google Scholar
Blalock, Garrick and Veloso, Francisco (2006). Imports, Productivity Growth, and Supply Chain Learning, Department of Engineering and Public Policy, Paper 127.Google Scholar
Bodansky, Daniel (1993). The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change: A Commentary, Yale Journal of International Law, 18, pp. 451558.Google Scholar
Bodansky, Daniel (2012). What’s in a Concept? Global Public Goods, International Law and Legitimacy, The European Journal of International Law, 23(3), pp. 651–68.Google Scholar
Boldrin, Michele and Levine, David (2002). The Case against Intellectual Property, The American Economic Review, 92(2), pp. 209–12.Google Scholar
Boldrin, Michele and Levine, David (2013). The Case against Patents, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(1), pp. 322.Google Scholar
Bolton, Michele K. (1993). Imitation Versus Innovation: Lessons to be Learned from the Japanese, Organisational Dynamics, 21(3), pp. 30–45.Google Scholar
Borda, Aldo Zammit (2013). A Formal Approach to Article 38(1)(d) of the ICJ Statute from the Perspective of the International Criminal Courts and Tribunals, The European Journal of International Law, 24(2), pp. 649–61.Google Scholar
Bozeman, Barry (2000). Technology Transfer and Public Policy: A Review of Research and Theory, Research Policy 29, pp. 627–55.Google Scholar
Byers, Michael (2002). Abuse of Rights, An Old Principle, A New Age, McGill Law Journal, 47, pp. 389431.Google Scholar
Cameron, Edwin (2004). Patents and Public Health: Principle, Politics and Paradox, SCRIPT-ed, 1(4), pp. 517–44.Google Scholar
Cann, Wesley A. (2004). On the Relationship between Intellectual Property Rights and the Need of Less-Developed Countries for Access to Pharmaceuticals: Creating a Legal Duty to Supply Under a Theory of Progressive Global Constitutionalism, University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law, 2(3), pp. 755944.Google Scholar
Catanese, Adrienne (1985). Paris Convention, Patent Protection, and Technology Transfer, Boston University International Law Journal, 3, pp. 209–27.Google Scholar
Champ, Paul and Attaran, Amir (2002). Patent Rights and Local Working under the WTO TRIPS Agreement: An Analysis of the U.S. – Brazil Patent Dispute, The Yale Journal of International Law, 27, pp. 365–93.Google Scholar
Chaudhuri, Shubham, Goldberg, Pinelopi K. and Jia, Panle (2006). Estimating the Effects of Global Patent Protection in Pharmaceuticals: A Case Study of Quinolones in India, American Economic Review, 96(5), pp. 14771514.Google Scholar
Cheyne, IIona (2010). Intellectual Property and Climate Change from a Trade Perspective, Nordic Environmental Law Journal, 2, pp. 121–30.Google Scholar
Coe, David T., Helpman, Elhanan and Hoffmaister, Alexander W. (1997). North-South R&D Spillovers, The Economic Journal, 107(440), pp. 134–49.Google Scholar
Consilvio, Mark (2011). The Role of Patents in the International Framework of Clean Technology Transfer: A Discussion of Barriers and Solutions, American University Intellectual Property Brief, pp. 7–16.Google Scholar
Cordray, Monique L. (1994). GATT v. WIPO, 76 J., Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society, pp. 121–44.Google Scholar
Correa, Carlos M. (2001). Review of the TRIPS Agreement: Fostering the Transfer of Technology to Developing Countries, TWN Trade & Development Series 13, published by Third World Network, Penang.Google Scholar
Correa, Carlos M. (2003). Intellectual Property Rights and the Protection of Public Health in Developing Countries, The World Bank Legal Review: Law and Justice for Development, 1, pp. 161205.Google Scholar
Cottier, Thomas, Lalani, Shaheeza and Temmerman, Michelangelo (2014). Use It or Lose It: Assessing the Compatibility of the Paris Convention and TRIPS Agreement with Respect to Local Working Requirements, Journal of International Economic Law, pp. 1–35.Google Scholar
Davis, Kevin E. (2005). Regulation of Technology Transfer to Developing Countries: The Relevance of Institutional Capacity, 27 Law & Policy, pp. 632.Google Scholar
de Werra, Jacques (2010a). How to Protect Trade Secrets in High-Tech Sports? An Intellectual Property Analysis Based on the Experiences at the America’s Cup and in the Formula One Championship, European Intellectual Property Review, 32 (4), pp. 155–64.Google Scholar
de Werra, Jacques (2010b). What Color Is IP? in the Green Debate: IP Perspectives, WIPO Magazine, pp. 17–19.Google Scholar
Dechezleprêtre, Antoine, Glachant, Matthieu and Ménière, Yann (2008). The Clean Development Mechanism and the International Diffusion of Technologies: An Empirical Study, Energy Policy 36(4), pp. 1273–83.Google Scholar
Dechezleprêtre, Antoine, Glachant, Matthieu and Ménière, Yann (2013). What Drives the International Transfer of Climate Change Mitigation Technologies? Empirical Evidence from Patent Data, Environ Resource Econ, 54, pp. 161–78.Google Scholar
Dechezleprêtre, Antoine, Glachant, Matthieu, Hascic, Ivan, Johnstone, Nick, and Meniere, Yann (2011). Invention and Transfer of Climate Change-Mitigation Technologies: A Global Analysis, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 5(1), pp. 109–30.Google Scholar
Derclaye, Estelle (2008). Intellectual Property Rights and Global Warming, Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review, 12(2), pp. 264–97.Google Scholar
Doane, Michael L. (1994). TRIPS and International Intellectual Property Protection in an Age of Advancing Technology, American University International Law Review, 9(2), pp. 465–97.Google Scholar
Drahos, Peter (1995). Global Property Rights in Information: The Story of TRIPS at the GATT, Prometheus, 13(1), pp. 619.Google Scholar
Drahos, Peter (1999). Intellectual Property and Human Rights, Intellectual Property Quarterly 3, pp. 349–71.Google Scholar
Drahos, Peter (2002). Developing Countries and International Intellectual Property Standard-Setting, The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 5(5), pp. 765–89.Google Scholar
Drahos, Peter (2007). Four Lessons for Developing Countries from the Trade Negotiations over Access to Medicines, Liverpool Law Review 28, pp.1139.Google Scholar
Drahos, Peter (2008). “Trust Me”: Patent Offices in Developing Countries, American Journal of Law and Medicine & Ethics, pp. 151–74.Google Scholar
Drumbl, Mark A. (2002). Poverty, Wealth, and Obligation in International Environmental Law, Tulane Law Review, 76(4), pp. 843960.Google Scholar
Dufey, Guillaume (2013). Patents and Standardisation: Competition Concerns in New Technology Markets, Global Antitrust Review, 6, pp. 748.Google Scholar
Eaton, Jonathan and Kortum, Samuel (1999). International Technology Diffusion: Theory and Measurement, International Economic Review, 40(3), pp. 537–70.Google Scholar
Ecos, John, Lall, Sanjaya and Yuwen, Mikyung (1997). Transfer of Technology: An Update, Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, 11(1), pp. 5666.Google Scholar
Ehlermann, Claus-Dieter (2003). Reflections on the Appellate Body of the WTO, Journal of International Economic Law 6(3). pp. 695708.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, Rebecca S. (1989). Patents and the Progress of Science: Exclusive Rights and Experimental Use, The University of Chicago Law Review, 56(3), pp. 1017–86.Google Scholar
Encaoua, David, Guellec, Dominique, and Martinez, Catalina (2006). Patent Systems for Encouraging Innovation: Lessons from Economic Analysis, Research Policy 35, pp. 1423–40.Google Scholar
Erlikhman, Daniel (2003). Jazz Photo and the Doctrine of Patent Exhaustion: Implications to TRIPS and International Harmonization of Patent Protection, Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal, 25 pp. 307–42.Google Scholar
Fair, Robert (2009). Does Climate Change Justify Compulsory Licensing of Green Technology? International Law & Management Review, 6.Google Scholar
Falvey, Rod, Foster, Neil and Greenaway, David (2009). Trade, Imitative Ability and Intellectual Property Rights, Review of World Economics 145, pp. 373404.Google Scholar
Feldman, Alexander M. (2009). Evolving Treaty Obligations: A Proposal for Analysing Subsequent Practice Derived from WTO Dispute Settlement, International Law and Politics, 41, pp. 655706.Google Scholar
Fisher, Larry R. (1967). The Misuse Doctrine and Post Expiration-Discriminatory-and Exorbitant Patent Royalties, Indiana Law Journal, Vol. 43(1), art. 6, pp. 106–29.Google Scholar
