Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 April 2019
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Herder's Naturalist Aesthetics , pp. 252 - 261Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Adler, Hans. “Herders Ästhetik als Rationalitätstyp,” in Bollacher, Martin (ed.), Johann Gottfried Herder. Geschichte und Kultur (Würzburg: Verlag Königshausen und Neumann, 1994), pp. 131–9.Google Scholar
Adler, Hans. “Herder’s Concept of Humanität,” in Adler, and Koepke, (eds.), Companion to Herder, pp. 93–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Hans. “Herder’s Style,” in Adler, and Koepke, (eds.), Companion to Herder, pp. 331–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Hans. Die Prägnanz des Dunklen. Gnoseologie, Ästhetik, Geschichtsphilosophie bei Johann Gottfried Herder (Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1990).Google Scholar
Adler, Hans, and Koepke, Wulf (eds.). A Companion to the Works of Johann Gottfried Herder (Rochester, NY: Camden House, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry. Kant’s Theory of Taste (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb. Reflections on Poetry; Meditationes philosophicae de nonnullis ad poema pertinentibus, trans. Aschenbrenner, Karl and Holther, William B. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1954).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bäumler, Alfred. Das Irrationalitätsproblem in der Ästhetik und Logik des 18n Jahrhunderts bis zur Kritik der Urteilskraft (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1974).Google Scholar
Beidler, Paul G. “The Postmodern Sublime: Kant and Tony Smith’s Anecdote of the Cube,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 53: 2 (1995), 177–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beiser, Frederick. Diotima’s Children: German Aesthetic Rationalism from Leibniz to Lessing (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Beiser, Frederick. Enlightenment, Revolution, and Romanticism: The Genesis of Modern German Political Thought 1790–1800 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beiser, Frederick. Fate of Reason: German Philosophy from Kant to Fichte (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Beiser, Frederick. The German Historicist Tradition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkeley, George. An Essay toward a New Theory of Vision (Dublin: Aaron Rhames, 1709).Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah. Vico and Herder, in Berlin, I., Three Critics of the Enlightenment: Vico, Hamann, Herder (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Bertram, Georg W. Philosophie des Sturm und Drang. Eine Konstitution der Moderne (Munich: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, 2000).Google Scholar
BonJour, Lawrence. “Against Naturalized Epistemology,” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 19 (1994), 283–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, Emily. The Sublime in Modern Philosophy: Aesthetics, Ethics, and Nature (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchenau, Stefanie. The Founding of Aesthetics in the German Enlightenment: The Art of Invention and the Invention of Art (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchenau, Stefanie. “Herder: Physiology and Philosophical Anthropology,” in Waldow, and DeSouza, (eds.), Herder: Philosophy and Anthropology, pp. 72–93.Google Scholar
Budd, Malcolm. “Delight in the Natural World: Kant on the Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature; Part III: The Sublime in Nature,” British Journal of Aesthetics 38: 3 (1998), 233–50.Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund. A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origins of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful, ed. Philips, Adam (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Campe, Joachim Heinrich (ed.). Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache (Braunschweig: Schulbuchhandlung, 1807–11).Google Scholar
Carroll, Noël. On Criticism (Thinking in Action) (New York and Oxford: Routledge, 2008).Google Scholar
Cheetham, Mark. Kant, Art and History: Moments of Discipline (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Clairmont, Heinrich. “‘Die Leute wollen keinen Gott, als in ihrer Uniform, ein menschliches Fabelthier’: Herders anthropologisch fundierte Gnoseologie und seine Spinozadeutung in Gott,” in Schürmann, Eva, Waszek, Norbert, and Weinreich, Frank (eds.), Spinoza in Deutschland des achtzehnten Jahrhunderts (Stuttgart: Fromann-Holzboog, 2002), pp. 329–55.Google Scholar
