Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T18:19:10.729Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Additives and impurities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2015

Alison Lewis
Affiliation:
University of Cape Town
Marcelo Seckler
Affiliation:
Universidade de São Paulo
Herman Kramer
Affiliation:
Technische Universiteit Delft, The Netherlands
Gerda van Rosmalen
Affiliation:
Technische Universiteit Delft, The Netherlands
Get access

Summary

Why this chapter is important

Although additives and impurities are often present in relatively small concentrations, even trace amounts can have a significant effect on the crystallization process as a whole. Thus, when working in “real” crystallization processes, understanding the influence of additives and impurities is very important.

Although the topic of additives and impurities has been the subject of extensive study by many different researchers, it is still a difficult area, partly because the field itself is very broad and diverse, but also because there are so many different applications in which additives and impurities play an essential role (Meenan et al., 2002, Sangwal, 2007).

Application and occurrence

For many centuries long chain organic additives with molecular weights of a few thousand daltons were used in particle formation processes as, for example, dispersants, flocculants and flotation agents. They were generally added, at dosages below 1 wt%, after the particles were formed.

However, in this chapter,we will discuss the role and design of additives and impurities that are present during crystallization at low dosages from parts per billion (ppb) to, at most, a few wt%. Highly charged metal ions can influence the crystallization process at only ppb concentrations, polymers at <1 wt% concentrations, whereas monomers must be present at the wt% level in order to have an influence.

Because of their low concentrations, additives do not influence the supersaturation (by coordination of ions in solution, for example), but only have the ability to act upon the crystal surface. Such additives are, for example, growth inhibitors, habit modifiers, anti-caking agents (applied as after-treatment) or templates for preferred nucleation.

Since impurities (i.e. additives that are unintentionally present) that can originate from the raw material, or can be formed as by-products during synthesis of the product, often have similar effects as additives on the crystallization process, they are also considered in the same chapter.

The solvent can also have similar effects on the growth kinetics and the shape of the crystals, as will be discussed.

Type
Chapter
Information
Industrial Crystallization
Fundamentals and Applications
, pp. 284 - 302
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Addadi, L. and Weiner, S. 1986. Interactions between acidic macromolecules and structured crystal surfaces: stereochemistry and biomineralisation. Molecular Crystals and Liquid Crystals, 134, 305-322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anwar, J. and Zahn, D. 2011. Uncovering molecular processes in crystal nucleation and growth by using molecular simulation. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 50, 19962013.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bar-Dolev, M., Celik, Y., Wettlaufer, J. S., Davies, P. L. and Braslavsky, I. 2012. New insights into ice growth and melting modifications by antifreeze proteins. Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 9, 3249–3259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bode, A. A. C., Jiang, S.Meijer, J. A. M., van Enckevort, W. J. P. and Vlieg, E. 2012. Growth inhibition of sodium chloride crystals by anticacking agents: in situ observation of step pinning. Crystal Growth and Design, 12(12), 5889–5896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buller, R., Peterson, M. L., Almarsson, Ö. and Leiserowitz, L. 2002. Quinoline binding site on malaria pigment crystal: a rational pathway for antimalaria drug design. Crystal Growth and Design, 2, 553-562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, J., Wang, J., Ulrich, J., Yin, Q. and Xue, L. 2008. Effect of solvent on the crystal structure and habit of hydrocortisone. Crystal Growth and Design, 8(5), 1490–1494.Google Scholar
Davey, R., Fila, W. and Garside, J. 1986. The influence of biuret on the growth kinetics of urea crystals from aqueous solutions. Journal of Crystal Growth, 79(1), 607–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernández-Diaz, L., Astilleros, J. M. and Pina, C. M. 2006. The morphology of calcite crystals grown in a porous medium doped with divalent cations. Chemical Geology, 225, 314-321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, R. B., Ramachandran, V and Roberts, K. J. 2011. Molecular modelling of the incorpo-ration of habit modifying additives: a-glycine in the presence of Lalanine. Crystal Engineering Communications, 13(15), 4935–4944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hottenhuis, M. and Lucasius, C. 1986. The influence of impurities on crystal growth; In situ observation of the {0 1 0} face of potassium hydrogen phthalate. Journal of Crystal Growth, 78, 379-388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawska, A., Hochrein, O., Brickmann, J., Kniep, R. and Zahn, D. 2008. The nucleation mechanism of fluorapatite-collagen composites: ion association and motif control by collagen proteins. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 47, 4982-4985.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lahav, M. and Leiserowitz, L. 2001. The effect of solvent on crystal growth and morphology. Chemical Engineering Science, 56(7), 2245–2253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landau, E. M., Wolf, S. G., Levenon, M. et al. 1989. Stereochemical studies in crystal nucleation: oriented crystal growth of glycine at interfaces covered with Langmuir and Langmuir-Blodgett films of resolved alpha-amino acids. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 111, 14361445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, S., Heywood, B. R., Rajam, S. and Birchall, J. D. 1988. Controlled crystallization of CaCO3 under stearic acid. Nature, 334, 692-695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, S. 2000. The chemistry of form. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 39, 33923406.Google ScholarPubMed
Martynowicz, E. T. M. J., Liao, L., Witkamp, G.-J. and Van Rosmalen, G. M. 1996. The influence of aluminium fluoride in hemi-dihydrate phosphoric acid processes. Hydrometallurgy, 41, 155170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meenan, P. A., Anderson, S. R. and Klug, D. L. 2002. The influence of impurities and solvents on crystallization. In Handbook of Industrial Crystallization, 2nd edn., Allan, S. M. (ed.), Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
Ntuli, F. and Lewis, A. E. 2007. The influence of iron on the precipitation behaviour of nickel powder. Chemical Engineering Science, 62, 3756-3766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salvalaglio, M., Vetter, T., Mazzotti, M. and Parrinello, M. 2013. Controlling and predicting crystal shapes: the case of urea. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 52, 13369-13372.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sangwal, K. 2007. Additives and Crystallization Processes: From Fundamentals to Applications, John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanrikulu, S. Ü., Eroglu, I., Bulutcu, A. N. and Ozkar, S. 2000. Crystallization kinetics of ammo-nium perchlorate in MSMPR crystallizer. Journal of Crystal Growth, 208, 533-540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trivedi, T. J., Pandya, P. and Kumar, A. 2013. Effect of organic additives on the solubility behavior and morphology of calcium sulfate dihydrate (gypsum) in the aqueous sodium chloride system and physicochemical solution properties at 35 °C. Journal of Chemical Engineering Data, 58, 773-779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Leeden, C., Kashchiev, D. and van Rosmalen, G. M. 1993. Effect of additives on nucleation rate, crystal growth rate and induction time in precipitation. Journal of Crystal Growth, 130, 221-232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visser, R. A. 1983. Crystal Growth Kinetics of alpha-lactose hydrate, PhD Thesis, University of Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Weissbuch, I., Addadi, L. and Leiserowitz, L. 1991. Molecular recognition at crystal interfaces. Science, 253, 637-645.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weissbuch, I. and Lahav, M. 2011. Crystalline architectures as templates of relevance to the origins of homochirality. Chemical Reviews, 111, 3236-3267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×