Fisher, William (2001). Intellectual Property and Innovation: Theoretical, Empirical and Historical Perspectives, in Seminar on Intellectual Property and Innovation in the Knowledge-Based Economy, The Hague.Google Scholar
Frankel, Susy (2006). WTO Application of “the Customary Rules of Interpretation of Public International Law” to Intellectual Property, Virginia Journal of International Law, 46, pp. 366431.Google Scholar
Frankel, Susy (2009). Challenging TRIPS-Plus Agreements: The Potential Utility of Non-Violation Disputes, Journal of International Economic Law 12(4), pp. 1023–65.Google Scholar
Gaillard, Jacques (2010). Measuring Research and Development in Developing Countries: Main Characteristics and Implications for the Frascati Manual, Science, Technology & Society, 15(1), pp. 77111.Google Scholar
Gana, Ruth L. (1996). Prospects for Developing Countries under the TRIPS Agreement, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 29, pp. 735–75.Google Scholar
Gathii, James Thuo (2002). The Legal Status of the Doha Declaration on TRIPS and Public Health under the Vienna Convention on the Law of the Treaties, Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 15(2), pp. 292317.Google Scholar
Gathii, James Thuo (2011). The Neoliberal Turn in Regional Trade Agreements, Washington Law Review, 86, pp. 421–74.Google Scholar
Geiger, Christophe, Griffiths, Jonathan and Hilty, Reto M. (2008). Declaration on a Balanced Interpretation of the “Three-Step Test” in Copyright Law, IIC, 39, pp. 707–13.Google Scholar
Gervais, Daniel J. (2005). Intellectual Property, Trade and Development: The State of Play, Fordham Law Review, 74 pp. 505–35.Google Scholar
Gervais, Daniel J. (2006). The Changing Landscape of International Intellectual Property, Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, 1(4), pp. 249–55.Google Scholar
Graham, Lawrence D. and Zerbe, Richard O. (1996). Economically Efficient Treatment of Computer Software: Reverse Engineering, Protection, and Disclosure, Rutgers Computer & Technology Law Journal, 22, pp. 61142.Google Scholar
Graham, Stuart J. H., Merges, Robert P., Samuelson, Pam and Sichelman, Ted (2010). High Technology Entrepreneurs and the Patent System: Result of the 2008 Berkeley Patent Survey, Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 24(4), pp. 1255–328.Google Scholar
Grosse, Ruse-Khan Henning (2009). Time for a Paradigm Shift? Exploring Maximum Standards in International Intellectual Property Protection, Trade, Law and Development, 1, pp. 56102.Google Scholar
Grosse, Ruse-Khan Henning (2011). The International Law Relation between TRIPS and Subsequent TRIPS-Plus Free Trade Agreements: Towards Safeguarding TRIPS Flexibilities? Journal of Intellectual Property Law, 18(2), pp. 325–65.Google Scholar
Haag, Thomas A. (2002). TRIPS Since Doha: How Far Will the WTO Go toward Modifying the Terms for Compulsory Licensing? Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society, 84, pp. 945–81.Google Scholar
Haar, Paul S. (1982). Revision of the Paris Convention: A Realignment of Private and Public Interests in the International Patent System, Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 8(1), pp. 77108.Google Scholar
Hall, Bronwyn H. and Helmers, Christian (2010). The Role of Patent Protection in (Clean/Green) Technology Transfer, Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal, 26, pp. 487532.Google Scholar
Halewood, Michael (1997). Regulating Patent Holders: Local Working Requirements and Compulsory Licences at International Law, Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 35(2), art. 2.Google Scholar
Harris, Donald P. (2006). Carrying a Good Joke Too Far: TRIPS and Treaties of Adhesion, Journal of International Law, 27(3).Google Scholar
Helfter, Laurence R. (2004). Regime Shifting: The TRIPS Agreement and New Dynamics of International Intellectual Property Lawmaking, The Yale Journal of International Law, 29, pp. 183.Google Scholar
Heller, Michael A. and Eisenberg, Rebecca S. (1998). Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anti-Commons in Biomedical Research, Science, 280, pp. 698701.Google Scholar
Hesse, Carla (2002). The Rise of Intellectual Property, 700 B.C.–A.D. 2000: An Idea in the Balance, Daedalus, pp. 26–45.Google Scholar
Hettinger, Edwin C. (1989). Justifying Intellectual Property, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 18(1), pp. 1352.Google Scholar
Ho, Cynthia M. (2007). A New World Order for Addressing Patent Rights and Public Health, Chicago – Kent Law Review, 82, pp. 14691515.Google Scholar
Ho, Cynthia M. (2009). Patent Breaking or Balancing?: Separating Strands of Fact from Fiction Under TRIPS, North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation, 34, pp. 371469.Google Scholar
Ho, Samuel P. S. (1997). Technology Transfer to China During the 1980s – How Effective? Some Evidence from Jiangsu, Pacific Affairs 70(1), pp. 85106.Google Scholar
Hoekman, Bernard M., Maskus, Keith E. and Saggi, Kamal (2005). Transfer of Technology to Developing Countries: Unilateral and Multilateral Policy Options, World Development, 33(10), pp. 1587–602.Google Scholar
Hoen, Ellen’t (2002). TRIPS, Pharmaceutical Patents, and Access to Essential Medicines: A Long Way From Seattle to Doha, Chicago Journal of International Law, 3(1), pp. 2746.Google Scholar
Howley, Jessica (2009). The Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Case: The Influence of the International Court of Justice on the Law of Sustainable Development, Queensland Law Student Review, 2(1), pp. 119.Google Scholar
Howse, Robert (2000). The Canadian Generic Medicines Panel: A Dangerous Precedent in Dangerous Time, The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 3(4), pp. 493507.Google Scholar
Javorcik, Beata Smarzynska (2004). The Composition of Foreign Direct Investment and Protection of Intellectual Property Rights: Evidence from Transition Economies, European Economic Review 48, pp. 3962.Google Scholar
Kampf, Roger and Wager, Hannu (2011). The Role of the TRIPS Agreement in the Global Health Policy, Stanford Journal of Law, Science & Policy, pp. 17–41.Google Scholar
Kastenmeier, Robert W. and Beier, David (1989). International Trade and Intellectual Property: Promise, Risks, and Reality, Journal of Transnational Law | Vanderbilt University, 22, pp. 285307.Google Scholar
Keller, Eric (2008). Time-Varying Compulsory License: Facilitating License Negotiation for Efficient Post-Verdict Patent Infringement, Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, 16, pp. 427–51.Google Scholar
Kitch, Edmund W. (1994). The Patent Policy of Developing Countries, Pacific Basin Law Journal, 13, pp. 166–78.Google Scholar
Kunz-Hallstein, Hans Peter (1989). The United States Proposal for a GATT-Agreement on Intellectual Property and the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 22, pp. 265–84.Google Scholar
Kur, Annette (2009). International Norm-Making in the Field of Intellectual Property: A Shift towards Maximum Rules? The WIPO Journal, 1, pp. 2734.Google Scholar
Lane, Eric (2010). Clean Tech Reality Check: Nine International Green Technology Transfer Deals Unhindered by Intellectual Property Rights, Santa Clara Computer & High Technology Law Journal, pp. 533–57.Google Scholar
Lanjouw, Jean Olson and Mody, Ashoka (1996). Innovation and the International Diffusion of Environmentally Responsive Technology, Research Policy, 25, pp. 549–71.Google Scholar
Lennard, Michael (2002). Navigating by the Stars: Interpreting the WTO Agreements, Journal of International Economic Law, 5(1), pp. 1789.Google Scholar
Levin, Richard C., Klevorick, Alvin K., Nelson, Richard R., Winter, Sidney G. (1987). Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, pp. 783–820.Google Scholar
Lewis, Joanna I. (2007). Technology Acquisition and Innovation in the Developing World: Wind Turbine Development in China and India, Studies in Comparative International Development, 42, pp. 208–32.Google Scholar
Littleton, Matthew (2009). The TRIPS Agreement and Transfer of Climate-Change-Related Technologies to Developing Countries, Natural Resources Forum 33, pp. 233–44.Google Scholar
Loughran, Regina A. (1981). The United States Position on Revising the Paris Convention: Quid Pro Quo or Denunciation, Fordham International Law Journal, 5(2), pp. 411–39.Google Scholar