Clark, Robert. Herder: His Life and Thought (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1955).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochrane, Tom. “The Emotional Experience of the Sublime,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 42: 2 (2012), 125–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohn, Jan, and Miles, Thomas H.. “The Sublime in Alchemy, Aesthetics and Psychoanalysis,” Modern Philology 74: 3 (1977), 289–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cordemann, Claas. Herders christlicher Monismus. Eine Studie zur Grundlegung von Johann Gottfried Herders Christologie und Humanitätsideal (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2010).Google Scholar
Couturier-Heinrich, Clémence. “‘Der Innigste, der Tiefste der Sinne’ – Das Gehör in Herders Viertem Kritischen Wäldchen,” in Allert, Beate (ed.), J. G. Herder: From Cognition to Cultural Science (Heidelberg: Synchron, 2016), pp. 79–94.Google Scholar
Cutrofello, Andrew. “Kant’s Debate with Herder about the Philosophical Significance of the Genius of Shakespeare,” Philosophy Compass 3 (2008), 66–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Man, Paul. “Phenomenality and Materiality in Kant,” in Silverman, Hugh J. and Aylesworth, Gary E. (eds.), The Textual Sublime: Deconstruction and Its Differences (Albany: SUNY Press, 1990), pp. 87–108.Google Scholar
Deligiorgi, Katerina. “The Pleasures of Contra-Purposiveness: Kant, the Sublime, and Being Human,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 72: 1 (2014), 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doran, Robert. The Theory of the Sublime from Longinus to Kant (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutton, Denis. The Art Instinct: Beauty, Pleasure, and Human Evolution (New York: Bloomsbury, 2009).Google Scholar
Eaton, Anne W. “What’s Wrong with the (Female) Nude?,” in Maes, Hans and Levinson, Jerry (eds.), Art and Pornography: Philosophical Essays (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), pp. 277–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, Lee. “At Risk in the Sublime,” in Kauffman, Linda (ed.), Gender and Theory: Dialogues on Feminist Criticism (Oxford: Blackwell, 1989), pp. 213–24.Google Scholar
Elkins, James. “Against the Sublime,” in Hoffmann, Roald and Whyte, Iain Boyd (eds.), Beyond the Finite: The Sublime in Art and Science (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), pp. 75–90.Google Scholar
Ferry, Luc. Homo Aestheticus: l’invention du goût à l’age démocratique (Paris: Grasset, 1990).Google Scholar
Foley, Richard. “Quine and Naturalized Epistemology,” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 19 (1994), 243–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forster, Michael N. After Herder: Philosophy of Language in the German Tradition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Freeman, Barbara Claire. The Feminine Sublime (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Fried, Michael. “Art and Objecthood,” in Art and Objecthood: Essays and Reviews (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998), pp. 148–72.Google Scholar
Fugate, Joe. The Psychological Basis of Herder’s Aesthetics (The Hague: Mouton, 1966).Google Scholar
Fumerton, Richard. “Skepticism and Naturalistic Epistemology,” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 19 (1994), 321–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaier, Ulrich. “Myth, Mythology, New Mythology,” in Adler, and Koepke, (eds.), A Companion to Herder, pp. 165–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaiger, Jason. “Indeterminacy and Ideal Form: Herder’s Theory of Landscape Depiction,” unpublished paper.Google Scholar
Gaiger, Jason. “Introduction,” in Johann Gottfried Herder, Sculpture: Some Observations on Shape and Form from Pygmalion’s Creative Dream, ed. and trans. Gaiger, Jason (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Gasché, Rodolphe. “On Mere Sight: A Response to de Man,” in Silverman, Hugh J. and Aylesworth, Gary E. (eds.), The Textual Sublime: Deconstruction and Its Differences (Albany: SUNY Press, 1990), pp. 109–16.Google Scholar
Gaskill, Howard. “Introduction,” in Ossian Revisited (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1991), pp. 6–16.Google Scholar
Gaskill, Howard, and Schmidt, Wolf Gerhard (eds.). “Homer des Nordens” und “Mutter der Romantik”: James Macphersons “Ossian” und seine Rezeption in deutschsprachigen Literatur, vol. IV: Kommentierte Neuausgabe wichtiger Texte zur deutschen Rezeption (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2004).Google Scholar
Gjesdal, Kristin. “Hegel and Herder on Art, History, and Reason,” Philosophy and Literature 30: 1 (2006), 17–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gjesdal, Kristin. Herder’s Hermeneutics: History, Poetry, Enlightenment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, R. L., and Wallace, J. G., Recovery from Early Blindness, Experimental Psychology Monographs no. 2 (Cambridge, MA: Hefner and Sons, 1963).Google Scholar
Greif, Stefan. “Herders Philosophie des Lebens in Poetologischer Perspektive,” Herder Jahrbuch 13 (2016), 85–102.Google Scholar
Greif, Stefan. “Komplementäre Fremdheit. Das Reflexivwerden des Eigenen und das transkulturelle Subjekt bei Johann Gottfried Herder und Thomas Meinecke,” in Barsch, Achim, Scheuer, Helmut, and Schulz, Georg-Michael (eds.), Literatur – Kunst – Medien. Festschrift für Peter Seibert (Munich: Meindenbauer, 2008), pp. 31–45.Google Scholar
Groß, Sabine (ed.). Herausforderung Herder/Herder as Challenge (Heidelberg: Synchron, 2010).Google Scholar
Groß, Sabine “Herder’s ‘Prescient’ Aisthesis: An Update on Touch and Vision,” Herder Jahrbuch 7 (2004), 69–87.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. “18th Century German Aesthetics,” in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, www.plato.stanford.edu/entries/aesthetics-18th-german.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. “Free Play and True Well-Being: Herder’s Critique of Kant’s Aesthetics,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 65: 4 (2007), 353–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul. A History of Modern Aesthetics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Hamann, Johann Georg. “Aesthetica in Nuce” [1760], in Bernstein, J. M. (ed.), Classical and Romantic German Aesthetics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
Hammermeister, Kai. The German Aesthetic Tradition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harold, James. “The Value of Fictional Worlds, or Why The Lord of the Rings is Worth Reading,” Contemporary Aesthetics (2010) at www.contempaesthetics.org/newvolume/pages/article.php?articleID=584.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. Aesthetics: Lectures on Fine Art, trans. Knox, T. M. (Oxford: Clarendon, 1975).Google Scholar
Heinz, Marion. “Anthropology and the Critique of Metaphysics in the Early Herder,” in Waldow, and DeSouza, (eds.), Herder: Philosophy and Anthropology, pp. 30–51.Google Scholar
Heinz, Marion. “Grundzüge von Herders Psychologie: ‘Uebers Erkennen und Empfinden der Menschlichen Seele’,” in Koepke, Wulf (ed.), Johann Gottfried Herder: Academic Disciplines and the Pursuit of Knowledge (Columbia, SC: Camden House, 1996), pp. 137–51.Google Scholar
Heinz, Marion. Sensualistischer Idealismus. Untersuchungen der Erkenntnistheorie und Metaphysik des jungen Herder (1763–1778) (Hamburg: Meiner, 1994).Google Scholar
Heller, Morton A., and Ballesteros, Soledad (eds.). Touch and Blindness: Psychology and Neuroscience (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Home, Henry (Lord Kames). Elements of Criticism, ed. Jones, Peter (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2005).Google Scholar
Hopkins, Robert. “Painting, Sculpture, Sight and Touch,” British Journal of Aesthetics 44: 2 (2004), 149–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huhn, Thomas. “The Kantian Sublime and the Nostalgia for Violence,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 53: 3 (1995), 269–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutcheson, Francis. An Inquiry into the Original of Our Ideas of Beauty and Virtue, ed. Leidhold, Wolfgang (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2004).Google Scholar
Hylton, Peter. “Quine’s Naturalism Revisited,” in Harman, Gilbert and Lepore, Ernie (eds.), A Companion to W. V. O. Quine (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2014), pp. 148–62.Google Scholar
Irmscher, Hans Dietrich. “Der Vergleich im Denken Herders,” in Koepke, Wulf (ed.), Johann Gottfried Herder: Academic Disciplines and the Pursuit of Knowledge (Columbia, SC: Camden House, 1996), pp. 78–97.Google Scholar
Irvin, Sherri. “Scratching an Itch,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 66: 1 (2008), 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Frank. From Metaphysics to Ethics: A Defense of Conceptual Analysis (Oxford: Clarendon, 1998).Google Scholar
Jacoby, Günther. Herder und Kants Ästhetik (Leipzig: Verlag der Dürrschen Buchhandlung, 1907).Google Scholar
James, Thomas W., James, Karen Harman, Humphrey, G. Keith, and Goodale, Melvyn A., “Do Visual and Tactile Object Representations Share the Same Neural Substrate?,” in Heller, and Ballesteros, (eds.), Touch and Blindness, pp. 139–55.Google Scholar
Jay, Martin. Downcast Eyes: The Denigration of Vision in Twentieth-Century French Thought (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Judgment, in Kants gesammelte schriften (Berlin: Königliche Preußische Wissenschaften, 1902– ), vol. 5.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip. The Advancement of Science: Science without Legend, Objectivity without Illusions (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Knodt, Eva. “Dramatic Illusion in the Making of the Past: Shakespeare’s Impact on Herder’s Philosophy of History,” in Koepke, Wulf (ed.), Johann Gottfried Herder: Language, History and the Enlightenment (Columbia, SC: Camden House, 1990), pp. 209–23.Google Scholar
Koepke, Wulf. “Herder’s Views on the Germans and Their Future Literature,” in Adler, Hans and Koepke, Wulf (eds.), Companion to Herder, pp. 215–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsmeyer, Carolyn. Making Sense of Taste: Food and Philosophy (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Mark, Johnson. Metaphors We Live By (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lange, Horst. “‘Ich bin (k)ein Spinozist.’ Warum sich Herders Beruung auf Spinoza gewandelt hat,” in Groß, Sabine and Sauder, Gerhard (eds.), Der frühe und der späte Herder: Kontinuität und/oder Korrektur/Early and Late Herder: Continuity and/or Correction (Heidelberg: Synchron, 2007), pp. 253–65.Google Scholar
Lange, Horst. Laocoön; An Essay on the Limits of Painting and Poetry, trans. McCormick, Edward Allen (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Levin, Janet. “Molyneux’s Question and the Individuation of Perceptual Concepts,” Philosophical Studies 138 (2008), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyotard, Jean-François. Lessons on the Analytic of the Sublime, trans. Rottenberg, Elizabeth (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Lyotard, Jean-François. “Presenting the Unpresentable: The Sublime,” Artforum 20: 8 (1982), 64–70.Google Scholar
Macpherson, James. Poems of Ossian, ed. Gaskill, Howard (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Makkreel, Rudolf. Imagination and Interpretation in Kant (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Malsch, Wilfrid. “Herders Schrift über die Skulpturkunst in der Geschichte der Unterscheidung des Plastischen und Malerischen oder Musikalischen in Kunst und Literatur,” in Koepke, Wulf (ed.), Johann Gottfried Herder: Language, History, and the Enlightenment (Columbia, SC: Camden House, 1990), pp. 224–33.Google Scholar
Mauer, Michael. “Ganz Ohr; Zu Herders Theorie der Sinne als Grundlegung jeder Anthropologie,” Herder Jahrbuch 10 (2010), 57–72.Google Scholar
McDowell, John. Mind, Value, and Reality (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Meinecke, Friedrich. Historism: The Rise of a New Historical Outlook, trans. Anderson, J. E. (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1972).Google Scholar
Melville, Stephen. “Richard Serra: Taking the Measure of the Impossible,” Res 46 (2004), 185–201.Google Scholar
Mendelssohn, Moses. Philosophical Writings, ed. and trans. Dahlstrom, Daniel (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menke, Christoph. Force: A Fundamental Concept of Aesthetic Anthropology, trans. Jackson, Gerrit (New York: Fordham University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Monk, Samuel. The Sublime: A Study of Critical Theories in XVIIIth Century England (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1960).Google Scholar
Montero, Barbara. “Proprioception as an Aesthetic Sense,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 64 (2006), 231–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Dafydd. Ossian and Ossianism: Subcultures and Subversions 1750–1850 (New York: Routledge, 2004).Google Scholar
Morgan, Benjamin. “After the Arctic Sublime,” New Literary History 47: 1 (2016), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morton, Michael. Herder and the Poetics of Thought: On Unity and Diversity in “On Diligence in Several Learned Languages” (State College: Penn State University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Mülder-Bach, Inka. Im Zeichen Pygmalions. Das Modell der Statue und die Entdeckung der “Darstellung” im 18. Jahrhundert (Munich: Fink, 1998).Google Scholar
Muthu, Sankar. Enlightenment against Empire (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Nead, Lynda. The Female Nude: Art, Obscenity, and Sexuality (London: Routledge, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neer, Richard. The Emergence of Classical Style in Greek Sculpture (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, Barnett. “The Sublime Is Now” (1948), reprinted in Caws, Mary Ann (ed.), Manifesto (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Ngai, Sianne. Our Aesthetic Categories: Zany, Cute, Interesting (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Nisbet, H. B. Herder and Scientific Thought (Cambridge: Modern Humanities Research Association, 1970).Google Scholar
Norton, Robert. Herder’s Aesthetics and the European Enlightenment (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton, Robert. “The Myth of the Counter-Enlightenment,” Journal of the History of Ideas 68: 4 (2007), 635–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noyes, John K. Herder: Aesthetics against Imperialism (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papineau, David. “Naturalism,” in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, at plato.stanford.edu/entries/naturalism.Google Scholar
Porter, James. The Sublime in Antiquity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potts, Alex. The Sculptural Imagination: Figurative, Modernist, Minimalist (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Proß, Wolfgang. Johann Gottfried Herder Werke, vol. III/2: Kommentar (Munich: Hanser, 2002).Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. “Epistemology Naturalized,” in Ontological Relativity and Other Essays (New York: Columbia University Press, 1969), pp. 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. “Naturalism,” in From Stimulus to Science (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995), pp. 15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, Eugene E. “Herder, Primitivism and the Age of Poetry,” The Modern Language Review 60: 4 (1965), 553–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, Thomas. Inquiry into the Human Mind on the Principles of Common Sense, ed. Beanblossom, Ronald and Lehrer, Keith (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1983).Google Scholar
Renner, Kaspar, and Wagner, Ulrike. “Herder und die Philologie. Fünf Thesen zu einer produktiven Beziehung. Am Beispiel des Volkliedsprojekts,” Herder Jahrbuch/Yearbook 13 (2016), 13–41.Google Scholar
Riedel, Manfred. Kunst als “Auslegerin der Natur.” Naturästhetik und Hermeneutik in der klassischen deutschen Dichtung und Philosophie (Cologne: Böhlau, 2001).Google Scholar
Robinson, Jenefer. Deeper than Reason: Emotion and Its Role in Literature, Music, and Art (Oxford: Clarendon, 2007).Google Scholar
Robinson, Jenefer. “On Being Moved by Architecture,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 70: 4 (2012), 337–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schelling, F. W. J. The Philosophy of Art, trans. Stott, D. W. (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Schmidt, Alexander. “Scholarship, Morals, and Government: Jean-Henri-Samuel Formey’s and Johann Gottfried Herder’s Responses to Rousseau’s First Discourse,” Modern Intellectual History 9: 2 (2012), 249–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Johannes. “Herder’s Religious Anthropology in His Later Writings,” in Waldow, and DeSouza, (eds.), Herder: Philosophy and Anthropology, pp. 185–202.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Wolf Gerhard. “Paradigma des Sentimentalischen. Die Ossianrezeption des späten Herders,” in Groß, Sabine and Sauder, Gerhard (eds.), Der Frühe und der spate Herder: Kontinuität und/oder Korrektur/Early and Late Herder: Continuity and/or Correction (Heidelberg: Synchron, 2007), pp. 425–31.Google Scholar
Shapshay, Sandra. “Contemporary Environmental Aesthetics and the Neglect of the Sublime,” British Journal of Aesthetics 53: 2 (2013), 181–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiner, Larry, and Kriskovets, Yulia. “The Aesthetics of Smelly Art,” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 65 (2007), 273–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shusterman, Richard. “Somaesthetics: A Disciplinary Proposal,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 57 (1999), 299–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sikka, Sonia. Herder on Humanity and Cultural Difference: Enlightened Relativism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, David L. “Counter-Traditions in Herder Reception,” in Groß, Sabine (ed.), Herausforderung Herder/Herder as Challenge (Heidelberg: Synchron, 2010), pp. 59–71.Google Scholar
Spencer, Vicki A. Herder’s Political Thought: A Study of Language, Culture, and Community (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinby, Liisa. “Zur ‘Wissenschaflichkeit’ von Herders Methode,” Herder Jahrbuch/Yearbook 13 (2016), 103–28.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. “The Importance of Herder,” in Margalit, Edna and Margalit, Avishai (eds.), Isaiah Berlin: A Celebration (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991), pp. 40–63.Google Scholar
Terezakis, Katie. The Immanent Word: The Turn to Language in German Philosophy, 1759–1801 (New York: Routledge, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomä, Dieter. “Leben als Teilnehmen: Überlegungen im Anschluss an Johann Gottfried Herder,” Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 59 (2011), 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, Derick S. The Gaelic Sources of Macpherson’s “Ossian” (Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd, 1952).Google Scholar
Vance, Robert. “Sculpture,” British Journal of Aesthetics 35: 3 (1995), 217–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velkley, Richard. Being after Rousseau: Philosophy and Culture in Question (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Waldow, Anik, and DeSouza, Nigel (eds.). Herder: Philosophy and Anthropology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walton, Kendall. “Categories of Art,” The Philosophical Review 79 (1970), 334–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiskel, Thomas. The Romantic Sublime (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Catherine. “Another Darwinian Aesthetics,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 74: 3 (2016), 237–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wollheim, Richard. “On Pictorial Representation,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 56: 3 (1998), 217–26.Google Scholar
Yeager, Patricia. “Toward a Female Sublime,” in Kaufman, Linda (ed.), Gender and Theory: Dialogues on Feminist Criticism (Oxford: Blackwell, 1989), pp. 191–212.Google Scholar
Zammito, John. “Herder and Historical Metanarrative: What’s Philosophical about History?,” in Adler, and Koepke, (eds.), A Companion to the Works of Johann Gottfried Herder, pp. 65–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zammito, John. Kant, Herder and the Birth of Anthropology (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Zammito, John. “Die Rezeption der schottischen Aufklärung in Deutschland: Herders entscheidende Einsicht,” in Schmidt-Haberkamp, B., Steiner, U., and Wehinger, B. (eds.), Europäischer Kulturtransfer im 18. Jahrhundert (Berlin: Wissenschafts Verlag, 2003), pp. 113–38.Google Scholar
Zammito, John H., Menges, Karl, and Menze, Ernest A.. “Johann Gottfried Herder Revisited: The Revolution in Scholarship in the Last Quarter Century,” Journal of the History of Ideas 71 (2010), 661–84.Google Scholar
Zeuch, Ulrike. Umkehr der Sinneshierarchie. Herder und die Aufwertung des Tastsinns seit der frühen Neuzeit (Tübingen: Niemeyer, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuckert, Rachel. “Adaptive Naturalism in Herder’s Aesthetics: An Intepretation of ‘Shakespeare’,” Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 36: 2 (2015), 269–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuckert, Rachel. “The Associative Sublime: Gerard, Kames, Alison, and Stewart,” in Costelloe, Timothy (ed.), The Sublime (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp. 64–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuckert, Rachel. “Is There Kantian Art Criticism?,” in Bacin, Stefano, Ferrarin, Alfredo, della Rocca, Claudio, and Ruffing, Margit (eds.), Kant und die Philosophie in weltbürgerlicher Absicht; Akten des XI. Kant-Kongresses (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2013), 343–58.Google Scholar
Zuckert, Rachel. “Metaphysics and Organisms: Kant’s First Herder Review,” in Goy, Ina and Watkins, Eric (eds.), Kant’s Theory of Biology (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2014), pp. 61–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar