Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-13T08:28:22.286Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2021

Esther Engels Kroeker
Affiliation:
Universiteit Antwerpen, Belgium
Willem Lemmens
Affiliation:
Universiteit Antwerpen, Belgium
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abelard, Peter (1971). Ethics, trans. David Luscombe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Abramson, Kate (2001). “Sympathy and the Project of Hume’s Second Inquiry.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 83(1): 4580. https://doi.org/10.1515/agph.83.1.45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abramson, Kate (1999). “Hume on Cultural Conflicts of Values.” Philosophical Studies 94: 183–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ainslie, Donald (2007). “Character Traits and the Humean Approach to Ethics.” In Moral Psychology, edited by Tenenbaum, Sergio, 79110, New York: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Alblas, Jacques B. H. (1991). “Richard Allestree’s ‘The Whole Duty of Man’ (1658) in Holland: The Denominational and Generic Transformation of an Anglican Classic.” Dutch Review of Church History 71(1): 91104.Google Scholar
Allestree, Richard (1659). The Whole Duty of Man¸ London: Printed for T. Garthwait; Ann Arbor: ProQuest EEBO Editions.Google Scholar
Anon. (1753). Some Late Opinions Concerning the Foundations of Morality Examined, London: R. Dodsley.Google Scholar
Aristotle, (2011). Nicomachean Ethics, trans. Robert C. Bartlett and Susan D. Collins, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ashford, Elizabeth (2005). “Utilitarianism with a Humean Face.” Hume Studies 31(1) (April): 6392.Google Scholar
Baier, Annette (2010). The Cautious Jealous Virtue: Hume on Justice, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Baier, Annette (2008). “Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals: Incomparably the Best?” In A Companion to Hume, edited by Radcliffe, Elizabeth S., 293320, Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Baier, Annette (1991). A Progress of Sentiments: Reflections on Hume’s Treatise, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Baier, Annette (1979). “Good Men’s Women: Hume on Chastity and Trust.” Hume Studies 5(1) (April): 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balfour, James (1753). A Delineation of the Nature and Obligation of Morality. With Reflexions upon Mr Hume’s Book, intitled, An Inquiry concerning the Principles of Morals, 2nd ed., Edinburgh: Hamilton, Balfour, and Neill.Google Scholar
Barry, Brian (1989). Theories of Justice, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Battersby, C. (1979). “The Dialogues as Original Imitation: Cicero and the Nature of Hume’s Scepticism.” In McGill Hume Studies, edited by Norton, D. F., Capaldi, N, and Robison, W. L., 239–52, San Diego, CA: Austin Hill Press.Google Scholar
Baumstark, Moritz (2010). “Hume’s Reading of the Classics at Ninewells, 1749–51.” Journal of Scottish Philosophy 8(1): 6377.Google Scholar
Bayle, Pierre (1740). Dictionaire Historique et Critique, 5th ed., 4 vols, Amsterdam et al.: Chez P. Brunel.Google Scholar
Beauchamp, Tom L. (ed.) (1998). The Clarendon Edition of the Works of David Hume: An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy (1776/1988). A Fragment on Government, edited by Burns, J. H. and Hart, H. L. A., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Berry, Christopher (2007). “Hume’s Universalism.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 15: 535–50.Google Scholar
Besser-Jones, L. (2010). “Hume on Pride-in-Virtue: A Reliable Motive?Hume Studies 36(2): 171–92.Google Scholar
Blom, Henriette van der (2010). Cicero’s Role Models: The Political Strategy of a Newcomer, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bohlin, Henrik (2013). “Universal Moral Standards and the Problem of Cultural Relativism in Hume’s ‘A Dialogue.’” Philosophy 88: 593606.Google Scholar
Boileau, Nicolas (1857). Oeuvres Complètes de Boileau-Despréaux, Paris: Firmin-Didot Frères. https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k54009284/f727.item.r=extraordinaire.Google Scholar
Boswell, James (1971). Boswell in Extremes: 1776–1778. The Yale Edition of the Private Papers of James Boswell, London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Botwinick, Aryeh (1977). “A Case for Hume’s Nonutilitarianism.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 15(4) (October): 423–35. Project MUSE.Google Scholar