Luff, David (1996). An Overview of International Law of Sustainable Development and a Confrontation between WTO Rules and Sustainable Development, Revue Belge de Droit International, 29(1), pp. 91144.Google Scholar
Machlup, Fritz and Penrose, Edith (1950). The Patent Controversy in the Nineteenth Century, The Journal of Economic History, 10(1), pp. 129.Google Scholar
Mahajan, Anthony J. (1999). Intellectual Property, Contracts, and Reverse Engineering After ProCD: A Proposed Compromise for Computer Software, Fordham Law Review, 67(6), pp. 3297–335.Google Scholar
Maitra, Neel (2010). Access to Environmentally Sound Technology in Developing World: A Proposed Alternative to Compulsory Licensing, Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, 35, pp. 407–45.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Edwin (1986). Patents and Innovation: An Empirical Study, Management Science, 32(2), pp. 173–81.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Edwin, Schwartz, Mark and Wagner, Samuel (1981). Imitation Costs and Patents: An Empirical Study, The Economic Journal, 91(364), pp. 907–18.Google Scholar
Marceau, Gabrielle (1999). A Call for Coherence in International Law: Praises for the Prohibition against “Clinical Isolation” in WTO Dispute Settlement, Journal of World Trade, 33(5), pp. 87152.Google Scholar
Marceau, Gabrielle (2001). Conflicts of Norms and Conflicts of Jurisdictions: The Relationship between the WTO Agreement and MEAs and Other Treaties, Journal of World Trade, 35(6), pp. 1081–131.Google Scholar
Marceau, Gabrielle (2002). WTO Dispute Settlement and Human Rights, European Journal of International Law, 13(4), pp. 753814.Google Scholar
Marceau, Gabrielle (2006). The WTO is NOT a Closed Box, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting, American Society of International Law, 100, pp. 2931.Google Scholar
Marceau, Gabrielle and Trachtman, Joel P. (2014). A Map of the World Trade Organisation Law of Domestic Regulation of Goods: The Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement, the Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures Agreement, and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, Journal of World Trade, 48(2), pp. 351432.Google Scholar
Marong, Alhaji B. M. (2003). From Rio to Johannesburg: Reflections on the Role of International Legal Norms in Sustainable Development, The Georgetown International Environmental Law Review, 16, pp. 2176.Google Scholar
Maskus, Keith E. (1998). The Role of Intellectual Property Rights in Encouraging Foreign Direct Investment and Technology Transfer, Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law, 9, pp. 109–61.Google Scholar
Maskus, Keith E. (2005). Using the International Trading System to Foster Technology Transfer for Economic Development, Michigan State Law Review, pp. 219–41.Google Scholar
Maskus, Keith E. and Penubarti, Mohan (1995). How Trade-Related Are Intellectual Property Rights? Journal of International Economics, 39, pp. 227–48.Google Scholar
McCulloch, Rachel (1981). Technology Transfer to Developing Countries: Implications of International Regulation, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 458, pp. 110–22.Google Scholar
McLachlan, Campbell (2005). The Principle of Systemic Integration and Article 31(3)(c) of the Vienna Convention, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 54(2) pp. 279320.Google Scholar
Menescal, Andrea Koury (2005). Changing WIPO’s Ways? The 2004 Development Agenda in Historical Perspective, The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 8(6), pp. 761–96.Google Scholar
Mercurio, Bryan (2005). The Impact of the Australia-United States Free Trade Agreement on the Provision of the Health Services in Australia, Whittier Law Review, 26, pp. 1051–100.Google Scholar
Mercurio, Bryan and Tyagi, Mitali (2010). Treaty Interpretation in WTO Dispute Settlement: The Outstanding Question of the Legality of Local Working Requirements, Minnesota Journal of International Law, 19(2), pp. 275326.Google Scholar
Michaels, Andrew C (2009). International Technology Transfer and TRIPS Article 66.2: Can Global Administrative Law Help Least-Developed Countries Get What They Bargained for? Georgetown Journal of International Law, 41, pp. 223–61.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Andrew D. (2007). The Legal Basis for Using Principles in WTO Disputes, Journal of International Economic Law, 10(4), pp. 795835.Google Scholar
Moon, Suerie (2008). Does TRIPS Art. 66.2 Encourage Technology Transfer to LDCs?: An Analysis of Country Submissions to the TRIPS Council (1999–2007). UNCTAD-ICTSD Project on IPRs and Sustainable Development, Policy Brief No. 2.Google Scholar
Moon, Suerie (2011). Meaningful Technology Transfer to the LDCs: A Proposal for a Monitoring Mechanism for TRIPS Article 66.2, UNCTAD-ICTSD Project on IPRs and Sustainable Development, Policy Brief No. 9.Google Scholar
Moore, Adam D. (2003). Intellectual Property, Innovation, and Social Progress: The Case against Incentive Based Arguments, Hamline Law Review, 26(3), pp. 602–28.Google Scholar
Morin, Jean-Frederic and Gold, Richard E. (2010). Consensus-Seeking, Distrust and Rhetorical Entrapment: The WTO Decision on Access to Medicines, European Journal of International Relations, 16(4), pp. 563–87.Google Scholar
Nanda, Nitya (2009). Diffusion of Climate-Friendly Technologies: Can Compulsory Licensing Help? Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 14, pp. 241–46.Google Scholar
Ngassam, Christopher (2004). Does the Presence or Lack of Intellectual Property Right Protection Affect International Trade Flows in Emerging Market Economies? An Exploratory Study, Proceedings of the Academy for Studies in International Business, 4(2), pp. 511.Google Scholar
Nguyãẽn, Tú Thanh and Hans, Henrik Lidgard (2008). The CFI Microsoft Judgment and TRIPS Competition Flexibilities, International Trade Law Journal, 16(3), pp. 4151.Google Scholar
Nicholson, Michael W. (2007). The Impact of Industry Characteristics and IPR Policy on Foreign Direct Investment, Review of World Economics, 143(1). pp. 2754.Google Scholar
Noehrenberg, Eric (2003). TRIPS, the Doha Declaration and Public Health, The Journal of World Intellectual Property 6, pp. 379–83.Google Scholar
Nunnenkamp, Peter and Spatz, Julius (2004). Intellectual Property Rights and Foreign Direct Investment: A Disaggregated Analysis, Review of World Economics, 140(3), pp. 393414.Google Scholar
Odman, Ayse N. (2000). Using TRIPS to Make the Innovation Process Work, The Journal of World Intellectual Property 3, pp. 343–71.Google Scholar
Oguamanam, Chidi (2003). The Convention on Biological Diversity and Intellectual Property Rights: The Challenge of Indigenous Knowledge, Southern Cross University Law Review, 7, pp. 89141.Google Scholar
Orellana, Marcos A. (2009). Evolving WTO Law Concerning Health, Safety and Environmental Measures, Trade, Law and Development, 1, pp. 103–44.Google Scholar
Palmeter, David and Mavroidis, Petros (1998). The WTO Legal System: Sources of Law, The American Journal of International Law, 92, pp. 398413.Google Scholar
Park, Kichan, Ali, Murad and Chevalier, Francoise (2011). A Spiral Process Model of Technological Innovation in a Developing Country: The Case of Samsung, African Journal of Business Management, 5(13), pp. 5162–78.Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost (2010). The Dog That Barked But Didn’t Bite: 15 Years of Intellectual Property Disputes at the WTO, Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 1(2), pp. 389429.Google Scholar
Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich (2000). The WTO Constitution and Human Rights, Journal of International Economic Law, 3(1), pp. 1925.Google Scholar
Popp, David (2008). International Technology Transfer for Climate Policy, Centre for Policy Research, Paper 4.Google Scholar
Purcell, Joseph M. (2014). The “Essential Facilities” Doctrine in the Sunlight: Stacking Patented Genetic Traits in Agriculture,” St. John’s Law Review, 85(3), pp. 1251–74.Google Scholar
Rai, Rajnish Kumar (2008). Patentable Subject Matter Requirements: An Evaluation of Proposed Exclusions to India’s Patent Law in Light of India’s Obligations under the TRIPS Agreement and Options for India, Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property, 8, pp. 4184.Google Scholar
Rai, Rajnish Kumar and Jagannathan, Sirnath (2012). Parallel Imports and Unparallel Laws: An Examination of the Exhaustion Doctrine through the Lens of Pharmaceutical Products, Information and Communications Technology Law, 21(1), pp. 5389.Google Scholar
