Abe, J. A. and Izard, C. E. 1999. “A longitudinal study of emotion expression and personality relations in early development,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77: 566–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Abelson, R. P. 1985. “A variance explanation paradox: when a little is a lot,” Psychological Bulletin, 97: 129–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abramson, L. Y. and Alloy, L. B. 1981. “Depression, non-depression, and cognitive illusions: a reply to Schwartz,” Journal of Experimental Psychology, 110: 436–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ackerman, P. L. and Beier, M. E. 2003. “Intelligence, personality, and interests in the career choice process,” Journal of Career Assessment, 11(2): 205–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adams, H. [1900] 2000. The Education of Henry Adams. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar

Adler, A. [1931] 1958. What Life Should Mean to You. New York: Capricorn Books.Google Scholar

Adler, A. [1927] 1959. Understanding Human Nature. New York: Premier Books.Google Scholar

Adler, L., Wedekind, D., Pitz, J., Weniger, G., and Huether, G. 1997. “Endocrine correlates of personality traits: a comparison between emotionally stable and emotionally labile healthy young men,” Neuropsychobiology, 35(4): 205–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Adolphs, R. and Damasio, A. R. 1998. “The human amygdala in social judgment,” Nature, 393: 470–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., and Damasio, A. R. 1994. “Impaired recognition of emotion in facial expressions following bilateral damage to the human amygdala,” Nature, 372: 669–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Agonito, R. 1977. History of Ideas on Woman: A Source Book. New York: Perigee Books.Google Scholar

Aiken, L. R. 2000. Psychological Testing and Assessment, 10th edn. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar

Ainsworth, M. D. S. 1962. “The effects of maternal deprivation: a review of findings and controversy in the context of research strategy,” in Deprivation of Maternal Care: A Reassessment of its Effects, Health Papers, 14. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar

Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., and Wall, S. 1978. Patterns of Attachment: A Psychological Study of the Strange Situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Albright, C. R. and Ashbrook, J. B. 2001. Where God Lives in the Human Brain. Napierville, IL: Sourcebooks.Google Scholar

Aldis, O. 1975. Play Fighting. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Allen, J. R. and Allen, B. A. 1995. “Narrative theory, redecision therapy, and postmodernism,” Transactional Analysis Journal, 25: 327–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allen, T. W. 1971. “The individual psychology of Alfred Adler: an item of history and a promise of a revolution,” The Counseling Psychologist, 3(1): 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allport, G. W. [1937] 1961. Personality: A Psychological Interpretation, rev. edn. New York: Henry HoltGoogle Scholar

Allport, G. W. 1955. Becoming: Basic Considerations for a Psychology of Personality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Allport, G. W. 1960. Personality and Social Encounter: Selected Essays. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Allport, G. W. 1967. “Autobiography,” in Boring, E. G. and Lindzey, G. (eds.), A History of Psychology in Autobiography. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, vol. 5, pp. 1–25.Google Scholar

Allport, G. W. 1968. The Person in Psychology: Selected Essays. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Allport, G. W. and Odbert, H. S. 1936. “Trait-names: a psycho-lexical study,” Psychological Monographs, 47:1 (whole No. 211).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allport, G. W. and Vernon, P. E. 1933. Studies in Expressive Movement. New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education 1999. Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

,American Psychiatric Association 1980. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd edn. Washington, DC.Google Scholar

,American Psychological Association 1975. “Report of the task force on sex bias and sex-role stereotyping in psychotherapeutic practice,” American Psychologist, 30(12): 1169–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,American Psychological Association 2002. “Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct,” American Psychologist, 57: 1060–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,American Psychological Association 2007. “Paul Rozin: award for distinguished scientific contributions,” American Psychologist, 62(8): 751–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anastasi, A. 1988. Psychological Testing, 6th edn. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Anastasi, A. and Urbina, S. 1997. Psychological Testing, 7th edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Andreasen, N. C. 2005. The Creating Brain: The Neuroscience of Genius. New York: Danna Press.Google Scholar

Angyal, A. 1951. “A theoretical model for personality studies,” Journal of Personality, 20: 131–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ansbacher, H. L. and Ansbacher, R. R. (eds.) 1956. The Individual Psychology of Alfred Adler: A Systematic Presentation in Selections from his Writings. New York: Basic Books.

Antelman, S. M. and Caggiula, A. R. 1977. “Tails of stress-related behavior: a neuropharmacological model,” in Hanin, I. and Usdin, E. (eds.), Animal Models in Psychiatry and Neurology. New York: Pergamon, pp. 227–45.Google Scholar

Archer, J. 1996. “Sex differences in social behavior: are the social role and evolutionary explanations compatible?,” American Psychologist, 51: 909–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Arendt, H. 1958. The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Ariès, P. 1962. Centuries of Childhood: A Social History of Family Life, trans. Baldick, R.. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar

Aristotle, [c. 320 bc] 1991. Nichomachean Ethics, trans. Ross, W. D.et al., in Encyclopædia Britannica edn., Great Books of the Western World. University of Chicago Press, vol. 8.Google Scholar

Arnold, M. B. 1960. Emotion and Personality. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Aron, A., Fisher, H., Mashek, D. J., Strong, G., Li, H. F., and Brown, L. L. 2005. “Reward, motivation, and emotion systems associated with early-stage intense romantic love,” Journal of Neurophysiology, 94(1): 327–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Asch, D. A., Patton, J. P., and Hershey, J. C. 1990. “Knowing for the sake of knowing,” Medical Decision Making, 10: 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Augustine, [400 ce] 1912. On the Trinity, trans. Haddan, A. West, Rand, in Benjamin (ed.), The Classical Psychologists. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Augustine, [400 ce] 1991a. The Confessions, trans. Pine-Coffin, R. S., Chicago, IL: Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc., vol. 16, pp. 1–159.Google Scholar

Augustine, [400 ce] 1991b. On Christian Doctrine, trans. Shaw, J. F., 1961. Chicago, IL: Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc., vol. 16, pp. 701–84.Google Scholar

Ausubel, D. P., Sullivan, E. V., and Ives, S. W. 1980. Theory and Problems of Child Development. New York: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar

Baldwin, J. M. [1897] 1906. Mental Development in the Child and the Race, 3rd edn. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Balog, A. 1997. “Inner-directed actions,” Sociological Perspectives, 40: 33–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baltes, P. B. 1983. “Life-span developmental psychology: observations on history and theory revisited,” in Lerner, R. M. (ed.), Developmental Psychology: Historical and Philosophical Perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 70–111.Google Scholar

Baltes, P. B. 1987. “Theoretical propositions of life-span developmental psychology: on the dynamics between growth and decline,” Developmental Psychology, 23(5): 611–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baltes, P. B. 1997. “On the incomplete architecture of human ontogeny: selection, optimization, and compensation as foundation of developmental theory,” American Psychologist, 52(4): 366–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Baltes, P. B. and Graf, P. 1996. “Psychological aspects of aging: facts and frontiers,” in Magnusson, D. (ed.), The Lifespan Development of Individuals: Behavioural, Neurobiological and Psychosocial Perspectives. Cambridge University Press, pp. 427–60.Google Scholar

Baltes, P. B., Reuter-Lorenz, P. A., and Rösler, F. 2006a. “Prologue: biocultural co-constructivism as a theoretical metascript,” in Baltes, P. B., Reuter-Lorenz, P. A., and Rösler, F. (eds.), pp. 3–39.

Baltes, P. B., Reuter-Lorenz, P. A., and Rösler, F. (eds.) 2006b. Lifespan Development and the Brain: The Perspective of Biocultural Co-constructivism. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Baltes, P. B. and Staudinger, U. M. (2000). “Wisdom: a metaheuristic (pragmatic) to orchestrate mind and virtue toward excellence,” American Psychologist, 55: 122–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bandura, A. 1969. Principles of Behavior Modification. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar

Bandura, A. 1982. “Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency,” American Psychologist, 37: 122–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bandura, A. 1986. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Bandura, A. 1998. “Exploration of fortuitous determinants of life paths,” Psychological Inquiry, 9(2): 95–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bandura, A. 1999. “Social cognitive theory of personality,” in Pervin, L. A. and John, O. P. (eds.), pp. 154–96.

Bargh, J. A., and Chartrand, T. L. 1999. “The unbearable automaticity of being,” American Psychologist, 54: 462–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barlow, G. 1977. “Modal action patterns,” in Sebeok, T. A. (ed.), How Animals Communicate. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, pp. 98–134.Google Scholar

Bar-On, R. 1997. The Bar-On Emotional Quotient Inventory: A Measure of Emotional Intelligence. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar

Baron-Cohen, S. 2005. “The neuropsychology of autism and pervasive developmental disorders – The extreme male brain theory: an expert interview with Simon Baron-Cohen.” Medscape Psychiatry and Mental Health, December 14. Available at: www.medscape.com/viewarticle/518449.

Baron-Cohen, S., Knickmeyer, R. C., and Belmonte, M. K. 2005. “Sex differences in the brain: implications for explaining autism,” Science, 310(5749): 819–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Barrett, L. F. and Russell, J. 1998. “Independence and bipolarity in the structure of current affect,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(4): 967–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barron, F. X. 1955. “The disposition toward originality,” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51: 478–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Barron, F. X. 1969. Creative Person and Creative Process. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar

Batson, C. D., Batson, J. G., Slingsby, J. K., Harrell, K. L., Peekna, H. M., and Todd, R. M. 1991. “Empathic joy and the empathy–altruism hypothesis,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61: 413–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Baumeister, R. F. 1988. “Should we stop studying sex differences altogether?,” American Psychologist, 43: 1092–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baumeister, R. F. 1994. “The crystallization of discontent in the process of major life change,” in Heatherton, T. F. and Weinberger, J. L. (eds.), pp. 281–97.

Baumeister, R. F. 1999. “On the interface between personality and social psychology,” in Pervin, L. A. and John, O. P. (eds.), pp 347–66.

Baumeister, R. F. and Twenge, J. 2003. “The social self,” in Millon, T. and Lerner, M. J. (eds.), Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 5: The Handbook of Psychology. New York: Wiley, pp. 327–52.Google Scholar

Bayer, R. and Spitzer, R. L. 1985. “Neurosis, psychodynamics, and DSM-III,” Archives of General Psychiatry, 42: 187–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Becker, H. 1952. “Science, culture, and society,” Philosophy of Science, 19: 273–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beer, J. M., Arnold, R. D., and Loehlin, J. C. 1998. “Genetic and environmental influences on MMPI factor scales: joint model fitting to twin and adoption data,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74: 818–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Belsky, J. K. 1990. The Psychology of Aging: Theory, Research, and Interventions. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar

Belsky, J. and Nezworski, T. (eds.) 1988. Clinical Implications of Attachment. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Bem, S. L. 1974. “The measurement of psychological androgyny,” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42: 155–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bem, S. L. 1977. “On the utility of alternative procedures for assessing psychological androgyny,” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45: 196–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bem, S. L. 1993. The Lenses of Gender: Transforming the Debate on Sexual Inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Bem, D. J. and Allen, A. 1974. “On predicting some of the people some of the time: the search for cross-situational consistencies in behavior,” Psychological Review, 81: 506–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benedict, R. 1946. The Chrysanthemum and the Sword: Patterns of Japanese Culture. Cambridge, MA: Riverside Press.Google Scholar

Benedict, R. [1932] 1949. Patterns of Culture. London: Routledge & Kegan.Google Scholar

Benenson, J. F. 1993. “Greater preference among females than males for dyadic interaction in early childhood,” Child Development, 64: 544–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ben-Porath, Y. S. and Butcher, J. N. 1991. “The historical development of personality assessment,” in Walker, C. E. (ed.), Clinical Psychology: Historical and Research Foundations. New York: Plenum, pp. 121–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berlyne, D. E. 1950. “Novelty and curiosity as determinants of exploratory behavior,” British Journal of Psychology, 41: 68–80.Google Scholar

Berlyne, D. E. 1954. “A theory of human curiosity,” British Journal of Psychology, 45: 180–91.Google ScholarPubMed

Berlyne, D. E. 1960. Conflict, Arousal, and Curiosity. New York: McGraw Hill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berlyne, D. E. 1966. “Curiosity and exploration,” Science 153(3731): 25–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bernal, M. 1987. Black Athena: The Afro-Asiatic Roots of Classical Civilization. London: Free Association Books, vol. 1.Google Scholar

Bernard, C. 1869. “Des effets physiologiques de la morphine et leur combinaison avec ceux du chloroforme,” Bulletin Thérapeutique, 77: 241–56. Paris: Baillière.Google Scholar

Bernard, J. 1950. “Can science transcend culture?,” Scientific Monthly, 7: 268–73.Google Scholar

Bernstein, J. 1993. Cranks, Quarks, and the Cosmos: Writings on Science. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Berscheid, E. 1985. “Interpersonal attraction,” in Lindzey, G. and Aronson, E. (eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology, 3rd edn. New York: Random House, vol. II, pp. 413–84.Google Scholar

Beutler, L. E., Williams, R. E., Wakefield, P. J., and Entwhistle, S. R. 1995. “Bridging scientist and practitioner perspectives in clinical psychology,” American Psychologist, 50(12): 984–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bhattacharya, M. and Chatterjee, R. 2000. “Collaborative innovation as a process for cognitive development,” Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 11(3–4): 295–312.Google Scholar

Birren, J. E. and Schaie, K. W. 1996. Handbook of the Psychology of Aging, 3rd edn. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Blackburn, R., Renwick, S. J. D., Donnelly, J. P., and Logan, C. 2004. “Big Five or big two: superordinate factors in the NEO Five-Factor Inventory and the Antisocial Personality Questionnaire,” Personality and Individual Differences, 5(37): 957–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blatner, A. 2001. “Psychodrama,” in Corsini, R. J. (ed.), Handbook of Innovative Therapies, 2nd edn. New York: Wiley, pp. 530–53.Google Scholar

Block, J. 1995a. “A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description,” Psychological Bulletin, 117: 187–215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Block, J. 1995b. “Going beyond the five factors given: rejoinder to Costa and McCrae (1995) and Goldberg and Saucier (1995),” Psychological Bulletin, 117(2): 226–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bloom, H. 1998. Shakespeare: The Invention of the Human. New York: Riverhead Books/Penguin Putnam.Google Scholar

Bohan, J. S. (ed.) 1992. “Prologue: reviewing psychology, replacing women –an end searching for a means,” in Bohan, J. S. (ed.), Seldom Seen, Rarely Heard: Women's Place in Psychology. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 9–54.

