Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T05:14:54.862Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Instrumental variables and nonspherical disturbances

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2013

Roger J. Bowden
Affiliation:
University of Western Australia, Perth
Darrell A. Turkington
Affiliation:
University of Western Australia, Perth
Get access

Summary

Introduction

In presenting the basic theory of instrumental variables estimation, we assumed that the error structure was spherical; that is, the disturbance terms ut have a common distribution with variance σ2 (homoscedasticity) and are also serially uncorrelated in the sense that ɛut ut-r = 0 for r≠0. Expository convenience aside, certain models do indeed fall into such a framework, and we discussed the errors-in-variables structure as an example. However, the sphericality assumption is less satisfactory in other contexts. Indeed, in some instances, the very necessity for an IV approach arises out of a nonspherical error structure. In the present chapter we shall explore some of the implications of nonsphericality in the disturbances, utilizing for the purpose models taken from time series analysis that involve serial correlation and a class of models exhibiting heteroscedasticity.

We commence with a general discussion of different definitions of the IV estimator where the error distribution is nonspherical; specifically, the covariance of the disturbance vector is a nondiagonal matrix of constants. We have already touched on this context in Section 1.2, where the estimator (1.26) associated with the minimand (1.25a) was suggested as appropriate for the nonspherical case. We shall, in the present chapter, further explore the nature and properties of this estimator. Initially, however, we shall find it profitable to take a rather different route to its derivation, for by doing so a second type of estimator is suggested. We are able to generate two generic kinds of estimator, the one interpretable as an ordinary least-squares analog, the other as an Aitken analog. The efficiency comparison of these two approaches is explored.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×