Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-21T07:34:22.447Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - The Legislature: Institutional Strengthening in Dominant-Party States

from Part IV - Countervailing Institutions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2018

Michaela Collord
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Nic Cheeseman
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

African legislatures are typically viewed as pliant and docile bodies, the quintessential ‘rubber stamp’ institution. They have, consequently, been largely neglected in the study of African politics while the executive has remained the primary preoccupation of researchers. This trend reflects the enduring legacy of neo-patrimonial theory, with its emphasis on presidential patronage politics, as the lens through which much of the literature views the continent (Chapter 1). Even after the ‘third wave’ of democratisation brought new political openings, scholars gravitated towards the study of elections – deemed critical in securing democratic gains – while largely ignoring parliament, a mere ‘sideshow’ according to some (van de Walle 2003).

Yet, the stereotype of the irrelevant ‘rubber stamp’ legislature appears increasingly divorced from the various instances of legislative activism recurring across the continent. In this vein, the Ugandan legislature threatened a government shutdown over an unsatisfactory health budget; the Tanzania parliament forced seven Cabinet reshuffles over the space of two presidential terms; and South African MPs from the Economic Freedom Fighters party captivated TV audiences nationwide by repeatedly calling President Jacob Zuma a thief in response to allegations of corruption. This legislative assertiveness has brought fresh scholarly interest in African parliaments. This is also being driven by normative concerns, as scholars take note of the broader comparative literature, which contends that robust parliaments promote both stronger democracies (Fish 2006) and improved development outcomes through greater executive accountability (Santiso 2005). Out of this growing interest, a new research agenda is beginning to materialise, namely to explain variation in legislative institutional development across African states, its causes and consequences.

The emerging literature has not advanced very far. While it has improved our empirical knowledge of how African parliaments operate, theoretical advances remain minimal. A key issue is the tendency to focus on individual factors that influence institutional development across a range of disparate case studies. There is little sense of how these various factors and case studies relate, or what they contribute to our cumulative understanding of legislative strengthening. The most influential contribution to date, Joel Barkan's edited volume from 2009, presents itself as the ‘first comparative effort at theorizing about the process of legislative development on the continent’ (Barkan 2009: 5–6). The book offers many valuable insights; yet, even so, the analysis remains focused on the proximate triggers of legislative development and says less about underlying structural causes.