Rajamani, Lavanya (2000). The Principle of Common but Differentiated Responsibility and the Balance of Commitments under the Climate Regime, RECIEL, 9(2), pp. 120–31.Google Scholar
Reddy, G. B. and Kari, Harunrashid A. (2013). Local Working of Patents-Law and Implementation in India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 18, pp. 1527.Google Scholar
Reichman, Jerome H. (1995). Universal Minimum Standards of Intellectual Property Protection under the TRIPS Component of the WTO Agreement, The International Lawyer, 29(2), pp. 345–88.Google Scholar
Reichman, Jerome H. (1996). From Free Riders to Fair Followers: Global Competition under the TRIPS Agreement, N.Y.U Journal of International Law and Politics, 29, pp. 1193.Google Scholar
Reichman, Jerome H. (1998). Securing Compliance with the TRIPS Agreement after US v. India, Journal of International Economic Law, pp. 585–601.Google Scholar
Reichman, Jerome H. (2000). The TRIPS Agreement Comes of Age: Conflict or Cooperation with the Developing Countries? Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 32, pp. 441–70.Google Scholar
Reichman, Jerome H. (2009a). Intellectual Property In the Twenty-First Century: Will the Developing Countries Lead or Follow? Houston Law Review, 46, pp. 1115–85.Google Scholar
Reichman, Jerome H. (2009b). Compulsory Licensing of Patented Pharmaceutical Inventions: Evaluating the Options, Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 37(2), pp. 247–63.Google Scholar
Reichman, Jerome H. and Lange, David (1998). Bargaining around the TRIPS Agreement: The Case for On-Going Public-Private Initiatives to Facilitate Worldwide Intellectual Property Transactions, Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law, 9, pp. 1168.Google Scholar
Reichman, Jerome H. and Okediji, Ruth L. (2012). When Copyright Law and Science Collide: Empowering Digitally Integrated Research Methods on a Global Scale, Minnesota Law Review, 96, pp. 1362–480.Google Scholar
Reisman, Michael W. (2009). Opinion with Respect to Selected International Legal Problems in LCIA Case No. 7941, United States of America v. Canada, London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA). LCIA Case No. 81010.Google Scholar
Ricolfi, Marco (2006). Is There an Antitrust Antidote against IP Overprotection within TRIPS? Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review, 10(2), pp. 305–67.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, Edson Beas Jr. and Bryan, Murphy (2006). Brazil’s Prior Consent Law: A Dialogue between Brazil and the United States Over Where the TRIPS Agreement Currently Sets the Balance between the Protection of Pharmaceutical Patents and Access to Medicines, Albany Law Journal of Science and Technology, 16, pp. 423–56.Google Scholar
Rosenne, Shabtai (1982). The Election of Five Members of the International Court of Justice in 1981, The American Journal of International Law, 76(2), pp. 364–70.Google Scholar
Saha, Subhasis (2009). Patent Law and TRIPS: Compulsory Licensing of Patents and Pharmaceuticals, Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society, 91, pp. 364–74.Google Scholar
Samuelson, Pamela and Scotchmer, Suzanne (2002). The Law and Economics of Reverse Engineering, The Yale Law Journal, 111, pp. 1575–663.Google Scholar
Sands, Philippe (1994). The “Greening” of International Law: Emerging Principles and Rules, Global Legal Studies Journal, 1, pp. 293323.Google Scholar
Sands, Philippe (1995). International Law in the Field of Sustainable Development, British Yearbook of International Law, 65(1), pp. 303–81.Google Scholar
Sell, Susan K. (1989). Intellectual Property as a Trade Issue: From the Paris Convention to GATT, Legal Studies Forum, 13(4), pp. 407–22.Google Scholar
Sell, Susan K. (2011). TRIPS Was Never Enough: Vertical Forum Shifting, FTAs, ACTA, and TPP, Journal of Intellectual Property Law, 18, pp. 447–78.Google Scholar
Sell, Susan K. and Prakash, Aseem (2004). Using Ideas Strategically: The Contest between Business and NGO Networks in Intellectual Property Rights, International Studies Quarterly 48, pp. 143–75.Google Scholar
Shabalala, Dalindyebo (2009). An Introduction to this Issue: Climate Change and Technology Transfer, Sustainable Development Law & Policy, 9(3), Clean Technology and International Trade.Google Scholar
Shanker, Daya (2002). The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, the Dispute Settlement System of the WTO and the Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement, Journal of World Trade 36(4), pp. 721–72.Google Scholar
Sharma, Ruchi and Saxena, K. K. (2012). Strengthening the Patent Regime: Benefits for Developing Countries – A Survey, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 17, pp. 122–32.Google Scholar
Shashikant, Sangeeta (2009). No Patents on Climate-Friendly Technologies, Says South, TWN Info Service on Intellectual Property Issues, 12 June, available at www.twnside.org.sg/title2/intellectual_property/info.service/2009/twn.ipr.info.090609.htmGoogle Scholar
Shavell, Steven and van Ypersele, Tanguy (2001). Rewards versus Intellectual Property Rights, Journal of Law and Economics, 44, pp. 525–47.Google Scholar
Smith, Pamela J. (2001). How Do Foreign Patent Rights Affect U.S. Exports, Affiliate Sales, and Licenses? Journal of International Economics, 55, pp. 411–39.Google Scholar
Son, Seungwoo (2002). Selective Refusals to Sell Patented Goods: The Relationship between Patent Rights and Antitrust Law, Journal of Law, Technology & Policy, 2002(1), pp. 109–91.Google Scholar
Sovacool, Benjamin K. (2008). Placing a Glove on the Invisible Hand: How Intellectual Property Rights May Impede Innovation in Energy Research and Development (R&D), Albany Law Journal of Science and Technology, 18(2), pp. 381440.Google Scholar
Stec, Stephen and Eckstein, Gabriel E. (1997). Of Solemn Oaths and Obligations: The Environmental Impact of the ICJ’s Decision in the Case Concerning the Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Project, Yearbook of International Environmental Law, 8, pp. 4150.Google Scholar
Stewart, Frances and Ghani, Ejaz (1991). How Significant Are Externalities for Development? World Development, 19(6), pp. 569–94.Google Scholar
Stout, Maria Victoria (2008). Crossing the TRIPS Non-discrimination Line: How CAFTA Pharmaceutical Patent Provisions Violate TRIPS Article 27.1, Boston University Journal of Science and Technology Law, 14, pp. 177200.Google Scholar
Suwan-in, Nattapong (2012). Compulsory Licensing, A Long Debate on TRIPS Agreement Interpretation: Discovering the Truth of Thailand’s Imposition on Pharmaceutical Patents, Asian Journal of WTO & International Health Law and Policy, 7, pp. 225–61.Google Scholar
Sykes, Alan O. (2002). TRIPS, Pharmaceuticals, Developing Countries, and the Doha “Solution”, Chicago Journal of International Law, 3, pp. 4768.Google Scholar
Taubman, Antony (2008). Rethinking TRIPS: ‘Adequate Remuneration’ for Non-Voluntary Patent Licensing, Journal of International Economic Law 11(4), pp. 927–70.Google Scholar
Thomas, Chantal (1999). Transfer of Technology in the Contemporary International Order, Fordham International Law Journal, 22, pp. 2096–111.Google Scholar
Timmermann, Cristian and van den Belt, Henk (2013). Intellectual Property and Global Health: From Corporate Social Responsibility to the Access to Knowledge Movement, Liverpool Law Review, 34(1), pp. 4773.Google Scholar
Tully, Danielle L. (2003). Prospects for Progress: The TRIPS Agreement and Developing Countries after the Doha Conference, Boston College International & Comparative Law Review, 26, pp. 129–43.Google Scholar
Ullrich, Hanns (2004). Expansionist Intellectual Property Protection and Reductionist Competition Rules: A TRIPS Perspective, Journal of International Economic Law, pp. 401–30.Google Scholar
UNEP (2003). Phytotechnologies: A Technical Approach in Environmental Management, IETC Freshwater Management Series, 7, available at www.unep.or.jp/Ietc/Publications/Freshwater/FMS7/2.asp#Ia.Google Scholar
van Ark, Bart, O’Mahony, Mary and Timmer, Marcel P. (2008). The Productivity Gap between Europe and the United States: Trends and Causes, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22(1), pp. 2544.Google Scholar
