Book contents
- History in the Humanities and Social Sciences
- History in the Humanities and Social Sciences
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 Law and History, History and Law
- 2 History, Law and the Rediscovery of Social Theory
- 3 The Uses of History in the Study of International Politics
- 4 International Relations Theory and Modern International Order: The Case of Refugees
- 5 The Delphi Syndrome: Using History in the Social Sciences
- 6 Power in Narrative and Narratives of Power in Historical Sociology
- 7 History and Normativity in Political Theory: The Case of Rawls
- 8 Political Philosophy and the Uses of History
- 9 The Relationship between Philosophy and its History
- 10 When Reason Does Not See You: Feminism at the Intersection of History and Philosophy
- 11 On (Lost and Found) Analytical History in Political Science
- 12 Making History: Poetry and Prosopopoeia
- 13 Reloading the British Romantic Canon: The Historical Editing of Literary Texts
- 14 Economics and History: Analysing Serfdom
- 15 The Return of Depression Economics: Paul Krugman and the Twenty-First-Century Crisis of American Democracy
- 16 Anthropology and the Turn to History
- Index
- References
4 - International Relations Theory and Modern International Order: The Case of Refugees
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 December 2022
Book contents
- History in the Humanities and Social Sciences
- History in the Humanities and Social Sciences
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 Law and History, History and Law
- 2 History, Law and the Rediscovery of Social Theory
- 3 The Uses of History in the Study of International Politics
- 4 International Relations Theory and Modern International Order: The Case of Refugees
- 5 The Delphi Syndrome: Using History in the Social Sciences
- 6 Power in Narrative and Narratives of Power in Historical Sociology
- 7 History and Normativity in Political Theory: The Case of Rawls
- 8 Political Philosophy and the Uses of History
- 9 The Relationship between Philosophy and its History
- 10 When Reason Does Not See You: Feminism at the Intersection of History and Philosophy
- 11 On (Lost and Found) Analytical History in Political Science
- 12 Making History: Poetry and Prosopopoeia
- 13 Reloading the British Romantic Canon: The Historical Editing of Literary Texts
- 14 Economics and History: Analysing Serfdom
- 15 The Return of Depression Economics: Paul Krugman and the Twenty-First-Century Crisis of American Democracy
- 16 Anthropology and the Turn to History
- Index
- References
Summary
This chapter examines the proposal that theories of international relations provide an invaluable resource for comprehending the politics of forced migration. To interrogate this proposition, the essay takes up the question of how forced migration, came to be written out of the study of international politics in the first place. This development, the essay argues, contributed to a fundamentally static vision of international order, a fact that has a significant bearing on the proposition that IR possesses unique intellectual and conceptual resources to grapple with the challenges introduced by climate migration. In evaluating the larger proposal to draw on the resources of IR to comprehend an emergent crisis, the further question to consider is what a revised historical account of international order implies for the proposal that theories of international relations can illuminate the present dynamics of global politics. As this essay argues, a consideration of the common enterprise undertaken by historical IR scholars and historians to historicize the dominant representations of international politics indicates the virtues of conceiving of IR theory as a distinct resource for analytically grasping the global political implications of climate migration.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- History in the Humanities and Social Sciences , pp. 90 - 115Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Achiume, Tendayi. 2019. ‘Migration as Decolonization’, Stanford Law Review, 71: 6, pp. 1509–74.Google Scholar
Armitage, David. 2004. ‘The Fifty Years’ Rift: Intellectual History and International Relations’, Modern Intellectual History, 1: 1, pp. 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armitage, David. 2007. The Declaration of Independence: A Global History. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Armitage, David. 2014. ‘The International Turn in Intellectual History’ in Rethinking Modern European Intellectual History, ed. McMahon, Darrin and Moyn, Samuel. Oxford.Google Scholar
Armitage, David. 2015. ‘Modern International Thought: Problems and Prospects’, History of European Ideas, 41: 1, pp. 116–30.Google Scholar
Aron, Raymond. 1967. ‘What is a Theory of International Relations?’, Journal of International Affairs, 21: 2, pp. 185–206.Google Scholar
Bain, William and Nardin, Terry. 2017. ‘International Relations and Intellectual History’, International Relations, 31: 3, pp. 213–26.Google Scholar