Box, M. A. (1990). The Suasive Art of David Hume, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Broad, C. D. (1930). Five Types of Ethical Theory, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, Joseph (1867/2006). Sixteen Sermons. In The Works of Joseph Butler, LL.D., London: William Teg. (Facsimile)Google Scholar
Capaldi, Nicholas (1975). David Hume: The Newtonian Philosopher, Boston, MA: Twayne.Google Scholar
Carey, Daniel (2006). Locke, Shaftesbury, and Hutcheson: Contesting Diversity in the Enlightenment and Beyond, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cicero, Marcus Tullius (2015a). On Duties (De Officiis), edited by Griffin, Miriam T., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cicero, Marcus Tullius (2015b). On Moral Ends (De Finibus), edited by Annas, Julia, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cicero, Marcus Tullius (2014). De Natura Deorum Academica, trans. H. Rackham, Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cicero, Marcus Tullius (2013). On Dutie (Offices), edited by Griffin, M. T. and Atkins, E. M., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Claydon, Tony (1996). William III and the Godly Revolution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Alix (2000). “The Notion of Moral Progress in Hume’s Philosophy: Does Hume Have a Theory of Moral Progress?Hume Studies 26: 109–27.Google Scholar
Cohen, Mendel F. (1990). “Obligation and Human Nature in Hume’s Moral Philosophy.” Philosophical Quarterly 40: 316–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohon, Rachel (2008). Hume’s Morality: Feeling and Fabrication, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cohon, Rachel (1997). “The Common Point of View in Hume’s Ethics.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57(4) (December): 827–50. www.jstor.org/stable/2953805.Google Scholar
Collier, Mark (2013). “The Humean Approach to Moral Diversity.” Journal of Scottish Philosophy 11: 4152.Google Scholar
Collins, Anthony (1713). A Discourse of Free-Thinking, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Costelloe, Timothy (2012). “The Sublime: A Short Introduction to a Long History.” In The Sublime: From Antiquity to the Present, edited by Costelloe, Timothy M., 19, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costelloe, Timothy (2007). Aesthetics and Morals in the Philosophy of David Hume, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cottle, Charles (1979). “Justice as Artificial Virtue in Hume’s Treatise.” Journal of the History of Ideas 40: 457–66.Google Scholar
Crisp, Roger (2005). “Hume on Virtue, Utility, and Morality.” In Virtue Ethics, Old and New, edited by Gardiner, Stephen M., 159–78, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Cruz-Tleugabulova, Maité (2012). “Hume on Presentation and Philosophy.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 42(S1): 6781.Google Scholar
Cummins, Phillip D. (2000). “A Puzzling Passage in ‘Why Utility Pleases.’” Hume Studies 26(1) (April): 179–81.Google Scholar
Lama, Dalai [Tenzin Gyatso] (2002). The Spirit of Peace: Teachings on Love, Compassion and Everyday Life, London: Thorsons/Harper-Collins.Google Scholar
Darwall, Stephen (1995a). The British Moralists and the Internal “Ought”: 1640–1740, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Darwall, Stephen (1995b). “Hume and the Invention of Utilitarianism.” In Hume and Hume’s Connexions, edited by Stewart, M. A. and Wright, John P., 5882, University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Darwall, Stephen (1993). “Motive and Obligation in Hume’s Ethics.” Noûs 27(4): 415–48.Google Scholar
Debes, Remy (2007a). “Humanity, Sympathy and the Puzzle of Hume’s Second Enquiry.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 15(1): 2757.Google Scholar
Debes, Remy (2007b). “Has Anything Changed? Hume’s Theory of Association and Sympathy after the Treatise.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 15(2): 313–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/09608780701240040.Google Scholar
Dees, Richard H. (1992). “Hume and the Contexts of Politics.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 30(2) (April): 219–42.Google Scholar
East, Katherine A. (2014). “Superstitionis Malleus: John Toland, Cicero, and the War on Priestcraft in Early Enlightenment England.” History of European Ideas 40(7): 965–83.Google Scholar
Emerson, Roger L. (1997). “Hume and the Bellman, Zerobabel Macgilchrist.” Hume Studies 23(1): 928.Google Scholar
Emerson, Roger L. (1994). “The ‘Affair’ at Edinburgh and the ‘Project’ at Glasgow: The Politics of Hume’s Attempts to Become a Professor.” In Hume and Hume’s Connexions, 122, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Emerson, Roger L. (1984). “Conjectural History and Scottish Philosophers.” Historical Papers 19(1): 6390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falk, W. D. (1947–8). “‘Ought’ and Motivation.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 48: 492510. Reprinted in Falk, W. D. (1986). Ought, Reasons, and Morality, 2141, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Falkenstein, Lorne (2015). “Without Gallantry and Without Jealousy: The Development of Hume’s Account of Sexual Virtues and Vices.” Hume Studies 41(2) (November): 137–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fieser, James (2004). Early Responses to Hume’s Moral Theory and Essays, Volume 1, second edition, London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Fieser, James (1999). Early Responses to Hume, Volume 1, Bristol: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
Fieser, James (1998). “Hume’s Wide View of the Virtues.” Hume Studies 14: 295312.Google Scholar
Flage, Daniel E. (1985). “Hume’s Ethics.” Philosophical Topics 13(3) (Fall): 7188. www.jstor.org/stable/43154629.Google Scholar
Forbes, Duncan (1975). Hume’s Philosophical Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fosl, Peter S. (1994). “Doubt and Divinity: Cicero’s Influence on Hume’s Religious Skepticism.” Hume Studies 20(1): 103–20.Google Scholar
Frazer, Michael. 2010. The Enlightenment of Sympathy: Justice and the Moral Sentiments in the Eighteenth Century and Today, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frykholm, Erin (2012). “The Ontology of Character Traits in Hume.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 42(S1): 8297.Google Scholar
Garrett, Aaron (2018). “Joseph Butler’s Moral Philosophy.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N., Spring 2018, Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/butler-moral.Google Scholar
Garrett, Aaron (2007). “Francis Hutcheson and the Origin of Animal Rights.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 45(2): 243–65.Google Scholar
Garrett, Aaron (2006). “Human Nature.” In The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Philosophy, edited by Haakonssen, Knud, 160233, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Garrett, Aaron, and Heydt, Colin (2015). “Moral Philosophy: Practical and Speculative.” In Scottish Philosophy in the Eighteenth Century, Volume I: Morals, Politics, Art, Religion, edited by Garrett, Aaron and Harris, James A., 77130, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Garrett, Aaron, and Sebastiani, Silvia (2017). “David Hume on Race.” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Race, edited by Zack, Naomi, 3143, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Garrett, Don (2015). Hume, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Garrett, Don (1997). Cognition and Commitment in Hume’s Philosophy, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gill, Michael B. (2014). Humean Moral Pluralism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gill, Michael B. (2006). The British Moralists on Human Nature and the Birth of Secular Ethics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gill, Michael B. (2000). “Hume’s Progressive View on Human Nature.” Hume Studies 26(1): 87108.Google Scholar
Glossop, Ronald J. (1976). “Is Hume a ‘Classical Utilitarian’?Hume Studies 2(1) (April): 116.Google Scholar
Greig, J. Y. T. (2011). The Letters of David Hume: Volume I, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haakonssen, Knud (1981). The Science of a Legislator: The Natural Jurisprudence of David Hume and Adam Smith, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hanley, Ryan Patrick (2018). “Rousseau, Smith, and Kant on Becoming Just.” In Justice, edited by Mark, LeBar, 3966, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hanley, Ryan Patrick (2011). “Hume and the Politics of Humanity.” Political Theory 39(2): 205–33.Google Scholar
Hanvelt, Marc (2012). The Politics of Eloquence, Toronto: Toronto University Press.Google Scholar