Verhoosel, Gaetan (1998). Beyond the Unsustainable Rhetoric of Sustainable Development: Transferring Environmentally Sound Technologies, The Georgetown International Environmental Law Review, 11, pp. 4976.Google Scholar
Weinreb, Lloyd L. (1998). Copyright for Functional Expression, Harvard Law Review, 111(5), pp. 1149–254.Google Scholar
Yi, Qian (2007). Do National Patent Laws Stimulate Domestic Innovation in a Global Patenting Environment? A Cross-Country Analysis of Pharmaceutical Patent Protection, 1978–2002, The Review of Economics and Statistics 89(3), pp. 436–53.Google Scholar
Yilmaz, Kamil and Mody, Ashoka (2002). Imports for Export Competitiveness, World Bank Economic Review, 16(1), pp. 2348.Google Scholar
Young, Margaret (2007). The WTO’s Use of Relevant Rules of International Law: An Analysis of the Biotech Case, The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 56(4), pp. 907–30.Google Scholar
Yu Peter, K. (2009). The Objectives and Principles of the TRIPS Agreement, Houston Law Review, 46, pp. 9791046.Google Scholar
Zaman, Khorsed (2013). The TRIPS Patent Protection Provisions and Their Effects on Transferring Climate Change Technologies to LDCs and Poor Developing Countries: A Critical Appraisal, Asian Journal of International Law, 3, pp. 137–61.Google Scholar
Zeitler, Helge Elisabeth (2005). “Good Faith” in the WTO Jurisprudence: Necessary Balancing Element or an Open Door to Judicial Activism, Journal of International Economic Law 8(3), pp. 721–58.Google Scholar
Zhou, Yuanchun and Zou, Ji (2009). The Intellectual Property Issues in International Development and Transfer of Climate-Friendly Technologies, [in Chinese], Paper presented in PACE Conference, 12–15 July.Google Scholar
Zhou, Yuanchun, Zou, Ji and Wang, Ke (2010). How to Conquer the IPR Barriers in the Low Carbon Technologies? [in Chinese], Environmental Protection, 2, pp. 6870.Google Scholar
Zhuang, Wei (2011). Intellectual Property Rights and Transfer of Clean Energy Technologies, International Journal of Public Law and Policy, 1(4), pp. 384401.Google Scholar
Zou, Ji, Wang, Ke, Fu, Sha et al. (2009). Proposal on Innovative Mechanism for Development and Transfer of Environmentally Sound Technologies, Economic Science Press.Google Scholar
Abbot, Frederick M. (2009). Innovation and Technology Transfer to Address Climate Change: Lessons from the Global Debate on Intellectual Property and Public Health, ICTSD’s Programme on IPRs and Sustainable Development, Issue Paper No. 24, Geneva: ICTSD.Google Scholar
Athreye, Suma and Yang, Yong (2011). Disembodied Knowledge Flows in the World Economy, WIPO Economic Research Working Papers No. 3.Google Scholar
Ban, Ki-moon (2008). Statement by United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon at the opening of the High-Level Segment of COP 14 in Poznan, available at http://unfccc.int/2860.php.Google Scholar
Barratt, Amanda (2008). The Battelle for Policy Space: Strategic Advantages of a Human Rights Approach in International Intellectual Property Negotiations, unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Cape Town.Google Scholar
Barton, John H. (2007a). New Trends in Technology Transfer: Implications for National and International Policy, Issue Paper No. 18, Geneva: ICTSD.Google Scholar
Barton, John H. (2007b). Intellectual Property and Access to Clean Energy Technologies in Developing Countries: An Analysis of Solar Photovoltaic, Biofuel and Wind Technologies, Trade and Sustainable Energy Series Issue Paper No. 2, Geneva: ICTSD.Google Scholar
Barton, John H. (2008). Mitigating Climate Change through Technology Transfer: Addressing the Needs of Developing Countries, Energy, Environment and Development Programme: Programme Paper 08/02, Chatham House.Google Scholar
Bollyky, Thomas J. (2009). Intellectual Property Rights and Climate Change: Principles for Innovation and Access to Low-Carbon Technology, Centre for Global Development (CGD) Notes.Google Scholar
Brown, Marilyn A., Chandler, Jess, Lapsa, Melissa V. and Sovacool, Benjamin K. (2008). Carbon Lock-In: Barriers to Deploying Climate Change Mitigation Technologies, Oak Ridge National Laboratory managed by UT-Battelle, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy, ORNL/TM-2007/124.Google Scholar
Baykal, Yesim (2013). WIPO GREEN: the Sustainable Technology Marketplace, presented at the Conference on Climate Change in Africa: Advancing Knowledge, Technology, Policy and Practice, available at www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/africa/en/wipo_kenya_cic_jpo_inn_nbo_13/wipo_kenya_cic_jpo_inn_nbo_13_t_1.pdfGoogle Scholar
Cannady, Cynthia (2009). Access to Climate Change Technology by Developing Countries: A Practical Strategy, ICTSD’s Programme on IPRs and Sustainable Development, Issue Paper No. 25, Geneva: ICTSD.Google Scholar
Centre for International Environmental Law (2010). Technology Transfer in the UNFCCC and Other International Legal Regimes: The Challenges of Systemic Integration, Background Paper, International Council on Human Rights Policy.Google Scholar
Centre for International Environmental Law (CIEL) (2009). Frameworks and Options for Addressing Technology Cooperation in the UNFCCC: National and Multilateral Elements, Background Brief for the Workshop on: Operationalizing of Technology Cooperation in the UNFCCC: Building Civil Society Viewpoints into Copenhagen, 11–15 May 2009.Google Scholar
CISDL(2002). The Principle of Common but Differentiated Responsibilities: Origins and Scope, A CISDL Legal Brief for the World Summit on Sustainable Development, available at http://cisdl.org/public/docs/news/brief_common.pdf.Google Scholar
Copenhagen Economics (2009). Are IPR a Barrier to the Transfer of Climate Change Technology? Report prepared by Copenhagen Economics A/S and The IPR Company ApS.Google Scholar
Correa, Carlos M. (1999). Intellectual Property Rights and the Use of Compulsory Licenses: Options for Developing Countries, Geneva: South Centre Working Papers.Google Scholar
Correa, Carlos M. (2000). Integrating Public Health Concerns into Patent Legislation in Developing Countries, Geneva: South Centre Working Papers.Google Scholar
Correa, Carlos M. (2002). Implications of the Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health, Health Economics and Drugs EDM Series No. 12, published by WHO.Google Scholar
Correa, Carlos M. (2007). Intellectual Property and Competition Law: Exploring Some Issues of Relevance to Developing Countries, Geneva: ICTSD, ICTSD IPRs and Sustainable Development Programme Issue Paper No. 21.Google Scholar
Correa, Carlos M. (2009). The Push for Stronger Enforcement Rules: Implications for Developing Countries, The Global Debate on the Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights and Developing Countries, Programme on IPRs and Sustainable Development, Issue Paper No. 22, Geneva: ICTSD, pp. 27–80.Google Scholar
Correa, Carlos M. (2011). Pharmaceutical Innovation, Incremental Patenting and Compulsory Licensing, Research Paper No. 41.Google Scholar
Correa, Carlos M. (2012). Mechanisms for International Cooperation in Research and Development: Lessons for the Context of Climate Change, Research Paper No. 43, Geneva: South Centre Working Papers.Google Scholar
Correa, Carlos M. (2013). Innovation and Technology Transfer of Environmentally Sound Technologies, presentation at the Centre for International Environmental Studies of the Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, 9 October, Geneva.Google Scholar
Cottier, Thomas, Lalani, Shaheeza, and Temmerman, Michelangelo (2013). Use It or Lose It? Assessing the Compatibility of the Paris Convention and TRIPS With Respect to Local Working Requirements, Working Paper No. 2012/11.Google Scholar
Dechezleprêtre, Antoine (2013). Fast-Tracking Green Patent Applications: An Empirical Analysis, ICTSD Programme on Innovation, Technology and Intellectual Property, Issue Paper No. 37, Geneva: ICTSD.Google Scholar
Drahos, Peter (2002). Developing Countries and International Intellectual Property Standard-Setting, Commission on Intellectual Property Rights, Study Paper 8.Google Scholar
Doranova, Asel, Costa, Ionara and Duysters, Geert (2009). Knowledge Base Determinants of Technology Sourcing in the Clean Development Mechanism Projects, UNU-MERIT Working Paper Series No. 2009–015.Google Scholar
Dupasquier, Chantal and Osakwe, Patrick N. (2005). Foreign Direct Investment in Africa: Performance, Challenges and Responsibilities, African Trade Policy Centre, Work in Progress No. 21.Google Scholar