Bordin, E. S. 1994. “Intrinsic motivation and the active self: convergence from a psychodynamic perspective,” in Savickas, M. L. and Lent, R. W. (eds.), Convergence in Career Development Theories. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, pp. 53–61.Google Scholar

Boring, E. G. 1950. A History of Experimental Psychology, 2nd edn. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Bornstein, M. H. 1989. “Sensitive periods in development: structural characteristics and causal interpretations,” Psychological Bulletin, 105: 179–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bornstein, R. F. 1992. “Subliminal mere exposure effects,” in Bornstein, R. F. and Pittman, T. S. (eds.), Perception without Awareness: Cognitive, Clinical, and Social Perspectives. New York: Guilford, pp. 191–210.Google Scholar

Bornstein, R. F. and Masling, J. 1985. “Orality and latency of volunteering to serve as experimental subjects: a replication,” Journal of Personality Assessment, 49: 306–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., and Heerden, J. 2004. “The concept of validity,” Psychological Review, 111(4): 1061–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bottome, P. 1939. Alfred Adler, Apostle of Freedom. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, trans. Nice, R., London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bower, G. 1981. “Mood and memory,” American Psychologist, 36: 129–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bowers, K. S. and Farvolden, P. 1996. “Revisiting a century-old Freudian slip: from suggestion disavowed to the truth repressed,” Psychological Bulletin, 119: 355–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowlby, J. 1946. Forty-four Juvenile Thieves: Their Characters and Home Life. Paris: Baillière.Google Scholar

Bowlby, J. 1969. Attachment and Loss, Vol. 1: Attachment. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Bowlby, J. 1973. Attachment and Loss, Vol. 2: Separation: Anxiety and Anger. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Boyer, P. 2001. Religion Explained: The Human Instincts that Fashion Gods. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar

Brabeck, M. and Brown, L. 1997. “Feminist theory and psychological practice,” in Worell, J. and Johnson, N. (eds.), Shaping the Future of Feminist Psychology: Education, Research and Practice. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 15–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brady, M. J., Peterman, A. H., Fitchett, G., Mo, M., and Cella, D. 1999. “A case for including spirituality in quality of life measurement in oncology,” Psycho-oncology, 8: 417–28.3.0.CO;2-4>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Breuer, J. and Freud, S. [1895] 1960. Studies in Hysteria. Oxford: Beacon.Google Scholar

Brieger, P. and Marneros, A. 1997. “Dysthymia and cyclothymia: historical origins and contemporary development,” Journal of Affective Disorders, 45(3): 117–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brim, O. G. 1958. “Family structure and sex role learning by children: a further analysis of Helen Koch's data,” Sociometry, 21: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brizendine, L. 2006. The Female Brain. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Brody, H. 1987. Stories of Sickness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Bromley, D. G. 1988. Falling from the Faith: Causes and Consequences of Religious Apostasy. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Broughton, J. M. and Freeman-Moir, D. J. 1982. The Cognitive Developmental Psychology of James Mark Baldwin: Current Theory and Research in Genetic Epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar

Brown, D. E. 1991. Human Universals. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Bruner, J. 1973. Going Beyond the Information Given. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Bruner, J. 1986. Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Bruner, J. 1987. “Life as narrative,” Social Research 54(1): 11–32.Google Scholar

Bugental, J. F. T. 1963. “Humanistic psychology: a new breakthrough,” American Psychologist, 18: 563–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bullock, T. H. 1958. “Evolution of neurophysiological mechanisms,” in Roe, A. and Simpson, G. G. (eds.), pp. 165–77.

Burghardt, G. M. 1984. “On the origins of play,” in Smith, P. K. (ed.), Play in Animals and Humans. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 5–41.Google Scholar

Burghardt, G. M. 2005. The Genesis of Animal Play: Testing the Limits. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Burnet, J. 1920. Early Greek Philosophy, 3rd edn. London: A. & C. Black.Google Scholar

Buss, A. 1988. Personality: Evolutionary Heritage and Human Distinctiveness. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Buss, A. and Plomin, R. 1975. A Temperament Theory of Personality Development. New York: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar

Buss, D. M. 1985. “Human mate selection,” American Scientist, 73: 47–51.Google Scholar

Buss, D. M. 1995. “Psychological sex differences: origins through sexual selection,” American Psychologist, 50(3): 164–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Buss, D. M. 1996. “Paternity uncertainty and the complex repertoire of human mating strategies,” American Psychologist, 51(2): 161–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buss, D. M. 1999. “Human nature and individual differences,” in Pervin, L. A. and John, O. P. (eds.), pp. 31–56.

Buss, D. M. and Schmitt, D. P. 1993. “Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating,” Psychological Review, 100:, 204–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Buss, D. M., Shackelford, T. K., Choe, J., Buunk, B. P., and Dijkstra, P. 2000. “Distress about mating rivals,” Personal Relationships, 7(3): 235–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butcher, J. N. (ed.) 1996. International Adaptations of the MMPI-2: Research and Clinical Applications. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

Butler, R. A. 1957. “The effect of deprivation of visual incentives on visual exploration in monkeys,” Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 50: 177–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Butler, R. A. and Alexander, H. M. 1955. “Daily patterns of visual exploratory behavior in the monkey,” Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 48: 247–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cacioppo, J. T., Hawkley, L. C., Rickett, E. M., and Masi, C. M. 2005. “Sociality, spirituality, and meaning making: Chicago health, aging, and social relations studies,” Review of General Psychology, 9(2): 143–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cairns, R. B. 1994. “The making of a developmental science: the contributions and intellectual heritage of James Mark Baldwin,” in Parke, R. D., Ornstein, P. A, Rieser, J. J., and Zahn-Waxler, C. (eds.), pp. 127–43.

Campbell, D. T. and Fiske, D. W. 1959. “Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait–multimethod matrix,” Psychological Bulletin, 56: 81–105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Campbell, J. [1968] 1991. The Masks of God: Primitive Mythology, Vol. 1; Oriental Mythology, Vol. 2; Occidental Mythology, Vol. 3; Creative Mythology, Vol. 4. New York: Viking.Google Scholar

Cannon, W. B. 1927. “The James–Lange theory of emotions: a critical examination and an alternative theory,” American Journal of Psychology, 39: 106–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cantor, N. F. 1993. The Civilization of the Middle Ages, rev. edn. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar

Caprara, G. V. and Cervone, D. 2000. Personality: Determinants, Dynamics, and Potentials. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carlson, N. R. 1998. Physiology of Behavior. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar

Carmichael, C. M. and McGue, M. 1994. “A longitudinal family study of personality change and stability,” Journal of Personality, 62: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Carson, A. 2008. Personal communication.

Caspi, A. and Roberts, B. W. 1999. “Personality continuity and change across the life course,” in Pervin, L. A. and John, O. P. (eds.), pp. 300–26

Caspi, A. and Silva, P. A. 1995. “Temperamental qualities at age 3 predict personality traits in young adulthood: longitudinal evidence from a birth cohort,” Child Development, 66: 486–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cassidy, S. B. and Driscoll, D. J. 2009. “Prader–Willi syndrome,” European Journal of Human Genetics, 17: 3–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cattell, R. B. 1943. “The measurement of adult intelligence,” Psychological Bulletin, 40: 153–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cattell, R. B. 1950. Personality: A Systematic, Theoretical, and Factual Study. New York: McGraw-Hill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cattell, R. B. 1952. Factor Analysis: An Introduction and Manual for the Psychologist and Social Scientist. New York: Harper.Google Scholar

Cattell, R. B. 1965. The Scientific Analysis of Personality. Hammondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Cattell, R. B. 1971. Abilities: Their Structure, Growth and Action. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Caussade, J-P. de [1751] 2001. Abandonment to Divine Providence. Grand Rapids, MI: Christian Classics Ethereal Library.Google Scholar

Champagne, F. A. and Curley, J. P. 2005. “How social experiences influence the brain,” Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 15(6): 704–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chandrasekhar, S. 1985. Ellipsoidal Figures of Equilibrium. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Charmaz, K. 1995. “Grounded theory,” in Smith, J. A., Harré, R., and Langenhove, L. (eds.), Rethinking Methods in Psychology. London: Sage, pp. 27–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chaucer, G. [1386] 1990. The Canterbury Tales, in Encyclopædia Britannica edn., Great Books of the Western World. University of Chicago Press, vol. 19, pp. 275–476.Google Scholar

Cheng, A. T. A. 2001. “Case definition and culture: are people all the same?,” British Journal of Psychiatry, 179: 1–3. Available at: http://bjp.rcpsych.org/cgi/reprint/179/1/1.pdf, accessed July 13, 2008.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chodoff, P., Friedman, P. B., and Hamburg, D. A. 1964. “Stress, defenses and coping behavior: observations in parents of children with malignant disease,” American Journal of Psychiatry, 120: 743–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chodorow, N. 1978. The Reproduction of Mothering: Psychoanalysis and the Sociology of Gender. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Christopherson, E. R. 1989. “Injury control,” American Psychologist, 44: 237–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Churchland, P. M., and Churchland, P. S. 1998. “Recent work on consciousness: philosophical, theoretical, and empirical,” in On the Contrary: Critical Essays, 1987–1997. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Churchland, P. S. 1996. “The hornswoggle problem,” Journal of Consciousness Studies, 3: 402–8.Google Scholar

Cicchetti, D. and Barnett, D. 1991. “Attachment organization in maltreated preschoolers,” Development and Psychopathology, 3: 397–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, L. A. and Watson, D. 1999. “Temperament: a new paradigm for trait psychology,” in Pervin, L. A. and John, O. P. (eds.), pp. 399–423.