Hardin, Russell (2008). David Hume: Moral and Political Theorist, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, James (2018). “Justice in Hume’s Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals.” (ms)Google Scholar
Harris, James (2015). Hume: An Intellectual Biography, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, James (2012). “The Early Reception of Hume’s Theory of Justice.” In Philosophy and Religion in Enlightenment Britain, edited by Savage, Ruth, 210–30, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, Jonathan (1981). Hume’s Theory of Justice, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Helvétius, Claude Adrien (1810). Treatise on Man: His Intellectual Faculties and His Education, trans. Hooper, W, London: Albion Press.Google Scholar
Herdt, Jennifer A. (2013). “Artificial Lives, Providential History, and the Apparent Limits of Sympathetic Understanding.” In David Hume: Historical Thinker, Historical Writer, edited by Spencer, Mark G., 3760, University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Heydt, Colin (2017). Moral Philosophy in Eighteenth-Century Britain: God, Self, and Other, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1994). Leviathan, edited by Shapiro, Ian, New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Holden, Thomas (2010). Spectres of False Divinity: Hume’s Moral Atheism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Home, Henry (Lord Kames) (1779). Essays on the Principles of Morality and Natural Religion, Edinburgh: Printed by R. Fleming.Google Scholar
Bible, Holy (1984). New International Version, Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishing House.Google Scholar
Home, Henry (Lord Kames) (1751). Essays on the Principles of Morality and Natural Religion in Two Parts, Edinburgh: R. Fleming.Google Scholar
Hope, Simon (2010). “The Circumstances of Justice.” Hume Studies 36(2): 125–48.Google Scholar
Howard, Robert, Sir (1694). The History of Religion Written by a Person of Quality, Ann Arbor, MI and Oxford: Text Creation Partnership, 2005–12. https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/eebo/A44651.0001.001?view=toc.Google Scholar
Hume, David (2011). The Letters of David Hume, edited by Greig, J. Y. T., 2 vols, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hume, David (1779/2007). Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, edited by Coleman, Dorothy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hume, David (1778/1983a). The History of England from the Invasion of Julius Caesar to the Revolution in 1688, foreword by Todd, William B., 6 vols, rpt., Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Hume, David (1778/1983b). My Own Life: The Life of David Hume, Esq. Written by Himself. In The History of England from the Invasion of Julius Caesar to the Revolution in 1688, vol. 1, xxviixxxiv, Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Hume, David (1777/1987a). “My Own Life.” In Essays, Moral, Political, and Literary, edited by Miller, Eugene F., xxxixliii, Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Hume, David (1777/1987b). Essays, Moral, Political, and Literary, edited by Miller, Eugene F., rev. ed., Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Classics.Google Scholar
Hume, David (1757/2007). A Dissertation on the Passions: The Natural History of Religion, edited by Beauchamp, Tom L., Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hume, David (1751/1998). An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals, edited by Beauchamp, Tom L., Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hume, David (1748/1999). An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, edited by Beauchamp, Tom L., Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hume, David (1748). A True Account of the Behaviour and Conduct of Archibald Stewart: Esq; Late Lord Provost of Edinburgh. In a Letter to a Friend. London. https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/ecco/004866698.0001.000/1:3?rgn=div1;view=fulltext.Google Scholar
