Abikoff, W. and Harvey, W., “Extremal Kleinian groups”, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 140 (2012), 267–278.Google Scholar

Abikoff, W. and Maskit, B., “Geometric decompositions of Kleinian groups”, Amer. J. Math. 99:4 (1977), 687–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abikoff, W., Earle, C. J. and Mitra, S., “Barycentric extensions of monotone maps of the circle”, pp. 1–20 in In the tradition of Ahlfors and Bers, III Contemp. Math., 355, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2004.Google Scholar

Accola, R. D. M., “Invariant domains for Kleinian groups”, Amer. J. Math. 88 (1966), 329–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adams, C. C., “The noncompact hyperbolic 3-manifold of minimal volume”, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 100:4 (1987), 601–606.Google Scholar

Agard, S., “Distortion theorems for quasiconformal mappings”, Ann. Acad. Sci. Fennicae Series A 423 (1968).Google Scholar

Agol, I., “Bounds on exceptional Dehn filling”, Geom. Topol. 4 (2000), 431–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Agol, I., “Volume change under drilling”, Geom. Topol. 6 (2002), 905–916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Agol, I., “Tameness of hyperbolic 3-manfolds”, preprint, 2004. Available at www.arXiv.org/ abs/math.GT/0405568.

Agol, I., “Criteria for virtual fibering”, J. Topol. 1 (2008), 269–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Agol, I., “The minimal volume orientable 2-cusped 3-manifolds”, Proc. A.M.S. 138(2010), 3723–3732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Agol, I., “Bounds on exceptional Dehn filling II”, Geom. Topol. 14 (2010), 1921–1940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Agol, I., “The Virtual Haken Conjecture, with an appendix by Agol, Groves, and Manning”, 2012, arXiv:1204.2810.

Agol, I. and Liu, Y., “Presentation length and Simon's conjecture”, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 25 (2012), 151–187,CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Agol, I., Storm, P. and Thurston, W. P., with an appendix by N., Dunfield, “Lower bounds on volumes of hyperbolic Haken 3-manifolds”, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 20 (2007), 1053–1077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ahlfors, L. V., “Finitely generated Kleinian groups”, Amer. J. Math. 86 (1964), 413–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ahlfors, L. V., Lectures on quasiconformal mappings, Van Nostrand Mathematical Studies 10, Van Nostrand, Toronto, 1966; Corrected 2nd edition with additional chapters by Earle and Kra, Shishikura, and Hubbard, A.M.S., 2006.Google Scholar

Ahlfors, L. V., Conformal invariants: topics in geometric function theory, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1973.Google Scholar

Ahlfors, L. V., Complex analysis, 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1978.Google Scholar

Ahlfors, L. V., Möbius transformations in several dimensions, Ordway Professorship Lectures in Mathematics, Univ. of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 1981.Google Scholar

Ahlfors, L. V. and Sario, L., Riemann surfaces, Princeton Mathematical Series 26, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Akiyoshi, H., Sakuma, M., Wada, M. and Yamashita, Y., “Ford domains of punctured torus groups and two-bridge knot groups”, in Knot Theory (Proceedings of the workshop held in Toronto dedicated to 70th birthday of Prof. K. Murasugi), 1999.

Akiyoshi, H., Sakuma, M., Wada, M. and Yamashita, Y., “Jørgensen's picture of punctured torus groups and its refinement”, pp. 247–273 in Kleinian groups and hyperbolic 3- manifolds (Warwick, 2001), edited by Y., Komori et al., London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser. 299, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2003.Google Scholar

Akiyoshi, H., Sakuma, M.,Wada, M. and Yamashita, Y., “Punctured torus groups and 2-bridge knot groups I”, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1909, Springer, Berlin, 2007.Google Scholar

Anderson, J. W., “Intersections of analytically and geometrically finite subgroups of Kleinian groups”, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 343:1 (1994), 87–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, J. W., “The limit set intersection theorem for finitely generated Kleinian groups,” Math. Res. Lett. 3:5 (1996), 675–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, J. W. and Canary, R. D., “Algebraic limits of Kleinian groups which rearrange the pages of a book”, Invent. Math. 126:2 (1996a), 205–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, J. W., Hyperbolic Geoometry, 2nd ed.Springer-Verlag London, Ltd., London, 2005.Google Scholar

Anderson, J. W., Talk at Iberoamerican Congress, CUNY, May, 2014.

Anderson, J. W., and Canary, R. D., “Cores of hyperbolic 3-manifolds and limits of Kleinian groups”, Amer. J. Math. 118:4 (1996b), 745–779.Google Scholar

Anderson, J. W., and Maskit, B., “On the local connectivity of limit set of Kleinian groups”, Complex Variables Theory Appl. 31 (1996), 177–183.Google Scholar

Anderson, J. W., Canary, R. D., Culler, M. and Shalen, P. B., “Free Kleinian groups and volumes of hyperbolic 3-manifolds”, J. Differential Geom. 43:4 (1996), 738–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, J. W., Canary, R. D. and McCullough, D., “The topology of deformation spaces of Kleinian groups”, Ann. of Math. (2) 152:3 (2000), 693–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Antonakoudis, S., “The bounded orbits conjecture for complex manifolds”, Harvard preprint.

Arnoux, P. and Yoccoz, J.-C., “Construction de diff'eomorphismes pseudo-Anosov”, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 292 (1981), 75–78.Google Scholar

Astala, K., “Area distortion of quasiconformal mappings”, Acta Math. 173 (1994), 37–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baba, S., “A Schottky decomposition theorem for complex projective structures”, Geometry and Topology 14 (2010), 117–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baba, S., “2p-Graftings and complex projective structures”, (Math GT) arXiv:1011.5051.

Ballmann, W., Gromov, M. and Schroeder, V., “Manifolds of nonpositive curvature”, Progress in Mathematics 61, Birkhäuser, Boston, 1985.Google Scholar

Basmajian, A., “Universal length bounds for non-simple closed geodesics on hyperbolic surfaces”, J. Topol. 6 (2013), 513–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bass, H. “Groups of integral representation type”, Pacific J. Math. 86:1 (1980), 15–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beardon, A. F.The geometry of discrete groups, Graduate Texts in Mathematics 91, Springer, New York, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beardon, A. F. and Jørgensen, T. “Fundamental domains for finitely generated Kleinian groups”, Math. Scand. 36 (1975), 21–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beardon, A. F. and Maskit, B. “Limit points of Kleinian groups and finite sided fundamental polyhedra”, Acta Math. 132 (1974), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beardon, A. F. and Pommerenke, C. “The Poincaré metric of plane domains”, J. London Math. Soc. (2) 18:3 (1978), 475–483.Google Scholar

Beardon, A. F. and Stephenson, K. “The uniformization theorem for circle packings”, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 39:4 (1990), 1383–1425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benedetti, R. and Petronio, C.Lectures on hyperbolic geometry, Universitext, Springer, Berlin, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bergeron, N., “La conjecture des sous-groups de surfaces”, Séminar Bourbaki no. 811 (2012), 1–28.

Bergeron, N. and Wise, D. T., “A boundary criterion for cubulation”, Amer. J. Math. 134 no. 3 (2012), 843–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bers, L., “Simultaneous uniformization”, Bulletin A.M.S. 66 (1960), 94–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bers, L., “On boundaries of Teichmüller spaces and on Kleinian groups, I”, Ann. of Math. (2) 91 (1970a), 570–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bers, L., “Spaces of Kleinian groups”, pp. 9–34 in Several Complex Variables (College Park, MD, 1970), vol. I, edited by J., Horváth, Lecture Notes in Math. 155, Springer, Berlin, 1970b.Google Scholar

Bers, L., “The action of the modular group on the complex boundary”, pp. 33–52 in Riemann Surfaces and Related Topics, Ann. Math. Stud 97, Princeton Univ. Press 1981.Google Scholar

Bers, L., “An inequality for Riemann surfaces”, pp. 87–93 in Differential geometry and complex analysis, Springer, Berlin, 1985.Google Scholar

Bers, L., “On iterates of hyperbolic transformations of Teichmüller space”, Amer. J. Math. 105 (1983), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bers, L., “An extremal problem for quasiconformal mappings and a theorem of Thurston”, Acta Math. 141 (1978), 73–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bers, L. and Greenberg, L., “Isomorphisms between Teichmüller spaces”, pp. 53–79 in Advances in the Theory of Riemann Surfaces (Stony Brook, NY, 1969), edited by L. V., Ahlfors et al., Ann. of Math. Studies 66, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, N.J., 1971.Google Scholar

Bessières, L., Besson, G., Boileau, M., Maillot, S. and Porti, J., Geometrization of 3- Manifolds, European Math. Soc., 2010.

Besson, G., Courtois, G. and Gallot, S., “Lemme de Schwarz réel et applications géométriques”, Acta Math. 183:2 (1999), 145–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bestvina, M., “Degenerations of the hyperbolic space”, Duke Math. J. 56:1 (1988), 143–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bestvina, M., “R trees in topology, geometry, and group theory”, arXiv/9712210 (2008).

