Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- List of cases
- List of legislation
- Introduction
- 1 Autonomy: variations on a principle
- 2 Autonomy in the law
- 3 Capacity: the gatekeeper for autonomy
- 4 Capacity assessment in practice
- 5 Autonomy, rights and decision-making for patients lacking capacity
- 6 Treatment for a mental disorder: a case apart?
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
3 - Capacity: the gatekeeper for autonomy
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 February 2011
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- List of cases
- List of legislation
- Introduction
- 1 Autonomy: variations on a principle
- 2 Autonomy in the law
- 3 Capacity: the gatekeeper for autonomy
- 4 Capacity assessment in practice
- 5 Autonomy, rights and decision-making for patients lacking capacity
- 6 Treatment for a mental disorder: a case apart?
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
The previous chapter showed that, while the law may reject ‘hard’ paternalism, ‘soft’ paternalism (intervention on the basis of incapacity) remains a fundamental component of the law's approach to healthcare decision-making. As several commentators have pointed out, the operation of the capacity requirement may conceal ‘hard’ paternalism or favour societal interests over those of the individual in a way which may, in fact, be more damaging to a person's autonomy in practice that an overt recognition of limits on the right. Accordingly, an understanding of capacity is essential in order to appreciate what the principle of autonomy means at a conceptual level and how it operates in individual cases.
In adopting any principles in respect of capacity, the law makes normative choices. In the words of the United States President's Commission:
[A] conclusion about a patient's decisionmaking capacity necessarily reflects a balancing of two important, sometimes competing objectives: to enhance the patient's well-being and to respect the person as a self-determining individual.
This chapter examines the normative choices which have been made by the law in respect of capacity. It outlines the features of the current legal standard for capacity in England and Wales as set out in the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) and evaluates these in terms of consistency with the liberal principle of autonomy, which is recognised as providing the basis for the law in respect of healthcare decision-making.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Healthcare Decision-Making and the LawAutonomy, Capacity and the Limits of Liberalism, pp. 90 - 130Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2010
References
, ‘Privileging the Medical Norm: Liberalism, Self-Determination and Refusal of Treatment’ (1996) 16 Legal Studies 348, 358–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Hard Cases Make Bad Law’ (1997) 23 Journal of Medical Ethics 341, 343CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, Rights, Duties and the Body: Law and Ethics of the Maternal-Fetal Conflict (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2002), pp. 161–2Google Scholar
and , Deciding for Others: The Ethics of Surrogate Decision Making (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989), p. 47Google Scholar
, ‘On the Evaluative Nature of Competency and Capacity Judgments’ (1990) 13 International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 309CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, Making Health Care Decisions: A Report on the Ethical and Legal Implications of Informed Consent in the Patient-Practitioner Relationship (Washington DC: US Superintendent of Documents, 1982), p. 57Google Scholar
(London, 1859) in Grey, John (ed.) On Liberty and Other Essays (Oxford University Press, 1991), p. 84Google Scholar
, Life's Dominion: An Argument About Abortion, Euthanasia, and Individual Freedom (New York: Alfred A Knopf, 1993), p. 225Google Scholar
et al., Mental Disability and the European Convention on Human Rights (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2007), Chapter 6Google Scholar
, ‘Legal Capacity Law Reform in Europe: An Urgent Challenge’ in G. Quinn and L. Waddington (eds.) European Yearbook of Disability Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2009)Google Scholar
et al, ‘Capacity to Make Financial Decisions among People With Mild Intellectual Disabilities’ (2005) 49 Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 199Google ScholarPubMed
and , ‘The MacArthur Treatment Competence Study I: Mental Illness and Competence to Consent to Treatment’ (1995) 19 Law and Human Behaviour 105CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
et al., ‘Capacity-Based Mental Health Legislation and its Impact on Clinical Practice: 2) Treatment in Hospital’ (2003) Journal of Mental Health Law24Google Scholar
et al., ‘Mental Capacity to Make Decisions on Treatment in People Admitted to Psychiatric Hospitals: Cross Sectional Study’ (2008) 337 British Medical Journal 40CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, Practical Treatise on the Law Concerning Lunatics, Idiots, and Persons of Unsound Mind (Philadelphia: J. S. Littell, 1833), p. 23Google Scholar
, and , ‘Tests of Competency to Consent to Treatment’ (1977) 134 American Journal of Psychiatry 279Google ScholarPubMed
et al, ‘The MacArthur Treatment Competence Study II: Measures of Abilities Related to Competence to Consent to Treatment’ (1995) 19 Law and Human Behaviour 127Google ScholarPubMed
and , ‘The MacArthur Treatment Competence Study III: Abilities of Patients to Consent to Psychiatric and Medical Treatments’ (1995) 19 Law and Human Behaviour 149Google ScholarPubMed
and , ‘Assessing the Patient's Competence to Consent to Medical Treatment’ (1996) 2 Medical Law International 107CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and , ‘The Inadequacy of Incompetence’ (1990) 68 The Milbank Quarterly 619CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, Life's Dominion, p. 239. A similar argument may be made about the Kantian view of rationality as morality as described in O. O' Neill, Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics (Cambridge University Press, 2002), p. 85Google Scholar
, ‘Silencing the Different Voice: Competence, Feminist Theory and Law’ (1993) 47 University of Miami Law Review 763¸ 772Google Scholar
and , ‘Courts, Gender and the Right to Die’ (1990) 18 Law, Medicine and Healthcare 85Google ScholarPubMed
, The Man of Reason: ‘Male’ and ‘Female’ in Western Philosophy (London: Metheun Publishing, 1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , Assessing Competence to Consent: A Guide for Physicians and Other Health Professionals (New York: Oxford University Press, 1998)Google Scholar
, ‘Assessment of Patients’ Competence to Consent to Treatment' (2007) 357 New England Journal of Medicine 1834CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, ‘Is Mr Spock Mentally Competent?: Competence to Consent and Emotion’ (1998) 5 Philosophy, Psychiatry and Psychology 67Google Scholar
, ‘Refusal of Medical Treatment in “‘Captive” Circumstances’ (1985) 63 Canadian Bar Review 59, 65–8Google Scholar
, ‘Refining Definitions and Devising Instruments: Two Decades of Assessing Mental Competence’ (1997) 20 International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 5, 20–3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(First Report of the Joint Committee on the Draft Mental Health Bill (HL Paper 79–1; HC 95–1) (London: The Stationery Office, 2005), para. 153Google Scholar
, Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain (New York: Grosset/Putnam, 1994)Google Scholar
, Bioethics, Culture and Identity: A Philosophical Disease (New York: Routledge, 1999)Google Scholar
, ‘Depression and Competence to Refuse Psychiatric Treatment’ (2002) 28 Journal of Medical Ethics 155CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and , ‘The Cognitive-Based Approach of Capacity Assessment in Psychiatry: A Philosophical Critique of the MacCAT-T’ (2004) 12 Health Care Analysis 273CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, ‘Ought We to Require Emotional Capacity as a Part of Decisional Competence?’ (1999) 8 Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 377, 385Google Scholar
and , A History and Theory of Informed Consent (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986), p. 265Google Scholar
, ‘Autonomy, Guardianship and Mental Disorder: One Problem, Two Solutions’ (2002) 65 Modern Law Review 702, 705CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, ‘Competence to Refuse Life-Sustaining Medical Treatment’ (1994) 110 Law Quarterly Review 541, 545Google Scholar
, Vulnerable Adults and the Law: Capacity (LRC CP 37–2005) (Dublin: Law Reform Commission, 2005), para. 7.18Google Scholar
et al., ‘Constructing Competence: Formulating Standards of Legal Competence to Make Medical Decisions’ (1996) 48 Rutgers Law Review 345, 352–62Google ScholarPubMed
, Mentally Incapacitated Adults and Decision-Making: Medical Treatment and Research, (London: HMSO, 1993), pp. 18–19Google Scholar
and , ‘The Role and Assessment of Mental Incapacity: A Review’ (2000) 13 Current Opinion in Psychiatry 557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Blackstone's Guide to the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (2nd edn) (Oxford University Press, 2008), p. 51Google Scholar
, ‘Patient Decision-Making Capacity and Risk’ (1991) 5 Bioethics 91, 103–4, original emphasisCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, ‘The Debate Over Risk-Related Standards of Competence’ (1997) 11 Bioethics 413, 418CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, ‘Risk-Related Standards of Competence: Continuing the Debate Over Risk-Related Standards of Competence’ (1999) 13 Bioethics 132, 140–1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
et al., ‘Prevalence of Mental Incapacity in Medical Inpatients and Associated Risk Factors: Cross-Sectional Study’ (2004) 364 Lancet 1421CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
et al., ‘Decision Making Capacity of Inpatients With Schizophrenia in Hong Kong’ (2005) 193 Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 316CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
et al., ‘Competency to Decide About Treatment or Research’ (1982) 5 International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 279CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
et al., The Erosion of Autonomy in Long-Term Care (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992)Google Scholar
et al., ‘Mental Capacity in Psychiatric Patients: Systematic Review’ (2007) 191 British Journal of Psychiatry 291, 294CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, ‘Labelling Patient (In)Competence: A Feminist Analysis of Medico-Legal Discourse’ (1999) 30 Journal of Social Philosophy 295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
et al., ‘Prevalence and Predictors of Mental Incapacity in Psychiatric In-Patients’ (2005) 187 British Journal of Psychiatry 379, 383Google ScholarPubMed
et al., Systematic Review of Research Relating to the Mental Health Act 1983 (London: Department of Health, 1999)Google Scholar
, ‘Race, Competence Testing and Disability Law: A Review of the MacArthur Competence Research’ (1996) 2 Psychology, Public Policy and Law 31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
et al., ‘Everybody's Got a Little Mental Illness: Accounts of Illness and Self Among People With Severe Persistent Mental Illness’ (1991) 5 Medical Anthropology Quarterly 331, 357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, No Longer Patient: Feminist Ethics and Health Care (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1992), pp. 156–7Google Scholar
, ‘Feminist Ethic of Care: A Third Alternative Approach’ (2004) 12 Health Care Analysis 317CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, ‘Practice in Focus: A Hermeneutic Approach to Research Ethics’ (2004) 32 British Journal of Learning Disabilities 186, 186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , ‘Competence in Mental Health Care: A Hermeneutic Perspective’ (2004) 12 Health Care Analysis 295, 298, original emphasisCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, ‘The Right to Refuse Mental Health Treatment: A Therapeutic Jurisprudence Analysis’ (1994) 17 International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 99, 100CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (eds.) Law in a Therapeutic Key: Developments in Therapeutic Jurisprudence (Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press, 1996)Google Scholar
, ‘Therapeutic Jurisprudence: Five Dilemmas to Ponder’ (1995) Psychology, Public Policy and Law1933Google Scholar
and , ‘Therapeutic Jurisprudence: Informed Consent as a Clinical Indication for the Chronically Suicidal Patient With Borderline Personality Disorder’ (1998) 31 Loyola of Los Angelus Law Review 945, 978–81Google ScholarPubMed
, ‘The Side Effects of Incompetency Labelling and the Implications for Mental Health Law’ (1995) 1 Psychology, Public Policy and Law 6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The MacArthur Treatment Competence Study: Legal and Therapeutic Implications’ (1996) 2 Psychology, Public Policy and Law 137, 151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Legal Capacity in the Disability Rights Convention: Stranglehold of the Past or Lodestar for the Future?’ (2006–2007) 34 Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce 429Google Scholar
, ‘Disabling Progress: The Law Commission's Proposals on Mentally Incapacitated Adults’ Decision-Making' (1993) 15 Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 304, 313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Statutory Authority to Treat, Relatives and Treatment Proxies’ (1994) 2 Medical Law Review 30, 36CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, ‘Proof of Mental Incompetency and the Unexpressed Major Premise’ (1944) 53 Yale Law Journal 271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law: Vol III: Harm to Self (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986), pp. 118–19Google Scholar
, ‘Restoring Moral and Intellectual Shape to the Law after Bland’ (1997) 113 Law Quarterly Review 481Google ScholarPubMed
, Rethinking Life and Death: The Collapse of Our Traditional Ethics (New York: OUP, 1994), p. 75Google Scholar
, ‘Finding a Way through the Ethical and Legal Maze: Withdrawal of Medical Treatment and Euthanasia’ (2005) 13 Medical Law Review 357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , ‘Coercion or Caring: Analysing Adolescent Autonomy’ (1996) 16 Legal Studies 84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
et al., ‘Anorexia Nervosa and Personal Identity: The Accounts of Patients and Their Parents’ (2003) 26 International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 533CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
et al., ‘Competence to Refuse Treatment in Anorexia’ (2003) 26 International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 697CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
et al., ‘Competence to Make Treatment Decisions in Anorexia Nervosa: Thinking Processes and Values’ (2006) 13 Philosophy, Psychology and Psychiatry 267Google ScholarPubMed
, ‘Depression and Competence to Refuse Psychiatric Treatment’ (2002) 28 Journal of Medical Ethics 155CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
et al., ‘To Empower or to Protect? Constructing the “Vulnerable Adult” in English Law and Public Policy’ (2008) 28 Legal Studies 234, 236–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Choice, Culture and the Politics of Belonging: The Emerging Law of Forced and Arranged Marriage’ (2009) 72 Modern Law Review 331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Protecting Vulnerable Adults: A Critical Review of Recent Case Law’ (2009) 21 Child and Family Law Quarterly 498Google Scholar