Select Bibliography

Rob Boddice

doi:10.1017/9781108780087.008

Aenosch, Eusebius, Die Vivisektion, das grosse Verbrechen des 19. Jahrhunderts (Dresden: H. Beringer, 1899).Google Scholar

American Humane Association, Human Vivisection: A Statement and an Inquiry, 3rd edn (Fall River, MA: American Humane Association, 1900).Google Scholar

Bain, Alexander, Emotions and the Will, 3rd edn (London: Longmans, Green, 1875).Google Scholar

Bishop of Ely, Humanity and Science (London: Research Defence Society, 1910).Google Scholar

Bowditch, Henry Pickering, ‘The Advancement of Medicine by Research’, Science, 4 (1896).Google Scholar

Bruce, David, The Extinction of Malta Fever (A Lesson in the Use of Animal Experimentation) (London: Macmillan, 1908).Google Scholar

Burdon Sanderson, John, ed., Handbook for the Physiological Laboratory, by Klein, E., Burdon Sanderson, John, Foster, Michael and Brunton, Thomas Lauder, 2 vols (London: J & A Churchill, 1873).Google Scholar

Burdon Sanderson, Lady, Sir John Burdon Sanderson: A Memoir (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1911).Google Scholar

Cannon, Walter B., Animal Experimentation and Its Benefit to Mankind (Chicago: American Medical Association, 1912).Google Scholar

Cannon, Walter B., ‘Medical Control of Vivisection’, North American Review, 191 (1910): 814–21.Google Scholar

Cannon, Walter B., ‘The Right and Wrong of Making Experiments on Human Beings’, Journal of the American Medical Association, 67 (1916): 1372–3.Google Scholar

Cannon, Walter B., Some Characteristics of Antivivisection Literature (Chicago: American Medical Association, 1911).Google Scholar

Cannon, Walter B., The Way of an Investigator: A Scientist’s Experiences in Medical Research (New York: W. W. Norton, 1945).Google Scholar

Churchman, John W., ‘The Value of Animal Experimentation as Illustrated by Recent Advances in the Study of Syphilis’ (Chicago: American Medical Association, 1911).Google Scholar

Clover, George F., Animal Experimentation as Viewed by the Superintendent of a Hospital (New York: Medical Society of the State of New York, 1909).Google Scholar

Curtis, John G., Why Are Special Laws to Restrict Animal Experimentation Unwise? (New York: Medical Society of the State of New York, 1909).Google Scholar

Cushny, A. R., ‘Vivisecton and Medicine: Have Experiments on Animals Advanced Therapeutics’ (1908).Google Scholar

Dana, Charles L., The Service of Animal Experimentation to the Knowledge and Treatment of Nervous Diseases (New York: Medical Society of the State of New York, 1909).Google Scholar

Darwin, Charles, The Descent of Man (London: John Murray, 1871).Google Scholar

Darwin, Francis, ed., The Life and Letters of Charles Darwin, 3 vols (London: John Murray, 1887).Google Scholar

Darwin, Francis, and Seward, A. C., eds, More Letters of Charles Darwin (London: John Murray, 1903).Google Scholar

Dewey, John, The Ethics of Animal Experimentation (New York: Medical Society of the State of New York, 1909).Google Scholar

Dunn, Charles Hunter, Animal Experimentation in Relation to Epidemic Cerebrospinal Meningitis (Chicago: AMA, 1911).Google Scholar

Eliot, Charles W., ‘Animal Experimentation’, in Animal Experimentation: A Series of Statements Indicating Its Value to Biological and Medical Science, ed. Ernst, Harold C., 1–3 (Boston: Little, Brown, 1902).Google Scholar

Ernst, , Harold C., ed., Animal Experimentation: A Series of Statements Indicating Its Value to Biological and Medical Science (Boston: Little, Brown, 1902).Google Scholar

Ewing, James, Animal Experimentation and Cancer (New York: Medical Society of the State of New York, 1908).Google Scholar

Ferrier, David, ‘The Croonian Lecture – Experiments on the Brain of Monkeys’ [read by John Burdon Sanderson], Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 165 (1875): 433–88.Google Scholar

Flexner, Simon, Animal Experimentation and Infectious Diseases (New York: Medical Society of the State of New York, 1908).Google Scholar

Flexner, Simon, The So-Called ‘Affidavits Concerning the Atrocities of Vivisection’: A Refutation. Pamphlet, reprinted from New York Times (17 January 1910).Google Scholar

Foerster, Paul, Die Vivisektion, die wissenschafltliche Tierfolter (Munich: Kupferschmid, 1913).Google Scholar

Foerster, Paul, Die Vivisektion: ein Wort zur Verständigung und Mahnung, gerichtet an die vom 17. bis 24. Juli in Paris versammelten Vertreter des Tierschutzes von Dr. Paul Förster (Berlin: Tierschutz-Verein in Comm., 1900).Google Scholar

Gay, Frederick P., Immunology: A Medical Science Developed through Animal Experimentation (Chicago: AMA, 1910).Google Scholar