Hume, David (1739–40/2007). A Treatise of Human Nature, edited by Norton, David Fate and Norton, Mary J., Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hutcheson, Francis (2008). An Inquiry into the Original of Our Ideas of Beauty and Virtue in Two Treatises, edited by Leidhold, Wolfgang, Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Hutcheson, Francis (2007). A Short Introduction to Moral Philosophy, edited by Turco, Luigi, Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Hutcheson, Francis (2002). An Essay on the Nature and Conduct of the Passions and Affections, with Illustrations on the Moral Sense, edited by Garrett, Aaron, Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Jones, Pete (1982). Hume’s Sentiments: Their Ciceronian and French Context, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2012). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, 2nd ed.,Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1785/1964). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, edited by Paton, H. J., New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Smith, Kemp (1941). The Philosophy of David Hume: A Critical Study of Its Origins and Central Doctrines, London: Palgrave-Macmillan.Google Scholar
King, James T. (1981). “Hume’s Classical Theory of Justice.” Hume Studies 7: 3254.Google Scholar
King, James T. (1976). “The Place of the Language of Morals in Hume’s Second Enquiry.” In Hume: A Re-Evaluation, edited by Livingston, Donald W. and King, James T., 343–61, New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Knox, R. A. (1950). Enthusiasm, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kraal, Anders (2013). “Anglicanism, Scottish Presbyterianism, and the Irreligious Aim of Hume’s Treatise.” Hume Studies 39(2): 169–96.Google Scholar
Krause, Sharon (2004). “Hume and the (False) Luster of Justice.” Political Theory 32: 628–55.Google Scholar
Kroeker, Esther Engels (2020). “Hume’s Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals and The Whole Duty of Man.” Journal of Scottish Philosophy 18(2): 117–32.Google Scholar
Laird, John (1932). Hume’s Philosophy of Human Nature, London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Leland, John (1756). A View of the Principal Deistical Writers, Supplement, London: B. Dod.Google Scholar
Lemmens, Willem (2015). ““Sweden Is Still a Kingdom”: Convention and Political Authority in Hume’s History of England.” Hume Studies 41(1): 5772.Google Scholar
Levey, Ann (1997). “Under Constraint: Chastity and Modesty in Hume.” Hume Studies 23(2): 213–26.Google Scholar
Levy, David M., and Peart, Sandra J. (2004). “Sympathy and Approbation in Hume and Smith: A Solution to the Other Rational Species Problem.” Economics and Philosophy 20: 331–49.Google Scholar
Locke, John (1980). Second Treatise of Government, Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Locke, John (1979). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, edited by Nidditch, P. H., The Clarendon Edition of the Works of John Locke, Oxford and New York: Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Longinus, (1995). On the Sublime, trans. W. H. Fyfe and revised by Donald Russell. In Poetics, On the Sublime, On Style, 143–59, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Loptson, Peter (2012). “Hume and Ancient Philosophy.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20(4): 741–72.Google Scholar
Lucretius, Titus Carus (1910). On the Nature of Things, Oxford: Clarendon Press, https://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/2242.Google Scholar
Machiavelli, Niccolo (1998). The Prince, trans. Harvey C. Mansfield, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Machiavelli, Niccolo (1996). Discourses on Livy, trans. Harvey C. Mansfield and Nathan Tarcov, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair (1988). Whose Justice? Which Impartiality?, Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair (1965). Hume’s Ethical Writings, New York: Collier.Google Scholar
Mackie, John (1980). Hume’s Moral Theory, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Magri, Tito (1996). “Natural Obligation and Normative Motivation in Hume’s Treatise.” Hume Studies 22(2): 231–53.Google Scholar
Mandeville, Bernard (2012). An Enquiry into the Origin of Honour and the Usefulness of Christianity in War, London: Forgotten Books. (Facsimile of the 1732 edition)Google Scholar
Mandeville, Bernard (1988a). The Fable of the Bees, or Private Vices, Publick Benefits, edited by Kaye, Frederick, Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Mandeville, Bernard (1988b). “An Inquiry into the Origin of Moral Virtue.” In The Fable of the Bees, or Private Vices, Publick Benefits, edited by Kaye, Frederick, 4157, Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Martin, Marie A. (1990). “Utility and Morality: Adam Smith’s Critique of Hume.” Hume Studies 16(2) (November): 107–20.Google Scholar
