Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T08:40:53.464Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2012

Richard R. Lau
Affiliation:
Rutgers University, New Jersey
David P. Redlawsk
Affiliation:
University of Iowa
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
How Voters Decide
Information Processing in Election Campaigns
, pp. 313 - 334
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abelson, Robert P., and Levi, Ariel. 1985. “Decision Making and Decision Theory.” In Gardner Lindzey and Elliot Aronson (eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology (Volume I, 3rd edition, pp. 231–309). New York: Random HouseGoogle Scholar
Abramowitz, Alan I. 1989. “Viability, Electability, and Candidate Choice in a Presidential Primary Election: A Test of Competing Models.” Journal of Politics 51(November): 977–992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abramson, Paul R., Aldrich, John H., Paolino, Phil, and Rhode, David W.. 1992. “‘Sophisticated’ Voting in the 1988 Presidential Primaries.” American Political Science Review 86(March): 55–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Achen, Christopher H. 1975. “Mass Political Attitudes and the Survey Response.”American Political Science Review 69 (December): 1218–1231CrossRef
Alba, Joseph W., and Marmorstein, Howard. 1987. “The Effects of Frequency Knowledge on Consumer Decision Making.” Journal of Consumer Research 14(June): 14–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, John H. 1980. Before the Convention: Strategies and Choices in Presidential Nomination Campaigns.Chicago:University of Chicago PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, John H. 1993. “Rational Choice and Turnout.” American Journal of Political Science 37(February): 246–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, John H., and Alvarez, R. Michael. 1994. “Issues and the presidential primary voter.”Political Behavior 16(September): 289–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Herbert E. 1975. Financing the 1972 Election. Lexington, MA: Lexington BooksGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Herbert E. 1979. Financing the 1976 Election. Washington, DC: Congressional QuarterlyGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Herbert E. 1983. Financing the 1980 Election. Lexington, MA: Lexington BooksGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Herbert E., and Bauer, Monica. 1991. Financing the 1988 Election. Boulder, CO: Westview PressGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Herbert E., and Corrado, Anthony. 1995. Financing the 1992 Election. Armonk, NY: M. E. SharpeGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Herbert E., and Haggerty, Brian A.. 1987. Financing the 1984 Election. Lexington, MA: Lexington BooksGoogle Scholar
Allison, Graham T. 1971. Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. Boston:Little, BrownGoogle Scholar
Allison, Graham T., and Zelikow, Philip D.. 1999. Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis (2nd edition). New York:LongmanGoogle Scholar
Anderson, John R. 1983. The Architecture of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Anderson, John R.. 1973. Human Associative Memory. New York:WileyGoogle Scholar
Anderson, John R., Byrne, Michael D., Douglass, Scott, Lebiere, Christian, and Qin, Yulin. 2004. “An Integrated Theory of the Mind.” Psychological Review 111(4): 1036–1060CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, Norman H. 1965. “Primacy Effects in Personality Impression Formation Using a Generalized Order Effect Paradigm.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2: 1–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, Norman H. 1981 . Foundations of Information Integration Theory. New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Iyengar, Shanto. 1995. Going Negative: How Political Advertisements Shrink and Polarize the Electorate. New York:Free PressGoogle Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth J. 1951. Social Choice and Individual Values. New York: John Wiley and SonsGoogle Scholar
Aschenbrenner, K. M., Bockenholt, U., Albert, D., and Schmalhofer, F.. 1986. “The Selection of Dimensions When Choosing Between Multiattribute Alternatives.” In R. W. Scholz (ed.), Current Issues in West German Decision Research (pp. 63–78). Frankfurt: LangGoogle Scholar
Bargh, John A. 1989. “Preconscious and Postconscious Automaticity in Social Perception.” In J. S. Uleman and J. A. Bargh (eds.), Unintended Thought (pp. 3–51). New York: Guilford PressGoogle Scholar
Bargh, John A., and Thein, R. R.. 1985. “Individual Construct Accessibility, Person Memory, and the Recall-judgment Link: the Case of Information Overload.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49: 1129–1146CrossRef
Bartels, Larry M. 1988. Presidential Primaries and the Dynamics of Public Choice.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 1996. “Uninformed Votes: Information Effects in Presidential Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 40(February): 194–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassili, John N. 1995. “Response Latency and the Accessibility of Voting Intentions: What Contributes to Accessibility and How It Affects Vote Choice.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 21(July): 686–695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belmore, S. M. 1987. “Determinants of Attention during Impression Formation.” Journal of Experiment Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 13: 480–489Google Scholar
Ben Zur, Hasida, and Breznitz, Shlomo J.. 1981. “The Effects of Time Pressure on Risky Choice Behavior.” Acta Psycologica 47(February): 89–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, W. Lance. 1988. News: The Politics of Illusion (2nd ed.). New York:LongmanGoogle Scholar
Bennett, W. Lance. 1992. The Governing Crisis: Media, Money, and Marketing in American Elections.New York:St. Martin's PressGoogle Scholar
Berleson, Bernard R., Lazarsfeld, Paul F., and McPhee, William. 1954. Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago:University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Berns, Walter. 1962. “Voting Studies.” In Herbert Storing, Essays on the Scientific Study of Politics (pp. 1–62). New York: Holt, Rinehart and WinstonGoogle Scholar
Bettman, James R., Johnson, Eric J., Luce, M. F., and Payne, John W.. 1993. “Correlation, Conflict, and Choice.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition 19(July): 931–951Google Scholar
Bhaskar, Roy. 1997. A Realist Theory of Science. New York: VersoGoogle Scholar
Biggs, Stanley F., Bedard, Jean C., Gaber, Brian G., and Linsmeier, Thomas J.. 1985. “The Effects of Task Size and Similarity on the Decision Behavior of Bank Loan Officers.” Management Science 31(August): 970–987CrossRef
Billings, Robert S., and Marcus, Stephen A.. 1983. “Measures of Compensatory and Noncompensatory Models of Decision Behavior: Process Tracing versus Policy Capturing.” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 31(June): 331–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billings, Robert S., and Scherer, Lisa L.. 1988. “The Effects of Response Mode and Importance on Decision-making Strategies: Judgment vs. Choice.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 41(1): 1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bockenholt, Ulf, Albert, Dietrich, Aschenbrenner, Michael, and Schmalhofer, Franz. 1991. “The Effects of Attractiveness, Dominance and Attribute Differences on Information Acquisition in Multiattribute Binary Choice.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 49(August): 258–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, Henry E. 1985. “The Perils of Survey Research: Inter-Personally Incomparable Responses.” Political Methodology 11(3): 269–291Google Scholar
Brady, Henry E., and Sniderman, Paul M.. 1985. “Attitude Attribution: A Group Basis for Political Reasoning.” American Political Science Review 79(December): 1061–1078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunswik, E. 1957. “Scope and Aspects of the Cognitive Problem.” In H. Gruber, K. R. Hammond, and R. Jessor (eds.), Contemporary Approaches to Cognition (pp. 5–31). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, Bruce. 1987. The Citizen's Presidency: Standards of Choice and Judgment. Washington, DC:Congressional Quarterly PressGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, Bruce. 1988. “Sizing up Candidates in Private Lives and Public Careers.” PS: Political Science and Politics 21(Spring): 250–256Google Scholar
Burnham, Walter Dean. 1965. “The Changing Shape of the American Political Universe.”American Political Science Review 59(March): 7–28CrossRef
Burnham, Walter Dean. 1974. “Theory and Voting Research: Some Reflections on Converse's ‘Change in the American Electorate.’American Political Science Review 68(December): 1002–1023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bystrom, Dianne G., Mary, Christine Banwart, Lynda, Lee Kaid, and Terry, A. Robertson. 2004. Gender and Candidate Communication: Videostyle, Webstyle, Newsstyle. New York:RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Gurin, Gerald, and Miller, Warren E.. 1954. The Voter Decides. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson & CompanyGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1960. The American Voter. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Donald T., and Stanley, Julian C.. 1963. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Chicago:Rand McNallyGoogle Scholar
Cantor, Nancy, and Mischel, Walter. 1979. “Prototypes in Person Perception.” In Leonard Berkowitz (ed.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Volume 12, pp. 3–25). New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Carlston, Donal E. 1980. “The Recall and Use of Traits and Events in Social Inference Processes.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 16(3): 303–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmines, Edward G., and Kuklinski, James H.. 1990. “Incentives, Opportunities, and the Logic of Public Opinion in American Political Representation.” In John A. Ferejohn and James H. Kuklinski (eds.), Information and Democratic Processes (pp. 240–268). Urbana: University of Illinois PressGoogle Scholar
Carmines, Edward G., and Stimson, James A.. 1980. “The Two Faces of Issue Voting.” American Political Science Review 74, 78–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, John S., and Johnson, Eric J.. 1990. Decision Research: A Field Guide. Beverly Hills, CA:SageGoogle Scholar
Chase, William G., and Simon, Herbert A.. 1973. “Perception in Chess.” Cognitive Psychology 4(January): 55–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connolly, William E. 1972. “On ‘Interests’ in Politics.” Politics and Society 2(Summer): 459–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conover, Pamela J., and Feldman, Stanley. 1984. “How People Organize Their Political World: A Schematic Model.” American Journal of Political Science 28(February): 95–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conover, Pamela J., and Feldman, Stanley. 1986. “The Role of Inference in the Perception of Political Candidates.” In Richard R. Lau and David O. Sears (eds.), Political Cognition: The 19th Annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition (pp. 127–158). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
Conover, Pamela J., and Feldman, Stanley. 1989. “Candidate Perception in an Ambiguous World: Campaigns, Cues, and Inference Processes.” American Journal of Political Science 33 (November): 912–940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conover, Pamela Johnston, Virginia, Gray, and Steven, Coombs. 1982. “Single-Issue Voting: Elite-Mass Linkages.” Political Behavior 4 (December): 309–331Google Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1964. “Attitudes and Non-Attitudes: Continuation of a Dialogue.” In Edward Tufte (ed.), The Quantitative Analysis of Social Problems. (pp. 206–261). Reading, MA:Addison-WesleyGoogle Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1975. “Public Opinion and Voting Behavior.” In Fred Greenstein and Nelson Polsby (eds.), Handbook of Political Science (Volume 4, pp. 75–170). Reading, MA: Addison-WesleyGoogle Scholar
Converse, Philip E., and Gregory B. Markus. 1979. “Plus ca Change: The New CPS Election Study.”American Political Science Review 73(March): 32–49CrossRef
Corrado, Anthony. 1997. “Financing the 1996 Elections.” In Gerald M. Pomper (ed.), The Election of 1996 (pp. 135–172). Chatham, NJ: Chatham House PublishersGoogle Scholar
Corrado, Anthony. 2001. “Financing the 2000 Elections.” In Gerald M. Pomper (ed.), The Election of 2000 (pp. 92–124). Chatham, NJ: Chatham House PublishersGoogle Scholar
Corrado, Anthony, and Firestone, Charles M. (eds.). 1996. Elections in Cyberspace: Toward a New Era in American Politics. Washington, DC:Aspen InstituteGoogle Scholar
Crawford, Mary E. 1995. Talking Difference: On Gender ad Language. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage Publications
Czerlinski, Jean, Gerd, Gigerenzer, and Goldstein, Daniel G.. 1999. “How Good Are Simple Heuristics?” In Gerd Gigerenzer, Peter M. Todd, and the ABC Research Group (eds.), Simple Heuristics that Make Us Smart (pp. 97–118). New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1961. Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City.New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1989. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
Davis, Otto A., Hinich, Melvin J., and Ordeshook, Peter C.. 1970. “An Expository Development of a Mathematical Model of the Electoral Process.” American Political Science Review 64(June): 426–448Google Scholar
Dawes, Robyn M. 1979. “The Robust Beauty of Improper Linear Models in Decision Making.” American Psychologist 34(July): 571–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawes, Robyn M. 1988. Rational Choice in an Uncertain World.New York: Harcourt Brace JovanovichGoogle Scholar
Dawes, Robyn M. 1998. “Behavioral Decision Making and Judgment.” In Daniel T. Gilbert, Susan T. Fiske, and Gardner Lindzey (eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology (Volume I, 4th edition, pp. 497–548). Boston: McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
DeClercq, Eugene, Hurley, Thomas L., and Luttberg, Norman. 1976. “Voting in American Presidential Elections: 1956–1972.” In Samuel A. Kirkpatrick (ed.), American Electoral Behavior: Change and Stability. Beverly Hills, CA:SageGoogle Scholar
Delli Carpini, Michael, and Keeter, Scott. 1996. What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and RowGoogle Scholar
Druckman, James N., and Lupia, Arthus. 2000. “Preference Formation.”Annual Review of Political Science 3: 1–24CrossRef
Easton, David. 1953. The Political System: An Inquiry into the State of Political Science. New York:KnopfGoogle Scholar
Easton, David. 1965. A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York: WileyGoogle Scholar
Einhorn, Hillel J. 1970. “The Use of Nonlinear, Noncompensatory Models in Decision Making.” Psychological Bulletin 73: 211–230CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Einhorn, Hillel J., and Hogarth, Robin M.. 1975. “Unit Weighting Schemes for Decision Making.” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 13(April): 171–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Einhorn, Hillel J., and Hogarth, Robin M.. 1981. “Behavioral Decision Theory: Processes of Judgment and Choice.” Annual Review of Psychology 32: 53–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enelow, James M., and Hinich, Melvin J.. 1984. The Spatial Theory of Voting: An Introduction. New York:Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Ericsson, K. Anders, and Simon, Herbert A.. 1980. Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data. Cambridge, MA:MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Ferejohn, John A., and Fiorina, Morris P.. 1974. “The Paradox of Not Voting: A Decision Theoretic Analysis.” American Political Science Review 68(June): 525–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Festinger, Leon. 1957. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University PressGoogle Scholar
Finnigan, Simon, Humphreys, Michael S.., Dennis, Simon, and Geffen, Gina. 2002. “ERP ‘Old/New’ Effects: Memory Strength and Decisional Factors.” Neuropsychologia 40: 2288–2304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 1976. “The Voting Decision: Instrumental and Expressive Aspects.” Journal of Politics 38(May): 390–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Gregory W., and Hawkins, Scott A.. 1993. “Strategy Compatibility, Scale Compatibility, and the Prominence Effect.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 19(June): 580–597Google Scholar