Ballinger, Pamela. 2013. ‘Impossible Returns, Enduring Legacies: Recent Historiography of Displacement and the Reconstruction of Europe after World War II’, Contemporary European History, 22: 1, pp. 127–38.Google Scholar
Barkan, Elezar and Adelman, Howard. 2011. No Return, No Refuge: Rites and Rights in Minority Repatriation. New York.Google Scholar
Bell, Duncan. 2001. ‘International Relations: The Dawn of a Historiographical Turn?’, British Journal of Political and International Relations, 3, pp. 115–26.Google Scholar
Bell, Duncan. forthcoming. ‘International Relations and Intellectual History’ in The Oxford Handbook of Historical International Relations, ed. Bukovansky, Mlada, Keene, Edward, Reus-Smit, Christian and Spanu, Maja. Oxford.Google Scholar
Benton, Lauren. 1996. ‘From the World-Systems Perspective to Institutional World History: Culture and Economy in Global Theory’, Journal of World History, 7: 2, pp. 261–95.Google Scholar
Benton, Lauren. 2009. A Search for Sovereignty: Law and Geography in European Empires 1400–1900. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, Nathaniel. 2019. ‘Drama through Law: The Versailles Treaty and the Casting of the Modern International Stage’ in Peace through Law: The Versailles Peace Treaty and Dispute Settlement after World War I, ed. Erpelding, Michel, Hess, Burhard and Fabri, Hélène Ruiz. Luxembourg.Google Scholar
Betts, Alexander. 2014. ‘International Relations and Forced Migration’ in The Oxford Handbook of Refugee and Forced Migration Studies, ed. Fiddian-Qasmiyah, Elena, Loescher, Gil, Long, Katy and Sigona, Nando. Oxford.Google Scholar
Betts, Alexander and Loescher, Gil, eds. 2011. Refugees in International Relations. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bevir, Mark. 2015. ‘Historicism and Critique’, Philosophy of the Social Science, 45: 2, pp. 227–45.Google Scholar
Bially, Mattern and Zarakol, Ayşe. 2016. ‘Hierarchies in World Politics’, International Organization, 70: 3, pp. 623–54.Google Scholar
Bourke, Richard. 2021. ‘European Empire and International Law from the Eighteenth to the Twentieth Century’, Historical Journal, 64: 3, pp. 812–21.Google Scholar
Brett, Annabel, Donaldson, Megan and Koskenniemi, Martti, eds. 2021. History, Law, Politics: Thinking through the International. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bukovansky, Mlada, Keene, Edward, Reus-Smit, Christian and Spanu, Maja, eds. forthcoming. The Oxford Handbook of History and International Relations. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley. 1977. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buzan, Barry. 2004. From International to World Society? English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry and George, Lawson. 2014. ‘Capitalism and the Emergent World Order’, International Affairs, 90: 1, pp. 71–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buzan, Barry and George, Lawson. 2015. The Global Transformation: History, Modernity, and the Making of International Relations. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Carey, Jane Perry Clark. 1946. ‘Some Aspects of Statelessness since World War I’, American Political Science Review, 40: 1, pp. 113–23.Google Scholar
Christov, Theodor. 2015. Before Anarchy: Hobbes and his Critics in Modern International Thought. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cooper, Frederick. 2005. Colonialism in Question: Theory, Knowledge, History. Berkeley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, Frederick. 2018. Citizenship, Inequality, Difference: Historical Perspectives. Princeton.Google Scholar
Del Mar, Maks and Lobban, Michael, eds. 2016. Law in Theory and History: New Essays on a Neglected Dialogue. Oxford.Google Scholar
Drayton, Richard and Motadel, David. 2018. ‘Discussion: The Future of Global History’, Journal of Global History, 13: 1, pp. 1–21.Google Scholar
Fine, Sarah and Ypi, Lea, eds. 2016. Migration in Political Theory: The Ethics of Movement and Membership. Oxford.Google Scholar
Getachew, Adom. 2018. ‘The Limits of Sovereignty as Responsibility’, Constellations, 26: 2, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
Gofas, Andreas, Hamati-Ataya, Inanna and Onuf, Nicholas, eds. 2018. Handbook of the History, Philosophy, and Sociology of International Relations. London.Google Scholar
Guilhot, Nicolas. 2017. After the Enlightenment: Political Realism and International Relations in the Mid-Twentieth Century. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Haddad, Emma. 2009. The Refugee in International Society: Between Sovereigns. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hollinger, David. 1990. ‘Reflections on the Jamesian Arch: A Response to Ian Hacking’, New Literary History, 21: 2, pp. 365–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurrell, Andrew. 2011. ‘Refugees, International Society, Global Order’ in Refugees in International Relations, ed. Betts, Alexander and Loescher, Gil. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hutchings, Kimberly. 2014. ‘Contribution to a Critical Exchange on David Armitage’s Foundations of Modern International Thought’, Contemporary Political Theory, 13: 4, pp. 387–92.Google Scholar
Isaac, Joel. 2012. Working Knowledge: Making the Human Sciences from Parsons to Kuhn. Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keene, Edward. 2002. Beyond the Anarchical Society: Grotius, Colonialism and Order in World Politics. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Keene, Edward. 2014. ‘The Standard of “Civilisation”, the Expansion Thesis and the 19th Century International Social Space’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 42: 3, pp. 651–73.Google Scholar
Kleinberg, Ethan, Wallach Scott, Joan and Wilder, Gary. 2020. ‘Theses on Theory and History’, History of the Present, 10: 1, pp. 157–65.Google Scholar
Kukathas, Chandran. 2016. ‘Are Refugees Special?’ in Migration in Political Theory: The Ethics of Movement and Membership, ed. Fine, Sarah and Ypi, Lea. Oxford.Google Scholar
Lawson, George. 2018. ‘International Relations as a Historical Social Science’ in Handbook of the History, Philosophy, and Sociology of International Relations, ed. Gofas, Andreas, Hamati-Ataya, Inanna and Onuf, Nicholas. London.Google Scholar
Maier, Charles S. 2016. Once Within Border: Territories of Power, Wealth and Belonging since 1500. Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malin, Patrick Murphy. 1947. ‘The Refugee, a Problem for International Organization’, International Organization, 1: 3, pp. 443–59.Google Scholar
Morefield, Jeanne. 2020. ‘Crashing the Cathedral: Historical Reassessments of Twentieth-Century International Relations’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 81: 1, pp. 131–55.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans. 2011 [1954]. ‘The Theoretical and Practical Importance of a Theory of International Relations’ in The Invention of International Relations Theory: Realism, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the 1954 Conference on Theory, ed. Guilhot, Nicolas. New York.Google Scholar
Niebuhr, Reinhold. 2011 [1954]. ‘The Moral Issue in International Relations’ in The Invention of International Relations Theory: Realism, the Rockefeller Foundation and the 1954 Conference on Theory, ed. Guilhot, Nicolas. New York.Google Scholar
Ogle, Vanessa. 2017. ‘Archipelago Capitalism: Tax Havens, Offshore Money, and the State, 1950s–1970s’, American Historical Review, 122: 5, pp. 1431–58.Google Scholar
Onuf, Nicholas. 2017. ‘What We Do: International Relations as Craft’ in Handbook of the History, Philosophy, and Sociology of International Relations, ed. Gofas, Andreas, Hamati-Ataya, Inanna and Onuf, Nicholas. London.Google Scholar
Parfitt, Rose. 2019. The Process of International Legal Reproduction: Inequality, Historiography, Resistance. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pedersen, Susan. 2015. The Guardians: The League of Nations and the Crisis of Empire. Oxford.Google Scholar
Phillips, Andrew and Sharman, J. C.. 2015. International Order in Diversity. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pitts, Jennifer. 2018. Boundaries of the International: Law and Empire. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian. 2008. ‘Reading History through Constructivist Eyes’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 37: 2, pp. 395–414.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Brian. 1998. The Political Discourse of Anarchy: A Disciplinary History of International Relations. Albany, NY.Google Scholar
Schroeder, Paul W. 1997. ‘History and International Relations Theory: Not Use or Abuse, but Fit or Misfit’, International Security, 22: 1, pp. 64–74.Google Scholar
Schroeder, Paul W. 2004. Systems, Stability and Statecraft: Essays on the International History of Modern Europe. New York.Google Scholar
Sewell, William. 2005. Logics of History: Social Theory and Social Transformation. Chicago.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 1997. ‘Sir Geoffrey Elton and the Practice of History’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 7, pp. 301–16.Google Scholar
Srinivasan, Amia. 2019. ‘Genealogy, Epistemology and Worldmaking’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 119: 2, pp. 127–56.Google Scholar
Teschke, Benno. 2003. The Myth of 1648: Class, Geopolitics, and the Making of Modern International Relations. London.Google Scholar
Thomas, Chantal. 2016. ‘Transnational Migration, Globalization, and Governance: Theorizing a Crisis’ in The Oxford Handbook of the Theory of International Law, ed. Orford, Anne and Hoffmann, Florian. Oxford.Google Scholar
United Nations. 1950. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on Statelessness – Position Paper. ECOSOC SD/E/448, box 3, RG59 General Records of the Department of State, National Archives and Records Administration, 10 June.Google Scholar
Vitalis, Robert. 2015. White World Order, Black Power Politics: The Birth of American International Relations. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Walker, R. B. J. 1992. Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wight, Martin. 1966. ‘Why is there no International Theory?’ in Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory of International Politics, ed. Butterfield, Herbert, Wight, Martin and Bull, Hedley. London.Google Scholar