Dutfield, Graham and Suthersanen, Uma (2004). Harmonization or Differentiation in Intellectual Property Protection? Lessons from History, Occasional Paper 15, Geneva: QUNO.Google Scholar
Earth Negotiations Bulletin (2006). Summary of the Twelfth Conference of the Parties to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change and Second Meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol: 6–17 November 2006.Google Scholar
Earth Negotiations Bulletin (2007). Summary of the Thirteenth Conference of the Parties to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change and Third Meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol: 3–15 December 2007.Google Scholar
Falvey, Rod and Foster, Neil (2006). The Role of Intellectual Property Rights in Technology Transfer and Economic Growth: Theory and Evidence, Vienna: UNIDO Working Papers.Google Scholar
Foray, Dominique (2009). Technology Transfer in the TRIPS Age: The Need for New Types of Partnerships between the Least Developed and Most Advanced Economies, ICTSD programme on IPRs and Sustainable Development, Issue Paper No. 23, Geneva: ICTSD.Google Scholar
Garrison, Christopher (2006). Exceptions to Patent Rights in Developing Countries, UNCTAD-ICTSD Project on IPRs and Sustainable Development, Issue Paper No. 17, Geneva: UNCTAD and ICTSD.Google Scholar
Gehl Sampath, Padmashree and Roffe, Pedro (2012). Unpacking the International Technology Transfer Debate: Fifty Years and Beyond, ICTSD Programme on Innovation, Technology and Intellectual Property, working paper, Geneva: ICTSD.Google Scholar
Global Environment Facility (2010). Implementing the Poznan Strategic Program on Technology Transfer, Professional Graphics Printing Co.Google Scholar
Granstrand, Ove (2003). Innovation and Intellectual Property, Background paper to the Concluding Roundtable Discussion on IPR at the DRUID Summer Conference 2003 on Creating, Sharing and Transferring Knowledge: The Role of Geography, Institutions and Organisations, Copenhagen 12–14 June.Google Scholar
Grosse, Ruse-Khan Henning (2008). A Comparative Analysis of Policy Space in WTO Law, Research Paper Series No. 08–02, Munich: Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property, Competition and Tax Law.Google Scholar
Grosse, Ruse-Khan Henning (2010). Sustainable Development in International Intellectual Property Law – New Approaches from EU Economic Partnership Agreements? ICTSD’s Programme on IPRs and Sustainable Development, Issue Paper No. 29, Geneva: ICTSD.Google Scholar
Gueye, Moustapha Kamal, Sell, Malena and Strachan, Janet (2009). Trade, Climate Change and Sustainable Development: Key Issues for Small States, Least Developed Countries and Vulnerable Economics, Commonwealth Secretariat, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14217/9781848590007-en.Google Scholar
Harvey, Ian (2008). Intellectual Property Rights: The Catalyst to Deliver Low Carbon Technologies, Briefing Paper: Breaking the Climate Deadlock, The Climate Group.Google Scholar
Hoekman, Bernard M., Maskus, Keith E. and Saggi, Kamal (2004). Transfer of Technology to Developing Countries: Unilateral and Multilateral Policy Options, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3332.Google Scholar
Hutchison, Cameron (2007). Does TRIPS Facilitate or Impede Climate Change Technology Transfer into Developing Countries, CISDL Legal Working Paper Series on Climate Change Law and Policy, CISDL.Google Scholar
ICTSD (2008). Climate Change, Technology Transfer and Intellectual Property Rights, paper prepared for the Trade and Climate Change Seminar, 18–20 June, Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
Iliev, Ilian (2012). Role of Patents in Renewable Energy Technology Innovation, Presentation to IRENA Roundtable on Assessment of IPRs for Promoting Renewable Energy, 25 October, Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd.Google Scholar
International Chamber of Commerce (2009). Climate Change and Intellectual Property, ICC Document No. 213/71 and No. 450/1050.Google Scholar
Johnson, Daniel K. N. and Lybecker, Kristina M. (2009). Innovating for an Uncertain Market: A Literature Review of the Constraints on Environmental Innovation, No. 2009–06. Colorado College Working Paper.Google Scholar
Johnson, Daniel K. N. and Lybecker, Kristina M. (2009). Challenges to Technology Transfer: A Literature Review of the Constraints on Environmental Technology Dissemination, Colorado College Working Paper 2009–07.Google Scholar
Khor, Martin (2008). IPRs, Technology Transfer and Climate Change, Third World Network, available at www.un.org/esa/analysis/devplan/egm_climatechange/khor.pdf.Google Scholar
Kim, Linsu (2003). Technology Transfer and Intellectual Property Rights: The Korean Experience, UNCTAD-ICTSD Project on IPRs and Sustainable Development, Issue Paper No. 2, Geneva: ICTSD and UNCTAD.Google Scholar
Lall, Sanjaya (2003). Indicators of the Relative Importance of IPRs in Developing Countries, UNCTAD-ICTSD Project on IPRs and Sustainable Development, Issue Paper No. 3, Geneva: ICTSD and UNCTAD.Google Scholar
Lamy, Pascal (2007). Globalization and the Environment in a Reformed UN: Charting a Sustainable Development Path, Speech at the 24th Session of the Governing Council/Global Ministerial Environmental Forum, Nairobi, 5 February 2007, available at www.wto.org/english/news_e/sppl_e/sppl54_e.htm.Google Scholar
Latif, Ahmed Abdel (2012). Intellectual Property Rights and Green Technologies from Rio to Rio: An Impossible Dialogue? Policy Brief No. 14, Geneva: ICTSD.Google Scholar
Latif, Ahmed Abdel, Maskus, Keith E., Okediji, Ruth, Reichman, Jerome and Roffe, Pedro (2011). Overcoming the Impasse on Intellectual Property and Climate Change at the UNFCCC: A Way Forward, Policy Brief No.11.Google Scholar
Lemoine, Francoise and Unal-kesenci, Deniz (2003). Trade and Technology Transfers: A Comparative Study of Turkey, India and China, CEPII, Working Paper, No. 2003–16.Google Scholar
Lewis, Joanna I. (2007). A Comparison of Wind Power Industry Development Strategies in Spain, India and China, prepared for the Centre for Resource Solutions Supported by the Energy Foundation, China Sustainable Energy Program, 19 July.Google Scholar
Littleton, Matthew (2008). The TRIPS Agreement and Transfer of Climate-Change-Related Technologies to Developing Countries, DESA Working Paper No. 71, ST/ESA/2008/DWP/71.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Edwin (1995). Intellectual Property Protection, Direct Investment and Technology Transfer: Germany, Japan and the United States, International Finance Corporation Discussion Paper No. 27, published by the World Bank and International Finance Corporation.Google Scholar
Maskus, Keith E. (2004). Encouraging International Technology Transfer, ICTSD and UNCTAD Issue Paper No. 7, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Maskus, Keith E. (2010). Differentiated Intellectual Property Regimes for Environmental and Climate Technologies, OECD Environment Working Papers, No. 17, at p. 7, OECD Publishing, doi: 10.1787/5kmfwjvc83vk-en.Google Scholar
Maskus, Keith E. and Okediji, Ruth L. (2010). Intellectual Property Rights and International Technology Transfer to Address Climate Change: Risks, Opportunities and Policy Options, ICTSD’s Programme on IPRs and Sustainable Development, Issue Paper No. 32, Geneva: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development.Google Scholar
Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition (2014). Declaration on Patent Protection: Regulatory Sovereignty under TRIPS, available at www.ip.mpg.de/files/pdf2/Patent_Declaration1.pdf.Google Scholar
Misati, Evans and Adachi, Kiyoshi (2010). The Research and Experimentation Exceptions in Patent Law: Jurisdictional Variations and the WIPO Development Agenda, UNCTAD-ICTSD Project on IPRs and Sustainable Development, Policy Brief No. 7.Google Scholar
Moon, Suerie (2011). Meaningful Technology Transfer to the LDCs: A Proposal for a Monitoring Mechanism for TRIPS Article 66.2, UNCTAD-ICTSD Project on IPRs and Sustainable Development, Policy Brief No. 9.Google Scholar
Moore, Mike (2001). Countries Must Feel Secure That They Can Use TRIPS’ Flexibility, 20 June, available at www.wto.org/english/news_e/news01_e/dg_trips_medicines_010620_e.htm.Google Scholar