Type
Chapter
Information
Institutions and Democracy in Africa
How the Rules of the Game Shape Political Developments
, pp. 281 - 303
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Babeiya, Edwin. 2011. ‘Electoral corruption and the politics of elections financing in Tanzania’, Journal of Politics and Law 4, 2: 91–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkan, Joel. 1979. ‘Bringing home the pork: Legislator behavior, rural development, and political change in East Africa’ in Smith, Joel and Musolf, Lloyd (eds.), Legislatures in development, Durham, NC: Duke University Press: 265–288.Google Scholar
Barkan, Joel. 2013. ‘Emerging legislatures’ in Cheeseman, Nic, Anderson, Dave and Scheibler, Andrea (eds.), Routledge handbook of African politics, London: Routledge: 252–264.Google Scholar
Barkan, Joel. 2009. Legislative Power in emerging African democracies, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Barkan, Joel. 1984.‘Legislators, elections, and political linkage’ in Barkan, Joel (ed.), Politics and public policy in Kenya and Tanzania, London: Praeger Publishers: 71–102.Google Scholar
Barkan, Joel, and Matiangi, Fred. 2009.‘Kenya's torturous path to successful legislative development’ in Barkan, Joel (ed.), Legislative power in emerging African democracies, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner: 33–72.Google Scholar
Barkan, Joel, and Okumu, John. 1980. ‘Linkage without parties: Legislators and constituents in Kenya’ in Lawson, Kay (ed.), Political parties and linkage: A comparative perspective, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press: 289–324.Google Scholar
Brierley, Sarah. 2012. ‘Party unity and presidential dominance: Parliamentary development in the Fourth Republic of Ghana’, Journal of Contemporary African Studies 30, 3: 419–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheeseman, Nic. 2006.‘The rise and fall of civil-authoritarianism in Africa: Patronage, participation, and political parties in Kenya and Zambia’, University of Oxford PhD thesis.
Cooksey, Brian. 2011. Public goods, rents and business in Tanzania, London: Overseas Development Institute, 1–115, accessed 15 September 2017. www.institutions-africa.org/filestream/20130724-public-goods-rents-and-business-in-tanzania.Google Scholar
Fish, M. Steven. 2006.‘Stronger legislatures, stronger democracies’, Journal of Democracy 17, 1: 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fish, Steven, and Kroenig, Matthew. 2009.The handbook of national legislatures: A global survey, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gertzel, Cherry J. 1970. The politics of independent Kenya, 1963–8, Nairobi: East African Publishing House.Google Scholar
Gray, Hazel. 2015.‘The political economy of grand corruption in Tanzania’, African Affairs 114, 456: 382–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmquist, Frank. 1984. ‘Class structure, peasant participation, and rural self-help’, in Barkan, Joel (ed.), Politics and public policy in Kenya and Tanzania, London: Praeger Publishers: 171–198.Google Scholar
Hopkins, R.F. 1970. ‘The role of the MP in Tanzania.’ The American Political Science Review 64, 3: 762–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyden, Goran. 1999. ‘Top-down democratisation in Tanzania’, Journal of Democracy 10, 4: 142–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyden, Goran, and Leys, Colin. 1972. ‘Elections and politics in single-party systems: The case of Kenya and Tanzania’, British Journal of Political Science 2, 4: 389–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasfir, Nelson, and Twebaze, Stephen Hippo. 2009. ‘The rise and ebb of Uganda's no-party parliament’ in Barkan, Joel (ed.), Legislative power in emerging African democracies, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner: 73–108.Google Scholar
Kelsall, Tim. 2003. ‘Governance, democracy and recent political struggles in mainland Tanzania’, Commonwealth & Comparative Politics 41, 2: 55–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelsall, Tim. 2002.‘Shop windows and smoke-filled rooms: Governance and the re-politicisation of Tanzania’, The Journal of Modern African Studies 40, 4: 597–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, Mushtaq. 2010.‘Political settlements and the governance of growth-enhancing institutions’, SOAS Research [Online].
Killian, Bernadeta. 2004. ‘Comparing performances: The 1990–1995 single-party parliament and the 1995–200 multi-party parliament’, in Mukandala, R.S., Mushi, S.S. and Rubagumya, C., People's representatives: Theory and practice of parliamentary democracy in Tanzania, Kampala: Fountain Publishers Ltd., 183–200.Google Scholar
Kjekshus, Helge. 1974. ‘Parliament in a one-party state – the Bunge of Tanzania, 1965–1970’, The Journal of Modern African Studies 12, 1: 19–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindberg, Staffan. 2009. ‘Member of the Parliament of Ghana: A Hybrid Institution with Mixed Effects’, Africa Power and Politics Programme No. 2.
Lindberg, S., and Zhou, Y.. 2009.‘Co-optation despite democratisation in Ghana’, in Barkan, Joel (ed.), Legislative power in emerging African democracies, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers: 147–175.Google Scholar
Martin, Denis-Constant. 1988. Tanzanie: L'Invention d'une culture politique, Paris: Karthala Editions.Google Scholar
Mmuya, Maximilian. 1998. Tanzania: Political reform in eclipse: Crisis and cleavage in political parties, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.Google Scholar
Morgenstern, Scott, and Nacif, Benito. 2002. Legislative politics in Latin America, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Msekwa, Pius. 2012. The story of the Tanzania parliament, self-published.Google Scholar
Nijzink, Lia, Mozaffar, Shaheen, and Azevedo, Elisabete. 2006. ‘Parliaments and the enhancement of democracy on the African continent: An analysis of institutional capacity and public perception’, The Journal of Legislative Studies 12, 3–4: 311–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyirabu, Mohabe. 2002. ‘The multiparty reform process in Tanzania: The dominance of the ruling party’, The African Journal of Political Science 7, 2: 99–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Opalo, Kennedy. 2015. ‘Institutions and Political Change: The Case of African Legislatures’, Stanford University.
Salih, Mohamed. 2005. African parliaments: Between Governance and Government, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santiso, Carlos. 2005. ‘Budget Institutions and Fiscal Responsibility: Parliaments and the Political Economy of the Budget Process in Latin America’, World Bank Institute.
Scott, James. 1972. ‘Patron-client politics and political change in Southeast Asia’, The American Political Science Review 66, 1: 91–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squire, Peverill. 1992. ‘The theory of legislative institutionalization and the California Assembly’, The Journal of Politics 54, 4: 1026–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor-Robinson, Michelle. 2006. ‘The Difficult Road from Caudillismo to Democracy: The Impact of Clientelism in Honduras’ in Helmke, Gretchen and Levitsky, Steven (eds.), Informal Institutions and Democracy: Lessons from Latin America, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press: 106–124.Google Scholar
Tordoff, William. 1977. ‘Residual legislatures: The cases of Tanzania and Zambia’, Journal of Commonwealth and Comparative Politics 15, 3: 235–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tripp, Aili Mari. 1997. Changing the rules: the politics of liberalization and the urban informal economy in Tanzania, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Tsubura, Machiko. 2014. ‘Accountability and clientelism in dominant party politics: The case of a constituency development fund in Tanzania’, University of Sussex.
van de Walle, Nicholas. 2003. ‘Presidentialism and clientelism in Africa's emerging party systems’, The Journal of Modern African Studies 41, 2: 297–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Velzen, H.U.E., and Sterkenburg, J.J.. 1972. ‘The Party Supreme’ in Cliffe, Lionel and Saul, John (eds.), Socialism in Tanzania, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: East African Publishing House: 257–264.Google Scholar
Van Vliet, Martin. 2014. ‘Weak legislatures, failing mps, and the collapse of democracy in Mali’, African Affairs 113, 450: 45–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weghorst, Keith. 2015. ‘Legislative candidacy in electoral authoritarian regimes: Evidence from Tanzania’, Chr. Micheleson Institute[Online].
Whitfield, Lindsay, Therkildsen, Ole, Burr, Lars, and Kjaer, Anne Mette. 2015. The politics of African industrial policy: A comparative perspective, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×