Bestvina, M., “Geometric group theory and 3-manifolds hand in hand: the fulfillment of Thurston's vision”, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 51 (2014), 53–70.Google Scholar

Bestvina, M. and Feighn, M., “A hyperbolic Out(Fn)-complex”, Groups Geom. Dyn. 4 (2010), 31–58.Google Scholar

Biringer, I. and Souto, J., “Algebraic and geometric convergence of discrete representations into PSL2(C)”, Geom. & Top. 14 (2010), 2431–2477.Google Scholar

Biringer, I. and Souto, J., “A finiteness theorem for hyperbolic 3-manifolds”, J. Lon. Math. Soc. 84 (2011), 227–242.Google Scholar

Biringer, I. and Souto, J., “Rank of the fundamental group and topology of hyperbolic 3- manifolds”, 2006 Souto preprint, to appear.

Birman, J. S., “Mapping class groups of surfaces: a survey”, pp. 57–71 in Discontinuous groups and Riemann surfaces (College Park, MD, 1973), edited by L., Greenberg, Ann. of Math. Studies 79, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 1974.Google Scholar

Birman, J. S. and Series, C., “Geodesics with bounded intersection number on surfaces are sparsely distributed”, Topology 24:2 (1985), 217–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bishop, C. J. and Jones, P.W., “Hausdorff dimension and Kleinian groups”, Acta Math. 179:1 (1997), 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bleiler, S. A. and Hodgson, C. D., “Spherical space forms and Dehn filling”, Topology 35:3 (1996), 809–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bobenko, A. I. and Springborn, B. A., “Variational principles for circle patterns and Koebe's theorem”, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 356:2 (2004), 659–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boileau, M. and Porti, J., Geometrization of 3-orbifolds of cyclic type, Astérisque 272, 2001.

Boileau, M., Maillot, S. and Porti, J., Three-dimensional orbifolds and their geometric structures, Panoramas et Synthèses 15, Société Mathématique de France, Paris, 2003.Google Scholar

Boileau, M., Leeb, B. and Porti, J., “Geometrization of 3-dimensional orbifolds”, Ann. of Math. (2) 162:1 (2005), 195–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonahon, F., “Bouts des variétés hyperboliques de dimension 3”, Ann. of Math. (2) 124:1 (1986), 71–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonahon, F., “The geometry of Teichmüller space via geodesic currents”, Invent. Math. 92:1 (1988), 139–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonahon, F., “Shearing hyperbolic surfaces, bending pleated surfaces and Thurston's symplectic form”, Ann. Fac. Sci. Toulouse Math. (6) 5:2 (1996), 233–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonahon, F., “Geodesic laminations on surfaces”, pp. 1–37 in Laminations and foliations in dynamics, geometry and topology (Stony Brook, NY, 1998), edited by M., Lyubich et al., Contemp. Math. 269, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2001.Google Scholar

Bonahon, F., “Geometric structures on 3-manifolds”, pp. 93–164 in Handbook of geometric topology, edited by R. J., Daverman and R. B., Sher, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 2002.Google Scholar

Bonahon, F., Low-Dimensional Geometry, A.M.S. Providence, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonahon, F. and Otal, J.-P., “Laminations mesurées de plissage des variétés hyperboliques de dimension 3”, Ann. Math. 160 (2004), 1013–1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonk, M., “Singular surfaces and meromorphic functions”, Notices Amer. Math. Soc. 49:6 (2002), 647–657.Google Scholar

Bowditch, B. H. and Mess, G., “A 4-dimensional Kleinian group”, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 344 (1994), 391–405.Google Scholar

Bowditch, B. H., “A proof of McShane's identity via Markoff triples”, Bull. London Math. Soc. 28:1 (1996), 73–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowditch, B. H., “Markoff triples and quasi-Fuchsian groups”, Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 77:3 (1998), 697–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowditch, B. H., “A course on geometric group theory”, MSJ Memoirs 16 Mathematical Society of Japan, Tokyo, 2006.Google Scholar

Bowditch, B. H., “Notes on tameness”, Enseign Math. 56 (2010), 229-285.

Bowditch, B. H., “An upper bound for injectivity radii in convex cores”, Groups, Geometry, and Dynamics, 7, European Math. Soc, (2013), 109–126.Google Scholar

Bowditch, B. H., “The ending lamination theorem”, Warwick preprint, preliminary draft (2011).

Bowditch, B. H. and Epstein, D. B. A., “Natural triangulations associated to a surface”, Topology, 27(1988), 91–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowers, P. L. and Stephenson, K., “The set of circle packing points in the Teichmüller space of a surface of finite conformal type is dense”, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 111:3 (1992), 487–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowers, P. and Stephenson, K., “ A branched Andreev-Thurston theom for circle packings of the sphere”, Proc. London Math. Soc. 73 (1996), 185–215.Google Scholar

Bowers, P. L. and Stephenson, K., Uniformizing dessins and Bely?i maps via circle packing, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 805, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, 2004.Google Scholar

Brendle, T. E. and Farb, B., “Every mapping class group is generated by 6 involutions”, J. Algebra 278:1 (2004), 187–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bridgeman, M., “Average bending of convex pleated planes in hyperbolic three-space”, Invent. Math. 132:2 (1998), 381–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bridgeman, M., “Bounds on the average bending of the convex hull boundary of a Kleinian group”, Michigan Math. J. 51:2 (2003), 363–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bridgeman, M. and Canary, R., “The Thurston metric on hyperbolic domains and boundaries of convex hulls”, Geometric and Functional Analysis 20 (2010), 1317–1353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bridgeman, M. and Kahn, J., “Hyperbolic volume of n-manifolds with geodesic boundary and orthospectra”, Geometric and Functional Analysis, 20 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bridson, M. R., and Haefliger, A., Metric spaces of non-positive curvature, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brock, J. F., “Continuity of Thurston's length function”, Geom. Funct. Anal. 10:4 (2000), 741–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brock, J. F., “Boundaries of Teichmüller spaces and end-invariants for hyperbolic 3- manifolds”, Duke Math. J. 106:3 (2001a), 527–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brock, J. F., “Iteration of mapping classes and limits of hyperbolic 3-manifolds”, Invent. Math. 143:3 (2001b), 523–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brock, J. F., “The Weil-Petersson metric and volumes of 3-dimensional hyperbolic convex cores”, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 16 (2003), 495–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brock, J. F. and Bromberg, K. W., “Cone-manifolds and the density conjecture”, pp. 75–93 in Kleinian groups and hyperbolic 3-manifolds, London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser. 299, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2003.Google Scholar

Brock, J. F. and Bromberg, K. W., “On the density of geometrically finite Kleinian groups”, Acta Math. 192:1 (2004), 33–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brock, J. F. and Dumas, D., “Thurston's Jewel: A convex hull image”, Online resource Available at http://dumas.io/jewel/.

Brock, J. F. and Dunfield, N., “Injectivity radii of hyperbolic integer homology 3-spheres”, Available at www.arXiv.org/math.GT/1304.0391.

Brock, J. F., and Farb, B., “Curvature and rank of Teichmüller space”, Amer. J. Math. 128 (2006), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brock, J. F. and Margalit, D., “Weil-Petersson isometries via the pants complex”, Proc. A.M.S. 135 (2007), 795–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brock, J. and Souto, J., “Algebraic limits of geometrically finite manifolds are tame”, Geom. Funct. Anal. bf 16 (2006), 1–39.Google Scholar

Brock, J., Bromberg, K., Evans, R. and Souto, J., “Tameness on the boundary and Ahlfors’ measure conjecture”, Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. no. 98 (2003), 145–166.Google Scholar

Brock, J., Canary, R. D. and Minsky, Y., “Classification of Kleinian surface groups, II: The ending lamination conjecture”, Ann. of Math. 176 (2012), 1–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brock, J., Canary, R. D., Bromberg, K. and Minsky, Y., ‘Local topology in deformation spaces of hyperbolic 3-manifolds”, Geom. & Topology 15 (2011),1169–1224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bromberg, K., “Hyperbolic Dehn surgery on geometrically infinite 3-manifolds”, preprint, 2000. Available at www.arXiv.org/math.GT/0009150.

Bromberg, K., “Hyperbolic cone-manifolds, short geodesics, and Schwarzian derivatives”, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 17:4 (2004), 783–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bromberg, K., “Projective structures with degenerate holonomy and the Bers density conjecture”, Ann. of Math. 166 (2007), 77–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bromberg, K., “The space of Kleinian punctured torus groups is not locally connected”, Duke Math. J., 156 (2011), 349–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bromberg, K. and Holt, J., “Self-bumping of deformation spaces of hyperbolic 3-manifolds”, J. Differential Geom. 57:1 (2001), 47–65.Google Scholar

Bromberg, K. and Souto, J., “The density conjecture, a prehistoric approach”, in preparaton.