Goltz, Friedrich, Wider die Humanaster. Rechtfertigung eines Vivisektors (Strassburg: Hansard, 1883).Google Scholar

Harnack, Erich, Tierschutz und Vivisektion (Berlin: Hüpeden & Merzyn, 1906).Google Scholar

Hatcher, Robert A., Animal Experimentation and the Actions of Drugs (New York: Medical Society of the State of New York, 1909)Google Scholar

Heidenhain, Rudolf, Die Vivisection im Dienste der Heilkunde, 2nd edn (Leipzig, 1879).Google Scholar

Hendrick, Burton J., ‘American Contributions to Medical Science’, Harper’s Monthly, 129 (1914): 25–32.Google Scholar

Hendrick, Burton J., ‘Conquering Spinal Meningitis: What the Rockefeller Institute Has Done for Children’, McClure’s Magazine, 32 (1909): 594–604.Google Scholar

Hendrick, Burton J., ‘Work at the Rockefeller Institute: The Transplanting of Animal Organs’, McClure’s Magazine, 32 (1909): 367–83.Google Scholar

Hermann, L., Die Vivisectionsfrage. Für das grössere Publicum beleuchtet (Leipzig: F. C. W. Vogel, 1877).Google Scholar

Hodge, C. F., ‘The Vivisection Question’. Reprinted from Appleton’s Popular Science Monthly (September/October 1896).Google Scholar

Huxley, Julian, ‘The Tissue-Culture King’, Cornhill Magazine, new series 60 (1926): 422–58.Google Scholar

Huxley, Leonard, ed., Life and Letters of Thomas Henry Huxley, 2nd edn, 3 vols (London: Macmillan, 1913).Google Scholar

Huxley, T. H., Collected Essays (London: Macmillan, 1894).Google Scholar

Huxley, T. H., Method and Results: Essays (New York: D. Appleton, 1898).Google Scholar

Iatros, [Ernst Grysanowski], Die Vivisektion, ihr wissenschaftlicher Wert und ihre ethische Berechtigung (Leipzig, 1877).Google Scholar

Keen, W. W., Animal Experimentation and Medical Progress (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1914).Google Scholar

Keen, W. W., The Influence of Antivivisection on Character (Chicago: AMA, 1912).Google Scholar

Keen, W. W., ‘The Inveracities of Antivivisection’, Journal of the American Medical Association, 67 (1916): 1390–91.Google Scholar

Keen, W. W., ‘Recent Surgical Progress: A Result Chiefly of Experimental Research’, Harper’s Monthly, 118 (1909): 764–73Google Scholar

Kirchwey, George W., The Legal Aspect of Animal Experimentation in the State of New York (New York: Medical Society of the State of New York, 1909).Google Scholar

Laab, Artur, Fort mit der Vivisektion! Fort mit den experimentellen Mißbräuchen and lebenden Menschen und Tieren!; Ein ernster Mahnruf and die Menschheit (Graz: Verl. des Bundes gegen die Vivisektion in Österreich, 1905).Google Scholar

Lee, F. S., The Publications of the New York Anti-Vivisection Society (New York: Medical Society of the State of New York, 1909).Google Scholar

Lee, F. S., ‘The Role of Experiment in Medicine: The Public and the Medical Profession’, in Scientific Features of Modern Medicine, 154–76 (New York: Columbia University Press, 1911).CrossRef Google Scholar

Lee, F. S., The Sense of Pain in Man and the Lower Animals (New York: Medical Society of the State of New York, 1908).Google Scholar

Lubarsch, Otto, Über die sogenannte Vivisektion (Halle: C. Marhold, 1905).Google Scholar

Ludwig, C., ‘Die “Vivisection” vor dem Richterstuhl der Gegenwart: Ein Wort zur Vermittelung’, Die Gartenlaube (1879): 417–19.Google Scholar

Lusk, Graham, Animal Experimentation and Diabetes (New York: Medical Society of the State of New York, 1909).Google Scholar

Mac Cormac, William, ed., Transactions of the International Medical Congress (London, J. W. Kolckmann, 1881).Google Scholar

Meltzer, S. J., The Function of the Thyroid Glands: An Important Chapter in Modern Medicine Based upon Animal Experimentation (New York: Medical Society of the State of New York, 1909).Google Scholar

Mendel, Lafayette B., Animal Experimentation and Nutrition (New York: Medical Society of the State of New York, 1909).Google Scholar

Milena, Elpis [Marie-Espérance von Schwartz], Gemma oder Tugend and Laster (Franz, 1877).Google Scholar

Moore, Veranus A., The Relation of Animal Experimentation to the Live Stock Industry (New York: Medical Society of the State of New York, 1909).Google Scholar

Oeffentliche Disputation über die Vivisektion, gehalten im Physiologischen Institute der Universität Bern am 31. Januar 1903: Nebst einem Vorwort (Dresden: Internat. Ver. z. Bekämpfung d. wiss. Tierfolter, 1904).Google Scholar

Official Circular Addressed to the German Universities by the Minister of Public Instruction Enjoining Safeguards against Abuses of Vivisection, with an Appendix Containing the Statements of the Several Medical Faculties (London: J. W. Kolckmann, 1885).Google Scholar

Paget, James, Owen, Richard and Wilks, Samuel, ‘Vivisection: Its Pains and Its Uses’, Nineteenth Century, 10 (1881): 902–48.Google Scholar

Paget, Stephen, Experiments on Animals (London: T. Fisher Unwin, 1900).Google Scholar

Paget, Stephen, ed., For and Against Experiments on Animals: Evidence before the Royal Commission on Vivisection (London: H. K. Lewis, 1912).Google Scholar

Park, William H., ‘Animal Experimentation and Diphtheria’ (1909).Google Scholar

Philanthropos, [Gerald Yeo], Physiological Cruelty: or, Fact v. Fancy. An Inquiry into the Vivisection Question (London: Tinsley Bros., 1883).Google Scholar

Research Defence Society, Evidence of Lord Justice Fletcher Moulton before the Royal Commission on Vivisection (London: Macmillan, 1908).Google Scholar

Romanes, E., The Life and Letters of George John Romanes, New edn (London: Longmans, Green, 1896).Google Scholar

Rutherford, William, ‘The Chief Medical Schools of the Continent’, Edinburgh Medical Journal, 11 (1865): 341–47.Google Scholar PubMed

Schurman, Jacob Gould, President Schurman on Animal Experimentation (New York: Medical Society of the State of New York, 1909).Google Scholar

Simon, John, ‘An Address Delivered at the Opening of the Section of Public Medicine’, British Medical Journal (August 6, 1881): 219–23.Google Scholar

Simon, John, English Sanitary Institutions, 2nd edn (London: John Murray, 1897).Google Scholar

Spencer, Herbert, Principles of Psychology (1899; Osnabrück: Otto Zeller, 1966).Google Scholar

Stenz, Hermann, Die Vivisektion, der wissenschaftliche Wahnsinn unserer Zeit: kurze Darlegung der Unhaltbarkeit, Verwerflichkeit und allgemeinen Schädlichkeit, sowie die Entbehrlichkeit des Folterns lebender Tiere zu wissenschaftlichen Zwecken (Dresden: Weltbund gegen d. Vivisektion, 1900).Google Scholar

Trudeau, Edward L., Animal Experimentation and Tuberculosis (New York: Medical Society of the State of New York, 1909).Google Scholar

UK Parliament, Appendix to the First Report of the Commissioners, C. 3326 (1907).Google Scholar

UK Parliament, Appendix to the Fourth Report of the Commissioners, C. 3955 (1908).Google Scholar

UK Parliament, Appendix to the Third Report of the Commissioners, C. 3757 (1907).Google Scholar

UK Parliament, Final Report of the Departmental Committee on Tuberculosis, C. 6641 (1913).Google Scholar

UK Parliament, Final Report of the Royal Commission Appointed to Inquire into the Relation of Human and Animal Tuberculosis, C. 5761 (1911).Google Scholar

UK Parliament, Report of the Royal Commission on the Practice of Subjecting Live Animals to Experiments for Scientific Purposes, C. 1397 (1876).Google Scholar

US Government, Vivisection: Hearing before the Senate Committee on the District of Columbia, February 21, 1900, on the Bill (S. 34) for the Further Prevention of Cruelty to Animals in the District of Columbia (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1900).Google Scholar

Weber, Ernst, von, Die Folterkammern der Wissenschaft. Eine Sammlung von Thatsachen für das Laien-Publikum (Berlin, 1879).Google Scholar

Welch, W. H., ‘The Interdependence of Medicine and Other Sciences of Nature’, in Papers and Addresses, 3:315–33 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1920).Google Scholar

Welch, William H., ‘On Some of the Humane Aspects of Medical Science’, in Papers and Addresses, 3:3–8 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1920).Google Scholar

Wells, H. G., The Island of Dr Moreau (London: Heinemann, 1896).Google Scholar

Wilde, Oscar, The Picture of Dorian Gray (1891; New York: Mondial, 2015).Google Scholar

Wile, Udo, ‘Experimental Syphilis in the Rabbit Produced by the Brain Substance of the Living Paretic’, Journal of Experimental Medicine, 23 (1916): 199–202.Google Scholar

Wolf, Richard, Mensch, Tier und Vivisektion (Leipzig: Altmann, [1900]).Google Scholar

Arluke, Arnold, and Sax, Boria, ‘Understanding Nazi Animal Protection and the Holocaust’, Anthrozoös, 5 (1992): 6–31.Google Scholar

Asdal, Kristin, ‘Subjected to Parliament: The Laboratory of Experimental Medicine and the Animal Body’, Social Studies of Science, 38 (2008): 899–917.Google Scholar

Atalic, Bruno, and Fatovic-Ferencic, Stella, ‘Emanuel Edward Klein – The Father of British Microbiology and the Case of the Animal Vivisection Controversy of 1875’, Toxicologic Pathology, 37 (2009): 708–13.Google Scholar

Barton, Ruth, ‘Men of Science: Language, Identity and Professionalization in the Mid-Victorian Scientific Community’, History of Science, 41:1 (2003): 73–119.Google Scholar

Bates, A. W. H., Anti-Vivisection and the Profession of Medicine in Britain (London: Palgrave, 2017).Google Scholar

Beers, Diane L., For the Prevention of Cruelty: The History and Legacy of Animal Rights Activism in the United States (Ohio: Swallow Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Bellon, Richard, ‘Joseph Dalton Hooker’s Ideals for a Professional Man of Science’, Journal of the History of Biology, 34:1 (2001): 73–119.CrossRef Google Scholar

Benison, Saul, ‘Simon Flexner: The Evolution of a Career in Medical Science,’ Institute to University.Google Scholar

Berkowitz, Carin, ‘Disputed Discovery: Vivisection and Experiment in the 19th Century’, Endeavour, 30 (2006): 98–102.Google Scholar

Beromeu-Sánchez, José Ramón, ‘Animal Experiments, Vital Forces and Courtrooms: Mateu Orfila, François Magendie and the Study of Poisons in Nineteenth-Century France’, Annals of Science, 69 (2012): 1–26.Google Scholar

Bittel, Carla, ‘Science, Suffrage, and Experimentation: Mary Putnam Jacobi and the Controversy over Vivisection in Late Nineteenth-Century America’, Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 79 (2005): 664–94.Google Scholar

Bliss, Michael, William Osler: A Life in Medicine (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Boddice, Rob, A History of Attitudes and Behaviours toward Animals in Eighteenth- and Nineteenth-Century Britain: Anthropocentrism and the Emergence of Animals (Lewiston: Mellen, 2009).Google Scholar

Boddice, Rob, A History of Feelings (London: Reaktion, 2019).Google Scholar

Boddice, Rob, ‘Bestiality in a Time of Smallpox: Dr Jenner and the “Modern Chimera”’, in Exploring Animal Encounters: Philosophical, Cultural and Historical Perspectives, ed. Ohrem, Dominik and Calarco, Matthew, 155–78 (London: Palgrave, 2018).Google Scholar

Boddice, Rob, ‘The End of Anthropocentrism’, in Anthropocentrism: Humans, Animals, Environments, ed. Boddice, Rob, 1–18 (Leiden: Brill, 2011).Google Scholar

Boddice, Rob, ‘German Methods, English Morals: Physiological Networks and the Question of Callousness, c.1870–1881’, in Anglo-German Scholarly Relations in the Long Nineteenth Century, ed. Ellis, Heather and Kirchberger, Ulrike, 84–102 (Leiden: Brill, 2014).CrossRef Google Scholar

Boddice, Rob, ‘The Historical Animal Mind: “Sagacity” in Nineteenth-Century Britain’, in Experiencing Animals: Encounters between Animal and Human Minds, ed. Mitchell, Robert W. and Smith, Julie, 65–78 (New York: Columbia University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Boddice, Rob, The History of Emotions (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2018).Google Scholar

Boddice, Rob, ‘The Moral Status of Animals and the Historical Human Cachet’, JAC: A Journal of Rhetoric, Culture and Politics, 30:3–4 (2010): 457–89.Google Scholar

Boddice, Rob, The Science of Sympathy: Morality, Evolution and Victorian Civilization (Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Boddice, Rob, ‘Species of Compassion: Aesthetics, Anaesthetics and Pain in the Physiological Laboratory’, 19: Interdisciplinary Studies in the Long Nineteenth Century, 15 (2012).Google Scholar

Boddice, Rob, ‘Vivisecting Major: A Victorian Gentleman Scientist Defends Animal Experimentation, 1876–1885’, Isis, 102 (2011): 215–37.Google Scholar

Boddice, Rob, and Smith, Mark, Emotion, Sense, Experience (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020).Google Scholar

Bourke, Joanna, The Story of Pain: From Prayer to Painkillers (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Bourke, Joanna, What It Means to Be Human: Reflections from 1791 to the Present (London: Virago, 2011).Google Scholar

Bowler, Peter J., ‘Lankester, Sir (Edwin) Ray (1847–1929)’, in Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Bretschneider, H., Der Streit um die Vivisektion im 19. Jahrhundert. Verlauf – Argumente – Ergebnisse (Stuttgart, 1962).Google Scholar

Brock, D. Heyward, ‘The Doctor as Dramatic Hero’, Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 34 (1991): 279–95.Google Scholar

Bryder, Linda, ‘Tuberculosis and the MRC’, in Historical Perspectives on the Role of the MRC: Essays in the History of the Medical Research Council of the United Kingdom and Its Predecessor, the Medical Research Committee, 1913–1953, ed. Austoker, Joan and Bryder, Linda, 1–21 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Buettinger, Craig, ‘Antivivisection and the Charge of Zoophil-Psychosis in the Early Twentieth Century’, The Historian, 55 (1992): 277–88.Google Scholar

Buettinger, Craig, ‘Women and Antivivisection in Late Nineteenth-Century America’, Journal of Social History, 30 (1997): 857–72.Google Scholar

Butler, Stella V. F., ‘Centers and Peripheries: The Development of British Physiology, 1870–1914’, Journal of the History of Biology, 21 (1988): 473–500.Google Scholar

Catlet, Stephen, ‘Huxley, Hutton and the “White Rage”: A Debate on Vivisection at the Metaphysical Society’, Archives of Natural History, 11 (1983): 181–9.Google Scholar

Colby, Robert A., ‘“How It Strikes a Contemporary”: The “Spectator” as Critic’, Nineteenth-Century Fiction, 11 (1956): 182–206.Google Scholar

Corner, George W., A History of the Rockefeller Institute 1901–1953, Origins and Growth (New York: Rockefeller Institute Press, 1964).Google Scholar

Cunningham, Andrew, and Williams, Perry, eds, The Laboratory Revolution in Medicine (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Cushing, Harvey, The Life of Sir William Osler (Oxford, 1940).Google Scholar

Daston, Lorraine, and Galison, Peter, Objectivity (New York: Zone Books, 2007).Google Scholar

Davis, John, ‘Higher Education Reform and the German Model: A Victorian Discourse’, in Anglo-German Scholarly Relations in the Long Nineteenth Century, ed. Ellis, Heather and Kirchberger, Ulrike, 39–62 (Leiden: Brill, 2014).CrossRef Google Scholar

Dror, Otniel, ‘The Affect of Experiment: The Turn to Emotions in Anglo-American Physiology, 1900–1940’, Isis, 90 (1999): 205–37.Google Scholar

Elston, Mary Ann, ‘The Anti-Vivisectionist Movement and the Science of Medicine’, in Challenging Medicine, ed. Gabe, Jonathan, Kelleher, David and Williams, Gareth, 160–80 (London: Routledge, 1994).Google Scholar

Elston, Mary Ann, ‘Women and Anti-Vivisection in Victorian England, 1870–1900’, in Vivisection in Historical Perspective, ed. Rupke, Nicolaas A., 259–94 (London: Croom Helm, 1987).Google Scholar

Flexner, James Thomas, An American Saga: The Story of Helen Thomas and Simon Flexner (New York: Fordham University Press, 1993).Google Scholar

French, Richard D., Antivivisection and Medical Science in Victorian Society (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1975).Google Scholar

Friedman, David M., The Immortalists; Charles Lindbergh, Dr. Alexis Carrel, and Their Daring Quest to Live Forever (New York: Harper, 2007).Google Scholar

Fye, W. Bruce, ‘Carl Ludwig and the Leipzig Physiological Institute: “A Factory of New Knowledge”’, Circulation, 74 (1986): 920–28.Google Scholar

Fye, W. Bruce, The Development of American Physiology: Scientific Medicine in the Nineteenth Century (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1987).Google Scholar

Geison, Gerald L., Michael Foster and the Cambridge School of Physiology: The Scientific Enterprise in Late Victorian Society (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1978).Google Scholar

Gere, Cathy, Pain, Pleasure, and the Greater Good: From the Panopticon to the Skinner Box and Beyond (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Geroulanos, Stephanos, and Meyers, Todd, The Human Body in the Age of Catastrophe: Brittleness, Integration, Science, and the Great War (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2018).CrossRef Google Scholar

Gest, Howard, ‘Dr. Martin Arrowsmith: Scientist and Medical Hero’, Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 35 (1991): 116–24.Google Scholar

Gill, Rebecca, Calculating Compassion: Humanity and Relief in War, Britain, 1870–1914 (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Gollin, Alfred M., The Observer and J. L. Garvin, 1908–1914 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1960).Google Scholar

Goodman, Jordan, and McElligot, Anthony, eds, Useful Bodies: Humans in the Service of Medical Science in the Twentieth Century (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Gossel, Patricia Peck, ‘William Henry Welch and the Antivivisection Legislation in the District of Columbia, 1896–1900’, Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, 40 (1985): 397–419.Google Scholar

Gradmann, Christoph, ‘“It Seemed about Time to Try One of Those Modern Medicines”: Animal and Human Experimentation in the Chemotherapy of Sleeping Sickness 1905–1908’, in Twentieth Century Ethics of Human Subjects Research: Historical Perspectives on Values, Practices, and Regulations, ed. Roelcke, Volker, 83–97 (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 2004).Google Scholar

Guarnieri, Patrizia, ‘Moritz Schiff (1823–96): Experimental Physiology and Noble Sentiment in Florence’, in Vivisection in Historical Perspective, ed. Rupke, Nicolaas A., 105–24 (London: Croom Helm, 1987).Google Scholar

Halttunen, Karen, ‘Humanitarianism and the Pornography of Pain in Anglo-American Culture’, American Historical Review, 100 (1995): 303–34.Google Scholar

Halverson, Kristin, ‘Physiological Cruelty? Discussing and Developing Vivisection in Great Britain, 1875–1901’, MA thesis, Södertörn University (2016).Google Scholar

Hamilton, Susan, ‘Reading and the Popular Critique of Science in the Victorian Anti-Vivisection Press: Frances Power Cobbe’s Writing for the Victoria Street Society’, Victorian Review, 36 (2010): 66–79.Google Scholar

Hansen, Bert, ‘Medical History for the Masses: How American Comic Books Celebrated Heroes of Medicine in the 1940s’, Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 78 (2004): 148–91.Google Scholar

Hanson, Elizabeth, ‘Women Scientists at the Rockefeller Institute, 1901–1940’, in Creating a Tradition of Biomedical Research: Contributions to the History of the Rockefeller University, ed. Stapleton, Darwin H., 211–25 (New York: Rockefeller University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Haskell, Thomas L., ‘Capitalism and the Origins of the Humanitarian Sensibility’, parts I and II, American Historical Review, 90 (1985): 339–61, 547–66.Google Scholar

Hochschild, Arlie Russel, The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983).Google Scholar

Honigsbaum, Frank, ‘Christopher Addison: A Realist in Pursuit of Dreams’, in Doctors, Politics and Society: Historical Essays, ed. Porter, Dorothy and Porter, Roy, 229–46 (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1993).Google Scholar

Hornsby, Asha, ‘Unfeeling Brutes? The 1875 Royal Commission on Vivisection and the Science of Suffering’, Victorian Review, 45 (2019): 97–115.Google Scholar

Hutchison, John, Champions of Charity: War and the Rise of the Red Cross (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Institute to University: A Seventy-Fifth Anniversary Colloquium, June 8, 1976 (New York: Rockefeller University, 1976).Google Scholar

‘John C. Dalton, Jr. (1825–1889) Experimental Physiologist’, Journal of the American Medical Association, 203 (1968): 221–22.Google Scholar

Kean, Hilda, ‘“The Smooth Cool Men of Science”: The Feminist and Socialist Response to Vivisection’, History Workshop Journal, 40 (1995): 16–38.Google Scholar

Lambert, R., Sir John Simon, 1816–1904 and English Social Administration (London: MacGibbon & Kee, 1963).Google Scholar

Landecker, Hannah, Culturing Life: How Cells Became Technologies (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Landsborough Thomson, A., ‘Origin of the British Legislative Provision for Medical Research’, Journal of Social Policy, 2 (1973): 41–54.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lansbury, Coral, The Old Brown Dog: Women, Workers and Vivisection in Edwardian England (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1985).Google Scholar

Lederer, Susan, ‘The Controversy over Animal Experimentation in America, 1880–1914’, in Vivisection in Historical Perspective, ed. Rupke, Nicolaas, 236–58 (London: Croom Helm, 1987).Google Scholar

Lederer, Susan, ‘Hideyo Noguchi’s Luetin Experiment and the Antivivisectionists’, Isis, 76 (1985): 31–48.Google Scholar

Lederer, Susan, ‘Orphans as Guinea Pigs: American Children and Medical Experimenters, 1890–1930’, in In the Name of the Child: Health and Welfare, 1880–1940, ed. Cooter, Roger, 96–123 (New York: Routledge, 2013).Google Scholar

Lederer, Susan, ‘Political Animals: The Shaping of Biomedical Research Literature in Twentieth-Century America’, Isis, 83 (1992): 61–79.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lederer, Susan, Subjected to Science: Human Experimentation in America before the Second World War (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Lemov, Rebecca, World as Laboratory: Experiments with Mice, Mazes, and Men (New York: Hill and Wang, 2006).Google Scholar

Leroy, Gaylord C., ‘Richard Holt Hutton’, PMLA, 56 (1941): 809–40.Google Scholar

Libell, Monica, Morality beyond Humanity: Schopenhauer, Grysanowski, and Schweitzer on Animal Ethics (Lund, 2001).Google Scholar

Loveridge, Ann, ‘Historical, Fictional and Illustrative Readings of the Vivisected Body 1873–1913’, doctoral thesis, Canterbury Christ Church University (2017).Google Scholar

Lyons, Dan, ‘Protecting Animals versus the Pursuit of Knowledge: The Evolution of the British Animal Research Policy Process’, Society & Animals, 19 (2011): 356–67.CrossRef Google Scholar

MacNalty, Arthur Salusbury, Sir William Collins, Surgeon and Statesman (London: Chadwick Trust, 1949).Google Scholar

Maehle, Andreas Holger, Doctors, Honour and the Law: Medical Ethics in Imperial Germany (Houndmills, UK: Palgrave, 2009).Google Scholar

Maehle, Andreas-Holger, ‘The Ethical Discourse on Animal Experimentation, 1650–1900’, in Doctors and Ethics: The Earlier Historical Setting of Professional Ethics, ed. Wear, A., Geyer-Kordesch, J. and French, R., 203–51. The Wellcome Series in the History of Medicine, Clio Medica, vol. 24 (Amsterdam, 1993).Google Scholar

Maehle, Andreas-Holger, ‘Organisierte Tierversuchsgegner: Gründe und Grenzen ihrer gesellschaftlichen Wirkung, 1879–1933’, in Medizinkritische Bewegungen im Deutschen Reich (ca. 1870–ca. 1933), ed. Dinges, M., 109–25. Medizin, Gesellschaft und Geschichte suppl. vol. 9 (Stuttgart, 1996).Google Scholar

Mayer, Jed, ‘The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Laboratory Animals’, Victorian Studies, 50:3 (2008): 399–417.Google Scholar

McKellar, Shelley, ‘Innovation in Modern Surgery: Alexis Carrel and Blood Vessel Repair’, in Creating a Tradition of Biomedical Research: Contributions to the History of the Rockefeller University, ed. Stapleton, Darwin H., 131–50 (New York: Rockefeller University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Mckibbin, Ross, ‘Politics and the Medical Hero: A.J. Cronin’s The Citadel’, English Historical Review, 123 (2008): 651–78.Google Scholar

Miller, Ian, ‘Necessary Torture? Vivisection, Suffragette Force-Feeding, and Responses to Scientific Medicine in Britain c. 1870–1920’, Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, 64 (2009): 333–72.Google Scholar

Morantz, Regina Markell, ‘Feminism, Professionalism, and Germs: The Thought of Mary Putnam Jacobi and Elizabeth Blackwell’, American Quarterly, 34 (1982): 459–78.Google Scholar

Morgan, K., ‘Addison, Christopher, First Viscount Addison (1869–1951), Politician’, in Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Moruno, Dolores Martín, Edgar, Brenda Lynn and Leyder, Marie, ‘Feminist Perspectives on the History of Humanitarian Relief (1870–1945)’, Medicine, Conflict and Survival, 36 (2020): 2–18.Google Scholar

Neff, Roland, Der Streit um den wissenschaftlichen Tierversuch in der Schweiz des 19. Jahrhunderts (Basel: Schwabe, 1989).Google Scholar

Otis, Laura, ‘“Howled out of the Country”: Wilkie Collins and H.G. Wells Retry David Ferrier’, in Neurology and Literature, 1860–1920, ed. Stiles, Anne, 27–51 (Houndmills, UK: Palgrave, 2007).Google Scholar

Preece, Rod, ‘Darwin, Christianity and the Great Vivisection Debate’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 64 (2003): 399–419.Google Scholar

Richards, Stewart, ‘Anaesthetics, Ethics and Aesthetics: Vivisection in the Late Nineteenth-Century British Laboratory’, in The Laboratory Revolution in Medicine, ed. Cunningham, Andrew and Williams, Perry, 142–69 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Richards, Stewart, ‘Drawing the Life-Blood of Physiology: Vivisection and the Physiologists’ Dilemma, 1870–1900’, Annals of Science, 43 (1986): 27–56.Google Scholar

Robb-Smith, A. H. T., ‘Medical Education’, in The History of the University of Oxford, ed. Brock, M. G. and Curthoys, M. C., 6: 563–82 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Romano, Terrie M., Making Medicine Scientific: John Burdon Sanderson and the Culture of Victorian Science (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Rosenberg, Charles E., ‘Martin Arrowsmith: The Scientists as Hero’, American Quarterly, 15 (1963): 447–58.Google Scholar

Ross, Karen D., ‘Recruiting “Friends of Medical Progress”: Evolving Tactics in the Defense of Animal Experimentation, 1910s and 1920s’, Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, 70 (2015): 365–93.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Rupke, Nicolaas, ‘Pro-Vivisection in England in the Early 1880s: Arguments and Motives’, in Vivisection in Historical Perspective, ed. Rupke, Nicolaas, 188–208 (London: Croom Helm, 1987).Google Scholar

Rupke, Nicolaas, ed., Vivisection in Historical Perspective (London: Croom Helm, 1987).Google Scholar

Salvatici, Silvia, A History of Humanitarianism, 1755–1989: In the Name of Others (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2019).Google Scholar

Sauerteig, Lutz, ‘Ethische Richtlinien, Patientenrechte and ärztliches Verhalten bei der Arzneimittelerprobung (1892–1931)’, Medizinhistorisches Journal, 35 (2000): 303–34.Google Scholar

Sax, Boria, Animals in the Third Reich: Pets, Scapegoats, and the Holocaust (New York: Continuum, 2000).Google Scholar

Schickore, Jutta, About Method: Experimenters, Snake Venom, and the History of Writing Scientifically (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Schmidt, Ulf, Secret Science: A Century of Poison Warfare and Human Experiments (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Schmidt, Ulf, and Frewer, A., eds, History and Theory of Human Experimentation: The Declaration of Helsinki and Modern Medical Ethics (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 2007).Google Scholar

Shmuely, Shira Dina, ‘The Bureaucracy of Empathy: Vivisection and the Question of Animal Pain in Britain, 1876–1912’, PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2017).Google Scholar

Stapleton, Darwin H., ed., Creating a Tradition of Biomedical Research: Contributions to the History of the Rockefeller University (New York: Rockefeller University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Stiles, Anne, Popular Fiction and Brain Science in the Late Nineteenth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Taithe, Bertrand, ‘“Cold Calculation in the Faces of Horrors?” Pity, Compassion and the Making of Humanitarian Protocols’, in Medicine, Emotion and Disease, 1700–1950, ed. Alberti, Fay Bound, 79–99 (Houndmills, UK: Palgrave, 2006).Google Scholar

Taithe, Bertrand, and Borton, John, ‘History, Memory and “Lessons Learnt” from Humanitarian Practitioners’, European Review of History: Revue européenne d’histoire, 23 (2016): 210–24.Google Scholar

Takahashi, Aya, ‘Hideyo Noguchi, the Pursuit of Immunity and the Persistence of Fame: A Reappraisal’, in Creating a Tradition of Biomedical Research: Contributions to the History of the Rockefeller University, ed. Stapleton, Darwin H., 227–39 (New York: Rockefeller University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Tansey, E. M., ‘“The Queen Has Been Dreadfully Shocked”: Aspects of Teaching Experimental Physiology Using Animals in Britain, 1876–1986’, Advances in Physiology Education, 19 (1998): 18–33.Google Scholar

Tansey, E. M., ‘The Wellcome Physiological Research Laboratories 1894–1904: The Home Office, Pharmaceutical Firms, and Animal Experiments’, Medical History, 33 (1989): 1–41.Google Scholar

Tröhler, Ulrich, and Maehle, Andreas-Holger, ‘Anti-Vivisection in Nineteenth-Century Germany and Switzerland: Motives and Methods’, in Vivisection in Historical Perspective, ed. Rupke, Nicolaas, 149–87 (London: Croom Helm, 1987).Google Scholar

Unti, Bernard, ‘“The Doctors Are So Sure That They Only Are Right”: The Rockefeller Institute and the Defeat of Vivisection Reform in New York, 1908–1914’, in Creating a Tradition of Biomedical Research: Contributions to the History of the Rockefeller University, ed. Stapleton, Darwin H., 175–90 (New York: Rockefeller University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Waller, J. C., ‘Gentlemanly Men of Science: Sir Francis Galton and the Professionalization of the British Life-Sciences’, Journal of the History of Biology, 34:1 (2001): 83–114.Google Scholar

Warner, John Harley, ‘Ernst, Harold Clarence’, in American National Biography(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Weisz, George, Divide and Conquer: A Comparative History of Medical Specialization (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Westacott, E., A Century of Vivisection and Anti-Vivisection: A Study of Their Effect upon Science, Medicine and Human Life during the Past Hundred Years (Ashingdon, UK: C. W. Daniel, 1949).Google Scholar

Westermann-Cicio, Mary L., ‘Of Mice and Medical Men: The Medical Profession’s Response to the Vivisection Controversy in Turn of the Century America’, PhD thesis, State University of New York (2001).Google Scholar

Wetherby, Aelwen D., Private Aid, Political Activism: American Medical Relief to Spain and China, 1936–1949 (Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 2017).Google Scholar

White, Paul S., ‘Darwin Wept: Science and the Sentimental Subject’, Journal of Victorian Culture, 16 (2011): 195–213.Google Scholar

White, Paul S., ‘The Experimental Animal in Victorian Britain’, in Thinking with Animals: New Perspectives on Anthropomorphism, ed. Daston, Lorraine and Mitman, Gregg, 59–81 (New York: Columbia University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

White, Paul S., ‘Sympathy under the Knife: Experimentation and Emotion in Late Victorian Medicine’, in Medicine, Emotion and Disease, 1700–1950, ed. Alberti, Fay Bound, 100–24 (Houndmills, UK: Palgrave, 2006).Google Scholar

Willis, Martin, ‘Unmasking Immorality: Popular Opposition to Laboratory Science in Late Victorian Britain’, in Repositioning Victorian Sciences: Shifting Centres in Nineteenth-Century Scientific Thinking, ed. Clifford, David, 207–18 (London: Anthem Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Wilson, David A. H., ‘The Public Relations of Experimental Animal Psychology in Britain in the 1970s’, Contemporary British History, 18 (2004): 27–46.Google Scholar

Woodfield, Malcolm, ‘Victorian Weekly Reviews and Reviewing after 1860: R.H. Hutton and the Spectator’, Yearbook of English Studies, 16 (1986): 74–91.Google Scholar

Woolsey, Thomas A., and Burke, Robert E., ‘The Playwright, the Practitioner, the Politician, the President, and the Pathologist: A Guide to the 1900 Senate Document Titled “Vivisection”’, Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 30 (1987): 235–58.Google Scholar

Worboys, Michael, ‘Klein, Edward Emanuel (1844–1925)’, in Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar