Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Note on the text and list of abbreviations
- Prologue: decadence or rebirth? The European fin de siècle and the Russian precursors
- Part 1 The art of the cell
- Part 2 Collective creation
- 4 The foundation of Mir Iskusstva and the role of the visual and performing arts. Benois, Diagilev, Filosofov and their group (1890–1904)
- 5 From Mir Iskusstva to Novyi Put'. The development of Merezhkovsky's prose and thought, Rozanov, Shestov (1898–1904)
- 6 Russian Symbolism comes of age. Skorpion, Severnye Tsvety and Vesy. Briusov as organiser and teacher (1900–4)
- Part 3 Gleams of paradise
- Part 4 A glittering hell
- Part 5 Our home from the beginning
- Epilogue
- Chronology
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Index
4 - The foundation of Mir Iskusstva and the role of the visual and performing arts. Benois, Diagilev, Filosofov and their group (1890–1904)
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 January 2010
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Note on the text and list of abbreviations
- Prologue: decadence or rebirth? The European fin de siècle and the Russian precursors
- Part 1 The art of the cell
- Part 2 Collective creation
- 4 The foundation of Mir Iskusstva and the role of the visual and performing arts. Benois, Diagilev, Filosofov and their group (1890–1904)
- 5 From Mir Iskusstva to Novyi Put'. The development of Merezhkovsky's prose and thought, Rozanov, Shestov (1898–1904)
- 6 Russian Symbolism comes of age. Skorpion, Severnye Tsvety and Vesy. Briusov as organiser and teacher (1900–4)
- Part 3 Gleams of paradise
- Part 4 A glittering hell
- Part 5 Our home from the beginning
- Epilogue
- Chronology
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
Надо идти напролом. Надо поражать и не бояться этого, надо выступать сразу, показать себя целиком, со всеми качествами и недостатками своей национальности.
С. П. ДягилевIt was not critics or poets but painters, musicians and men enamoured of the performing arts who finally found the confidence to break out from the art of the cell and to launch the first Russian modernist journal: Mir Iskusstva (The World of Art, 1898–1904). Nor was it, primarily, the new middle class of Moscow of which Briusov was so striking a representative, but a cosmopolitan group of Petersburg amateurs of the fine arts, closely linked by blood and patronage to the dvorianstvo and the court, who undertook to bring ‘Russian art to the notice of the West, to make it big and known’, and who were bold enough to put the question: ‘Are we capable of saying something new in European art or is it our lot to trail along behind?’ Before the century was out, however, the three forces – the lonely poets and thinkers, the Petersburg aesthetes and the new Moscow bourgeoisie – were allied. Their subsequent disintegration, which began after 1905 and which culminated in the 1910 crisis of Symbolism, was in new directions.
The prehistory of Mir Iskusstva began in Petersburg, where a group calling themselves the ‘Nevsky Pickwickians’ originated within a nucleus of friends at a private school run by the Hoffmannesque German pedagogue, Karl Ivanovich May.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- A History of Russian Symbolism , pp. 93 - 122Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1994