Brooks, R., “On the deformation theory of classical Schottky groups”, Duke Math. J. 52:4 (1985), 1009–1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brooks, R., “Circle packings and co-compact extensions of Kleinian groups”, Invent. Math. 86:3 (1986), 461–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brooks, R., “Twist surfaces”, pp. 85–103 in Random walks and discrete potential theory (Cortona, 1997), edited by M., Picardello and W., Woess, Symposia Mathematica 39, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1999.Google Scholar

Brooks, R. and Matelski, J. P., “The dynamics of 2-generator subgroups of PSL(2, C)”, pp. 65–71 in Riemann surfaces and related topics (Stony Brook, NY, 1978), edited by I., Kra and B., Maskit, Ann. of Math. Stud. 97, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 1981.Google Scholar

Brunner, A. M., Frame, M. L., Lee, Y. W. and Wielenberg, N. J., “Classifying torsion-free subgroups of the Picard group”, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 282:1 (1984), 205–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burger, M. and Canary, R. D., “A lower bound on 0 for geometrically finite hyperbolic nmanifolds”, J. Reine Angew. Math. 454 (1994), 37–57.Google Scholar

Burger, M., Gelander, T., Lubotzky, A. and Mozes, S., “Counting hyperbolic manifolds”, Geom. Funct. Anal. 12:6 (2002), 1161–1173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buser, P., “Geometry and spectra of compact Riemann surfaces”, Progress in Mathematics 106, Birkhäuser, Boston, 1992.Google Scholar

Button, J. O., “Fibred and virtually fibred hyperbolic 3-manifolds in the censuses”, Experiment. Math. 14:2 (2005), 231–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calegari, D. and Gabai, D., “Shrinkwrapping and the taming of hyperbolic 3-manifolds”, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 19 (2006), 385–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Callahan, P. J., Dean, J. C. and Weeks, J. R., “The simplest hyperbolic knots”, J. Knot Theory Ramifications 8:3 (1999), 279–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Canary, R. D., “The Poincaré metric and a conformal version of a theorem of Thurston”, Duke Math. J. 64:2 (1991), 349–359.Google Scholar

Canary, R. D., “On the Laplacian and the geometry of hyperbolic 3-manifolds”, J. Differential Geom. 36:2 (1992), 349–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Canary, R. D., “Ends of hyperbolic 3-manifolds”, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 6:1 (1993), 1–35.Google Scholar

Canary, R. D., “A covering theorem for hyperbolic 3-manifolds and its applications”, Topology 35:3 (1996), 751–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Canary, R. D. and Hersonsky, S., “Ubiquity of geometric finiteness in boundaries of deformation spaces of hyperbolic 3-manifolds”, Amer. J. Math. 126:6 (2004), 1193–1220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Canary, R. D. and McCullough, D., Homotopy equivalences of 3-manifolds and deformation theory of Kleinian groups, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 812, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, 2004.Google Scholar

Canary, R. D. and Minsky, Y. N., “On limits of tame hyperbolic 3-manifolds”, J. Differential Geom. 43:1 (1996), 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Canary, R. D. and Storm, P., “Moduli spaces of hyperbolic 3-manifolds and dynamics of character varieties”, Comm. Math. Helv, 88 (2013), 221–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Canary, R. D. and Storm, P., “The curious moduli space of unmarked Kleinian surface groups”, Amer. Jour. Math. 134 (2012), 71–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Canary, R. D. and Taylor, E., “Kleinian groups with small limit sets”, Duke Math. J. 73:2 (1994), 371–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Canary, R. D., Epstein, D. B. A. and Green, P., “Notes on notes of Thurston”, pp. 3–92 in Analytical and geometric aspects of hyperbolic space (Warwick and Durham, 1984), edited by D. B. A., Epstein, London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser. 111, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1987. Reprinted in Canary et al. [2006].Google Scholar

Canary, R. D., Minsky, Y. N. and Taylor, E. C., “Spectral theory, Hausdorff dimension and the topology of hyperbolic 3-manifolds”, J. Geom. Anal. 9:1 (1999), 17–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Canary, R. D., Culler, M., Hersonsky, S. and Shalen, P. B., “Approximation by maximal cusps in boundaries of deformation spaces of Kleinian groups”, J. Differential Geom. 64:1 (2003), 57–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Canary, R. D., Marden, A. and Epstein, D. B. A., (editors), Fundamentals of hyperbolic geometry: selected expositions, edited by R. D., Canary et al., London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser. 328, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cannon, J. W., “The theory of negatively curved spaces and groups”, pp. 315–369 in Ergodic theory, symbolic dynamics, and hyperbolic spaces (Trieste, 1989), Oxford Sci. Publ., Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1991.Google Scholar

Cannon, J. W., “Geometric group theory”, pp. 261–305 in Handbook of geometric topology, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 2002.Google Scholar

Cannon, J. W., “Cannon's conjecture”, in McGraw-Hill 2011 yearbook of science and technology, McGraw-Hill, New York (2011).Google Scholar

Cannon, J.W. and Cooper, D., “A characterization of cocompact hyperbolic and finite-volume hyperbolic groups in dimension three”, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 330:1 (1992), 419–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cannon, J. W. and Thurston, W. P., “Group invariant Peano curves”, Geom. Topol. 11 (2007), 1315–1355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cannon, J. W., Floyd, W. J., Kenyon, R. and Parry, W. R., “Hyperbolic geometry”, pp. 59– 115 in Flavors of geometry, Math. Sci. Res. Inst. Publ. 31, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1997.Google Scholar

Cannon, J. W., Floyd, W. J. and Parry, W. R., “Twisted face pairing 3-manifolds”, Trans. A.M.S. 354, (2002), 2369–2397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cao, J. G., “The Bers-Nielsen kernels and souls of open surfaces with negative curvature”, Michigan Math. J. 41:1 (1994), 13–30.Google Scholar

Cao, C. and Meyerhoff, G. R., “The orientable cusped hyperbolic 3-manifolds of minimum volume”, Invent. Math. 146:3 (2001), 451–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Casson, A. J. and Bleiler, S. A., Automorphisms of surfaces after Nielsen and Thurston, London Mathematical Society Student Texts 9, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Casson, A. and Jungreis, D., “Convergence groups and Seifert fibered 3-manifolds”, Invent. Math. 118:3 (1994), 441–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Charney, R., “An introduction to right-angled Artin groups”, Geom. Dedicata 125 (2007), 141–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chavel, I., Riemannian geometry—a modern introduction, Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics 108, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1993.Google Scholar

Choi, Y.-E. and Series, C., “Lengths are coordinates for convex structures”, J. Differential Geom. 73:1 (2006), 75–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chow, B. and Knopf, D., “The Ricci flow: an introduction”, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs 110, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2004.Google Scholar

Conder, M., Martin, G. and Torstensson, A., “Maximal symmetry groups of hyperbolic 3- manifolds”, New Zealand J. Math. 35 (2006), 37–62.Google Scholar

Cooper, D., “The volume of a closed hyperbolic 3-manifold is bounded by p times the length of any presentation of its fundamental group”, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 127:3 (1999), 941–942.Google Scholar

Cooper, D. and Long, D. D. and Reid, A. W., “Essential closed surfaces in bounded 3-manifolds”, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 10 (1997), no. 3, 553–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cooper, D. and Lackenby, M., “Dehn surgery and negatively curved 3-manifolds”, J. Differential Geom. 50:3 (1998), 591–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cooper, D., Hodgson, C. D. and Kerckhoff, S. P., Three-dimensional orbifolds and conemanifolds, MSJ Memoirs 5, Mathematical Society of Japan, Tokyo, 2000.Google Scholar

Coulson, D., Goodman, O. A., Hodgson, C. D. and Neumann, W. D., “Computing arithmetic invariants of 3-manifolds”, Experiment. Math. 9:1 (2000), 127–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coxeter, H. S. M., Introduction to geometry, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1961.Google Scholar

Culler, M., “Lifting representations to covering groups”, Adv. in Math. 59:1 (1986), 64–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Culler, M. and Dunfield, N., “Snappy”, Available at http://www.uic.edu/t3m/SnapPy/doc/ (2012). Software to compute hyperbolic manifolds.

Culler, M. and Shalen, P. B., “Varieties of group representations and splittings of 3- manifolds”, Ann. of Math. (2) 117:1 (1983), 109–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Culler, M. and Shalen, P. B., “Margulis numbers for Haken manifolds”, math.GT/arXiv:1006. 3467 (2010).

Culler, M. and Vogtmann, K., “Moduli of graphs and automorphisms of free groups”, Invent. Math. 84 (1986), 91–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dahmani, F.Guirardel, V.Osin, D., “Hyperbolically embedded subgroups and rotating families in groups acting on hyperbolic spaces”, arXiv:1111.7048v3.