Fischer, Gregory W., and Johnson, Eric J.. 1986. “Behavioral Decision Theory.” In Richard R. Lau and David O. Sears (eds.), Political Cognition (pp. 55–65). Hillsdale, NJ: ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
Fischoff, Baruch, Slovic, Paul, and Lichtenstein, Sarah. 1978. “Fault Trees: Sensitivity of Estimated Failure Probabilities to Problem Representation.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 4(May): 330–344Google Scholar
Fishman, Mark. 1980. Manufacturing the News. Austin: University of Texas PressGoogle Scholar
Fiske, Susan T., Kinder, Donald R., and Larter, W. Michael. 1983. “The Novice and the Expert: Knowledge-Based Strategies in Political Cognition.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 19(July): 381–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiske, Susan T., Lau, Richard R., and Smith, Richard A.. 1990. “On the Variety and Utility of Political Knowledge Structures.” Social Cognition 8(Spring): 31–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiske, Susan T., and Pavelchak, Mark A.. 1986. “Category-Based versus Piecemeal-Based Affective Responses: Developments in Schema-Triggered Affect.” In Richard M. Sorrentino and E. Tory Higgins (eds.), The Handbook of Motivation and Cognition: Foundations of Social Behavior (pp. 167–203). New York:GuilfordGoogle Scholar
Fiske, Susan T., and Taylor, Shelley E.. 1991. Social Cognition (2nd edition). New York: McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
Flanigan, William H., and Zingale, Nancy H. 1983. Political Behavior of the American Electorate (5th edition). Boston: Allyn and BaconGoogle Scholar
Ford, Gary T., and Smith, Ruth Ann. 1987. “Inferential Beliefs in Consumer Evaluations: An Assessment of Alternative Processing Strategies.” Journal of Consumer Research 14(December): 363–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, Kevin J., Schmitt, Neal, Schechtman, Susan L., Hults, Brian M., and Doherty, Mary L.. 1989. “Process Tracing Methods: Contributions, Problems, and Neglected Research Questions.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 43(February): 75–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, Thomas. 2004. What's the Matter with Kansas? How Conservatives Won the Heart of America. New York: Metropolitan BooksGoogle Scholar
Frankenberger, Kristina D., and Albaum, Gerald S.. 1997. “Using Behavioral Decision Theory to Assess Advertisement Recognition Tasks by Level of Difficulty.” Psychology & Marketing 14(March): 145–1623.0.CO;2-D>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, Mark N. 1996. “Electoral Participation.” In Lawrence LeDuc, Richard G. Niemi, and Pippa Norris (eds.), Comparing Democracies: Elections and Voting in Global Perspective (pp. 216–235). Thousand Oaks, CA: SageGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Jeffrey (ed.). 1995. The Rational Choice Controversy. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Milton. (ed.). 1953. Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Gabrielcik, Adele, and Fazio, Russel H.. 1984. “Priming and Frequency Estimation: A Strict Test of the Availability Heuristic.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 10(March): 85–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gans, Herbert. 1979. Deciding What's News. New York: Vintage BooksGoogle Scholar
Gant, Michael M., and Davis, Dwight F.. 1984. “Mental Economy and Voter Rationality: The Informed Citizen Problem in Voting Research.” Journal of Politics 46(February): 132–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, Alan, and Green, Donald. 1999. “Misperceptions about Perceptual Bias.”Annual Review of Political Science 2: 189–210CrossRef
Gettys, Charles F., Pliske, Rebecca M., Manning, Carol, and Casey, Jeff T.. 1987. “An Evaluation of Human Act Generation Performance.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 39(February): 23–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geva, Nehemia, and Mintz, Alex (eds.). 1997. Decisionmaking on War and Peace: The Cognitive-Rational Debate. Boulder, CO:Lynne RiennerGoogle Scholar
Gigerenzer, Gerd, and Goldstein, Daniel G.. 1999. “Betting on One Good Reason: The Take the Best Heuristic.” In Gerd Gigerenzer, Peter M. Todd, and the ABC Research Group (eds.), Simple Heuristics that Make Us Smart (pp. 75–95). New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Gigerenzer, Gerd, and Todd, Peter M.. 1999. “Fast and Frugal Heuristics: The Adaptive Toolbox.” In Gerd Gigerenzer, Peter M. Todd, and the ABC Research Group (eds.), Simple Heuristics that Make Us Smart (pp. 3–34). New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, Daniel T. 1998. “Ordinary Personology.” In Daniel Gilbert, Susan T. Fiske, and Gardner Lindzey (eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology (Volume 2, 4th edition, pp. 89–150). Boston: McGraw HillGoogle Scholar
Gilliland, Stephen W., and Schmitt, Neal. 1993. “Information Redundancy and Decision Behavior: a Process Tracing Investigation.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 54(2): 157–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Daniel G., and Gigerenzer, Gerd. 1999. “The Recognition Heuristic: How Ignorance Makes Us Smart.” In Gerd Gigerenzer, Peter M. Todd, and the ABC Research Group (eds.), Simple Heuristics that Make Us Smart (pp. 37–58). New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Graber, Doris A. 1984. Processing the News: How People Tame the Information Tide. New York:LongmanGoogle Scholar
Green, Donald P., and Shapiro, Ian. 1994. Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory: A Critique of Applications in Political Science.New Haven, CT:Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
Guterbock, Thomas M. 1980. “Social Class and Voting Choices in Middletown.” Social Forces 58(June): 1044–1056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamill, Ruth,. 1986. “Cognitive consequences of political sophistication.” In Richard R. Lau and David O. Sears (eds.), Political Cognition: The 19th Annual Carnegie Symposium on Congnition (pp. 69–93) Hillsdale, NJ: ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
Hamill, Ruth, Lodge, Milton, and Blake, Fredrick. 1985. “The Breadth, Depth, and Utility of Class, Partisan, and Ideological Schemata.” American Journal of Political Science 29(August): 850–870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hastie, Reid. 1986. “A Primer of Information Processing Theory for the Political Scientist.” In Richard R. Lau and David O. Sears (eds.), Political Cognition: The 19th Annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition (pp. 11–39). Hillsdale, NJ: ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
Hastie, Reid. 2001. “Problems for Judgment and Decision Making.” Annual Rev-iew of Psychology (Volume 52, pp. 653–683). Stanford, CA: Annual ReviewsCrossRef
Hastie, Reid, and Robyn, M. Dawes. 2001. Rational Choice in an Uncertain World. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Hastie, Reid, and Kumar, Purohit A.. 1979. “Person Memory: Personality Traits as Organizing Principles in Memory for Behavior.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37(January): 25–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hastie, Reid, Ostrom, Thomas M., Ebbesen, Ebbe B., Wyer, Jr., Robert S., Hamilton, David L., and Carlston, Donal E. (eds.). 1980. Person Memory: The Cognitive Basis of Social Perception. Hillsdale, NJ:ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
Hastie, Reid, and Park, Bernadette. 1986. “The Relationship Between Memory and Judgment Depends on Whether the Task Is Memory-based or On-line.”Psychological Review 93(2): 258–268CrossRef
Hastie, Reid, and Pennington, Nancy. 1988. “Notes on the Distinction Between Memory-based and On-line Judgments.” In John N. Bassili (ed.), On-line Cognition in Person Perception (pp. 1–19). Hillsdale, NJ: ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
Heider, Fritz. 1958. The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: WileyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hempel, Carl G. 1965. Aspects of Scientific Explanations. New York: Free PressGoogle Scholar
Henshel, Richard L. 1980. “The Purposes of Laboratory Experimentation and the Virtues of Deliberate Artificiality.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 16(September): 466–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herek, Gregory M., Janis, Irving L., and Huth, Paul. 1987. “Decision Making During International Crises.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 31(June): 203–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herstein, John A. 1981. “Keeping the Voter's Limits in Mind: A Cognitive Process Analysis of Decision Making in Voting.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 40(May): 843–861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, E. Tory, and King, G.. 1981. “Accessibility of Social Constructs: Information Processing Consequences of Individual and Contextual Variability.” In Nancy Cantor and John F. Kihlstrom (eds.), Personality, Cognition, and Social Interaction (pp. 69–122). Hillsdale, NJ: ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
Hinich, Melvin J., and Munger, Michael C.. 1994. Ideology and the Theory of Political Choice. Ann Arbor:University of Michigan PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinich, Melvin J., and Munger, Michael C.. 1997. Analytical Politics. New York:Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogarth, Robin M. 1975. “Cognitive Processes and the Assessment of Subjective Probability Distributions.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 70(June): 271–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogarth, Robin M. 1987. Judgment and Choice (2nd edition). New York: Wiley
Holbrook, Thomas M. 1996. “Reading the Political Tea Leaves: A Forecasting Model of Contemporary Presidential Elections.” American Politics Quarterly 24(October): 506–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Li-Ning. 2000. “Examining Candidate Information Search Processes: The Impact of Processing Goals and Sophistication.” Journal of Communication 50(Winter): 93–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Li-Ning, and Vincent Price. 2001. “Motivations, Goals, Information Search, and Memory about Political Candidates.”Political Psychology 22: 665–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1968. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C. 1987. The Politics of Congressional Elections (2nd edition). Boston: Little, BrownGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C., and Kernell, Samuel. 1981. Strategy and Choice in Congressional Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
Jacoby, Jacob, Kohn, Carol, and Speller, Donald E.. 1974. “Brand Choice Behavior as a Function of Information Load.” Journal of Marketing Research 11(February): 63–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacoby, J., Speller, Donald E., and Berning, C. Kohn. 1974. “Brand Choice Behavior as a Function of Information Load: Replication and Extension.” Journal of Consumer Research 1(February): 33–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacoby, Jacob, Chestnut, R. W., Weigl, K. C., and Fischer, W.. 1976. “Pre-Purchasing Information Acquisition: Description of a Process Methodology, Research Paradigm, and Pilot Investigation.” Advances in Consumer Research 5(6): 546–554Google Scholar
Jacoby, Jacob, Jaccard, James, Kuss, Alfred, Troutman, Tracy, and Mazursky, David. 1987. “New Directions in Behavioral Process Research: Implications for Social Psychology.”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 23(March): 146–175CrossRef
Janis, Irvine L. 1972. Victims of Groupthink.Boston: Houghton MifflinGoogle Scholar
Janis, Irvine L., and Mann, Leon. 1977. Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment. New York: The Free PressGoogle Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 1976. Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Eric J., and Russo, J. E.. 1984. “Product Familiarity and Learning New Information.” Journal of Consumer Research 11(August): 542–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Michael D. 1984. “Consumer Choice Strategies for Comparing Noncomparable Alternatives.” Journal of Consumer Research 11(December): 741–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Michael D. 1986. “Modeling Choice Strategies for Noncomparable Alternatives.” Marketing Sciences 5(Winter): 37–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Mitzi M. S. 1993. “Thinking about Strategies During, Before, and After Making a Decision.” Psychology and Aging 8(3): 231–241CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, Bryan D. 1994. Reconceiving Decision-Making in Democratic Politics: Attention, Choice, and Public Policy. Chicago:University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Jones, Bryan D. 1999. “Bounded Rationality.” Annual Review of Political Science 2: 297–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Just, Marion R., Crigler, Ann N., Alger, Dean E., Cook, Timothy E., Kern, Montaque, and West, Darrell M.. 1996. Crosstalk: Citizens, Candidates, and the Media in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago:University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel. 1994. “New Challenges to the Rationality Assumption.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 15(1): 18–36
Kahneman, Daniel, and Tversky, Amos. 1972. “Subjective Probability: A Judgment of Representativeness.” Cognitive Psychology 3(July): 430–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, and Tversky, Amos. 1973. “On the Psychology of Prediction.” Psychological Review 80(March): 237–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, and Tversky, Amos. 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk.” Econometrica 47(May): 263–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, and Tversky, Amos. 1982. “The Psychology of Preferences.” Scientific American 246(February): 160–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, and Tversky, Amos. 1984. “Choices, Values, and Frames.” American Psychologist 39(April): 341–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, Slovic, Paul, and Tversky, Amos. 1982. Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. New York:Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, Kevin L., and Staelin, Richard. 1987. “Effects of Quality and Quantity of Information on Decision Effectiveness.” Journal of Consumer Research 14(September): 200–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, L. R., and Ho, J. L.. 1988. “Decision Problem Structuring: Generating Options.” IEEE Transactions on System, Man, and Cybernetics 18: 715–728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, Stanley Jr. 1983. Interpreting Elections. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, Stanley Jr., and Mirer, Thad W.. 1974. “The Simple Act of Voting.” American Political Science Review 68(June): 572–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerstholt, Jose H. 1992. “Information Search and Choice Accuracy as a Function of Task Complexity and Task Structure.” Acta Psychologica 80: 185–197Google Scholar
Kessel, John H. 1972. “Comment: The Issues in Issue Voting.” American Political Science Review 66(June): 459–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Key, V. O., Jr. 1966. The Responsible Electorate. Cambridge, MA: Belknap PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinder, Donald R. 1998. “Communication and Opinion.” Annual Review of Political Science (Volume 1, pp. 167–197). Stanford, CA: Annual ReviewsCrossRef
Kinder, Donald R., Adams, G. S., and Gronke, Paul W.. 1989. “Economics and Politics in the 1984 American Presidential Election.” American Journal of Political Science 33(May): 491–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinder, Donald R., and Kiewiet, D. Roderick. 1979. “Economic Discontent and Political Behavior: The Role of Personal Grievances and Collective Economic Judgments in Congressional Voting.” American Journal of Political Science 23(May): 495–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinder, Donald R., and Palfrey, Thomas (eds.). 1993. Experimental Foundations of Political Science. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinder, Donald R., and Sanders, Lynn. 1990. “Mimicking Political Debate with Survey Questions: The Case of White Opinion on Affirmative Action for Blacks.” Social Cognition 8(1): 73–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkpatrick, Samuel A. (ed.). 1976. American Electoral Behavior: Change and Stability. Beverly Hills, CA:SageGoogle Scholar
Kirkpatrick, Samuel A., Lyons, William, and Fitzgerald, Michael R.. 1976. “Candidates, Parties, and Issues in the American Electorate: Two Decades of Change.” In Samuel A. Kirkpatrick (ed.), American Electoral Behavior: Change and Stability. Beverly Hills, CA:SageGoogle Scholar
Klayman, J. 1985. “Children's Decision Strategies and Their Adaptation to Task Characteristics.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 35(April): 179–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleinmuntz, Don N., and Schkade, David A. 1993. “Information Displays and Decision Processes.” Psychological Science 4(July): 221–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krosnick, Jon. A. 1990. “Government Policy and Citizen Passion: A Study of Issue Publics in Contemporary America.” Political Behavior 12(March): 59–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuklinski, James H., and Hurley, Norman L.. 1994. “On Hearing and Interpreting Political Messages: A Cautionary Tale of Citizen Cue Taking.”Journal of Politics 56(August): 729–751CrossRef
Kuklinski, James H., and Quirk, Paul J.. 2001. “Conceptual Foundations of Citizen Competence.” Political Behavior 23(September): 285–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuklinski, James H., Luskin, Robert C., and Bolland, James. 1991. “Where is the Schema? Going Beyond the ‘S’ Word in Political Psychology.” American Political Science Review 85(December): 1341–1356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunda, Z. 1987. “Motivated Inference: Self-Serving Generation and Evaluation of Causal Theories.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53(4): 636–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunda, Z. 1990. “The Case for Motivated Reasoning.” Psychological Bulletin 1083: 480–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakatos, Imre. 1970. “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes.” In Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (pp. 91–196). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, Robert E. 1962. Political Ideology: Why the American Common Man Believes as He Does. New York:The Free PressGoogle Scholar
Langley, P., Simon, Herbert A., Bradshaw, G. L., and Zytkow, J. M.. 1987. Scientific Discovery (Volume 1). Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Lau, Richard R. 1982. “Negativity in Political Perception.” Political Behavior 4(December): 353–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, Richard R. 1986. “Political Schemata, Candidate Evaluations, and Voting Behavior.” In R. R. Lau and D. O. Sears (eds.), Political Cognition (pp. 95–126). Hillsdale, NJ: ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
Lau, Richard R. 1989. “Construct Accessibility and Electoral Choice.” Political Behavior 11(March): 5–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, Richard R. 1992. Searchable Information during an Election Campaign. Unpublished manuscript, Rutgers UniversityGoogle Scholar
Lau, Richard R. 1995. “Information Search During an Election Campaign: Introducing a Process Tracing Methodology for Political Scientists.” In M. Lodge and K. McGraw (eds.), Political Judgment: Structure and Process (pp. 179–205). Ann Arbor:University of Michigan PressGoogle Scholar
Lau, Richard R. 2003. “Models of Decision Making.” In David O. Sears, Leonie Huddy, and Robert Jervis (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology (pp. 19–59). New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Lau, Richard R., and Erber, Ralph. 1985. “An Information Processing Perspective on Political Sophistication.” In Sidney Kraus and Richard Perloff (eds.), Mass Media and Political Thought (pp. 17–39). Beverly Hills, CA: SageGoogle Scholar
Lau, Richard R., Patel, Parina, Fahmy, Dalia F., and Kaufman, Robert R.. 2005. “Correct Voting Across 30 Democracies.” Paper presented at the 2005 annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, April 7–10
Lau, Richard R., and Redlawsk, David P.. 1992. “How Voters Decide: A Process Tracing Study of Decision Making During Political Campaigns.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, IL
Lau, Richard R., and Redlawsk, David P.. 1997. “Voting Correctly.” American Political Science Review 91(September): 585–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, Richard R., and Redlawsk, David P.. 2001a. “An Experimental Study of Information Search, Memory, and Decision Making During a Political Campaign.” In J. Kuklinski (ed.), Political Psychology and Public Opinion (pp. 136–159). New York: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Lau, Richard R., and Redlawsk, David P.. 2001b. “Advantages and Disadvantages of Cognitive Heuristics in Political Decision Making.” American Journal of Political Science 45(October): 951–971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, Richard R., and Sears, David O.. 1986. “Social Cognition and Political Cognition.” In Richard R. Lau and David O. Sears (eds.), Political Cognition: The 19th Annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition (pp. 347–366). Hillsdale, NJ:ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
Lau, Richard R., Sears, David O., and Centers, Richard. 1979. “The ‘Positivity Bias’ in Evaluations of Public Figures: Evidence Against Instrument Artifacts.” Public Opinion Quarterly 43(Fall): 347–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazarsfeld, Paul F., Berelson, Bernard R., and Gaudet, Hazel. 1944. The People's Choice. New York: Columbia University PressGoogle Scholar
Levy, Jack S. 2003. “Political Psychology and Foreign Policy.” In David O. Sears, Leonie Huddy, and Robert Jervis (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology (pp. 253–284). New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Lewin, Kurt. 1939. “Field Theory and Experiment in Social Psychology: Concepts and Methods.” American Journal of Sociology 44(3): 868–896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewin, Kurt. 1946. “Action Research and Minority Problems.” Journal of Social Issues 2(1): 34–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewin, Kurt. 1951. Field Theory in Social Science. New York: Harper & BrothersGoogle Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Rice, Tom W.. 1992. Forecasting Elections. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly PressGoogle Scholar
Lichtenstein, Sarah, and Slovic, Paul. 1971. “Reversals of Preference between Bids and Choices in Gambling Decisions.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 89(July): 46–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lichtenstein, Meryl, and Srull, Thomas K.. 1987. “Processing Objectives as a Determinant of the Relationship Between Recall and Judgment.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 23(March): 93–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindberg, Eric, Garling, Tommy, and Montgomery, Henry. 1989. “Differential Predictability of Preferences and Choices.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 2(October–December): 205–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindblom, Charles E. 1965. The Intelligence of Democracy. New York: Free PressGoogle Scholar
Lippmann, Walter. 1955. Essays in the Public Philosophy. Boston: Little, BrownGoogle Scholar
Lodge, Milton. 1995. “Toward a Procedural Model of Candidate Evaluation.” In M. Lodge and K. McGraw (eds.), Political Information Processing (pp. 111–139). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan PressGoogle Scholar
Lodge, Milton, and Hamill, Ruth. 1986. “A Partisan Schema for Political Information Processing.” American Political Science Review 80(June): 505–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, Milton, and McGraw, Kathleen M. (eds.). 1995. Political Judgment: Structure and Process. Ann Arbor:University of Michigan PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, Milton, McGraw, Kathleen M., and Stroh, Patrick. 1989. “An Impression Driven Model of Candidate Evaluation.” American Political Science Review 83(June): 399–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, Milton, and Stroh, Patrick. 1993. “Inside the Mental Voting Booth.” In S. Iyenger and R. McGuire (eds.), Political Psychology (pp. 225–263). Durham, NC: Duke University PressGoogle Scholar
Lodge, Milton, Stroh, Patrick, and Wahlke, John. 1990. “Black-box Models of Candidate Evaluation.”Political Behavior 12(March): 5–18CrossRef
Lodge, Milton, Steenbergen, Marco R., and Brau, Shawn. 1995. “The Responsive Voter: Campaign Information and the Dynamics of Candidate Evaluation.” American Political Science Review 89(June): 309–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, Milton, and Taber, Charles. 2000. “Three Steps Toward a Theory of Motivated Political Reasoning.” In Arthur Lupia, Mathew D. McCubbins, and Samuel L. Popkin (eds.), Elements of Reason (pp. 183–213). Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Luce, R. Duncan, and Raiffa, Howard. 1957. Games and Decisions: Introduction and Critical Survey. New York:WileyGoogle Scholar
Lodge, Milton, Charles Taber, and Christopher Weber, . Forthcoming. “First Steps Towards a Dual-Process Accessibility Model of Political Beliefs, Attitudes, and Behavior.” In David P. Redlawsk (ed.), Feeling Politics: Emotion in Political Information Processing.New York:Palgrave-Macmillan
Lupia, Arthur. 1992. “Busy Voters, Agenda Control, and the Power of Information.” American Political Science Review 86(June): 390–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupia, Arthur. 1994. “Shortcuts Versus Encyclopedias: Information and Voting Behavior in California Insurance Reform Elections.” American Political Science Review 88(March): 63–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupia, Arthur, and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1998. The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Really Need to Know? New York:Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Lupia, Arthur, McCubbins, Mathew D., and Popkin, Samuel L.. 2000. “Beyond Rationality: Reason and the Study of Politics.” In Arthur Lupia, Mathew D. McCubbins, and Samuel L. Popkin (eds.), Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice, and the Bounds of Rationality (pp. 1–20). New York:Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynd, Robert S., and Lynd, Helen Merrell. 1929. Middletown. New York: Harcourt, Brace & WorldGoogle Scholar
Lynd, Robert S., and Lynd, Helen Merrell. 1937. Middletown in Transition. New York: Harcourt, Brace & WorldGoogle Scholar
Macaluso, Theodore F. 1975. “Candidate Image: Personal Attribute and Issue Content.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, Nashville, TN
MacDonald, Paul K. 2003. “Useful Fiction or Miracle Maker: The Competing Epistemological Foundations of Rational Choice Theory.” American Political Science Review 97 (November): 551–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackelprang, A. J., Grofman, Bernard, and Keith, Thomas N.. 1976. “Electoral Change and Stability: Some New Perspectives.” In Samuel A. Kirkpatrick (ed.), American Electoral Behavior: Change and Stability. Beverly Hills, CA:SageGoogle Scholar
Malhotra, Naresh K. 1982. “Information Load and Consumer Decision Making.” Journal of Consumer Research 8(March): 419–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane J. 1983. Beyond Adversary Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
March, James G. 1978. “Bounded Rationality, Ambiguity, and the Engineering of Choice.” Bell Journal of Economics 9(Autumn): 578–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, James G. 1988. Decisions and Organizations. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
March, James G. 1994. A Primer on Decision Making. New York: Free PressGoogle Scholar
March, James G., and Olson, Johan P.. 1989. Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York:Free PressGoogle Scholar
March, James G., and Simon, Herbert A.. 1958. Organizations. New York: WileyGoogle Scholar
Marcus, George E. 1988. “The Structure of Emotional Response: 1984 Presidential Candidates.” American Political Science Review 82(September): 737–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcus, George E., and MacKuen, Michael B.. 1993. “Anxiety, Enthusiasm, and the Vote: The Emotional Underpinnings of Learning and Involvement During Presidential Campaigns.” American Political Science Review 87(September): 672–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcus, George E., W. Russell Neuman, and Michael MacKuen, . 2000. Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment.Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Markus, Gregory B., and Converse, Philip E.. 1979. “A Dynamic Simultaneous Equation Model of Electoral Choice.” American Political Science Review 73(December): 1055–1070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClosky, Herbert. 1964. “Consensus and Ideology in American Politics.” American Political Science Review 58(June): 361–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, Rose. 2002. “Experimental Methods in Political Science.” Annual Review of Political Science 5(1): 31–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGinniss, Joe. 1969. The Selling of the President. New York: Trident PressGoogle Scholar
McGraw, Kathleen M. 2000. “Contributions of the Cognitive Approach to Political Psychology.” Political Psychology 21(December): 805–832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGraw, Kathleen M., Fischle, Mark, and Stenner, Karen. 2000. “What Politicians ‘Know’ Depends on How They are Asked.” Unpublished manuscript
McGraw, Kathleen M., Lodge, Milton, and Stroh, Patrick. 1990. “On-line Processing in Candidate Evaluation: The Effects of Issue Order, Issue Salience, and Sophistication.” Political Behavior 12(March): 41–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGraw, Kathleen M., and Pinney, Neil. 1990. “The Effects of General and Domain-specific Expertise on Political Memory and Judgment.” Social Cognition 8(Spring): 9–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKelvey, Richard D., and Ordeshook, Peter C.. 1986. “Information, Electoral Equilibria, and the Democratic Ideal.” Journal of Politics 48(November): 909–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPhee, William. 1961. “Note on a Campaign Simulator.” Public Opinion Quarterly 25(Summer): 184–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meehl, Paul E, . 1954. Clinical versus Statistical Predictions: A Theoretical Analysis and Review of the Evidence.Minneapolis:University of Minnesota PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meehl, Paul E. 1977. “The Selfish Voter and the Thrown-Away Vote Argument.”American Political Science Review 71(March): 11–30CrossRef
Mellers, Barbara A., Schwartz, Alan, and Cooke, Alan. 1998. “Judgment and Decision Making.” Annual Review of Psychology 49: 447–477CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milech, Dan, and Finucane, Melissa. 1998. “Decision Support and Behavioral Decision Theory.” In Kim Kirsner and Craig Speelman (eds.), Implicit and Explicit Mental Processes (pp. 291–307). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
Miller, Arthur H., Wattenberg, Martin P., and Malanchuk, Oksana. 1986. “Schematic Assessments of Presidential Candidates.” American Political Science Review 80(June): 521–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, George A. 1956. “The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information.” Psychological Review 63(1): 81–97CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, Warren E. 1976. “The Challenges of Electoral Research.” In Samuel A. Kirkpatrick (ed.), American Electoral Behavior: Change and Stability. Beverly Hills, CA:SageGoogle Scholar
Miller, Warren E., and Shanks, J. Merrill. 1996. The New American Voter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Mills, Charles W. 1971. The Power Elite. London: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Mintz, Alex. 1997. “The Decison to Attack Iraq: A Noncompensatory Theory of Decisionmaking.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 37(December): 595–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mintz, Alex, and Geva, Nehemia. 1997. “The Poliheuristic Theory of Foreign Policy Decisionmaking.” In Nehemia Geva and Alex Mintz (eds.), Decisionmaking on War and Peace: The Cognitive-Rational Debate (pp. 81–101). Boulder, CO:Lynne Rienner PublishersGoogle Scholar
Mintz, Alex, Geva, Nehemia, Redd, Steven B., and Carnes, Amy. 1997. “The Effects of Dynamic and Static Choice Sets on Decision Strategy.” American Political Science Review 91(September): 553–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondak, Jeffrey J. 1993. “Public Opinion and Heuristic Processing of Source Cues.”Political Behavior 15(June): 167–192CrossRef
Morrell, Holly E. R., Gaitan, Santino, and Wixted, John T.. “On the Nature of the Decision Axis in Signal-Detection-Based Models of Recognition Memory.”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition. 28(November): 1095–1110.
