Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-15T05:18:52.673Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Institutional “dirty” work: preserving institutions through strategic decoupling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2009

By
Paul M. Hirsch  and
Y. Sekou Bermiss
Edited by
Thomas B. Lawrence ,
Roy Suddaby  and
Bernard Leca
Thomas B. Lawrence
Affiliation:
Simon Fraser University, British Columbia
Roy Suddaby
Affiliation:
University of Alberta
Bernard Leca
Affiliation:
ESC Rouen
Get access

Summary

[The field has paid] insufficient attention to those actors who are able somehow to compromise, avoid or defy systems of institutional control or episodes of interested agency.

(Lawrence, 2008: 189)

Draw attention to behind the scenes, to the actors, writers, and stage-hands that produce them.

(Lawrence & Suddaby, 2006: 249)

Introduction

Two key aspects of institutional work are the entrepreneurship which accompanies the rise of new institutions and the decline which occurs as they move toward deinstitutionalization. As Lawrence and Suddaby (2006) note, studies of each are often separated from each other, as well as from studies of institutions that are in place and being maintained. Their important insight, in calling for a greater integration of work on the creation, maintenance, and decline of institutions is significant, for empirically the creation of new institutions often intersects with existing institutions which are still powerful, as well as those already on their way out. Integrating them in our studies expands the organizational fields to examine, opening up more networks of organizations and purposive actors working to preserve, alter, or replace an institution. These dynamics and the mechanisms they entail focus more attention on the processes and actions involved as institutions undergo changes throughout their life cycles.

In this chapter, we highlight two important areas of institutional study. First, we build upon Lawrence and Suddaby's framework, highlighting the work of institutional preservation, a distinct component of institutional work that is most pertinent in the stage between the disruption of incumbent institutions and the creation of nascent institutions.

