Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T18:32:06.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Alexander, Philosophy and Rome

A Trajanic Moment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 January 2022

Richard Stoneman
Affiliation:
University of Exeter
Get access

Summary

It is greatly tempting to speak of a specifically ‘Trajanic’ moment in Alexander reception, as this is the only moment in Greek literature in which an ‘idealised Greek’ Alexander appears. This chapter concentrates on his unusual figuration as a philosopher by Dio Chrysostom and Plutarch, which is both decisively Hellenocentric and at the same time motivated by Trajan’s own profile as a philhellene who admired Alexander as a military hero. The uniqueness of this image is suggested by contrast with other near-contemporary texts that are decidedly philosophical – those of Musonius Rufus, Epictetus, Pseudo-Diogenes and Maximus of Tyre – but that either ignore Alexander or see him as a philosophical anti-type. Idealising Alexander required opportunity, which I suggest came quickly in the form of Trajan, was seized upon by a couple of experimentalists, and disappeared just as quickly, at least within secular literature.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Asirvatham, S. R. (2001) ‘Olympias’ Snake and Callisthenes’ Stand: Religion and Politics in Plutarch’s Life of Alexander’, in Between Magic and Religion: Interdisciplinary Studies in Ancient Mediterranean Religion and Society, ed. Asirvatham, S., Pache, C. and Watrous, J.. Lanham, MA: 93125.Google Scholar
Asirvatham, S. R. (2005) ‘Classicism and Romanitas in Plutarch’s De Alexandri Fortuna aut Virtute’, AJPh 126.1: 107–25.Google Scholar
Asirvatham, S. R. (2010) ‘His Son’s Father? Philip II in the Second Sophistic’, in Philip II and Alexander the Great: Father and Son, Lives and Afterlives, ed. Ogden, D. and Carney, E.. Oxford: 193204.Google Scholar
Asirvatham, S. R. (2012) ‘Alexander the Philosopher in Greek, Arabic and Persian Traditions’, in The Alexander Romance in Persia and the East, ed. Erickson, K., Netton, I. and Stoneman, R.. Eelde: 311–26.Google Scholar
Beaujeu, J. (1955) La religion romaine à l’apogée de l’Empire: I. La politique religieuse des Antonins (96–192). Paris.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. (2016) ‘Xenophon’s Influence in Imperial Greece’, in The Cambridge Companion to Xenophon, ed. Flower, M.. Cambridge: 403–15.Google Scholar
Brown, T. S. (1967) ‘Alexander’s Book Order (Plut. Alex. 8)’, Historia 16.3: 359–68.Google Scholar
Buora, M. (1973–4) ‘L’incontro tra Alessandro e Diogenes. Tradizione e significato’, AIV 132: 243–64.Google Scholar
Cohoon, J. W. (ed. and tr.) (1932) Dio Chrysostom. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Emeljanow, V. (1967) ‘The Letters of Diogenes’. Dissertation, Stanford.Google Scholar
Gilley, D. (2009) ‘Damn with Faint Praise: A Historical Commentary on Plutarch’s On the Fortune or Virtue of Alexander the Great 1’. Dissertation, Columbia, MO.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. (2007) ‘The Younger Pliny’s Debt to Moral Philosophy’, HSPh 103: 451–81.Google Scholar
Höistad, R. (1948) ‘Cynic Hero and Cynic King: Studies in the Cynic Conception of Man’. Dissertation, Uppsala.Google Scholar
Jones, C. P. (1966) ‘Towards a Chronology of Plutarch’s Works’, JRS 56.1–2: 6174.Google Scholar
Koulakiotis, E. (2006) Genese und Metamorphosen des Alexandermythos: im Spiegel der griechischen nichthistoriographischen Überlieferung bis zum 3. Jh. n. Chr. Konstanz.Google Scholar
Kühnen, A. (2008) Die imitatio Alexandri in der römischen Politik. Munster.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (2002) Epictetus: A Stoic and Socratic Guide to Life. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutz, C. E. (1947) Musonius Rufus, the Roman Socrates. YClS 10: 3147.Google Scholar
Malherbe, A. (1977) The Cynic Epistles, A Study Edition. Missoula, MT.Google Scholar
McCoy, M. (2013). Wounded Heroes: Vulnerability As a Virtue in Ancient Greek Literature and Philosophy. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moles, J. L. (1983) ‘The Date and Purpose of the Fourth Kingship Oration of Dio Chrysostom’, ClAnt 2: 251–78.Google Scholar
Moles, J. L. (1990) ‘The Kingship Orations of Dio Chrysostom’, PLLS 6: 297375.Google Scholar
Pearson, L. (1960) The Lost Histories of Alexander the Great. New York and Oxford.Google Scholar
Peerlkamp, J. V. (1822) C. Musonii Rufi Philosophi Stoici Reliquiae et Apophthegmata. Haarlem.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (2007) ‘Epictetus on Cynicism’, in The Philosophy of Epictetus, ed. Scaltsas, T. and Mason, A.. Oxford: 7186.Google Scholar
Stadter, P., and Van der Stockt, L. (eds.) (2002) Sage and Emperor: Plutarch, Greek Intellectuals, and Roman Power in the Time of Trajan (98–117 A.D.). Leuven.Google Scholar
Stoneman, R. (2003) ‘The Legacy of Alexander in Ancient Philosophy’, in Brill’s Companion to Alexander the Great, ed. Roisman, J.. Leuven: 323–45.Google Scholar
Swain, S. (1996) Hellenism and Empire: Language, Classicism and Power in the Greek World, AD 50–250. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarn, W. W. (1948) Alexander the Great, vol. 2. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Trapp, M. (ed. and trans.) (1997) Maximus of Tyre. The Philosophical Orations. Oxford.Google Scholar
Trapp, M. (2007) Philosophy in the Roman Empire: Ethics, Politics and Society. Burlington, VT.Google Scholar
van Geytenbeek, A. C. (1963) Musonius Rufus and Greek Diatribe, rev. and tr. by B. L. Hijmans Jr. Assen.Google Scholar
von Arnim, H. (1898) Leben und Werke des Dio von Prusa. Berlin.Google Scholar
Weinstock, S. (1957) ‘Victor and Invictus’, HThR 50.3: 211–47.Google Scholar
Whitby, M. (2016) ‘Onesikritos (134)’, in Brill’s New Jacoby. Consulted online on 28 April 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1873-5363_bnj_a134Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. (2001) Greek Literature and the Roman Empire. The Politics of Imitation. Oxford.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×