Mueller, John E. 1970. “Presidential Popularity from Truman to Johnson.”American Political Science Review 64(March): 18–34CrossRef
Mueller, John. 1992. “Democracy and Ralph's Pretty Good Grocery: Elections, Equality, and Minimal Human Beings.”American Journal of Political Science 36(November): 983–1003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mutz, Diana C. 1997. “Mechanisms of Momentum: Does Thinking Make it So?Journal of Politics 59(February): 104–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, Stephen P. 2005. Voting the Agenda: Candidates, Elections and Ballot Propositions. Princeton, NJ:Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, Stephen P., Pantoja, Adrian, and Segura, Gary M.. 2002. “Ich bin ein Latino: Sophistication, Symbolism, Heuristics and Latino Preferences in the 2000 Presidential Election.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, MA, August 29–September 1
Nie, Norman H., and Kristi, Andersen. 1974. “Mass Belief Systems Revisited: Political Change and Attitude Structure.”Journal of Politics 36(August): 541–591CrossRef
Nie, Norman H., Verba, Sidney, and Petrocik, John R.. 1976. The Changing American Voter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Niemi, Richard G., and Bartels, Larry M.. 1985. “New Measures of Issue Salience: An Evaluation.” The Journal of Politics 47(November): 1212–1220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nisbett, Richard E., and Ross, Lee. 1980. Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-HallGoogle Scholar
Nisbett, Richard E., and Wilson, Timothy D.. 1977. “Telling More Than We Can Know: Verbal Reports on Mental Processes.” Psychological Review 84(March): 231–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norman, Donald A. 1976. Memory and Attention: An Introduction to Human Information Processing. New York:WileyGoogle Scholar
Norman, Donald A. 1982. Learning and Memory. San Francisco: FreemanGoogle Scholar
Norusis, Marija J. 1994. SPSS for Windows Advanced Statistics Release 6. Chicago: SPSSGoogle Scholar
Olshavsky, Richard W. 1979. “Task Complexity and Contingent Processing in Decision Making: A Replication and Extension.” Organization Behavior and Human Performance 24(December): 300–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, Benjamin I., and Robert Y. Shapiro. 1992. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans' Policy Preferences.Chicago:University of Chicago PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, Thomas E., 1980. The Mass Media Election: How Americans Choose Their President.New York:PraegerGoogle Scholar
Payne, John W. 1976. “Task Complexity and Contingent Processing in Decision Making: An Information Search and Protocol Analysis.” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 16(August): 366–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, John. W. 1980. “Information Processing Theory: Some Concepts and Methods Applied to Decision Research.” In T. S. Wallsten (ed.), Cognitive Processes in Choice and Decision Behavior. Hillsdale, NJ:ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
Payne, John W., Bettman, James R., and Johnson, Eric J.. 1988. “Adaptive Strategy Selection in Decision Making.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 14(July): 534–552Google Scholar
Payne, John W., Bettman, James R., and Johnson, Eric J.. 1992. “Behavioral Decision Research: A Constructive Processing Perspective.” Annual Review of Psychology 43: 87–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, John W., Bettman, James R., and Johnson, Eric J.. 1993. The Adaptive Decision Maker.New York: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, John W., and Braunstein, Myron L.. 1978. “Risky Choice: An Examination of Information Acquisition Behavior.” Memory & Cognition 6(September): 554–561CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Payne, John W., Braunstein, Myron L., and Carroll, John S.. 1978. “Exploring Predecisional Behavior: An Alternative Approach to Decision Research.” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 22(August): 17–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perlmutter, Marvon. 1983. “Learning and Memory Through Adulthood.” In Matilda White Riley, Beth B. Hess, and Kathleen Bond (eds.), Aging in Society: Selected Reviews of Recent Research (pp. 219–241). Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
Pitz, Gordon, and Sachs, Natalie. 1984. “Judgment and Decision: Theory and Application.” Annual Review of Psychology 35: 139–163CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plutzer, Eric, and Zipp, John F.. 1996. “Identity Politics, Partisanship, and Voting for Women Candidates.” Public Opinion Quarterly 60(Spring): 30–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pomper, Gerald M. 1972. “From Confusion to Clarity: Issues and American Voters, 1956–1968.” American Political Science Review 66(June): 415–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pomper, Gerald M. 1976. “Impacts on the Political System.” In Kirkpatrick, Samuel A. (ed.), American Electoral Behavior: Change and Stability.Beverly Hills, CA:SageGoogle Scholar
Pomper, Gerald M. 2001. The Election of 2000.New York: Chatham HouseGoogle Scholar
Pool, Ithiel de Sola, and Robert Abelson. 1961. “The Simulmatics Project.” The Public Opinion Quarterly 25(Summer):167–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popkin, Samuel L. 1991 . The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns.Chicago:University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Popper, Karl. 1959. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Basic BooksGoogle Scholar
Prothro, James W., and Grigg, Charles W.. 1960. “Fundamental Principles of Democracy: Bases of Agreement and Disagreement.” Journal of Politics 22(May): 276–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purkitt, Helen E., and Dyson, James W.. 1988. “An Experimental Study of Cognitive Processes and Information in Political Problem Solving.” Acta Psychologica 68(September): 329–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Hillary. 1982. “Three Kinds of Scientific Realism.” Philosophical Quarterly 32(April): 195–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quadrel, Marilyn J., Baruch Fischfoff, and William David, . 1993. “Adolescent (In)vulnerability.” American Psychologist 48(February): 102–116Google Scholar
Rabinowitz, George, and Stuart Elaine MacDonald. 1989. “A Directional Theory of Issue Voting.” American Political Science Review 83(March): 93–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahn, Wendy M. 1993. “The Role of Partisan Stereotypes in Information Processing about Political Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science 37(May): 472–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahn, Wendy M., Aldrich, John H., and Borgida, Eugene. 1994. “Individual and Contextual Variations in Political Candidate Appraisal.” American Political Science Review 88(March): 193–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahn, Wendy M., Aldrich, John H., Borgida, Eugene, and Sullivan, John L.. 1990. “A Social-Cognitive Model of Candidate Appraisal.” In John A. Ferejohn and James H. Kuklinski (eds.), Information and Democratic Processes.Chicago: University of Illinois PressGoogle Scholar
Rahn, Wendy M., Krosnick, Jon A., and Breuning, Marijke. 1994. “Rationalization and Derivation Processes in Survey Studies of Political Candidate Evaluation.” American Journal of Political Science 38(August): 582–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raiffa, Howard. 1968. Decision Analysis: Introductory Lectures on Choices Under Uncertainty. Reading, MA:Addison-WesleyGoogle Scholar
Reder, Lynn M., and Anderson, John R.. 1980. “A Partial Resolution of the Paradox of Interference: The Role of Integrating Knowledge.” Cognitive Psychology 12(October): 447–472CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Redlawsk, David P. 1992. “Using Hypermedia to Develop a Political Science Simulation.” Paper presented at the 25th annual meeting of the Association of Small Computer Users in Education (ASCUE), Myrtle Beach, SC
Redlawsk, David P. 1995a. “Conducting Political Science Research Using Multimedia.” Paper prepared for the 28th annual meeting of the Association of Small Computer Users in Education (ASCUE), Myrtle Beach, SC
Redlawsk, David P. 1995b. “How voters use campaign information.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago
Redlawsk, David P. 2001a. “You Must Remember This: A Test of the On-line Voting Model.” Journal of Politics 63(February): 29–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redlawsk, David P. 2001b. “Implications of Motivated Reasoning for Voter Information Processing.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, and at the annual meeting of the International Society for Political Psychology, Cuernavaca, Mexico
Redlawsk, David P. 2002. “Hot Cognition or Cool Consideration? Testing the Effects of Motivated Reasoning on Political Decision Making.” Journal of Politics 64(November): 1021–1044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redlawsk, David P. 2004. “What Voters Do: Information Search During Election Campaigns.”Political Psychology 25(4): 595–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redlawsk, David P., and Lau, Richard R.. 1995. “The Miserly Voter: Heuristics and Rational Voting Behavior.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago
Redlawsk, David P., and Lau, Richard R.. 2003. “Do Voters Want Candidates They Like of Candidates They Agree With? Affect vs. Cognition in Voter Decision Making.” Paper presented at the Shambaugh Conference on Affect and Cognition in Political Action, University of Iowa, March 6–9, and the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April 3–6
Reyes, R. M., Thompson, W. C., and Bower., Gordon H. 1980. “Judgmental Biases Resulting from Differing Availabilities of Arguments.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39(July): 2–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riggle, Ellen D. B., Mitzi, M. S. Johnson, and Hickey, Scot. 1996. “Information Monitoring of Strategic Decision Making: a Process Tracing Demonstration.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago
Riggle, Ellen D., Ottati, Victor, Wyer, Robert S., Kuklinski, James, and Schwartz, Norbert. 1992. “Bases of Political Judgments: The Role of Stereotypic and Nonstereotypic Information.” Political Behavior 14(March): 67–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riker, William H., and Ordeshook, Peter C.. 1968. “A Theory of the Calculus of Voting.” American Political Science Review 62(March): 25–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riker, William H., and Ordeshook, Peter. 1973. An Introduction to Positive Political Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-HallGoogle Scholar
Rosch, Ellen. 1978. “Principles of Categorization.” In Ellen Rosch and B. B. Lloyd (eds.), Cognition and Categorization (pp. 28–50). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, Shawn W., Kahn, Shulamit, and Tran, Thuy. 1991. “Creating a Political Image: Shaping Appearance and Manipulating the Vote.” Political Behavior 13(December): 345–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenstone, Steven J. 1983. Forecasting Presidential Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossi, Peter H. 1959. “Four Landmarks in Voting Research.” In Eugene Burdick and Arthur J Brodbeck (eds.), American Voting Behavior. New York: Free PressGoogle Scholar
Rothkopf, Ernst Z., Dashen, Monica, and Teft, Kim. “Aggregation in Memory of Episodic Influences on Rule-Guided Decisions.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 28(September): 983–998
Rubenstein, Albert H. 1998. Modeling Bounded Rationality. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Russo, J. Edward. 1977. “The Value of Unit Price Information.” Journal of Marketing Research 14(May): 193–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russo, J. Edward, and Dosher, Barbara A.. 1983. “Strategies for Multiattribute Binary Choice.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 17(September): 676–696Google Scholar
Sargent, T. J. 1993. Bounded Rationality in Macroeconomics. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
Savage, Leonard J. 1954. The Foundations of Statistics. New York: WileyGoogle Scholar
Schattschneider, Elmer E. 1960. The Semi-Sovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America.New York:HoltGoogle Scholar
Sears, David O, . 1975. “Political Socialization.” In Fred I. Greenstein and Nelson W. Polsby (eds.), Handbook of Political Science (Vol. 2, pp. 93–127). Menlo Park, CA:Addison-WesleyGoogle Scholar
Sears, David O. 1986. “College Sophomores in the Laboratory: Influences of a Narrow Database on Social Psychology's View of Human Nature.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51: 515–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sears, David O., and , Carolyn Funk. 1991. “The Role of Self-Interest in Social and Political Attitudes.” In L. Berkowitz (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 24, pp. 1–91). New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Sears, David O., Lau, Richard R., Tyler, Tom R., and Allen, Jr., Harris M. 1980. “Self-Interest versus Symbolic Politics in Policy Attitudes and Presidential Voting.” American Political Science Review 74(September): 670–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaffer, William R. 1972. Computer Simulations of Voting Behavior. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Shanteau, J. 1988. “Psychological Characteristics and Strategies of Expert Decision Makers.” Acta Psychological 68(2): 203–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanteau, J. 1992. “How Much Information Does an Expert Use? Is It Relevant?”Acta Psychologica 81(1): 75–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shugan, Steven M. 1980. “The Cost of Thinking.” Journal of Consumer Research 7(September): 99–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, Herbert A. 1947. Administrative Behavior. New York: MacmillanGoogle Scholar
Simon, Herbert. 1955. “A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 69(February): 99–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, Herbert. 1956. “Rational Choice and the Structure of the Environment.”American Psychologist 63(February): 129–138
Simon, Herbert A. 1957. Models of Man: Social and Rational. New York:WileyGoogle Scholar
Simon, Herbert A. 1979. “Information Processing Models of Cognition.” Annual Review of Psychology 30: 363–396CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simon, Herbert A. 1985. “Human Nature in Politics: The Dialogue of Psychology with Political Science.” American Political Science Review 79(June): 293–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, Herbert A. 1995. “Rationality in Political Behavior.” Political Psychology 16(March): 45–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slovic, Paul, Fischhoff, Baruch, and Lichtenstein, Sara. 1977. “Behavioral Decision Theory.” Annual Review of Psychology 28: 1–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slovic, Paul, Fischhoff, Baruch, and Lichtenstein, Sara. 1982. “Response Mode, Framing, and Information Processing Effects in Risk Assessment.” In Robin Hogarth (ed.), New Directions for Methodology of Social and Behavioral Science: The Framing of Questions and the Consistency of Response (pp. 21–36). San Francisco:Jossey-BassGoogle Scholar
Slovic, Paul, and Lichtenstein, Sara. 1971. “Comparison of Bayesian and Regression Approaches to the Study of Information Processing in Judgment.” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 6(4): 649–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Elliot. 1989. The Unchanging American Voter. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
Smith, Elliott R. 1998. “Mental Representation and Memory.” In Daniel T. Gilbert, Susan T. Fiske, and Gardner Lindzey (eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology (Volume I, 4th edition, pp. 391–445). Boston: McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
Sniderman, Paul M. 1993. “The New Look in Public Opinion Research.” In Ada W. Finifter (ed.), Political Science: The State of the Discipline II (pp. 219–245). Washington, DC:American Political Science AssociationGoogle Scholar
Sniderman, Paul M., Brody, Richard A., and Tetlock, Philip E.. 1991. Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology. New York:Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sniderman, Paul M., Hagen, Michael G., Tetlock, Philip E., and Brady, Henry E.. 1986. “Reasoning Chains: Causal Models of Policy Reasoning in Mass Publics.” British Journal of Political Science 16(July): 405–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squire, Pevrill. 1992. “Challenger Quality and Voting Behavior in U.S. Senate Elections.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 17(May): 247–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srull, Thomas K. 1981. “Person Memory: Some Tests of Associative Storage and Retrieval Models.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 7(November): 440–463Google Scholar
Staelin, Richard, and Payne, John W.. 1976. “Studies of the Information-Seeking Behavior of Consumers.” In J. S. Carroll and J. W. Payne (eds.), Cognition and Social Behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
Steenbergen, Marco. 2001. “The Reverend Bayes Meets John Q. Public: Patterns of Political Belief Updating in Citizens.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology, Cuernavaca, Mexico
Steenbergen, Marco, and Lodge, Milton. 1998. “Process Matters: Cognitive Models of Candidate Evaluations.” Paper presented a the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, MA
Stigler, George J. 1961. “The Economics of InformationJournal of Political Economy 69(2): 213–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, Donald E., Campbell, Angus, and Miller, Warren E.. 1958. “Components of Electoral Decision.” American Political Science Review 52(June): 367–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svenson, Ola. 1979. “Process Descriptions of Decision Making.” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 23(February): 86–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taber, Charles S., and Steenbergen, Marco R.. 1995. “Computational Experiments in Electoral Behavior.” In Milton Lodge and Kathleen M. McGraw (eds.), Political Judgment: Structure and Process (pp. 141–178). Ann Arbor:University of Michigan PressGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah., 1990. You Just Don't Understand: Women and Men in Conversation.New York:MorrowGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Shelley E. 1981. “The Interface of Cognitive and Social Psychology.” In John Harvey (ed.), Cognition, Social Behavior, and the Environment (pp. 189–211). Hillsdale, NJ: ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
Tetlock, Philip E. 1993. “Cognitive Structural Analysis of Political Rhetoric: Methodological and Theoretical Issues.” In Shanto Iyengar and William J. McGuire (eds.), Explorations in Political Psychology (pp. 380–405). Durham, NC:Duke University PressGoogle Scholar
Trilling, Richard J. 1976. “Party Image and Electoral Behavior.” In Samuel A. Kirkpatrick (ed.), American Electoral Behavior: Change and Stability. Beverly Hills, CA:SageGoogle Scholar
Tversky, Amos. 1969. “Intransitivity of Preferences.” Psychological Review 76(January): 31–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, Amos. 1972. “Elimination by Aspects: A Theory of Choice.” Psychological Review 79(May): 281–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, Amos, and Kahneman, Daniel. 1973. “Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability.” Cognitive Psychology 5(April): 207–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, Amos, and Kahneman, Daniel. 1974. “Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.” Science 185(4157): 1124–1131CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman. 1981. “The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice.” Science 211(4481): 453–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, Amos, and Kahneman, Daniel. 1986. “Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions.” Journal of Business 59(October): S251–S278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, Amos, and Kahneman, Daniel. 1992. “Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5(October): 297–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, Amos, and Sattath, Shmuel. 1979. “Preference Trees.” Psychological Review 86(September): 542–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, Amos, Sattath, Shmuel, and Slovic, Paul. 1988. “Contingent Weighting in Judgment and Choice.” Psychological Review 95(July): 371–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neuman, John, and Morgenstern, Oscar. 1947. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Vriend, Nicolaas J. 1996. “Rational Behavior and Economic Theory.”Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 29(March): 263–285CrossRef
Wahlke, John C. 1979. “Pre-Behavioralism in Political Science.” American Political Science Review 73(March): 9–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wattenberg, Martin P. 1981. “The Decline of Political Partisanship in the United States: Negativity or Neutrality?American Political Science Review 75(December): 941–950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weir, Blair T. 1975. “The Distortion of Voter Recall.” American Journal of Political Science 19(February): 53–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Daniel C., Weber, Stephen J., Haaland, Gordon A., Mueller, Ronald H., and Craig, Robert E.. 1976. “Voter Decisionmaking in a Primary Election: An Evaluation of Three Models of Choice.”American Journal of Political Science 20(February): 37–49CrossRef
Winneg, Kenneth, and Jomini, Talia. 2004. “The Internet as a Source of Campaign Information: An Analysis of its use in the 2004 Democratic Presidential Primary Campaign.” Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Phoenix, AZ
Winter, S. G. 1975. “Optimization and Evolution in the Theory of the Firm.” In R. H. Day and T. Groves (eds.), Adaptive Economic Models (pp. 73–118). New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Wright, P. 1975. “Consumer Choice Strategies: Simplifying vs. Optimizing.” Journal of Marketing Research 12(February): 60–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyer, Robert S., and Srull, Thomas K.. 1980. “The Processing of Social Stimulus Information: A Conceptual Integration.” In Reid Hastie, Thomas M. Ostrom, Ebbe E. Ebbesen, Robert S. Wyer, Jr., David L. Hamilton, and Donal E. Carlston (eds.), Person Memory: The Cognitive Basis of Social Perception. Hillsdale, NJ:ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
Wyer, Robert S., and Srull, Thomas K.. 1986. “Human Cognition in its Social Context.”Psychological Review 93(July): 322–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyer, Robert S., and Srull, Thomas K.. 1988. “Understanding Social Knowledge: If Only the Data Could Speak for Themselves.” In Daniel Bar-Tal and Arie W. Kruglanski (eds.), The Social Psychology of Knowledge. Cambridge:Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Zajonc, Robert B. 1968. “Attitudinal Effects of Mere Exposure.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 9(January): 1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaller, John R. 1992. The Nature and Origin of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, Manfred. 1989. “The Nervous System in the Context of Information Theory.” In R. F. Schmidt and G. Thews (eds.), Human Physiology (2nd edition, pp. 166–173). Berlin:Springler-VerlagGoogle Scholar
Abelson, Robert P., and Levi, Ariel. 1985. “Decision Making and Decision Theory.” In Gardner Lindzey and Elliot Aronson (eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology (Volume I, 3rd edition, pp. 231–309). New York: Random HouseGoogle Scholar
Abramowitz, Alan I. 1989. “Viability, Electability, and Candidate Choice in a Presidential Primary Election: A Test of Competing Models.” Journal of Politics 51(November): 977–992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abramson, Paul R., Aldrich, John H., Paolino, Phil, and Rhode, David W.. 1992. “‘Sophisticated’ Voting in the 1988 Presidential Primaries.” American Political Science Review 86(March): 55–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Achen, Christopher H. 1975. “Mass Political Attitudes and the Survey Response.”American Political Science Review 69 (December): 1218–1231CrossRef
Alba, Joseph W., and Marmorstein, Howard. 1987. “The Effects of Frequency Knowledge on Consumer Decision Making.” Journal of Consumer Research 14(June): 14–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, John H. 1980. Before the Convention: Strategies and Choices in Presidential Nomination Campaigns.Chicago:University of Chicago PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, John H. 1993. “Rational Choice and Turnout.” American Journal of Political Science 37(February): 246–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, John H., and Alvarez, R. Michael. 1994. “Issues and the presidential primary voter.”Political Behavior 16(September): 289–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Herbert E. 1975. Financing the 1972 Election. Lexington, MA: Lexington BooksGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Herbert E. 1979. Financing the 1976 Election. Washington, DC: Congressional QuarterlyGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Herbert E. 1983. Financing the 1980 Election. Lexington, MA: Lexington BooksGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Herbert E., and Bauer, Monica. 1991. Financing the 1988 Election. Boulder, CO: Westview PressGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Herbert E., and Corrado, Anthony. 1995. Financing the 1992 Election. Armonk, NY: M. E. SharpeGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Herbert E., and Haggerty, Brian A.. 1987. Financing the 1984 Election. Lexington, MA: Lexington BooksGoogle Scholar
Allison, Graham T. 1971. Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. Boston:Little, BrownGoogle Scholar
Allison, Graham T., and Zelikow, Philip D.. 1999. Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis (2nd edition). New York:LongmanGoogle Scholar
Anderson, John R. 1983. The Architecture of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Anderson, John R.. 1973. Human Associative Memory. New York:WileyGoogle Scholar
Anderson, John R., Byrne, Michael D., Douglass, Scott, Lebiere, Christian, and Qin, Yulin. 2004. “An Integrated Theory of the Mind.” Psychological Review 111(4): 1036–1060CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, Norman H. 1965. “Primacy Effects in Personality Impression Formation Using a Generalized Order Effect Paradigm.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2: 1–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, Norman H. 1981 . Foundations of Information Integration Theory. New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Iyengar, Shanto. 1995. Going Negative: How Political Advertisements Shrink and Polarize the Electorate. New York:Free PressGoogle Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth J. 1951. Social Choice and Individual Values. New York: John Wiley and SonsGoogle Scholar
Aschenbrenner, K. M., Bockenholt, U., Albert, D., and Schmalhofer, F.. 1986. “The Selection of Dimensions When Choosing Between Multiattribute Alternatives.” In R. W. Scholz (ed.), Current Issues in West German Decision Research (pp. 63–78). Frankfurt: LangGoogle Scholar
Bargh, John A. 1989. “Preconscious and Postconscious Automaticity in Social Perception.” In J. S. Uleman and J. A. Bargh (eds.), Unintended Thought (pp. 3–51). New York: Guilford PressGoogle Scholar
Bargh, John A., and Thein, R. R.. 1985. “Individual Construct Accessibility, Person Memory, and the Recall-judgment Link: the Case of Information Overload.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49: 1129–1146CrossRef
Bartels, Larry M. 1988. Presidential Primaries and the Dynamics of Public Choice.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 1996. “Uninformed Votes: Information Effects in Presidential Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 40(February): 194–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassili, John N. 1995. “Response Latency and the Accessibility of Voting Intentions: What Contributes to Accessibility and How It Affects Vote Choice.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 21(July): 686–695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belmore, S. M. 1987. “Determinants of Attention during Impression Formation.” Journal of Experiment Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 13: 480–489Google Scholar
Ben Zur, Hasida, and Breznitz, Shlomo J.. 1981. “The Effects of Time Pressure on Risky Choice Behavior.” Acta Psycologica 47(February): 89–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, W. Lance. 1988. News: The Politics of Illusion (2nd ed.). New York:LongmanGoogle Scholar
Bennett, W. Lance. 1992. The Governing Crisis: Media, Money, and Marketing in American Elections.New York:St. Martin's PressGoogle Scholar
Berleson, Bernard R., Lazarsfeld, Paul F., and McPhee, William. 1954. Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago:University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Berns, Walter. 1962. “Voting Studies.” In Herbert Storing, Essays on the Scientific Study of Politics (pp. 1–62). New York: Holt, Rinehart and WinstonGoogle Scholar
Bettman, James R., Johnson, Eric J., Luce, M. F., and Payne, John W.. 1993. “Correlation, Conflict, and Choice.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition 19(July): 931–951Google Scholar
Bhaskar, Roy. 1997. A Realist Theory of Science. New York: VersoGoogle Scholar
Biggs, Stanley F., Bedard, Jean C., Gaber, Brian G., and Linsmeier, Thomas J.. 1985. “The Effects of Task Size and Similarity on the Decision Behavior of Bank Loan Officers.” Management Science 31(August): 970–987CrossRef
Billings, Robert S., and Marcus, Stephen A.. 1983. “Measures of Compensatory and Noncompensatory Models of Decision Behavior: Process Tracing versus Policy Capturing.” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 31(June): 331–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billings, Robert S., and Scherer, Lisa L.. 1988. “The Effects of Response Mode and Importance on Decision-making Strategies: Judgment vs. Choice.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 41(1): 1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bockenholt, Ulf, Albert, Dietrich, Aschenbrenner, Michael, and Schmalhofer, Franz. 1991. “The Effects of Attractiveness, Dominance and Attribute Differences on Information Acquisition in Multiattribute Binary Choice.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 49(August): 258–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, Henry E. 1985. “The Perils of Survey Research: Inter-Personally Incomparable Responses.” Political Methodology 11(3): 269–291Google Scholar
Brady, Henry E., and Sniderman, Paul M.. 1985. “Attitude Attribution: A Group Basis for Political Reasoning.” American Political Science Review 79(December): 1061–1078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunswik, E. 1957. “Scope and Aspects of the Cognitive Problem.” In H. Gruber, K. R. Hammond, and R. Jessor (eds.), Contemporary Approaches to Cognition (pp. 5–31). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, Bruce. 1987. The Citizen's Presidency: Standards of Choice and Judgment. Washington, DC:Congressional Quarterly PressGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, Bruce. 1988. “Sizing up Candidates in Private Lives and Public Careers.” PS: Political Science and Politics 21(Spring): 250–256Google Scholar
Burnham, Walter Dean. 1965. “The Changing Shape of the American Political Universe.”American Political Science Review 59(March): 7–28CrossRef
Burnham, Walter Dean. 1974. “Theory and Voting Research: Some Reflections on Converse's ‘Change in the American Electorate.’American Political Science Review 68(December): 1002–1023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bystrom, Dianne G., Mary, Christine Banwart, Lynda, Lee Kaid, and Terry, A. Robertson. 2004. Gender and Candidate Communication: Videostyle, Webstyle, Newsstyle. New York:RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Gurin, Gerald, and Miller, Warren E.. 1954. The Voter Decides. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson & CompanyGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1960. The American Voter. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Donald T., and Stanley, Julian C.. 1963. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Chicago:Rand McNallyGoogle Scholar
Cantor, Nancy, and Mischel, Walter. 1979. “Prototypes in Person Perception.” In Leonard Berkowitz (ed.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Volume 12, pp. 3–25). New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Carlston, Donal E. 1980. “The Recall and Use of Traits and Events in Social Inference Processes.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 16(3): 303–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmines, Edward G., and Kuklinski, James H.. 1990. “Incentives, Opportunities, and the Logic of Public Opinion in American Political Representation.” In John A. Ferejohn and James H. Kuklinski (eds.), Information and Democratic Processes (pp. 240–268). Urbana: University of Illinois PressGoogle Scholar
Carmines, Edward G., and Stimson, James A.. 1980. “The Two Faces of Issue Voting.” American Political Science Review 74, 78–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, John S., and Johnson, Eric J.. 1990. Decision Research: A Field Guide. Beverly Hills, CA:SageGoogle Scholar
Chase, William G., and Simon, Herbert A.. 1973. “Perception in Chess.” Cognitive Psychology 4(January): 55–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connolly, William E. 1972. “On ‘Interests’ in Politics.” Politics and Society 2(Summer): 459–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conover, Pamela J., and Feldman, Stanley. 1984. “How People Organize Their Political World: A Schematic Model.” American Journal of Political Science 28(February): 95–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conover, Pamela J., and Feldman, Stanley. 1986. “The Role of Inference in the Perception of Political Candidates.” In Richard R. Lau and David O. Sears (eds.), Political Cognition: The 19th Annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition (pp. 127–158). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
Conover, Pamela J., and Feldman, Stanley. 1989. “Candidate Perception in an Ambiguous World: Campaigns, Cues, and Inference Processes.” American Journal of Political Science 33 (November): 912–940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conover, Pamela Johnston, Virginia, Gray, and Steven, Coombs. 1982. “Single-Issue Voting: Elite-Mass Linkages.” Political Behavior 4 (December): 309–331Google Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1964. “Attitudes and Non-Attitudes: Continuation of a Dialogue.” In Edward Tufte (ed.), The Quantitative Analysis of Social Problems. (pp. 206–261). Reading, MA:Addison-WesleyGoogle Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1975. “Public Opinion and Voting Behavior.” In Fred Greenstein and Nelson Polsby (eds.), Handbook of Political Science (Volume 4, pp. 75–170). Reading, MA: Addison-WesleyGoogle Scholar
Converse, Philip E., and Gregory B. Markus. 1979. “Plus ca Change: The New CPS Election Study.”American Political Science Review 73(March): 32–49CrossRef
Corrado, Anthony. 1997. “Financing the 1996 Elections.” In Gerald M. Pomper (ed.), The Election of 1996 (pp. 135–172). Chatham, NJ: Chatham House PublishersGoogle Scholar
Corrado, Anthony. 2001. “Financing the 2000 Elections.” In Gerald M. Pomper (ed.), The Election of 2000 (pp. 92–124). Chatham, NJ: Chatham House PublishersGoogle Scholar
Corrado, Anthony, and Firestone, Charles M. (eds.). 1996. Elections in Cyberspace: Toward a New Era in American Politics. Washington, DC:Aspen InstituteGoogle Scholar
Crawford, Mary E. 1995. Talking Difference: On Gender ad Language. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage Publications
Czerlinski, Jean, Gerd, Gigerenzer, and Goldstein, Daniel G.. 1999. “How Good Are Simple Heuristics?” In Gerd Gigerenzer, Peter M. Todd, and the ABC Research Group (eds.), Simple Heuristics that Make Us Smart (pp. 97–118). New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1961. Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City.New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1989. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
Davis, Otto A., Hinich, Melvin J., and Ordeshook, Peter C.. 1970. “An Expository Development of a Mathematical Model of the Electoral Process.” American Political Science Review 64(June): 426–448Google Scholar
Dawes, Robyn M. 1979. “The Robust Beauty of Improper Linear Models in Decision Making.” American Psychologist 34(July): 571–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawes, Robyn M. 1988. Rational Choice in an Uncertain World.New York: Harcourt Brace JovanovichGoogle Scholar
Dawes, Robyn M. 1998. “Behavioral Decision Making and Judgment.” In Daniel T. Gilbert, Susan T. Fiske, and Gardner Lindzey (eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology (Volume I, 4th edition, pp. 497–548). Boston: McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
DeClercq, Eugene, Hurley, Thomas L., and Luttberg, Norman. 1976. “Voting in American Presidential Elections: 1956–1972.” In Samuel A. Kirkpatrick (ed.), American Electoral Behavior: Change and Stability. Beverly Hills, CA:SageGoogle Scholar
Delli Carpini, Michael, and Keeter, Scott. 1996. What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and RowGoogle Scholar
Druckman, James N., and Lupia, Arthus. 2000. “Preference Formation.”Annual Review of Political Science 3: 1–24CrossRef
Easton, David. 1953. The Political System: An Inquiry into the State of Political Science. New York:KnopfGoogle Scholar
Easton, David. 1965. A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York: WileyGoogle Scholar
Einhorn, Hillel J. 1970. “The Use of Nonlinear, Noncompensatory Models in Decision Making.” Psychological Bulletin 73: 211–230CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Einhorn, Hillel J., and Hogarth, Robin M.. 1975. “Unit Weighting Schemes for Decision Making.” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 13(April): 171–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Einhorn, Hillel J., and Hogarth, Robin M.. 1981. “Behavioral Decision Theory: Processes of Judgment and Choice.” Annual Review of Psychology 32: 53–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enelow, James M., and Hinich, Melvin J.. 1984. The Spatial Theory of Voting: An Introduction. New York:Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Ericsson, K. Anders, and Simon, Herbert A.. 1980. Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data. Cambridge, MA:MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Ferejohn, John A., and Fiorina, Morris P.. 1974. “The Paradox of Not Voting: A Decision Theoretic Analysis.” American Political Science Review 68(June): 525–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Festinger, Leon. 1957. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University PressGoogle Scholar
Finnigan, Simon, Humphreys, Michael S.., Dennis, Simon, and Geffen, Gina. 2002. “ERP ‘Old/New’ Effects: Memory Strength and Decisional Factors.” Neuropsychologia 40: 2288–2304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 1976. “The Voting Decision: Instrumental and Expressive Aspects.” Journal of Politics 38(May): 390–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Gregory W., and Hawkins, Scott A.. 1993. “Strategy Compatibility, Scale Compatibility, and the Prominence Effect.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 19(June): 580–597Google Scholar
Fischer, Gregory W., and Johnson, Eric J.. 1986. “Behavioral Decision Theory.” In Richard R. Lau and David O. Sears (eds.), Political Cognition (pp. 55–65). Hillsdale, NJ: ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
Fischoff, Baruch, Slovic, Paul, and Lichtenstein, Sarah. 1978. “Fault Trees: Sensitivity of Estimated Failure Probabilities to Problem Representation.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 4(May): 330–344Google Scholar
Fishman, Mark. 1980. Manufacturing the News. Austin: University of Texas PressGoogle Scholar
Fiske, Susan T., Kinder, Donald R., and Larter, W. Michael. 1983. “The Novice and the Expert: Knowledge-Based Strategies in Political Cognition.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 19(July): 381–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiske, Susan T., Lau, Richard R., and Smith, Richard A.. 1990. “On the Variety and Utility of Political Knowledge Structures.” Social Cognition 8(Spring): 31–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiske, Susan T., and Pavelchak, Mark A.. 1986. “Category-Based versus Piecemeal-Based Affective Responses: Developments in Schema-Triggered Affect.” In Richard M. Sorrentino and E. Tory Higgins (eds.), The Handbook of Motivation and Cognition: Foundations of Social Behavior (pp. 167–203). New York:GuilfordGoogle Scholar
Fiske, Susan T., and Taylor, Shelley E.. 1991. Social Cognition (2nd edition). New York: McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
Flanigan, William H., and Zingale, Nancy H. 1983. Political Behavior of the American Electorate (5th edition). Boston: Allyn and BaconGoogle Scholar
Ford, Gary T., and Smith, Ruth Ann. 1987. “Inferential Beliefs in Consumer Evaluations: An Assessment of Alternative Processing Strategies.” Journal of Consumer Research 14(December): 363–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, Kevin J., Schmitt, Neal, Schechtman, Susan L., Hults, Brian M., and Doherty, Mary L.. 1989. “Process Tracing Methods: Contributions, Problems, and Neglected Research Questions.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 43(February): 75–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, Thomas. 2004. What's the Matter with Kansas? How Conservatives Won the Heart of America. New York: Metropolitan BooksGoogle Scholar
Frankenberger, Kristina D., and Albaum, Gerald S.. 1997. “Using Behavioral Decision Theory to Assess Advertisement Recognition Tasks by Level of Difficulty.” Psychology & Marketing 14(March): 145–1623.0.CO;2-D>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, Mark N. 1996. “Electoral Participation.” In Lawrence LeDuc, Richard G. Niemi, and Pippa Norris (eds.), Comparing Democracies: Elections and Voting in Global Perspective (pp. 216–235). Thousand Oaks, CA: SageGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Jeffrey (ed.). 1995. The Rational Choice Controversy. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Milton. (ed.). 1953. Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Gabrielcik, Adele, and Fazio, Russel H.. 1984. “Priming and Frequency Estimation: A Strict Test of the Availability Heuristic.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 10(March): 85–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gans, Herbert. 1979. Deciding What's News. New York: Vintage BooksGoogle Scholar
Gant, Michael M., and Davis, Dwight F.. 1984. “Mental Economy and Voter Rationality: The Informed Citizen Problem in Voting Research.” Journal of Politics 46(February): 132–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, Alan, and Green, Donald. 1999. “Misperceptions about Perceptual Bias.”Annual Review of Political Science 2: 189–210CrossRef
Gettys, Charles F., Pliske, Rebecca M., Manning, Carol, and Casey, Jeff T.. 1987. “An Evaluation of Human Act Generation Performance.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 39(February): 23–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geva, Nehemia, and Mintz, Alex (eds.). 1997. Decisionmaking on War and Peace: The Cognitive-Rational Debate. Boulder, CO:Lynne RiennerGoogle Scholar
Gigerenzer, Gerd, and Goldstein, Daniel G.. 1999. “Betting on One Good Reason: The Take the Best Heuristic.” In Gerd Gigerenzer, Peter M. Todd, and the ABC Research Group (eds.), Simple Heuristics that Make Us Smart (pp. 75–95). New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Gigerenzer, Gerd, and Todd, Peter M.. 1999. “Fast and Frugal Heuristics: The Adaptive Toolbox.” In Gerd Gigerenzer, Peter M. Todd, and the ABC Research Group (eds.), Simple Heuristics that Make Us Smart (pp. 3–34). New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, Daniel T. 1998. “Ordinary Personology.” In Daniel Gilbert, Susan T. Fiske, and Gardner Lindzey (eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology (Volume 2, 4th edition, pp. 89–150). Boston: McGraw HillGoogle Scholar
Gilliland, Stephen W., and Schmitt, Neal. 1993. “Information Redundancy and Decision Behavior: a Process Tracing Investigation.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 54(2): 157–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Daniel G., and Gigerenzer, Gerd. 1999. “The Recognition Heuristic: How Ignorance Makes Us Smart.” In Gerd Gigerenzer, Peter M. Todd, and the ABC Research Group (eds.), Simple Heuristics that Make Us Smart (pp. 37–58). New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Graber, Doris A. 1984. Processing the News: How People Tame the Information Tide. New York:LongmanGoogle Scholar
Green, Donald P., and Shapiro, Ian. 1994. Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory: A Critique of Applications in Political Science.New Haven, CT:Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
Guterbock, Thomas M. 1980. “Social Class and Voting Choices in Middletown.” Social Forces 58(June): 1044–1056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamill, Ruth,. 1986. “Cognitive consequences of political sophistication.” In Richard R. Lau and David O. Sears (eds.), Political Cognition: The 19th Annual Carnegie Symposium on Congnition (pp. 69–93) Hillsdale, NJ: ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
Hamill, Ruth, Lodge, Milton, and Blake, Fredrick. 1985. “The Breadth, Depth, and Utility of Class, Partisan, and Ideological Schemata.” American Journal of Political Science 29(August): 850–870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hastie, Reid. 1986. “A Primer of Information Processing Theory for the Political Scientist.” In Richard R. Lau and David O. Sears (eds.), Political Cognition: The 19th Annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition (pp. 11–39). Hillsdale, NJ: ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
Hastie, Reid. 2001. “Problems for Judgment and Decision Making.” Annual Rev-iew of Psychology (Volume 52, pp. 653–683). Stanford, CA: Annual ReviewsCrossRef
Hastie, Reid, and Robyn, M. Dawes. 2001. Rational Choice in an Uncertain World. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Hastie, Reid, and Kumar, Purohit A.. 1979. “Person Memory: Personality Traits as Organizing Principles in Memory for Behavior.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37(January): 25–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hastie, Reid, Ostrom, Thomas M., Ebbesen, Ebbe B., Wyer, Jr., Robert S., Hamilton, David L., and Carlston, Donal E. (eds.). 1980. Person Memory: The Cognitive Basis of Social Perception. Hillsdale, NJ:ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
Hastie, Reid, and Park, Bernadette. 1986. “The Relationship Between Memory and Judgment Depends on Whether the Task Is Memory-based or On-line.”Psychological Review 93(2): 258–268CrossRef
Hastie, Reid, and Pennington, Nancy. 1988. “Notes on the Distinction Between Memory-based and On-line Judgments.” In John N. Bassili (ed.), On-line Cognition in Person Perception (pp. 1–19). Hillsdale, NJ: ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
Heider, Fritz. 1958. The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: WileyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hempel, Carl G. 1965. Aspects of Scientific Explanations. New York: Free PressGoogle Scholar
Henshel, Richard L. 1980. “The Purposes of Laboratory Experimentation and the Virtues of Deliberate Artificiality.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 16(September): 466–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herek, Gregory M., Janis, Irving L., and Huth, Paul. 1987. “Decision Making During International Crises.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 31(June): 203–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herstein, John A. 1981. “Keeping the Voter's Limits in Mind: A Cognitive Process Analysis of Decision Making in Voting.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 40(May): 843–861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, E. Tory, and King, G.. 1981. “Accessibility of Social Constructs: Information Processing Consequences of Individual and Contextual Variability.” In Nancy Cantor and John F. Kihlstrom (eds.), Personality, Cognition, and Social Interaction (pp. 69–122). Hillsdale, NJ: ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
Hinich, Melvin J., and Munger, Michael C.. 1994. Ideology and the Theory of Political Choice. Ann Arbor:University of Michigan PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinich, Melvin J., and Munger, Michael C.. 1997. Analytical Politics. New York:Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogarth, Robin M. 1975. “Cognitive Processes and the Assessment of Subjective Probability Distributions.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 70(June): 271–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogarth, Robin M. 1987. Judgment and Choice (2nd edition). New York: Wiley
Holbrook, Thomas M. 1996. “Reading the Political Tea Leaves: A Forecasting Model of Contemporary Presidential Elections.” American Politics Quarterly 24(October): 506–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Li-Ning. 2000. “Examining Candidate Information Search Processes: The Impact of Processing Goals and Sophistication.” Journal of Communication 50(Winter): 93–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Li-Ning, and Vincent Price. 2001. “Motivations, Goals, Information Search, and Memory about Political Candidates.”Political Psychology 22: 665–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1968. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C. 1987. The Politics of Congressional Elections (2nd edition). Boston: Little, BrownGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C., and Kernell, Samuel. 1981. Strategy and Choice in Congressional Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
Jacoby, Jacob, Kohn, Carol, and Speller, Donald E.. 1974. “Brand Choice Behavior as a Function of Information Load.” Journal of Marketing Research 11(February): 63–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacoby, J., Speller, Donald E., and Berning, C. Kohn. 1974. “Brand Choice Behavior as a Function of Information Load: Replication and Extension.” Journal of Consumer Research 1(February): 33–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacoby, Jacob, Chestnut, R. W., Weigl, K. C., and Fischer, W.. 1976. “Pre-Purchasing Information Acquisition: Description of a Process Methodology, Research Paradigm, and Pilot Investigation.” Advances in Consumer Research 5(6): 546–554Google Scholar
Jacoby, Jacob, Jaccard, James, Kuss, Alfred, Troutman, Tracy, and Mazursky, David. 1987. “New Directions in Behavioral Process Research: Implications for Social Psychology.”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 23(March): 146–175CrossRef
Janis, Irvine L. 1972. Victims of Groupthink.Boston: Houghton MifflinGoogle Scholar
Janis, Irvine L., and Mann, Leon. 1977. Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment. New York: The Free PressGoogle Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 1976. Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Eric J., and Russo, J. E.. 1984. “Product Familiarity and Learning New Information.” Journal of Consumer Research 11(August): 542–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Michael D. 1984. “Consumer Choice Strategies for Comparing Noncomparable Alternatives.” Journal of Consumer Research 11(December): 741–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Michael D. 1986. “Modeling Choice Strategies for Noncomparable Alternatives.” Marketing Sciences 5(Winter): 37–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Mitzi M. S. 1993. “Thinking about Strategies During, Before, and After Making a Decision.” Psychology and Aging 8(3): 231–241CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, Bryan D. 1994. Reconceiving Decision-Making in Democratic Politics: Attention, Choice, and Public Policy. Chicago:University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Jones, Bryan D. 1999. “Bounded Rationality.” Annual Review of Political Science 2: 297–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Just, Marion R., Crigler, Ann N., Alger, Dean E., Cook, Timothy E., Kern, Montaque, and West, Darrell M.. 1996. Crosstalk: Citizens, Candidates, and the Media in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago:University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel. 1994. “New Challenges to the Rationality Assumption.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 15(1): 18–36
Kahneman, Daniel, and Tversky, Amos. 1972. “Subjective Probability: A Judgment of Representativeness.” Cognitive Psychology 3(July): 430–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, and Tversky, Amos. 1973. “On the Psychology of Prediction.” Psychological Review 80(March): 237–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, and Tversky, Amos. 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk.” Econometrica 47(May): 263–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, and Tversky, Amos. 1982. “The Psychology of Preferences.” Scientific American 246(February): 160–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, and Tversky, Amos. 1984. “Choices, Values, and Frames.” American Psychologist 39(April): 341–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, Slovic, Paul, and Tversky, Amos. 1982. Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. New York:Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, Kevin L., and Staelin, Richard. 1987. “Effects of Quality and Quantity of Information on Decision Effectiveness.” Journal of Consumer Research 14(September): 200–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, L. R., and Ho, J. L.. 1988. “Decision Problem Structuring: Generating Options.” IEEE Transactions on System, Man, and Cybernetics 18: 715–728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, Stanley Jr. 1983. Interpreting Elections. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, Stanley Jr., and Mirer, Thad W.. 1974. “The Simple Act of Voting.” American Political Science Review 68(June): 572–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerstholt, Jose H. 1992. “Information Search and Choice Accuracy as a Function of Task Complexity and Task Structure.” Acta Psychologica 80: 185–197Google Scholar