Maurer, Christian (2019). Self-Love, Egoism and the Selfish Hypothesis: Ker Debates from Eighteenth-Century British Moral Philosophy, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
McArthur, Neil (2016). “Hume’s Political Philosophy.” In The Oxford Handbook of Hume, edited by Russell, Paul, 489505, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McCarty, Richard (2012). “Humean Courage.” In David Hume and Contemporary Philosophy, edited by Kasavin, Ilya, 266–77, Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
McCloskey, Laura Ann, Figueredo, Aurelio Jose, and Koss, Mary P. (1995). “The Effects of Systemic Family Violence on Children’s Mental Health.” Child Development 66: 1239–61.Google Scholar
McIntyre, Alison (2014). “Fruitless Remorses: Hume’s Critique of the Penitential Project of the Whole Duty of Man.” Hume Studies 40(2): 143–67.Google Scholar
McIntyre, Jane (1990). “Character: A Humean Account.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 72: 193206.Google Scholar
Merivale, Amyras (2019). Hume on Art, Emotion, and Superstition: A Critical Study of the Four Dissertations, New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Moore, James (2002). “Utility and Humanity: The Quest for the Honestum in Cicero, Hutcheson, and Hume.” Utilitas 14(3): 365–86.Google Scholar
Moore, James (1994). “Hume and Hutcheson.” In Hume and Hume’s Connexions, edited by Stewart, M. A. and Wright, John P., 2537, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, James (1976). “Hume’s Theory of Justice and Property.” Political Studies 24: 103–19.Google Scholar
Nelson, Sara C. (2014). “North Korean Defector Sketches Show Torture, Starvation and Death in Dictatorship’s Prisons.” Huffington Post UK, 2/19/2014. www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2014/02/19/north-korean-defector-sketches-show-torture-starvation-death-dictatorships-prisons-pictures-_n_4813889.html.Google Scholar
Neill, Elizabeth (1997). “Hume’s Moral Sublime.” British Journal of Aesthetics 37(3): 246–58.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich (1886/1989). Beyond Good and Evil, trans. Walter Kaufmann, New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary (n.d.). “Chief” entry. www.oed.com.Google Scholar
Penelhum, Terence (1992). David Hume: An Introduction to His Philosophical System, West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
Perinetti, Dario (2018). “Hume at La Flèche: Skepticism and the French Connection.Journal of the History of Philosophy 56(1): 4574.Google Scholar
Phillipson, Nicholas (2011). David Hume: The Philosopher as Historian, London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Phillipson, Nicholas (1997). “Providence and Progress: An Introduction to the Historical Thought of William Robertson.” In William Robertson and the Expansion of Empire, edited by Brown, Stewart J., 5573, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pitson, Tony (2019). “Hume and Humanity as ‘the Foundation of Morals.’” Journal of Scottish Philosophy 17(1): 3959.Google Scholar
Potkay, Adam (2000). The Passion for Happiness: Samuel Johnson and David Hume, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Potkay, Adam (1984). The Fate of Eloquence in the Age of Hume, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel von (2003). The Whole Duty of Man According to the Law of Nature, trans. Andrew Tooke, edited by Hunter, Ian and Saunders, David, Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Radcliffe, Elizabeth (2018). Hume, Passion, and Action, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, Dennis C. (2017). The Infidel and the Professor: David Hume, Adam Smith, and the Friendship That Shaped Modern Thought, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Raynor, David R. (1984). “Hume’s Abstract of Adam Smith’s Theory of Moral Sentiments.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 22(1) (January): 5179. Project MUSE.Google Scholar
Reichlin, Massimo (2016). “Hume and Utilitarianism: Another Look at an Age-Old Question.” The Journal of Scottish Philosophy 14(1) (March): 120. https://doi.org/10.3366/jsp.2016.0111.Google Scholar
Rivers, Isabel (2005). Reason, Grace and Sentiment: Shaftesbury to Hume, a Study of the Language of Religion and Ethics in England, 1660 – 1780, Vol. 1. 2 vols, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Robertson, John (2005). The Case for the Enlightenment: Scotland and Naples 1680–1760, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rogers, C. R. (1961). On Becoming a Person, Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
Rose, William (1752). “Review of Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals.” Monthly Review 6 (January): 119.Google Scholar
Rosen, Frederick (2003). Classical Utilitarianism from Hume to Mill, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Russell, Paul (2008). The Riddle of Hume’s Treatise: Skepticism, Naturalism, and Irreligion, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sabl, Andrew (2012). Hume’s Politics: Coordination and Crisis in the “History of England,” Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sagar, Paul (2018). The Opinion of Mankind: Sociability and the Theory of the State from Hobbes to Smith, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sayre-McCord, Geoffrey (2016). “Hume on the Artificial Virtues.” In The Oxford Handbook of Hume, edited by Russell, Paul, 435–69, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sayre-McCord, Geoffrey (2013). “Hume and Smith on Sympathy, Approbation, and Moral Judgment.” Social Philosophy and Policy 30(1–2) (January): 208–36. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052513000101.Google Scholar
Sayre-McCord, Geoffrey (1995). “Hume and the Bauhaus Theory of Ethics.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 20: 280–98.Google Scholar
Sayre-McCord, Geoffrey (1994). “On Why Hume’s ‘General Point of View’ Isn’t Ideal – and Shouldn’t Be.” Social Philosophy and Policy 11(1): 202–28.Google Scholar
Schofield, Philip (2003). “Jeremy Bentham’s ‘Nonsense Upon Stilts’.” Utilitas 15(1): 1.Google Scholar
Seidler, Michael (2015). “Pufendorf’s Moral and Political Philosophy.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N., Winter 2015, Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2015/entries/pufendorf-moral.Google Scholar
Selby-Bigge, L. A. (1894/1975). “Editor’s Introduction.” In Hume, David, Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals, 3rd ed., revised by Nidditch, P. H., viixxxi, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shaver, Robert (1995). “Hume’s Moral Theory?History of Philosophy Quarterly 12(3) (July): 317–31. www.jstor.org/stable/27744669.Google Scholar
Sher, Richard B. (1990). “Professors of Virtue: The Social History of the Edinburgh Moral Philosophy Chair in the Eighteenth Century.” In Studies in the Philosophy of the Scottish Enlightenment, edited by Stewart, M. A., 87126, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sherblom, Stephen A. (2012). “What Develops in Moral Development? A Model of Moral Sensibility.” Journal of Moral Education 41(1): 117–42, DOI:10.1080/03057240.2011.652603.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam (2002). The Theory of Moral Sentiments, edited by Haakonssen, Knud, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Michael (1994). The Moral Problem, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Spector, Horatio (2014). “Hume’s Theory of Justice.” Rationality, Markets, and Morals 5: 4763.Google Scholar
Spencer, Mark G. (2019). “Hume the Historian.” In The Humean Mind, edited by Coventry, Angela M. and Sager, Alexander, 287–99, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stewart, John B. (1963). The Moral and Political Philosophy of David Hume, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Stranks, C. J. (1961). Anglican Devotion, London: SCM Press Ltd.Google Scholar
Straumann, Benjamin (2015). Roman Law in the State of Nature: The Classical Foundations of Hugo Grotius’ Natural Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stuart-Buttle, Tim (2019). From Moral Philosophy to Moral Theology: Visions of Humanity from Locke to Hume, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Suderman, Jeffrey M. (2013). “Medieval Kingship and the Making of Modern Civility: Hume’s Assessment of Governance.” In David Hume: Historical Thinker, Historical Writer, edited by Spencer, Mark G., 121–42, University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Swanton, Christine (2015). The Virtue Ethics of Hume and Nietzsche, Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Taylor, Jacqueline (2015a). “Justice, Sympathy, and the Command of Our Esteem.” Diametros 44: 173–88, DOI:10.13153/diam.44.2015.769.Google Scholar
Taylor, Jacqueline (2015b). Reflecting Subjects: Passion, Sympathy, and Society in Hume’s Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Jacqueline (2013). “Hume on the Importance of Humanity.” Revue International de Philosophie 263(1): 8197.Google Scholar
Taylor, Jacqueline (2009). “Hume’s Later Moral Philosophy.” In The Cambridge Companion to Hume, edited by Norton, David Fate and Taylor, Jacqueline, 2nd ed., 311–40, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Jacqueline (2002). “Hume on the Standard of Virtue.” The Journal of Ethics 6(1) (March): 4362. www.jstor.org/stable/25115714.Google Scholar
Taylor, Jacqueline (1998). “Justice and the Foundations of Social Morality in Hume’s Treatise.” Hume Studies 24: 530.Google Scholar
Tegos, Spyridon (2013). “Hume’s Case for French Politeness: The Status of Politeness in Monarchies and Republics” (unpublished), presented at the 40th International Hume Society Conference, July 21–28, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.Google Scholar
Toland, John (1712). Cicero Illustratus, Whiston, J., Baker, S., and Robinson, J., London.Google Scholar
Tolonen, Mikko (2013). Mandeville and Hume: Anatomist of Civil Society, Oxford: Voltaire Foundation.Google Scholar
Trenchard, John (1709). The Natural History of Superstition, London: Bartholomew-Close.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard (1988). “Optics and Sceptics: The Philosophical Foundations of Hobbes’s Political Thought.” In Conscience and Casuistry in Early Modern Europe, edited by Leites, Edmund, 235–63, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Turnbull, George (2003). Observations on Liberal Education, edited by Moore, Terence, Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Van der Lugt, Mara (2016). Bayle, Jurieu, and the Dictionnaire Historique et Critique, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Villanueva Gardner, Catherine (2006). “Chastity and the Practice of the World in Hume’s Treatise.” Hume Studies 32(2) (November): 331–45.Google Scholar
Vitz, Rico (2004). “Sympathy and Benevolence in Hume’s Moral Psychology.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 42(3): 261–75.Google Scholar
Vitz, Rico (2002). “Hume and the Limits of Benevolence.” Hume Studies 28(2): 271–96.Google Scholar
Voltaire, (1965). Dictionnaire Philosophique, edited by Naves, Raymond and Benda, Julien, Paris: Garnier.Google Scholar
Wand, Bernard (1962). “Hume’s Non-Utilitarianism.” Ethics 72(3) (April): 193–96. www.jstor.org/stable/2379497.Google Scholar
Watkins, Margaret (2018). “Beyond the ‘Disease of the Learned’: Hume on Passional Disorders.” In Hume’s Moral Philosophy and Contemporary Psychology, edited by Reed, Philip A. and Vitz, Rico, 939, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Westminster Assembly of Divines (1646/1937). The Westminster Confession of Faith, edited by Carruthers, S. W., London, England: Publishing Office of the Presbyterian Church of England.Google Scholar
Wiggins, David (2006). Ethics: Twelve Lectures on the Philosophy of Morality, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Willis, André (2016). Toward a Humean True Religion, University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
Woodford, Susan (1994). “Palamedes Seeks Revenge.” The Journal of Hellenic Studies 114: 164–69. The Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies.Google Scholar
Woozley, A. D. (1978). “Hume on Justice.” Philosophical Studies 33: 8199.Google Scholar
Wright, John P. (2009). Hume’s “A Treatise of Human Nature,” Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Esther Engels Kroeker, Universiteit Antwerpen, Belgium, Willem Lemmens, Universiteit Antwerpen, Belgium
  • Book: Hume's <I>An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals</I>
  • Online publication: 08 January 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108525497.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Esther Engels Kroeker, Universiteit Antwerpen, Belgium, Willem Lemmens, Universiteit Antwerpen, Belgium
  • Book: Hume's <I>An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals</I>
  • Online publication: 08 January 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108525497.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Esther Engels Kroeker, Universiteit Antwerpen, Belgium, Willem Lemmens, Universiteit Antwerpen, Belgium
  • Book: Hume's <I>An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals</I>
  • Online publication: 08 January 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108525497.014
Available formats
×