Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T23:40:46.515Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Explaining Incomes and Inequality in China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 July 2009

Yue Ximing
Affiliation:
Professor School of Finance, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China
Terry Sicular
Affiliation:
Professor of economics Department of Economics at the University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
Li Shi
Affiliation:
Professor of economics School of Economics and Business, Beijing Normal University
Björn Gustafsson
Affiliation:
Professor Department of Social Work at Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden
Björn A. Gustafsson
Affiliation:
University of Gothenberg, Sweden
Li Shi
Affiliation:
Beijing Normal University
Terry Sicular
Affiliation:
University of Western Ontario
Get access

Summary

Introduction

After the mid-1980s income inequality in China increased markedly and has now reached a level that is relatively high by international standards. Underlying this increase was China's transition from a planned to a market economy. Prior to the transition a wide array of policies and programs had depressed income differentials. Wage differentials in urban areas were compressed and based largely on seniority and the ownership classification of the enterprise. In rural areas collective farms distributed earnings in an egalitarian fashion, and income inequality was mainly the result of differences among collective farms in resource endowments. Opportunities for households and individuals to engage in private income-generating activities were severely restricted.

With economic reforms the government has allowed, if not encouraged, some people to get rich first. In urban areas wage differentials and bonuses have increased; in rural areas farming is now household-based, and income differences reflect variation in household resources, abilities, and effort. Restrictions on private economic activities have been lifted, permitting diversification in sources of income and allowing returns to entrepreneurship. Such changes have naturally contributed to greater inequality.

The transition has led not only to a higher level of inequality, but also to a change in the underlying determinants of incomes and inequality. Markets now play a much enlarged role in the determination of incomes. As the scope of markets expands, one would expect incomes, and therefore inequality, to reflect differences in underlying productive characteristics and endowments such as land and labor endowments, education, and so on.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bian, Y. and Logan, J. R. (1996), “Market Transition and the Persistence of Power: The Changing Stratification System in Urban China,” American Sociological Review, 61(5), 739–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleisher, B. M., Dong, K., and Liu, Y. (1996), “Education, Enterprise Organization, and Productivity in the Chinese Paper Industry,” Economic Development and Cultural Change, 44(3), 571–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleisher, B. M. and Wang, X. (2001), “Skill Differentials, Return to Schooling, and Market Segmentation in a Transition Economy: The Case of Mainland China,” Journal of Development Economics, 73(1), 315–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, T. P. (2000), “Membership Benefits or Selection Effects? Why Former Communist Party Members Do Better in Post-Soviet Russia,” Social Science Research, 29(1), 25–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gustafsson, B. and Li, S. (1998), “Inequality in China at the End of the '80s – Locational Aspects and Household Characteristics,” Asian Economic Journal, 12(1), 35–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gustafsson, B. and S. Li (2001), “A More Unequal China? Aspects of Inequality in the Distribution of Equivalent Income,” in C. Riskin, R.Zhao, and S.Li, , eds., China's Retreat from Equality: Income Distribution and Economic Transition, Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Heckman, J. (2003), “China's Investment in Human Capital,” Economic Development and Cultural Change, 51(4), 795–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, J. and Song, L. (1999), The Rural-Urban Divide: Economic Disparities and Interactions in China, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, J. and Song, L. (2003), “Increasing Urban Wage Inequality in China: Extent, Elements and Evaluation,” Economics of Transition, 11(4), 597–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lam, K. C. (2003), “Earnings Advantage of Party Members in Urban China,” Business Research Centre Working Paper, Hong Kong Baptist University.Google Scholar
Li, H. and Luo, Y. (2004), “Reporting Errors, Ability Heterogeneity, and Returns to Schooling in China,” Pacific Economic Review, 9(3), 191–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maurer-Fazio, M. and Dinh, N. (2004), “Differential Rewards to, and Contributions of, Education in Urban China's Segmented Labor Markets,” Pacific Economic Review, 9(3), 173–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, D. (1997), “A Household Level Study of the Determinants of Incomes and Consumption,” Economic Journal, 107(440), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morduch, J. and Sicular, T. (2000), “Politics, Growth and Inequality in Rural China: Does It Pay to Join the Party?Journal of Public Economics, 77(3), 331–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morduch, J. and Sicular, T. (2002), “Rethinking Inequality Decomposition, with Evidence from China,” Economic Journal, 112(476), 93–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shorrocks, A. F. (1982), “Inequality Decomposition by Factor Components,” Econometrica, 50(1), 193–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wan, G. (2004), “Accounting for Income Inequality in Rural China: A Regression-Based Approach,” Journal of Comparative Economics, 32(2), 348–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, J. and Zhao, Y. (2002), “Economic Returns to Education in Urban China,” unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Explaining Incomes and Inequality in China
    • By Yue Ximing, Professor School of Finance, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China, Terry Sicular, Professor of economics Department of Economics at the University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada, Li Shi, Professor of economics School of Economics and Business, Beijing Normal University, Björn Gustafsson, Professor Department of Social Work at Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden
  • Edited by Björn A. Gustafsson, Li Shi, Beijing Normal University, Terry Sicular, University of Western Ontario
  • Book: Inequality and Public Policy in China
  • Online publication: 25 July 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511510922.004
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Explaining Incomes and Inequality in China
    • By Yue Ximing, Professor School of Finance, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China, Terry Sicular, Professor of economics Department of Economics at the University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada, Li Shi, Professor of economics School of Economics and Business, Beijing Normal University, Björn Gustafsson, Professor Department of Social Work at Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden
  • Edited by Björn A. Gustafsson, Li Shi, Beijing Normal University, Terry Sicular, University of Western Ontario
  • Book: Inequality and Public Policy in China
  • Online publication: 25 July 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511510922.004
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Explaining Incomes and Inequality in China
    • By Yue Ximing, Professor School of Finance, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China, Terry Sicular, Professor of economics Department of Economics at the University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada, Li Shi, Professor of economics School of Economics and Business, Beijing Normal University, Björn Gustafsson, Professor Department of Social Work at Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden
  • Edited by Björn A. Gustafsson, Li Shi, Beijing Normal University, Terry Sicular, University of Western Ontario
  • Book: Inequality and Public Policy in China
  • Online publication: 25 July 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511510922.004
Available formats
×