De-Spiller, D. A., “Equimorphisms, and quasiconformal mappings of the absolute”, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 194 (1970), 1006–1009.Google Scholar

Donaldson, S., Riemann surfaces, Oxford U. Press, New York, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Douady, A. and Earle, C. J., “Conformally natural extension of homeomorphisms of the circle”, Acta Math. 157:1-2 (1986), 23–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doyle, P., “On the bass note of a Schottky group”, Acta Math 160 (1988), 249–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dumas, D., “The Schwarzian derivative and measured laminations on Riemann surfaces”, Duke Math. J. 140 (2007), 203–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dumas, D., “Complex projective structures”, in Handbook of Teichmüller space, A. Papadoupoulos, ed., Eur. Math. Soc. 2009.Google Scholar

Dumas, D., “Skinning maps are finite-to-one”, Math GT, arXiv:1203:0273.

Dumas, D. and Kent IV, R. P., “Slicing, skinning, and grafting”, Amer. J. Math. 131 (2009), 1419–1429.Google Scholar

Dumas, D. and Wolf, M., “Projective structures, grafting and measured laminations”, Geometry and Topology 12 (2008), 351–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunbar, W. D. and Meyerhoff, G. R., “Volumes of hyperbolic 3-orbifolds”, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 43:2 (1994), 611–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunfield, N. M., “Surfaces in finite covers of 3-manifolds: the Virtual Haken Conjecture”, Video of lecture at GEAR retreat, Urbana, August 2012, www.math.uiuc.edu/~nmd.

Dunfield, N. M. and Thurston, W. P., “The virtual Haken conjecture: experiments and examples”, Geom. Topol. 7 (2003), 399–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunfield, N. M. and Thurston, W. P., “Finite covers of random 3-manifolds”, Invent. Math. 166 (2006), 457–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duren, P. L., Univalent functions, Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften 259, Springer, New York, 1983.Google Scholar

Earle, C. J., “The infinite Nielsen kernels of some bordered Riemann surfaces”, Michigan Math. J. 40:3 (1993), 445–458.Google Scholar

Earle, C. J. and Kra, I., “On holomorphic mappings between Teichmüller spaces”, pp. 107– 124 in Contributions to analysis (a collection of papers dedicated to Lipman Bers), Academic Press, New York, 1974.Google Scholar

Earle, C. J. and Marden, A., “Holomorphic plumbing coordinates”, in Quasiconformal mappings, Riemann surfaces, and Teichmueller spaces, Y., Jiang, S., Mitra, eds., Contemporary Math. Series AMS, 573 (2012), 67–97.Google Scholar

Earle, C. J. and Marden, A., “Holomorphic plumbing coordinates on Teichmueller and compactified moduli space”, to appear.

Earle, C. J. and Marden, A., “Disjointness of parabolic canonical regions”, to appear.

Earle, C. J., Kra, I. and Krushkal, S. L., “Holomorphic motions and Teichmüller spaces”, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 343:2 (1994), 927–948.Google Scholar

Edmonds, A. L., “Deformation of maps to branched coverings in dimension two”, Annals of Math. 110 (1979a), 113–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edmonds, A. L., “Deformation of maps to branched coverings in dimension three”, Math. Ann. 245 (1979b), 273–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edmonds, A. L., Kulkarni, R. S., Stong, R. E., “Realizability of branched coverings of surfaces,” Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 282 (1984), 773–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Efremovic, V. A. and Tihomirova, E. S., “Equimorphisms of hyperbolic spaces”, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat. 28 (1964), 1139–1144. In Russian.Google Scholar

Epstein, C. L., “The hyperbolic Gauss map and quasiconformal reflections”, J. Reine Angew. Math. 372 (1986), 96–135.Google Scholar

Epstein, D. B. A., “Curves on 2-manifolds and isotopies”, Acta Math., 115 (1966). 83–107.Google Scholar

Epstein, D. and Gunn, C., Supplement to Not knot, A K Peters, 1991.Google Scholar

Epstein, D. B. A. and Marden, A., “Convex hulls in hyperbolic space, a theorem of Sullivan, and measured pleated surfaces”, pp. 113–253 in Analytical and geometric aspects of hyperbolic space (Warwick and Durham, 1984), edited by D. B. A., Epstein, London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser. 111, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1987. Reprinted in Canary et al. [2006].Google Scholar

Epstein, D. B. A. and Markovic, V., “Extending homeomorphisms of the circle to quasiconformal homeomorphims of the disc”, Geom. Top. 10 (2007), 517–595.Google Scholar

Epstein, D. B. A. and Penner, R. C., “Euclidean decompositions of noncompact hyperbolic manifolds”, J. Differential Geom. 27 (1988), 67–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Epstein, D. B. A. and Petronio, C., “An exposition of Poincaré's polyhedron theorem”, Enseign. Math. (2) 40:1-2 (1994), 113–170.Google Scholar

Epstein, D. B. A., Cannon, J. W., Holt, D. F., Levy, S. V. F., Paterson, M. S. and Thurston, W. P., Word processing in groups, Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Boston, 1992.Google Scholar

Epstein, D. B. A., Marden, A. and Markovic, V., “Quasiconformal homeomorphisms and the convex hull boundary”, Ann. of Math. (2) 159:1 (2004), 305–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Epstein, D. B. A., Marden, A. and Markovic, V., “Complex earthquakes and deformations of the unit disk”, J. Differential Geom 73 (2006), 119–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eskin, A., Masur, H. and Rafi, K., “Rigidity of Teichmueller space”, arXiv:1506.04774.

Evans, R., “Weakly type-preserving sequences and strong convergence”, Geom. Dedicata 108 (2004a), 71–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evans, R. A., “Tameness persists in weakly type-preserving strong limits”, Amer. J. Math. 126:4 (2004b), 713–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evans, R. A., “Uniformly bounded radii of balls in convex cores of hyperbolic 3-manifolds”, Auckland preprint (2005).

Evans, R. A., “McMullen's conjecture for convex cores of hyperbolic 3-manifolds”, Auckland preprint (2006).

Farb, B., “Relatively hyperbolic groups”, Geom. Funct. Anal. 8:5 (1998), 810–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Farb, B., “Some problems on mapping class groups and moduli space”, Problems on mapping class groups and related topics, 11–55, in Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., A.M.S. 74, 2006.Google Scholar

Farb, B. and Margalit, D., A Primer on Mapping Class Groups, Princeton University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Farkas, H. M. and Kra, I., Riemann surfaces, 2nd ed. Graduate Texts in Mathematics 71, Springer, New York, 1991.Google Scholar

Fathi, A., Laudenbach, F. and Poénaru, V., Travaux de Thurston sur les surfaces, Astérisque 66, Société Mathématique de France, Paris, 1979. English translation, Princeton Univ. Press, 2012. Book review by D. Margalit, Bull. A.M.S. 51 (2013).Google Scholar

Fatou, P., “Fonctions automorphes”, in Théorie des fonctions algébriques et de leurs intégrales, 2nd ed., vol. 2, Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1930.Google Scholar

Feighn, P. and McCullough, D., “Finiteness conditions for 3-manifolds with boundary”, Amer. J. Math. 109:6 (1987), 1155–1169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feighn, M. and Mess, G., “Conjugacy classes of finite subgroups of Kleinian groups”, Amer. J. Math. 113:1 (1991), 179–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fenchel, W., Elementary geometry in hyperbolic space, Studies in Mathematics 11, de Gruyter, Berlin, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fletcher, A. and Markovic, V., Quasiconformal maps and Teichmüller theory, Oxford U. Press, New York, 2007.Google Scholar

Floyd, W.,Weber, B. and Weeks, J., “The Achilles’ heel of O(3, 1)?”, Experiment. Math. 11:1 (2002), 91–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ford, L. R., Automorphic Functions, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1929. Reprinted by Chelsea, New York, 1951.Google Scholar

Fox, R. H. and Artin, E., “Some wild cells and spheres in three-dimensional space”, Ann. of Math. (2) 49 (1948), 979–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freedman, M. H. and Gabai, D., “Covering a nontaming knot by the unlink”, Algebraic and Geometric Topology 7 (2007), 1561–1578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frigerio, R., Martelli, B. and Petronio, C., “Small hyperbolic 3-manifolds with geodesic boundary”, Experiment. Math. 13:2 (2004), 171–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fujii, M., “Hyperbolic 3-manifolds with totally geodesic boundary which are decomposed into hyperbolic truncated tetrahedra”, Tokyo J. Math. 13:2 (1990), 353–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gabai, D., “On 3-Minifolds Finitely Covered by Surface Bundles”, pp. 145–155 in Low dimensional topology and Kleinian groups (Warwick and Durham, 1984), edited by D. B. a., Epstein, London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser. 112, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1986.Google Scholar