Musungu, Sisule F., Villanueva, Susan and Blasetti, Roxana (2004). Utilizing TRIPS Flexibilities for Public Health Protection through South – South Regional Frameworks, Geneva: South Centre.Google Scholar
Nanda, Nitya and Srivastava, Nidhi (2011). Facilitating Technology Transfer for Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation, prepared for the 17th Conference of Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 28 November–9 December 2011, The Energy and Resources Institute.Google Scholar
OECD (1995). Technologies for Clearer Production and Products: Towards Technological Transformation for Sustainable Development, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Oliva, Maria Julia (2009). Technologies for Climate Change and Intellectual Property: Issues for Small Developing Countries, Information Note No. 12.Google Scholar
Olivier, et al. (2012). Trends in Global CO2 Emissions: 2012 Report - Background Studies, PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency.Google Scholar
Panagariya, Arvind (2000). The Millennium Round and Developing Countries: Negotiating Strategies and Areas of Benefits, G-24 Discussion Paper Series: Research Papers for the Intergovernmental Group of Twenty-Four on International Monetary Affairs, New York and Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar
Park, Walter G. and Lippoldt, Douglas (2005). International Licensing and the Strengthening of Intellectual Property Rights in Developing Countries During the 1990s, OECD Economic Studies No. 40, 2005/1, pp. 7–48.Google Scholar
Pueyo, Ana and Linares, Pedro (2012). Renewable Technology Transfer to Developing Countries: One Size Does not Fit All, IDS Working Paper, Vol. 2012, No. 412, published by the Institute of Development Studies.Google Scholar
Reichman, Jerome H. and Hasenzahl, Catherine (2003). Non-voluntary Licensing of Patented Inventions: Historical Perspective, Legal Framework under TRIPS, and an Overview of the Practice in Canada and the United States of America, UNCTAD-ICTSD Project on IPRs and Sustainable Development, Issue Paper No. 5, Geneva: UNCTAD and ICTSD.Google Scholar
Reichman, Jerome, Rai Arti, K., Newell, Richard G. and Wiener, Jonathan B. (2008). Intellectual Property and Alternatives: Strategies for Green Innovation, Energy, Environment and Development Programme Paper: 08/03, Chatham House, UK.Google Scholar
Saad, Abughanm (2012). The Protection of Pharmaceutical Patents and Data under TRIPS and US – Jordan FTA: Exploring the Limits of Obligations and Flexibilities: A Study of the Impact on the Pharmaceutical Sector in Jordan, SJD thesis, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Seaton Associates (2002). Knowledge Transfer, Discussion Paper prepared for the AQUADAPT workshop, Montpellier, France, 25–27 October.Google Scholar
Serafino, David (2007). Survey of Patent Pools Demonstrates Variety of Purposes and Management Structures, KEI Research Note 2007.Google Scholar
Seres, Stephen (2008). Analysis of Technology Transfer in CDM Projects, Prepared for the UNFCCC Registration and Issuance Unit CDM/SDM, http://cdm.unfccc.int/Reference/Reports/TTreport/TTrep08.pdf.Google Scholar
Shashikant, Sangeeta (2009). Developing Countries Call for No Patents on Climate-Friendly Technologies, TWN Bonn News Update 15, Third World Network, 11 June 2009.Google Scholar
Singer, Peter and Schroeder, Doris (2009). Ethical Reasons for Intellectual Property Rights Reform, A Report (D 1.3) for INNOVA P2, CAPPE, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
South Centre (2009). Accelerating Climate-Relevant Technology Innovation and Transfer to Developing Countries: Using TRIPS Flexibilities under the UNFCCC, SC/IAKP/AN/ENV/1, SC/GGDP/AN/ENV/8, August 2009, Geneva.Google Scholar
South Centre and CIEL (2008). The Technology Transfer Debate in the UNFCCC: Politics, Patents and Confusion, IP Quarterly Update, 4th Quarter.Google Scholar
Spennemann, Christoph (2010). TRIPS Pre-Grant Flexibilities: Patentable Subject Matter, UNCTAD presentation, available at www.ictsd.org/downloads/2010/01/patentability-criteria-rev.pdf.Google Scholar
Stilwell, Matthews and Tuerk, Elisabeth (2001). Towards a Full Review of the WTO’s TRIPS Agreement under Article 71.1, Centre for International Environmental Law, available at www.ciel.org/Publications/Assessment_Trips_article711.pdf.Google Scholar
Syam, Nirmalya (2010). Rush for Patents May Hinder Transfer of New Climate-Friendly Technologies, South Bulletin, 44, 8 March, pp. 1112.Google Scholar
Taubman, Antony and Watal, Jayashree (2010). The WTO TRIPS Agreement – A Practical Overview for Climate Change Policymakers, Documentation used in technical cooperation activities of the WTO’s Intellectual Property Division, available at www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/trips_e/ta_docs_e/8_3_overviewclimatechange_e.pdf.Google Scholar
Teng, Fei, Chen, Wenying and He, Jiankun (2008). Possible Development of a Technology Clean Development Mechanism in a Post-2012 Regime, prepared for the Harvard Project on International Climate Agreements, Discussion Paper 08–24.Google Scholar
The ICC Commission on Intellectual Property (2011). Intellectual Property: Powerhouse for Innovation and Economic Growth, Paris: International Chamber of Commerce.Google Scholar
Thomas, John R. (2015). Tailoring the Patent System for Specific Industries, Congressional Research Service Report 7–5700.Google Scholar
UNCTAD (2003). Course on Dispute Settlement: International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes, Vol. 3, United Nations.Google Scholar
UNCTAD and ICTSD (2003). Intellectual Property Rights: Implications for Development, UNCTAD-ICTSD Project on IPRs and Sustainable Development, Policy Discussion Paper, Geneva: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development and United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.Google Scholar
UNDP (2011). Technological Cooperation and Climate Change: Issues and Perspectives, Working papers presented at the Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India-UNDP Consultation on Technology Cooperation for Addressing Climate Change, New Delhi: United Nations Development Program.Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development (2012). Science and Technology for Sustainable Development, RIO 2012 Issue Briefs, No. 12.Google Scholar
Walker, Simon (2001). The TRIPS Agreement, Sustainable Development and the Public Interest, Discussion Paper, IUCN, Gland.Google Scholar
Watson, Jim, MacKerron, Gordon, Ockwell, David and Wang, Tao (2007). Technology and Carbon Mitigation in Developing Countries: Are Cleaner Coal Technologies A Viable Option? Background Paper for Human Development Report 2007, UNDP.Google Scholar
Williams, Heidi L. (2010). Intellectual Property Rights and Innovation: Evidence from the Human Genome, NBER Working Paper Series, Working Paper 16213, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Wilson, Tim (2008). Undermining Mitigation Technology: Compulsory Licensing, Patents and Tariffs, Melbourne: Institute of Public Affairs Backgrounder 21/1.Google Scholar
Wouters, Jan, Coppens, Dominic and Geraets, Dylan (2011). The Influence of General Principles of Law, Working Paper No. 70, Leuven Centre for Global Governance Studies.Google Scholar
WTO (2012). Options for a Technology Facilitation Mechanism, Rio +20 – WTO Secretariat Contribution Regarding ‘A Facilitation Mechanism That Promotes the Development, Transfer and Dissemination of Clean and Environmentally Sound Technologies’, available at https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/index.php?page=view&type=111&nr=1243&menu=35.Google Scholar
Yamane, Hiroko (2014). Competition Analyses of Licensing Agreements: Considerations for Developing Countries under TRIPS, Discussion Paper, ICTSD Innovation, Technology and Intellectual Property, Geneva: ICTSD.Google Scholar
Buxbaum, A. Peter, Climate Change, Patent Pending, International Relations and Security Network (ISN ETH Zurich). 25 June 2009, available at www.isn.ethz.ch/DigitalLibrary/Articles/Detail//?ots591=4888CAA0-B3DB-1461-98B9-E20E7B9C13D4&lng=en&id=102425.Google Scholar
Charges for the Use of Intellectual Property, payments (BoP, current US dollars). World Development Indicators, the World Bank, available at http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/BM.GSR.ROYL.CD.Google Scholar
