Gynecologic Surgery

Guntapalli, SR, Doo, DW, Guy, M et al. Preparedness of obstetrics and gynecology residents for fellowship training. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Sep; 126(3):559–68.Google Scholar

Committee on Practice Bulletins – Gynecology, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 84. Prevention of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Aug; 110(2 Part 1):421–40.Google Scholar

Bergqvist, D, Agnelli, G, Cohen, AT et al. Duration of prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism with enoxaparin after surgery for cancer. ENOXACAN II Investigators. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:975–80.Google Scholar

Committee on Practice Bulletins – Gynecology, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 104: Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Gynecologic Procedures. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 May; 113(5):1180–9.Google Scholar

Bratzler, DW, Houck, PM. Surgical infection prevention guideline writers workgroup. Am J Surg. 2005 Apr;189(4):395–404. Review.Google Scholar

Mizell, JS. Principles of Abdominal Wall Closure. Chen, W (Ed.), Waltham, MA (Accessed on February 12, 2016).Google Scholar

Niggebrugge, A, Trimbos, JB, Hermans, J, Steup, W, Van De Velde, C. Influence on abdominal-wound closure technique on complications after surgery: a randomized study. Lancet 1999 May 8; 353(9164):1563–7.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ceydeli, A, Rucinski, J, Wise, L. Finding the best abdominal closure: an evidence-based review of the literature. Current Surg. 2005 Mar–Apr; 62(2):220–5.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Wood, RM, Simon, H, Oz, AU. Pelosi-type vs. traditional cesarean delivery: a prospective comparison. J Reprod Med. 1999; 44(9):788.Google Scholar

Holmgren, G, Sjöholm, L, Stark, M. The Misgav Ladach method for cesarean section: method description. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1999; 78(7):615.Google Scholar

Shi, Z, Ma, L, Yang, Y et al. Adhesion formation after previous caesarean section: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 118:410.Google Scholar

Walsh, TM, Sangi-Haghpeykar, H, Ng, V, Zurawin, R, Guan, X. Hand assisted laparoscopy for large uteri. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Nov–Dec;22(7):1231–6.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gray, JE. Nerve Injury Associated with Pelvic Surgery. Chen, W (Ed.). Waltham, MA. (Accessed on February 12, 2016.)Google Scholar

Nezhat History of Endoscopy, Society for Laparoscopy Surgeons. http://sls.org/project/nezhats-history-of-endoscopy/Google Scholar

Daniilidis, A, Hatzis, P, Pratilas, G, Loufopoulos, PD Dinas, K. Laparoscopy in Gynecology; How, Why, When, ed. Darwish, A, Chapter 3 – in Advanced gynecologic endoscopy. 2011 Retrieved from www.intechopen.com/books/advanced-gynecologic-endoscopy Google Scholar

Page, BJ, Ocampo, J, Nutis, M, Luciano, AA. History of modern operative laparoscopy. In: 2008 Nezhat’s Operative Gynecologic Laparoscopy and Hysteroscopy, 3rd ed. Nezhat, Camran, Nezhat, Farr, and Nezhat, Ceana. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hippocrates. The Art of Medicine, Mann, JE, March 2012, 9789004224292.Google Scholar

ACOG Committee Opinion No. 439. Informed Consent, 2009; 114:401–8.Google Scholar

Childers, R, Lipsett, PA, Pawlik, TM. Informed consent and the surgeon. J Am Coll. Surg 2009; 208(4):627–34.Google Scholar

ACOG. You asked we answer (informed consent).Google Scholar

Making health care safer II: an updated critical analysis of the evidence for patient safety practices, Evidence Reports/Technology Assessments, No. 211. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 2013. Report No.: 13-E001-EF.Google Scholar

Joint Commission, Universal Protocol 2016 National Patient Safety Goals, www.jointcommission.org/standards_information/npsgs.aspx Google Scholar

Cabras F, Lazzara F, Ristovich L, Lever M, Pignata G. Chapter 8, Gynecology in Laparoscopic Surgery. Pignata G, Bracale U, Lazzara F, eds. 2016 Springer International Publishing, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar

Gerges, FJ, Kanazi, GE, Jabbour Khoury, SI. Anesthesia for laparoscopy: a review. J Clin Anesth. 2006 Feb; 18(1):67–78.Google Scholar

Sukhu, T, Krupski, TL. Patient positioning and prevention of injuries in patients undergoing laparoscopic and robot-assisted urologic procedures. Curr Urol Rep. 2014 Apr;15(4):398. doi: 10.1007/s11934-014-0398-1.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Arnold, A, Aitchison, LP, Abbott, J. Preoperative mechanical bowel preparation for abdominal, laparoscopic, and vaginal surgery: a systematic review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Jul–Aug;22(5):737–52. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.04.003. Epub Apr 13, 2015.Google Scholar

Shaher, Z. Port closure techniques. Surg Endosc. 2007 Aug;21(8):1264–74. Epub Feb 7, 2007.Google Scholar

Ahmad, G, Gent, D, Henderson, D, O’Flynn, H, Phillips, K. Laparoscopic entry techniques. Watson: A Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 31;8:CD006583. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006583.pub4.Google Scholar

Binda, MM. Humidification during laparoscopic surgery: overview of the clinical benefits of using humidified gas during laparoscopic surgery. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Nov;292(5):955–71. doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3717-y. Epub Apr 25, 2015.Google Scholar

Yu, T, Chen, Y, Wang, X, et al. Gases for establishing pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2017(6), doi:10.1002/14651858.CD009569.pub3.Google Scholar

Speakers give sound advice. Syracuse Post Standard, p. 18. March 28, 1911.Google Scholar

Pneumoperitoneum Ott D. http://laparoscopy.blogs.com/prevention_management_3rd edition.Google Scholar

Wamsteker, K. Documentation in laparoscopic surgery. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1989 Sep;3(3):625–47.Google Scholar

Indman, PD. Documentation in endoscopy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1995 Sep;22(3):605–16.Google Scholar

la Chapelle, CF, Swank, HA, Wessels, ME, Mol, BW, Rubinstein, SM, Jansen, FW. Trocar types in laparoscopy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec;16;12:CD009814. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009814.pub2.Google Scholar

Chapron, C, Querleu, D, Bruhat, MA et al. Surgical complications of diagnostic and operative gynaecological laparoscopy: a series of 29,966 cases. Hum Reprod. 1998 Apr;13(4):867–72.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gandhi, TK, Sittig, DF, Franklin, M, Sussman, AJ, Fairchild, DG, Bates, DW. Communication breakdown in the outpatient referral process. J Gen Intern Med. 2000 Sep;15(9): 626–631. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.91119.x PMCID: PMC1495590Google Scholar

Postoperative care – WHO www.who.int/surgery/publications/Postoperativecare.pdf Google Scholar

Medeiros, L. R., Rosa, D. D., Bozzetti, M. C. et al. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for benign ovarian tumor. Coch Database of Sys Rev 2009:CD004751.Google Scholar

Papasakelariou, C., Saunders, D., De La Rosa. Comparative study of laparoscopic oophorectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1995; 2(4): 407–10.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lundorff, P., Hahlin, M., Thorburn, B. et al. Adhesion formation after laparoscopic surgery in tubal pregnancy: a randomized trial versus laparotomy. Fertil Steril 1991; 55(5): 911–15.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ivarsson, M. L., Holmdahl, L., Franzen, G., Risberg, B.. Cost of bowel obstruction resulting from adhesions. Eur J Surg 1997; 163(9): 679–84.Google Scholar

Vergote, I., De Brabanter, J., Fyles, A. et al. Prognostic importance of degree of differentiation and cyst rupture in stage I invasive epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Lancet 2001; 357: 176–2.Google Scholar

Gomel, V.. Laparoscopy. Can Med Assoc J 1974; 111(2): 167–9.Google Scholar

Sisodia, R.M., Del Carmen, M.G., Boruta, D.M.. Role of minimally invasive surgery in the management of adnexal masses. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2015; 58(1): 66–75.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Broach, A. N., Mansuria, S. M., Sanfilippo, J.. Pediatric and adolescent gynecologic laparoscopy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2009; 52(3): 380–9.Google Scholar

Rieger, M. M., Santos, X. M., Sangi-Haghpeykar, H. et al. Laparoscopic outcomes for pelvic pathology in children and adolescents among patients presenting to the pediatric and adolescent gynecology service. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2015; 28(3): 157–62.Google Scholar

Snyder, T., Selanders, J.. Incidental appendectomy – yes or no? A retrospective case study and review of the literature. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 1998; 6: 30–7.3.0.CO;2-B>CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gustofson, R., Kim, N., Liu, S. et al. Endometriosis and the appendix: a case series and comprehensive review of the literature. Fertil Steril 2006; 86: 298–303.Google Scholar