Type
Chapter
Information
Institutional Work
Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organizations
 , pp. 262 - 283
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldrich, H. (1999) The evolutionary approach. In Organizations Evolving, pp. 20–41. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Astley, W. G. (1985) The two ecologies: population and community perspectives on organizational evolution. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30(2): 224–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barley, S. R. (2007) Corporations, democracy, and the public good. Journal of Management Inquiry, 16(3): 201–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, W. P. (1990) The organizational ecology of a technological system. Administrative Science Quarterly, special issue on Technology, Organizations, and Innovation, 35(1): 31–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bealing, W. E., Dirsmith, M. W. & Fogarty, T. (1996) Early regulatory actions by the SEC: an institutional theory perspective on the dramaturgy of political exchanges. Accounting Organizations and Society, 21(4): 317–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benacek, V. (1995) Small businesses and private entrepreneurship during transition – the case of the Czech Republic. Eastern European Economics, 33(2): 38–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beverland, M. & Luxton, S. (2005) Managing integrated marketing communication (IMC) through strategic decoupling – how luxury wine firms retain brand leadership while appearing to be wedded to the past. Journal of Advertising, 34(4): 103–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr-Saunders, A. M. & Wilson, P. A. (1933) The Professions. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Dacin, M. T. (1997) Isomorphism in context: the power and prescription of institutional norms. Academy of Management Journal, 40(1): 46–81.Google Scholar
Delucchi, M. (2000) Staking a claim: the decoupling of liberal arts mission statements from baccalaureate degrees awarded in higher education. Sociological Inquiry, 70(2): 157–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiMaggio, P. & Powell, W. W. (eds.) (1991) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Dlouhy, V. & Mladek, J. (1994) Privatization and corporate control in the Czech Republic. Economic Policy, 9(19): 155–170. (Supplement: Lessons for Reform.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eccles, R. G. & Nohria, N. (1992) Beyond the Hype: Rediscovering the Essence of Management. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Elsbach, K. D. (1994) Managing organizational legitimacy in the California cattle industry – the construction and effectiveness of verbal accounts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(1): 57–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsbach, K. D. & Sutton, R. I. (1992) Acquiring organizational legitimacy through illegitimate actions: a marriage of institutional and impression management theories. Academy of Management Journal, 35(4): 699–738.Google Scholar
Fiss, P. C. & Zajac, E. J. (2006) The symbolic management of strategic change: sensegiving via framing and decoupling. Academy of Management Journal, 49(6): 1173–1193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox-Wolfgramm, S. J., Boal, K. B. & Hunt, J. G. (1998) Organizational adaptation to institutional change: a comparative study of first-order change in prospector and defender banks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(1): 40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedland, R. & Alford, R. (1991) Bringing society back in: symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In Powell, W. W. & DiMaggio, P. (eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, pp. 223–262. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Greenhouse, S. (1991) Czechs begin shift to a free market. New York Times, p. 1.3.Google Scholar
Han, S. K. (1994) Mimetic isomorphism and its effect on the audit services market. Social Forces, 73(2): 637–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanley, S. (2002) Party institutionalization and centre-right Euroscepticism in East Central Europe: the case of the Civic Democratic Party in the Czech Republic. Paper presented at the 29th ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, Turin.
Hinings, C. R. & Greenwood, R. (2002) ASQ Forum: disconnects and consequences in organizational theory?Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(3): 411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, P. M. & Rao, H. (2003) The Schweik syndrome: the narrative power of resistance by agreement. In Czarniawska-Joerges, B. & Gagliardi, P. (eds.), Narratives We Organise By, vol. 2, pp. 137–148. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Holm, P. (1995) The dynamics of institutionalization: transformation processes in Norwegian fisheries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(3): 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korn, H. J. & Baum, J. A. C. (1994) Community ecology and employment dynamics: a study of large Canadian organizations, 1985–1992. Social Forces, 73(1): 1–31.Google Scholar
Kraatz, M. S. & Zajac, E. J. (1996) Exploring the limits of the new institutionalism: the causes and consequences of illegitimate organizational change. American Sociological Review, 61: 812–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, T. B. (2008) Power, institutions and organizations. In Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Suddaby, R. & Sahlin-Andersson, K. (eds.), Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, pp. 170–197. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, T. B. & Suddaby, R. (2006) Institutions and institutional work. In Clegg, S., Hardy, C. & Lawrence, T. (eds.), Handbook of Organization Studies, 2nd edn., pp. 215–254. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. (1998) Notes from here and there. San Francisco Chronicle, p. A.12.
Lieberman, I. W. (1995) Mass Privatization in Central and Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union: A Comparative Analysis. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Lipton, D. & Sachs, J. (1990) Creating a market economy in Eastern Europe: the case of Poland. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. Washington DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Longworth, R. C. (1995) Czech leader gives U. of C. credit. Chicago Tribune, p. 31.
Lutz, F. W. (1982) Tightening up loose coupling in organizations of higher education. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27(4): 653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, G. A. (2007) Politics, power, and institution building: bank crises and supervision in East Central Europe. Review of International Political Economy: RIPE, 14(2): 220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, J. W. & Rowan, B. (1977) Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2): 340–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, J. W. & Rowan, B. (1978) The structure of educational organizations. In Meyer, M. W. (ed.), Environments and Organizations, pp. 78–109. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Meyer, M. W. & Zucker, L. G. (1989) Permanently Failing Organizations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Oliver, C. (1991) Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 6(1): 145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orton, J. D. & Weick, K. E. (1990) Loosely coupled systems: a reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 15(2): 203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, H. & Hirsch, P. (2003) “Czechmate”: the old banking elite and the construction of investment privatization funds in the Czech Republic. Socio-Economic Review, 1: 247–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, J. C. (1990) Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Stark, D. (1996) Recombinant property in East European capitalism. American Journal of Sociology, 101(4): 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, R. N. & Barley, S. R. (1996) Organizations and social systems: organization theory's neglected mandate. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1): 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, W. B. & Greenberg, D. (2000) Agency and social networks: strategies of action in a social structure of position, opposition, and opportunity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(4): 651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suchman, M. C. (1995) Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3): 571–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szelenyi, I. & Szelenyi, S. (1995) Circulation or reproduction of elites during the postcommunist transformation of Eastern Europe – introduction. Theory and Society, 24(5): 615–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, J. D. (1967) Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Verdery, K. (2003) The Vanishing Hectare: Property and Value in Postsocialist Transylvania. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, K. (2003) Does globalization lead to convergence? Unpublished PhD dissertation, Northwestern University.
Weick, K. E. (1976) Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(1): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westphal, J. D. & Zajac, E. J. (1994) Substance and symbolism in CEOs' long-term incentive plans. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(3): 367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zajac, E. J. & Westphal, J. D. (2004) The social construction of market value: institutionalization and learning perspectives on stock market reactions. American Sociological Review, 69(3): 433–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×