Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T08:26:57.191Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Designing a retail investor protection regime

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2010

Niamh Moloney
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science
Get access

Summary

Why intervene in the retail markets? Encouraging the empowered investor, shielding the irrational investor or supporting the trusting investor?

Characterizing investor protection

The EC investor protection regime is ultimately a creature of political compromise and is closely tied to market integration priorities. But it also forms an extensive regulatory regime which demands challenge and contextualization. This chapter uses the EC regime and aspects of UK implementation, in particular, ‘in action’ to examine the nature of retail investor protection regulation. Chapter 1 considered the ‘who’ of EC investor protection; this chapter considers the ‘why’ (section I), ‘why not’ (or the risks of intervention) (section II) and the ‘how’ (section III).

‘Investor protection’ has considerable intuitive appeal and dominates as a regulatory objective internationally. But it remains a controversial justification for intervention. Sharp distinctions arise between characterizations of investor protection as, for example, a threat to entrepreneurialism and efficient capital-raising, as an expression of social virtues and as a moral imperative. The retail investor has been cast as a central figure in contemporary capitalism, forming part of a wider cultural legacy which dates to nineteenth-century globalization. But the retail investor can also be regarded as a disruptive force.

Investor protection has traditionally been concerned with the defensive protection of the vulnerable investor against unscrupulous market participants. Under neo-classical economics regulatory analysis, however, protection is necessary only where market failures, primarily related to information asymmetries, arise.

Type
Chapter
Information
How to Protect Investors
Lessons from the EC and the UK
, pp. 45 - 133
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Weatherill, S., EU Consumer Law and Policy (2nd edn, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2005), p. 85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,International Organization of Securities Commissions, Objectives and Principles of Securities Regulation (IOSCO, 2008), p. 1Google Scholar
Stout, L., ‘The Investor Confidence Game’ (2002–3) 68 Brooklyn Law Review407, 413Google Scholar
Langevoort, D., ‘Re-reading Cady Roberts: The Ideology and Practice of Insider Trading Regulation’ (1999) 99 Columbia Law Review 1319, 1326–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preda, A., ‘The Investor as a Cultural Figure of Global Capitalism’ in Cetina, K. Knorr and Preda, A., The Sociology of Financial Markets (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), p. 141Google ScholarPubMed
Bradley, C., ‘Disorderly Conduct and the Ideology of “Fair and Orderly Markets”’ (2000) 26 Journal of Corporation Law63Google Scholar
Clark, R., ‘The Soundness of Financial Intermediaries’ (1976) 86 Yale Law Journal1, 26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howells, G., ‘The Potential and Limits of Consumer Empowerment by Information’ (2005) 32 Journal of Law and Society349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garten, H., ‘The Consumerization of Financial Regulation’ (1999) 77 Washington University Law Quarterly287Google Scholar
Akerlof, G., ‘The Market for “Lemons”: Qualitative Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism’ (1970) 84 Quarterly Journal of Economics488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, J., Rules and Regulators (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997), p. 141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogus, A., ‘Regulatory Paternalism: When Is It Justified’ in Hopt, K., Wymeersch, E., Kanda, H. and Baum, H. (eds.), Corporate Governance in Context (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), p. 303Google Scholar
Arlen, J., ‘Comment: The Future of Behavioral Economic Analysis of Law’ (1998) 51 Vanderbilt Law Review1765Google Scholar