Turrentine, F. E., Wang, H., Simpson, V. B., Jones, R. S.. Surgical risk factors, morbidity, and mortality in elderly patients. J Am Coll Surg 2006; 203: 865–77.Google Scholar

Qaseem, A., Snow, V., Fitterman, N. et al. Risk assessment for and strategies to reduce perioperative pulmonary complications for patients undergoing noncardiothoracic surgery: a guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 2006; 144(8): 575–80.Google Scholar

Parker, D. Y., Burke, J. J. II, Gallup, D. G.. Gynecological surgery in octogenarians and nonagenarians. A J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190(5): 1401–3.Google Scholar

Scheib, S. A., Tanner, E. III, Green, I. C. et al. Laparoscopy in the morbidly obese patient: physiologic considerations and surgical techniques to optimize success. J Min Invas Gynecol 2009; 21(2): 182–95.Google Scholar

Bensley, R. P., Schermerhorn, M. L., Hurks, R. et al. Risk of late-onset adhesions and incisional hernias after surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2013; 216(6): 1159–67.Google Scholar

Agarwala, N., Liu, C. Y.. Safe entry techniques during laparoscopy: Left upper quadrant entry using the ninth intercostal space: a review of 918 procedures. J Min Invas Gynecol 2005; 12(1): 55–61.Google Scholar

Bohmer, A. B., Wappler, F., Zwissler, B.. Preoperative risk assessment: from routine tests to individualized investigation. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2014; 111(25): 437–46.Google Scholar

Manley, S., de Kelaita, G., Joseph, N. J. et al. Preoperative pregnancy testing in ambulatory surgery: incidence and impact of positive results. Anes 1995; 83(4): 690–3.Google Scholar

Philips, P. A., Amaral, J. A.. Abdominal access complications in laparoscopic surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2001; 192(4): 525–36.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Nordestgaard, A. G., Bodily, K. C., Obsorne, R. W.. Major vascular injuries during laparoscopic procedures. Am J Surg 1995; 169: 543–5.Google Scholar

Coskun, F., Salman, M. A.. Anesthesia for operative endoscopy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2001; 13(4): 371–6.Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists: Antibiotic prophylaxis for gynecologic procedures. Practice Bulletin No. 104, May 2009a.Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists: Prevention of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Practice Bulletin No. 84, August 2007.Google Scholar

Geerts, W. H., Pineo, G. F., Heit, J. A. et al. Prevention of venous thromboembolism: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Chest 2004; 124(Suppl): 338–400S.CrossRef Google Scholar

Abbott, C. Sutton. History of power sources in endoscopic surgery. J Min Invas Gynecol 2013; 20: 271–8.Google Scholar

Law, K., Lyons, S.. Comparative studies of energy sources in gynecologic laparoscopy. J Min Invas Gynecol 2013; 20: 308–18.Google Scholar

Ahmad, G., Gent, D., Henderson, D, O’Flynn, H, Phillips, K, Watson, A. Laparoscopic entry techniques. Cochrane Database Sys Rev 2015(8): CD006583. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006583.pub4.Google Scholar

Phillips, J. M Complications in laparoscopy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1977; 15: 157–62.Google Scholar

Levinson, C.. Laparoscopy is easy – except for the complications: a review with suggestions. J Rep Med 1974; 5: 187–94.Google Scholar

Chapron, C Pierre, F Harchaoui, Y et al. Gastrointestinal injuries during gynaecological laparoscopy. Hum Reprod 1999 Feb; 14(2): 333–7.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Findley, A. D., Solnik, M. J. Prevention and management of urologic injury during gynecologic laparoscopy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2016; 28: 323–8.Google Scholar

van Dongen, H, de Kroon, C, Jacobi, C et al. Diagnostic hysteroscopy in abnormal uterine bleeding: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Br J Obstet Gynecol 2007;114:664–75.Google Scholar

Valle, RF. Development of hysteroscopy: from a dream to a reality and its linkage to the present and future. J Min Invasive Gynecol 2007:14:407–18.CrossRef Google Scholar

Clark, TJ, Voit, D, Gupta, JK et al. Accuracy of hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of endometrial cancer and hyperplasia, a systematic quantitative review. J Am Med Assoc 2002;288:1610–21.Google Scholar

Brooks, PG. In the management of abnormal uterine bleeding, is office hysteroscopy preferable to sonography? The case for hysteroscopy. J Min Invasive Gynecol 2007;14:12–4.Google Scholar

Kim, A, Kim, H, Oh, S et al. A prospective comparison of the biopsy results from curettage and hysteroscopy in postmenopausal uterine bleeding. J Min Invasive Gynecol 2014;21:S143.Google Scholar

Fried, W, Bernstein, R, Krim, E et al. Comprehensive Pocket Atlas of Hysteroscopy. Canada: Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2011, p. 34.Google Scholar

Corson, SL, Hoffman, JJ, Jackowski, J, Chapman, GA. Cardiopulmonary effects of direct venous CO₂ insufflation in ewes: a model for CO₂ hysteroscopy. J Reprod Med 1988;33: 440–4.Google Scholar

Corson, SL, Brooks, PG, Soderstrom, RM. Gynecologic endoscopic gas embolism. Fertil Steril 1996;65:529–33.Google Scholar

Pellicano, M, Guida, M, Zullo, F et al. Carbon dioxide versus normal saline as a uterine distention medium for diagnostic vaginoscopic hysteroscopy in infertile patients: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study. Fertil Steril 2003;79:418–21.Google Scholar

Garry, R, Hasham, F, Manmohan, SK, Mooney, P. The effect of pressure on fluid absorption during endometrial ablation. J Gynecol Surg 1992;8:1–10.Google Scholar

Emanuel, MH, Hart, A, Wamsteker, K, Lammes, F. An analysis of fluid loss during transcervical resection of submucous myomas. Fertil Steril 1997;68:881–6.Google Scholar

Boyd, HR, Stanley, C. Sources of error when tracking irrigation fluids during hysteroscopic procedures. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2000;7:472–6.Google Scholar

Nezhat, CH, Fisher, DT, Datta, S. Investigation of often reported ten percent hysteroscopy fluid overfill: Is this accurate? J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2007;14:489–93.Google Scholar

Nagele, F, Bournas, N, O’Connor, H et al. Comparison of carbon dioxide and normal saline for uterine distention in outpatient hysteroscopy. Fertil Steril 1996;65:305–9.Google Scholar

Groenman, FA, Peters, LW, Rademaker, BM, Bakkum, EA. Embolism of air and gas in hysteroscopic procedures: pathophysiology and implication for daily practice. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2008;15:241–7.Google Scholar

Federico, H, Enrique, CF, Ramon, C. Diagnostic and Operative Hysteroscopy. United Kingdom: Anshan; 2007, pp. 167–78.Google Scholar

Jansen, FW, Vredevoogd, CB, Ulzen, KV et al. Complications of hysteroscopy: a prospective, multicenter study. Obstet Gynecol 2000;96:266–70.Google Scholar PubMed

Ayus, JC, Wheeler, JM, Arieff, AI. Postoperative hyponatremic encephalopathy in menstruant women. Ann Intern Med 1992;117:891–7.Google Scholar

Kumar, A, Kumar, A. A simple technique to reduce fluid intravsation during endometrial resection. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2004;11:83–5.Google Scholar

AAGL Practice Report. Practice guidelines for the management of hysteroscopic distending media. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2013;20:137–48.Google Scholar

Kerkvoorde, TC, Veersema, S, Timmermans, A. Long-term complication of office hysteroscopy: analysis of 1028 cases. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2012;19:494–7.Google Scholar

Cooper, NA, smith, P, Khan, KS, Clark, TJ. Vaginoscopic approach to outpatient hysteroscopy: a systemic review of the effect on pain. Br J Obstet Gynecol 2010;117:532–9.CrossRef Google Scholar

Deffieux, X, Gauthier, T, Menager, N et al. Hysteroscopy: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians. Europ J Obst Gynecol and Reprod Biol 2014;178:114–22.Google Scholar

Angioli, R, De Cicco Nardone, C, Plotti, F et al. Use of music to reduce anxiety during office hysteroscopy: prospective randomized trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2014;21:454–9.Google Scholar

Shveiky, D, Rojansky, N, Revel, A et al. Complications of hysteroscopic surgery: “Beyond the learning curve”. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2007;14:218–22.Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Hysteroscopy, technology assessment in obstetrics and gynecology no. 7. Obstet Gynecol 2011;117:1486–91.Google Scholar

Phillips, DR, Nathanson, HG, Milim, SJ, Haselkorn, JS. The effect of dilute vasopressin solution on the force needed for cervical dilation: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 1997 Apr;89:507–11.Google Scholar

Munro, MG. Mechanisms of thermal injury to the lower genital tract with radiofrequency resectosopic surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2006;13:36–42.Google Scholar

Agostini, A, Cravello, L, Shojai, R et al. Postoperative infection and surgical hysteroscopy. Fertil Steril 2002;77:766–8.Google Scholar