Kessel, John H. 1972. “Comment: The Issues in Issue Voting.” American Political Science Review 66(June): 459–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Key, V. O., Jr. 1966. The Responsible Electorate. Cambridge, MA: Belknap PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinder, Donald R. 1998. “Communication and Opinion.” Annual Review of Political Science (Volume 1, pp. 167–197). Stanford, CA: Annual ReviewsCrossRef
Kinder, Donald R., Adams, G. S., and Gronke, Paul W.. 1989. “Economics and Politics in the 1984 American Presidential Election.” American Journal of Political Science 33(May): 491–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinder, Donald R., and Kiewiet, D. Roderick. 1979. “Economic Discontent and Political Behavior: The Role of Personal Grievances and Collective Economic Judgments in Congressional Voting.” American Journal of Political Science 23(May): 495–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinder, Donald R., and Palfrey, Thomas (eds.). 1993. Experimental Foundations of Political Science. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinder, Donald R., and Sanders, Lynn. 1990. “Mimicking Political Debate with Survey Questions: The Case of White Opinion on Affirmative Action for Blacks.” Social Cognition 8(1): 73–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkpatrick, Samuel A. (ed.). 1976. American Electoral Behavior: Change and Stability. Beverly Hills, CA:SageGoogle Scholar
Kirkpatrick, Samuel A., Lyons, William, and Fitzgerald, Michael R.. 1976. “Candidates, Parties, and Issues in the American Electorate: Two Decades of Change.” In Samuel A. Kirkpatrick (ed.), American Electoral Behavior: Change and Stability. Beverly Hills, CA:SageGoogle Scholar
Klayman, J. 1985. “Children's Decision Strategies and Their Adaptation to Task Characteristics.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 35(April): 179–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleinmuntz, Don N., and Schkade, David A. 1993. “Information Displays and Decision Processes.” Psychological Science 4(July): 221–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krosnick, Jon. A. 1990. “Government Policy and Citizen Passion: A Study of Issue Publics in Contemporary America.” Political Behavior 12(March): 59–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuklinski, James H., and Hurley, Norman L.. 1994. “On Hearing and Interpreting Political Messages: A Cautionary Tale of Citizen Cue Taking.”Journal of Politics 56(August): 729–751CrossRef
Kuklinski, James H., and Quirk, Paul J.. 2001. “Conceptual Foundations of Citizen Competence.” Political Behavior 23(September): 285–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuklinski, James H., Luskin, Robert C., and Bolland, James. 1991. “Where is the Schema? Going Beyond the ‘S’ Word in Political Psychology.” American Political Science Review 85(December): 1341–1356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunda, Z. 1987. “Motivated Inference: Self-Serving Generation and Evaluation of Causal Theories.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53(4): 636–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunda, Z. 1990. “The Case for Motivated Reasoning.” Psychological Bulletin 1083: 480–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakatos, Imre. 1970. “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes.” In Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (pp. 91–196). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, Robert E. 1962. Political Ideology: Why the American Common Man Believes as He Does. New York:The Free PressGoogle Scholar
Langley, P., Simon, Herbert A., Bradshaw, G. L., and Zytkow, J. M.. 1987. Scientific Discovery (Volume 1). Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Lau, Richard R. 1982. “Negativity in Political Perception.” Political Behavior 4(December): 353–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, Richard R. 1986. “Political Schemata, Candidate Evaluations, and Voting Behavior.” In R. R. Lau and D. O. Sears (eds.), Political Cognition (pp. 95–126). Hillsdale, NJ: ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
Lau, Richard R. 1989. “Construct Accessibility and Electoral Choice.” Political Behavior 11(March): 5–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, Richard R. 1992. Searchable Information during an Election Campaign. Unpublished manuscript, Rutgers UniversityGoogle Scholar
Lau, Richard R. 1995. “Information Search During an Election Campaign: Introducing a Process Tracing Methodology for Political Scientists.” In M. Lodge and K. McGraw (eds.), Political Judgment: Structure and Process (pp. 179–205). Ann Arbor:University of Michigan PressGoogle Scholar
Lau, Richard R. 2003. “Models of Decision Making.” In David O. Sears, Leonie Huddy, and Robert Jervis (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology (pp. 19–59). New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Lau, Richard R., and Erber, Ralph. 1985. “An Information Processing Perspective on Political Sophistication.” In Sidney Kraus and Richard Perloff (eds.), Mass Media and Political Thought (pp. 17–39). Beverly Hills, CA: SageGoogle Scholar
Lau, Richard R., Patel, Parina, Fahmy, Dalia F., and Kaufman, Robert R.. 2005. “Correct Voting Across 30 Democracies.” Paper presented at the 2005 annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, April 7–10
Lau, Richard R., and Redlawsk, David P.. 1992. “How Voters Decide: A Process Tracing Study of Decision Making During Political Campaigns.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, IL
Lau, Richard R., and Redlawsk, David P.. 1997. “Voting Correctly.” American Political Science Review 91(September): 585–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, Richard R., and Redlawsk, David P.. 2001a. “An Experimental Study of Information Search, Memory, and Decision Making During a Political Campaign.” In J. Kuklinski (ed.), Political Psychology and Public Opinion (pp. 136–159). New York: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Lau, Richard R., and Redlawsk, David P.. 2001b. “Advantages and Disadvantages of Cognitive Heuristics in Political Decision Making.” American Journal of Political Science 45(October): 951–971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, Richard R., and Sears, David O.. 1986. “Social Cognition and Political Cognition.” In Richard R. Lau and David O. Sears (eds.), Political Cognition: The 19th Annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition (pp. 347–366). Hillsdale, NJ:ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
Lau, Richard R., Sears, David O., and Centers, Richard. 1979. “The ‘Positivity Bias’ in Evaluations of Public Figures: Evidence Against Instrument Artifacts.” Public Opinion Quarterly 43(Fall): 347–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazarsfeld, Paul F., Berelson, Bernard R., and Gaudet, Hazel. 1944. The People's Choice. New York: Columbia University PressGoogle Scholar
Levy, Jack S. 2003. “Political Psychology and Foreign Policy.” In David O. Sears, Leonie Huddy, and Robert Jervis (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology (pp. 253–284). New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Lewin, Kurt. 1939. “Field Theory and Experiment in Social Psychology: Concepts and Methods.” American Journal of Sociology 44(3): 868–896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewin, Kurt. 1946. “Action Research and Minority Problems.” Journal of Social Issues 2(1): 34–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewin, Kurt. 1951. Field Theory in Social Science. New York: Harper & BrothersGoogle Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Rice, Tom W.. 1992. Forecasting Elections. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly PressGoogle Scholar
Lichtenstein, Sarah, and Slovic, Paul. 1971. “Reversals of Preference between Bids and Choices in Gambling Decisions.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 89(July): 46–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lichtenstein, Meryl, and Srull, Thomas K.. 1987. “Processing Objectives as a Determinant of the Relationship Between Recall and Judgment.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 23(March): 93–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindberg, Eric, Garling, Tommy, and Montgomery, Henry. 1989. “Differential Predictability of Preferences and Choices.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 2(October–December): 205–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindblom, Charles E. 1965. The Intelligence of Democracy. New York: Free PressGoogle Scholar
Lippmann, Walter. 1955. Essays in the Public Philosophy. Boston: Little, BrownGoogle Scholar
Lodge, Milton. 1995. “Toward a Procedural Model of Candidate Evaluation.” In M. Lodge and K. McGraw (eds.), Political Information Processing (pp. 111–139). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan PressGoogle Scholar
Lodge, Milton, and Hamill, Ruth. 1986. “A Partisan Schema for Political Information Processing.” American Political Science Review 80(June): 505–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, Milton, and McGraw, Kathleen M. (eds.). 1995. Political Judgment: Structure and Process. Ann Arbor:University of Michigan PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, Milton, McGraw, Kathleen M., and Stroh, Patrick. 1989. “An Impression Driven Model of Candidate Evaluation.” American Political Science Review 83(June): 399–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, Milton, and Stroh, Patrick. 1993. “Inside the Mental Voting Booth.” In S. Iyenger and R. McGuire (eds.), Political Psychology (pp. 225–263). Durham, NC: Duke University PressGoogle Scholar
Lodge, Milton, Stroh, Patrick, and Wahlke, John. 1990. “Black-box Models of Candidate Evaluation.”Political Behavior 12(March): 5–18CrossRef
Lodge, Milton, Steenbergen, Marco R., and Brau, Shawn. 1995. “The Responsive Voter: Campaign Information and the Dynamics of Candidate Evaluation.” American Political Science Review 89(June): 309–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, Milton, and Taber, Charles. 2000. “Three Steps Toward a Theory of Motivated Political Reasoning.” In Arthur Lupia, Mathew D. McCubbins, and Samuel L. Popkin (eds.), Elements of Reason (pp. 183–213). Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Luce, R. Duncan, and Raiffa, Howard. 1957. Games and Decisions: Introduction and Critical Survey. New York:WileyGoogle Scholar
Lodge, Milton, Charles Taber, and Christopher Weber, . Forthcoming. “First Steps Towards a Dual-Process Accessibility Model of Political Beliefs, Attitudes, and Behavior.” In David P. Redlawsk (ed.), Feeling Politics: Emotion in Political Information Processing.New York:Palgrave-Macmillan
Lupia, Arthur. 1992. “Busy Voters, Agenda Control, and the Power of Information.” American Political Science Review 86(June): 390–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupia, Arthur. 1994. “Shortcuts Versus Encyclopedias: Information and Voting Behavior in California Insurance Reform Elections.” American Political Science Review 88(March): 63–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupia, Arthur, and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1998. The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Really Need to Know? New York:Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Lupia, Arthur, McCubbins, Mathew D., and Popkin, Samuel L.. 2000. “Beyond Rationality: Reason and the Study of Politics.” In Arthur Lupia, Mathew D. McCubbins, and Samuel L. Popkin (eds.), Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice, and the Bounds of Rationality (pp. 1–20). New York:Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynd, Robert S., and Lynd, Helen Merrell. 1929. Middletown. New York: Harcourt, Brace & WorldGoogle Scholar
Lynd, Robert S., and Lynd, Helen Merrell. 1937. Middletown in Transition. New York: Harcourt, Brace & WorldGoogle Scholar
Macaluso, Theodore F. 1975. “Candidate Image: Personal Attribute and Issue Content.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, Nashville, TN
MacDonald, Paul K. 2003. “Useful Fiction or Miracle Maker: The Competing Epistemological Foundations of Rational Choice Theory.” American Political Science Review 97 (November): 551–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackelprang, A. J., Grofman, Bernard, and Keith, Thomas N.. 1976. “Electoral Change and Stability: Some New Perspectives.” In Samuel A. Kirkpatrick (ed.), American Electoral Behavior: Change and Stability. Beverly Hills, CA:SageGoogle Scholar
Malhotra, Naresh K. 1982. “Information Load and Consumer Decision Making.” Journal of Consumer Research 8(March): 419–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane J. 1983. Beyond Adversary Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
March, James G. 1978. “Bounded Rationality, Ambiguity, and the Engineering of Choice.” Bell Journal of Economics 9(Autumn): 578–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, James G. 1988. Decisions and Organizations. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
March, James G. 1994. A Primer on Decision Making. New York: Free PressGoogle Scholar
March, James G., and Olson, Johan P.. 1989. Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York:Free PressGoogle Scholar
March, James G., and Simon, Herbert A.. 1958. Organizations. New York: WileyGoogle Scholar
Marcus, George E. 1988. “The Structure of Emotional Response: 1984 Presidential Candidates.” American Political Science Review 82(September): 737–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcus, George E., and MacKuen, Michael B.. 1993. “Anxiety, Enthusiasm, and the Vote: The Emotional Underpinnings of Learning and Involvement During Presidential Campaigns.” American Political Science Review 87(September): 672–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcus, George E., W. Russell Neuman, and Michael MacKuen, . 2000. Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment.Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Markus, Gregory B., and Converse, Philip E.. 1979. “A Dynamic Simultaneous Equation Model of Electoral Choice.” American Political Science Review 73(December): 1055–1070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClosky, Herbert. 1964. “Consensus and Ideology in American Politics.” American Political Science Review 58(June): 361–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, Rose. 2002. “Experimental Methods in Political Science.” Annual Review of Political Science 5(1): 31–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGinniss, Joe. 1969. The Selling of the President. New York: Trident PressGoogle Scholar
McGraw, Kathleen M. 2000. “Contributions of the Cognitive Approach to Political Psychology.” Political Psychology 21(December): 805–832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGraw, Kathleen M., Fischle, Mark, and Stenner, Karen. 2000. “What Politicians ‘Know’ Depends on How They are Asked.” Unpublished manuscript
McGraw, Kathleen M., Lodge, Milton, and Stroh, Patrick. 1990. “On-line Processing in Candidate Evaluation: The Effects of Issue Order, Issue Salience, and Sophistication.” Political Behavior 12(March): 41–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGraw, Kathleen M., and Pinney, Neil. 1990. “The Effects of General and Domain-specific Expertise on Political Memory and Judgment.” Social Cognition 8(Spring): 9–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKelvey, Richard D., and Ordeshook, Peter C.. 1986. “Information, Electoral Equilibria, and the Democratic Ideal.” Journal of Politics 48(November): 909–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPhee, William. 1961. “Note on a Campaign Simulator.” Public Opinion Quarterly 25(Summer): 184–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meehl, Paul E, . 1954. Clinical versus Statistical Predictions: A Theoretical Analysis and Review of the Evidence.Minneapolis:University of Minnesota PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meehl, Paul E. 1977. “The Selfish Voter and the Thrown-Away Vote Argument.”American Political Science Review 71(March): 11–30CrossRef
Mellers, Barbara A., Schwartz, Alan, and Cooke, Alan. 1998. “Judgment and Decision Making.” Annual Review of Psychology 49: 447–477CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milech, Dan, and Finucane, Melissa. 1998. “Decision Support and Behavioral Decision Theory.” In Kim Kirsner and Craig Speelman (eds.), Implicit and Explicit Mental Processes (pp. 291–307). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
Miller, Arthur H., Wattenberg, Martin P., and Malanchuk, Oksana. 1986. “Schematic Assessments of Presidential Candidates.” American Political Science Review 80(June): 521–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, George A. 1956. “The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information.” Psychological Review 63(1): 81–97CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, Warren E. 1976. “The Challenges of Electoral Research.” In Samuel A. Kirkpatrick (ed.), American Electoral Behavior: Change and Stability. Beverly Hills, CA:SageGoogle Scholar
Miller, Warren E., and Shanks, J. Merrill. 1996. The New American Voter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Mills, Charles W. 1971. The Power Elite. London: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Mintz, Alex. 1997. “The Decison to Attack Iraq: A Noncompensatory Theory of Decisionmaking.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 37(December): 595–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mintz, Alex, and Geva, Nehemia. 1997. “The Poliheuristic Theory of Foreign Policy Decisionmaking.” In Nehemia Geva and Alex Mintz (eds.), Decisionmaking on War and Peace: The Cognitive-Rational Debate (pp. 81–101). Boulder, CO:Lynne Rienner PublishersGoogle Scholar
Mintz, Alex, Geva, Nehemia, Redd, Steven B., and Carnes, Amy. 1997. “The Effects of Dynamic and Static Choice Sets on Decision Strategy.” American Political Science Review 91(September): 553–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondak, Jeffrey J. 1993. “Public Opinion and Heuristic Processing of Source Cues.”Political Behavior 15(June): 167–192CrossRef
Morrell, Holly E. R., Gaitan, Santino, and Wixted, John T.. “On the Nature of the Decision Axis in Signal-Detection-Based Models of Recognition Memory.”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition. 28(November): 1095–1110.
Mueller, John E. 1970. “Presidential Popularity from Truman to Johnson.”American Political Science Review 64(March): 18–34CrossRef
Mueller, John. 1992. “Democracy and Ralph's Pretty Good Grocery: Elections, Equality, and Minimal Human Beings.”American Journal of Political Science 36(November): 983–1003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mutz, Diana C. 1997. “Mechanisms of Momentum: Does Thinking Make it So?Journal of Politics 59(February): 104–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, Stephen P. 2005. Voting the Agenda: Candidates, Elections and Ballot Propositions. Princeton, NJ:Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, Stephen P., Pantoja, Adrian, and Segura, Gary M.. 2002. “Ich bin ein Latino: Sophistication, Symbolism, Heuristics and Latino Preferences in the 2000 Presidential Election.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, MA, August 29–September 1
Nie, Norman H., and Kristi, Andersen. 1974. “Mass Belief Systems Revisited: Political Change and Attitude Structure.”Journal of Politics 36(August): 541–591CrossRef
Nie, Norman H., Verba, Sidney, and Petrocik, John R.. 1976. The Changing American Voter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Niemi, Richard G., and Bartels, Larry M.. 1985. “New Measures of Issue Salience: An Evaluation.” The Journal of Politics 47(November): 1212–1220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nisbett, Richard E., and Ross, Lee. 1980. Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-HallGoogle Scholar
Nisbett, Richard E., and Wilson, Timothy D.. 1977. “Telling More Than We Can Know: Verbal Reports on Mental Processes.” Psychological Review 84(March): 231–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norman, Donald A. 1976. Memory and Attention: An Introduction to Human Information Processing. New York:WileyGoogle Scholar
Norman, Donald A. 1982. Learning and Memory. San Francisco: FreemanGoogle Scholar
Norusis, Marija J. 1994. SPSS for Windows Advanced Statistics Release 6. Chicago: SPSSGoogle Scholar
Olshavsky, Richard W. 1979. “Task Complexity and Contingent Processing in Decision Making: A Replication and Extension.” Organization Behavior and Human Performance 24(December): 300–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, Benjamin I., and Robert Y. Shapiro. 1992. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans' Policy Preferences.Chicago:University of Chicago PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, Thomas E., 1980. The Mass Media Election: How Americans Choose Their President.New York:PraegerGoogle Scholar
Payne, John W. 1976. “Task Complexity and Contingent Processing in Decision Making: An Information Search and Protocol Analysis.” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 16(August): 366–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, John. W. 1980. “Information Processing Theory: Some Concepts and Methods Applied to Decision Research.” In T. S. Wallsten (ed.), Cognitive Processes in Choice and Decision Behavior. Hillsdale, NJ:ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
Payne, John W., Bettman, James R., and Johnson, Eric J.. 1988. “Adaptive Strategy Selection in Decision Making.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 14(July): 534–552Google Scholar
Payne, John W., Bettman, James R., and Johnson, Eric J.. 1992. “Behavioral Decision Research: A Constructive Processing Perspective.” Annual Review of Psychology 43: 87–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, John W., Bettman, James R., and Johnson, Eric J.. 1993. The Adaptive Decision Maker.New York: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, John W., and Braunstein, Myron L.. 1978. “Risky Choice: An Examination of Information Acquisition Behavior.” Memory & Cognition 6(September): 554–561CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Payne, John W., Braunstein, Myron L., and Carroll, John S.. 1978. “Exploring Predecisional Behavior: An Alternative Approach to Decision Research.” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 22(August): 17–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perlmutter, Marvon. 1983. “Learning and Memory Through Adulthood.” In Matilda White Riley, Beth B. Hess, and Kathleen Bond (eds.), Aging in Society: Selected Reviews of Recent Research (pp. 219–241). Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
Pitz, Gordon, and Sachs, Natalie. 1984. “Judgment and Decision: Theory and Application.” Annual Review of Psychology 35: 139–163CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plutzer, Eric, and Zipp, John F.. 1996. “Identity Politics, Partisanship, and Voting for Women Candidates.” Public Opinion Quarterly 60(Spring): 30–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pomper, Gerald M. 1972. “From Confusion to Clarity: Issues and American Voters, 1956–1968.” American Political Science Review 66(June): 415–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pomper, Gerald M. 1976. “Impacts on the Political System.” In Kirkpatrick, Samuel A. (ed.), American Electoral Behavior: Change and Stability.Beverly Hills, CA:SageGoogle Scholar
Pomper, Gerald M. 2001. The Election of 2000.New York: Chatham HouseGoogle Scholar
Pool, Ithiel de Sola, and Robert Abelson. 1961. “The Simulmatics Project.” The Public Opinion Quarterly 25(Summer):167–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popkin, Samuel L. 1991 . The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns.Chicago:University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Popper, Karl. 1959. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Basic BooksGoogle Scholar
Prothro, James W., and Grigg, Charles W.. 1960. “Fundamental Principles of Democracy: Bases of Agreement and Disagreement.” Journal of Politics 22(May): 276–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purkitt, Helen E., and Dyson, James W.. 1988. “An Experimental Study of Cognitive Processes and Information in Political Problem Solving.” Acta Psychologica 68(September): 329–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Hillary. 1982. “Three Kinds of Scientific Realism.” Philosophical Quarterly 32(April): 195–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quadrel, Marilyn J., Baruch Fischfoff, and William David, . 1993. “Adolescent (In)vulnerability.” American Psychologist 48(February): 102–116Google Scholar
Rabinowitz, George, and Stuart Elaine MacDonald. 1989. “A Directional Theory of Issue Voting.” American Political Science Review 83(March): 93–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahn, Wendy M. 1993. “The Role of Partisan Stereotypes in Information Processing about Political Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science 37(May): 472–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahn, Wendy M., Aldrich, John H., and Borgida, Eugene. 1994. “Individual and Contextual Variations in Political Candidate Appraisal.” American Political Science Review 88(March): 193–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahn, Wendy M., Aldrich, John H., Borgida, Eugene, and Sullivan, John L.. 1990. “A Social-Cognitive Model of Candidate Appraisal.” In John A. Ferejohn and James H. Kuklinski (eds.), Information and Democratic Processes.Chicago: University of Illinois PressGoogle Scholar
Rahn, Wendy M., Krosnick, Jon A., and Breuning, Marijke. 1994. “Rationalization and Derivation Processes in Survey Studies of Political Candidate Evaluation.” American Journal of Political Science 38(August): 582–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raiffa, Howard. 1968. Decision Analysis: Introductory Lectures on Choices Under Uncertainty. Reading, MA:Addison-WesleyGoogle Scholar
Reder, Lynn M., and Anderson, John R.. 1980. “A Partial Resolution of the Paradox of Interference: The Role of Integrating Knowledge.” Cognitive Psychology 12(October): 447–472CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Redlawsk, David P. 1992. “Using Hypermedia to Develop a Political Science Simulation.” Paper presented at the 25th annual meeting of the Association of Small Computer Users in Education (ASCUE), Myrtle Beach, SC
Redlawsk, David P. 1995a. “Conducting Political Science Research Using Multimedia.” Paper prepared for the 28th annual meeting of the Association of Small Computer Users in Education (ASCUE), Myrtle Beach, SC
Redlawsk, David P. 1995b. “How voters use campaign information.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago
Redlawsk, David P. 2001a. “You Must Remember This: A Test of the On-line Voting Model.” Journal of Politics 63(February): 29–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redlawsk, David P. 2001b. “Implications of Motivated Reasoning for Voter Information Processing.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, and at the annual meeting of the International Society for Political Psychology, Cuernavaca, Mexico
Redlawsk, David P. 2002. “Hot Cognition or Cool Consideration? Testing the Effects of Motivated Reasoning on Political Decision Making.” Journal of Politics 64(November): 1021–1044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redlawsk, David P. 2004. “What Voters Do: Information Search During Election Campaigns.”Political Psychology 25(4): 595–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redlawsk, David P., and Lau, Richard R.. 1995. “The Miserly Voter: Heuristics and Rational Voting Behavior.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago
Redlawsk, David P., and Lau, Richard R.. 2003. “Do Voters Want Candidates They Like of Candidates They Agree With? Affect vs. Cognition in Voter Decision Making.” Paper presented at the Shambaugh Conference on Affect and Cognition in Political Action, University of Iowa, March 6–9, and the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April 3–6
Reyes, R. M., Thompson, W. C., and Bower., Gordon H. 1980. “Judgmental Biases Resulting from Differing Availabilities of Arguments.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39(July): 2–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riggle, Ellen D. B., Mitzi, M. S. Johnson, and Hickey, Scot. 1996. “Information Monitoring of Strategic Decision Making: a Process Tracing Demonstration.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago
Riggle, Ellen D., Ottati, Victor, Wyer, Robert S., Kuklinski, James, and Schwartz, Norbert. 1992. “Bases of Political Judgments: The Role of Stereotypic and Nonstereotypic Information.” Political Behavior 14(March): 67–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riker, William H., and Ordeshook, Peter C.. 1968. “A Theory of the Calculus of Voting.” American Political Science Review 62(March): 25–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riker, William H., and Ordeshook, Peter. 1973. An Introduction to Positive Political Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-HallGoogle Scholar
Rosch, Ellen. 1978. “Principles of Categorization.” In Ellen Rosch and B. B. Lloyd (eds.), Cognition and Categorization (pp. 28–50). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, Shawn W., Kahn, Shulamit, and Tran, Thuy. 1991. “Creating a Political Image: Shaping Appearance and Manipulating the Vote.” Political Behavior 13(December): 345–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenstone, Steven J. 1983. Forecasting Presidential Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossi, Peter H. 1959. “Four Landmarks in Voting Research.” In Eugene Burdick and Arthur J Brodbeck (eds.), American Voting Behavior. New York: Free PressGoogle Scholar
Rothkopf, Ernst Z., Dashen, Monica, and Teft, Kim. “Aggregation in Memory of Episodic Influences on Rule-Guided Decisions.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 28(September): 983–998
Rubenstein, Albert H. 1998. Modeling Bounded Rationality. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Russo, J. Edward. 1977. “The Value of Unit Price Information.” Journal of Marketing Research 14(May): 193–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russo, J. Edward, and Dosher, Barbara A.. 1983. “Strategies for Multiattribute Binary Choice.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 17(September): 676–696Google Scholar
Sargent, T. J. 1993. Bounded Rationality in Macroeconomics. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
Savage, Leonard J. 1954. The Foundations of Statistics. New York: WileyGoogle Scholar
Schattschneider, Elmer E. 1960. The Semi-Sovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America.New York:HoltGoogle Scholar
Sears, David O, . 1975. “Political Socialization.” In Fred I. Greenstein and Nelson W. Polsby (eds.), Handbook of Political Science (Vol. 2, pp. 93–127). Menlo Park, CA:Addison-WesleyGoogle Scholar
Sears, David O. 1986. “College Sophomores in the Laboratory: Influences of a Narrow Database on Social Psychology's View of Human Nature.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51: 515–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sears, David O., and , Carolyn Funk. 1991. “The Role of Self-Interest in Social and Political Attitudes.” In L. Berkowitz (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 24, pp. 1–91). New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Sears, David O., Lau, Richard R., Tyler, Tom R., and Allen, Jr., Harris M. 1980. “Self-Interest versus Symbolic Politics in Policy Attitudes and Presidential Voting.” American Political Science Review 74(September): 670–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaffer, William R. 1972. Computer Simulations of Voting Behavior. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Shanteau, J. 1988. “Psychological Characteristics and Strategies of Expert Decision Makers.” Acta Psychological 68(2): 203–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanteau, J. 1992. “How Much Information Does an Expert Use? Is It Relevant?”Acta Psychologica 81(1): 75–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shugan, Steven M. 1980. “The Cost of Thinking.” Journal of Consumer Research 7(September): 99–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, Herbert A. 1947. Administrative Behavior. New York: MacmillanGoogle Scholar
Simon, Herbert. 1955. “A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 69(February): 99–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, Herbert. 1956. “Rational Choice and the Structure of the Environment.”American Psychologist 63(February): 129–138
Simon, Herbert A. 1957. Models of Man: Social and Rational. New York:WileyGoogle Scholar
Simon, Herbert A. 1979. “Information Processing Models of Cognition.” Annual Review of Psychology 30: 363–396CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simon, Herbert A. 1985. “Human Nature in Politics: The Dialogue of Psychology with Political Science.” American Political Science Review 79(June): 293–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, Herbert A. 1995. “Rationality in Political Behavior.” Political Psychology 16(March): 45–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slovic, Paul, Fischhoff, Baruch, and Lichtenstein, Sara. 1977. “Behavioral Decision Theory.” Annual Review of Psychology 28: 1–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slovic, Paul, Fischhoff, Baruch, and Lichtenstein, Sara. 1982. “Response Mode, Framing, and Information Processing Effects in Risk Assessment.” In Robin Hogarth (ed.), New Directions for Methodology of Social and Behavioral Science: The Framing of Questions and the Consistency of Response (pp. 21–36). San Francisco:Jossey-BassGoogle Scholar
Slovic, Paul, and Lichtenstein, Sara. 1971. “Comparison of Bayesian and Regression Approaches to the Study of Information Processing in Judgment.” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 6(4): 649–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Elliot. 1989. The Unchanging American Voter. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
Smith, Elliott R. 1998. “Mental Representation and Memory.” In Daniel T. Gilbert, Susan T. Fiske, and Gardner Lindzey (eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology (Volume I, 4th edition, pp. 391–445). Boston: McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
Sniderman, Paul M. 1993. “The New Look in Public Opinion Research.” In Ada W. Finifter (ed.), Political Science: The State of the Discipline II (pp. 219–245). Washington, DC:American Political Science AssociationGoogle Scholar
Sniderman, Paul M., Brody, Richard A., and Tetlock, Philip E.. 1991. Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology. New York:Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sniderman, Paul M., Hagen, Michael G., Tetlock, Philip E., and Brady, Henry E.. 1986. “Reasoning Chains: Causal Models of Policy Reasoning in Mass Publics.” British Journal of Political Science 16(July): 405–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squire, Pevrill. 1992. “Challenger Quality and Voting Behavior in U.S. Senate Elections.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 17(May): 247–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srull, Thomas K. 1981. “Person Memory: Some Tests of Associative Storage and Retrieval Models.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 7(November): 440–463Google Scholar
Staelin, Richard, and Payne, John W.. 1976. “Studies of the Information-Seeking Behavior of Consumers.” In J. S. Carroll and J. W. Payne (eds.), Cognition and Social Behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
Steenbergen, Marco. 2001. “The Reverend Bayes Meets John Q. Public: Patterns of Political Belief Updating in Citizens.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology, Cuernavaca, Mexico
Steenbergen, Marco, and Lodge, Milton. 1998. “Process Matters: Cognitive Models of Candidate Evaluations.” Paper presented a the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, MA
Stigler, George J. 1961. “The Economics of InformationJournal of Political Economy 69(2): 213–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, Donald E., Campbell, Angus, and Miller, Warren E.. 1958. “Components of Electoral Decision.” American Political Science Review 52(June): 367–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svenson, Ola. 1979. “Process Descriptions of Decision Making.” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 23(February): 86–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taber, Charles S., and Steenbergen, Marco R.. 1995. “Computational Experiments in Electoral Behavior.” In Milton Lodge and Kathleen M. McGraw (eds.), Political Judgment: Structure and Process (pp. 141–178). Ann Arbor:University of Michigan PressGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah., 1990. You Just Don't Understand: Women and Men in Conversation.New York:MorrowGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Shelley E. 1981. “The Interface of Cognitive and Social Psychology.” In John Harvey (ed.), Cognition, Social Behavior, and the Environment (pp. 189–211). Hillsdale, NJ: ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
Tetlock, Philip E. 1993. “Cognitive Structural Analysis of Political Rhetoric: Methodological and Theoretical Issues.” In Shanto Iyengar and William J. McGuire (eds.), Explorations in Political Psychology (pp. 380–405). Durham, NC:Duke University PressGoogle Scholar
Trilling, Richard J. 1976. “Party Image and Electoral Behavior.” In Samuel A. Kirkpatrick (ed.), American Electoral Behavior: Change and Stability. Beverly Hills, CA:SageGoogle Scholar
Tversky, Amos. 1969. “Intransitivity of Preferences.” Psychological Review 76(January): 31–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, Amos. 1972. “Elimination by Aspects: A Theory of Choice.” Psychological Review 79(May): 281–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, Amos, and Kahneman, Daniel. 1973. “Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability.” Cognitive Psychology 5(April): 207–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, Amos, and Kahneman, Daniel. 1974. “Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.” Science 185(4157): 1124–1131CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman. 1981. “The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice.” Science 211(4481): 453–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, Amos, and Kahneman, Daniel. 1986. “Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions.” Journal of Business 59(October): S251–S278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, Amos, and Kahneman, Daniel. 1992. “Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5(October): 297–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, Amos, and Sattath, Shmuel. 1979. “Preference Trees.” Psychological Review 86(September): 542–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, Amos, Sattath, Shmuel, and Slovic, Paul. 1988. “Contingent Weighting in Judgment and Choice.” Psychological Review 95(July): 371–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neuman, John, and Morgenstern, Oscar. 1947. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Vriend, Nicolaas J. 1996. “Rational Behavior and Economic Theory.”Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 29(March): 263–285CrossRef
Wahlke, John C. 1979. “Pre-Behavioralism in Political Science.” American Political Science Review 73(March): 9–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wattenberg, Martin P. 1981. “The Decline of Political Partisanship in the United States: Negativity or Neutrality?American Political Science Review 75(December): 941–950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weir, Blair T. 1975. “The Distortion of Voter Recall.” American Journal of Political Science 19(February): 53–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Daniel C., Weber, Stephen J., Haaland, Gordon A., Mueller, Ronald H., and Craig, Robert E.. 1976. “Voter Decisionmaking in a Primary Election: An Evaluation of Three Models of Choice.”American Journal of Political Science 20(February): 37–49CrossRef
Winneg, Kenneth, and Jomini, Talia. 2004. “The Internet as a Source of Campaign Information: An Analysis of its use in the 2004 Democratic Presidential Primary Campaign.” Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Phoenix, AZ
Winter, S. G. 1975. “Optimization and Evolution in the Theory of the Firm.” In R. H. Day and T. Groves (eds.), Adaptive Economic Models (pp. 73–118). New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Wright, P. 1975. “Consumer Choice Strategies: Simplifying vs. Optimizing.” Journal of Marketing Research 12(February): 60–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyer, Robert S., and Srull, Thomas K.. 1980. “The Processing of Social Stimulus Information: A Conceptual Integration.” In Reid Hastie, Thomas M. Ostrom, Ebbe E. Ebbesen, Robert S. Wyer, Jr., David L. Hamilton, and Donal E. Carlston (eds.), Person Memory: The Cognitive Basis of Social Perception. Hillsdale, NJ:ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
Wyer, Robert S., and Srull, Thomas K.. 1986. “Human Cognition in its Social Context.”Psychological Review 93(July): 322–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyer, Robert S., and Srull, Thomas K.. 1988. “Understanding Social Knowledge: If Only the Data Could Speak for Themselves.” In Daniel Bar-Tal and Arie W. Kruglanski (eds.), The Social Psychology of Knowledge. Cambridge:Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Zajonc, Robert B. 1968. “Attitudinal Effects of Mere Exposure.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 9(January): 1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaller, John R. 1992. The Nature and Origin of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, Manfred. 1989. “The Nervous System in the Context of Information Theory.” In R. F. Schmidt and G. Thews (eds.), Human Physiology (2nd edition, pp. 166–173). Berlin:Springler-VerlagGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Richard R. Lau, Rutgers University, New Jersey, David P. Redlawsk, University of Iowa
  • Book: How Voters Decide
  • Online publication: 05 September 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791048.019
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Richard R. Lau, Rutgers University, New Jersey, David P. Redlawsk, University of Iowa
  • Book: How Voters Decide
  • Online publication: 05 September 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791048.019
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Richard R. Lau, Rutgers University, New Jersey, David P. Redlawsk, University of Iowa
  • Book: How Voters Decide
  • Online publication: 05 September 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791048.019
Available formats
×