Camerer, C., Issacharoff, S., Loewenstein, G., O'Donoghue, T. and Rabin, M., ‘Regulation for Conservatives: Behavioral Economics and the Case for Asymmetric Paternalism’ (2002–3) 151 University of Pennsylvania Law Review1211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjamin, J., Financial Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007), p. 18Google Scholar
Condon, M., Making Disclosure: Ideas and Interests in Ontario Securities Regulation (Toronto, Buffalo and London: University of Toronto Press, 1998), p. 231Google Scholar
Easterbrook, F. and Fischel, D., ‘Mandatory Disclosure and the Protection of Investors’ (1984) 70 Virginia Law Review669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romano, R., ‘Empowering Investors: A Market Approach to Securities Regulation’ (1998) 107Yale Law Journal2359Google Scholar
Langevoort, D., ‘Selling Hope. Selling Risk. Some Lessons from Behavioral Economics about Stockbrokers and Sophisticated Investors’ (1996) 84 California Law Review627, 674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruder, D., ‘Balancing Investor Protections with Capital Formation Needs after the SEC Chamber of Commerce Case’ (2005) 26 Pace Law Review39Google Scholar
Easterbrook, F. and Fischel, D., The Economic Structure of Corporate Law (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991), p. 226Google Scholar
Karmel, R., ‘Reconciling Federal and State Interests in Securities Regulation in the US and Europe’ (2003) 28 Brooklyn Journal of International Law495Google Scholar
Stout, L., ‘The Unimportance of Being Efficient: An Economic Analysis of Stock Market Pricing and Securities Regulation’ (1988) 87 Michigan Law Review613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langevoort, D., ‘Taming the Animal Spirits of the Stock Markets: A Behavioral Approach to Securities Regulation’ (2002) 97 Northwestern University Law Review135Google Scholar
Gray, J. and Hamilton, J., Implementing Financial Regulation: Theory and Practice (Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2006), pp. 187–8Google Scholar
Devlin, J., ‘Monitoring the Success of Policy Initiatives to Increase Consumer Understanding of Financial Services’ (2003) 11 Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burn, L. and Wells, B., ‘The Pan-European Retail Market – Are We There Yet?’ (2007) 2 Capital Markets Law Journal263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, H., ‘Regulation in a Multisectored Financial Services Industry: An Exploration Essay’ (1999) 77 Washington University Law Quarterly319, 333Google Scholar
Williams, T., ‘Empowerment of Whom and for What? Financial Literacy Education and the New Regulation of Consumer Financial Services’ (2007) 29 Law and Policy226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tafara, E. and Peterson, R., ‘A Blueprint for Cross-Border Access to US Investors: A New International Framework’ (2007) 48 Harvard International Law Journal31Google Scholar
Jackson, H., ‘A System of Selective Substitute Compliance’ (2007) 48 Harvard International Law Journal 105, 110–13Google Scholar
Ramsay, I., ‘Consumer Law, Regulatory Capitalism and New Learning in Regulation’ (2006) 28 Sydney Law Review9Google Scholar
Black, J., ‘Decentring Regulation: Understanding the Role of Regulation and Self Regulation in a “Post Regulatory World”’ (2001) 54 Current Legal Problems103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, J., ‘The Sandler Review of Medium and Long-Term Retail Savings in the UK: Dilemmas for Financial Regulation’ (2002) 10 Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance385Google Scholar
French, K., ‘Presidential Address: The Cost of Active Investing’ (2008) 63 Journal of Finance1537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, F., ‘Noise’ (1986) 41 Journal of Finance529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, J. Bradford, Shleifer, A., Summers, L. and Waldmann, R., ‘Noise Trader Risk in Financial Markets’ (1990) 98 Journal of Political Economy703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribstein, L., ‘Market vs Regulatory Responses to Corporate Fraud: A Critique of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act 2002’ (2002) 28 Journal of Corporation Law1Google Scholar
Authers, J., ‘Is It Back to the Fifties?’, Financial Times, 25 March 2009, p. 9Google Scholar
Davies, P. and Wilson, J., ‘Deutsche Bank Faces Buyer Strike Over Decision Not to Redeem Bond’, Financial Times, 19 December 2008, p. 15Google Scholar
Johnson, S., ‘UK Investment Trusts Hit Hardest’, Financial Times, Fund Management Supplement, 8 December 2008, p. 1Google Scholar
Burgess, K. and Ross, A., ‘L&G investors will pay price of Lehman collapse’, Financial Times, 16 December 2008, p. 17Google Scholar
Johnson, S., ‘Hopes of Return to Calmer Times’, Financial Times, Fund Management Supplement, 5 January 2009, p. 1Google Scholar
Johnson, S., ‘UCITS Outflows Soar in Q3’, Financial Times, Fund Management Supplement, 1 December 2008, p. 2Google Scholar
Brewster, D., ‘Retail Investor Behaviour’, Financial Times, 25 March 2009, p. 9Google Scholar
Ricketts, D., ‘Mutual Funds Move Back into the Black’, Financial Times, Fund Management Supplement, 19 January 2009, p. 11Google Scholar
Pearson, G., ‘Risk and the Consumer in Australian Financial Services Reform’ (2006) 28 Sydney Law Review99Google Scholar
Jackson, H., ‘To What Extent Should Individual Investors Rely on the Mechanisms of Market Efficiency: A Preliminary Investigation of Dispersion in Investor Returns’ (2003) 28 Journal of Corporation Law671Google Scholar
Korobkin, R., ‘The Endowment Effect and Legal Analysis’ (2003) 97 Northwestern University Law Review1227Google Scholar
Ippolito, R., ‘Consumer Reaction to Measures of Poor Quality: Evidence from the Mutual Fund Industry’ (1995) 35 Journal of Law and Economics45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, P., ‘Manager–Investor Conflicts in Mutual Funds’ (2004) 18 Journal of Economic Perspectives161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thaler, R., ‘From Homo Economicus to Homo Sapiens’ (2000) 14 Journal of Economic Perspectives133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, J., ‘Household Finance’ (2006) 61 Journal of Finance1553, 1554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bainbridge, S., ‘Mandatory Disclosure: A Behavioral Analysis’ (2000) 68 University of Cincinnati Law Review1023Google Scholar
Bainbridge, S., ‘Whither Securities Regulation? Some Behavioral Observations Regarding Proposals for Its Future’ (2002) 51 Duke Law Journal1397Google Scholar
Stout, L., ‘The Mechanisms of Market Efficiency: An Introduction to the New Finance’ (2003) 28 Journal of Corporation Law635Google Scholar
Gilson, R. and Kraakman, R., ‘The Mechanisms of Market Efficiency Twenty Years Later: The Hindsight Bias’ (2003) 28 Journal of Corporation Law215Google Scholar
Augouleas, E., ‘Reforming Investor Protection Regulation: The Impact of Cognitive Biases’ in Faure, M. and Stephen, F. (eds.), Essays in the Law and Economics of Regulation In Honour of Anthony Ogus (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2008)Google Scholar
Simon, H., ‘A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice’ (1955) 69 Quarterly Journal of Economics99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiller, R., Irrational Exuberance (Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2000)Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A., ‘Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk’ (1979) 47 Econometrica263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shefrin, H. and Statman, M., ‘Explaining Investor Preference for Cash Dividends’ (1984) 13 Journal of Financial Economics253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bondt, W. and Thaler, R., ‘Does the Stock Market Overreact?’ (1985) 40 Journal of Finance793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benartzi, S. and Thaler, R., ‘Naive Diversification Strategies in Defined Contribution Savings Plans’ (2001) 91 American Economic Review79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odean, T., ‘Are Investors Reluctant to Realize Their Losses?’ (1998) 53 Journal of Finance1775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D., ‘Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions’ (1986) 59 Journal of Business251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langevoort, D., ‘Towards a More Effective Risk Disclosure for Technology-Enhanced Investing’ (1997) 75 Washington University Law Quarterly753Google Scholar
Sunstein, C., ‘What's Available? Social Influences and Behavioral Influences’ (2003) 97 Northwestern University Law Review1295Google Scholar
Korobkin, R. and Ulen, T., ‘Law and Behavioral Science: Removing the Rationality Assumption from Law and Economics’ (2000) 88 California Law Review1051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jolls, C., ‘Behavioral Economics Analysis of Redistributive Legal Rules’ (1998) 51 Vanderbilt Law Review1653Google Scholar
Bondt, W. and Thaler, R., ‘Financial Decision-Making in Markets and Firms: A Behavioral Perspective on Finance’ (1995) 9 Handbook of Operations Research and Management ScienceCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costanzo, L. and Ashton, J., ‘Product Innovation and Consumer Choice in the UK Financial Services Industry’ (2006) 14 Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benartzi, S. and Thaler, R., ‘How Much Is Investor Autonomy Worth?’ (2002) 57 Journal of Finance1593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Séjourné, B., Why Is the Behaviour of French Savers So Inconsistent with Standard Portfolio Theory? (AMF Working Papers, 2006)Google Scholar
Lusardi, A. and Mitchell, O., ‘Financial Literacy and Retirement Preparedness: Evidence and Implications for Financial Education’ (2007) 42 Business Economics35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, B., Lee, Y.-T., Liu, Y.-J. and Odean, T., ‘Just How Much Do Individual Investors Lose by Trading?’ (2009) 22 Review of Financial Studies609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrarini, G. and Wymeersch, E. (eds.), Investor Protection in Europe: Corporate Law Making, the MiFID and Beyond (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006), p. 321, pp. 334–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, T., ‘Illiteracy and Intervention: Wholesale Derivatives, Retail Mutual Funds, and the Matter of Asset Class’ (1996) 84 Georgetown Law Journal2319, 2364Google Scholar
Rachlinski, J., ‘The Uncertain Psychological Case for Paternalism’ (2003) 97 Northwestern University Law Review1165, 1185Google Scholar
Stiglitz, J., ‘Using Tax Policy to Curb Speculative Short-Term Trading’ (1989) 3 Journal of Financial Services Research101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stout, L., ‘Are Markets Costly Casinos? Disagreement, Market Failure, and Securities Regulation’ (1995) 81 Virginia Law Review611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, S., ‘Regulating Investors Not Issuers: A Market-Based Proposal’ (2000) 88 California Law Review279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kozup, J. and Hogarth, J., ‘Financial Literacy, Public Policy and Consumers’ Self Protection – More Questions, Fewer Answers' (2008) 42 Journal of Consumer Affairs127, 134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shleifer, A., Inefficient Markets: An Introduction to Behavioural Finance (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), pp. 28–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, P., ‘Is There a Cure for Excessive Trading?’ (1995) 81 Virginia Law Review713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Partnoy, F., ‘Why Markets Crash and What Law Can Do About It’ (2001) 61 University of Pittsburgh Law Review741Google Scholar
Grinblatt, M. and Keloharju, M., ‘The Investment Behaviour and Performance of Various Investor Types: A Study of Finland's Unique Data Set’ (2000) 55 Journal of Financial Economics43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frazzini, A. and Lamont, O., ‘Dumb Money: Mutual Fund Flows and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns’ (2008) Journal of Financial Economics299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaniel, R., Saar, G. and Titman, S., ‘Individual Investor Trading and Stock Return’ (2008) 63 Journal of Finance273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romano, R., ‘A Comment on Information Overload, Cognitive Illusion, and Their Implications for Public Policy’ (1986) 59 Southern California Law Review313, 325Google Scholar
Hong, H. and Stein, J., ‘A Unified Theory of Underreaction, Momentum Trading, and Overreaction in Asset Markets’ (1999) 54 Journal of Finance2143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, S. and Pritchard, A., ‘Behavioral Economics and the SEC’ (2003) 56 Stanford Law Review1Google Scholar
Coates, J. and Hubbard, R., ‘Competition in the Mutual Fund Industry: Evidence and Implications for Policy’ (2007) 33 Journal of Corporation Law151Google Scholar
Malmendier, U. and Shanthikumar, D., ‘Are Small Investors Naive about Incentives?’ (2007) 85 Journal of Financial Economics457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guiso, L., Sapienza, P. and Zingales, L., Household Portfolios (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001)Google Scholar
Haliassos, M. and Bertaut, C., ‘Why Do So Few Hold Stocks?’ (1995) The Economic Journal1110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guiso, L. and Japelli, T., ‘Awareness and Stock Market Participation’ (2005) 9 Review of Financial Studies537Google Scholar
Shum, P. and Faig, M., ‘What Explains Household Stock Holdings’ (2006) 30 Journal of Banking and Finance2579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cocco, J., Gomes, F. and Maenhout, P., ‘Consumption and Portfolio Choice over the Life-Cycle’ (2005) 18 Review of Financial Studies491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivkovich, Z. and Weisbenner, S., ‘Local Does as Local Is: Information Content of the Geography of Individual Investors’ Common Stock Investments' (2005) 60 Journal of Finance267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aneel, K. and Stoli, D., ‘Which Money Is Smart? Mutual Fund Buys and Sells of Individual Investors’ (2008) 63 Journal of Finance85Google Scholar
Barber, B. and Odean, T., ‘Out of Sight, Out of Mind: The Effects of Expenses on Mutual Fund Flows’ (2005) 78 Journal of Business2095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wachman, R. and Webb, T., ‘Week of Utter Carnage Moves the Crunch into the Real World’, The Observer, 12 October 2008, Business, p. 4Google Scholar
Ricketts, D., ‘Mutual Funds Move Back into the Black’, Financial Times, Fund Management Supplement, 19 January 2009, p. 11Google Scholar
Kozup, J., Howlett, E. and Pagano, M., ‘The Effects of Summary Information on Consumer Perceptions of Mutual Fund Characteristics’ (2008) 42 Journal of Consumer Affairs37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, C., ‘Trust in Financial Markets’ (2008) 14 European Financial Management617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knack, S. and Keefer, P., ‘Does Social Capital Have an Economic Pay-Off? A Cross-Country Investigation’ (1997) 112 Quarterly Journal of Economics1251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knack, S. and Zak, P., ‘Trust and Growth’ (2001) 111 Economic Journal295Google Scholar
Tanner, S., The Role of Information in Savings Decisions, Briefing Note 7 (London: Institute for Fiscal Studies, 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guiso, L., Sapienza, P. and Zingales, L., ‘The Role of Social Capital in Financial Development’ (2004) 94 American Economic Review526, 527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, M., ‘Comments on Lynn Stout's The Investor Confidence Game’ (2002–3) 68 Brooklyn Law Review449Google Scholar
Pritchard, A., ‘Self Regulation and Securities Markets’ (2003) Regulation32Google Scholar
Porta, R., Silanes, F. Lopez, Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R., ‘Trust in Large Organisations’ (1997) 87 American Economic Review333Google Scholar
Black, J., ‘Mapping the Contours of Contemporary Financial Services Regulation’ (2002) 2 Journal of Corporate Law Studies253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goshen, Z. and Parchomosky, K., ‘On Insider Trading, Markets and Negative Property Rights in Information’ (2001) 87 Virginia Law Review1229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, S., ‘Selective Disclosure in the Public Capital Markets’ (2002) 35 University of California (Davis) Law Review533Google Scholar
Romano, R., ‘The Sarbanes–Oxley Act and the Making of Quack Corporate Governance’ (2005) 114 Yale Law Journal1521Google Scholar
Gray, J., ‘Personal Finance and Corporate Governance: The Missing Link: Product Regulation and Policy Conflict’ (2004) 4 Journal of Corporate Law Studies187, 190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochberg, J., Sapienza, P. and Vissing-Jørgensen, A., ‘A Lobbying Approach to Evaluating the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002’ (2009) 47 Journal of Accounting Research519)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karmel, R., ‘Mutual Funds, Pension Funds and Stock Market Volatility – What Regulation by the Securities and Exchange Commission Is Appropriate?’ (2004–5) 80 Notre Dame Law Review909, 912Google Scholar
Porta, R., Silanes, F. Lopez, Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R., ‘Law and Finance’ (1998) 106 Journal of Political Economy1113)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, S., ‘Law, Finance, and Path Dependence: Developing Strong Securities Markets’ (2002) 80 Texas Law Review1657Google Scholar
Porta, R., Silanes, F. Lopez, Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R., ‘Legal Determinants of External Finance’ (1997) 52 Journal of Finance1131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porta, R., Silanes, F. Lopez, Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R., ‘What Works in Securities Laws’ (2006) 61 Journal of Finance1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guiso, L., Sapienza, P. and Zingales, L., ‘Does Culture Affect Economic Outcomes?’ (2006) 20 Journal of Economic Perspectives23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajan, R. and Zingales, L., ‘The Great Reversals: The Politics of Financial Development in the Twentieth Century’ (2003) 69 Journal of Financial Economics5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coffee, J., ‘The Rise of Dispersed Ownership: The Roles of Law and the State in the Separation of Ownership and Control’ (2001) 111 Yale Law Journal1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheffins, B., ‘Does Law Matter?: The Separation of Ownership and Control in the United Kingdom’ (2001) 30 Journal of Legal Studies459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferran, E. and Cearns, K., ‘Non-Enforcement-Led Public Oversight of Financial and Corporate Governance Disclosure and of Auditors’ (2008) 8 Journal of Corporate Law Studies191Google Scholar
Jackson, H., ‘Variations in the Intensity of Financial Regulation: Preliminary Evidence and Potential Implications’ (2007) 24 Yale Journal on Regulation253Google Scholar
Hong, H., Kubik, J. and Stein, J., ‘Social Interaction and Stock-Market Participation’ (2004) 59 Journal of Finance137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banks, J., Blundell, R. and Smith, J., ‘Understanding Differences in Household Financial Wealth Between the US and Great Britain’ (2003) 38 Journal of Human Resources241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shingleton, J., ‘Australia Acts to Reassure Pensioners’, Financial Times, Fund Management Supplement, 1 December 2008, p. 11Google Scholar
Enriques, L. and Gatti, M., ‘The Uneasy Case for Top-Down Corporate Law Harmonization in the European Union’ (2006) 27 University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law939Google Scholar
Choi, S., ‘A Framework for the Regulation of Securities Market Intermediaries’ (2004) 1 Berkeley Business Law Journal45Google Scholar
Moloney, N., ‘Law-Making Risks in EC Financial Market Regulation after the Financial Service Action Plan’ in Weatherill, S. (ed.), Better Regulation (Oxford and Portland, OR, Hart Publishing, 2007), p. 321Google Scholar
Moloney, N., EC Securities Regulation (2nd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 1095–7Google Scholar
Black, J., ‘Forms and Paradoxes of Principles-Based Regulation’ (2008) 2 Capital Markets Law Journal425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, C., ‘New Governance, Compliance, and Principles-Based Securities Regulation’ (2008) 45 American Business Law Journal1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kershaw, D., ‘Evading Enron: Taking Principles Too Seriously in Accounting Regulation’ (2005) 68 Modern Law Review594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, J., Hopper, M. and Band, C., ‘Making a Success of Principles-Based Regulation’ (2007) 1 Law and Financial Markets Review191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen, P. Thal, ‘FSA Faces Fight to Regain Global Reputation’, Financial Times, 19 March 2009, p. 3Google Scholar
William, J., Sherwod, B. and Scholtes, S., ‘Queues Outside Bank Damaged Case for Light-Touch Regulation’, Financial Times, 21 January 2008, p. 1Google Scholar
Kaplow, L., ‘Rules v. Principles. An Economic Analysis’ (1992) 42 Duke Law Journal557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratton, W., ‘Enron, Sarbanes–Oxley, and Accounting: Rules versus Principles versus Rents’ (2003) 48 Villanova Law Review1023, 1037Google Scholar
MacNeill, I., ‘The Evolution of Regulatory Enforcement Action in the UK Capital Markets: A Case of “Less Is More”’? (2007) 2 Capital Markets Law Journal345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, M. and Stainsby, J., ‘Pause for Thought: The FSA Needs to Decide What Status It Intends to Ascribe to Industry Guidance’ (2007) 26(1) International Financial Law Review40Google Scholar
Coase, J., ‘Problems of Social Cost’ (1960) 3 Journal of Law and Economics1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,International Organization of Securities Commissions, The Regulatory Environment for Hedge Funds: A Survey and Comparison (IOSCO, 2006)Google Scholar
Lomnicka, E., The Financial Services and Markets Act: An Annotated Guide (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2002), pp. 375–445Google Scholar
Mahoney, P., ‘The Development of Securities Law in the United States’ (2009) 47 Journal of Accounting Research325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, J., ‘High Court Rules Customer Who Opted from Private to Intermediate Customer Status to Have Been Contributorily Negligent to His Spread Betting Losses’ (2008) 16 Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parry, H., ‘Hedge Funds, Hot Markets, and the High Net Worth Investor: A Case for Greater Protection’ (2001) 21 Northwestern Journal of International Business Law703Google Scholar
Rubinstein, M., ‘Markowitz's “Portfolio Selection”: A Fifty Year Retrospective’ (2002) 57 Journal of Finance1041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easterbrook, F. and Fischel, D., ‘Optimal Damages in Securities Cases’ (1985) 52 University of Chicago Law Review611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth, R., ‘The End of Securities Fraud Class Action’ (2006) 29 Regulation46Google Scholar
Evans, E., ‘The Investor Compensation Fund’ (2007–8) 33 Journal of Corporation Law223Google Scholar
Coval, J. and Moskowitz, T., ‘Home Bias at Home: Local Equity Preference in Domestic Portfolios’ (1999) 54 Journal of Finance2045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, K., ‘Trying to Explain Home Bias in Equities and Consumption’ (1997) 37 Journal of Economics Literature571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villiers, C., Corporate Reporting and Company Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), p. 199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ondrej, P., ‘ICMA's Response to CESR on the Prospectus Directive and the Regulation’, ICMA Regulatory Policy Newsletters No. 5, April 2007, p. 2Google Scholar
Revell, S. and Cole, E., ‘Practical Issues Arising from the Implementation of the Prospectus Directive – What Are the Equity Capital Markets Worrying About?’ (2006) 1 Capital Markets Law Journal77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferran, E., Building an EU Securities Market (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), pp. 205–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, A., ‘MiFID's Impact upon the Retail Investment Services Markets’ in Skinner, C. (ed.), The Future of Investing in Europe's Markets after MiFID (Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2007), p. 207Google Scholar
Johnson, S., ‘Bond “Hype” Causing Concern’, Financial Times, Fund Management Supplement, 26 January 2009, p. 2Google Scholar
Salmon, F., ‘Stop Selling Bonds to Retail Investors’ (2004) 35 Georgetown Journal of International Law837Google Scholar
,International Organization of Securities Commissions, Transparency of Corporate Bond Markets (IOSCO, 2004), p. 4Google Scholar
,International Organization of Securities Commissions, International Disclosure Principles for Cross-Border Offerings and Listings of Debt Securities by Foreign Issuers (IOSCO, 2007), p. 1Google Scholar
,Centre for Economic Policy Research (Biais, B., Declerck, F., Dow, J., Portes, R. and von-Thadden, E.-L.), European Corporate Bond Markets: Transparency, Liquidity and Efficiency (CEPR, 2006)Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×