Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T04:01:22.881Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Age Effects on Language Acquisition, Retention and Loss

Key Hypotheses and Findings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2018

By
Niclas Abrahamsson ,
Kenneth Hyltenstam  and
Emanuel Bylund
Edited by
Kenneth Hyltenstam ,
Inge Bartning  and
Lars Fant
Kenneth Hyltenstam
Affiliation:
Stockholms Universitet
Inge Bartning
Affiliation:
Stockholms Universitet
Lars Fant
Affiliation:
Stockholms Universitet
Get access

Summary

This chapter asks to what extent the ultimate attainment in an L2 differs from that of native speakers, and why the rate of nativelike ultimate attainment differs between child and adult second language learners. A related issue is the role of language aptitude for the attainment of high-level proficiency. The chapter addresses these questions on the basis of extensive empirical findings and discusses their implications for our understanding of age-related/maturational, bilingualism-related/cross-linguistic, and aptitude-related determinants of language acquisition, and their complex interrelations. The methodology includes a strict selection of participants and native controls, a large battery of elicitation techniques with demanding language tasks (covering aspects of phonology, grammar and lexical idiomaticity in both production and perception), and an aptitude component. The findings privilege an interpretation of the lack of nativelikeness in L2 ultimate attainment in terms of maturational constraints rather than primarily as the effect of cross-linguistic (bilingualism) factors. Further, they suggest a role for aptitude as a contributing factor behind nativelike proficiency, strongly so for adult L2 learners, but also in L2 acquisition among bilingually developing children.
Type
Chapter
Information
High-Level Language Proficiency in Second Language and Multilingual Contexts , pp. 16 - 49
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrahamsson, N. 2012. Age of onset and nativelike L2 ultimate attainment of morphosyntactic and phonetic intuition. High-level L2 acquisition, learning, and use. Thematic issue of Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32/2: 187–214.Google Scholar
Abrahamsson, N. 2013. The critical period hypothesis (CPH), in Robinson, P. (ed.), The Routledge Encyclopedia of Second Language Acquisition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Abrahamsson, N. & Hyltenstam, K. 2008. The robustness of aptitude effects in near-native second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 30/1: 481–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abrahamsson, N. & Hyltenstam, K. 2009. Age of onset and nativelikeness in a second language: listener perception versus linguistic scrutiny. Language Learning 59/2: 249–306.Google Scholar
Ammerlaan, T. 1996. ‘You get a bit wobbly…’ – Exploring bilingual lexical retrieval processes in the context of first language attrition. PhD dissertation. Nijmegen: Katholieke Universiteit.Google Scholar
Andersen, R. W. 1982. Determining the linguistic attributes of language attrition, in Lambert, R. D. & Freed, B. F. (eds.), The Loss of Language Skills. Rowley: Newbury House Publishers. 83–118.Google Scholar
Asher, J. & García, G. 1969. The optimal age to learn a foreign language. Modern Language Journal 38: 334–341.Google Scholar
Asher, J. & Price, B. 1967. The learning strategy of the total physical response: Some age differences. Child Development 38: 1219–1227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bialystok, E. & Miller, B. 1999. The problem of age in second-language acquisition: Influences from language, structure, and task. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 2: 127–145.Google Scholar
Birdsong, D. 1999. Introduction: whys and why nots of the critical period hypothesis for second language acquisition, in Birdsong, D. (ed.), Second Language Acquisition and the Critical Period Hypothesis. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. 1–22.Google Scholar
Birdsong, D. 2005. Nativelikeness and non-nativelikeness in L2A research. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL) 43: 319–328.Google Scholar
Birdsong, D. 2006. Age and second language acquisition and processing: a selective overview. Language Learning 56: 9–49.Google Scholar
Birdsong, D. & Gertken, L. M. 2013. In faint praise of folly. A critical review of native/non-native speaker comparisons, with examples from native and bilingual processing of French complex syntax. Language, Interaction and Acquisition 4/2: 107–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bley-Vroman, R. 1989. What is the logical problem of foreign language learning? in Gass, S. & Schachter, J. (eds.), Linguistic Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 41–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bornstein, M. 1989. Sensitive periods in development: structural characteristics and causal interpretations. Psychological Bulletin 105: 179–197.Google Scholar
Bruer, J. T. 2008. Critical periods in second language learning: distinguishing phenomena from explanation, in Mody, M. & Silliman, E. (eds.), Brain, Behavior and Learning in Language and Reading Disorders. New York, NY: The Guilford Press. 72–96.Google Scholar
Butler, Y. G. 2000. The age effect in second language acquisition: is it too late to acquire native-level competence in a second language after the age of seven? in Oshima-Takane, Y. Shirai, Y. & Sirai, H. (eds.), Studies in Language Sciences 1. Tokyo: The Japanese Society for Language Sciences. 159–169.Google Scholar
Bylund, E. 2009a. Maturational constraints and first language attrition. Language Learning 59: 687–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bylund, E. 2009b. Effects of age of L2 acquisition on L1 event conceptualization patterns. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 12/3: 305–322.Google Scholar
Bylund, E. in press. Age effects in language attrition, in Schmid, M. & Köpke, B. (eds.), Handbook in Language Attrition. Oxford. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bylund, E., Abrahamsson, N. & Hyltenstam, K. 2010. The role of language aptitude in first language attrition: the case of pre-pubescent attriters. Applied Linguistics 31/3: 443–464.Google Scholar
Bylund, E., Abrahamsson, N. & Hyltenstam, K. 2012. Does first language maintenance hamper nativelikeness in a second language? High-level L2 acquisition, learning, and use. Thematic issue of Studies in Second Language Acquisition 34/2: 215–241.Google Scholar
Bylund, E. & Díaz, M. 2012. The effects of heritage language instruction on first language proficiency: a psycholinguistic perspective. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 15/5: 593–609.Google Scholar
Bylund, E., Hyltenstam, K. & Abrahamsson, N. 2013. Age of acquisition effects or effects of bilingualism in second language ultimate attainment? in Granena, G. & Long, M. (eds.), Sensitive Periods, Language Aptitude, and Ultimate L2 Attainment. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. 69–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, J. B. 1973. Implications of aptitude test research and psycholinguistic theory for foreign language teaching. International Journal of Psycholingistics 2: 5–14.Google Scholar
Chiswick, B. R. & Miller, P. W. 2008. A test of the critical period hypothesis for language learning. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 29/1: 16–29.Google Scholar
Choi, J., Broersma, M. & Cutler, A. 2017. Early phonology revealed by international adoptees’ birth language retention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, PNAS. 11 July, 114/28: 7307–7312.Google Scholar
Colombo, J. 1982. The critical period concept: research, methodology, and theoretical concerns. Psychological Bulletin 91: 260–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, V. J. 1991. The poverty-of-the-stimulus argument and multi-competence. Second Language Research 7/2: 103–117.Google Scholar
Cook, V. 1999. Going beyond the native speaker in language teaching. TESOL Quarterly 33: 185–209.Google Scholar
Cook, V. 2002. Background to the L2 user, in Cook, V. (ed.), Portraits of the L2 user. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 1–28.Google Scholar
Davies, A. 2003. The Native Speaker: Myth and Reality. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. 2006. A critique of recent arguments against the critical period hypothesis, in Abello-Contesse, C., Chacón-Beltrán, R., López-Jiménez, M. D. & Torreblanca-López, M. M. (eds.), Age in L2 Acquisition and Teaching. Bern: Peter Lang. 49–58.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. M. 2000. The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 22: 499–533.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. & Larson-Hall, J. 2005. What does the Critical Period really mean? in Kroll, J. F. & de Groot, A. M. B. (eds.), Handbook of Bilingualism: Psycholinguistic Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 88–108.Google Scholar
Dewaele, J.-M. 2017. Why the dichotomy ‘L1 versus LX user’ is better than ‘native versus non-native speaker’. Applied Linguistics, published online January 2017. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amw055.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., Yeni-Komshian, G. H. & Liu, S. 1999. Age constraints on second-language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language 41/1: 78–104.Google Scholar
Granena, G. 2013a. Cognitive aptitudes for second language learning and the LLAMA Language Aptitude Test, in Granena, G. & Long, M. (eds.), Sensitive Periods, Language Aptitude, and Ultimate Attainment. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. 105–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granena, G. 2013b. Reexamining the robustness of aptitude in second language acquisition, in Granena, G. & Long, M. (eds.), Sensitive Periods, Language Aptitude, and Ultimate Attainment. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. 179–204.Google Scholar
Granena, G. & Long, M. H. 2013. Age of onset, length of residence, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment in three linguistic domains. Second Language Research 29/3: 311–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hakuta, K., Bialystok, E. & Wiley, E. 2003. Critical evidence: a test of the critical period hypothesis for second-language acquisition. Psychological Science 14/1: 31–38.Google Scholar
Hernández, A., Bates, E. & Ávila, L. 1994. On-line sentence interpretation in Spanish–English bilinguals: what does it mean to be ‘in between’? Applied Psycholinguistics 15: 416–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, B. H. 2014. The effects of age on second language grammar and speech production. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 43: 397–420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hyltenstam, K. 1992. Non-native features of near-native speakers. On the ultimate attainment of childhood L2 learners, in Harris, R. J. (ed.), Cognitive Processing in Bilinguals. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science. 351–368.Google Scholar
Hyltenstam, K. 2010. Critical periods, in Hogan, P. C. (ed.), The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the Language Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 238–240.Google Scholar
Hyltenstam, K. 2012. Critical period, in Chapelle, C. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hyltenstam, K. 2018 (this volume, Chapter 7). Polyglotism – a synergy of abilities and predispositions, in Hyltenstam, K., Bartning, I. & Fant, L. (eds.), High-Level Language Proficiency in Second Language and Multilingual Contexts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hyltenstam, K. & Abrahamsson, N. 2000. Who can become native-like in a second language? All, some, or none? On the maturational constraints controversy in second language acquisition. Studia Linguistica 54/2: 150–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyltenstam, K. & Abrahamsson, N. 2001. Age and L2 learning: the hazards of matching practical ‘implications’ with theoretical ‘facts’. (Comments on Stefka H. Marinova-Todd, D. Bradford Marshall, and Catherine E. Snow’s ‘Three misconceptions about age and L2 learning’). TESOL Quarterly 35/1: 151–170.Google Scholar
Hyltenstam, K. & Abrahamsson, N. 2003a. Maturational constraints in SLA, in Doughty, C. J. & Long, M. H. (eds.), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell. 539–588.Google Scholar
Hyltenstam, K. & Abrahamsson, N. 2003b. Age of onset and ultimate attainment in near-native speakers of Swedish, in Fraurud, K. & Hyltenstam, K. (eds.), Multilingualism in Global and Local Perspectives. Selected Papers from the 8th Nordic Conference on Bilingualism, November 1–3, 2001, Stockholm Rinkeby. Stockholm: Centre for Research on Bilingualism, Stockholm University, and Rinkeby Institute of Multilingual Research. 319–340.Google Scholar
Hyltenstam, K., Bylund, E., Abrahamsson, N. & Park, H.-S. 2009. Dominant-language replacement: the case of international adoptees. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 12/2: 121–140.Google Scholar
Ioup, G. 1989. Immigrant children who have failed to acquire native English, in Gass, S., Madden, C., Preston, D. & Selinker, L. (eds.), Variation in Second Language Acquisition: Vol. 2. Psycholinguistic Issues. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 160–175.Google Scholar
Ioup, G., Boustagui, E., El Tigi, M. & Moselle, M. 1994. Reexamining the critical period hypothesis: a case study in a naturalistic environment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 16: 73–98.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. S. & Newport, E. L. 1989. Critical period effects in second language learning: the influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology 21: 60–99.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. 1973. Lateralization, language learning, and the critical period: some new evidence. Language Learning 23: 63–74.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. D. 1976. Formal and informal linguistic environments in language acquisition and language learning. TESOL Quarterly 10/2: 157–168.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. D., Long, M. A. & Scarcella, R. C. 1979. Age, rate, and eventual attainment in second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly 13: 573–582.Google Scholar
Kroll, J. F. & Stewart, E. 1994. Category interference in translation and picture naming: evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language 33/2: 149–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroll, J. F. & Tokowicz, N. 2005. Models of bilingual representation and processing: looking back and to the future, in Kroll, J. F. & De Groot, A. M. B. (eds.), Handbook of Bilingualism: Psycholinguistic Approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 531–533.Google Scholar
Lamendella, J. T. 1977. General principles of neurofunctional organization and their manifestation in primary and nonprimary language acquisition. Language Learning 27/1: 155–196.Google Scholar
Lenneberg, E. 1967. Biological Foundations of Language. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. 1990. Maturational constraints on language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 12: 251–285.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. 1993. Second language acquisition as a function of age: research findings and methodological issues, in Hyltenstam, K. & Viberg, Å. (eds.), Progression and Regression in Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 196–221.Google Scholar
Long, M. 2013. Maturational constraints on child and adult SLA, in Granena, G. & Long, M. (eds.), Sensitive Periods, Language Aptitude, and Ultimate L2 Attainment.Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 3–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B. 2005. A unified model of language acquisition, in Kroll, J. F. & De Groot, A. M. B. (eds.), Handbook of Bilingualism: Psycholinguistic Approaches.Oxford: Oxford University Press. 49–67.Google Scholar
Meara, P., Milton, J. & Lorenzo-Dus, N. 2003. Swansea Language Aptitude Tests (LAT) v2.0. Swansea: Lognostics.Google Scholar
Muñoz, C. & Singleton, D. 2011. A critical review of age-related research on L2 ultimate attainment. Language Teaching 44: 1–35.Google Scholar
Munro, M. & Mann, V. 2005. Age of immersion as a predictor of foreign accent. Applied Psycholinguistics 26/3: 311–341.Google Scholar
Norrman, G. & Bylund, E. 2016. The irreversability of sensitive period effects in language development: evidence from second language acquisition in international adoptees. Developmental Science 19/3: 513–520.Google Scholar
Norrman, G., Hyltenstam, K. & Bylund, E. 2016. Long-term language development in international adoptees, in Genesee, F. & Delcenserie, A. (eds.), Starting Over – Language Development in Internationally-Adopted Children. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 125–145.Google Scholar
Obler, L. K. 1989. Exceptional second language learners, in Gass, S., Madden, C., Preston, D. & Selinker, L. (eds.), Variation in Second Language Acquisition. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 141–149.Google Scholar
Oh, J. S., Au, T. K.-F. & Jun, S.-A. 2010. Early childhood language memory in the speech perception of international adoptees. Journal of Child Language 37/5: 1123–1132.Google Scholar
Olson, L. & Samuels, S. J. 1973. The relationship between age and accuracy of foreign language pronunciation. Journal of Educational Research 66: 263–267.Google Scholar
Ortega, L. 2010. The bilingual turn in SLA. Plenary Delivered at the Annual Conference of the American Association for Applied Linguistics, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
Ortega, L. 2013. SLA for the 21st century: disciplinary progress, transdisciplinary relevance, and the bi/multilingual turn. Language Learning 63/1: 1–24.Google Scholar
Oyama, S. 1976. A sensitive period for the acquisition of a non-native phonological system. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 5: 261–285.Google Scholar
Oyama, S. 1978. The sensitive period and comprehension of speech. Working Papers on Bilingualism 16: 1–17.Google Scholar
Pallier, C., Dehaene, S., Poline, J.-B., LeBihan, D., Argenti, A.-M., Dupoux, E. & Mehler, J. 2003. Brain imaging of language plasticity in adopted adults: can a second language replace the first? Cerebral Cortex 13/2: 155–161.Google Scholar
Paradis, M. 2004. A Neurolinguistic Theory of Bilingualism. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Paradis, M. 2009. Declarative and Procedural Determinants of Second Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Park, H.-S. 2015. Korean adoptees in Sweden: have they lost their first language completely? Applied Psycholinguistics 36: 773–797.Google Scholar
Patkowski, M. 1980. The sensitive period for the acquisition of syntax in a second language. Language Learning 30: 449–472.Google Scholar
Penfield, W. & Roberts, L. 1959. Speech and Brain Mechanisms. New York, NY: Atheneum.Google Scholar
Pierce, L. J., Klein, D., Chen, J.-K., Delcenserie, A. & Genesee, F. 2014. Mapping the unconscious maintenance of a lost first language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111/48: 17314–17319.Google Scholar
Piller, I. 2002. Passing for a native speaker: identity and success in second language learning. Journal of Sociolinguistics 6: 179–206.Google Scholar
Pulvermüller, F. & Schumann, J. H. 1994. Neurobiological mechanisms of language acquisition. Language Learning 44: 681–734.Google Scholar
Schmid, M. S. 2002. First Language Attrition, Use and Maintenance: The Case of German Jews in Anglophone Countries. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.Google Scholar
Selinker, L. 1972. Interlanguage. IRAL 10: 209–230.Google Scholar
Singh, L., Liederman, J., Mierzejewski, R. & Barnes, J. 2011. Rapid reacquisition of native phoneme contrasts after disuse: you do not always lose what you do not use. Developmental Science 14/5: 949–959.Google Scholar
Snow, C. & Hoefnagel-Höhle, M. 1977. Age differences in the pronunciation of foreign sounds. Language and Speech 20: 357–365.Google Scholar
Snow, C. & Hoefnagel-Höhle, M. 1978. The critical period for language acquisition: evidence from second language learning. Child Development 49: 1114–1128.Google Scholar
Sorace, A. & Robertson, D. 2001. Measuring development and ultimate attainment in non-native grammars, in Elder, C., Brown, A., Grove, E., et al. (eds.), Experimenting with Uncertainty. Essays in Honour of Alan Davies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 264–274.Google Scholar
Stevens, G. 1999. Age at immigration and second language proficiency among foreign-born adults. Language in Society 28: 555–578.Google Scholar
Stölten, K., Abrahamsson, N. & Hyltenstam, K. 2014. Effects of age of learning on voice onset time: categorical perception of Swedish stops by near-native L2 speakers. Language and Speech 57/4: 425–450.Google Scholar
Stölten, K., Abrahamsson, N. & Hyltenstam, K. 2015. Effects of age and speaking rate on voice onset time: the production of voiceless stops by near-native L2 speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 37/1: 71–100.Google Scholar
Ullman, M. T. 2005. A cognitive neuroscience perspective on second language acquisition: the declarative/procedural model, in Sanz, C. (ed.), Mind and Context in Adult Second Language Acquisition: Methods, Theory, and Practice. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 141–178.Google Scholar
Ullman, M. T. 2015. The declarative/procedural model: a neurobiologically motivated theory of first and second language, in VanPatten, B. & Williams, J. (eds.), Theories in Second Language Acquisition: An Introduction (2nd edn.). New York, NY: Routledge. 135–158.Google Scholar
Ullman, M. T. & Pullman, M. Y. 2016. A compensatory role for declarative memory in neurodevelopmental disorders. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 51: 205–222.Google Scholar
Vanhove, J. 2013. The critical period hypothesis in second language acquisition: a statistical critique and a reanalysis. PLoS ONE 8(7), e69172. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0069172.Google Scholar
Vaughan-Evans, A., Kuipers, J. R., Thierry, G. & Jones, M. W. 2014. Anomalous transfer of syntax between languages. The Journal of Neuroscience 34/24: 8333–8335.Google Scholar
Ventureyra, V. A. G., Pallier, C. & Yoo, H.-Y. 2004. The loss of first language phonetic perception in adopted Koreans. Journal of Neurolinguistics 17/1: 79–91.Google Scholar
Yeni-Komshian, G. H., Flege, J. E. & Liu, S. 2000. Pronunciation proficiency in the first and second languages of Korean–English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 3/2: 131–149.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×