Gabai, D., “Convergence groups are Fuchsian groups”, Ann. of Math. (2) 136:3 (1992), 447–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gabai, D., “On the geometric and topological rigidity of hyperbolic 3-manifolds”, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 10 (1997), 37–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gabai, D., “The Smale conjecture for hyperbolic 3-manifolds: Isom(M3)(Diff(M3)”, J. Differential Geom. 58 (2001a), 113–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gabai, D., “Almost filling laminations and the connectivity of ending lamination space”, Geometry & Topology 13 (2009), 1017–1041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gabai, D., “On the topology of ending lamination space”, Geom. Topol. 18 (2014), 2683– 2745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gabai, D., Meyerhoff, G. R. and Milley, P., “Volumes of tubes in hyperbolic 3-manifolds”, J. Differential Geom. 57:1 (2001b), 23–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gabai, D., Meyerhoff, G. R. and Thurston, N., “Homotopy hyperbolic 3-manifolds are hyperbolic”, Ann. of Math. (2) 157:2 (2003), 335–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gabai, D., Meyerhoff, G. R. and Milley, P., “Minimum volume cusped hyperbolic threemanifolds”, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 22 (2009), 1157–1215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gabai, D., Meyerhoff, G. R. and Milley, P., “Mom technology and hyperbolic 3-manifold”, pp. 84–107 in In the tradition of Ahlfors-Bers, Contemp. Math. 510, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2010.Google Scholar

Gabai, D., Meyerhoff, G. R. and Milley, P., “Mom technology and volumes of hyperbolic 3-manifolds”, Comment. Math. Helv. 86 (2011), 145–188.Google Scholar

Gallo, D., Kapovich, M. and Marden, A., “The monodromy groups of Schwarzian equations on closed Riemann surfaces”, Ann. of Math. (2) 151:2 (2000), 625–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gardiner, F. R. and Lakic, N., “Comparing Poincaré densities”, Ann. of Math. 154 (2001), 245–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gaster, J., “A family of non-injective skinning maps with critical points”, (2012) Available at www.arXiv.org/math.GT/1212.6210.

Gehring, F. W., “Rings and quasiconformal mappings in space”, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 103 (1962), 353–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gehring, F.W. and Martin, G. J., “Commutators, collars and the geometry of Möbius groups”, J. Anal. Math. 63 (1994), 175–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilman, J., Two-generator discrete subgroups of PSL(2,R), Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 561, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, 1995.Google Scholar

Gilman, J., “Algorithms, complexity and discreteness criteria in PSL(2,C)”, J. Anal. Math. 73 (1997), 91–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilman, J. and Waterman, P., “Classical two-parabolic T-Schottky groups”, J. Anal. Math. 98 (2006), 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldman, W. M., “Projective structures with Fuchsian holonomy”, J. Differential Geom. 25:3 (1987), 297–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldman, W. M., “Topological components of spaces of representations”, Invent. Math. 93 (1988), 557–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldman, W. M., “The modular group action on real SL(2)-characters of a one-holed torus”, Geom. Topol. 7 (2003), 443–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodman, O., “Snap”, 2006 Available at http://sourceforge.net/projects/snap-pari. Software to computing arithmetic invariants of hyperbolic 3-manifolds.

Goodman, O., Heard, D. and Hodgson, C., “Commensurators of cusped hyperbolic manifolds”, Experiment Math. 17 (2008), 283–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gordon, C. M. and Luecke, J., “Knots are determined by their complements”, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 2:2 (1989), 371–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gray, J., Linear differential equations and group theory from Riemann to Poincaré, Birkhäuser, Boston, 1986. 2nd edition, 2000. Gray, J., 2002. Unpublished manuscript.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gray, J., Henri Poincaré: A Scientific Biography, Princeton U. Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Greenberg, L., “Discrete groups of motions”, Canad. J. Math. 12 (1960), 415–426.

Greenberg, L., “Discrete subgroups of the Lorentz group”, Math. Scand. 10 (1962), 85–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenberg, L., “Fundamental polyhedra for kleinian groups”, Ann. of Math. (2) 84 (1966), 433–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenberg, L., “Commensurable groups of Moebius transformations”, pp. 227–237 in Discontinuous groups and Riemann surfaces (College Park, MD, 1973), edited by L., Greenberg, Ann. of Math. Studies 79, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 1974.Google Scholar

Greenberg, L., “Maximal groups and signatures”, pp. 207–226 in Discontinuous groups and Riemann surfaces (College Park, MD, 1973), edited by L., Greenberg, Ann. of Math. Studies 79, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 1974.Google Scholar

Greenberg, L., “Finiteness theorems for Fuchsian and Kleinian groups”, pp. 199–257 in Discrete groups and automorphic functions (Cambridge, 1975), edited by W., Harvey, Academic Press, London, 1977.Google Scholar

Greenberg, L., “Homomorphisms of triangle groups into PSL(2, C)”, pp. 167–181 in Riemann surfaces and related topics (Stony Brook, NY, 1978), edited by I., Kra and B., Maskit, Ann. of Math. Stud. 97, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 1981.Google Scholar

Gromov, M., “Groups of polynomial growth and expanding maps”, Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ. Math. no. 53 (1981a), 53–73.Google Scholar

Gromov, M., “Hyperbolic manifolds (according to Thurston and Jørgensen)”, pp. 40–53 in Bourbaki Seminar, 1979/80, Lecture Notes in Math. 842, Springer, Berlin, 1981b.Google Scholar

Gromov, M., “Hyperbolic groups”, pp. 75–263 in Essays in group theory, Math. Sci. Res. Inst. Publ. 8, Springer, New York, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gromov, M. and Thurston, W., “Pinching constants for hyperbolic manifolds”, Invent. Math. 89:1 (1987), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gunn, C. and Maxwell, D., Not Knot Video, The Geometry Center, UMN; DVD distributed by A.K. Peters/Taylor and Francis, 1991.

Guo, R., “Characterizations of hyperbolic geometry among Hilbert geometries: A survey”, in Handbook of Hilbert Geometry, A. Papadopoulos, ed., to appear.

Halpern, N., “A proof of the collar lemma”, Bull. London Math. Soc. 13 (1981), 141–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hamenstädt, U., “Length functions and parameterizations of Teichmüller space for surfaces with cusps”, Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. 28 (2003), 75–88.Google Scholar

Hamenstädt, U., “Train tracks and the Gromov boundary of the complex of curves” pp. 187– 207 in Spaces of Kleinian groups, London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser. 329, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2006.Google Scholar

Hamenstädt, U., “Geometry of the mapping class group III: Quasiisometric rigidity”, arXiv: mathGT/0512429 (2007).

Hartshorn, K., “Heegaard splittings of Haken manifolds”, Pacific J. Math. 204 (2002), 61–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harvey, W. J., “Spaces of discrete groups”, pp. 295–348 in Discrete groups and Automorphic Functions (Cambridge, 1975), edited by W., Harvey, Academic Press, London, 1977.Google Scholar

Harvey, W. J., “Boundary structure of the modular group”, pp. 245–251 in Riemann surfaces and related topics (Stony Brook, NY, 1978), edited by I., Kra and B., Maskit, Ann. of Math. Stud. 97, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 1981.Google Scholar

Heard, D., “Orb,” Available at http://www.ms.unimelb.edu.au/~snap/orb.html. software to compute hyperbolic structures on graph complements and orbifolds.

Hejhal, D. A., “Monodromy groups and linearly polymorphic functions”, Acta Math. 135:1 (1975), 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hempel, J., 3-Manifolds, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 1976.Google Scholar

Hempel, J., “Residual finiteness for 3-manifolds”, pp. 379–396 in Combinatorial group theory and topology (Alta, Utah, 1984), Ann. of Math. Stud. 111, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 1987.Google Scholar

Hempel, J., “3-manifolds from the curve complex”, Topology 40 (2001), 630–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hidalgo, R. and Maskit, B., “On neoclassical Schottky groups”, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 358 (2006), 4765–4792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hildebrand, M. and Weeks, J., “A computer generated census of cusped hyperbolic 3- manifolds”, pp. 53–59 in Computers and mathematics (Cambridge, MA, 1989), Springer, New York, 1989.Google Scholar

Hilden, H. M., Lozano, M. T. and Montesinos, J. M. “On knots that are universal”, Topology 24:4 (1985), 499–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hilden, H. M., Lozano, M. T., Montesinos, J. M. and Whitten, W., “On universal groups and three-manifolds”, Invent. Math 87 (1987), 441–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hocking, J. G. and Young, G. S., Topology, Addison-Wesley, Reading (MA), 1961.Google Scholar

Hodgson, C. D. and Kerckhoff, S. P., “Rigidity of hyperbolic cone-manifolds and hyperbolic Dehn surgery”, J. Differential Geom. 48:1 (1998), 1–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hodgson, C. D. and Weeks, J. R., “Symmetries, isometries and length spectra of closed hyperbolic three-manifolds”, Experiment. Math. 3:4 (1994), 261–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoffman, N., Ichihara, K., Kashiwagi, M., Masai, H., Oishi, S. and Takayasu, A., “Verified computations for hyperbolic 3-manifolds”, arXiv 1310.3410 (2013).

Holt, J., “Multiple bumping of components of deformation spaces of hyperbolic 3-manifolds”, Amer. J. Math. 125:4 (2003), 691–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hou, Y., “Kleinian groups of small Hausdorff dimension are classical Schottky groups”, Geom. Topol. 14 (2010), 473–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hubbard, J. H., Teichmüller Theory, Matrix Editions, Ithaca, N.Y., 2006.Google Scholar

Imayoshi, Y. and Taniguchi, M., An introduction to Teichmüller spaces, Springer, Tokyo, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ito, K., “Exotic projective structures and quasi-Fuchsian space”, Duke Math. J. 105:2 (2000), 185–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ivanov, N. V., Subgroups of Teichmüller modular groups, Translations of Mathematical Monographs 115, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ivanov, N. V., “Automorphisms of complexes of curves and of Teichmüller spaces”, in Progress in Knot Theory and Related Topics, Travaux en Cours 56, Herman, Paris, 1997, also Internat. Math. Res. Notices 1997, no. 14, 651–666.Google Scholar

Ivanov, N. V., “Mapping class groups”, in Handbook of geometric topology, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 2002.Google Scholar

Ivanov, N. V., “Arnol'd, the Jacobi identity, and orthocenters”, Amer. Math. Monthly 118 (2011), 41–65.Google Scholar

Jaco, W., Lectures on three-manifold topology, CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics 43, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, 1980.

Jaco, W. H. and Shalen, P. B., Seifert fibered spaces in 3-manifolds, Mem. A.M.S. 21 no. 220, Providence (1979).Google Scholar

Johannson, K., Homotopy equivalences of 3-manifolds with boundaries, Lecture Notes in Math. 761, Springer, Berlin, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, G. A., “Counting subgroups of non-Euclidean crystallographic groups”, Math. Scand. 84 (1) (1999), 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, G. A. and Singerman, D., “Theory of maps on orientable surfaces”, Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 37:2 (1978), 273–307.Google Scholar

Jones, G. and Singerman, D., “Bely?i functions, hypermaps and Galois groups”, Bull. London Math. Soc. 28:6 (1996), 561–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jørgensen, T., “On cyclic groups of Möbius transformations”, Math. Scand. 33 (1973), 250–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jørgensen, T., “On reopening of cusps”, 1974a.

Jørgensen, T., “Some remarks on Kleinian groups”, Math. Scand. 34 (1974b), 101–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jørgensen, T., “On discrete groups of Möbius transformations”, Amer. J. Math. 98:3 (1976), 739–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jørgensen, T., “Compact 3-manifolds of constant negative curvature fibering over the circle”, Ann. Math. (2) 106:1 (1977a), 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jørgensen, T., “A note on subgroups of SL(2,C)”, Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser. (2) 28:110 (1977b), 209–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jørgensen, T., “Closed geodesics on Riemann surfaces”, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 72:1 (1978), 140–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jørgensen, T., “Commutators in SL(2, C)”, pp. 301–303 in Riemann surfaces and related topics (Stony Brook, NY, 1978), edited by I., Kra and B., Maskit, Ann. of Math. Stud. 97, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 1981.Google Scholar

Jørgensen, T., “Composition and length of hyperbolic motions”, pp. 211–220 in In the tradition of Ahlfors and Bers (Stony Brook, NY, 1998), Contemp. Math. 256, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jørgensen, T., “On pairs of once-punctured tori”, pp. 183–207 in Kleinian groups and hyperbolic 3-manifolds (Warwick, 2001), London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser. 299, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2003.Google Scholar

Jørgensen, T. and Kiikka, M., “Some extreme discrete groups”, Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Ser. A I Math. 1:2 (1975), 245–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jørgensen, T. and Klein, P., “Algebraic convergence of finitely generated Kleinian groups”, Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser. (2) 33:131 (1982), 325–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jørgensen, T. and Marden, A., “Two doubly degenerate groups”, Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser. (2) 30:118 (1979), 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jørgensen, T. and Marden, A., “Algebraic and geometric convergence of Kleinian groups”, Math. Scand. 66:1 (1990), 47–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jørgensen, T., Lascurain, A. and Pignataro, T., “Translation extensions of the classical modular group”, Complex Variables Theory Appl. 19:4 (1992), 205–209.Google Scholar

Kahn, J. and Markovic, V., “The good pants homology and a proof of the Ehrenpreis conjecture”, Ann. of Math., to appear.

Kahn, J. and Markovic, V., “Immersing almost geodesic surfaces in a closed hyperbolic 3- manifold”, Ann. of Math. 175 (2012a), 1127–1190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahn, J. and Markovic, V., “Counting essential surfaces in a closed hyperbolic 3-manifold”, Geometry & Topology 16 (2012b). 601–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kamishima, Y. and Tan, S. P., “Deformation spaces on geometric structures”, pp. 263–299 in Aspects of low-dimensional manifolds, Adv. Stud. Pure Math. 20, Kinokuniya, Tokyo, 1992.Google Scholar

Kapovich, M., “Hyperbolic manifolds and discrete groups”, Progress in Mathematics 183, Birkhäuser, Boston, 2001.Google Scholar

Kapovich, M., “Kleinian groups in higher dimensions”, Progress in Mathematics, 265 (2007), 485–562.Google Scholar

Kapovich, M., “Dirichlet fundamental domains and topology of projective varieties”, Invent. Math. 194 (2013), 631–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kazhdan, D. A. and Margulis, G. A., “A proof of Selberg's conjecture”, Mat. Sb. (N.S.) 75:(117) (1968), 163–168. In Russian; translated in Math. USSR Sbornik 4 (1968), 147–152.Google Scholar

Keen, L., Rauch, H. E. and Vasquez, A. T., “Moduli of punctured tori and the accessory parameter of Lamé's equation”, Trans. A. M. S. 255 (1979), 201–230.Google Scholar

Kellerhals, R., “Volumes of cusped hyperbolic manifolds”, Topology 37:4 (1998), 719–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kellerhals, R. and Zehrt, T., “The Gauss-Bonnet formula for hyperbolic manifolds of finite volume”, Geom. Dedicata 84:1–3 (2001), 49–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kent IV, R. P., “Skinning maps”, Duke Math. J. 151 (2010), 279–336.Google Scholar

Kerckhoff, S. P., “The asymptotic geometry of Teichmüller space”, Topology 19:1 (1980), 23–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kerckhoff, S. P., “The Nielsen realization problem”, Ann. of Math. (2) 117:2 (1983), 235–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kerckhoff, S. P., “Earthquakes are analytic”, Comment. Math. Helv. 60:1 (1985), 17–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kerckhoff, S. P., “The measure of the limit set of the handlebody group”, Topology 29:1 (1990), 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kerckhoff, S. P., “ Lines of minima in Teichmüller space”, Duke Math. J. 65 (1992), 187–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kerckhoff, S. P. and Thurston, W. P., “Noncontinuity of the action of the modular group at Bers’ boundary of Teichmüller space”, Invent. Math. 100:1 (1990), 25–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klarreich, E., “Semiconjugacies between Kleinian group actions on the Riemann sphere”, Amer. J. Math. 121:5 (1999a), 1031–1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klarreich, E., “The boundary at infinity of the curve complex and the relative mapping class group,” preprint (1999b). Available at http://www.nasw.org/users/klarreich/ research.htm.

Klein, F., “Über die sogenannte nicht-euklidische Geometrie”, Math. Ann. 4 (1871), 573–625. Page number cited in text is for the English translation, which appears in Sources of hyperbolic geometry, translated and edited by John Stillwell, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kleineidam, G. and Souto, J., “Algebraic convergence of function groups”, Comment. Math. Helv. 77:2 (2002), 244–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kleineidam, G. and Souto, J., “Ending laminations in the Masur domain”, pp. 105–129 in Kleinian groups and hyperbolic 3-manifolds (Warwick, 2001), London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser. 299, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2003.Google Scholar

Kleiner, B. and Lott, J., “Notes on Perelman's Papers”, Geometry and Topology 12 (2008), 2587–2855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kojima, S., “Isometry transformations of hyperbolic 3-manifolds”, Topology Appl. 29:3 (1988), 297–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kojima, S., “Nonsingular parts of hyperbolic 3-cone-manifolds”, pp. 115–122 in Topology and Teichmüller spaces (Katinkulta, 1995), edited by S., Kojima et al., World Scientific, River Edge, NJ, 1996.Google Scholar

Kojima, S., “Deformations of hyperbolic 3-cone-manifolds”, J. Differential Geom. 49:3 (1998), 469–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kojima, S., Mizushima, S. and Tan, S. P., “Circle packings on surfaces with projective structures: A survey”, in Spaces of kleinian groups, edited by Y., Minsky et al., London Math. Soc. Lecture Notes 329, Camb. Univ. Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Komori, Y. and Sugawa, T., “Bers embedding of the Teichmüller space of a once-punctured torus”, Conform. Geom. Dyn. 8 (2004), 115–142.Google Scholar

Korkmaz, M., “Automorphisms of complexes of curves on punctured spheres and on punctured tori”, Topology Appl. 95 (1999), 85–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Korkmaz, M., “Generating the surface mapping class group by two elements”, Trans. A.M.S. 357 (2005), 3299–3310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koundouros, S., “Universal surgery bounds on hyperbolic 3-manifolds”, Topology 43:3 (2004), 497–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kra, I., “On spaces of Kleinian groups”, Comment. Math. Helv. 47 (1972), 53–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kulkarni, R. S. and Shalen, P. B., “On Ahlfors’ finiteness theorem”, Adv. Math. 76:2 (1989), 155–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Labourie, F., Lectures on representations of surface groups, Zurich Lectures in Advanced Mathematics, EMS, 2013.

Lackenby, M. and Meyerhoff, R., “The maximal number of exceptional Dehn surgeries”, Invent. Math 191 (2013), 341–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lamping, J., Rao, R. and Pirolli, P., “A focus + content technique based on hyperbolic geometry for viewing large hierarchies”, pp. 401–408 in Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, New York, 1995.Google Scholar

Le, Thang, “Homology, torsion growth and Mahler measure”, Comment. Math. Helv. 89 (2014), 719–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Le Calvez, P., “A periodicity criterion and the section problem on the Mapping Class Group”, arXiv:1202.3106 (2012).

Lecuire, C., “Une caractérisation des laminations géodésiques mesurées de plissage des variétés hyperboliques et ses conséquences”, pp. 103–115 in Séminaire de Théorie Spectrale et Géométrie, vol. 21. Année 2002–2003, Sémin. Théor. Spectr. Géom. 21, Univ. Grenoble I, Saint, 2003.

Lecuire, C., “Bending map and strong convergence”, Available at www.math.univ-toulouse.fr/~lecuire (2004).

Lecuire, C., “Plissage des vari étés hyperboliques de dimension 3”, [Pleating of hyperbolic 3-manifolds]Invent. Math. 164 (2006), 85–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lecuire, C., “Continuity of the bending map”, Ann. Fac. Sci. Toulouse Math. (6) 17 (2008), 93–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lecuire, C., “An extension of Masur domain”, Spaces of Kleinian groups, London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser., 329, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2006, 49–56.Google Scholar

Lehner, J., “Discontinuous groups and automorphic functions”, Mathematical Surveys 8, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, 1964.Google Scholar

Lehto, O., Univalent functions and Teichmüller spaces, Graduate Texts in Mathematics 109, Springer, New York, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leininger, C. J. and McReynolds, D. B., “Seperable subgroups of mapping class groups”, Topology Appl. 154 (2007), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leininger, C., Long, D. D. and Reid, A. W., “Commensurators of finitely generated nonfree Kleinian groups”, Algebr. Geom. Topol. 11 (2011), 605–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leung, N. C. and Wan, T. Y. H., “Harmonic maps and the topology of conformally compact Einstein manifolds”, Math. Res. Lett. 8:5-6 (2001), 801–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Li, T., “Heegard surfaces and measured laminations I: The Waldhausen conjecture”, Invent. Math. 167 (2007), 135–177.Google Scholar

Li, T., “An algorithm to determine the Heegaard genus of a 3-manifold”, Geometry & Topology 15 (2011), 1029–1106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Li, T., “Rank and Genus of 3-manifolds”, J. Amer. Math. Soc., to appear.

Lickorish, W. B. R., “A representation of orientable combinatorial 3-manifolds”, Ann. of Math. 76 (1962), 531–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lickorish, W. B. R., An introduction to knot theory, Graduate Texts in Mathematics 175, Springer, New York, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liu, Y. and Markovic, V., “Homology of closed curves and surfaces in closed hyperbolic manifolds”, arXiv:mathGT/1309.7418v2 (2013).

Long, D. D., Reid, A. W. and Thistlehwaite, M., “Zariski dense surface subgroups in SL(3,Z)”, Geometry and Topology 15 (2011), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luo, F., “Automorphisms of the complex of curves I: Hyperbolicity”, Invent. Math. 138 (1999), 103–149.Google Scholar

Lyndon, R. C. and Schupp, P. E., Combinatorial Group TheoryErgebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete, 89 Springer-Verlag, Berlin, (1977).Google Scholar

Maclachlan, C. and Reid, A. W., The arithmetic of hyperbolic 3-manifolds, Graduate Texts in Mathematics 219, Springer, New York, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Magid, A., “Deformation spaces of kleinian surface groups are not locally connected”, Geometry and Topology 16 (2012), 1247–1320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Magnus, W., “Residually finite groups”, Bull. A.M.S. 75 (1969), 305–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Magnus, W., “Noneuclidean tesselations and their groups”, Pure and Applied Mathematics 61, Academic Press, New York, 1974.Google Scholar

Magnus, W., “Rings of Fricke characters and automorphism groups of free groups”, Math. Z. 170:1 (1980), 91–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maher, J., “Random Heegaard splittings” J. Topol. 3 (2010), no. 4, 997–1025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maher, J., “Random walks on the mapping class group”, Duke Math. J. 156 (2011), no. 3, 429–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marden, A., “On finitely generated Fuchsian groups”, Comment. Math. Helv. 42 (1967), 81–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marden, A., “On homotopic mappings of Riemann surfaces”, Ann. of Math. (2) 90 (1969), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marden, A., “An inequality for Kleinian groups”, pp. 295–296 in Advances in the Theory of Riemann Surfaces (Proc. Conf., Stony Brook, N.Y., 1969), Ann. of Math. Studies, No. 66, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 1971.

Marden, A., “The geometry of finitely generated kleinian groups”, Ann. of Math. (2) 99 (1974a), 383–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marden, A., “Kleinian groups and 3-dimensional topology: a survey”, pp. 108–121 in A crash course on Kleinian groups (San Francisco, CA, 1974), edited by L., Bers and I., Kra, Lecture Notes in Math. 400, Springer, Berlin, 1974b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marden, A., “Schottky groups and circles”, pp. 273–278 in Contributions to analysis (a collection of papers dedicated to Lipman Bers), Academic Press, New York, 1974c.Google Scholar

Marden, A., “Universal properties of Fuchsian groups in the Poincaré metric”, pp. 315–339 in Discontinuous groups and Riemann surfaces (College Park, MD, 1973), edited by L., Greenberg, Ann. of Math. Studies 79, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 1974d.Google Scholar

Marden, A., “Geometrically finite Kleinian groups and their deformation spaces”, pp. 259–293 in Discrete groups and automorphic functions (Cambridge, 1975), edited by W., Harvey, Academic Press, London, 1977.Google Scholar

Marden, A., “Geometric relations between homeomorphic Riemann surfaces”, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.) 3:3 (1980), 1001–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marden, A., “A proof of the Ahlfors Finiteness Theorem”, in Spaces of kleinian groups, edited by Y., Minsky et al., L.M.S. Lecture Notes 329, Camb. Univ. Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Marden, A., “Deformations of Kleinian groups”, pp. 411–446 in Handbook of Teichmüller Theory I, A., Papadopoulos, ed., European Math. Soc., Zürich, 2007.Google Scholar

Marden, A. and Markovic, V., “Characterization of plane regions that support quasiconformal mappings to their domes”, Bull. L.M.S. 39 (2008), 962–972.Google Scholar

Marden, A. and Strebel, K., “The heights theorem for quadratic differentials on Riemann surfaces”, Acta Math. 153:3-4 (1984), 153–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marden, A. and Strebel, K., “On the ends of trajectories”, pp. 195–204 in Differential geometry and complex analysis, Springer, Berlin, 1985.Google Scholar

Marden, A. and Strebel, K., “Pseudo-Anosov Teichmueller mappings”, J. Analyse Math. 46 (1986), 194–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marden, A. and Strebel, K., “A characterization of Teichmüller differentials”, J. Differential Geom. 37:1 (1993), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Margalit, D., “Automorphisms of the pants complex”, Duke Math. J. 121 (2004), 457–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Margulis, G. A., Discrete Subgroups of Semisimple Lie Groups, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete, 17, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Markovic, V., “Quasisymmetric groups”, J. Amer. Math. Soc., 19 (2006), 673–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Markovic, V., “Realization of the mapping class group by homeomorphisms”, Invent. Math. 168 (2007), 523–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Markovic, V., “Criterion for Cannon's Conjecture”, Geom. Funct. Anal. 23 (2013), 1035– 1061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Markovic, V., “Harmonic maps between 3-dimensional hyperbolic spaces”, Invent. Math., to appear.

Markovic, V., “Harmonic Maps and the Schoen Conjecture”, CalTech preprint (2015).

Markovic, V. and Sarić, D., “Teichmüller mapping class group of the universal hyperbolic solenoid”, Trans. A.M.S. 358 (2006), 2637–2650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marshall, T. H. and Martin, G. J., “Minimal co-volume hyperbolic lattices, II; Simple torsion in a Kleinian group”, Ann. of Math., 176 (2012), 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maskit, B., “A characterization of Schottky groups”, J. Analyse Math. 19 (1967), 227–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maskit, B., “The conformal group of a plane domain”, Amer. J. Math. 90 (1968), 718–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maskit, B., “On boundaries of Teichmüller spaces and on Kleinian groups, II,” Ann. of Math. (2) 91 (1970), 607–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maskit, B., “Self-maps on Kleinian groups”, Amer. J. Math. 93 (1971), 840–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maskit, B., “Intersections of component subgroups of Kleinian groups”, pp. 349–367 in Discontinuous groups and Riemann surfaces (College Park, MD, 1973), edited by L., Greenberg, Ann. of Math. Studies 79, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 1974.Google Scholar

Maskit, B., “Parabolic elements in Kleinian groups”, Ann. of Math. (2) 117:3 (1983), 659–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maskit, B., Kleinian groups, Grundlehren der MathematischenWissenschaften 287, Springer, Berlin, 1988.Google Scholar

Masur, H., “On a class of geodesics in Teichmüller space”, Ann. of Math. (2) 102:2 (1975), 205–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Masur, H., “Interval exchange transformations and measured foliations”, Ann. of Math. (2) 115:1 (1982), 169–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Masur, H., “Ergodic actions of the mapping class group”, Proc. A.M.S. 94 (1985), 455–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Masur, H., “Measured foliations and handlebodies”, Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 6:1 (1986), 99–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Masur, H., “Hausdorff dimension of the set of nonergodic foliations of a quadratic differential”, Duke math. J. 66:3 (1992), 387–442.Google Scholar

Masur, H., “Ergodic theory of translation surfaces”, pp. 527–547 in Handbook of dynamical systems 1B Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2006.Google Scholar

Masur, H. A. and Minsky, Y. N., “Geometry of the complex of curves, I: Hyperbolicity”, Invent. Math. 138:1 (1999), 103–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Masur, H. A. and Minsky, Y. N., “Geometry of the complex of curves, II: Hierarchical structure”, Geom. Funct. Anal. 10:4 (2000), 902–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Masur, H. and Schleimer, S., “The pants complex has only one end”, pp. 209–218 in Spaces of Kleinian groups, edited by Y., Minsky, M., Sakuma, C., Series, London Math. Soc. Lecture Notes 329, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2006.Google Scholar

Masur, H. A. and Scheimer, S., “The geometry of the disk complex”, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 26 (2013), 1–62.Google Scholar

Masur, H. A. and Smillie, J., “Quadratic differentials with prescribed singularities and pseudo- Anosov diffeomorphisms”, Comment. Math. Helvetici 68 (1993), 289–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Masur, H. and Tabachnikov, S., “Rational billiards and flat structures”, pp. 1015–1089 in Handbook of dynamical systems, vol. 1A, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 2002.Google Scholar

Masur, H. and Wolf, M., “Teichmüller space is not Gromov hyperbolic”, Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Ser. A I Math. 20 (1995), 259–267.Google Scholar

Masur, H. and Wolf, M., “The Weil-Petersson isometry group”, Geom. Dedicata 93 (2002), 177–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Matsuzaki, K. and Taniguchi, M., Hyperbolic manifolds and Kleinian groups, Oxford Mathematical Monographs, The Clarendon Press Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1998.Google Scholar

McCarthy, J. and Papadopoulos, A., “The mapping class group and a theorem of Masur- Wolf”, Topology Appl. 96(1996), 75–84.Google Scholar

McCarthy, J. and Papadopoulos, A., “The visual sphere of Teichmüller space and a theorem of Masur-Wolf”, Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Math. 24 (1999), 147–154.Google Scholar

McCullough, D., “Compact submanifolds of 3-manifolds with boundary”, Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser. (2) 37:147 (1986), 299–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCullough, D. and Miller, A., “Homeomorphisms of 3-manifolds with compressible boundary”, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 344, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, 1986.Google Scholar

McCullough, D., Miller, A. and Swarup, G. A., “Uniqueness of cores of noncompact 3-manifolds”, J. London Math. Soc. (2) 32:3 (1985), 548–556.Google Scholar

McMullen, C., “Iteration on Teichmüller space”, Invent. Math. 99:2 (1990), 425–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McMullen, C., “Cusps are dense”, Ann. of Math. (2) 133:1 (1991), 217–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McMullen, C. T., “Renormalization and 3-manifolds which fiber over the circle”, Ann. of Math. Stud. 142, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 1996.

McMullen, C. T., “Complex earthquakes and Teichmüller theory”, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 11:2 (1998), 283–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McMullen, C. T., “Hausdorff dimension and conformal dynamics, I: Strong convergence of Kleinian groups”, J. Differential Geom. 51:3 (1999), 471–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McMullen, C. T., “Local connectivity, Kleinian groups and geodesics on the blowup of the torus”, Invent. Math. 146:1 (2001a), 35–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McMullen, C. T., Program “lim” for computing limit sets of kleinian groups. Available at www.math.harvard.edu/~ctm/programs/ (2001b).

McMullen, C., “Rigidity of Teichmüller curves”, Math. Res. Lett. 16 (2009), 647–649.Google Scholar

McMullen, C., “Riemann surfaces, dynamics, and geometry”, Harvard Course Notes, 2014.

McShane, G., “Simple geodesics and a series constant over Teichmüller space”, Invent. Math. 132:3 (1998), 607–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meeks, III, W. H. and Yau, S-T., “The equivariant Dehn's lemma and loop theorem”, Comment. Math. Helv. 56:2 (1981), 225–239.Google Scholar

Meyerhoff, R., “A lower bound for the volume of hyperbolic 3-manifolds”, Canad. J. Math. 39:5 (1987), 1038–1056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Milnor, J., Collected papers, vol. 1, Publish or Perish, Houston, TX, 1994.Google Scholar

Milnor, J., “Towards the Poincaré conjecture and the classification of 3-manifolds”, Notices Amer. Math. Soc. 50:10 (2003), 1226–1233.Google Scholar

Minsky, Y. N., “Harmonic maps, length, and energy in Teichmüller space”, J. Differential Geom. 35 (1992), 151–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Minsky, Y. N., “Teichmüller geodesics and ends of hyperbolic 3-manifolds”, Topology 32 (1993), 625–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Minsky, Y. N., “On rigidity, limit sets, and end invariants of hyperbolic 3-manifolds”, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 7:3 (1994a), 539–588.Google Scholar

Minsky, Y. N., “On Thurston's ending lamination conjecture”, in Conf. Proc. Lecture Notes Geom. Topology 3, K., Johannson, ed., Internat. Press, Cambridge, MA, 1994b.Google Scholar

Minsky, Y. N., “The classification of punctured-torus groups”, Ann. of Math. (2) 149:2 (1999), 559–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Minsky, Y., “Kleinian groups and the complex of curves”, Geom. Top. 4 (2000), 117–148.Google Scholar

Minsky, Y. N., “Bounded geometry for Kleinian groups”, Invent. Math. 146:1 (2001), 143–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Minsky, Y., “The Classification of Kleinian surface groups, I: Models and bounds,” Ann. of Math., 171 (2010), 1–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Minsky, Y. N., “Combinatorial and geometrical aspects of hyperbolic 3-manifolds”, pp. 3–40 in Kleinian groups and hyperbolic 3-manifolds (Warwick, 2001), London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser. 299, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2003.Google Scholar

Mirzakhani, M., “Growth of the number of simple closed geodesics on hyperbolic surfaces”, Ann. Math. 168 (2008), 97–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miyachi, H., “Cusps in complex boundaries of one-dimensional Teichmüller space”, Conform. Geom. Dyn. 7 (2003), 103–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mj(Mitra), M., “Cannon-Thurston maps for hyperbolic group extensions”, Topology 37:3 (1998a), 527–538.Google Scholar

Mj(Mitra), M., “Cannon-Thurston maps for trees of hyperbolic metric spaces”, J. Differential Geom. 48:1 (1998b), 135–164.Google Scholar

Mj, M., “Ending laminations and Cannon-Thurston maps”, Geom. Funct. Anal. 24 (2014), 297–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mj, M., “Cannon-Thurston maps for kleinian groups”, arXiv:1002.0996v3[math.GT] (2011), 22pp.

Mj, M., “The Cannon-Thurston maps for surface groups”, Ann. of Math. 179 (2014), 1–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Montesinos, J. M., Classical tessellations and three-manifolds, Universitext, Springer, Berlin, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moore, R. L., “Concerning upper semi-continuous collections of continuua”, Trans. A.M.S. 27 (1927), 416–428.Google Scholar

Morgan, J.W., “On Thurston's uniformization theorem for three-dimensional manifolds”, pp. 37–125 in The Smith conjecture (New York, 1979), Pure Appl. Math. 112, Academic Press, Orlando, FL, 1984.Google Scholar

Morgan, J. W., “Recent progress on the Poincaré conjecture and the classification of 3-manifolds”, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.) 42:1 (2005), 57–78.Google Scholar

Morgan, J. and Tian, G., Ricci Flow and the Poincaré Conjecture, 3V, Clay Math. Monographs, A.M.S. (2007).