Kasius, JC, Broekmans, FJ, Fauser, BC et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis for hysteroscopy evaluation of the uterine cavity. Fertil Steril 2011;95:792–4.Google Scholar

Yazbeck, C, Dahinaut, C, Batallan, A et al. Diagnostic hysteroscopy and risk of peritoneal dissemination of tumor cell. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 2005;33:247–52.Google Scholar

Patil, E, Jensen, JT. Update on permanent contraception options for women. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2015;27:465–70.Google Scholar

Finer, LB, Henshaw, SK. Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2006;38:90–6.Google Scholar

Mosher, WD, Jones, J, Abma, JC. Intended and unintended births in the United States: 1982–2010. Natl Health Stat Report 2012;55:1–27. www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr055.pdf. Retrieved January 18, 2016.Google Scholar

Daniels, K, Daugherty, J, Jones, J, Mosher, W. Current contraceptive use and variation by selected characteristics among women age 15–44: United States, 2011–2013. Natl Health Stat Report 2012;86:1–14. Available at: www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr086.pdf. Retrieved January 18, 2016.Google Scholar

ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 133. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Benefits and risks of sterilization. Obstet Gynecol 2013;121:392–404.Google Scholar

Rice, MS, Murphy, MA, Vitonis, AF et al. Tubal ligation, hysterectomy, and epithelial ovarian cancer in the New England case-control study. Inter Cancer 2013;133:2415–21.Google Scholar

Madsen, C, Baandrup, L, Dehlendorff, C, Kjaer, SK. Tubal ligation and salpingectomy and the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer and borderline ovarian tumors: a nationwide case-control study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2015;94:86–94.Google Scholar

Creinin, MD, Zite, N. Female tubal sterilization: the time has come to routinely consider removal. Obstet Gynecol 2014;124:596–9.Google Scholar

Narod, SA, Sun, P, Ghadirian, P et al. Tubal ligation and risk of ovarian cancer in carriers of BRCA 1 or BRCA 2 mutations: a case control study. Lancet 2001;357:1467–70.Google Scholar

ACOG Committee Opinion No. 620. Salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention. Obstet Gynecol 2015;125:279–81.Google Scholar

Kwon, KS, McAlpine, JN, Hanley, GE, et al. Costs and benefits of opportunistic salpingectomy as an ovarian cancer prevention strategy. Obstet Gynecol 2015;125;338–45.Google Scholar

Levgur, M, Duvivier, R. Pelvic inflammatory disease after tubal sterilization: a review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2000;55:41–50.Google Scholar

Bartz, D, Greenberg, JA. Sterilization in the United States. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2008;1:23–32.Google Scholar

Curtis, KM, Mohllajee, AP, Peterson, HB. Regret following female sterilization at a young age: a systematic review. Contraception 2006;73:205–10.Google Scholar

Schmidt, EO, Diedrich, JT, Eisenberg, DL. Surgical procedures for tubal sterilization. Glob. libr. Women’s Med. 2014. DOI 10.3843/GLOWM.10400Google Scholar

Peterson, HB, Xia, Z, Hughes, JM, Wilcox, LS, Taylor, LR, Trussell, J. The risk of pregnancy after tubal sterilization: findings from the U.S collaborative review of sterilization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;174:1161–70.Google Scholar

Bollapragada, SS, Bandyopadhyay, S, Serle, E, Baird, C. Spontaneous pregnancy after bilateral salpingectomy. Fertil Steril 2005;83:767–8.Google Scholar

Rodriguez, MI, Edelman, AB, Kapp, N. Postpartum sterilization with the titanium clip: a systemic review. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118:143–7.Google Scholar

Penfield, AJ. The Filshie clip for female sterilization: a review of world experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;182:485–9.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Dominik, R, Gates, D, Sokal, D et al. Two randomized controlled trials comparing the hulka and filshie clips for tubal sterilization. Contraception 2000;62(4):169–76.Google Scholar

Peterson, HB, Xia, Z, Hughes, JM et al. The risk for ectopic pregnancy after tubal sterilization. N Engl J Med 1997;336:762–7.Google Scholar

Malacova, E, Kemp, A, Hart, R, Jama-Alol, K, Preen, DB. Long-term risk of ectopic pregnancy varies by method of tubal sterilization: a whole–population study. Fertil Steril 2014;101:728–34.Google Scholar

Adelman, MR, Dassel, MW, Sharp, HT. Management of complications encountered with Essure hysteroscopic sterilization: a systematic review. J Minn Invasive Gynecol 2014;21:733–43.Google Scholar

Moss, C, Isley, M. Sterilization: a review and update. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am 2015;42:713–24.Google Scholar

Essure instructions for use, www.essuremd.com/App_Themes/BaseTheme/PDFs/Link%20Essure%20IFU.pdf. Retrieved June 3, 2014.Google Scholar

www.fda.gov/downloads/medicaldevices/productsandmedicalprocedures/implantsandprosthetics/essurepermanentbirthcontrol/ucm488065.pdf. Retrieved August 27, 2017.Google Scholar

Basinski, CM. A review of clinical data for currently approved hysteroscopic sterilization procedures. Rev Obstet Gynecol 2010;3:101–10.Google Scholar

Povedano, B, Arjona, JE, Velasco, E, Monserrat, JA, Lorente, J, Castelo-Branco, C. Complications of hysteroscopic Essure(®)sterilisation: report on 4306 procedures performed in a single centre. Br J Obstet Gynecol 2012;119:795–9.Google Scholar

Jamieson, DJ, Hillis, SD, Duerr, A, Marchbanks, PA, Costello, C, Peterson, HB. Complications of Interval laparoscopic tubal sterilization: findings from the United States Collaborative Review of Sterilization. Obstet Gynecol 2000;96:997–1002.Google Scholar

Rios-Castillo, Velasco E, Arjona-Berral, JE, Povedano-Canizares, B, Castelo-Branco, C. Efficacy of Essure hysteroscopy sterilization – 5 years follow up of 1200 women. Gynecol Endolcrinol 2013;29(6):580–582.Google Scholar

Peterson, HB, Xia, Z, Wilcox, LS et al. US collaborative review of sterilization working group. Pregnancy after tubal sterilization with silicone rubber band and spring clip application. Obstet Gynecol 2001;94:205–10.Google Scholar

Pölcher, M, Hauptmann, S, Fotopoulou, C et al. Opportunistic salpingectomies for the prevention of a high-grade serous carcinoma: a statement by the Kommission Ovar of the AGO. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2015;292:231–4.Google Scholar

Levy, B, Levie, MD, Childers, ME. A summary of reported pregnancies after hysteroscopic sterilization. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2007;14:271–4.Google Scholar

ACOG Committee Opinion No. 615. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Access to contraception. Obstet Gynecol 2015;125:250-Google Scholar

FDA Essure risks and benefits, www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/ImplantsandProsthetics/EssurePermanentBirthControl/ucm452254.html. Retrieved March 8, 2016.Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, “Choosing the route of hysterectomy for benign disease: ACOG Committee Opinion No. 444,” Obstetrics and Gynecology 2009;114:1156–8.Google Scholar

Johanna, A., Nieboer, J., Emma, T., Garry, R., Mol, B. W., and Kluivers, K., “Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease (review),” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015 (8), doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub5.Google Scholar

Wright, J. D., Herzog, T. J., Jennifer, T., Ananth, C. V., Lewin, S. N., Lu, Y.-S., Neugut, A. I., and Hershman, D. L., “Nationwide trends in the performance of inpatient hysterectomy in the United States,” Obstetrics and Gynecology 2013;122:233–41.Google Scholar

Vrunda, B, Desai, MD, Xiao, X. An update on inpatient hysterectomy routes in the United States. American Journal Obstetrics and Gynecology 2015;213(5):742–43Google Scholar

Kovak, R. S., “Route of hysterectomy: an evidence-based approach,” Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 2014;57:58–71.Google Scholar

Figueiredo, O., Figueiredo, P., Figueiredo, P., Pelosi, M., and Pelosi, M., “Vaginal removal of the benign nonprolapsed uterus: experience with 300 consecutive operations,” Obstetrics and Gynecology 1999;94:348–51.Google Scholar

Agostini, A., Bretelle, F., Cravello, L., Maisonneuve, A. S., Roger, V., and Blanc, B., “Vaginal hysterectomy in nulliparous women without prolapse: a prospective comparative study,” British Joural of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2003;5:515–18.Google Scholar

Muffly, T. M. and Kow, N. S., “Effect of obesity on patients undergoing vaginal hysterectomy,” Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 2014;21:168–75.Google Scholar

Agostini, A., Vejux, N., Colette, E., Bretelle, F., Cravello, L., and Blanc, B., “Risk of bladder injury during vaginal hysterectomy in women with a previous cesarean section,” Journal of Reproductive Medicine 2005;50:940–2.Google Scholar

Jones, H. and Rock, J. A., Operative Gynecology. Philadelphia: Walters Kluver, 2015.Google Scholar

Kulkarni, M. M. and Rogers, R. G., “Vaginal hysterectomy for benign disease without prolapse,” Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 2010;53:5–16.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kroft, J. and Amanda, S., “Energy based vessel sealing in vaginal hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Obstetrics and Gynecology 2011;118 :1127–36.Google Scholar

Hodges, K. R., Davis, B. R., and Swaim, L. S., “Prevention and management of hysterectomy complications,” Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 2014;57:43–57.Google Scholar

Matthews, C. A. and Kenton, K., “Treatment of vaginal cuff evisceration,” Obstetrics and Gynecology 2014;124: 705–8.Google Scholar

Toy, E., “Management of a lost pedicle at the time of vaginal hysterectomy,” February 15, 2016. Available: www.exxcellence.org/pearls-of-exxcellence/list-of-pearls/management-of-a-lost-pedicle-at-the-time-of-a-vaginal-hysterectomy/.Google Scholar

Muffly, T. M. and Kow, N. S., “Effect of obesity on patients undergoing vaginal hysterectomy,” Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 2014;21:168–75.Google Scholar

Whiteman, MK, Hillis, SD, Jamieson, DJ, Morrow, B, Podgornik, MN, Brett, KM et al. Inpatient hysterectomy surveillance in the United States, 2000–2004. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2008;198(1):34.e1–7.Google Scholar

Choosing the route of hysterectomy for benign disease. ACOG Committee Opinion No 444: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstetrics Gynecology. 2009. p. 1156–8.Google Scholar

Turner, LC, Shepherd, JP, Wang, L, Bunker, CH, Lowder, JL. Hysterectomy surgery trends: a more accurate depiction of the last decade? American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2013;208(4):277.e1–7.Google Scholar

Nieboer, TE, Johnson, N, Lethaby, A, Tavender, E, Curr, E, Garry, R et al. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2009(3):CD003677.Google Scholar

Gaba, ND, Polite, FG, Keller, JM, Young, AE. To err is human; to provide safe, quality, and cost-effective hysterectomy is divine! Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2014;57(1):128–39.Google Scholar

Hampton, T. Use of morcellation to remove fibroids scrutinized at FDA hearings. The Journal of the American Medical Association. 2014;312(6):588.Google Scholar

Barron, KI, Richard, T, Robinson, PS, Lamvu, G. Association of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration morcellation warning with rates of minimally invasive hysterectomy and myomectomy. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2015;126(6):1174–80.CrossRef Google Scholar

Po, L, Lee, P. The unintended consequences of an FDA warning: the case of power morcellation in fibroid surgery. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2016; 23(4):597–602.Google Scholar

Lum, DA, Sokol, ER, Berek, JS, Schulkin, J, Chen, L, McElwain, CA et al. Impact of the 2014 FDA warnings against power morcellation. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2016; 23(4):548–56.Google Scholar

Hankinson, SE, Hunter, DJ, Colditz, GA, Willett, WC, Stampfer, MJ, Rosner, B et al. Tubal ligation, hysterectomy, and risk of ovarian cancer. A prospective study. The Journal of the American Medical Association. 1993;270(23):2813–8.Google Scholar

Salpingectomy for Ovarian Cancer Prevention. Committee Opinion No. 620. American College of Obstetrics and Gyncology. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2015(125):279–81.Google Scholar

National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Genetic/familial high-risk assessment: breast and ovarian, www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/genetics_screening.pdf. [accessed on January 16, 2016].Google Scholar

Parker, WH, Feskanich, D, Broder, MS, Chang, E, Shoupe, D, Farquhar, CM et al. Long-term mortality associated with oophorectomy compared with ovarian conservation in the nurses’ health study. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2013;121(4):709–16.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Geerts, WH, Heit, JA, Bergqvist, D, Lassen, MR, Colwell, CW et al. Prevention of venous thromboembolism: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Chest. 2004;126(suppl):338S–400S.Google Scholar

Prevention of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 84. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2007;110:429–40.Google Scholar

Solutions for surgical preparation of the vagina. Committee Opinion No. 571. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2013(122):718–20.Google Scholar

Meeks, GR. Clinical anatomy of incisions. In: Mann, WJ Jr ST, editor. Gynecologic Surgery. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1996. p. 137.Google Scholar

Clarke-Pearson, DL, Geller, EJ. Complications of hysterectomy. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2013;121(3):654–73.Google Scholar

Boesch, CE UW. Effects of wound closure on wound healing in gynecologic surgery: a systematic literature review. The Journal of Reproductive Medicine. 2009;54(3):139–44.Google Scholar

Chelmow, D RE, Sabatini, MM. Suture closure of subcutaneous fat and wound disruption after cesarean delivery: a meta-analysis, Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2004;103(5):974–80.Google Scholar

Basha, SL, Rochon, ML, Quinones, JN, Coassolo, KM, Rust, OA, Smulian, JC. Randomized controlled trial of wound complication rates of subcuticular suture vs staples for skin closure at cesarean delivery. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2010;203(3):285.e1–8.Google Scholar

Makinen, J, Johansson, J, Tomas, C, Tomas, E, Heinonen, PK, Laatikainen, T et al. Morbidity of 10 110 hysterectomies by type of approach. Human Reproduction. 2001;16(7):1473–8.Google Scholar

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Healthcare-associated infections (HAI). Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2012.Google Scholar

Soper, DE BD, Hurt, WG. Bacterial vaginosis and trichomoniasis vaginitis are risk factors for cuff cellulitis after abdominal hysterectomy. American Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology. 1990;163:1016–21.Google Scholar

Aaronson, DS, Wu, AK, Blaschko, SD, McAninch, JW, Garcia, M. National incidence and impact of noninfectious urethral catheter related complications on the Surgical Care Improvement Project. The Journal of Urology. 2011;185(5):1756–60.Google Scholar

Gilmour, DT, Dwyer, PL, Carey, MP. Lower urinary tract injury during gynecologic surgery and its detection by intraoperative cystoscopy. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1999;94(5 Pt 2):883–9.Google Scholar

Reich, H, DeCaprio, J, McGlynn, F. Laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Gynecol Surg 1989;5:213–16.Google Scholar

Reich, H,Rahmanie, N. Laparoscopic Hysterectomy. In Kavic MS, Levinson CJ, Wette PA eds Prevention and Management of Laparoendocscopic Surgical Complications 1^st Edition Miami Florida, Socisey of Laparoendoscopic Surgones, 1999.Google Scholar

Lee, PI, Lee, YT, Lee, SH, Chang, YK. Advantages of total laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1996 Aug;3(4, Supplement):S24–5.Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Choosing the Route of Hysterectomy for Benign Disease. Committee Opinion 444, November 2009, reaffirmed 2011.Google Scholar

Johns, DA, Carrera, B, Jones, J, DeLeon, F, Vincent, R, Safely, C. The medical and economic impact of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in a large, metropolitan, not-for-profit hospital. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;172:1709–19.Google Scholar

Stovall, TG, Summitt. Laparoscopic hysterectomy – is there a benefit? N Engl J Med 1996;335:512–13.Google Scholar

Nieboer, TE, Johnson, N, Lethaby, A, Tavender, E, Curr, E, Garry, R et al. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Coch Dat Sys Rev 2009;3 (CD003677).Google Scholar

Jennings, AJ, Spencer, RJ, Medlin, E, Rice, LW, Uppal, S. Predictors of 30-day readmission and impact of same-day discharge in laparoscopic hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015 Sep;213(3):344.e1-7.Google Scholar

Lassen, PD, Moeller-Larsen, H, DE Nully, P. Same-day discharge after laparoscopic hysterectomy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2012 Nov;91(11):1339–41.Google Scholar

Tsaltas, T, Dassow, JD. Advanced surgical care for a rural outreach population. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, poster presentation at 2015 Annual Clinical Meeting.Google Scholar

Alperin, M, Kivnick, S, Poon, KY. Outpatient laparoscopic hysterectomy for large uteri. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2012 Nov–Dec;19(6):689–94.Google Scholar

Donaldson, M, Gizzarelli, G, Chanpong, B. Oral sedation: a primer on anxiolysis for the adult patient. Anesth Prog 2007;54(3):118–29.Google Scholar

Slim, K, Vicaut, E, Launay-Savary, MV, Contant, C, Chipponi, J. Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials on the role of mechanical bowel preparation before colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 2009;249:203–9.Google Scholar

Bretagnol, F, Panis, Y, Rullier, E, Rouanet, P, Berdah, S, Dousset, B et al. Rectal cancer surgery with or without bowel preparation: the French GRECCAR III multicenter singleblinded randomized trial. Ann Surg 2010;252:863–8.Google Scholar

Reichman, DE, Greenberg, JA. Reducing surgical site infections: a review. Rev Obstet Gynecol 2009;2(4):212–21.Google Scholar

Nygren, J, Thorell, A, Jacobsson, H, Larsson, S, Schnell, PO, Hylén, L, Ljungqvist, O. Preoperative gastric emptying: effects of anxiety and oral carbohydrate administration. Ann Surg 1995 Dec;222(6):728–34.Google Scholar

Hunt, JN. Some properties of an alimentary osmoreceptor mechanism. J Physiol 1956 May;132(2):267–88.Google Scholar

Sutherland, AD, Stock, JG, Davies, JM. Effects of preoperative fasting on morbidity and gastric contents in patients undergoing day-stay surgery. Br J Anaesth. 1986 Aug;58(8):876–8.Google Scholar

Lindqvist, P, Dahlback, B, Marsal, K. Thrombotic risk during pregnancy: a population study. Obstet Gynecol 1999;94:595–9.Google Scholar

James A. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Practice Bulletin no. 123 Thromboembolism in Pregnancy. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2011;118(3):718–29.Google Scholar

Bates, SM. VTE, thrombophilia, antithrombotic therapy, and pregnancy. antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis. In: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest, 9th ed. 2012 Feb;141(2 Suppl):e691S–736S.Google Scholar

Clarke-Pearson, DL, Elizabeth, J. Geller, EJ. Complications of hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 2013;121:654–73.Google Scholar

Bhattacharya, S. The facts about penicillin allergy: a review. J Adv Pharm Technol Resv 2010 Jan–Mar;1(1):11–17.Google Scholar

Jacob, M, Chappell, D, Conzen, P, Finsterer, U, Rehm, M. Blood volume is normal after pre-operative overnight fasting. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2008;52(4):522.Google Scholar

Lambert, KG, Wakim, JH, Lambert, NE. Preoperative fluid bolus and reduction of postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. J A Assoc Nur Anesth 2009;77:110–4.Google Scholar

Maharaj, CH, Kallam, SR, Malik, A, Hassett, P, Grady, D, Laffey, JG. Preoperative intravenous fluid therapy decreases postoperative nausea and pain in high risk patients. Anesth Analg 2005;100:675–82.Google Scholar

Zhang, J, Ho, K-Y, Wang, Y. Efficacy of pregabalin in acute postoperative pain: a meta-analysis, Br J Anaesth 2011;106 (4):454–62.Google Scholar

Alayed, N, Alghanaim, N, Tan, X, Tulandi, T. Preemptive use of gabapentin in abdominal hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2014;123:1221–9.Google Scholar

Loring, M, Morris, SN, Isaacson, KB. Minimally invasive specialists and rates of laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Soc Laparasc Surg 2015;19(1):e2014.00221. doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2014.00221Google Scholar

Ferguson, D. Therbligs: the key to simplifying work. The Gilbreth network, http://gilbrethnetwork.tripod.com/therbligs.html.Google Scholar

Allen, K, Blascovich, J. Effects of music on cardiovascular reactivity among surgeons. J Am Med Assoc 1994;272(11):882–4.Google Scholar

Persoon, MC, Broos, HJHP, Witjes, JA, Hendrikx, AJM, Scherpbier, AJJM. The effect of distractions in the operating room during endourological procedures. Surg Endosc 2011;25(2):437–43.Google Scholar

Reichman, DE, James, A, Greenberg, JA. Reducing surgical site infections: a review. Rev Obstet Gynecol 2009;2(4):212–21.Google Scholar

Nezhat, CH, Dun, EC, Katz, A, Wieser, FA. Office visceral slide test compared with two perioperative tests for predicting periumbilical adhesions. Obstet Gynecol 2014;123:1049–56.Google Scholar

Hefni, MA, Bhaumik, J, El-Toukhy, T et al. Safety and efficacy of using the LigaSure vessel sealing system for securing the pedicles in vaginal hysterectomy: randomised controlled trial. B J Obstet and Gynaecol 2005 Mar;112(3):329–33.Google Scholar

Buller, JL, Thompson, JR, Cundiff, GW, Krueger Sullivan, L, Schön Ybarra, MA, Bent, AE. Uterosacral ligament: description of anatomic relationships to optimize surgical safety. Obstet Gynecol 2001 Jun;97(6):873–9.Google Scholar

Chin, K, Smith, BC, Maldonado, PA, Corton, M. Variability in ureteral distance to uterosacral ligament and uterine vessels with and without cervical traction. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2014 Mar–Apr;21(2):Supplement, S8Google Scholar

Hur, HC, Donnellan, N, Mansuria, S, Barber, RE, Guido, R, Lee, T. Vaginal cuff dehiscence after different modes of hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 2011 Oct;118(4):794–801.Google Scholar

Perron-Burdick, M, Yamamoto, M, Zaritsky, E. Same-day discharge after laparoscopic hysterectomy, Obstet Gynecol 2011 May;117(5):1136–41.Google Scholar

Gilmour, DT, Das, S, Flowerdew, G. Rates of urinary tract injury from gynecologic surgery and the role of intraoperative cystoscopy. Obstet Gynecol 2006;107:1366–72.Google Scholar

Carley, ME, McIntire, D, Carley, JM, Schaffer, J. Incidence, risk factors and morbidity of unintended bladder or ureter injury during hysterectomy. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2002;13:18–21.Google Scholar

Navarro, LHC, Bloomstone, JA, Auler, JOC, Cannesson, M, Della Rocca, G, Gan, TJ et al. Perioperative fluid therapy: a statement from the international Fluid Optimization Group Perioper Med. 2015; 4: 3.Published online, Apr 10, 2015.Google Scholar

Kaye, AD, Riopelle, JM. Miller’s Anesthesia. Missouri: Churchill Livingstone, 2009. Ch. Intravascular fluid and electrolyte physiology, pp. 1705–37.Google Scholar

Holte, K, Klarskov, B, Christensen, DS, Lund, C, Nielsen, KG, Bie, P et al. Liberal versus restrictive fluid administration to improve recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized, double-blind study. Ann Surg 2004;240:892–9.Google Scholar

Yee, JP, Koshiver, JE, Allbon, C, Brown, CR. Comparison of intramuscular ketorolac tromethamine and morphine sulfate for analgesia of pain after major surgery. Pharma 1986 Sep–Oct;6(5):253–61.Google Scholar

Balestrieri, P, Simmons, G, Hill, D, Brown, J, Jackson, A, Brull, SJ, Maneatis, TJ, Shefrin, A, Bynum, L, O’Hara, DA. The effect of intravenous ketorolac given intraoperatively versus postoperatively on outcome from gynecologic abdominal surgery. J Clin Anesth 1997 Aug;9(5):358–64.Google Scholar

Nakayama, M, Ichinose, H, Yamamoto, S et al. Perioperative intravenous flurbiprofen reduces postoperative pain after abdominal hysterectomy Acta Anesthesiol Scand 1999;43:13–18.Google Scholar

Rittenhouse, BE, Choiniere, M. An economic evaluation of pain therapy after hysterectomy: patient-controlled analgesia versus regular intramuscular opioid therapy. Int J Tech Assess 1999 15(3):548–62.Google Scholar

Everett, B, Salamonson, Y. Differences in postoperative opioid consumption in patients prescribed patient-controlled analgesia versus intramuscular injection. Pain Manag Nurs 2005 Dec;6(4):137–44.Google Scholar

Bayar, U. Basaran, M. Atasoy, N. Ayoglu, H. Sade, H. Altunkaya, H. Comparison of satisfaction and pain relief between patients-controlled analgesia and interval analgesia after laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2008 Jun;29(2):139–45.Google Scholar

McPherson, K, Metcalfe, MA, Herbert, A, Maresh, M, Casbard, A, Hargreaves, J et al. Severe complications of hysterectomy: the VALUE study. B J Obstet Gynecol 2004 111(7):688–94.Google Scholar

Makinen, J, Johansson, J, Tomas, C et al. Morbidity of 10,110 hysterectomies by type of approach. Hum Reprod 2001;16: 1473–8.Google Scholar

Wright, KN, Jonsdottir, GM, Jorgensen, S, Shah, N, Einarsson, JI. Costs and outcomes of abdominal, vaginal, laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomies. J S Laparosc Surg 2012 Oct–Dec;16(4):519–24.Google Scholar

Walsh, CA, Walsh, SR, Tang, TY, Slack, M. Total abdominal hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign disease: a meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2009 May;144(1):3–7.Google Scholar

Bulent Berker, MD, Salih Taskin, MD, Elif Aylin Taskin, MD. Complications of laparoscopic gynecologic surgery chapter 60 in prevention and management of laparoendoscopic surgical complications. In: S Laparoendosc Surg, 3rd ed, 2012.Google Scholar

Vilos, GA, Ternamian, A, Dempster, J et al. Laparoscopic entry: a review of techniques, technologies, and complications. The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2007 29:433–65.Google Scholar

Leron, E, Piura, B, Ohana, E, Mazor, M. Delayed recognition of major vascular injury during laparoscopy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1998 Jul;79(1):91–93.Google Scholar

Hur, HC, Donnellan, N, Mansuria, S, Barber, R, Guido, R, Lee, T. Vaginal cuff dehiscence after different modes of hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118:794–801.Google Scholar

Uccella, SU, Ceccaroni, M, Cromi, A, Malzoni, M, et al. Vaginal cuff dehiscence in a series of 12,398 hysterectomies: effect of different types of colpotomy and vaginal closure. Obstet Gynecol 2012;120:516–523.Google Scholar

Schiavone, MB, Kuo, EC, Naumann, RW et al. The commercialization of robotic surgery: unsubstantiated marketing of gynecologic surgery by hospitals. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Sep;207(3):174.e1-7.Google Scholar

Wright, JD, Herzog, TJ, Tsui, J et al. Nationwide trends in the performance of inpatient hysterectomy in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Aug;122(2 Pt 1):233–41.Google Scholar

da Vinci Surgery Community Online Training Modules [Internet]. Intuitive Surgical, Inc.; 2016 [cited Feb 8, 2016]. Available from: www.davincisurgerycommunity.com/training/onlinemodule?&tab1=TR.Google Scholar

Committee Opinion No. 628: Robotic surgery in gynecology. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Mar;125(3):760–7.Google Scholar

Gala, RB, Margulies, R, Steinberg, A et al. Systematic review of robotic surgery in gynecology: robotic techniques compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 May–Jun;21(3):353–61.Google Scholar

Liu, H, Lawrie, TA, Lu, D, Song, H, Wang, L, Shi, G. Robot-assisted surgery in gynaecology. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev. 2014 Dec 10;12:CD011422.Google Scholar

Aarts, JW, Nieboer, TE, Johnson, N et al. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 12;8:CD003677.Google Scholar

ACOG Committee Opinion No. 444: Choosing the route of hysterectomy for benign disease. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Nov;114(5):1156–8.Google Scholar

Sarlos, D, Kots, L, Stevanovic, N, von Fenton, S, Schar, G. Robotic compared with conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Sep;120(3):604–11.Google Scholar

Paraiso, MF, Ridgeway, B, Park, AJ et al. A randomized trial comparing conventional and robotically assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 May;208(5):368.e1-7.Google Scholar

Woelk, JL, Borah, BJ, Trabuco, EC, Heien, HC, Gebhart, JB. Cost differences among robotic, vaginal, and abdominal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Feb;123(2 Pt 1):255–62.Google Scholar

Landeen, LB, Bell, MC, Hubert, HB et al. Clinical and cost comparisons for hysterectomy via abdominal, standard laparoscopic, vaginal and robot-assisted approaches. S D Med. 2011 Jun;64(6):197–9.Google Scholar

Lonnerfors, C, Reynisson, P, Persson, J. A randomized trial comparing vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy vs robot-assisted hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Jan;22(1):78–86.Google Scholar

Wright, JD, Ananth, CV, Lewin, SN et al. Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease. J A Med Assoc. 2013 Feb;20;309(7):689–98.Google Scholar

Gehrig, PA, Cantrell, LA, Shafer, A, Abaid, LN, Mendivil, A, Boggess, JF. What is the optimal minimally invasive surgical procedure for endometrial cancer staging in the obese and morbidly obese woman? Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Oct;111(1):41–5.Google Scholar

Bell, MC, Torgerson, J,Seshadri-Kreaden, U, Suttle, AW, Hunt, S. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques. Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Dec;111(3):407–11.Google Scholar

Boggess, JF, Gehrig, PA, Cantrell, L et al. A comparative study of 3 surgical methods for hysterectomy with staging for endometrial cancer: robotic assistance, laparoscopy, laparotomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Oct;199(4):360.e1-9.Google Scholar

Seamon, LG, Cohn, DE, Henretta, MS et al. Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: robotics or laparoscopy? Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Apr;113(1):36–41.Google Scholar

Cardenas-Goicoechea, J, Adams, S, Bhat, SB, Randall, TC. Surgical outcomes of robotic-assisted surgical staging for endometrial cancer are equivalent to traditional laparoscopic staging at a minimally invasive surgical center. Gynecol Oncol. 2010 May;117(2):224–8.Google Scholar

Lim, PC, Kang, E, Park, DH. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010 Nov–Dec;17(6):739–48.Google Scholar

Lim, PC, Kang, E, Park, DH. A comparative detail analysis of the learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy versus laparoscopic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in treatment of endometrial cancer: a case-matched controlled study of the first one hundred twenty two patients. Gynecol Oncol. 2011 Mar;120(3):413–8.Google Scholar

Magrina, JF, Zanagnolo, V, Giles, D, Noble, BN, Kho, RM, Magtibay, PM. Robotic surgery for endometrial cancer: comparison of perioperative outcomes and recurrence with laparoscopy, vaginal/laparoscopy and laparotomy. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2011;32(5):476–80.Google Scholar

Martino, MA, Shubella, J, Thomas, MB et al. A cost analysis of postoperative management in endometrial cancer patients treated by robotics versus laparoscopic approach. Gynecol Oncol. 2011 Dec;123(3):528–31.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Seamon, LG, Bryant, SA, Rheaume, PS et al. Comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer in obese patients: comparing robotics and laparotomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jul;114(1):16–21.Google Scholar

DeNardis, SA, Holloway, RW, Bigsby, GE IV, Pikaart, DP, Ahmad, S, Finkler, NJ. Robotically assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Dec;111(3):412–7.Google Scholar

ElSahwi, KS, Hooper, C, De Leon, MC et al. Comparison between 155 cases of robotic vs. 150 cases of open surgical staging for endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2012 Feb;124(2):260–4.Google Scholar

Subramaniam, A, Kim, KH, Bryant, SA et al. A cohort study evaluating robotic versus laparotomy surgical outcomes of obese women with endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2011 Sep;122(3):604–7.Google Scholar

Barnett, JC, Judd, JP, Wu, JM, Scales, CD Jr, Myers, ER, Havrilesky, LJ. Cost comparison among robotic, laparoscopic, and open hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Sep;116(3):685–93.Google Scholar

Soliman, PT, Frumovitz, M, Sun, CC et al. Radical hysterectomy: a comparison of surgical approaches after adoption of robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology. Gynecol Oncol. 2011 Nov;123(2):333–6.Google Scholar

Boggess, JF, Gehrig, PA, Cantrell, L et al. A case-control study of robot-assisted type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection compared with open radical hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Oct;199(4):357.e1-7.Google Scholar

Maggioni, A, Minig, L, Zanagnolo, V et al. Robotic approach for cervical cancer: comparison with laparotomy: a case control study. Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Oct;115(1):60–4.Google Scholar

Cantrell, LA, Mendivil, A, Gehrig, PA, Boggess, JF. Survival outcomes for women undergoing type III robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a 3-year experience. Gynecol Oncol. 2010 May;117(2):260–5.Google Scholar

Geisler, JP, Orr, CJ, Khurshid, N, Phibbs, G, Manahan, KJ. Robotically assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy compared with open radical hysterectomy. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2010 Apr;20(3):438–42.Google Scholar

Nam, EJ, Kim, SW, Kim, S et al. A case-control study of robotic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy using 3 robotic arms compared with abdominal radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2010 Oct;20(7):1284–9.Google Scholar

Pundir, J, Pundir, V, Walavalkar, R, Omanwa, K, Lancaster, G, Kayani, S. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic vs abdominal and laparoscopic myomectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013 May–Jun;20(3):335–45.Google Scholar

Hanafi, MM, Hsu, YS, Fomo, AN. Comparative study between robotic laparoscopic myomectomy and abdominal myomectomy and factors affecting short-term surgical outcomes. J Reprod Med Endokrinol. 2010;7(4):258.Google Scholar

Advincula, AP, Xu, X, Goudeau, S IV, Ransom, SB. Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical outcomes and immediate costs. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007 Nov–Dec;14(6):698–705.Google Scholar

Ascher-Walsh, CJ, Capes, TL. Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy is an improvement over laparotomy in women with a limited number of myomas. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010 May–Jun;17(3):306–10.Google Scholar

Sangha, R. Eisenstein, D. George, A. Munkarah, A. Wegienka, G. Comparison of surgical outcomes for robotic assisted laparoscopic myomectomy compared to abdominal myomectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010 Nov–Dec;17(6 Suppl 1):S108.Google Scholar

Barakat, EE, Bedaiwy, MA, Zimberg, S, Nutter, B, Nosseir, M, Falcone, T. Robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of surgical outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Feb;117(2 Pt 1):256–65.Google Scholar

Nash, K, Feinglass, J, Zei, C et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy: a comparative analysis of surgical outcomes and costs. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012 Feb;285(2):435–40.Google Scholar

Mansour, FW, Kives, S, Urbach, DR, Lefebvre, G. Robotically assisted laparoscopic myomectomy: a Canadian experience. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2012 Apr;34(4):353–8.Google Scholar

Nezhat, C, Lavie, O, Hsu, S, Watson, J, Barnett, O, Lemyre, M. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy compared with standard laparoscopic myomectomy: a retrospective matched control study. Fertil Steril. 2009 Feb;91(2):556–9.Google Scholar

Bedient, CE, Magrina, JF, Noble, BN, Kho, RM. Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic myomectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Dec;201(6):566.e1-5.Google Scholar

Gargiulo, AR, Srouji, SS, Missmer, SA, Correia, KF, Vellinga, TT, Einarsson, JI. robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy compared with standard laparoscopic myomectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Aug;120(2, Pt 1):284–91.Google Scholar

Carbonnel, M, Goetgheluck, J, Frati, A, Even, M, Ayoubi, JM. Robot-assisted laparoscopy for infertility treatment: current views. Fertil Steril. 2014 Mar;101(3):621–6.Google Scholar

Nezhat, C, Lewis, M, Kotikela, S et al. Robotic versus standard laparoscopy for the treatment of endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2010 Dec;94(7):2758–60.Google Scholar

Ercoli, A, D’asta, M, Fagotti, A et al. Robotic treatment of colorectal endometriosis: technique, feasibility and short-term results. Hum Reprod. 2012 Mar;27(3):722–6.Google Scholar

Collinet, P, Leguevaque, P, Neme, RM et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopy for deep infiltrating endometriosis: international multicentric retrospective study. Surg Endosc. 2014 Aug;28(8):2474–9.Google Scholar

Anger, JT, Mueller, ER, Tarnay, C et al. Robotic compared with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jan;123(1):5–12.Google Scholar

Paraiso, MF, Jelovsek, JE, Frick, A, Chen, CC, Barber, MD. Laparoscopic compared with robotic sacrocolpopexy for vaginal prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Nov;118(5):1005–13.Google Scholar

Wright, JD, Kostolias, A, Ananth, CV et al. Comparative effectiveness of robotically assisted compared with laparoscopic adnexal surgery for benign gynecologic disease. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Nov;124(5):886–96.Google Scholar

George, K, Kamath, MS, Tharyan, P. Minimally invasive versus open surgery for reversal of tubal sterilization. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Feb;2:CD009174.Google Scholar

Dharia Patel, SP, Steinkampf, MP, Whitten, SJ, Malizia, BA. Robotic tubal anastomosis: surgical technique and cost effectiveness. Fertil Steril. 2008 Oct;90(4):1175–9.Google Scholar

Rodgers, AK, Goldberg, JM, Hammel, JP, Falcone, T. Tubal anastomosis by robotic compared with outpatient minilaparotomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jun;109(6):1375–80.Google Scholar

Owens, AE, Irobunda, HO, Henne, MB. Microscopic tubal reversal: robot assisted laparoscopy or microsurgery?. Fertil Steril. 2012 Sep;98(3 Suppl 1):S36.Google Scholar

AAGL Advancing Minimally Invasive Gynecology Worldwide. AAGL position statement: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery in benign gynecology. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013 Jan–Feb;20(1):2–9.Google Scholar

Lenihan, JP Jr, Kovanda, C, Seshadri-Kreaden, U. What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery?. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008 Sep–Oct;15(5):589–94.Google Scholar

Yamasato, K, Casey, D, Kaneshiro, B, Hiraoka, M. Effect of robotic surgery on hysterectomy trends: implications for resident education. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 May–Jun;21(3):399–405.Google Scholar

Jeppson, PC, Rahimi, S, Gattoc, L et al. Impact of robotic technology on hysterectomy route and associated implications for resident education. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Feb;212(2):196.e1-6.Google Scholar

Moola, D, Westermann, LB, Pauls, R, Eschenbacher, M, Crisp, C. The impact of robotic-assisted surgery on training gynecology residents. Fem Pelv Med Reconstr Surg. 2016 Jan–Feb;22(1):11–15.Google Scholar

Schreuder, HW, Wolswijk, R, Zweemer, RP, Schijven, MP, Verheijen, RH. Training and learning robotic surgery, time for a more structured approach: a systematic review. B J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jan;119(2):137–49.Google Scholar

Bienstock, J, Adams, KE, Connolly, A et al. The Obstetrics and Gynecology Milestones Project [Internet]. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, The American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology; 2015 [version 09/2013; cited 2016 Feb 8]. Available from: www.acgme.org/acgmeweb/portals/0/pdfs/milestones/obstetricsandgynecologymilestones.pdf.Google Scholar

AAGL Advancing Minimally Invasive Gynecology Worldwide. Guidelines for privileging for robotic-assisted gynecologic laparoscopy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 Mar–Apr;21(2):157–67.Google Scholar

Makai, G, Isaacson, K. Complications of gynecologic laparoscopy. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Sep;52(3):401–11.Google Scholar

Sharma, KC, Brandstetter, RD, Brensilver, JM, Jung, LD. Cardiopulmonary physiology and pathophysiology as a consequence of laparoscopic surgery. Chest. 1996 Sep;110(3):810–5.Google Scholar

Harris, WJ. Early complications of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1995; 50:795.Google Scholar

Santoso, JT, Saunders, BA, Grosshart, K. Massive blood loss and transfusion in obstetrics and gynecology. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2005; 60:827.Google Scholar

Carson, JL, Noveck, H, Berlin, JA, Gould, SA. Mortality and morbidity in patients with very low postoperative Hb levels who decline blood transfusion. Transfusion 2002; 42:812.Google Scholar

Maslovitz, S, Barkai, G, Lessing, JB et al. Recurrent obstetric management mistakes identified by simulation. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109:1295.Google Scholar

Deering, SH, Chinn, M, Hodor, J et al. Use of a postpartum hemorrhage simulator for instruction and evaluation of residents. J Grad Med Educ 2009; 1:260.Google Scholar

Huser, AS, Müller, D, Brunkhorst, V et al. Simulated life-threatening emergency during robot-assisted surgery. J Endourol 2014; 28:717.Google Scholar

Tunitsky-Bitton, E, King, CR, Ridgeway, B et al. Development and validation of a laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy simulation model for surgical training. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2014; 21:612.Google Scholar

Duenas-Garcia, OF, Goldberg, JM. Topical hemostatic agents in gynecologic surgery. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2008; 63:389.Google Scholar

Harris, WJ. Early complications of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1995; 50:795.Google Scholar

Santoso, JT, Saunders, BA, Grosshart, K. Massive blood loss and transfusion in obstetrics and gynecology. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2005; 60:827.Google Scholar

Carson, JL, Noveck, H, Berlin, JA, Gould, SA. Mortality and morbidity in patients with very low postoperative Hb levels who decline blood transfusion. Transfusion 2002; 42:812.Google Scholar

Achneck, HE, Sileshi, B, Jamiolkowski, RM et al. A comprehensive review of topical hemostatic agents: efficacy and recommendations for use. Ann Surg 2010; 251:217.Google Scholar

Gabay, M. Absorbable hemostatic agents. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2006; 63:1244.Google Scholar

Berrevoet, F, de Hemptinne, B. Use of topical hemostatic agents during liver resection. Dig Surg 2007; 24:288.Google Scholar

Hong, YM, Loughlin, KR. The use of hemostatic agents and sealants in urology. J Urol 2006; 176:2367.Google Scholar

Weaver, FA, Hood, DB, Zatina, M et al. Gelatin-thrombin-based hemostatic sealant for intraoperative bleeding in vascular surgery. Ann Vasc Surg 2002; 16:286.Google Scholar

Mannucci, PM. Hemostatic drugs. N Engl J Med 1998; 339:245.Google Scholar

Duenas-Garcia, OF, Goldberg, JM. Topical hemostatic agents in gynecologic surgery. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2008; 63:389.Google Scholar

Borten, M, Friedman, EA. Translaparoscopic hemostasis with microfibrillar collagen in lieu of laparotomy. A report of two cases. J Reprod Med 1983; 28:804.Google Scholar

Holus, Z, Jabor, A. Laparoscopic management of bleeding after laparoscopic or vaginal hysterectomy. J S Laparoendos Surg 2004; 8:235.Google Scholar

Buchsbaum, GM, Moll, C, Duecy, EE. True occult bladder perforation during placement of tension-free vaginal tape. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2004; 15:432.Google Scholar

Labin, LC, Morse, AN, Young, SB. Vaginal revision of intravesical tension-free vaginal tape 44 h after initial placement: a case report. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2007; 18:223.Google Scholar

Doyle, PJ, Lipetskaia, L, Duecy, E et al. Sodium fluorescein use during intraoperative cystoscopy. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 125:548.Google Scholar

Indigo carmine injection www.ashp.org/menu/DrugShortages/CurrentShortages/Bulletin.aspx?id=861 (Accessed on December 05, 2015).Google Scholar

Graziano, S, Hoyte, L, Vilich, F, Brubaker, L. Life-threatening reaction to indigo carmine – a sulfa allergy? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2005; 16:418.Google Scholar

Chan, JK, Morrow, J, Manetta, A. Prevention of ureteral injuries in gynecologic surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 188:1273.Google Scholar

Teeluckdharry, B, Gilmour, D, Flowerdew, G. Urinary tract injury at benign gynecologic surgery and the role of cystoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 126:1161.Google Scholar

Ibeanu, OA, Chesson, RR, Echols, KT et al. Urinary tract injury during hysterectomy based on universal cystoscopy. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 113:6.Google Scholar

Jelovsek, JE, Chiung, C, Chen, G, et al. Incidence of lower urinary tract injury at the time of total laparoscopic hysterectomy. J S Laparoendos Surg 2007; 11:422.Google Scholar

Gilmour, DT, Baskett, TF. Disability and litigation from urinary tract injuries at benign gynecologic surgery in Canada. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 105:109Google Scholar

Gilmour, DT, Das, S, Flowerdew, G. Rates of urinary tract injury from gynecologic surgery and the role of intraoperative cystoscopy. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107:1366.Google Scholar

Ramahi, AJ, Richardson, DA, Ataya, KM. Urethral stones in women. A case report. J Reprod Med 1993; 38:743.Google Scholar

Kim, JH, Moore, C, Jones, JS, et al. Management of ureteral injuries associated with vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2006; 17:531.Google Scholar

Hanke, PR, Timm, P, Falk, G, Kramer, W. Behavior of different suture materials in the urinary bladder of the rabbit with special reference to wound healing, epithelization and crystallization. Urol Int 1994; 52:26.Google Scholar

Hepperlen, TW, Stinson, W, Hutson, J, Bartone, FF. Epithelialization after cystotomy. Invest Urol 1975; 12:269.Google Scholar

Cardosi, RJ, Cox, CS, Hoffman, MS. Postoperative neuropathies after major pelvic surgery. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 100:240.Google Scholar

Bohrer, JC, Walters, MD, Park, A et al. Pelvic nerve injury following gynecologic surgery: a prospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 201:531.e1.Google Scholar

Whiteside, JL, Barber, MD, Walters, MD, Falcone, T. Anatomy of ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerves in relation to trocar placement and low transverse incisions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189:1574.Google Scholar

Sippo, WC, Burghardt, A, Gomez, AC. Nerve entrapment after Pfannenstiel incision. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 157:420.Google Scholar

Loos, MJ, Scheltinga, MR, Mulders, LG, Roumen, RM. The Pfannenstiel incision as a source of chronic pain. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 111:839.Google Scholar

Ducic, I, Moxley, M, Al-Attar, A. Algorithm for treatment of postoperative incisional groin pain after cesarean delivery or hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 2006’ 108:27.Google Scholar

Grosz, CR. Iliohypogastric nerve injury. Am J Surg 1981; 142:628.Google Scholar

Kim, DH, Murovic, JA, Tiel, RL, Kline, DG. Surgical management of 33 ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric neuralgias at Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center. Neurosurgery 2005; 56:1013.Google Scholar

Irvin, W, Andersen, W, Taylor, P, Rice, L. Minimizing the risk of neurologic injury in gynecologic surgery. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103:374.Google Scholar

Chan, JK, Manetta, A. Prevention of femoral nerve injuries in gynecologic surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186:1.Google Scholar

Sajid, M, Shakir, A, Khatri, K, Baig, M. Lithotomy-related neurovascular complications in the lower limbs after colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2010 May 6.Google Scholar

Schneiderman, Bl, Bomze, E. Paresthesias of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve after pelvic surgery. Am Surg 1967; 33:84.Google Scholar

Corona, R, De Cicco, C, Schonman, R et al. Tension-free vaginal tapes and pelvic nerve neuropathy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2008; 15:262.Google Scholar

Kim, DH, Murovic, JA, Tiel, RL, Kline, DG. Management and outcomes in 318 operative common peroneal nerve lesions at the Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center. Neurosurgery 2004; 54:1421.Google Scholar

Benson, JT, Griffis, K. Pudendal neuralgia, a severe pain syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 192:1663.Google Scholar

Hager, WD, Dougherty, MJ. Chapter 11. Postoperative infections: prevention and management. In Jones HW and Rock JA, eds., TeLinde’s Operative Gynecology, 11th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, pp. 177–88, Chapter 11.Google Scholar

Li, J, Chen, J, Kirsner, R. Pathophysiology of acute wound healing. Clin Derm 2007;25(1):9–18.Google Scholar

Kehlet, H. Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Surv Anes. 1998;42(4):233. Retrieved from: http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/content/78/5/606.long (Accessed on April 16, 2016).Google Scholar

Barber, EL, Le, LV. Enhanced recovery pathways in gynecology and gynecologic oncology. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2015;70(12):780–92.Google Scholar

Erekson, E, Sallis, Y, Ciarleglio, M, Fried, T. Postoperative complications after gynecologic surgery. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 118(4):785–93.Google Scholar

Stasiowska, MK, Ng, SC, Gubbay, AN, Cregg, R. Postoperative pain management. Br J Hosp Med 2015;76(10):570–5.Google Scholar

Shaw, HA, Shaw, JA. Perioperative Management of the Female Patient. Schwer, WA, ed. 2015 [cited Jan 1, 2016]. Retrieved from: http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/285544-overview#a7 Google Scholar

Rigg, JR, Jamrozik, K, Myles, PS et al. Epidural anaesthesia and analgesia and outcome of major surgery: a randomized trial. The Lancet 2002;359(9314):1276–82.Google Scholar

Bienstock, JL, Johnson, CT. Johns Hopkins Manual of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Wolters Kluwer; [cited Jan 24, 2016]. Retrieved from: www.lww.com/product/9781451188806 Google Scholar

Macmillan, SL, Kammerer-Doak, D, Rogers, RG, Parker, KM. Early feeding and the incidence of gastrointestinal symptoms after major gynecologic surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96(4):604–8.Google Scholar

Warren, J, Bhalla, V, Cresci, G. Postoperative diet advancement: surgical dogma vs evidence- based medicine. Nut C Prac 2011;26(2):115–25.Google Scholar

Church, S, Robinson, TN, Angles, EM, Tran, ZV, Wallace, JI. Postoperative falls in the acute hospital setting: characteristics, risk factors, and outcomes in males. Am J Surg 2011;201(2):197–202.Google Scholar

Wieslander, CK, Marshall, DD. Chapter 45. Perioperative, intraoperative, & postoperative complications in gynecologic surgery. Current Diagnosis & Treatment: Obstetrics & Gynecology. 11th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Medical, 2007. pp. 1–25.Google Scholar

McMillen matt., What to do to reduce your risk of these post-surgery complications Martin, LJ, ed. WebMD.com. 2010 [cited Jan 23, 2016]. Retrieved from: www.webmd.com/healthy-aging/common-surgery-complications?print=true.Google Scholar

Morgan, DM, Swenson, CW, Streifel, KM, Kamdar, NS, Uppal, S, Burgunder-Zdravkovski, L et al. Surgical site infection following hysterectomy: adjusted rankings in a regional collaborative. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(2):259.e8.Google Scholar

Hoffman, BL, Williams, JW. Williams Gynecology, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Medical, 2012.Google Scholar

ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 104: Antibiotic prophylaxis for gynecologic procedures. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113(5):1180–9.Google Scholar

ACOG Practice Bulletin Number 84: Prevention of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Obstet Gynecol 2007;110:429–40.Google Scholar

Geller, EJ. Prevention and management of postoperative urinary retention after urogynecologic surgery. Inter J World Heal. Retrieved from: www.dovepress.com/prevention-and-management-of-postoperative-urinary-retention-after-uro-peer-reviewed-articleijwh Google Scholar

Kelly, CE. Evaluation of voiding dysfunction and measurement of bladder volume. Reviews in Urology. 2004 [cited Feb 27, 2016];6(1):S34–S37. Retrieved from: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc1472847/Google Scholar

Appleton, S. Management of Postoperative Ileus. Pearls of Exxcellence. Olsen, M, ed. The Foundation for Exxcellence in Women’s Health. 2015 [cited Feb 16, 2016]. Retrieved from: www.exxcellence.org/pearls-of-exxcellence/list-of-pearls/#pearl-4865 Google Scholar

Hafiz, S, Kurrimboccus, MS. Patient satisfaction questionnaires in surgery: inpatients’ perceptions and experiences of surgical wards in general surgery. J Periop Pract 2015;10:1970–2035.Google Scholar

Book contents

Section 2 - Gynecologic Surgery

Access options

References

References

References

References

References

References

References

References

References

References

References

References

Book contents

Section 2 - Gynecologic Surgery

Access options

References

References

References

References

References

References

References

References

References

References

References

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive