Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-14T19:55:58.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Building the iron cage: institutional creation work in the context of competing proto-institutions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2009

Thomas B. Lawrence
Affiliation:
Simon Fraser University, British Columbia
Roy Suddaby
Affiliation:
University of Alberta
Bernard Leca
Affiliation:
ESC Rouen
Get access

Summary

A unique contribution of institutional theory is the insight that organizations need legitimacy as well as technical efficiency to survive and thrive in their environments (DiMaggio & Powell, 1983; Meyer & Rowan, 1977). The institutionalized norms, practices, and logics which structure organizational fields exert isomorphic pressures, forming an “iron cage” which constrains organizational actions. Organizations are seen as legitimate when they conform to field structures and operate within the iron cage (DiMaggio & Powell, 1983). Much work in institutional theory has focused on the diffusion of institutional structures and the forces which support institutional isomorphism.

Yet not all institutional environments are highly institutionalized, and not all actors are equally constrained by institutional arrangements. A great deal of work in the last two decades has shown that institutional entrepreneurs may arise to question institutional arrangements (DiMaggio, 1988), resisting them strategically (Oliver, 1991; Ang & Cummings, 1997), disrupting and deinstitutionalizing them (Ahmadjian & Robinson, 2001; Oliver, 1992), and reconstructing them to suit the desires of different actors (Anand & Peterson, 2000; Hargadon & Douglas, 2001; Zilber, 2002).

Much of the prior work on institutional entrepreneurship has tended to focus retrospectively on the path of a single institutional innovation as it gained support in an emerging or existing field, often displacing an existing set of institutional arrangements (e.g. Greenwood, Suddaby & Hinings, 2002; Maguire, Hardy & Lawrence, 2004; Munir, 2005). Throughout this work, competing or independently evolving innovations which may also have been candidates for institutionalization are generally not discussed.

Type
Chapter
Information
Institutional Work
Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organizations
, pp. 143 - 177
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahmadjian, C. L. & Robinson, P. (2001) Safety in numbers: downsizing and the deinstitutionalization of permanent employment in Japan. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(4): 622–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, H. E. & Fiol, C. M. (1994) Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19(4): 645–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anand, N. & Peterson, R. A. (2000) When market information constitutes fields: sensemaking of markets in the commercial music industry. Organization Science, 11(3): 270–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ang, S. & Cummings, L. L. (1997) Strategic response to institutional influences on information systems outsourcing. Organization Science, 8(3): 235–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barley, S. R. (1986) Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(1): 78–108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beckert, J. (1999) Agency, entrepreneurs, and institutional change: the role of strategic choice and institutionalized practices in organizations. Organization Studies, 20(5): 777–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiMaggio, P. J. (1988) Interest and agency in institutional theory. In Zucker, L. (ed.), Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment, pp. 3–21. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P. J. & Powell, W. W. (1983) The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2): 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fligstein, N. (1991) The structural transformation of American industry: an institutional account of the causes of diversification in the largest firms, 1919–1979. In Powell, W. W. & DiMaggio, P. J. (eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, pp. 311–336. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fligstein, N. (2001) The Architecture of Markets: An Economic Sociology of Twenty-First-Century Capitalist Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fox-Wolfgramm, S. J., Boal, K. B. & Hunt, J. G. (1998) Organizational adaptation to institutional change: a comparative study of first-order change in prospector and defender banks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(1): 87–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, F. (2004) The consultation dilemma in private regulatory regimes: negotiating FSC regional standards in the United States and Canada. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 6(1): 57–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galvin, T. L. (2002) Examining institutional change: evidence from the founding dynamics of US health care interest associations. Academy of Management Journal, 45(4): 673–699.Google Scholar
Garud, R., Jain, S. & Kumaraswamy, A. (2002) Institutional entrepreneurship in the sponsorship of common technological standards: the case of Sun Microsystems and Java. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1): 196–214.Google Scholar
Greenwood, R. & Hinings, C. (1996) Understanding radical organizational change: bringing together the old and the new institutionalism. Academy of Management Review, 21(4): 1022–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, R. & Suddaby, R. (2006) Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: the big five accounting firms. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1): 27–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, R., Suddaby, R. & Hinings, C. R. (2002) Theorizing change: the role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1): 58–80.Google Scholar
Hargadon, A. B. & Douglas, Y. (2001) When innovations meet institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(3): 476–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hargrave, T. J. & Ven, A. H. (2006) A collective action model of institutional innovation. Academy of Management Review, 31(4): 864–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hensmans, M. (2003) Social movement organizations: a metaphor for strategic actors in institutional fields. Organization Studies, 24(3): 355–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, A. J. (1999) Institutional evolution and change: environmentalism and the US chemical industry. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4): 351–371.Google Scholar
Holm, P. (1995) The dynamics of institutionalization: transformation processes in Norwegian fisheries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(3): 398–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jepperson, R. L. (1991) Institutions, institutional effects, and institutionalism. In Powell, W. W. & DiMaggio, P. J. (eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, pp. 143–163. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jick, T. D. (1979) Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4): 602–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langley, A. (1999) Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24(4): 691–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, T. B., Hardy, C. & Phillips, N. (2002) Institutional effects of interorganizational collaboration: the emergence of proto-institutions. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1): 281–290.Google Scholar
Lawrence, T. B. & Suddaby, R. (2006) Institutions and institutional work. In Clegg, S. R., Hardy, C., Lawrence, T. B. & Nord, W. R. (eds.), Handbook of Organization Studies, 2nd edn., pp. 214–254. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Levy, D. & Scully, M. (2007) The institutional entrepreneur as modern prince: the strategic face of power in contested fields. Organization Studies, 28(7): 971–991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maguire, S., Hardy, C. & Lawrence, T. B. (2004) Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5): 657–679.Google Scholar
Marquis, C. & Lounsbury, M. (2007) Vive la résistance: competing logics and the consolidation of US community banking. Academy of Management Journal, 50(4): 799–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdam, D. & Scott, W. R. (2005) Organizations and social movements. In Davis, G., McAdam, D., Scott, W. & Zald, M. (eds.), Social Movements and Organization Theory, pp. 4–40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNichol, J. (2006) Transnational NGO certification programs as new regulatory forms: lessons from the forestry sector. In Djelic, M. L. & Sahlin-Andersson, K. (eds.), Transnational Governance: Institutional Dynamics of Regulation, pp. 349–375. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. W. & Rowan, B. (1977) Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2): 340–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1984) Analysing Qualitative Data: A Source Book for New Methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Munir, K. A. (2005) The social construction of events: a study of institutional change in the photographic field. Organization Studies, 26(1): 93–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, D. C. (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, C. (1991) Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1): 145–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, C. (1992) The antecedents of deinstitutionalization. Organization Studies, 13(4): 563–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeffer, J. & Salancik, G. R. (1978) The External Control of Organizations. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Prakash, A. & Potoski, M. (2006) The Voluntary Environmentalists: Green Clubs, ISO 14001, and Voluntary Environmental Regulations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, H., Monin, P. & Durand, R. (2003) Institutional change in Toque Ville: nouvelle cuisine as an identity movement in French gastronomy. American Journal of Sociology, 108(4): 795–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reay, T. & Hinings, C. (2005) The recomposition of an organizational field: health care in Alberta. Organization Studies, 26(3): 351–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneiberg, M. (2007) What's on the path? Path dependence, organizational diversity and the problem of institutional change in the US economy, 1900–1950. Socio-Economic Review, 5(1): 47–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, W. R. (2001) Institutions and Organizations, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Selznick, P. (1949) TVA and the Grass Roots. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Seo, M. G. & Creed, W. E. D. (2002) Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: a dialectical perspective. Academy of Management review, 27(2): 222–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suddaby, R. & Greenwood, R. (2005) Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(1): 35–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirbach, M. (2004) Footprints in the Forest: Current Practice and Future Challenges in Forest Certification. Ottawa: Sierra Club.Google Scholar
Washington, M. (2004) Field approaches to institutional change: the evolution of the National Collegiate Athletic Association 1906–1995. Organization Studies, 25(3): 393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wijen, F. & Ansari, S. (2007) Overcoming inaction through collective institutional entrepreneurship: insights from regime theory. Organization Studies, 28(7): 1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zilber, T. B. (2002) Institutionalization as an interplay between actions, meanings, and actors: the case of a rape crisis center in Israel. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1): 234–254.Google Scholar
Zucker, L. G. (1977) The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. American Sociological Review, 42(5): 726–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×