Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-24T06:09:14.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Bacterial Abundance, Growth, and Metabolism in the Tidal Freshwater Hudson River

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2010

Stuart E. G. Findlay
Affiliation:
Institute of Ecosystem Studies
Jeffrey S. Levinton
Affiliation:
State University of New York, Stony Brook
Get access

Summary

abstract Free-living, planktonic heterotrophic bacteria comprise a major portion of the living biomass of organisms in the Hudson River. Mean densities of bacteria are 5 × 109 cells/L and abundances generally decrease in a downstream pattern. Bacterial growth is rapid with cells doubling about once per day during the warmer months. Demand for carbon is high and consequently the contribution of bacteria to ecosystem respiration is large, particularly in the mid-Hudson where phytoplankton respiration is low. The high demand for carbon and lack of strong correlation with phytoplankton abundance suggests bacteria are largely reliant on allochthonous carbon delivered from the watershed. Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) dominates the load from the watershed and bacteria have demonstrated roughly equal ability to grow on DOC derived from several different sources and tributaries. Bacterial abundance increased following the zebra mussel invasion in the early 1990s probably due to zebra mussel removal of important grazers on bacteria.

Introduction

In the past twenty years, heterotrophic microorganisms have become widely recognized as integral parts of aquatic ecosystems that play important roles in food webs, nutrient transformations, and organic carbon budgets. Planktonic bacteria can serve as effective links in food webs from dissolved organic matter to larger organisms, although the degree of efficiency varies greatly among aquatic systems (del Giorgio and Cole, 2000). Microbes growing on particulate and dissolved carbon can also act as significant sinks for inorganic nutrients derived from the water column (Caraco et al., 1998).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brett, M. T., Lubnow, F. S., Villar-Argaiz, M., Müller-Solger, A., and Goldman, C. R. 1999. Nutrient control of bacterioplankton and phytoplankton dynamics. Aquatic Ecology 33:135–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caraco, N. F., Lampman, G., Cole, J. J., Limburg, K. E., Pace, M. L., and Fischer, D. 1998. Microbial assimilation of DIN in a nitrogen rich estuary: implications for food quality and isotope studies. Marine Ecology Progress Series 167:59–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, J. J., and Caraco, N. F. 2001. Carbon in catchments: connecting terrestrial carbon losses with aquatic metabolism. Marine & Freshwater Research 52:101–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, J. J., Findlay, S., and Pace, M. L. 1988. Bacterial production in fresh and saltwater ecosystems: a cross-system overview. Marine Ecology Progress Series 43:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crump, B. C., and Baross, J. A. 1996. Particle-attached bacteria and heterotrophic plankton associated with Columbia River estuarine turbidity maxima. Marine Ecology Progress Series 138:265–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunha, M. A., Almeida, M. A., and Alcântara, F. 2001. Short-term responses of the natural planktonic bacterial community to the changing water properties in an estuarine environment: ectoenzymatic activity, glucose incorporation, and biomass production. Microbial Ecology 42:69–79Google Scholar
del Giorgio, P. A., and Cole, J. J. 2000. Bacterial growth efficiency and energetics, in Kirchman, D. L. (ed.), Microbial Ecology of the Oceans. New York: Wiley-Liss, pp. 289–325Google Scholar
Ducklow, H. W., and Shiah, F.-K. 1993. Bacterial productions in estuaries, in Ford, T. E. (ed.), Aquatic Microbiology: An Ecological Approach. Boston, MA: Blackwell Scientific Publications, pp. 261–87Google Scholar
Findlay, S., Pace, M. L., Lints, D., Cole, J. J., Caraco, N. F., and Peierls, B. 1991. Weak coupling of bacterial and algal production in a heterotrophic ecosystem, the Hudson Estuary. Limnology and Oceanography 36:268–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Findlay, S., Pace, M. L., and Lints, D., and Howe, K. 1992. Bacterial metabolism of organic carbon in the tidal freshwater Hudson estuary. Marine Ecology Progress Series 89:147–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Findlay, S., Pace, M. L., and Fischer, D. 1996. Spatial and temporal variability in the lower food web of the tidal freshwater Hudson River. Estuaries 19:866–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Findlay, S., Pace, M. L., and Fischer, D. T. 1998a. Effect of the invasive zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) on the microbial food web in the tidal freshwater Hudson River. Microbial Ecology 36:131–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Findlay, S., Sinsabaugh, R. L., Fischer, D. T., and Franchini, P. 1998b. Sources of dissolved organic carbon supporting planktonic bacterial production in the tidal freshwater Hudson River. Ecosystems 1:227–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollibaugh, J. T., and Wong, P. S. 1999. Microbial processes in the San Francisco Bay estuarine turbidity maximum. Estuaries 22:848–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howarth, R. W., Schneider, R., and Swaney, D. 1996. Metabolism and organic carbon fluxes in the tidal freshwater Hudson River. Estuaries 19:848–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lampman, G., Caraco, N. F., and Cole, J. J. 1999. Spatial and temporal patterns of nutrient concentration and export in the tidal Hudson River. Estuaries 22:285–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leff, L. G. 2000. Longitudinal changes in microbial assemblages of the Ogeechee River. Freshwater Biology 43:605–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Connell, M., Baldwin, D. S., Robertson, A. J., and Rees, G. 2000. Release and bioavailability of dissolved organic matter from floodplain litter: influence of origin and oxygen levels. Freshwater Biology 45:333–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinhassi, J., Azam, F., Hemphälä, J., Long, R. A., Martinez, J., Zweifel, U. L., and Hagström, Å. 1999. Coupling between bacterioplankton species composition, population dynamics, and organic matter degradation. Aquatic Microbial Ecology 17: 13–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pomeroy, L. R. 1974. The ocean's food web, a changing paradigm. Bioscience 24:499–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raymond, P. A., and Bauer, J. E. 2001a. DOC cycling in a temperate estuary: a mass balance approach using natural 14C and 13C isotopes. Limnology and Oceanography 46:655–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raymond, P. A., and Bauer, J. E. 2001b. Riverine export of aged terrestrial organic matter to the North Atlantic Ocean. Nature 409:497–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raymond, P. A., Caraco, N. F., and Cole, J. J. 1997. CO2 concentration and atmospheric flux in the Hudson River. Estuaries 20:381–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roland, F., and Cole, J. J. 1999. Regulation of bacterial growth efficiency in a large turbid estuary. Aquatic Microbial Ecology 20:31–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sañudo-Wilhelmy, S. A., and Taylor, G. T. 1999. Bacterioplankton dynamics and organic carbon partitioning in the lower Hudson River estuary. Marine Ecology Progress Series 182:17–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strayer, D. L., Caraco, N. F., Cole, J. J., Findlay, S., and Pace, M. L. 1999. Transformation of freshwater ecosystems by bivalves: a case study of zebra mussels in the Hudson River. BioScience 49:19–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaqué, D., Pace, M. L., Findlay, S., and Lints, D. 1992. Fate of bacterial production in a heterotrophic ecosystem: grazing by protozoans and metazoans in the Hudson Estuary. Marine Ecology Progress Series 89:155–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×