Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-29T17:30:55.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Popular mobilizations: Jews and lunatics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2010

Ann Goldberg
Affiliation:
University of California, Riverside
Get access

Summary

In the early twentieth century, in the tiny town of Reppen near Frankfurt/Oder, a Jewish merchant from Berlin, Spiegel, was standing in a courtroom before a local magistrate when the latter, pointing at Spiegel, turned to his clerk and asked with disdain, “So what does this Jew want?” Mortified, Spiegel did what any self-respecting German would have done: he sued, rushing home to employ the services of the famous Berlin defense attorney Fritz Friedmann. Spiegel got his insult trial, but in a place like Reppen it had the feel of a rigged Jim Crow courtroom. The antisemitic community was outraged at the affrontery of the suit, and Spiegel, probably sensing trouble, skipped the trial altogether, sending his lawyer in his stead. Entering the courtroom on the day of the trial, Friedmann had a portent of things to come when he found the defendant (the town's judge) socializing in a backroom with the judge-juror panel presiding over the case. The mood in the courtroom and in the town was so menacing that, after the case was dismissed, Friedmann, himself a Jew and fearing for his life, fled in the first train back to Berlin.

Spiegel's reaction to an insult made sense given the honor culture in which he lived. But the basis of his lawsuit was something new and, in a place like Reppen, controversial: antisemitism. Filing such a suit presupposed an inherent Jewish claim to dignity and the right to defend it in law.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Fritz, Friedmann, Was ich erlebte vol. 1 (Berlin, 1908), pp. 164 ff.Google Scholar
Sabine, Ullmann, Nachbarschaft und Konkurrenz (Göttingen, 1999), pp. 451–58.Google Scholar
Aschaffenburg, G., Das Verbrechen und seine Bekämpfung (Heidelberg, 1903), p. 42Google Scholar
Ute, Frevert, Men of Honor: A Social and Cultural History of the Duel (Cambridge, MA, 1995), pp. 113ffGoogle Scholar
Barnet, Hartston, Sensationalizing the Jewish Question: Anti-Semitic Trials and the Press in the Early German Empire (Leiden, 2005), pp. 87ff.Google Scholar
Deborah, Hertz, “Dueling for Emancipation: Jewish Masculinity in the Era of Napoleon,” in Marion, Kaplan et al. (eds.), Jüdische Welten (Göttingen, 2005), pp. 69–85Google Scholar
Kathy, Stuart, Defiled Trades and Social Outcasts: Honor and Ritual Pollution in Early Modern Germany (Cambridge, 1999Google Scholar
Herzl, , Das neue Ghetto (Vienna and Berlin, 1920), p. 26.Google Scholar
Arnold, Paucker, “Der jüdische Abwehrkampf,” in Werner, Mosse (ed.), Entscheidungsjahr 1932: Zur Judenfrage in der Endphase der Weimarer Republik (Tübingen, 1966), pp. 405–99Google Scholar
Sanford, Ragins, Jewish Responses to Anti-Semitism in Germany, 1870–1914 (Cincinnati, 1980Google Scholar
Marjorie, Lamberti, Jewish Activism in Imperial Germany (New Haven, 1978)Google Scholar
Richard, Levy, The Downfall of the Anti-Semitic Political Parties in Imperial Germany (New Haven, 1975)Google Scholar
Douglas, G. Morris, Justice Imperiled: The Anti-Nazi Lawyer Max Hirschberg in Weimar Germany (Ann Arbor, 2005).Google Scholar
Alfred, Michaelis (ed.), Die Rechtsverhältnisse der Juden in Preussen (Berlin, 1910), p. 548–49.
Rechtssprechung des deutschen Reichsgerichts in Strafsachen 3 (Munich and Leipzig, 1881), p. 606
Bernhard, Beyer, Die Bestrebungen zur Reform des Irrenwesens (Halle, 1912)Google Scholar
Kretzschmar, Fr., Die Irrenfrage am Ausgange des 19. Jahrhunderts (Großenhain, 1896), p. 253.Google Scholar
Heinz-Peter, Schmiedebach, “Eine ‘anti-psychiatrische Bewegung’ um die Jahrhundertwende,” in Martin, Dinges (ed.), Medizinkritische Bewegungen im Deutschen Reich (Stuttgart, 1996), pp. 127–59Google Scholar
Karen, Nolte, “Querulantenwahnsinn – ‘Eiginsinn’ oder ‘Irrsinn’?” in idem et al. (eds), Moderne Anstaltspsychiatrie im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert – Legitimation und Kritik (Stuttgart, 2006), pp. 395–410Google Scholar
Rebecca, Schwoch and Heinz-Peter, Schmiedebach, “‘Querulantenwahnsinn,’ Pschiatrikritik und Öffentlichkeit um 1900,” Medizin Historisches Journal 42 (2007), 30–60Google Scholar
Thomas, Rechlin, Antipsychiatrie, ihre Wurzeln und Voraussetzungen (Bochum, 1987)Google Scholar
Norman, Dain, “Psychiatry and Anti-Psychiatry in the U.S.,” in Mark, Micale and Roy, Porter (eds.), Discovering the History of Psychiatry (New York, 1994), pp. 415–44Google Scholar
Gerald, Grob, From Asylum to Community (Princeton, 1991).Google Scholar
Andreas, Daum, Wissenschaftspopularisierung im 19. Jahrhundert (Munich, 1998)Google Scholar
Paul, Weindling, Health, Race and German Politics (Cambridge, 1989), pp. 3ff.Google Scholar
Joachim, Radkau, Das Zeitalter der Nervosität (Munich, 2000)Google Scholar
Ann, Goldberg, “Conventions of Madness: Bürgerlichkeit and the Asylum in the Vormärz,” Central European History 33 (2000), 173–93.Google Scholar
Ludwig, Ernst, Für die Lebendig Begraben, 2nd edn (Vienna, 1904), pp. 30–31, 41.Google Scholar
Zustände in der Heidelberger Universitäts-Irren-Klinik. Oder 5 Tage lebendig begraben (Heidelberg, 1908)
Michel, Foucault, Discipline and Punish, trans. Alan, Sheridan (New York, 1977).Google Scholar
Rudolf, Arndt, Geisteskrank. Unzurechnungsfähig. Entmündigt (Greifswald, 1896), p. 12Google Scholar
Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch vom 18. August 1896 (Munich, 1902), p. 453.
Ernst, Müller, Drei Monate ohne Grund im Irrenhause (Dresden, 1898), p. 5.Google Scholar
Doris, Kaufmann, Aufklärung, bürgerliche Selbsterfahrung und die ‘Erfindung’ der Psychiatrie in Deutschland, 1770–1850 (Göttingen, 1995)Google Scholar
Ewald, Krüner, Moderne Folterkammern, 5th edn (Hagen and Zurich, 1913)Google Scholar
Klos, P., Deutsche Beamtenherrschaft in ihrer ganzen Machtentfaltung (Zurich, 1909)Google Scholar
Carl, Brill, Pflichtwidrigkeiten hiesiger Richter in einem Ehescheidungensprozeß (Magdeburg, 1906)Google Scholar
Anton, Maleszka, Wie man Geisteskranke fabriziert (Berlin, 1905)Google Scholar
Georg, Platner, Modernes Standrecht (Zurich, 1896).Google Scholar
Hans, Schmidt, “Das Haus des Schreckens” oder Dichtung und Wahrheit (Leipzig, 1890)Google Scholar
Franz, Schäfer, Ein “Schwabenstreich” der Züricher Polizei oder 4 Tage “auf Beobachtung” in der Züricher Irrenanstalt Burghöli (Belfast, 1897)Google Scholar
Margarita, Stocker, Judith. Sexual Warrior (New Haven, 1998).Google Scholar
Morris, Jonge, Ein Akt moderner Tortur (Berlin, 1890).Google Scholar
Ahrens, Ad., Anti-Vernunft. Beweisstücke für die jetzigen ungenügenden Irrengesetze (Hamburg, 1891).Google Scholar
Eine Mutter im Irrenhause. Beitrag zur Sittengeschichte unserer Zeit (Bremen, 1851), p. 142
Der Prozeß der Familie Gabe in Hamburg (Bremen, 1851).
Zustände in der Staats-Irrenanstalt Winnenthal (Stuttgart, 1895), p. 5.
Kretzschmar, , Die Unvollkommenheit der heutigen Psychiatrie und die Mangelhaftigkeit der deutschen Irrengesetzgebung (Leipzig, 1891), p. 5.Google Scholar
Offene Briefe an Seine Majestät den König von Preußen (Charlottenburg, 1896)
Carl, Paasch, Offener Brief an Reichskanzler von Caprivi (Leipzig, 1891).Google Scholar
“Hallucinationen” und Gegenbeweise. Ein Rechtsfall (Salzburg, 1897)
Margaret, Anderson, Practicing Democracy: Elections and Political Culture in Imperial Germany (Princeton, 2000Google Scholar
Carl, Witte, Mein Conflict mit Herrn Hof- und Domprediger Stöcker (Berlin, 1889)Google Scholar
Walter, Frank, Hofprediger Adolf Stoecker und die christlichsoziale Bewegung (Hamburg, 1935)Google Scholar
Liepmann, , “Die Beleidigung,” in Mittermaier, et al. (eds.), Vergleichende Darstellung des deutschen und ausländischen Strafrechts: Besonderer Teil vol. 4 (Berlin, 1906), p. 69Google Scholar
Heinrich, Schüle, Klinische Psychiatrie (Leipzig, 1886), quoted in Beyer, Bestrebungen, pp. 359–63.Google Scholar
Künstlicher Irrsinn. Eine Warnung vor Irrenanstalten (Leipzig, 1894), p. 24
Kevin, Repp, Reformers Critics, and the Paths of German Modernity (Cambridge, MA, 2000)Google Scholar
Geoff, Eley, Reshaping the German Right (Ann Arbor, MI, 1991).Google Scholar
“Zur Entwicklung völkischen Rechtsdenkens. Frühe rechtsradikale Programmatik und bürgerliche Rechtswissenschaft,” in Hans, Jochen Vogel et al. (eds.), Die Freiheit des Anderen: Festschrift für Martin Hirsch (Baden-Baden, 1981), pp. 87–88.
Kretzschmar, , Die Unvollkommenheit der heutigen Psychiatrie und die Mangelhaftigkeit der deutschen Irrengesetzgebung [Leipzig, 1891], p. 59).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×