Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T12:37:23.047Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Romanticism as literary Idealism, or: a 200-year-old way of talking about literature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2013

Stefan Matuschek
Affiliation:
Friedrich Schiller University of Jena
Nicholas Boyle
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Liz Disley
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Christoph Jamme
Affiliation:
Leuphana Universität Lüneburg, Germany
Ian Cooper
Affiliation:
University of Kent, Canterbury
Get access

Summary

Those who sat in the main auditorium of the University of Göttingen on 8 and 9 November 2006 heard the following from the internationally renowned German author Daniel Kehlmann: ‘There is no professionalism in writing…Don't believe what any professor of poetry says.’ Even though Kehlmann uttered these words in the role of a poetry professor, the message cannot have surprised his audience. The view that authorship is not just something to be learned and executed in accordance with rules, is very well established. Indeed, Kehlmann would have surprised his audience much more if, without further ado, he had taken on the role of a poetry professor, and set out to explain and teach in a straightforwardly comprehensible way how to do literature. Questions about literature as Art point us to a realm way beyond the technical demands of its production; it has entirely disconnected itself from the perspective of such an aesthetic. On what, then, has it oriented itself instead? There were no surprises in the received wisdom to be heard from Kehlmann in the Göttingen auditorium. Formal perfection, he said, does not suffice for literature. Rather, there must ‘be an element of existential truth, a touching upon foundational facts of our existence. [Literature] must say something about us as human beings.’ Moreover, human beings are actually dependent on literature saying something to them as Art, for, as Kehlmann notes, a world in which art plays no role is ‘actually inhumane’. Where the author speaks about his own métier – Kehlmann's remarks were made under the title ‘lectures on poetics’ – he speaks in a wholly non-technical manner about the fundamental questions of humanity. Where he ought to be giving information as a representative of his craft, he denies any particular professionalism and slides off instead into general philosophy of art. The author who was supposed to be explaining his métier undergoes a metamorphosis into a philosopher who speaks of literature as a fundamental issue of humanity.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Impact of Idealism
The Legacy of Post-Kantian German Thought
, pp. 69 - 91
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kehlmann, Daniel, Diese sehr ernsten Scherze. Poetikvorlesungen (Göttingen: Wallstein, 2007), 5Google Scholar
Mandelkow, Karl-Robert (ed.), Goethes Briefe. Hamburger Ausgabe in 4 Bänden, iv (Munich: Beck, 1976), 481
Adorno, Theodor W., Ästhetische Theorie, eds. Adorno, Gretel and Tiedemann, Rolf (Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, 1973), 216.Google Scholar
Schiller, Friedrich, Gedichte, ed. Kurscheidt, Georg (Frankfurt a.M.: Deutscher Klassiker, 1992), 152–6Google Scholar
Gottsched, Johann Christoph, Versuch einer Critischen Dichtkunst, vierte sehr vermehrte Auflage, Leipzig 1751 (reprinted Darmstadt, 1962), 67Google Scholar
Sulzer, Johann Georg, Allgemeine Theorie der Schönen Künste, Theil, Erster (Leipzig: Weidemanns Erben & Reich, 1773), 344fGoogle Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich, Charakteristiken und Kritiken I (1796–1801), ed. Eichner, Hans, Friedrich-Schlegel-Ausgabe, Kritische, vol. 2 (Munich: Schöningh, 1967), 162Google Scholar
Schlegel, F., Charakteristiken und Kritiken II (1802–1829), ed. Eichner, Hans, Friedrich-Schlegel-Ausgabe, Kritische, vol. 3 (Munich: Schöningh, 1975), 50Google Scholar
Der Freimüthige oder Ernst und Scherz, No. 113 (Berlin: Frölich, 7 June 1804), 449
Hederich, Benjamin, Gründliches mythologisches Lexikon (Leipzig, 1770; reprinted Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1996), xiGoogle Scholar
Lehrerin der, Menschheit.’ Mythologie der Vernunft. Hegels, ältestes Systemprogramm‘ des deutschen Idealismus, eds. Jamme, Christoph and Schneider, Helmut (Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, 1984), 13Google Scholar
Novalis, , Schriften, eds. Samuel, Richard, Mähl, Hans-Joachim and Schulz, Gerhard (Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1981), II, 672Google Scholar
Kehlmann, Daniel, Die Vermessung der Welt (Reinbek: Rowohlt, 2005), 19Google Scholar
Schiller, Friedrich, Theoretische Schriften, eds. Janz, Rolf-Peter, Brittnacher, Hans Richard, Kleiner, Gerd and Störmer, Fabian (Frankfurt a.M.: Deutscher Klassiker, 1992), 492Google Scholar
, F. S., Charakteristiken und Kritiken i (1796–1801), ed. Eichner, Hans (Munich: Schöningh, 1967), 198Google Scholar
Humboldt, Wilhelm von, Werke in fünf Bänden, vol. 2: Schriften zur Altertumskunde und Ästhetik. Die Vasken, eds. Flitner, Andreas and Giel, Klaus, 4th edn (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1986), 357–95Google Scholar
Schiller, , ‘Kallias, oder über die Schönheit’, Theoretische Schriften, eds. Janz, Rolf-Peter, Brittnacher, Hans Richard, Kleiner, Gerd and Störmer, Fabian (Frankfurt a.M.: Deutscher Klassiker, 1992), 276–329Google Scholar
Safranski, Rüdiger, Schiller oder die Erfindung des Deutschen Idealismus (Munich: Carl Hanser, 2004)Google Scholar
Schlegel, , Charakteristiken und Kritiken ii (1802–1829), ed. Eichner, Hans, Friedrich-Schlegel-Ausgabe, Kritische, vol. 3 (Munich: Schöningh, 1975), 56Google Scholar
Lacoue-Labarthe, Philippe and Nancy, Jean-Luc (eds.) (in collaboration with Anne-Marie Lang), L’Absolu littéraire. Théorie de la littérature du romantisme allemand (Paris : Seuil, 1978), 27
Derrida, Jacques, De la grammatologie (Paris: Éditions de Minuit, 1967)Google Scholar
Erbauung, und kritische’, Athenäum. Jahrbuch für Romantik (1996), 197–206

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×