Akoi, Chizuru, GEF Actions on Technology Transfer, www.thegef.org/gef/greenline/Nov10/3.html.Google Scholar
Climate Change Centre and Network (2016). Countries Pledge Millions for Technology Transfer to Implement Paris Agreement, 16 November, available at www.ctc-n.org/news/countries-pledge-millions-technology-transfer-implement-paris-agreementGoogle Scholar
Correa, Carlos M. (2012). Proliferation of Patents Hurts Public Interest, IDN-InDepth News Viewpoint, 26 July, available at www.indepthnews.info/index.php/global-issues/1065-proliferation-of-patents-hurts-public-interest.Google Scholar
European Commission (Directorate General Competition). Pharma Sector Inquiry-Main Issues Investigated, Human Rights in Patient Care, available at http://cop.health rights.org/files/5/f/5f178d13295196c05775461875566c4e.pdf.Google Scholar
GEF, What Is the GEF? available at www.thegef.org/gef/whatisgef.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Keith, Clean Energy Boom Sets Stage for IP Wars, Law 360, New York, 30 October 2013, available at www.morganlewis.com/pubs/Law360_CleanEnergyPatentBoom_30oct13.pdf.Google Scholar
ICTSD (2012). UNFCCC Technology Executive Committee Seeks More ‘Clarity’ on IPRs, 22 November, Biores, Vol. 6, No. 4.Google Scholar
International Energy Agency, Prospect of Limiting the Global Increase in Temperature to 2ºC Is Getting Bleaker, 30 May 2011, available at www.iea.org/journalists/latestinformation.asp.Google Scholar
Lane, Eric, New Alliance’s Big IDEA: Strong IP Is Essential for Green Innovation, Green Patent Blog, 17 May 2009, available at www.greenpatentblog.com/2009/05/17/new-alliances-big-idea-strong-ip-is-essential-for-green-innovation/.Google Scholar
Macguire, Eoghan, 12 June 2012, Who’s Funding the Green Energy Revolution? CNN, available at http://edition.cnn.com/2012/06/12/world/renewables-finance-unep.Google Scholar
Ministerial Conferences, WTO website, available at www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/minist_e/minist_e.htm.Google Scholar
OECD Patent Databases, Innovation in Science, Technology and Industry, OECD website, available at www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentdatabases.htm.Google Scholar
Patents by Technology: Patents in Environment-related Technologies, OECD. Stat Extracts, available at http://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?queryid=29068.Google Scholar
Raman, Meena (2009). Wide North-South Divide Over IPRs and Climate Technologies, Bonn News Update No. 13, 9 June.Google Scholar
Ramanathan, K. (2011). An Overview of Technology Transfer and Technology Transfer Models, 5 Apr 2011, available at www.businessasia.net/Pdf_Pages/Guidebook%20on%20Technology%20Transfer%20Mechanisms/An%20overview%20of%20TT%20and%20TT%20Models.pdf.Google Scholar
Rogers, Simon and Evans, Lisa (2011). World Carbon Dioxide Emissions Data by Country: China Speeds Ahead of the Rest, The Guardian, 31 January, available at www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2011/jan/31/world-carbon-dioxide-emissions-country-data-co2.Google Scholar
Saez, Catherine (2010). UN Climate Talks Find Make-Do Solution; IP Rights Dismissed, Intellectual Property Watch, 14 December.Google Scholar
Saez, Catherine (2013). Green Innovations, Owned by Developed Countries, Tied Up in Patents, Expert Says, Intellectual Property Watch, 14 October.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Tessa and Niyogi, Tierney Sarah (2009). Technology Transfer and Intellectual Property Issues Take Centre Stage in UNFCCC Negotiations, Cleantech Update.Google Scholar
Shashikant, Sangeeta and Khor, Martin (2010). Intellectual Property and Technology Transfer Issues in the Context of Climate Change, Jutaprint. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ‘Intellectual Property’, available at http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/intellectual-property/Google Scholar
Telecommunications Services, WTO website, available at www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/serv_e/telecom_e/telecom_e.htmGoogle Scholar
Topal, Claire (2014). The Globalization of China’s Life Sciences Industry: Flashpoints in Sino-U.S. Trade Relations: An Interview with Ka Zeng, The National Bureau of Asian Research, available at www.nbr.org/research/activity.aspx?id=413.Google Scholar
U.S. Chamber of Commerce, Companies Launch Coalition to Defend IPR in Climate Change Talks, 22 May 2009, available at www.theglobalipcenter.com/companies-launch-coalition-defend-ipr-climate-change-talks/.Google Scholar
UNFCCC Secretariat, Governments Agree the Negotiating Text for the Paris Climate Agreement, Spirit of Lima Transforms into Spirit of Geneva En Route to December Climate Conference, Press Release, 13 February 2015.Google Scholar
UNFCCC website, available at http://unfccc.int.Google Scholar
Vadim, Kotelnikov, Environmentally Sound Technologies (ESTs). Ten3, http://it4b.icsti.su/1000ventures_e/environment/est_main.htmlGoogle Scholar
Vidal, John, Copenhagen Climate Summit in Disarray after “Danish Text?” Leak, The Guardian, 9 December 2009.Google Scholar
WIPO (2013). Refusals to License IP Rights – A Comparative Note on Possible Approaches, prepared by the Secretariat, available at www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/ipcompetition/en/studies/refusals_license_IPRs.pdf.Google Scholar
WIPO (2013). WIPO GREEN: New Online Marketplace Seeks Environmentally Sustainable Solutions for Climate Change, PR/2013/749, available at www.wipo.int/pressroom/en/articles/2013/article_0025.html.Google Scholar
WIPO, Advice on Flexibilities under the TRIPS Agreement, available at www.wipo.int/ipdevelopment/en/legislative_assistance/advice_trips.html.Google Scholar
WIPO, Questionnaire on Exceptions and Limitations to Patent Rights: Tables and Links to the Replies Received from Member States and Regional Offices to the SCP, available at www.wipo.int/scp/en/exceptions/.Google Scholar
WIPO, WIPO Treaties – General Information, available at www.wipo.int/treaties/en/general/.Google Scholar
WIPO, WIPO’s Contribution to Meeting the Challenges of Climate Change, available at www.wipo.int/about-wipo/en/climate_change_conf_09.html.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization, The Committee on Trade and Environment (“regular” CTE), available at www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/envir_e/wrk_committee_e.htmGoogle Scholar
World Trade Organization, Sustainable Development, available at www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/envir_e/sust_dev_e.htmGoogle Scholar
WTO (2005). Members OK amendment to make health flexibility permanent, Press/426, 6 December, available at www.wto.org/english/news_e/pres05_e/pr426_e.htmGoogle Scholar
WTO (2007). Patents and Health: WTO Receives First Notification Under “Paragraph 6” System, TRIPS and Public Health, available at www.wto.org/english/news_e/news07_e/public_health_july07_e.htmGoogle Scholar
WTO, The Separate Declaration Explained, available at www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/trips_e/healthdeclexpln_e.htmGoogle Scholar
WTO, Under TRIPS, What Are Member Governments’ Obligations on Pharmaceutical Patents? available at www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/trips_e/factsheet_pharm02_e.htm.Google Scholar
WTO, What Are Intellectual Property Rights? available at www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/trips_e/intel1_e.htm.Google Scholar
American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, 5th edn.Google Scholar
Dictionary.com. Collins English Dictionary – Complete and Unabridged 10th Edition. HarperCollins Publishers.Google Scholar
Dictionary.com. Dictionary.com Unabridged. Random House.Google Scholar
Shorter Oxford English Dictionary, 6th edn, vol. 2, Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Wei Zhuang
  • Book: Intellectual Property Rights and Climate Change
  • Online publication: 03 July 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316662892.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Wei Zhuang
  • Book: Intellectual Property Rights and Climate Change
  • Online publication: 03 July 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316662892.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Wei Zhuang
  • Book: Intellectual Property Rights and Climate Change
  • Online publication: 03 July 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316662892.011
Available formats
×