Clark, M. S. and Isen, A. M. 1982. “Toward understanding the relationship between feeling states and social behavior,” in Hastorf, A. H. and Isen, A. M. (eds.), Cognitive Social Psychology. New York: Elsevier, pp. 73–108.Google Scholar

Cloninger, C. R. 2004a. Feeling Good: The Science of Well-being. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cloninger, C. R. 2004b. The Biological Sciences of the West and the Psychology of the East: An Integrated Approach to Psychotherapy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cloninger, C. R, Adolfsson, R., and Svrakic, N. M. 1996. “Mapping genes for human personality,” Nature Genetics, 12: 3–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cloninger, C. R., Svrakic, D. M., and Przybeck, T. R. 1993. “A psychobiological model of temperament and character,” Archives of General Psychiatry, 50: 975–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cloninger, S. C. 1996. Personality: Description, Dynamics, and Development. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar

Cohen, R. J., Montague, P., Nathanson, L. S., and Swerdlik, M. E. 1988. Psychological Testing: An Introduction to Tests and Measurement. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.Google Scholar

Cole, M. 1991. “Conclusion,” in Resnick, L. B., Levine, J. M., and Teasley, S. D. (eds.), pp. 398–417.

Coleman, J. C., Butcher, J. N., and Carson, C. 1984. Abnormal Psychology and Modern Life, 7th edn. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.Google Scholar

Colvin, C. R. and Brown, J. D. 1994. “Do positive illusions foster mental health? An examination of the Taylor and Brown formulation,” Psychological Bulletin, 116(1): 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Colvin, C. R., Brown, J. D., and Funder, D. C. 1995. “Overly positive self-evaluations and personality: negative implications for mental health,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(6): 1152–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cooley, C. H. [1902] 1922. Human Nature and the Social Order, rev. edn. New York: Charles Scribner and Sons.Google Scholar

Corsini, R. J. 1997. Personal communication.

Corsini, R. J. 1999. The Dictionary of Psychology. Philadelphia, PA: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar

Corsini, R. J. 2000. “Introduction,” in Corsini, R. J. and Wedding, D. (eds.), Current Psychotherapies, 6th edn. Itasca, IL: F. E. Peacock, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar

Corsini, R. J. 2002. Personal communication.

Cosmides, L. and Tooby, J. 1999. “Toward an evolutionary taxonomy of treatable conditions,” Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 108: 453–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Costa, Jr., P. T. and McCrae, R. R. 1985. The NEO Personality Inventory Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, p. 2.Google Scholar

Costa, Jr., P. T. and McCrae, R. R. 1988. “Personality in adulthood: a six-year longitudinal study of self reports and spousal ratings on the NEO Personality Inventory,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54: 853–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Costa, Jr., P. T. and McCrae, R. R. 1989. “Personality continuity and the changes of adult life,” in Storandt, M. and VandenBos, G. R. (eds.), The Adult Years: Continuity and Change. Washington DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 5–77.Google Scholar

Costa, Jr., P. T. and McCrae, R. R. 1992. Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar

Crago, M. B. 1988. “Cultural context in communicative interaction of Inuit children,” Ph.D. thesis, School of Human Communication Disorders, McGill University.

Crandall, B. F. and Spence, M. A. 1974. “Linkage relations of the phenylcarbamide locus,” Human Heredity, 24: 247–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cronbach, L. J. 1980. “Validity on parole: how can we go straight?,” New Directions for Testing and Measurement, 5: 99–108.Google Scholar

Cronbach, L. J. and Meehl, P. E. 1955. “Construct validity in psychological tests,” Psychological Bulletin, 52: 281–302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cross, S. E. and Markus, H. R. 1999. “The cultural constitution of personality,” in Pervin, L. A. and John, O. P. (eds.), pp. 378–96.

Crowne, D. P. and Marlowe, D. 1964. The Approval Motive. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Csikszentmihalyi, M. 1991. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar

Cummings, N. A. 2005. “Expanding a shrinking economic base: the right way, the wrong way, and the mental health way,” in Wright, R. H. and Cummings, N. A. (eds.), Destructive Trends in Mental Health: The Well-intentioned Path to Harm. New York: Routledge, pp. 87–111.Google Scholar

Cunningham, K. A. and Napier, T. C. 2008. “Anne Elizabeth Kelley (1954–2007),” American Psychologist, 63(7): 615–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cushman, P. 1992. “Psychotherapy to 1992: a historically situated interpretation,” in Freedheim, D. K. (ed.), History of Psychotherapy: A Century of Change. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 21–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cushman, P. 1995. Constructing the Self, Constructing America. New York: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Damasio, A. R. 1994. Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York: Avon Books.Google Scholar

Damasio, A. R. 1999. The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness. New York: Harcourt.Google Scholar

Damasio, A. R. 2000. “A neurobiology for consciousness,” in Metzinger, T. (ed.), Neural Correlates of Consciousness: Empirical and Conceptual Questions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 111–20.Google Scholar

Damasio, A. 2003. Looking for Spinoza: Joy, Sorrow, and the Feeling Brain. Toronto: Harvest/Harcourt.Google Scholar

Damasio, H., Grabowski, T., Frank, R., Galaburda, A. M., and Damasio, A. R. 1994. “The return of Phineas Gage: the skull of a famous patient yields clues about the brain,” Science, 264:, 1102–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Danziger, K. 1997. Naming the Mind: How Psychology found its Language. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Darwin, C. [1872] 1965. The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Darwin, C. [1872] 1972. The Descent of Man, Selection in Relation to Sex. New York: D. Appleton.Google Scholar

Davies, M., Stankov, L., and Roberts, R. D. 1998. “Emotional intelligence: in search of an elusive construct,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(4): 989–1015.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Davies, P. 1992. The Mind of God: The Scientific Basis for a Rational World. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Dawes, R. M. 1993. “Prediction of the future versus an understanding of the past: a basic asymmetry,” American Journal of Psychology, 106: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dawes, R. M. 1994. House of Cards: Psychology and Psychotherapy Built on Myth. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Dawkins, R. [1976] 2006. The Selfish Gene. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Day, H. 1971. “The measurement of specific curiosity,” in Day, H., Berlyne, D., and Hunt, D. (eds.), Intrinsic Motivation: A New Direction in Education. Toronto: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, pp. 99–112.Google Scholar

Day, H. 1982. “Curiosity and the interested explorer,” Performance and Instruction, 21: 19–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deary, I. J., Thorpe, G., Wilson, V., Starr, J. M., and Whalley, L. J. 2003. “Population sex differences in IQ at age 11: the Scottish mental survey 1932,” Intelligence, 31(6): 533–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deaux, K. and LaFrance, M. 1998. “Gender,” in Gilbert, D. T. and Fiske, S. T. (eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology, 4th edn. New York: McGraw-Hill, vol. 2, pp. 788–827.Google Scholar

Delgado, J. M. R. 1963. “Cerebral heterostimulation in a monkey colony,” Science, 141(whole No. 3576): 161–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Delgado, J. M. R. 2000. “Neuronal imprinting of human values,” International Journal of Psychophysiology, 35(2–3): 237–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dellas, M. and Gaier, E. L. 1970. “Identification of creativity: the individual,” Psychological Bulletin, 73: 55–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dennett, D. 1991. Consciousness Explained. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.Google Scholar

Dewsbury, D. A. 1978. “What is (was?) the ‘Fixed Action Pattern?’,” Animal Behaviour, 26: 310–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diamond, J. 1993. The Third Chimpanzee: The Evolution and Future of the Human Animal. New York: HarperPerennial.Google Scholar

Diamond, L. M. 1998. “Development of sexual orientation among adolescent and young adult women,” Developmental Psychology, 34: 1085–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Diamond, L. M. 2003. “What does sexual orientation orient? A behavioral model distinguishing romantic love and sexual desire,” Psychological Review, 110: 173–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diamond, S. 1957. Personality and Temperament. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Didion, J. 2005. The Year of Magical Thinking. London: Fourth Estate.Google Scholar

Digman, J. M. 1997. “Higher-order factors of the Big Five,” Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 73: 1246–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Digman, J. M. and Takemoto-Chock, N. K. 1981. “Factors in the natural language of personality: reanalysis and comparison of six major studies,” Multivariate Behavioral Research, 16: 149–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dinesen, I. (transcribed by Schimpf, David, available at: cw.mariancollege.edu/dschimpf/keylinesfrombabettesfeast.htm, accessed November 19, 2005) www.press.uchicago.edu/Misc/Chicago/243230.html#copyright.

Dobzhansky, T. 1964. Heredity and the Nature of Man. New York: New American Library.Google Scholar

Dodge, R. 1931. Conditions and Consequences of Human Variability. New Haven, CT: Yale Univesity Press.Google Scholar

Dostoevsky, F. [1864] 1993. Notes from Underground, trans. Pevear, R. and Volokhonsky, L.. New York: Vintage Classics.Google Scholar

Draper, T. W. 1995. “Canine analogs of human personality factors,” Journal of General Psychology, 122: 241–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dreikurs, R. 1950. Fundamentals of Adlerian Psychology. Chicago, IL: Alfred Adler Institute.Google Scholar

Drewery, W., Winslade, J., and Monk, G. 2000. “Resisting the dominating story: toward a deeper understanding of narrative therapy,” in Neimeyer, R. A. (ed.), pp. 243–63.

Dumont, F. 1991. “Expertise in psychotherapy: inherent liabilities of becoming experienced,” Psychotherapy: Theory/Research/Practice and Training, 28(3): 422–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dumont, F. 1993. “Inferential heuristics in clinical problem formulation: selective review of their strengths and weaknesses,” Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 24: 196–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dumont, F. 2000. “Personality theory,” in Borgatta, E. F., and Montgomery, R. J. V. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Sociology, 2nd edn. New York: Macmillan Reference, vol. 3, pp. 2082–90.Google Scholar

Dumont, F. 2005. “The biological sciences of the West and the monistic psychology of the East: A modern synthesis. Critique of ‘Feeling Good: The Science of Well-Being,’ by C. Robert Cloninger,” PsycCRITIQUES: Contemporary Psychology: APA Review of Books, pp. 1–8 in e-version, January 27.

Dumont, F. and Carson, A. 1995. “Precursors of vocational psychology in ancient civilizations,” Journal of Counseling and Development, 73(4): 371–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dumont, F. and Fitzpatrick, M. 2001. “The real relationship: schemas, stereotypes, and personal history,” Psychotherapy: Theory/Research/Practice and Training, 38: 12–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dumont, F. and Smith, D. 1996. “Projectives and their infirm research base,” Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 27: 419–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunn, J. and Plomin, R. 1990. Separate Lives: Why Siblings are so Different. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Dupré, J. 2000. “The fight for science and reason,” The Sciences, 40(2): 40–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Durham, W. H. C. 1991. Co-evolution: Genes, Culture and Human Diversity. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Dwairy, M. and Sickle, T. D. 1996. “Western psychotherapy in traditional Arabic societies,” Clinical Psychology Review, 16(3): 231–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eagly, A. H. 1987. Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Social Role Interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Eagly, A. H. 1995. “The science and politics of comparing women and men,” American Psychologist, 50: 145–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eagly, A. H. 1996. “Differences between women and men: their magnitude, practical importance, and political meaning,” American Psychologist, 51(2): 158–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eagly, A. H. 1997. “Sex differences in social behavior: comparing social role theory and evolutionary psychology,” American Psychologist, 52(12): 1380–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Eagly, A. H. and Wood, W. 1999. “The origins of sex differences in human behavior: evolved dispositions versus social roles,” American Psychologist, 54(6): 408–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Economist, The 2008. “Your call is important to us,” p. 14, March 8.

Edelman, G. M. 1992. Bright Air, Brilliant Fire. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Edelman, G. M. and Tononi, G. 2000. A Universe of Consciousness: How Matter Becomes Imagination. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Edwards, A. L. 1990. Edwards Personality Inventory: R, rev. edn. Seattle, WA: Author.Google Scholar

Egeland, B. R., Carlson, E., and Sroufe, L. A. 1993. “Resilience as process,” Development & Psychopathology, 5(4): 517–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ehrlich, E. 2000. You've got Ketchup on your Muumuu. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar

Eidelson, R. J. and Eidelson, J. I. 2003. “Dangerous ideas: five beliefs that propel groups toward conflict,” American Psychologist, 58: 182–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ekman, P. 1973. Darwin and Facial Expression. A Century of Research in Review. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Ekman, P. 1984. “Expression and nature of emotion,” in Scherer, K. and Ekman, P. (eds.), Approaches to Emotion. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 319–43.Google Scholar

Ekman, P. and Davidson, R. J. 1994. The Nature of Emotion: Fundamental Questions. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Ekman, P., Friesen, W. V., and Ellsworth, P. 1972. Emotion in the Human Face. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar

Eldredge, N. and Gould, S. J. 1972. “Punctuated equilibria: an alternative to phyletic gradualism,” in Schopf, T. J. (ed.), Models in Paleobiology. San Francisco, CA: Freeman, Cooper, pp. 82–115.Google Scholar

Eldredge, N. and Tattersall, I. 1982. The Myths of Human Evolution. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Elkins, D. N. 2001. “Beyond religion: toward a humanistic spirituality,” in Schneider, K. G., Bugental, J. T., and Pierson, J. F. (eds.), The Handbook of Humanistic Psychology: Leading Edges in Theory, Research, & Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 201–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellenberger, H. F. 1958. “A clinical introduction to psychiatric phenomenology and existential analysis,” in May, R., Angel, E., and Ellenberger, H. F. (eds.), Existence. New York: Basic Books, pp. 92–194.Google Scholar

Ellenberger, H. F. 1970. The Discovery of the Unconscious: The History and Evolution of Dynamic Psychiatry. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Elwell, F. 1996. Verstehen: Max Weber's HomePage, July 16, 2001, accessed September 8, 2008 http://www.faculty.rsu.edu/~felwell/Theorists/Weber/Whome.htm.

Emmerich, W. 1959. “Parental identification in young children,” Genetic Psychology Monographs, 1959, 60: 257–308.Google ScholarPubMed

Emmons, R. A. and McCullough, M. E. (eds.) 1999. “Religion in the psychology of personality,” Journal of Personality, 67(6): whole issue.

Emmons, R. A., and Paloutzian, R. F. 2003. “The psychology of religion,” in Fiske, S. T., Schacter, D. L., and Zahn-Waxler, C. (eds.), Annual Review of Psychology. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews, pp. 377–402.Google Scholar

Erikson, E. H. 1963. Childhood and Society. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Erikson, E. H. 1969. “Growth and crises of the healthy personality,” in Chiang, H-M. and Maslow, A. H. (eds.), The Healthy Personality: Readings. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, pp. 30–34.Google Scholar

Exner, J. E. 2002. The Rorschach: Basic Foundations and Principles of Interpretation: Vol. 1. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar

Eysenck, H. J. 1967. The Biological Basis of Personality. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar

Eysenck, H. J. 1970. The Structure of Personality. London: Metheun.Google Scholar

Eysenck, H. J. 1976. Sex and Personality. London: Open Books.Google Scholar

Eysenck, H. J. 1978. “An exercise in mega-silliness,” American Psychologist, 33: 517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eysenck, H. J. 1979. The Nature and Measurement of Intelligence. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Eysenck, H. J. 1990a. “Biological dimensions of personality,” in Pervin, L. A. (ed.), Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research. New York: Guilford, pp. 244–76.Google Scholar

Eysenck, H. J. 1990b. “Genetic and environmental contributions to individual differences: the three major dimensions of personality,” Journal of Personality, 58: 245–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Eysenck, H. J. 1993. “From DNA to social behaviour: conditions for a paradigm of personality research,” in Hettema, J. and Deary, I. J. (eds.), Foundations of Personality. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, pp. 55–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eysenck, H. J. 1995. Genius: The Natural History of Creativity. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eysenck, H. J. and Eysenck, M. W. 1985. Personality and Individual Differences. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eysenck, H. J. and Eysenck, S. B. G. 1968. Eysenck Personality Inventory. San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Service.Google Scholar

Eysenck, H. J. and Eysenck, S. B. G. 1975. Manual of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Service.Google Scholar

Fagen, R. M. 1981. Animal Play Behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fagot, B. I. 1991. “Peer relations in boys and girls from two to seven,” Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Seattle, WA.

Farley, F. 2000. “Hans Eysenck (1916–1997),” American Psychologist, 55(6): 674–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fausto-Sterling, A. 2000. “The five sexes, revisited,” The Sciences. The New York Academy of Sciences, 40(4): July/August, 18–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Featherman, D. L. 1983. “Life-span perspectives in social science research,” in Baltes, P. B. and Brim, O. G., Jr. (eds.), Life-span Development and Behavior. New York: Academic Press, vol. 5, pp. 1–57.Google Scholar

Feingold, A. 1992. “Sex differences in variability in intellectual abilities: a new look at an old controversy,” Review of Educational Research, 62: 61–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feingold, A. 1994. “The additive effects of group differences in central tendency and variability are important in distributional comparisons between groups,” American Psychologist, 50: 5–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feltham, C. 2007. What's Wrong with Us? The Anthropathology Thesis. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar

Ferreira, A. J. 1965. “Emotional factors in prenatal environment: a review,” Journal of Nervous and Mental Disorders, 141: 108–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Festinger, L. 1957. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.Google Scholar

Feynman, R. P. 1974. Cargo Cult Science: Caltech Commencement Address, available at: http://www.softpanorama.org/Skeptics/IT_skeptic/cargo_cult_programming.shtml.

Fischer, G. H. and Molenaar, I. W. 1995. Rasch Models: Foundations, Recent Developments, and Applications. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fiske, D. W. 1949. “Consistency of the factorial structures of personality ratings from different sources,” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 44: 329–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fiske, S. T. 1993. “Controlling other people: the impact of stereotyping on power,” American Psychologist, 48: 621–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fitch, W. T. 2005. “The evolution of music in comparative perspective,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1060(1): 29–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Forgas, J. P. 1990. “Affective influences on individual and group judgments,” European Journal of Social Psychology, 20: 441–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foucault, M. 1980. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and other Writings. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. [1965] 1988a. Madness and Civilization: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. 1988b. The Final Foucault. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Frankl, V. E. 1959. Man's Search for Meaning: An Introduction to Logotherapy. New York: Washington Square Press.Google Scholar

Frankl, V. E. 1965. The Doctor and the Soul. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar

Frankl, V. E. 1970. “Forerunner of existential psychiatry,” Journal of Individual Psychology, 26: 10–16.Google Scholar

Franklin, M. B. 2001. “The artist speaks: Sigmund Koch on aesthetics and creative works,” American Psychologist, 56: 445–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frederiksen, N. 1965. “Response set scores as predictors of performance,” Personnel Psychology, 18: 225–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freud, S. [1932] 1952. New Introductory Lectures on Psycho-Analysis, trans. Sprott, W. J. H., in Encyclopædia Britannica edn., Great Books of the Western World. University of Chicago Press, vol. 54.Google Scholar

Freud, S. [1905] 1953a. Three Essays on Sexuality. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud: Vol. VII, trans. and ed. Strachey, J.. London: Hogarth.Google Scholar

Freud, S. [1905] 1953b. The Case of Little Hans. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud: Vol. VII, trans. and ed. Strachey, J.. London: Hogarth.Google Scholar

Freud, S. 1955. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud: Vol. II, trans. and ed. Strachey, J.. London: Hogarth.Google Scholar

Freud, S. [1925] 1959. An Autobiographical Study. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud: Vol. XX, trans. and ed. Strachey, J.. London: Hogarth Press, pp. 7–74.Google Scholar

Freud, S. [1930] 1961. Civilization and its Discontents. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud: Vol. XXI. London: Hogarth, pp. 59–145.Google Scholar

Freud, S. [1931] 1962. Female Sexuality. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud: Vol. XXI, trans. and ed. Strachey, J.. London: Hogarth.Google Scholar

Freud, S. [1928] 1964. The Future of an Illusion. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar

Frodi, A., Macaulay, J., and Thorne, P. R. 1977. “Are women always less aggressive than men? A review of the experimental literature,” Psychological Bulletin, 84(4): 634–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fromm, E. 1947. Man for Himself. New York: Rinehart.Google Scholar

Frye, N. 1992. Power of Words: Being a Second Study of the Bible and Literature. Toronto: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Gallup, 2007. Questions and answers about Americans' religion, available at: http://www.gallup.com/poll/103459/Questions-Answers-About-Americans-Religion.aspx.

Gallup, G. G. 1970. “Chimpanzees: self-recognition,” Science, 167: 86–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gallup, G. G. 1977. “Self-recognition in primates: a comparative approach to the bidirectional properties of consciousness,” American Psychologist, 32: 329–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gantt, W. H. 1966. “Reflexology, schizokinesis, and autokinesis,” Conditional Reflex, 1: 57–68.Google Scholar

Garb, H. N. 1998. “Recommendations for training in the use of the thematic apperception test (TAT),” Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 29(6): 621–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gardner, H. 1993. Multiple Intelligences: The Theory in Practice. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Gardner, M. 2000. “Introduction,” in The Annotated Alice, Carroll, L., Alice's Adventures in Wonderland and Through the Looking Glass. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Garmezy, N. 1983. “Stressors of childhood,” in Garmezy, N. and Rutter, M. (eds.), Stress, Coping and Development in Children. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Garrison, A. 1997. “Adaptationism, mental health, and therapeutic outcome,” Psychotherapy, 34(2): 107–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gazzaniga, M. S. 1997. “What are brains for?,” in Solso, R. L. (ed.), Mind and Brain Sciences in the 21st Century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 157–71.Google Scholar

Geary, D. C. 1998. Male, Female: The Evolution of Human Sex Differences. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gentry, T. A., Polzine, K. M., and Wakefield, J. A. 1985. “Human genetic markers associated with variation in intellectual abilities and personality,” Personality & Individual Differences, 16(1): 111–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gesell, A. 1954. “The ontogenesis of infant behavior,” in Carmichael, L. (ed.), Manual of Child Psychology, 2nd edn. New York: Wiley, pp. 335–73.Google Scholar

Gieser, L. and Stein, M. I. (eds.) 1999. Evocative Images: The Thematic Apperception Test and the Art of Projection. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRef

Gigerenzer, G. 1991. “From tools to theories: a heuristic of discovery in cognitive psychology,” Psychological Review, 98(2): 254–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilligan, C. 1982. In a Different Voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Gilligan, S. G. and Bower, G. H. 1984. “Cognitive consequences of emotional arousal,” in Izard, C., Kagan, J., and Zajonc, R. (eds.), Emotions, Cognition, and Behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 547–88.Google Scholar

Glass, G. V, McGraw, B., and Smith, M. L. 1981. Meta-analysis in Social Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Gleitman, H. 1996. Basic Psychology, 4th edn. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Glenn, C. G., Driscoll, D. J., Thomas, P. Y., and Nicholls, R. D. 1997. “Genomic imprinting: potential function and mechanisms revealed by the Prader–Willi and Angelman syndromes,” Molecular Human Reproduction, 3: 321–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Glover, D. and Gatos, A. 2001. “Chimp researcher is the Martha Stewart of the jungle,” The Saturday Post. Toronto, November 3.Google Scholar

Goethe, J. W. von [1832] 1952. Faust: Parts One and Two. Chicago, IL: Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc.Google Scholar

Golby, A. J., Gabrieli, J. D. E., Chiao, J. Y., and Eberhardt, J. L. 2001. “Differential responses in the fusiform region to same-race and other-race faces,” Nature Neuroscience, 4: 845–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Goldberg, L. R. 1990. “An alternative ‘description of personality’: the structure of phenotypic personality traits. The Big-Five factor structure,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59: 1216–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldberg, L. R. 1993. “The structure of phenotypic personality traits,” American Psychologist, 48: 26–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Goldschmidt, R. 1933. “Some aspects of evolution,” Science, 78: 539–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldsmith, H. H., Buss, K. A., and Lemery, K. S. 1997. “Toddler and childhood temperament: expanded content, stronger genetic evidence, new evidence for the importance of environment,” Developmental Psychology, 33: 891–905.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Goldstein, K. 1939. The Organism: A Holistic Approach to Biology Derived from Pathological Data in Man. New York: American Book Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldstone, A. P. 2004. “Prader–Willi syndrome: advances in genetics, pathophysiology, and treatment,” Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism, 15(1): 12–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Goleman, D. 1995. Emotional Intelligence: Why it can Matter more than IQ. New York: Bantam.Google Scholar

Goodall, J. 1986. The Chimpanzees of Gombe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Gould, S. J. 1977a. Ever since Darwin. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Gould, S. J. 1977b. Ontogeny and Phylogeny. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Gould, S. J. 1981. The Mismeasure of Man. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Gould, S. J. and Eldredge, N. 1977. “Punctuated equilibria: the tempo and mode of evolution reconsidered,” Paleobiology, 3: 115–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grawe, K. 2007. Neuropsychotherapy: How the Neurosciences Inform Effective Psychotherapy. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Gray, J. A. 1982. The Neuropsychology of Anxiety: An Enquiry into the Functions of the Septal-hippocampal System. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Greenberg, L. 1993. “Emotion and change processes in psychotherapy,” in Lewis, M. and Haviland-Jones, J. (eds.), Handbook of Emotions. New York: Guilford, pp. 499–508.Google Scholar

Greenberg, L. S. and Safran, J. D. 1987. Emotion in Psychotherapy: Affect, Cognition, and the Process of Change. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Greenberg, L. and Safran, J. 1989. “Emotion in psychotherapy,” American Psychologist, 44: 19–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Greenhalgh, T. and Hurwitz, B. 1998. Narrative-based Medicine. London: BMJ Books.Google Scholar

Gross, J. J. 1999. “Emotion and emotion regulation,” in Pervin, L. A. and John, O. P. (eds.), pp. 525–52.

Guilford, J. P. 1956. “The structure of intellect,” Psychological Bulletin, 53: 267–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Guilford, J. P. 1959. “Three faces of intellect,” American Psychologist, 14: 469–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Güntürkün, O. 2006. “Letters on nature and nurture,” in Baltes, P. B., Reuter-Lorenz, P. A., and Rösler, F. (eds.), pp. 379–97.

Gupta, U. and Singh, P. 1982. “Exploratory studies in love and liking and types of marriage,” Indian Journal of Applied Psychology, 19(2): 92–97.Google Scholar

Gustafsson, J. E. and Undheim, J. O. 1996. “Individual differences in cognitive functions,” in Berliner, D. C. and Calfee, R. C. (eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology. New York: Macmillan Library Reference, pp. 186–242.Google Scholar

Gutmann, D. L. 1987. Reclaimed Powers: Toward a New Psychology of Men and Women in Later Life. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Hall, C. S., Lindzey, G., and Campbell, J. B. 1998. Theories of Personality. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Hall, E. T. 1966. The Hidden Dimension. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar

Hall, E. T. 1969. The Silent Language. Greenwich, CT: Fawcett.Google Scholar

Hall, G. S. 1922. Senescence: The Last Half of Life. New York: Appleton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halpern, D. F. 1994. “Stereotypes, science, censorship, and the study of sex differences,” (Special issue). Feminism and Psychology, 4: 523–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halpern, D. F. 1997. “Sex differences in intelligence: implications for education,” American Psychologist, 52(10): 1091–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hamilton, E. 1957. The Echo of Greece. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Hamilton, E. [1958] 1993. The Greek Way. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Hare-Mustin, R. T. and Marecek, J. 1988. “The meaning of difference: gender theory, postmodernism, and psychology,” American Psychologist, 43(6): 455–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hare-Mustin, R. T. and Marecek, J. 1989. “Thinking about postmodernism and gender theory,” American Psychologist, 44(10): 1333–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harlow, H. F. 1950. “Learning and satiation of response in intrinsically motivated complex puzzle performance in monkeys,” Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 43: 289–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Harlow, H. F. 1958. “The nature of love,” American Psychologist, 13: 673–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harlow, H. F. 1959. “Love in infant monkeys,” Scientific American, 200(6): 68–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Harlow, H. F. and Harlow, M. K. 1962. “Social deprivation in monkeys,” Scientific American, 207: 136–46.Google ScholarPubMed

Harlow, H. F. and Harlow, M. K. 1966. “Learning to love,” American Scientist, 54: 244–72.Google ScholarPubMed

Harlow, H. F. and Harlow, M. K. 1969. “Effects of various mother–infant relationships on Rhesus monkey behaviors,” in Foss, B. M. (ed.), Determinants of Infant Behaviour. London: Methuen, vol. 4, pp. 15–36.Google Scholar

Harlow, H. F., Harlow, M. K., and Meyer, D. I. 1950. “Learning motivated by a manipulation drive,” Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40: 228–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Harré, R. 1984. Personal Being: A Theory for Individual Psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Hart, D. and Karmel, M. P. 1996. “Self-awareness and self-knowledge in humans, apes, and monkeys,” in Russon, A. E., Bard, K. A., and Parker, S. T. (eds.), Reaching into Thought: The Minds of the Great Apes. Cambridge University Press, pp. 325–47.Google Scholar

Hartley, R. E. 1959. “Sex-role pressures and socialization of the male child,” Psychological Reports, 5: 457–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hartley, R. E. 1960. “Children's concepts of male and female roles,” Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 6: 83–91.Google Scholar

Hartshorne, H. and May, M. A. 1928. Studies in the Nature of Character: Vol. 1. Studies in Deceit. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Hartshorne, H. and May, M. A. 1929. Studies in the Nature of Character: Vol. 2. Studies in Service and Self-control. New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hatano, G. and Inagaki, K. 1991. “Sharing cognition through collective comprehension activity,” in Resnick, L. B., Levine, J. M., and Teasley, S. D. (eds.), pp. 331–48.

Hatfield, E., Caccioppo, J. T., and Rapson, R. L. 1994. Emotional Contagion. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Havens, L. L. 1993. “Twentieth century psychiatry: a view from the sea,” American Journal of Psychiatry, 138(10): 1279–87.Google Scholar

Havighurst, R. A. 1973. “History of developmental psychology: socialization and personality development through the life span,” in Baltes, P. B. and Schaie, K. W. (eds.), Life-span Developmental Psychology: Personality and Socialization. New York: Academic Press, pp. 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heatherton, T. F. and Nichols, P. A. 1994. “Conceptual issues in assessing whether personality can change,” in Heatherton, T. F. and Weinberger, J. L. (eds.), pp. 3–18.

Heatherton, T. F. and Weinberger, J. L (eds.) 1994. Can Personality Change?Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRef

Hebb, D. O. 1949. The Organization of Behavior: A Neuropsychological Theory. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Heidbreder, E. 1933. Seven Psychologies. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar

Helgesen, S. 1990. The Female Advantage: Women's Ways of Leadership. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar

Helson, R. 1990. “Creativity in women: outer and inner views over time,” in Runco, M. A. and Albert, R. S. (eds.), Theories of Creativity. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 46–58.Google Scholar

Helson, R., Mitchell, V., and Moane, G. 1984. “Personality and patterns of adherence and non-adherence to the social clock,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46: 1079–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Helson, R. and Moane, G. 1987. “Personality change in women from college to mid-life,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53: 176–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Helson, R. and Stewart, A. 1994. “Personality change in adulthood,” in Heatherton, T. F. and Weinberger, J. L. (eds.), pp. 201–25.

Henson, R. K. 2006. “Effect–size measures and meta-analytic thinking in counseling psychology research,” The Counseling Psychologist, 34(5): 601–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hess, E. H. 1959. “Imprinting,” Science, 130: 133–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hess, E. H. 1965. “Attitude and pupil size,” Scientific American, 212(4): 46–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hilgard, E. R. 1987. Psychology in America: A Historical Survey. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovitch.Google Scholar

Hill, P. C. and Hood, Jr., R. W., 1999. Measures of Religiosity. Birmingham, AL: Religious Education Press.Google Scholar

Hill, P. C. and Pargament, K. I. 2003. “Advances in the conceptualization and measurement of religion and spirituality: implications for physical and mental health research,” American Psychologist, 28: 64–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hobbes, T. [1651] 1990. Leviathan, in Encyclopædia Britannica edn., Great Books of the Western World. University of Chicago Press, vol. 21, pp. 41–283.Google Scholar

Hoff, P. 1998. “Emil Kraepelin and forensic psychiatry,” International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 21: 343–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoffman, L. W. 1991. “The influence of the family environment on personality: accounting for sibling differences,” Psychological Bulletin, 11(2): 187–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoffman, L. W., Paris, S., Hall, E., and Schell, R. 1988. Developmental Psychology Today. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Hoffman, M. L. 1981. “Is altruism part of human nature?,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 121–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hollands, J. 2001. Same Game, Different Rules: How to get Ahead without Being a Bully Broad, Ice Queen or Ms. Understood. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Horenczyk, G. 1996. “The actualization balance of ethnic identity,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(4): 836–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horney, K. 1937. The Neurotic Personality of Our Time. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Horney, K. 1939. New Ways in Psychoanalysis. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Horney, K. 1950. Neurosis and Human Growth. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Horney, K. 1967. Feminine Psychology. New York: NortonGoogle Scholar

Huizinga, J. [1938] 1971. Homo Ludens: A Study in the Play-elements in Culture, trans. Hull, R. F. C.. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Hyde, J. S. and Plant, E. A. 1995. “Magnitude of psychological gender differences: another side to the story,” American Psychologist, 50: 159–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hyman, R. B. 1988. “Four stages of adulthood: an exploratory study of growth patterns of inner-direction and time-competence in women,” Journal of Research in Personality, 22: 117–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Illich, I. 1976. Limits to Medicine. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar

Isen, A. M. 1984. “Toward understanding the role of affect in cognition,” in Wyer, R. S. and Srull, T. K. (eds.), Handbook of Social Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, vol. 3, pp. 179–236.Google Scholar

Iwaniuk, A. N., Nelson, J. E., and Pellis, S. M. 2001. “Do big-brained animals play more? Comparative analyses of play and relative brain size in mammals,” Journal of Comparative Psychology, 115: 29–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Izard, C. E. 1992. “Basic emotions, relations among emotions, and emotion– cognition relations,” Psychological Review, 99: 561–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Izard, C. E. 1994. “Innate and universal facial expressions: evidence from developmental and cross-cultural research,” Psychological Bulletin, 115: 288–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Izard, C. E. 2001. “Emotional intelligence or adaptive emotions,” Emotion, 1: 249–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jacklin, C. N. and Maccoby, E. E. 1978. “Social behavior at 33 months in same-sex and mixed-sex dyads,” Child Development, 49: 557–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

James, W. [1892] 1963a. Psychology. Greenwich, CT: Fawcett.Google Scholar

James, W. [1902] 1963b. The Varieties of Religious Experience: A Study in Human Nature. New York: University Books.Google Scholar

James, W. [1890] 1990. The Principles of Psychology, in Encyclopædia Britannica edn., Great Books of the Western World. Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Jaynes, J. 1990. The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Jensen, A. R. [1987] 2003. “Individual differences in the Hick paradigm,” in Vernon, P. (ed.), Speed of Information Processing and Intelligence. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 101–75.Google Scholar

Jilek, W. G. 1995. “Emil Kraepelin and comparative sociocultural psychiatry,” European Archives of Psychiatry & Clinical Neuroscience, 245(4–5): 231–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

John, O. P., Robins, R. W., and Pervin, L. A. 2008. Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, 3rd edn. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar

John, O. P. and Srivasta, S. 1999. “The Big Five trait taxonomy: history, measurement, and theoretical perspectives,” in Pervin, L. A and John, O. P (eds.), pp. 102–38.

Johnson, A. J. and Dunn, T. 2008. “Walking in the valley of the shadow of death,” PsycCRITIQUES, 53(36): article 9.Google Scholar

Jones, E. 1955. The Life and Work of Sigmund Freud. New York. Basic Books, vol. 2.Google Scholar

Jones, M. 1969. Social Psychiatry in Practice: The Idea of the Psychiatric Community. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Jones, M. 1984. “From therapeutic communities to social systems to futurism,” American Journal of Social Psychiatry, 4(2): 5–9.Google Scholar

Jones, S. 1999. Almost like a Whale. London: Black Swan.Google Scholar

Jones, S. 2001. Almost like a Whale: The Origin of Species Updated. London: Black Swan.Google Scholar

Jourard, S. 1971. The Transparent Self, rev. edn. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar

Jung, C. G. 1933. Modern Man in Search of a Soul. New York: Harcourt.Google Scholar

Jung, C. G. 1957. The Undiscovered Self. New York: Mentor Books.Google Scholar

Jung, C. G. [1921] 1971. Psychological Types. Collected Works. Princeton University Press, vol. 6.Google Scholar

Jung, C. G. 2003. Available at: www.quotationspage.com/subjects/creativity.

Kagan, J. 1994. Galen's Dream. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Kagan, J. and Moss, H. A. 1962. Birth to Maturity: A Study in Psychological Development. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kagan, J. and Reznick, J. S. 1986. “Shyness and temperament,” in Jones, W. H, Cheek, J. M, and Briggs, S. R (eds.), Shyness: Perspectives on Research and Treatment. New York: Plenum, pp. 81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahill, S. 1984. “Human figure drawing in adults: an update of the empirical evidence. 1967–1982,” Canadian Psychology, 25: 269–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar